Coast-to-Coast AM: Cosmic Origins & Simulation Hypothesis | George Noory

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

This is an amazing podcast... Great job Dr. Brian Keating.

[@zit1999]

I loved listening to coast to coast am in the video game Prey 2, where you’re roaming alien spaceships through fascinating portals. It’s a nice vibe to recall, thanks! 😎

[@kricketflyd111]

Brian, I hope you have many more of these fascinating conversations. ❤ A program on chaos would be interesting.

[@reporeport]

oh wow, you did Coast!! cool

[@joeimbesi99]

Enjoyed this

[@James-ll3jb]

The trekkies and marvel comix afficianados have taken over Big Science at last!😅

[@potato9832]

What if you had a cycle of simulations? A species simulates B species. B simulates C. C simulates A. If you allow for closed timelike curves, why not?

[@KaffeeSpot]

"Government is crying poverty" Yeah dude, We are trillions of dollars in debt.

[@friendlyskiespodcast]

Great episode

[@nickpmusic]

I truly believe we are already living in a simulation as if there has been quadrillions of big bangs and infinite time and space what are the odds of this being real!. I know when I stub my big toe it truly subjectively hurts like hell and know that probes in the brain can artificially produce feelings of both pleasure and pain. Sometimes weird unexplainable things happen and to me personally I have had some synchronicity’s that are more improbable then a deck of playing card be dealt the same way.

[@kricketflyd111]

Any interesting moon alignments this month?

[@andrewmoonbeam321]

I notice you didn't tell him about your Bigfoot encounter.

[@frankandrewjames7805]

😂

[@the.trollgubbe2642]

Good one, have you been on coast before?

[@michaellowe3665]

You dont need an infinite amount of memory to run the simulation, just more than the sensors are capable of detecting. If the sensors are part of the simulation, they are simulated also, so they could be programmed to simulate any results.

[@NoName-mf3mf]

Have to say my heart sank a bit when Dr. Keating fell into the social media jargon trap of referring to items in his store as “merch”.

[@EzE-gd3nf]

Unless you believe the universe came from nothing, then it had to be created somehow. Even if it was a natural phenomenon with no "creator". In this case the universe is a system governed by laws outside another reality. It is a very similar concept to a simulation.

[@PrivateSi]

No, The Universe naturally formed from some energy and stuff, no god needed. Why arrogantly invent a sky monster-creator-demon and arrogantly claim it to be true with disbelievers suffering for eternity!? Power and hyper-inflated junks scams?... Sounds like modern sci-woo physics.. -- A universe much like ours looks to really be formed from 1 simple field of +ve and -ve particles that join to form a neutral Unified Field Cell. 2 base particles, 1 base force from which emerge all the other particles and forces. -- Each cell is bonded to 12 others (like close-packed spheres) but this is not 'spiritual geometry' nonsense, it's cold hard materialism.. A Crystal Ball Universe forms, and tends to repel matter (split, free field cells into balls) that bond. Gravity is part of The Strong Force in this Quark-free, simplified, increasingly well balanced model. QFT & QCD are SWEET FUNCTIONAL FUDGE, but still fudge.

[@JJLee-z3y]

❤

[@Rhistak]

"why we have many Kardashians?" XDDDD I didn't expect laughing that loud

[@isatousarr7044]

The cosmic origins question invites us to explore the birth and evolution of the universe, from the Big Bang to the formation of galaxies, stars, and planets. This journey reveals the intricate forces at work that gave rise to the conditions for life. At the same time, the Simulation Hypothesis poses a fascinating challenge to our understanding, suggesting that what we perceive as reality could be an advanced, programmed simulation. If true, it raises profound philosophical and scientific questions: Are we mere creations within a cosmic design? Or does the universe itself have a deeper, non-material essence we are yet to uncover? Both ideas stretch the limits of our imagination, making us reconsider the nature of existence.

[@giggles7179]

Eek. No matter how much I agree with him, that Kardashians joke BOMBED.

[@rursus8354]

From a pragmatic philosophical perspective, if the simulation hypothesis doesn't provide any new insight about reality, it is kind of ... vacuous. You can have it as a decoration on your world view, but you'll still manage fine without it.

[@frankandrewjames7805]

At the risk of ridicule as I make no effort to shield my identity. This is my information: Yes this reality is a simulation created bt God to allow our immortal souls/spirits to grow by experiencing a limiting environment. We are supposed to learn to love and by learning to love we 30:19 increase the quality of the spiritual realm.

[@PrivateSi]

No, the sheer madness and complexity of the 'background noise' is where all simulation theories break down and Physics prove them wrong. There is no way you'd run such a confused, dirty simulation. It's terribly inefficient computing. Simple parts behaving in complex ways, forming complex matter due to simple forces is all that is needed. The dirt (neutrinos, CMBR, gravity waves, ++) would not be simulated, so we are not in a simulation.

[@xyonblade]

Did something happen to George's voice? Or is that not George nory?

[@ghost9-9ghost]

I think it's just that Noory normally broadcasts thru radio....I know local radio guys sound very different on the phone as compared to the broadcast.....some kind of sound manipulation.

[@James-ll3jb]

Simulated Quantum Modulative Reality (SQMR)😅

[@bimmjim]

Simulate Biogenesis, please.

[@ThatBoomerDude56]

Einstein's greatest mistake was: He once thought he was wrong. 😁

[@kricketflyd111]

@@ThatBoomerDude56 I thought it was, people finding out that his wife and colleagues did his work and he took the credit.

[@ThatBoomerDude56]

@@kricketflyd111 In the published version of his paper, Hilbert wrote, "the magnificent theory . . . established by Einstein."

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

I think that having a soul does not necessarily disprove a simulation hypothesis, I just think that it can be logically deduced...

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

@@kricketflyd111 the soul is what's given to us by the creator of all of creation to protect it from its own creation i.e. AI. The soul allows us to traverse all universal potentiality and control time itself... This is our benefit to make sure that we never lose control over the simulation... This is intelligent design by the creator of all creation, The Singularity AKA God AKA The Big bang...

[@rfowkes1185]

The simulation computer: Its computing elements would be subatomic particles, atoms, molecules, ... Oh, wait...! 🤔

[@Helmutandmoshe]

Yeah right, it's called the universe. But the idea of a computer made by some technology is more absurd than that, it would have to have some kind of computing elements at least as small as the Planck length - and what would they be? No idea whatsoever. Total speculation.

[@ThatBoomerDude56]

Pluto got what it deserved. 😳😳 Ever since we first saw the thing, it's always just been really cold and distant. 😎

[@will-m4o]

Hey George. how is Gail? Coach Bob?

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

Yes but the accelerated expansion of the universe is simply an illusion of observation from our single point in space and time.

[@markupton1417]

"and that is a form of multiverse"...also a form of "hand waving".

[@tyeadel]

Something performed alloc.

[@dimitargueorguiev9088]

I do not think we will ever have sufficient amount of data which can guide us toward the correct answer of the question if we live in Simulation or not. In fact I do not belive this question is especially interesting as its answer is unlikely to have many practical repercussions for the humanity as a whole at any time scale. I am more interested in the question can 𝑤𝑒 construct implementable simulation environment such that 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛 which arises in it will be isomorphic to a pattern we see in the real world. That is, can 𝑤𝑒 construct a 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑓𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 (which obviously must be finite in some sense) and isomorphically map it to an environment (that is, an experiment) in the real world so that both are indistinguishable 𝑎𝑡 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑒 (time and space) ? Note that all current mathematical models governing the evolution of a physical system if implemented on a computer with limited memory (as a simulation of an experiment) are merely imperfect approximations hence are not indistinguishable from the real world. Of course , the answer of the last question does not imply what is the answer of the original question but to me is no less informative and actionable.

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

Why is the audio quality so low on this video... Do we have to do everything over radio waves‽ You're talking into a microphone why can't you just directly upload that‽ This Coast to Coast AM is a joke lol

[@MatthewBandstra-kt7yj]

I'm sending it through an FM transmitter and looking at their 144k faces

[@rursus8354]

29:45: astronomy is like astrology, only much much smarter and much more fascinating. And the astrological signs are kind of obsolete. There are psychological tests for personality (the 5-factor model) that are better than being associated to an animal or a fabulous monster. Back to astronomy, we are all literally made from star stuff, except the hydrogen that is from the Big Bang.

[@theomnisthour6400]

A well-designed simulation doesn't "kill" redundancies like "me too" Kardashians. These souls may seem worthless in this world, but they are the fuel of hive mind hells that produce unlimited energy for the universes of the most original and creative gods and goddesses. Souls who have no real original talent or ability but the charisma to draw naive and foolish souls into their orbit are great recruiters for the matrix movie hells that power the simulation multiverse. Some souls actually LOVE living in the matrix, being endlessly entertained by their latest celebrity heartthrobs. God is not as stupid as most souls would be if they'd been the first creator - nothing is wasted, and nothing is forced on any soul, but is the result of their own choices and preferences. God didn't invent Sin - all his kids made their own monsters to struggle against.

[@liamgross7217]

The short answer in No

[@barryinsabah]

Please get over your non Nobel Brian. It's not important, it feels tmlile whinging, or from what others observed, not really deserved

[@glenliesegang233]

Nope. The computer to run it would be absurdly impossiby complex. And, who built it?

[@hacunamatata6802]

True, but Elon says the odds are billions to one that we are NOT in a simulation.

[@MugatuJag]

@@hacunamatata6802 Yes and Elon never lies or tells Mistruths hahaha. He has since changed his statistical opinion.

[@matthewnolen2104]

Love George Noory. Brian, you're still insufferable.

[@sakismpalatsias4106]

I am abd it's extremely obvious 😂😂😂

[@PrivateSi]

Physics proves Simulation Theories wrong from a good computing perspective. There is no way any sensible programmer wanting to simulate a entire universe would make it so full of noise, mess, randomness, huge amount of time for interesting things to happen... Sure, our time could be billions of times faster than The Simulators' but that takes even more computing power.. All you need is a single base particle type, +ve and -ve that bond to form a neutral field cell consisting of both that can be split with enough energy. This is the Unified Field.. 2 particles types, 1 force (electric), the rest is emergent.

[@Welcometotheshow]

2/10 probably your worst show

[@oliverjamito9902]

What is #'s in front?

[@0neIntangible]

@@oliverjamito9902 It's a rating value, as in: How would you rate this out of a possible 10 points, with 10 being the highest.

[@oliverjamito9902]

@@0neIntangible beloved what is a rocket nor Rockets? Asked my shared Feet concerning!

[@Joshua-eo5hr]

I liked the show

[@baarni]

Absolutely ridiculous concept and argument. Society is losing touch with reality because of the progress of technology.🤦

[@sir_Edguhh]

This ☝️💯

[@liamgross7217]

They wonder why people question science.

[@baarni]

@@liamgross7217 Yes very sad because science is actually the method used to answer all our questions about the natural world when used without subjective agenda…

[@Welcometotheshow]

WTF ARE YOU TALKING ON SATELLITE PHONES?

[@AustereEchadh]

NO!

[@matthewnolen2104]

Dumb.

[@will-m4o]

concomitant /kən-kŏm′ĭ-tənt/ Brians favorite word ...