It's amazing how he can discuss this concept while writing the stuff down in reverse
@Yashodhan19177 жыл бұрын
He's not writing in reverse lol, they flip the video later.
@arkapatra98525 жыл бұрын
r/wooosh
@vijayanpp1864 жыл бұрын
I can't flipped.if you flipped, hands won't like that. Left hands become right hand
@isadorazampol89476 жыл бұрын
Thank you for saving a physics student’s life
@TheNarutoShadows6 жыл бұрын
Out of all the videos that i have watched, your explanation is best,please keep up the good work, and thanks a lot.
@Farzad1982Mohaddes6 жыл бұрын
Fantastic teaching technic and elaboration! Thank you.
@titusvarughese3677 жыл бұрын
honestly one of the best explanation
@jays59265 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much Cogverse Academy:). Professionalism, at its finest. Cheers from Asia
@laurenbolger33913 жыл бұрын
I dont know who you are but I need to say thank you with my whole heart
@juniorcyans29888 ай бұрын
I’ve taken modern physics and mathematical physics, and I did pretty well. But now every thing started to make sense. Everything takes time to digest. This video combines many points I learned from various classes I took. I don’t think my past me could understand it 😅
@alexanderhenn23185 жыл бұрын
Like no. 501 was me, You are a genius!!! You helped me tremendously!
@chinmayjoshi255 жыл бұрын
Amazin video. learnt more in this than my 2 hour class
@neilh.43855 жыл бұрын
Hey I needed a refresher on this topic for my job, hadn't studied this in like 4 years, this was perfect for me. Thanks!
@DeltaSigma164 жыл бұрын
This is so helpfull to me, God bless you Sir !
@akkumar87684 жыл бұрын
One of the best video lecture❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️love from India.
@jacobvandijk65254 жыл бұрын
Finally someone who uses the right symbol for potential energy.
@wadjo14 жыл бұрын
Its V!!!!
@jacobvandijk65254 жыл бұрын
@@wadjo1 No!!! It's U. V is the symbol for potential (in Volts). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Derived_units
@mks68057 жыл бұрын
im a student of NITR.it is very easy to understand...thanku sir so much
@Slacademia7 жыл бұрын
Malay kumar Sethy thanks for watching!
@llamear3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for great explanations!
@abdullahismail27706 жыл бұрын
Sir how could you write in the opposite direction so perfectly?
@AA-oh6oo3 жыл бұрын
thank you for making my life easy
@amyliu23944 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! Currently struggling in p-chem.
@darkeagle9995 жыл бұрын
Very clear explanation!
@sankeshdehade70756 жыл бұрын
You really explain it in a very simple manner. Thank you so much. Could you please upload next lecture videos.
@jays59265 жыл бұрын
It blows my mind how schrodinger was able to deduce this given only knowledge of what Bohr had provided regarding the theory of the atom and broglies wavelength
@sscissleepy51604 жыл бұрын
god you saved me!!! I am doing chemistry and when learning quantum it kills me...
@kunalkhandait94386 жыл бұрын
Amazing...
@isacnewton1526 жыл бұрын
Please can you do vedio about Solution of schrodinger equation of the hydrogene atom
@azice60346 жыл бұрын
What does it mean for the areas in the equations n=2,3,4 etc where it’s negative (under the x axis) like physically what does it mean that n=2 has some area under the x axis but n=1 doesn’t for example
@ProfessorMdoesScience4 жыл бұрын
The wave function is in general a complex function, so not only can it be negative, but it can also be an imaginary number or a complex number at some points. However, the physically relevant quantity is the absolute value squared of the wave function, which is always positive. In your case for n=2, the absolute value squared of the wave function would be positive on both sides of the well, with equal amplitude. I plot these in a recent video, where it should become clear: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppO9f2uGmZ2el8U
@harrisouadamu77585 жыл бұрын
Thanks Sir May Allah bless you
@asdfasdf-pk3sb6 жыл бұрын
This guy is soo cool! :)
@Slacademia6 жыл бұрын
asdf1234 asdf1234 physics is cool! I’m just the messenger :)
@user-rg1nt9lf4s6 жыл бұрын
very good content sir. thank you .. sir kindly make a video on Bound States for Potential Wells with no rigid walls.(wkb approximation )
@kmu19174 жыл бұрын
Best lecture👍❤️ from s.korea
@jolez_48694 жыл бұрын
Man where can I learn that type of handwriting??
@abhaparanjape47135 жыл бұрын
Nice explaination sir.
@siddharthsathyab69524 жыл бұрын
Writing physics in reverse, this guy!!!
@yogeshgharu84175 жыл бұрын
Can you please make a video on Finite potential energy well
@farhantejani82875 жыл бұрын
nah but give schloppy top
@erayschulz17825 жыл бұрын
@@farhantejani8287 DM me
@BivekChettri4 жыл бұрын
Nailed it down... thanks allott
@gyandeepbordoloi10356 жыл бұрын
nicely explained
@bijasn51647 жыл бұрын
sir the lecture was great
@Slacademia7 жыл бұрын
BIJAS N thanks a lot!
@NeonNotch7 жыл бұрын
So with the eigenfunctions, do they always have to be given or can they be derived from H(psi) = E(psi)? My understanding of eigenfunctions is a bit slim but I know that trig functions and exponentials usually yield eigen functions. How do you know which to use, and when?
@NeonNotch7 жыл бұрын
To clarify, I think I've seen k=p/hbar or (sqrt(2mE/hbar)) for equation such as e^(i(kx-wt)) but that should yield something like cos(kx-wt) + isin(kx-wt) rather than Asin(kx)+Bcos(kx). Are we normalizing to get the latter, real function provided above, or is the former a completely different eigenfunction?
@isacnewton1526 жыл бұрын
Nice vidéo thank you for you effort
@thejswaroop52304 жыл бұрын
it triggers me a bit that x=0 is not at origin
@shreyashreesarkar51416 жыл бұрын
Sir is y = asin kx + bcos kx tge general wave equation?
@abdullahismail27706 жыл бұрын
Standing wave I guess
@shreyashreesarkar51416 жыл бұрын
Sir is y = asin kx + bcos kx a general wave equation?
@azice60346 жыл бұрын
Yes I believe so
@دياناسفيان-خ6ن7 жыл бұрын
amazing....thank sooooo much \
@jamesbentonticer47064 жыл бұрын
You should definitely know how to integrate that! That's too important to just skip over and be hand fed the answer.
@Slacademia4 жыл бұрын
For an Engineering Physics class, definitely. These videos are for Physics for Life Science majors and typically only require small amounts of calculus if any.
@jamesbentonticer47064 жыл бұрын
@@Slacademia oh okay I didn't know that. I watched the video for the last part on probabilities and I found it very helpful, thank you.
@Slacademia4 жыл бұрын
@@jamesbentonticer4706 All good, it's quite unclear from the video itself (these are old and got more attention than initially expected). Thanks!
@physicsperadox78496 жыл бұрын
U r god. Subscribed
@sachinduhan30226 жыл бұрын
Liked and subbed by buildothon.. A very nice video..
@Slacademia6 жыл бұрын
BuildoThon thanks:)
@sachinduhan30226 жыл бұрын
You welcome and kindly do the same.. It will be really sweet of you..
@kislaykunal89217 жыл бұрын
i just found enlightenment ....
@johnlloydcalisi32574 жыл бұрын
it's either you are interested or you have an exam XD
@erayschulz17825 жыл бұрын
how are you writing that lmao
@farhantejani82875 жыл бұрын
im going to report you bully
@erayschulz17825 жыл бұрын
Farhan Tejani on gawd?
@eaglevision137 жыл бұрын
(2Pi)
@sachinpathak1005 жыл бұрын
nice video but many time use different notifications, 1 or I, 2or II, 3 or III.