Most cogent explication of an aspect of that Sellars paper I have encountered this far - thank you - very helpful
@台男波哥Ай бұрын
1:15 coherentism 1:35 doesn't have to be an asymmetric relation 2:15 e.g. capital of France is Paris 3:10 circular? 3:30 notion of coherence 4:05 minimal coherence: don't contradict each other 6:05 actively support each other, deductive argument, probability, explain 7:25 quantify coherence 8:00 problem: Mary stole my money, not a terrible problem 11:45 compare to foundationalist 12:35 more famous problem: sufficient for justification? Lord of the ring 14:25 conspiracy theory, secret lizard men from outer space 15:55 how coherence connects to truth? 16:40 coherentist: this is a problem for everyone 18:25 coherentist: how big is this problem really 19:55 psychosis, conspiracy theory 21:35 it sounds easier than it is to come up with examples of really coherent false belief systems 21:50 different experience, different coherent system, is this ok? 22:45 special role of experience, my belief is that experience is not a good guide towards the truth 23:45 toward fundationalist 24:50 pure coherentist, Kantian move 26:10 does that mean there are no problems for coherentism?
@lurb155710 ай бұрын
This series has really helped me. When will you release the next episode?