Nasa & SpaceX Officially Announced New Falcon Heavy Launch Date 2024!

Nasa & SpaceX Officially Announced New Falcon Heavy Launch Date 2024!
===
00:00: Intro
00:45: Falcon Heavy’s new schedule
03:43: Skepticism on Falcon Heavy
05:36: Falcon Heavy's potential
10:00: Conclusion
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #launch
==
Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: [e-mail]
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
www.patreon.com/GreatspaceX?f...
Our video content is referenced by video sources at these sites:
HUGE THANKS TO:
Roblox Aero Space eXploration: / @robloxaerospaceexplor...
Stanley Creative: / @stanleycreative
Ryan Hansen Space: / ryanhansenspace
/ ryanhansenspace
@Considercosmos: / considercosmos
Cosmic Perspective: / @cosmicperspective
SLS (Space Launch System): / scottlikessls
Tony Bela : / infographictony
===
Nasa & SpaceX Officially Announced New Falcon Heavy Launch Date 2024!
Nearly half a year has elapsed, and while the Falcon 9 and Starship programs continue to gain momentum, the Falcon Heavy-a rocket that garnered considerable anticipation-has yet to take its first step forward.
However, I'm thrilled to announce that the Falcon Heavy is poised to rejoin the fray. NASA has just officially confirmed its first mission of the year, signaling the dawn of a promising new chapter for this rocket.
So, when can we expect the Falcon Heavy to blast off? How will it evolve over the course of the year? And will its role within SpaceX undergo any transformations?
Join us as we explore these questions on today's episode of Great SpaceX.
Nasa & SpaceX Officially Announced New Falcon Heavy Launch Date 2024!
As we bid farewell to 2023, a year marked by unprecedented activity, Falcon Heavy was poised to make significant advancements in the year ahead, much to the anticipation of many.
True to expectations, SpaceX has ambitious plans for Falcon Heavy this year. While the number of launches may not rival that of 2023, each mission holds immense importance.
Nasa & SpaceX Officially Announced New Falcon Heavy Launch Date 2024!
The first milestone for Falcon Heavy this year will be the launch of the GOES-U satellite for NASA and NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). This marks the tenth mission for Falcon Heavy to date. Initially slated for late April and subsequently pushed to May, recent updates from NASA confirm the launch date for June 25.
This isn't merely a plan anymore-it's officially confirmed. Falcon Heavy's tenth launch is scheduled for 5:16 PM ETC on June 25 at Launch Pad LC-39A.
----
We use images and content in accordance with the KZbin Fair Use copyright guidelines: kzbin.infoen/about...
Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: [e-mail]
To be resolved, thank you.

[@aaaaa5272]

Nice with a header that is correct, meaning reflect the content.

[@nelsonlanglois9104]

Boeing Starliner = Boeings Governmental Welfare Meal Ticket

[@colonbina1]

😂😂😂

[@patmcnally6]

BOEING'S Government Snap Benefits. Welfare

[@alangable9555]

YES!!!

[@richfranklin5536]

Absolutely it will be here at least 5 more years

[@stephensfarms7165]

Thanks great video and enjoyed watching. 👍👍 Falcon HVY, will be around many more years.

[@colonbina1]

♥️♥️♥️

[@tomhoskins4913]

Yes!!! Another arrow in SpaceX's quiver!

[@colonbina1]

Let's wait this rocket make new feats this year

[@getone007]

YES

[@colonbina1]

👍👍👍

[@garyrooksby]

Great vid, Kevin.

[@colonbina1]

Thanks Gary!!!

[@davidroberts5602]

Hi Kevin of great 👍 space x I’d say yes 👍 to falcon heavy it can 👌 do a lot more than it currently does David 🇬🇧❤️❤️👍👌🚀

[@brentsmithline3423]

Yes

[@rcstellman]

Yes, FH has 100 percent of the current demand. The SLS has only launched once and it is not reused.

[@colonbina1]

That set SpaceX apart from the rest

[@johngrimley3523]

Falcon 9 and falcon heavy will be around for a long time.

[@colonbina1]

Exactly

[@frankmcgowan9457]

We will see. The economics of Starship might just force F9 and FH out of business. We cannot know until SH/SS are in routine operation.

[@tedgramlich691]

Yes!

[@donaldhaldenbaughman5967]

Great

[@colonbina1]

🚀🚀🚀

[@patmcnally6]

Yes ✅️✅️✅️✅️✅️✅️

[@garylcamp]

Yes. FH will be used because SS is not ready nor proven and F9 is not big enough for some projects and in fact is scheduled for several for that reason. Reliability and it is by itself very good, it is made up of F9 which is great. Would you ride the 1st SS or a F9?

[@PazMaryaH]

🙌🙌🙌

[@jpmackin]

We give you permission to stay motivated…

[@colonbina1]

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@curtisquick1582]

There is no need for Falcon Heavy going forward. Performance improvements to the Falcon 9 make the Falcon Heavy less necessary and the capabilities of Starship will make Falcon Heavy unnecessary.

[@mikefesh4052]

Why limit it to the star ship.... use all the tools in your tool belt......

[@contestvoter]

Yes, Heavy and Dragon XL are made to resupply the lunar gateway, a mission for which Starship would be overkill.

[@111superman111]

Sure.

[@rogerrussell9544]

Can you imagine a starship heavy for launching heavy loads to mars?

[@michaelreid2329]

If orbital refuelling and assembly is involved

[@genemetz1945]

What is the best location to watch this launch?

[@colonbina1]

Let's go and find it

[@ftswarbill]

*No. It will be completely discontinued by the end of 2025 because of Starship IMO.*

[@michaelweir1003]

Yes! it too valuable of a bridge between the F9 and Starship.

[@colonbina1]

👍👍👍

[@charleswaters455]

See you on the water in Cocoa!

[@Abdullahhussain38416]

Yes! Because it has the payload capacity that NASA, US Government, etc. Wants. It is the fact a customer need FH to launch 10 ton+ satellite to GTO not a 100 tones LV like Starship. It is also fact that the launch pace of Falcon Heavy in 2023, Will be rare and you seen closely. The launches put tension in the launch schedule of rocket from LC-39A .

[@colonbina1]

Great analysis👍

[@Abdullahhussain38416]

​@@colonbina1 Thank you

[@Abdullahhussain38416]

But it is not analysis it is the reality.

[@Abdullahhussain38416]

Launches of Falcon Heavy can increase in the future if more commercial Comsats are launch for commercial customers like Eutelsat, Intelsat, Inmarsat, Viasat, etc.

[@otpyrcralphpierre1742]

First! At Last!

[@colonbina1]

It's coming

[@gregkelly2145]

Yes. I'm giving it 2 years.

[@colonbina1]

What do you mean?

[@gregkelly2145]

@@colonbina1 I think Falcon Heavy will be valid and in discussion for 2 more years. By that time, Starship will be significantly cheaper.

[@TheMrSquirrell]

Yes, two to three years max. Starship will replace.

[@colonbina1]

👍👍👍

[@PeteSty]

FH at least 5 more years

[@ackling]

A noooooo haha 😂

[@colonbina1]

😂😂😂

[@kwichzwellbreck697]

2023 saw 5 launches only because several where delayed from 2022. Furthermore Falcon Heavy isnt needed for most missions which can almost all be done by F9. Only if you have a very heavy object, need lots of delta v or a very high orbit or a combination of the three then you need Falcon Heavy. And F9s launch cadence has been increased so much because SpaceX's biggest costumer wants more launches = SpaceX needs more Starlink satellites in orbit 😂😂😂😂😂 and as Starship is "delayed" to bring them up so F9 must take the workload. Thank God F9 boosters are now certified for 20 flights ^^.

[@robertf3479]

I believe Falcon 9 is now certified for up to 40 flights. They just landed one for the 21st time with no hiccups.

[@kwichzwellbreck697]

@@robertf3479 Yes and no. They want to get the certification for 40 flights but are still in the process to obtain it. The boosters are still "just" certified for 20 launches. If I understood it right the certification is mostly an insurance document for mishaps and not a document for being allowed to fly.

[@paulboger3101]

Will Heavy be able to compete against Bozo Origin's New Glenn?

[@claytonroyes8141]

No

[@colonbina1]

Why do you think so?

[@JamesWhite-yj7sd]

it sounds like your always dogging spacex

[@wbwarren57]

Why develop Starship? Who will use it? This Falcon Heavy launch will carry 2 satellites SOON instead of years from now before Starship has its first customer. What customers will use Starship when they can use the MUCH more PROVEN dependable Falcon Heavy or Falcon 9?

[@colonbina1]

SpaceX have many potential. Together, Starship and Falcon rockets will make new glories for SpaceX

[@wbwarren57]

@@colonbina1 Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy are GREAT! Still skeptical about Starship - don't see where they will get enough customers to recover the Starship development costs. I definitely DO NOT believe that Starship will be "rapidly reusable". I think, like the Space Shuttle, the second stage will require detailed inspections and repairs after every flight. But, if Starship is NOT rapidly reusable, then a lot of the supposed potential uses for it will not be economically viable. It will just be a very heavy lift vehicle to low earth orbit. It will not get us to the Moon or Mars.

[@Sean-C]

No and a big thumbs down!

[@wbwarren57]

An assessment of Elon Musk: Amateurishness is one of Elon’s dominant traits. He has never learned a profession and basically has always remained an outsider in all fields of endeavor. Like many self-taught people, Elon has no idea what real specialized knowledge really means. Without any sense of the complexities of any great task, he boldly assumes one function after another. Unburdened by standard ideas, his quick intelligence sometimes conceives unusual measures which a specialist would not have hit on at all. The victories of the early years of Elon’s business career can literally be attributed to his ignorance of the rules of the game and his layman's delight in decision making. Since opposing sides were trained to apply rules which Elon’s self-taught autocratic mind did not know and did not use, he achieved surprises. These audacities, coupled with financial superiority, were the basis of his early successes. But now that setbacks have occurred he has suffered shipwreck, like most untrained people. Now his ignorance of the rules of the game are revealed as another kind of incompetence; now his defects are no longer strengths. The greater the failures become, the more obstinately his incurable amateurishness comes to the fore. The tendency to wild decisions has long been Elon’s forte; now it is speeding his downfall. NOTE: This is a paraphrase of the assessment of Hitler that Albert Speer (a German architect who served as the Minister of Armaments and War Production in Nazi Germany during most of World War II) wrote in his memoirs, “Inside the Third Reich”. This was quoted in the video entitled “207 - Manstein Goes Great War Style - WW2 - August 13, 1943” on the KZbin channel with the title of “World War Two”.

[@clmcoclmco2222]

wow hate much?

[@wbwarren57]

@@clmcoclmco2222 Hate, no. Not like con men? Yes. I'm tired of seeing Elon defraud the public and the government.

[@aaaaa5272]

@@wbwarren57 How can you write such hate and claim that's not hate?!? MAGA?!?

[@paulr4353]

That is just a four paragraph rant the could have been compressed into one line. "I dislike Elon Musk, and will not give him any credit for his successes"

[@wbwarren57]

@@aaaaa5272 Elon is a con man. If you don't think so, I'll pay for a ticket for you on the Hyperloop and a ticket to the Martian Colony that Elon promised to found years ago.

[@user-ji5to1ph6r]

Dattrax gaming give cheenl back

[@SKnight1968]

Yes!

[@colonbina1]

♥️

[@cubscoutman]

Yes

[@colonbina1]

❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@DomLaz1]

YES!

[@colonbina1]

☺️☺️☺️

[@bo-katankryze6808]

Yes

[@colonbina1]

♥️♥️♥️

[@JonWestwood]

Yes

[@colonbina1]

♥️