Please substitute "stripe" with "strip" every time I say it :)
@andrewtaylor97992 жыл бұрын
Great video. Thanks for the geometric intuition; I needed a refresher. The complex exponential is often very convenient for modeling radio frequency communication signals in electrical engineering applications.
@trogdorbuАй бұрын
Love this! One small thing to help disambiguate your explanation in the latter half of the video: use the word "strip" instead of "stripe". "Stripe" connotes an element of design/style and without consideration of size, whereas "strip" connotes a generic element almost always of a particular width. Compare the term "critical strip" in the Riemann hypothesis. So in both the right and left hand planes, you've used green "stripes" (design element, width irrelevant) to style the areas of interest, but on the left hand planes, it is the "strip" (section of fixed width) that falls between iπ and -iπ that is what is mapped to by the logarithm.
@brightsideofmathsАй бұрын
Oh, thank you very much. I was not aware of this difference :)
@seankim94942 жыл бұрын
I just wanna say thank you for your channel, I've been watching your manifolds series and it's an absolute masterpiece.
@brightsideofmaths2 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@mfarae25042 жыл бұрын
This video series is absolutely amazing. I am taking Complex analysis this semester as an engineering major and your videos cover everything we studied so far. If possible, please do make videos on next topics such as complex integration like Cauchy integrals, recap on path integrals, etc.
@brightsideofmaths2 жыл бұрын
They will definitely come :)
@nikosspanos1036 Жыл бұрын
WTF man! You explain things that have never been mentioned to my university. I love you !
@alexanderkononov1862 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic videos both in English and German, defintitely will watch a lot of your courses & videos in the future. Keep it up!
@brightsideofmaths Жыл бұрын
Awesome, thank you!
@gutzimmumdo49102 жыл бұрын
cool video altou from 7:19 i think theres a bunch of asumptions like; "what is a branch", "why does that vertical line gets map to the circle" maybe i missed or is goin to get covered latter dono, thanks anyway great course so far.
@brightsideofmaths2 жыл бұрын
We know the complex exponential function from former videos very well :)
@AJ-et3vf2 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thank you!
@ZeothGames3 ай бұрын
"Ah yes, such a simple function. Let's make every question in the exam so that you need to use this function very creativly for a chance to solve it!" My Professor probably.
@brightsideofmaths3 ай бұрын
That was not me :D
@arghyachakraborty11512 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation!It would be really helpful if you recommend some interesting book...
@brightsideofmaths2 жыл бұрын
In my opinion every book about complex analysis is good. Just pick the one that suits your style.
@darthtleilaxu40212 жыл бұрын
Merci !
@OvercookedOmlette2 ай бұрын
Impeccable video! I wanted to ask why having the pink lines at iπ and -iπ translates to pink line on the negative side of the real numbers?
@brightsideofmaths2 ай бұрын
Thanks! It's the definition of the complex exponential function.
@olivermechling7975 Жыл бұрын
10/10 explanation
@brightsideofmaths Жыл бұрын
Very nice. Thanks :)
@AHeroOfAzeroth Жыл бұрын
Hi thanks for the video! I have a question I understand e^iy lies on the circle but what about e^xe^iy this doesnt lies on the circle right?
@ridnap2 жыл бұрын
I love your videos! Thank you very much for your content, it helps more than you can Imagine! I dont know if the comments of the Complex Analysis series is the right place to tell you this, but I have really been missing a video about the Riesz Interpolation Theorem for example in the fu ctional analysis series. Do you plan on adding further episodes to older series or are they finished?
@brightsideofmaths2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I still add new videos to functional analysis :)
@Jaylooker2 жыл бұрын
The complex exponential map looks like a circle inversion
@StratosFair Жыл бұрын
Why not include, say, the line y=iπ in the domain of exp ? That way it's image is the whole complex plane (minus zero) and the function is still bijective. Is it because we absolutely want the domain to be an open set ?
@StratosFair Жыл бұрын
Ah, nevermind, just saw the end of the video about the continuity of log
@MathCuriousity Жыл бұрын
hey just learning about "complex" stuff and I have a question: When we are given a question with say a complex root we need to find or a complex log, which one of them is actually defining the other where when we have that one as a question, we must choose the inverse's tree branch cutting?
@brightsideofmaths Жыл бұрын
Complex root means a given branch usually.
@MathCuriousity Жыл бұрын
@@brightsideofmaths right but I watched your logarithm video (and admittedly I haven’t had any serious complex exposure), and I am just wondering: is the complex logarithm defined based on defining the complex exponential or is the complex exponential defined based on the complex logarithm?
@brightsideofmaths Жыл бұрын
@@MathCuriousity We first defined the complex exponential :)
@MathCuriousity Жыл бұрын
@@brightsideofmaths Ah ok! It probably is a bad idea for me to jump right to complex logs and complex exponentials before learning complex analysis from beginning right? I honestly was upset that I could not take the log of a neg number when learning about logs and I went down the rabbit hole and it led me here! I am going to continue my quest to understand complex log ! So neither the complex exponential nor the complex log are well defined right? So the whole point is finding a way to make them well defined? Or is it that we want to make complex log and complex exponential inverses of one another? (Or is it both)? Thank you Love you!
@brightsideofmaths Жыл бұрын
@@MathCuriousity Of course, we define the functions in the correct way here. Just watch the first 14 parts of my Complex Analysis course :D
@benbadman123 Жыл бұрын
Im slightly confused on the way you explained the periodicity of the exponential for complex values. What did you mean by we need to 'define' PI/2 such that it is the smallest real x such that cos(x) is 0? Isn't this already the case?