Thanks for watching everyone! Please help support me making these videos by joining my channel and/or giving the video a thumbs up. This encourages KZbin to share my video, so I make more advertising revenue (which is still less than it costs me to make these videos... but I love making them), and I can make more of these. Cheers!
@NoManClatuer-pd8ck5 ай бұрын
@@PaulStewartAviation May the algorithm be with you
@PaulStewartAviation5 ай бұрын
cheers :D
@newflyer68375 ай бұрын
thanks!
@tsechejak75984 ай бұрын
Highly unlikely the F-117 shot down in 99 over Serbia was because of the bomb doors being open. Is it possible the plane was located over target due to this yes, but the doors wouldn’t be open long enough for the missile to track on the F-117. Likely all that was needed were multiple mobile radars moved to general carelessly repeated flight path locations, in this way they could “burn through” the stealth advantage both being knowingly close to the aircraft heard flying overhead - (remember they knew fairly accurately the timing and heading of the flight so they can roughly know where in the sky the jet is from sound. f-117 are still loud especially overhead as they flew over where I lived in NM frequently in the 90s). therefore if they know audibly where in the sky the radar can be focused to that area, multiple close radar’s especially pointed at rear of F-117 where its not as stealthy as the front, and they can get more frequent blips through raw power of closer radar scans. Even close by the radar might not be able to get consistent track but launching multiple SAMs, very close, at least one SAM would be close enough its own tracking radar would get consistent enough return as its radar energy is too powerful to be fully redirected away. Another plausible case that still requires having accurate prediction of timing and flight path of the F-117 was the rumor that even though the Serbs shot it down with a older SAM system, the Serbs added a more modern IR and optical manual sigting capability that might not work against the F117 further out due to it having reduced IR, however again knowing where to look especially in comms with other listening teams, train the IR sight on known small area of the sky and its plausible on even the F-117 to spot a small heat plume of turbulent air behind the exhausts, and this could also aid inlaunching multiple SAMs, while those SAMs would still require being launched close to thr aircraft so that they can get strong radar return. The key to all of this is rumors being true that NATO command carelessly had F-117 pilots fly same routes in and out many nights repeatedly, and even dramatically worse another rumor stating that some nights EA-6 prowler jammers were not tasked to cover F-117s which they were used in addition to the stealth of the F-117 in very high threat dense radar areas. Also the Serbs tied low frequency approach warning radar to SAM systems, which can enable tracking somewhat on the F-117 but not able to target lock the plane, but again it could aid in getting IR or taeget radar aimed manually. Overall point is complacency away from normal F-117 tactics of planning constantly changing routes and timing is a problem especially combined with further rumors of a lot of spies/plane spotters at Aviano AB seeing F-117s take off and the timing of this being communicated to the Serbs! There are reports hinted at by an F-117 pilot from that war stating that on a certain mission an F-117 co-flight was successfully hit by SAM a second time though that plane made it back to base damaged. There are interviews posted if you search for second F-117 shot over Serbia. The state paraphrased is a nighthawk pilot saw several SAMs launch right in the target area a fellow nighthawk pilot was on timing to be flying and he saw one of the SAMs exlpode. He suspected trouble. Later on the egress both pilots were suposed to meet up at the same tanker but only the interviewed pilot got there on time. After fueling he told the tanker he’d stay with the tanker to wait for thr other F-117. After a long wait a somewhat slow F-117 made it up to tank. It seemed as though the F-117s comms where down or not allowed ro radio at all but should communicate wpwith tanker when plugged in to thr fuel probe, yet supposedly no comms with tsnker either when plugged in. The nighthawk seemed to have great difficulty lining up and plugging in to the tanker as well and then when flying away, again looked slightly unstable like there was some flight control damage or systems damage even if not external, a close explosive concussion might damage the actuator mechanisms/motors in the wing or tail control surfaces. The interviewed pilot however never heard a confirmation which is odd in a small F-117 community, unless the supposed shot at pilot was not allowed to discuss the incident. The interviewed pilot didn’t reveal anything either, he simply stated what he saw both the missile exploding and also the facts about his friend showing up late to tanker and struggling to get to the tanker boom, it was more or less hinting at it without directly stating. Handland I believe is the last name of thr pilot interviewed.
@1337flite3 ай бұрын
Is that a Vulcan wing at 14:37?
@davidcole3335 ай бұрын
Remembering how secret this thing was when it came out, it's almost unbelievable to me that you can now actually sit in the cockpit of one. This was a real treat.
@evanmurphy24735 ай бұрын
I was just about to say the same thing. I saw it at an airshow back then and it was surrounded by armed guards. My dad said "son they'll shoot you if you cross that line."
@reggieziet5 ай бұрын
A lot of it is still secret, and I bet a lot of foreign agencies will be seeing this video too, just in case they could learn something, its worth the try XD Still feels crazy to have access to this kind of footage.
@girodavivere5 ай бұрын
I saw one at an air show in the late 90s or early 2000s and you couldn’t get close or take pictures.
@owensparks50135 ай бұрын
I remember seeing one at an airshow in the UK. It was the only plane that had armed guards. At the time, I remember wondering if it was misdirection as it did look a bit like a plywood mockup.
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent5 ай бұрын
@@reggieziet A lot of them wouldn't be able to gain much. The aircraft fly by wire is nothing new, and anyone with some expertise can create the overall design of the F-117. Perhaps not as effective. Her real prize is the coating that was used on her which none of the museum craft will have, The eternal tech such as radar and other US computer systems which likely would be highly advanced even now, The Engine performance of course. The material used that assisted with the coating. I pointed out overall shape but its very unlikely any current power except maybe Japan and some in Europe could recreate the designs of the F-117 and replicate it. The Stealth fighter was designed based on years of testing of other designs before her. As a result the fighter has a very unique design and choices that would be difficult to replicate and more importantly the fighter is so unstable you need a top of the line computer system to keep her in stable flight. I believe the Chinese stealth bomber the H-20 suffers from this given that it was supposed to be a flying wing but its overall design from concepts and models seen indicates that it has stability issues and that its severe enough they had to give it a hybrid design that gave it a tail in certain times in flight indicating a flight issue.
@NeverlostatBSgaming5 ай бұрын
The F-117 is literally low poly stealth, and its an icon worthy of preservation
5 ай бұрын
4-bit textures suitable for downloading over 7200 baud modems.
@SuLokify5 ай бұрын
It's such a perfect representation of the aerospace engineering practices of the time. Just a bit early for computational fluid dynamics, just modern enough for real "off the shelf" economics, and a good first try for iterative development
@gpluslagauchiasse5 ай бұрын
A radical design. Such a beauty. I'm sure they are working on a modernized F-117 right now.
@Andreas-gh6is2 ай бұрын
the reason for the low-poly-ness was that the computers optimizing the shape couldn't process much geometry.
@John-wd5cb2 ай бұрын
Actually is a small B2.
@chrismoody13425 ай бұрын
I truly never expect such a close up and personal tour. I had seen the stealth back in its operational days at an AF Open House. There was no getting even close to the plane at that time. Now here we are close enough touch and inspect nearly every nuance of the planes airframe. Not only that but in the drivers seat look at the systems. Incredible job Paul. Every time you post I watch. It doesn’t matter old or new I love everything about aviation.
@vatoencabronadoАй бұрын
Back in 1993, I was in high school and our physics teacher got us a tour at Holloman AFB in Alamagordo, NM, and they took us into an F-117 hangar and let us climb up and look into the cockpit. I thought the planes were brand new, as we had never seen them until the first Gulf War, but the paint in the cockpit had scratches and I was surprised how worn it looked, and asked when it was made. The pilot told us that it was made in 1983, if I recall. Ironically, they had one at the Amigo Air Show on static display shortly thereafter, and they had the ropes set way back with armed guards.
@Samuraistar923 ай бұрын
I really want to thank you for taking your time to post this. My boyfriend was a senior engineer who worked on this plane. He passed away in 2019 and I can't ask him about it anymore. I'm glad you took the time for this so I can learn more about this plane after my boyfriend's death. He was very proud with his involvement in this project and he lives on through this.
@PaulStewartAviation3 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing. I hope this video helps you to feel closer to your boyfriend.
@tom5051666Ай бұрын
is he still your boyfriend if he is dead?
@Samuraistar92Ай бұрын
@tom5051666 As stated in my post above he passed away.
@TechnoEsotericaАй бұрын
@@Samuraistar92 I'm sorry you had to receive such a reply from a goblin like Tom. I'm sorry for your loss.
@iwin1833Ай бұрын
@@Samuraistar92Tom is searching for attention he is that pitiful . Sorry for your loss
@danielgetter59935 ай бұрын
I stumbled upon this video as a KZbin recommendation. Great work! My father worked on the F-117 as maintenance officer in the 'black" times and on through Desert Storm and the relocation to New Mexico.Two notes: RAM is is radar absorptive material, not absorbent. Dad always stressed that for whatever reason haha. And yes, the putty was a huge pain for the maintenance crews. The F-117 shared a large number of parts with other aircraft. That served two purposes. To reduce costs, as you note. But more importantly, it buried the purchases in the Air Force logistics system and help conceal the black project from notice. Thanks for the great video! The F-117 will always be my hero aircraft too. It was strange not knowing a thing about what Dad was doing growing up. But knowing he worked on one of the coolest projects in the world at the time always fills me with pride for him.
@uv77754 ай бұрын
To add to that. RAM in my experience did not need to be temperature controlled. FYI
@MC.44 ай бұрын
The RAM was a carcinogen and the birth defect rate of babies born to maintenance personnel at Holloman AFB skyrocketed due to exposure to RAM.
@kinch6133 ай бұрын
@@MC.4that started at TTR. Yes it was indeed.
@nik4546Ай бұрын
Your dad was in Area 51?
@Gator_Bait_Motorsports2 ай бұрын
I visited the USAF museum at Wright-Patterson AFB a few years ago. The F-117 there has an interesting story told to me by one of the museum curators. A group of Russian "tourists" were visiting the Museum. Some one was watching their actions and very close inspection of the F-117. After the group had gone, they noticed the wings had scrap marks on them. Someone had tried to get a sample of the special coatings used on the F-117. The curator chuckled and said the coatings had been removed and replaced with a coat of rustoleum flat black paint. I'm sure they were disappointed with their samples when they were inspected in a Russian lab....LOL
@CharlesHuse2 ай бұрын
I dunno....might wanna check and see if there was a spike in orders Rustoleum flat black paint going to unusual destinations a few months after.
@blackhawkuАй бұрын
Wow 😂
@brianmaitai768529 күн бұрын
Hah Ha...I was just thinking that...Some Chinese "Tourist" with a small hacksaw or chisel accidentally leaning on the damn thing and taking a sample. Remember the Chinese guy who plucked off an arm from a robot prototype, placed in his pocket and took off "walking quite rapidly!"
@richbattaglia535015 күн бұрын
Sneaky fuckers.
@esshoul3 күн бұрын
Didnt one crash in Serbia? The paint and other tech was likely leaked to China/Russia back then so your story seems fake
@chrissakal5325 ай бұрын
I had the F-117 poster too! I still remember around the first Gulf War (90/91) when the Stealth Fighter was revealed. It was a big deal at the time. At airshows they were heavily guarded and you couldn't get remotely close to it. I actually got a couple of Blacksheep patches and a baseball cap from the guys visiting from Holloman AFB. Now it's possible to walk around, sit in it, and film the whole thing! It makes me feel old! From what I've read, the F-117 has been certified to refuel from the KC-46 now. So "retired"... makes one wonder.
@cruisinguy60245 ай бұрын
They’re retired buuuuut yet still maintained in climate controlled hangers and are still actively flown. Seriously an incredible aircraft even if it’s decades old at this point. Stealth design has advanced significantly since its construction and yet the USAF keeps them easily accessible so one must wonder if there’s more to the story than we know - perhaps they’ve undergone significant upgrades to reduce their RCS.
@sntslilhlpr66015 ай бұрын
@@cruisinguy6024 They have better coatings now. And with how much Russia has shown themselves to be a paper tiger I think it's worth it to keep some of them around for a total war situation. They may be obsolete compared to a few other aircraft but they are obviously not obsolete compared to our adversaries so why not keep a few of them around just in case? Imagine a few of them up the butt of this current Kursk breakthrough... I'm generally the type who detests war and wants spending to go down but I'm also a realist and know a bit about warfare so it's hard to blame them for keeping these birds in the air. Even after all these years, they're still effective.
@mikemontgomery26544 ай бұрын
I remember that time. First time I saw the 117 was just after the Gulf war. I couldn't believe they sent one up to my neck of the woods for display.
@macsmith20132 ай бұрын
The more people think they're "retired" the better.
@rocketpunchgo15 ай бұрын
Me in the Air Force while working on the flightline and an F-117 flies in: "don't look!" Paul Stewart on KZbin: "Check this out boys!"
@That_Stealth_Guy5 ай бұрын
🤣
@myst88175 ай бұрын
This always annoyed me being on the flightline. Official rule is you can't photograph aircraft taking off or landing, sounds good? Except for the plane spotters 30 ft outside the fence taking high quality photos on their big fancy cameras...😅
@That_Stealth_Guy5 ай бұрын
@@myst8817 "Common sense and logical thinking will NOT be tolerated.
@jumpingjeffflash99465 ай бұрын
One of these came to my base in Korea in 93', I worked w/a guy that came from that program when it was black. We crew chiefs got to get a look at it and I remember when i looked in the cockpit thinking...."this is so old and analog" reminiscent of the "A" model F-16's I used to crew. Amazing we made this tech way back when we did and kept it so secret.
@lsnead725 ай бұрын
@jumpingjeffflash9946 I was a load toad at Kunsan in '86.
@NatesRandomVideo5 ай бұрын
Seeing this thing no longer a secret tells this old guy the secret stuff today is truly mind-blowing.
@damionneranginui65465 ай бұрын
The exact specs were on my Commodore 64 stealth fighter game. This plane was a leap that is vital in today's planes. Shoutout to Ian. My mate from tamborine. He loves that B2
@restaurantattheendofthegalaxy5 ай бұрын
My brother was in the USAF security forces at Hill AFB in Ogden, UT, and in 1986 he and his whole squadron had to 19:49 go pickup all the mangled pieces of a crashed F-117 north of Bakersfield, CA. I was a Navy Ordinance man and we talked regularly, but he was required to sign and NDA because he'd handled the materials and we only talked about it much later. He also told me that they would blackout the base and a strip of Ogden's streetlights for F-117 approach and landing.
@PaulStewartAviation5 ай бұрын
fascinating!
@deanwilliams4335 ай бұрын
Utah streetlights are non existent as is lol
@mikekennedy16412 ай бұрын
I remember that well. Helicopters from Edward AFB and China Lake NAS were controlling the airspace above. Big news here at the time.
@staralliancefan12453 ай бұрын
Wow what a treat seeing inside the F-117! This was certainly off limits only a few years ago.
@voided764 ай бұрын
I went to the dayton airshow in 1991 or 2. There were F14 and 15 demos, which were my absolutely favorite marks of the day, but in fact: an F117 did a flyover to include a few laps, and a "knife edge" pass There was one on the ground as well, but no one could even get within 50 yards of the airframe. didn't stop a giant school circle crowd though. No one was obviously going to put one of these unstable guys at 90 degrees 500 feet off the deck but they did about 60 or 70 degrees and it was an incredible view as a 9 year old kid. So many never forget moments. :)
@SuLokify5 ай бұрын
The engineering and development of this thing is so neat. It's a great representation of several shifting paradigms in aerospace - complex computer modeling, the use of "off the shelf" solutions, and early hints of iterative development.
@applejacks9715 ай бұрын
When coming out of southern Arizona heading back to Omaha I'd come thru Alamogordo NM. I'd swing in to the Walmart parking lot with the truck and watch the F-117's do touch and goes at Holloman AFB. There were usually 4-5 running patterns at the same time. Cool stuff!!!
@karlchilders54202 ай бұрын
the F-117 that was shot down was detected for several reasons. 1. They flew without EA-6B Prowler jamming support, despite being warned not to. 2. They flew the EXACT SAME ROUTE that had been previously flown. This is a tactical no-no as EVERYONE is taught to vary your approach to a target to make it harder to shoot you down. 3. The plane was wet - it turns out this was an issue with this aircraft, in that when it was wet, it's radar signature increased to the point where it was detectable at longer ranges. 4. The plane opened its bomb-bay doors, and due to all those items previously mentioned, it made the 1960's era GOA SAM system able to shoot it down. That was AFTER the SAM battery fired a salvo and it shot the plane down because it flew that same route, and was hit not by being tracked, but by launching it and having it detonate near the jet due to the proximity fuse working as designed. They detected it, they were NOT able to track it. That doesn't help when, again, you fly the exact same route. So it wasn't a simple one-cause shootdown. There were multiple factors. What isn't widely known is that the USAF was READY to destroy the wreckage, but because there were Russian, Chinese, and other foreign national intelligence people there, they delayed that. The Chinese embassy took it inside, and THAT is why it got bombed later, although the bombing failed to destroy the wreckage. They hit the embassy after hours when it was not manned; that's why they did that vs. hitting the crowds of fools around it after the shootdown.
@creightonjasonАй бұрын
Agreed. The Chinese embassy got hit as the Chinese were passing radar information to the Bosnia (Serbs) - Yanks have a habit of doing that. They bombed the French Embassy in Libya as the French were passing info to the Libyans in real time when the yanks attacked Tripoli in revenge for a bombing in Berlin that killed a US service man
@qazwsxqaz3163Ай бұрын
Доводы интересны.
@brianmaitai768529 күн бұрын
Plus the SERBS used a Russian 2D VHF radar that can detect but cannot track stealth planes. They also practiced setting up and dismantling the SA-3 GOA short range missile system so one night they did move it and place it under the flight path of the Nighthawk where nobody suspected.
@mcarland5 ай бұрын
Awesome tour! I logged many, many hours on the MircoProse F-117A simulator in my youth.
@PaulStewartAviation5 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@pfsantos0073 ай бұрын
This. Me, on a lowly 386 running 40 MHz i believe. Pretty basic at the time. My buddy had a 486 and a soundcard!
@macsmith20132 ай бұрын
Same here, albeit on C64 and Amiga, not to mention bulding the Italeri plastic model kit when everyone still thought it was called the F-19 and had a vastly different shape. I'm kinda sad there are virtually no flight simulator comparable to the Microprose and Novalogic ones, just pure arcade stuff like Ace Combat or in depth sims like DCS but nothing in between.
@newflyer68375 ай бұрын
wow I had to do a double-take when I saw the video title! I've never seen such a close-up video of the F-117 and thought this was some other jet! Thanks for putting this together and the museums for letting you film it!
@PaulStewartAviation5 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@xdavid.williamsx24465 ай бұрын
My first Airframe when I was a young airman. Remember seeing one flying with a t-38 next to it when I started my drive down into the Alamogordo basin from the mountains. I was a weapons troop. It’s nice to see a detailed video of the old jet. 1998 was the last time I got to be around them before I went to the reserves. Thank you for your video.
@That_Stealth_Guy5 ай бұрын
Great job yet again Paul! There are a few details that are wrong, but not worth quibbling about honestly. Here's a fun little fact about 833 most people don't know, it once had a hydraulic failure on landing that caused the right brake to lock up , causing the tire to blow and the wheel to be ground down flat. Surprisingly, the magnesium the wheel is made of didn't ignite, otherwise it would have been one hell of a hot fire. It also, destroyed the right main landing gear follow-up door on that side as well. The last time I signed off any major maintenance on her was during the 10 hr inspections that came from missing fasteners on the inboard elevon that required a fleet wide grounding and inspection, as well as speed and g limits for the pilots to follow. Pretty sure I was the one who signed off on her final servicing pre flight inspections as well, since I was the only 7 level on mid-shift as we began retiring them. Best fact about the F-117A that other fighter crew chiefs will hate and deny. During 2006-2008 we had the highest FMC rate of all ACC aircraft. Not an easy feat to accomplish with a dwindling budget, shortage of personnel, parts and the smallest fleet out of them all. I have to Presidential Outstanding Unit awards to prove it. I still love my beautiful bundle of mismatched parts from all over the military parts bins.
@ninus175 ай бұрын
Thats awesome. Excuse my ignorance but what is the FMC and ACC at the end you are referring to?
@C-L-A-W5 ай бұрын
@ninus17 FMC=Fully Mission Capable. Essentially, it had nothing mechanically wrong that affected its ability to perform its mission. You also have others code such as PMC=Partially Misson Capable which are inop sub systems that may affect some aspects of the plane but is still overall flyable and the worst which is NMC=Not Mission Capable which means the planes broke. We base maintance statistics based off several factors but we strive to have a high FMC rate across a fleet. ACC=Air Combat Command. It's the MAJCOM (Major Command) responsible for Air Combat Operations.
@That_Stealth_Guy5 ай бұрын
@@C-L-A-W Thanks for explaining what I should have done. Regardless of age, once you've been in the military (especially the US military) Acronyms become such a common thing that you don't even notice you use them. Even when talking to current friends who work professionally in general aviation maintenance don't always get them.
@DareTheMachine5 ай бұрын
Awesome stories, thanks for sharing. Fun to see the maintenance parallels from the stealth world and mine as a former 7 level on AFSOC on birds. Cheers.
@ninus175 ай бұрын
@@C-L-A-W thanks 😊
@Primus545 ай бұрын
You can intuit just how much Kelly Johnson’s Skunk Works philosophy influenced this aircraft’s development by the borrowing of proven existing components from other aircraft. Excellent video, Paul. 👍👍👍
@mackslubnyy5 ай бұрын
While Kelly Johnson was present during the aircraft’s development, all the shots were called by Ben Rich who took over from Kelly, and this was his first new project
@Lex1uth3r4 ай бұрын
Remember seeing a couple of these come in to land at Ramstein during NATO's Operation Allied Force in 99. Only reason I even looked up for the first one was they sounded so different from the usual heavy lifter traffic. One of the coolest things I ever saw.
@PhilipMReeder5 ай бұрын
Im originally from St Louis Missouri. One early evening in 1989 (around Christmas time) I was walking home from work headed south through Tower Grove Park. The Sun had just set, the sky was crystal clear and violet black with fine pinpoint stars above. I heard the distinct sound of military jet engines approaching behind me from the north. I looked up and back and saw something very peculiar. Four aircraft flying wingtip to wingtip. The two outer planes had their anti collision lights on. They were easily identifiable by their silhouettes against the sky as F-15 Eagles. The others however, were not. They had no lights on at all. However their pitch-black color scheme against the deep violet night sky revealed their diamond shapes. Hmm, I thought. It was only a short while later that the F-117 was unveiled to the public, which when I saw it, understood. They apparently took off from Lambert Airport in St Louis County and were being escorted by the Eagles while flying in blacked out conditions. Ive often wondered how people waiting on board passenger flights at the airport looked out their window to watch the F-15's take off, and saw two black aircraft with no lights taking off as well.🤔
@benn4545 ай бұрын
Back when McDonnell Douglas was still around.
@NoManClatuer-pd8ck5 ай бұрын
@@PhilipMReeder Excellent story.
@matheusgoncalves90965 ай бұрын
Nice story... there are really beautiful and modern planes
@KyChristell4 ай бұрын
❤
@BaloneyFlaps5 ай бұрын
This was one of my childhood favorites as well. In the early 90s I lived in the desert outside of El Paso, TX, which isn't too far away from where these were based, at Holloman AFB in NM. My father and I frequently spotted them in the air around dusk, and I always thought it was cool that we couldn't really hear them very well until they had passed overhead. Thanks for the great close-ups!
@Slatsovrspeed3 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@PaulStewartAviation3 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@kinch6133 ай бұрын
That was my office back in the day. Beings back good memories! Happy to see them still flying out of TTR! Love the TR tailcode.
@PaulStewartAviation3 ай бұрын
You’d have a few stories I’m sure! 😃
@bluskytooАй бұрын
was it difficult to fly ?
@kinch613Ай бұрын
@ I wasnt a pilot sadly due to vision restrictions. I was an egress system specialist, which meant I fixed, maintained the explosives ejection seat and canopy thrusters!
@bluskytooАй бұрын
@ i wish i could remember this guys name, i knew him from C-130s and he was in Life Support. I ran into him at the NCO club in Nellis around 86 and he gave me a squadron patch of the 117. He said i wish i could tell you about this but i cant , hang on to this patch it will become a collector item in a couple years. I still have the patch. I was crew on C-130s from McChord at the time, i knew him from Pope AFB.
@lucasokeefe79355 ай бұрын
Taking a tour of the Boneyard in 2006 I got very annoyed when one of the guides called out an F-117 "stealth fighter" on the opposite side to where I was looking. I spun around to see an empty concrete slab with a plaque near it. I was 16, a nerd, and very gullible. Glad you can see them up close for real now! Amazing tech.
@moshunit965 ай бұрын
I like how it comes with custom luggage shaped like a bomb for the pilot.
@Bronwyn0315 ай бұрын
Travel pods are generally mounted on the external wing hardpoints of other aircraft. It must be aerodynamically shaped to alleviate unnecessary fuel costing drag. Everything about the Nighthawk was repurposed from existing hardware including those travel pods.
@BogeyTheBear4 ай бұрын
Oh, and then there are the training bomb pods. The F-117 carries two bombs. Big bombs. They may hit hard, but you won't get a lot of value in training your pilots if they can only drop twice while out on the training range. So, there's a pod in which you can install multiple 25-pound training bombs in the underbelly and have them drop out one at time. When this pod is mounted in the bomb bay, it will impart the same aerodynamic effect of a full-sized bomb, but you get to do more than one training shot on the range.
@crayoniii4 ай бұрын
Thanks for the tour! The Nighthawk has been my favorite plane since I was a boy. Its strange shape dazzled me like no other, a perfect flying gem with no sparkle whatsoever. How cool to now be able to experience one so intimately.
@TimberwolfCY5 ай бұрын
Fantastic video. Always fantasized about these as a kid. Incredible aircraft; had no idea so much of it came from other systems! Thank you!
@bks2525 ай бұрын
This was the last project my Dad worked on before retiring from Lockheed. He only told us about it after the aircraft was used in Panama. The old Lockheed could definitely keep a secret.
@beufa79905 ай бұрын
Salut de France 👋🏻🇫🇷👋🏻. Il y a 30 ans, j'avais les magazines et j'ai fabriqué la maquette du Nighthawk. Maintenant il est au musée, C incroyable.
@MagMan4x45 ай бұрын
I got to see these (and probably this exact jet) growing up on Holloman AFB in New Mexico as a kid. Running track and field at the middle school these would land right over my head.
@scottloftin75715 ай бұрын
Just yesterday I visited the F-117 at the Palm Springs Air Museum as seen in the video. It is well worth the tour. I kind of wish I watched this first. Great informative video.
@Kevin-mm6xmАй бұрын
The F-117 was debuted as a static display at Atlantic City International Airport during an airshow when first revealed to the public. There was an Air National Guard base there, probably still is, and they had it completely roped off to the public with 3 armed military guards with M-16 rifles surrounding it! It's just amazing to view the F-117 cockpit and then view the F-35 cockpit! Technology at it's finest!
@JahBushi5 ай бұрын
fun to see lots of A-10, F-16 and F/A-18 components!
@peeweebarney5 ай бұрын
And the B-52 parts.
@kevinburt445 ай бұрын
When I was in the RAF, there were various rumors of F117 aircraft tested at RAF Binbrook, a Lightning base. The theory was the 1 17 would take off between two Lightning taking off, at night only, thereby hiding the aircraft. It seems one may have crashed at RAF Boscombe Down in 1994, something had a mishap, and days later a fair number of US agencies aircraft were documented coming and going.
@edutwin2 ай бұрын
In 1993 I used to play Microprose's F19 stealth fighter sim on the Amiga 500 which featured the F117. It's amazing you can sit in a real F117.
@applejacks9712 ай бұрын
I have that very game new in the cellophane yet for my Apple IIe :) Good stuff!
@creightonjasonАй бұрын
Same here !
@saintuk705 ай бұрын
Awesome...... really do love your aircraft tours. The mention of the design being 40 yrs old, you can still see what is used today in the F22 and F35 with the jagged edge of the canopy, as an example. Oh, and at around 14:00 right next to a Vulcan too!!
@AnonymousFreakYT5 ай бұрын
Yep. Why "fix" the parts that don't matter for aerodynamics? Use the computer power to make the aerodynamics-important parts aerodynamic.
@macsmith20132 ай бұрын
Ha! I knew that wing root looked familiar. I'd love to visit this museum, but due to the current political circumstances, I doubt I'll be visiting the US anytime soon. :-\
@williamhammond39985 ай бұрын
Wow! I can't believe how well kept the cockpit is! It barely looks used. Super cool opportunity to see the cockpit of such an illustrious and secretive beast.
@lemmingsfly5 ай бұрын
The military took unused spare parts with anything sensitive and removed and installed those parts as you can see the second most flown plane wouldn't have shiny parts lol. It looks so nice because it was just finished being restored so they took all the wear marks from thousands of hours and painted them. And those shiny screens are identical to different fighter aircraft screens so easy swap. This one was restored at the SAC museum in Nebraska and I saw it. All the coating was removed and it was shiny like you get a glimpse of here.
@davidleitman4 ай бұрын
In toronto, one of my favorite memories was seeing the annual air show. I believe it was the 90's when I saw the F117 - it did a single pass and flew away, this intrigued me because every other plane took its time with 10-15 passes and lots of hosting.
@dewboy134 ай бұрын
Love all you do Paul, cant say thank you enough. Keep it up!
@PaulStewartAviation4 ай бұрын
Thanks, will do!
@jayson12702 ай бұрын
Loved watching these things take off from El Paso International REALLY low over Ft. Bliss all the time back in the day.
@Emlizardo5 ай бұрын
At some point in the F-117's development it was found that a lavender or pinkish color would make the aircraft least visible against a typical night sky. But the top brass took one look at that, shook their heads and said, "Just make it black."
@frostedbutts43405 ай бұрын
Batman would agree.
@razorbackblood065 ай бұрын
It was difficult enough to get fighter pilots to fly it as is, no pilot is signing up to fly a lavender or pink airframe.
@Emlizardo5 ай бұрын
@@razorbackblood06 Yeah, I've read that when pilots got their first look at it, most of them weren't exactly enthusiastic.
@Hebdomad75 ай бұрын
WW2 British SAS have entered the chat. They drove pink range rovers in the North African desert and gave Rommel hell.
@RobinHogg-j4d5 ай бұрын
Pink RAF attack aircraft were used in Desert Storm.
@exist4 күн бұрын
One of the engineers I went to school with, his father was part of team that did the RAM coating back then, unfortunately he passed away from an aggressive cancer in the early 2000's. He along with a few others from that unit passed away from similar illnesses. Really makes you think about what was really in that paint.
@Woger_Rilliams5 ай бұрын
First time I saw one of these in person was at an air show when I was a kid. It was literally cordoned off and surrounded by armed military guards. Funny to see you sitting in the cockpit.
@A_GoogleName4 ай бұрын
I saw one of these at an airshow once. Before you knew it, it was on top of you at low altitude. So, yes, they are quiet.
@chestercopperpot86474 ай бұрын
I grew up in Palmdale Ca. Near Edwards and Skunkworks. Seeing this and the SR-71 fly over would stop everyone in their tracks like a pretty woman walking by and all guys shut up for a second. 😂 I miss that
@sonniedewantoro648615 сағат бұрын
It's great to actually see a complete tour, while I only used to know this plane from a Game.
@heatherburger16665 ай бұрын
This was a long time coming video for me to watch about the F-117! I learned a ton and it was fun to watch. Thank you for this tour.
@PaulStewartAviation5 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@cameron381516 күн бұрын
Great video! This is also my favorite plane. Lots of great information, liked and subscribed.
@sar4x4745 ай бұрын
Hard to believe this was conceptualized in 1976. The Skunk Works story is a fascinating one.
@creightonjasonАй бұрын
Hitler had a stealth type plane which they looked at !! Mr H didnt know it was stealth and came way to late to be of any use
@Gitbizy5 ай бұрын
I was fortunate enough to see one of its very first airshow performances in the early 90’s… was an awesome experience to witness it. It flew right over me at the end of the runway several times. Thank you for this video.
@JoseGonzalez-ew6zz4 ай бұрын
I was at the crash site as a young airman . They had us spraying mop and glo on the plane to keep the particles from blowing around. You could see how the exhaust gasses were diffused at the back of the wing because the aircraft skin was burned away
@RedTail1-15 ай бұрын
I was mesmerized by the nighthawk as a kid. I heard it was a real challenge to fly.
@kenpumphrey83845 ай бұрын
I was an air traffic controller at Holloman AFB tower. Spent years working the stinkbugs around the pattern but I was never permitted to be anywhere near these jets. Over 20 years later I get an up close look at it.
@billirvin90575 ай бұрын
I was assigned to the Senior Trend program from 1986-89 while the program was still "black". I worked with the COMSEC custodian (keeper of the codes to scramble the radios, etc) and every 6 months we had to go sit in the cockpits and check the serial numbers on the encryption devices to make sure the airplanes had the ones they were supposed to have. An interesting assignment, no doubt, but the time away from home (fly up on Mon and come home Thur) was a deal breaker for a lot of marriages. Upon my retirement, I was presented a flag flown on the first daylight flight by Col Anthony Tolin.
@NoManClatuer-pd8ck5 ай бұрын
You had me at "COMSEC". Great story all around. Thank you👍🙂
@That_Stealth_Guy5 ай бұрын
Nice retirement present. I was assigned to them just after they arrived at Holloman, so sadly I missed the TTR shenanigans. However, those maintainers who transferred down there with the aircraft were the ones who gifted me with their knowledge on the systems of that jet. Some were the beyond definition of "subject matter experts" in the things they new. They are still among the best group of maintainers I've ever met and worked with.
@dpc1115 ай бұрын
I was there at the same time you were.
@LRRPFco525 ай бұрын
@@billirvin9057 What did you do prior to working up at Tonopah?
@billirvin90575 ай бұрын
@@LRRPFco52 I worked in base communications centers my first 6+ years at McClellan, George, Udorn, NKP, and Don Muang AB's (Thailand). After that, I spent a year at Shaw working in plans and programs in tactical communications. Spent a few years on flying status at Keesler and Hickam, 2 years in North Dakota as a contract monitor before going to TTR. 11 PCS moves in 20 years made for an interesting career but I think my family hated all the moves.
@mdsimpson715 ай бұрын
I got to see one of these beauties at my local airport when she had a technical issue and had to land....the amount of security around her was insane!!!
@RicArmstrong5 ай бұрын
Back in the late 90's a F117 crashed in Essex Maryland that was taking off from a local ANG base. The pilot safely ejected, but police and military completely locked down our neighborhood until every surviving piece of the aircraft could be recovered.
@DarkGodSeti4 ай бұрын
Thanks for this, like other have said, didn't think I'd ever see it this close even on video... much less than sit in the cockpit as well!
@jimw13105 ай бұрын
Awesome! I was so obsessed with this aircraft when i was younger. Thank you for the walk thru!
@PaulStewartAviation5 ай бұрын
My pleasure!
@michaelstern86575 ай бұрын
Two things of interest about the angles of the surfaces and how they deflect a radar signal. If you toss a tennis ball anywhere at the fuselage, the ball will never bounce back to you. Also, though bats aren’t completely blind, they do rely on the return of high frequency signals, to navigate. I have seen bats fly into the F-117 because their signals are deflected away.
@zacklewis342Ай бұрын
That's not how faceting works. If a tennis ball bounces off of a panel facing you, it will come back, obviously.
@davebarlow97132 ай бұрын
Good onya Paul. Great vid post listening to the "Fighter Pilot Podcast" Ep 72. It's interesting why it was designated a Fighter and the Pilot's nickname for the F117 is brilliant! 😳
@katout755 ай бұрын
One of the greatest stories about the F-117A is not about the aircraft but Lockheed program lead Ben Rich whose wife suddenly passed away from a heart attack in the middle of development (1980). Rich only took off two days for bereavement and burial, his Lockheed colleagues and two children were a little concerned about his state of mind but he explained the best way for him to cope with losing his wife was to get back into the tenacious technical challenges of his work. Rich's work ethic and commitment to the Skunk Works and the tremendous advances they made which brought Lockheed back into the tactical aircraft business.
@TooBiggoBritches5 ай бұрын
Sounds like Mr. Rich enjoyed stealth aircraft more than his own wife.
@paulb72075 ай бұрын
avoidant attachment style as one would expect from a top engineer ;-)
@jamesaguirre63765 ай бұрын
Not sure the sacrifice will be honored soon
@seanc67545 ай бұрын
Yeah he also gave a speech at UCLA where he told everyone there that "we have the means to take et home but it's locked behind black projects and it would take an act of God to release them to benefit humanity".. funny that someone in the shadows seems to be doing exactly that when it comes to all the uap hearings..
@Jonsoar-kk4lk4 ай бұрын
Gotta keep the military industrial complex, endless wars, and waste of taxpayer money going!
@FISSIONINITIATEDSUNRISE5 ай бұрын
A beautiful machine. Nothing will come close to the new upcoming f35 upgrade, but the nighthawk was a big step towards perfecting the technology.
@PumpUptheJam814 ай бұрын
One of these landed at RAF lakenheath when I was stationed there crewing F-15E’s. It was guarded by the MP’s and we couldn’t even get within 50 ft of the thing. Crazy to see it so up close and personal on KZbin of all things. What a world.
@AlanToon-fy4hg3 ай бұрын
In the Spring of 1990, after it had been officially unveiled, one was put on static display at (then) NAS Atlanta. It was roped off and there were armed Navy Master at Arms personnel posted inside. One had a 12 gauge shotgun! Little did I know that less than a year later it would be involved in combat in Operation Desert Storm....
@creightonjasonАй бұрын
Worked at Lakenheath in Kinghts table (I think thats what it was called) im from Risby
@cobra50872 ай бұрын
I was fortunate enough to see one at the Hamilton international airshow in the 90's. What an amazing piece of technology. It was cordon off just enough that you wouldn't be able to touch it. Also there were no guards stationed around it. So if someone wanted to they could sneak under the red rope and touch it lol!.
@harri98854 ай бұрын
Oh no, the good old days in the late 80´s and 90´s when Microprose made wonderful flight sims. No more Microprose.
@connycontainer94593 ай бұрын
Microprose has been bought by a former employer and has already published a few smaller titles. Not quite where they have been, but if they play their cards right, they might get back to publishing premium sims.
@yes_head5 ай бұрын
Thanks -- a rare bird to get this much of a close-up view. It's still so alien looking. That engine is relatively tiny, and it's amazing those exhaust ports could allow those things to get off the ground!
@samlai54115 ай бұрын
how did they manage to fit Steven Segal and everyone else in this plane in the movie "Executive Decision"?
@Sedan57Chevy5 ай бұрын
I am still impressed at what the engineers were able to do with this plane, when they did it. The fact that it is still one of the stealthiest designs out there, and remains to be used... Albeit off the books... Is just really cool. I've always been enamored by the view from the cockpit, so I can't imagine how cool it would be to actually experience that in person! Great video of what I would have to consider my childhood hero plane, too. Didn't have a poster, but I did have a model kit.
@santiagososa49805 ай бұрын
Gracias Amigo, exelente la explicación del f117. Salu2 dsd San Luis, Argentina 🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
@andrewthomson5 ай бұрын
Greetings neighbour! 🇫🇰
@jondoe942Ай бұрын
Out on the range, the F-117s used 55-gallon drums with the tops cut off as targets! True! It was easy to thread the needle without initially tipping over the drum!
@AnonymousFreakYT5 ай бұрын
13:40 - Correction, it's three times *an insect.* It's about _one third_ a small bird! (That diagram just puts animals first.) Even the F-35 (according to that diagram) has a radar visibility about half that of a small bird!
@LRRPFco525 ай бұрын
F-35 since Lot 4 frontal RCS is smaller than F-117A. F-117A has certain aspects that spike its return values. They were always looking for ways to reduce its signature though, so it isn't a set of static values. It went through 3 different iterations of RAM upgrades, for example. Its final RAM was similar to what was used on F-22A and was easier to maintain, more durable. Only a few got it though, with the grey paint scheme.
@shrimpflea5 ай бұрын
Insects are animals.
@peeweebarney5 ай бұрын
What about the F22?
@wj6252 ай бұрын
I just saw that plane in Nebraska a month ago. Not gonna lie, I’m pretty jealous you got to sit in it. I always wish I could go in the planes in the museum.
@timsamoa59445 ай бұрын
I used to fly this in the gulf war on my computer simulator. Go Microprose - What a dream to see one in person. Thanks for sharing.
@tmh17595 ай бұрын
You had us in the first half not gonna lie :D
@calvinnickel99955 ай бұрын
Played that game a lot too.. but we were attacking Iran, not Iraq.
@rikeralpha1005 ай бұрын
Thank you for your service 😂
@erics81925 ай бұрын
I miss old school mircroprose flight sims. Gunship 2000 was my favorite.
@timsamoa59445 ай бұрын
@@erics8192 a great game, I played on the c64 in the early 80’s then the remake on the pc. They don’t make em like that anymore.
@beejay76655 ай бұрын
I believe that the small holes at 2:30 are the static ports, which, along with the pitot tubes, make up the pitot-static system
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke5 ай бұрын
The Horten Ho-229 also has no tail.... or any other significant retro-reflective structures.
@heathertruskinger62145 ай бұрын
Pretty cool, Paul. It's great that's been declassified, so we can all get to see some of this beauty !😊
@ItsKing325 ай бұрын
3:52 it was also to hide the fact that this existed theres a good video with F-117 pilots from i believe the Airzoo in Michigan that talks about everything and one of the points was that they used parts from other planes so it looked like they were just buying parts not building a plane
@TechTranslate-wb8yq5 ай бұрын
👍Thank you for this detailed view/explanations. I remember when it was first revealed to the public, it looked like s.th. from outer space. A lot was still wrapped in secrecy at this time and it would have been a dream to see it in this detail. What amazed me most, was that at this time it was already more than 10 years in service, because even experts at this time thought, that a stealth aircraft is just in its early prototype phase ...
@paulHx4153 ай бұрын
Who remembers the movie Executive Decision when they docked a F-117 to a 747 ventral hatch while in flight?
@stone18jo2 ай бұрын
When the killed off segaul
@stone18jo2 ай бұрын
I still cut bags in the x pattern they cut open canvas suitcas carries in the fuselage
@haroldishoy211311 күн бұрын
I love this aircraft and worked on them doing NDT in New Mexico.
@tibor12345 ай бұрын
I remember being on a a airshow back in days, it was guarded by 6 soldiers with loaded rifles. Today we can see every knob in the cockpit on youtube. Time is flying :)
@nathanshaw4285 ай бұрын
Guarded by 6 airmen you mean?
@Reggie-b3e5 ай бұрын
The Airmen with loaded weapons were very polite to us tax payers while at Andrews AFB's Joint Forces Day years ago.🫡
@MrLangobard5 ай бұрын
The amount of engineering this thing has is mind blowing. I wonder what videos will come in after another 20years of declassified planes parked in the museums. Nice vid!
@AlanToon-fy4hg5 ай бұрын
A product of some very intelligent and creative people....
@briancrawford695 ай бұрын
A couple of these were here in Fresno a year or so ago for some sort of training. All kinds of people were out at the airport getting pics and video. Was cool to see in the sky over town
@itseitheryesorno5 ай бұрын
This has such a futuristic design for its time, up until today's standards.
@lemmingsfly5 ай бұрын
It's awesome you got access to the one being restored at the Strategic Air Command Museum. I live near by. Also I see that Avro Vulcan hiding on the side!
@frankdatank50025 ай бұрын
People give that Soviet mathematician way too much credit. Even Lockheed themselves said it’s way over blown and they stumbled upon his book after they had already started working on the the F-117.
@greg81065 ай бұрын
It's one of those tidbits the Russian fan boys online have picked up on to distract from the fact that Russia still can't build a proper stealth aircraft. Combine that with the fact that one F117 got shot down by sheer luck and that somehow compensates for the SU57's shortcomings.
@NoManClatuer-pd8ck5 ай бұрын
@@frankdatank5002 Agreed. Many guys who LOVED T-72 and MiG-25 give Ufimtsev most of the credit yet Denys Overholser (Lockheed), Bill Schroeder (using much of James Clerk Maxwell's work), Arnold Sommerfeld and Alan Brown and a dozen other Lockheed engineers did the heavy lifting from theory to applied.
@barronvonmarlon5 ай бұрын
It might be because of Ben Rich's book. I read it a few years ago and I think he suggests it was the russian thing that was the breakthrough
@NoManClatuer-pd8ck5 ай бұрын
@@barronvonmarlon The Russkies are famous for convincing westerners they can make ice cream out of dog 🐶 doo.
@Audulf-of-Frisia5 ай бұрын
An incredible design! I still think it is SO COOL!
@tristanskipworth43775 ай бұрын
They used parts from other aircraft not only to keep costs down but also to maintain secrecy. Pretty cool
@toastrecon5 ай бұрын
Crazy. I remember seeing one of those for the first time at an airshow in Alaska. I was just a kid, but loved jets and aircraft and we got to go see an F117 parked. It was roped off with probably like 50 or so yards of space between the roped perimeter and the jet. Armed guards with M16s. I think a couple K-9 units, and lots of signs and people walking around saying that there were no pictures to be taken. Digital cameras didn't exist back then, much less any kind of smartphone. It's wild that we get to see stuff like this.
@drmarkintexas-4005 ай бұрын
🎖️🏆⭐🙏 Thank you to Lt col Ken Dyson for being a test pilot for the Have Blu for the F-117 to come about.
@Naki5235 ай бұрын
Memories from my old days at Lockheed - ADP: 1980 to 1989. I definitely have a lot of interesting memories from those old days on the N program
@JSwan-bd1tc5 ай бұрын
At 2:27 you reference the pitot tube on the YF-23 and then the our ports as replacing the pitot tube. Aren't those four flush holes the static ports used for measuring barometric pressure? Pitot is ram air for airspeed, static ports for barometric readings.
@PaulStewartAviation5 ай бұрын
My understanding is that those small holes can be used for a lot now. The B-2 has them located in multiple locations and no pitot.
@Keldor3145 ай бұрын
So, historically, the reason they put the pressure sensors for measuring airspeed out on pitot tubes is because they needed a way to place the sensor out away from the wake of the airplane, which would disturb the measurements. However, the way the wake disturbs things is predictable (at least for areas without turbulant flow), and with modern computers, it's possible to take measurements on the skin of the aircraft and infer what speed the aircraft must be traveling at to produce the observed measurements.
@ScottCarlson-cz7wj5 ай бұрын
Neat video on the 'frizbee'. That slab sided stealth technology went on to effect automobile and motorcycle design for decades (that cool stealth look.) Thanks for the nice video.
@KarpKomet4 ай бұрын
The skunk works team absolutely shamelessly raiding parts bins of various contractors. In the cockpit you got stuff from A-10, F-5, F-18, F-15. Yoink Yoink