Easily the most comprehensive video on the intenet. I've been searching for something like this for weeks, imagine my surprise seeing this video was only a day old. Subscribed!
@SIMNET_aero6 ай бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! Stay tuned for part 2 which will offer many practical tips and tricks for airfoil selection. If you have any other topics you would like us to cover, feel free to let us know.
@MTFTVlive6 ай бұрын
@@SIMNET_aero yeah I’d love to see differences between pusher and puller prop configurations aerodynamically, I’m currently trying to build a 3d printed fixed wing drone using the inrunners from an junked $20 quad
@abhijeetrathore70166 ай бұрын
Amazing! Well explained
@davidg39446 ай бұрын
Thanks, this is a well-presented video. Looking forward to whatever else you produce on the subject of low-speed aerodynamics.
@3SPR1TАй бұрын
Awesome video for engineers thanks!!
@FPVREVIEWS6 ай бұрын
The video touched on the subject but didn’t actually talk about it. That’s the forward shift in CP with increase of AOA. Dealing with the effects of camber on the pitch of the aircraft, maintaining stability without losing efficiency is a major design challenge and something for consideration when choosing the overall aircraft configuration. It’s actually possible to achieve aerodynamic instability with dynamic stability at the same time with no moving parts.
@ОлегКо-э9к23 сағат бұрын
ты тоже в этом ничего не понимаешь .
@FPVREVIEWS22 сағат бұрын
@@ОлегКо-э9к Please enlighten us on the subject, Troll.
@ОлегКо-э9к22 сағат бұрын
@@FPVREVIEWS я не ваш папа, чтобы давать вам авиационное образование и покупать заводы боинга в частное владение . Спроектируйте несколько десятков удачных проектов и истина посетит вас .
@bartekprzybylski11696 ай бұрын
Very good video! I like it a lot. Can i make a suggestion to change colour of airfoil and graphs for brighter for better visibility of diffrences :-) Good luck with Your project!
@SIMNET_aero6 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment and suggestion, we'll improve the image contrast for part 2 of the series.
@evrik782 ай бұрын
05:39 You are missing something. When calculating the CL and CD it is not by the chord c, but by a surface of reference. Otherwise, the dimensional analysis and results don't check.
@Boogie3D5 ай бұрын
2:25 You should specify it better. From your description you can have a relatively thin (5-6%) undercambered airfoil and the max difference betwwen upper and lower surface would make it something like 7-8%.
@literalprimateАй бұрын
Great video, unfortunately a very incorrect definition for lift :(
@FB0102Ай бұрын
Can you elaborate?
@ginonguegang92325 ай бұрын
The correct lift equation has the aircraft wing area and not the wing chord