When he asks if she’s ever done anything wrong, you can see she’s starting to break. He almost gets her to let her guard down until he says “we are the same”, then she takes control of the situation again. Such great acting in this scene and it never fails to give me goosebumps.
@notreyf2 жыл бұрын
You're so right, incredible acting.
@aWomanFreed Жыл бұрын
He’s gaslighting her.
@eddyalvarez8351 Жыл бұрын
Outstanding Meryl Streep ❤
@SaintVodou Жыл бұрын
They were on fire here, and the dialogue is fantastic. One of those times when film catches the electricity of live performance. Streep is a legend; RIP, PSH.
@rtbwolf3 ай бұрын
The movie is called "doubt" for a reason.
@KH6DAN3 жыл бұрын
How lucky we are to see two artists like this in our lifetimes. RIP Phillip.
@user-jz4kw7dv9u Жыл бұрын
Is that your baby on your profile pic? It’s such a cute baby!!
@ascent84873 ай бұрын
And Viola Davis too. Three incredibly gifted actors really playing off each other. It’s quite something.
@Kangaroo-Flavored-Shoelaces3 ай бұрын
100 percent agree.
@kevinprastaro97833 ай бұрын
The idea that we’ll never see an old man PSH acting is such a waste of life and talent
@austinhobson54893 ай бұрын
Preach! Seriously this is the best scene.
@Joy-sr8nh10 ай бұрын
Him beginning to write a “letter of removal” would have normally scared the hell out of any fresh nun…notice how she isn’t one bit bothered and continues to interrogate him…beautiful scene
@Bibbo8844hdbks2 ай бұрын
She's convinced and there's nothing he can do or say to change her mind. She sucks. Perfectly willing to break the rules to achieve her aims, and when he calls her on it, it only convinces her more. In my experience people like this are generally the most unscrupulous in their condemnations, because they don't hold themselves accountable for their own moral insufficiency's. Ultimately he wins on both fronts. He is promoted, and she has a moment of doubt at the end which suggests that the circumstances have cracked her moral zealotry. THE PERSON WHO LOSES is the CHILD! No more loving benevolent father figure. The mother n\ew instinctively the whole time and pleaded to the nun to let it be.
@TheeKittyPie2 ай бұрын
@@Bibbo8844hdbksthat’s if you believe the priest is innocent which based on the way he panics when we hears she spoke to a nun and not a pastor (who was have his back) makes me have…doubts
@Joy-sr8nh2 ай бұрын
@@Bibbo8844hdbks You are apart of a small minority who thinks that and I can tell you've NEVER experienced something like that before. I HAVE. I don't need to research the characters of a fucking movie to know that either....You may not know this but sometimes there's only certainty... Were YOU watching???? LOL if he's got authority over her why not just ignore/kill/punish her like other priests have done?? Because he DID IT and didn't know exactly how much proof she had, therefore he's being "smart" about it and going to another church before the parents find out. Again, she's not just any old new school nun....she knows the potential of all kinds of evil...which is why she mentioned having Doubt...not what you're saying. LOL she's doubting her own FAITH because she knows this wont stop with HIM going to another church. You clearly dont' understand how the Catholic church works either....so many nuns have tried to report this before and gave their lives, and places as a respected sister of their convents. All they do is send the pedophile priest to another church with it FULLY in their knowledge....why do you think so many victims are suing so many priests right now? Because their statute of limitations is extended and they still have time to turn the bastards in.... A black child's testimony absolutely wouldn't even be enough in those times to put him away....at that time NOBODY would ever dare getting ousted from the church. Sister also knew this and that's why she chose to advocate for the child...THE WHOLE POINT YOU MISSED. IF she was just desperate to be vile and get people in trouble, they'd never give a nun that type of power over a SCHOOL. The priesthood would override her every turn....that's ALSO why the priest simply gets to go away and not be leaving in handcuffs. I dont care how much good any Catholic church has done for the community....my kids wont be in it....and that's due to the extensive atrocities they've committed against humanity and children especially.
@WizzdummHeadley2 ай бұрын
Of course she has no fear, as very typical of her like!
@Bibbo8844hdbks2 ай бұрын
@@TheeKittyPie At least I know which side you would be on at the Salem witch trials.
@stephaniecarrow48983 ай бұрын
Transferring offenders has been an unfortunate "solution" all too often. It only endangers more children.
@yevgeniyaleshchenko8493 ай бұрын
True but she alone could not have banished him from everywhere. She did what she could at her level.
@stephaniecarrow48983 ай бұрын
@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 If any adult, especially one entrusted with the welfare of children, believes that someone is a danger to children, they have a responsibility to report that to their higher-ups, and to go higher, outside their organization, if necessary. For some time now, teachers have been mandated reporters of abuse. It could be possible for a principal to be sued or even prosecuted for failing to report even a strong suspicion, and to ensure that it's investigated by child protective services. In these cases, it seems the Church has kept these cases within their own cloistered walls.
@thewrongshoes3 ай бұрын
I wonder who first thought that transferring pedo from parish to parish was a good solution to the child molester priests. Probably who ever was first behind that arrangement probably was a pedo too
@vicj92563 ай бұрын
Also, from what I remember, it is never certain in the film that he was guilty.
@LorettaAvallone-tf6ll2 ай бұрын
true
@jt5625 Жыл бұрын
I watch this scene over and over. These actors just shine off each other. I love the juxtaposition of the priest confessing to the nun. I love how she cradles her shawl like protecting a child even though the sister is the perceived threat throughout the entire film. Her reference to compassion and 'the drunkard with his tot of rum', harking back to her marriage, gives a bit of a back story, but not too much. The attention to detail is incredible.
@meganbeckman8827 Жыл бұрын
"where's your compassion?" "nowhere you can get at it" BOOM
@eddyalvarez8351 Жыл бұрын
I always thought the way she cradle her shawl like a baby it was to tell us she aborted a baby-her mortal sin-or gave it always either or.
@johnbellocchio664 ай бұрын
I believe she is Elizabeth Ann Seton, who was married with a past...
@kennethwayne68573 ай бұрын
So wish I could have seen that production of "The Seagull". The two of them as mother and son.
@mariapena19652 ай бұрын
I thought she was holding a cat.
@jeremyredding22514 жыл бұрын
"Nowhere you can get at it." Priceless.
@jmurdock83033 жыл бұрын
My favorite line .. Something I kept with me
@robbrobb8093 Жыл бұрын
Done.
@arynrowland862 Жыл бұрын
The way he looks at her after. She is his monster. She is the predator, and he is prey, in that moment.
@jmurdock83032 ай бұрын
Perfect
@meganbeckman8827 Жыл бұрын
"Where's your compassion?" "Nowhere you can get at it." ********BOOM***********
@greghanna77533 ай бұрын
I laughed out loud at that one. She really got him there.
@Yomama10293 ай бұрын
Yes I remember that line WOW!
@marshalljimduncan3 ай бұрын
@@greghanna7753 how?
@nonyabidness79112 ай бұрын
@@greghanna7753 yes very saintly of her
@josephtalmadge31082 ай бұрын
Never seen this movie did he in fact hurt children
@thatguy20861 Жыл бұрын
I believe, after Sophie's Choice and maybe Cry in the Dark, this is Meryl Streep's finest and fullest performance. She is unbelievable here. Not only embodying the sternest of nuns, she is also showing vulnerability in scenes like this, but also the scant humor in others. This is a tour-de-force without any doubt(!). The whole film is an acting force: Adams, Hoffman, and, especially, Davis...all are great, but Streep, my god, what an actor, a role, and a performance.
@greywaren6213 ай бұрын
I just watched Out of Africa again, and she was ethereal.
@Mntguy-nr9vl3 ай бұрын
I can't believe she didn't win the academy award for this role.
@atticusfinch38452 ай бұрын
Meryl has never phoned in a performance. She gives everything to the role. Her performances have dimension and depth. The best actress of her generation. It's a shame that she hasn't filmed a movie since 2020's Don't Look Up which was released in 2021. She needs to get back to acting in movies.
@macphallic2 ай бұрын
You are 100% right. This scene alone has to be the best performance I have witnessed from her, and she has dozens of great performances!
@jamessicard66822 ай бұрын
Yeah as in like I didn't even know it was her. Granted I was watching it on my phone in a well lit room. Still..
@calbassas872 жыл бұрын
Her acting is heartbreaking. Leads you to wonder what kind of past she herself has. And how he’s using that against her. Just when she’s about to break she gains control again.
@FeministCatwoman Жыл бұрын
Someone pointed out that she's cradling a shawl as if it were a baby at 5:12, and they reminded the audience that she was previously a married woman. Maybe something happened to her child or she lost it, and this could potentially be a way for her to "make up for it" in her mind.
@Bibbo8844hdbks Жыл бұрын
I don't thonk he's using it against her. I think it's an appeal to her humanity.
Yea at her breaking point she didn’t break. Like a piece of iron being tempered, got stronger. Fighting our own humanity is a sure sign of positive evolution .
@DRthistle3 жыл бұрын
Not a breath of over acting makes this so believable. Loved watching their eyes- how they study each others faces.
@francoisbessing3 ай бұрын
Masters of the craft.
@nunyabiznez63812 ай бұрын
These are two consummate actors. Unfortunately not even their great talents could convince me that this could approach anything resembling reality as it has been my personal experience that no member of any religious order would even dream of standing up for the victims.
@DRthistle2 ай бұрын
@@nunyabiznez6381 Good point.
@hmq90522 ай бұрын
You large fanny
@dannyhernandez2203 Жыл бұрын
When Streep asks the priest if he gave Donald Miller the wine, he says no. However, his body language says otherwise. He nods yes
@aWomanFreed Жыл бұрын
The non verbal communication tells us way more than the dialogue….always.
@dannyhernandez22036 ай бұрын
@@albertmarnell9976 oh please, you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
@JFK-ir7yz3 ай бұрын
He didn’t give home the wine. How is every person in this comment section so lost ?
@yevgeniyaleshchenko8493 ай бұрын
@@JFK-ir7yz So everyone here is ''lost'' while you are the only one seeing the ''truth'' that you can't even explain or provide arguments for. People have different interpretations, some even agree with you. It's the place to have a rational discussion instead of making these passive-aggressive comments with the sole purpose of elevating oneself. Get off your high horse.
@JFK-ir7yz3 ай бұрын
I don’t own a horse. I’m not passive aggressive. And I can explain any “argument” or point I make. Talk about hypocrisy. Triggered much? Yes. Most of the people in this comment section missed the mark, by a wide margin. Most don’t even mention Sister James and her view that Father Flynn is completely innocent. Sister Alysius admitted she lied and that her feeling alone is proof enough. That sadly is what most people here agree with, which is why the movie is so excellent. And exposes how everyone (including you it definitely seems) jumps to conclusions based on emotion alone. But the doubt is still there. Which as father Flynn states in his sermon about gossip, once cast, is impossible to retract.
@EmiliusReturns Жыл бұрын
This movie is such a master class in acting. My gut feeling at the end of the movie was he was guilty, you just don’t want to believe it because he was a more likeable character and she wasn’t. But prickly as she was she was trying to protect the children.
@mesalouis8976 Жыл бұрын
True.
@Kupferdrahtful Жыл бұрын
Very true also we have no idea of the extent of his wrong doings
@yevgeniyaleshchenko8493 ай бұрын
Right!
@LTrotsky21stCentury3 ай бұрын
Your gut feeling is exactly what the movie is about: Feelings over facts.
@vicj92563 ай бұрын
@@LTrotsky21stCentury I think it was also about the need for certainty.
@relll394 Жыл бұрын
"I can fight you" "You will lose" Goddamn that line struck me
@srsusansummers30706 ай бұрын
Blessed be the holy name of God
@rudyferrell3 ай бұрын
Abstinence of offense language offends NO ONE.....
@Noconstitutionfordemocrats13 ай бұрын
@@rudyferrellBut weakness offends all.
@jameskeyes91123 ай бұрын
"I know you are invulnerable to true regret......and cut your nails". OUCH!
@billybobtexas2 ай бұрын
And she says it with unbreakable certainty.
@Dr.JHIrons2 ай бұрын
Sin’ead O’ Conner lost her career because she stood up for the children. May she rest in peace and those who tormented her burn in hell…
@AmosArdent-zx6jjАй бұрын
But seems evil always triumph over good. This is the cold fact of life. Everywhere, evil triumphs, from religion to government, every part of society that ought to be good; lurks evil over and over again.
@RobRyan-c3vАй бұрын
@@AmosArdent-zx6jjHow? Powerful people. They should have no power at all.
@neilisagum23 күн бұрын
Wow, that's very Christian of you (not).
@JimmySteller13 күн бұрын
@AmosArdent-zx6jj That's why people invented religion, far as I'm concerned.
@yortsemloh11563 ай бұрын
This is one of the best scenes of two phenomenal actors in all of film history.
@lawrenceragnarok11863 ай бұрын
No lol
@lawrenceragnarok11862 ай бұрын
@Bob-wb1is no, the truth will not be stifled. This movie is trash and the performance by Meryl was really off
@Crandemon2 ай бұрын
It’s a pretty emotional topic and I think we can agree that this woman’s pursuit of what is undeniably right plays into the value of the scene.
@ragingzimАй бұрын
@@lawrenceragnarok1186 Some men take umbrage that other men have their grooming/predatory behaviours exposed.
@lawrenceragnarok1186Ай бұрын
@ragingzim hahaha, no. I don't like anything Hollywood related because it supports predators. Nice try though.
@C0H87 Жыл бұрын
My theory is Sister Aloysius had an abortion earlier in life. When he confronts her about her having committed a mortal sin she begins to break. Abortion was and still is a mortal sin in the eyes of the church. My guess is that her pregnancy came about under darker circumstances. After which she felt so ashamed that she committed herself to god as a nun. Note the way she swaddles her shawl at 5:10. And the sense of protection she has over the kids at the school. Even the way she judges Donald Millers mother for turning away from the potential abuse of her son. She has a connection to these kids because she sees them as the child she lost. Just my theory.
@Abr0225757 ай бұрын
I don't think the Church would take her as a nun for having had an abortion. Maybe. But I doubt it. Or maybe she never told anyone
@ryan31364 ай бұрын
@@Abr022575She would’ve lied about it.
@Abr0225754 ай бұрын
@@ryan3136 probably
@rickandosca82623 ай бұрын
OR---that was not what she was talking about at all.
@Myfreetherapy3 ай бұрын
Never watched the movie but good theory, just based on your explanation! Come through subtext and backstory!
@allys744 Жыл бұрын
The whole story, Flynn wants to act as the superior to Aloysius. He commands authority in little and big ways such as sitting in HER chair in HER office. But now that he is cornered, he wants to pull some crap about them reaching some understanding just because they’re sinners: “we are the same.”
@chewface3 ай бұрын
It genuinely terrifies me how many people feel so CERTAIN the priest was guilty. Even this video title says it. But the movie is intentionally designed to make you NOT know. To have doubts. There is no solid evidence he's guilty of anything. He might just be gay, and was helping the boy work through his own identity issues. We just don't know.
@steveyblue12 ай бұрын
Considering the sheer scale of paedophile priests it's a certainty.
@chewface2 ай бұрын
@@steveyblue1 You can't judge one for the sins of another. You need facts and evidence, pal.
@steveyblue12 ай бұрын
@chewface have you been living under a rock? The entire catholic church GLOBALLY has been complicit in rampant child abuse and moving priests around to avoid the police. They are all nonces.
@rogerwhite952 ай бұрын
Exactly. These accusations would be laughed out of a court of law. There simply is no evidence of any misconduct on his part. Hell, the kid never even *accused* him of it, and liked him and was saddened that he had to leave. The film is brilliant in enabling the audience to form its own conclusions. It separates the logical from the morbidly imaginative.
@pigmamorris55832 ай бұрын
@@steveyblue1that makes literally no logical sense.
@infinite39955 жыл бұрын
Extremely intense scene! Not many movies as intense as 'Doubt'!
@robbiewalters40554 жыл бұрын
Delores Claiborne...when Delores confesses to Vera about her husband abusing their daughter....intense scene!
@leonardhughes45213 жыл бұрын
Just placed an order for the dvd.
@joecool97393 жыл бұрын
This movie was traumatizing to watch The bleakness of reality
@ianandersen2652 жыл бұрын
It's both clever and bold how Sister Aloysius takes control by showing a strong willingness to risk excommunication to pursue her goals.
@Cheskis243 ай бұрын
I wish movies like these were more popular than The Avengers for example. Such amazing acting, superb dialogue, and real-life situations. Art helps humanity see itself.
@Whiteboykun3 ай бұрын
not enough PEW PEW PEW green screen VWOOOM VWOOOOOM VWOOOOOOOSH for most audiences
@ninanina47992 ай бұрын
Absolutely !
@lulws49402 ай бұрын
Well superhero movies are made for adults and children so they inevitably are more popular, a movie about a pedo priest is gonna have a smaller target demographic
@Bonesph11 сағат бұрын
Avengers is really good movies for being from comic books.
@eliasgeraldo6102 Жыл бұрын
I have to say that this film has had a great impact on my life. It's really unbelievable how biased we can get to be in some circumstances.
@moana33 ай бұрын
The acting is stunning and the writing is extraordinary. All great films have great scripts.
@hiigghbishh4216 Жыл бұрын
“And cut yah nails” 😂💅
@TheDreamingJune5 ай бұрын
Love that part. She's so sassy.
@tedstiles68313 жыл бұрын
Guilt always becomes defensive when confronted with the truth. Then it blameshifts. Then it gas lights.
@plasticweapon2 жыл бұрын
yep.
@Avengerie2 жыл бұрын
Witchhunt mindset.
@bo27202 жыл бұрын
Not always though. If someone accuses you of something you havent done how do you NOT become defensive ? I was accused of stealing at work once. Until they looked at the camera footage and it turned out to be someone else. You best believe I was defensive and angry !!
@MVR3262 жыл бұрын
@@bo2720 Thank you.. I love how this movie is written. Her accusations may or may not be true leaving it up to the viewer. Personally, I think her character is despicable , yet at the same time., she may have a point, then later we find out lied about making a phone call to a nun. Excellent writing, and towering performances by all
@matthewgabbard64152 жыл бұрын
@@MVR326You missed the point. He was guilty, and it was her refusal to be silenced by the power structure in the church that made her righteous. Of course he just moved to another school and probably did it again, but not on her watch. No offense but it’s your attitude that lets this stuff perpetuate She had her flaws, we all do, but she had the best interest of those children in mind always
@firelord46622 жыл бұрын
Phillip Seymour Hoffman would've been a perfect penguin for the Batman.
@Casanova-Frankenstein_93 Жыл бұрын
Collin Farrell was pretty great
@leewitten4758 Жыл бұрын
That's not fair, Philip Seymour Hoffman was the male equivalent of, well, Meryl Streep, any given role he's in, he's the best. Any character in the Batman mythos he would've been perfect in. Including, but not limited to Barbara Gordon/Batgirl.
@Rkid19993 ай бұрын
Ffs leave your wee obsession with superhero films out of it for once 🙄
@DGNYY273 ай бұрын
Paul Giamatti
@djslybacon3 ай бұрын
@@Rkid1999Christopher Nolan’s ‘Batman’ series are the only superhero movies I rate as decent .
@juliocesarpereira43253 ай бұрын
The movie is called 'Doubt' for a reason. It's funny to see people take sides when the film does not establish any certainty.
@sifuhotman85953 ай бұрын
Same thing I was thinking lol. We're never given any kind of certainty in the movie and in the end she even says she doesn't know for sure!!
@slapshot00743 ай бұрын
I thought that. They've either not watched the film (which is excellent) or completely missed the point. We never know if he is guilty or not. Hence-doubt.
@GizmoBeach3 ай бұрын
@@slapshot0074 He couldn’t be more guilty. “Whatever I have done, I have confessed it so that makes me interfering with a vulnerable child hunky dory.” No innocent person ever has to raise their voice, nor threaten an accuser as he does. And calling her back when he finally sees she is not threatened is pretty damning evidence. He even uses trite phrases like “beyond your understanding” to try to excuse his behavior.
@cmariah802 ай бұрын
Exactly I was so mad at the end.
@joelwillis20432 ай бұрын
@@GizmoBeach yikes what a moronic take
@PaulJones-i7k2 ай бұрын
Hoffman was such a brilliant actor. His passing is such a great loss to the acting profession. I recall being quite upset upon hearing of his death.
@bobdigital213 жыл бұрын
There are few actors who can hold serve in a scene with Streep when she's this on point. We lost you too soon PSH
@SweetSeraph93 Жыл бұрын
Just thinking the same. They compliment each other so well.
@da961033 жыл бұрын
This is where it is clear that Father Flynn was guilty. 0:34 Flynn: You should have spoken to the pastor. Aloysius: I spoke to a nun. The pastor would have covered up Flynn's activities. The nun wouldn't.
@Donillini2 жыл бұрын
Or that nun also has it in for this priest? The whole point of this movie is that we don’t know who is actually telling the truth.
@MrSinister7182 жыл бұрын
But she didn't speak to anyone and Flynn already knows what gossiping busybodies women/nuns are.
@faithruckdeschel12942 жыл бұрын
@@Donillini I was thinking at first maybe it was just that Sister Aloy didn't like Father Fly, but if he had NOTHING at all(especially anything that could've been revisited or even taken to be predator)buried in his past then he wouldn't have allowed her to basically push him out? I was also thinking that maybe Sister Aloy didn't speak up in the past for a child and that's why she's so protective over Donald Miller?
@CimbomFanFiction Жыл бұрын
i thought it was obvious all his actions were to protect the boy. Thats why they made a big deal showing the feathers AKA rumors flying everywhere and impossible to get them back. She wouldnt stop..and she had no evidence. He knew there was no way this would resolve itself and the boy would have a chance at a normal life. Im surprised to see so many comments totally believing he was a child molester and this scene or that scene proved it bc of a small decision the actor made by nodding yes and saying no, or him getting riled up about her calling another nun. No evidence was shown in the movie .. even remotely.. of his guilt. But we do know nuns like this are the norm not the exception and he knows his methods and new way of approaching religion isnt liked by old school nuns so they probably all have it out for him. In the end im surprised i havent seen more comments simply explain why he left without a fight. It was to protect the kid bc even if he won, like the feathers.. it wouldnt matter. Especially with how kids are. And his father too in his case
@nicholasbogosian5420 Жыл бұрын
Religious groups, just in general, are very particular about following hierarchy in dealing with conflict. They're very opposed to just going public about anything. Like most professional groups, actually.
@RebisRam3 ай бұрын
The point of the movie "Doubt" is that we don't know if he did it. The video title is misleading
@GoD_Quake3 ай бұрын
100%
@TheEtceteraEtcetera3 ай бұрын
No, it's not. Doubt refers to the internalised doubt and conflict inherent in these relationships and interactions, and yes, to some extent, the doubt over whether he did the crime - but the movie's subtext is pretty clear. Moving abusive pedofile priests from parish to parish is something that - by the time of this movie's release - had been proven. The Catholic Church was responsible for covering up thousands and thousands of instances of child abuse. The movie is telling us that he did it.
@hkraytai3 ай бұрын
What? The priest acknowledged his sin and said he confessed and asked for compassion. Are you catholic?
@AdamMoore-fq8qn3 ай бұрын
They're always misleading... all over KZbin. pathetic and desperate for views.
@taxidermycat3 ай бұрын
Boo hoo 😢
@NunyaBizness2.09 ай бұрын
He left because he knew that she’d never stop going after him. That she would ruin his reputation with the her pursuit to be right. His leaving was not an admission of guilt it was for self preservation.
@CreaticityIsLife5 ай бұрын
I disagree. At the beginning of the scene he was preparing to write a letter to have her removed. And even though she reported him, the monsignor didn't believe her. He had far more power than she and people liked him a lot more than they liked her. If he were truly wrongly accused, he would have no trouble taking her down.
@opensourceanglers82913 ай бұрын
@@CreaticityIsLifeshe was going to fanatically persecute him by going all the way to looking for parents of an abused boy. This would have killed his career guilty or innocent. She was willing to sacrifice herself to destroy him on nothing more than a hunch. She lied to his face in telling him she spoke to a nun at his last parish. She would have done anything and would have felt righteous indignation in doing so. His hand was forced. He had to concede defeat because he wasn't willing to fight to a pyrrhic victory at best. If he was truly innocent (and the movie never makes it clear that he isn't), then I feel bad for him as he was just another victim of a dishonest, sanctimonious tyrannical old crone. And even if she's right and he really did something, she's still a sadist and a hypocrite. Awesome movie and first rate acting for sure...
@cmo94003 ай бұрын
@@opensourceanglers8291ew. No. His anger at being ‘discovered’ by her supposed phone call to a nun instead of a priest? Told the story. He’s a molestor. They shuffled these types around and ruined the lives of thousands. Good for her for standing on what was good instead of what was easy. ‘If she was right’. Then he was a violator and desecrator of children. It would have been very easy for him to call his prior parish and the bishop and have her removed if none of it was true. Interestingly- he didn’t . She could go back all three parishes. What story was he afraid she would find. The people that needed protecting here was not the nun or the priest. It was those kids.
@ragingzimАй бұрын
@@opensourceanglers8291 If there were no parents of abused children to find, her goal to seek them wouldn’t be a threat to him. If he knows those parents exist, however…
@opensourceanglers8291Ай бұрын
@ragingzim respectfully, the search for said parents is a threat to his career even if he's innocent. The search itself is an accusation and she was to go all the way with it and it's unlikely that his career would have survived it. He knew this. She was threatening to de facto publicly accuse him and she was willing to train wreck her own career and relationship with the church in her fanatical will to do so. She made that abundantly clear and in no uncertain terms. That very scene is the climax of the story. The genius of this play is that it's all about the lack of certainty about what actually happened. Did he or didn't he? That's never made clear and that's completely intentional. The point of the story is to bring attention to the vagaries of a situation like this. It's a brilliant story that truly lives up to it's name.
@andrewgundy3045 Жыл бұрын
Pretty much as good as acting gets
@orangewarm1 Жыл бұрын
The play is called Doubt. It's never clear if he abused or not.
@meganbeckman8827 Жыл бұрын
The doubt in the title is NOT about her doubting the priest's nature.....it's about her doubting the church and her faith because of the institutionalized homosexuality and pedophilia
@DGNYY273 ай бұрын
This is not the play this is the film.
@Chris_2312 ай бұрын
1:38 good lord that is some insane acting
@vincentrobinson30782 ай бұрын
Powerful acting!!! My two favorite actors ever!! Myrel Streep and Philip Seymour Hoffman!! RIP Mr. Hoffman 🙏🏽
@marichristian2 ай бұрын
The whole point of this play/movie is that there's no definitive proof that the priest was an "abuser". Hence the title "Doubt". You need to rewrite your title line.
@oldheadprisonofficer70242 ай бұрын
Always had the theory that he may have been gay and wasn't a sexual abuser
@marichristian2 ай бұрын
@@oldheadprisonofficer7024 Yes. I agree with you. The nun is constantly looking for clues and never finds them. She has an active imagination.
@ragingzimАй бұрын
@@marichristian The film shows you clues in Flynn scenes that focus on him and not the nun.
@kentbrooks32273 ай бұрын
They both acted the CRAP out of these roles! I remember when "Doubt" was in theaters. It was groundbreaking.
@spking4149 Жыл бұрын
I’m glad to see they put a box above these videos for victims of Catholic sex abuse to contact about lawsuits. If you are watching this and you’ve experienced abuse at their hands….reach out! Don’t let it stay hidden. Force these ghouls into the light!
@marcohernandez9928 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely! Holy Mother Church is in desperate need of a cleansing; it only stands to reason that the Church Militant should be held to the highest moral and ethical standards and that failure should be swiftly punished.
@TheAoalec143 ай бұрын
Yet Rabbis commit more SA despite being smaller in # .. 😂
@cmt69972 ай бұрын
Hopefully they add boxes for other religions that are at least as complicit in this too.
@sammiepittman31302 ай бұрын
ah they don’t do that anymore
@HolisticManifesting2 ай бұрын
Any male led and male dominated religion, so most of them.
@jarkolimbo92683 ай бұрын
oof...the content of this scene is overwhelming. This was a good play and an equally good film. This pivotal scene is very powerful. Thanks for sharing
@lewistaylor1965Ай бұрын
Nothing beats getting two great actors and sticking them in a scene together...dueting and dueling...over and over...'Doubt' is a classic full of that for the acting connissuer...I put this is up there with Olivier/Hoffman, Brando/Pacino...and It's quite a brilliant film to boot
@wordscapes56902 ай бұрын
Gosh, they really got their brains DEEPLY into that script. Pure brilliance
@M05tly26 күн бұрын
The powershift from the beginning of this scene and the end is truely a masterclass of writing and acting. Superb.
@YogsenForfothАй бұрын
I wish, with all of my heart, that Phillip could have been saved. I wish someone had noticed he was struggling and I wish he had been able to get help. He is so sorely missed. 😔
@maxhess31512 ай бұрын
Two of the greatest actors of the time and I had no idea it was them. Absolutely brilliant performance.
@Zlarel10 ай бұрын
I feel like most people assumes he's guilty of being a pedophile, but my first assumption is that he's simply gay, and to people at that time, that goes hand-in-hand with sex with young boys. That's one reason the film's called "Doubt": There are certainly points where he acts guilty, but is it because he's genuinely guilty, or he's "guilty" of an unfairly-synonymous "crime"? Perhaps he's panicking over being potentially exposed because he genuinely wants to help a kid who shares his "condition" but being exposed will force him to leave, isolating the boy in a situation he empathizes with. The Church helps him in the end, but is it because he's guilty, or because their policy of protecting the guilty is protecting an innocent man? Doubt doubt doubt. "Where's your compassion?" "Nowhere you can get at it." This is the exchange an innocent man would have with a zealous inquisitor prepared to burn him at the stake. "I have no sympathy for you." And this is not what a genuine Christian would say.
@TheDreamingJune5 ай бұрын
That's a good reading. I also suspect the priest might be gay and that's why he says "there are things I cannot say". Such a brilliantly written film to have the audience keep guessing about this character and leave you with questions about whether he is a pedophile, or just innocent and happens to be gay.
@Ben-hn4nw2 ай бұрын
Yeah that;s not what a genuine Christian would say - Hollywood screenwriters have no idea what a genuine Christian would say, because they're only interested in casting them all as hypocrites all the time. An industry currently full of pedophiles and literal child groomers pointing their fingers at another institution.
@blockbullyrecords54172 ай бұрын
@@TheDreamingJuneThat dudes a pedophile he admits nuns knew what happened at the last parish. The guys not gay hes a disgusting criminal he gave an underage kid wine 🙄 hes guilty no doubts
@Devon-n1p18 күн бұрын
Why would a genuine Christian have compassion for fucking pedo weird fuck
@thewafflemaniak56983 ай бұрын
Despite what the video title claims, we don't know whether her accusations are true or not, its the whole thesis of the movie. The movie never presents us any evidence for or against her claims and she is shown to lie and manipulate others into believing her accusations with out any evidence. Keep that in mind when watching the video as it's not about confronting a guilty man, but about the lengths she will go to enforce her beliefs whether or not they are unfounded. The priest may or may not have abused a minor, it is entirely up to the viewer to decide if they desire, but it is not the point of the movie.
@ragingzimАй бұрын
@@thewafflemaniak5698 You are focused on a woman/nun ‘enforcing her beliefs’ and how that’s wrong of her, when ALL of them are enforcing unfounded beliefs ie in God. But you are more preoccupied with her beliefs as she seeks to investigate and protect a vulnerable boy. Why is that?
@thomaskilroy45733 ай бұрын
Worst part is…it was privately confirmed that Hoffman’s priest isn’t predatory. He is secretly homosexual, as is the young boy who feels immense shame. His compassion was merely being someone he could talk to in private and confer with.
@BTURNER19613 ай бұрын
I think you hit on it, at least on how Hoffman and the director decided to interpret and play this script to promote real doubt in the audience. We know he claims is innocent, yet is wracked with guilt over something. He appears to feel guilt about a diffeent mortal sin, yet somehow connected to this boy. Shared internalized homophobia and catholic guilt makes sense.
@Rnankn3 ай бұрын
Self-doubt is literally overcome through solidarity and pride. People don’t realize the effect internalized homophobia can provoke in youth. The shame and isolation at that age can result in significant emotional damage an adult.
@_lithp3 ай бұрын
@@Rnankn boys that age become homosexual through parental neglect by the same-sex parent, sexual abuse, and improper exposure to sex. Think I'm lying? Forty to seventy percent of the clergy are gay. Perhaps 20-30% of them began serving the church as boys. In 2020, that number is 70% of all ordained priests. Similar systematic abuse and homosexuality exists in the Buddhist priesthood too. Eighty percent of LGBT people report having adverse emotional and sexual experiences in childhood. So even if your interpretation of the film is correct, it is opposed to reality. It is not true that internalized homophobia leads to emotional damage as an adult. The ****sexual tendency is the adult damage.
@manfmalachi3 ай бұрын
So the priest stood against these accusations to keep the boys secret? And his ?
@stephengrigg59883 ай бұрын
What do you mean "privately confirmed"?
@heathernikki57345 жыл бұрын
2 amazing actors
@finch45lear2 ай бұрын
They are ‘invulnerable to true regret.’ The writing here is marvelous. The last line out of sister’s mouth spot light’s his one private vestige wherein he kept his true nature in defiance of his priestly garb. She sliced right through his psyche with that command.
@morningowl432 ай бұрын
What’s amazing about the play and the film is that a skilled actor in both roles can make you feel doubt in all sense of the word. When I read the play for my major in college I was told that the original production of the play the actors would switch doubts every performance so the audience had truly no idea if he did it or not. One night he could be guilty the other night he could be certain. While in the movie there is a certain sense that he did do it, it’s still never truly said if he did it or not and still to this day people argue about whether or not he’s guilty or innocent. It’s one of the greatest plays ever written and I’m so happy it got adapted to film.
@PeterJ42a3 ай бұрын
In the end, she confesses her deep doubts about her accusations. He appears to be a gay priest who has not acted sexually but understands the gay child and is helping him traverse a troubling time in his life and show him platonic love.
@jujubegold3 ай бұрын
No it wasn’t that she doubted her accusations. It was that she doubted her faith. That’s the beauty of this film. It allows you to think and doesn’t completely show you his guilt.
@rickandosca82623 ай бұрын
Maybe----maybe this----maybe that---it tells more about our wants/hopes/fears/etc. There is no answer in this tale and that is what the writer wrote.
@jujubegold3 ай бұрын
@@rickandosca8262 yes there is. He later stated he was guilty but the film is supposed to be about the doubt of the sisters faith. So many people fall for the obvious, that because the film is called doubt it’s the question of his guilt. It’s all her faith or lack thereof at the end.
@yevgeniyaleshchenko8493 ай бұрын
That's just one way to look at it. It was still heavily implied that he abused the blonde boy. He could have also used the excuse of ''helping out the fellow gay'' to groom and molest Donald.
@rickandosca82623 ай бұрын
@@jujubegold "He later stated he was guilty", he later stated he was guilty of going after the boy? Really? Unless your J.P.S.----it seems to me it`s about doubt in many ways not only the older nun's doubts.
@JoveCanaАй бұрын
6:40 "Cut your nails" Man, if that wasn't the smoothest, gentlest, and yet strongest "GTFOH" ever.....
@swampsprite98 ай бұрын
0:54 Hah I like how they slam the phone at each other.
@AlexanderYamada2 ай бұрын
"Where's your compassion?" "Nowhere you can get at it." 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@pamelamccall56533 ай бұрын
Watching this scene again brings up that Phillip Seymour Hoffman’s death was such a tragic loss.
@lewiscleale52363 күн бұрын
I'm certain everyone watching this knows how lucky we are to be able to watch these two masters of their craft. How fortunate we are to be able to witness such sensitivity and their devastatingly absolute control of their instruments.
@jandnorton3 ай бұрын
So the entire point of the play and movie is that you don't know if the priest did anything wrong. Hence the title "Doubt". it's actually a way better play since the actors can feel the audience and adjust their performances to maintain their Doubt about who is right.
@jaycarrillojc8 ай бұрын
"You can use the phone if you'd like" is one last fu from Streep. Lol.
@kevinprastaro97833 ай бұрын
The only reason he didn’t win the Oscar for this is that he was nominated the same year as Heath Ledger.
@mariafortino34503 ай бұрын
Just a masterpiece of a scene.
@Jffeeney3rd Жыл бұрын
Never been confirmed he was an abuser. That’s the whole point of the movie…the audience doesn’t know for sure, and neither does the nun.
@ChildrensRightsFirst947 Жыл бұрын
Yes, there was a larger point being made about the old conservative way of thinking - certainty about things you don't actually know.
@Jffeeney3rd Жыл бұрын
@@ChildrensRightsFirst947 dunno what your dopey shot was intended to mean there. I was questioning the title of the clip.
@meganbeckman8827 Жыл бұрын
Wrong. She knows, and those in the audience with eyes to see and life experience know as well. Maybe you should pipe down since you obv have neither.
@meganbeckman8827 Жыл бұрын
@@ChildrensRightsFirst947 not really
@Jffeeney3rd Жыл бұрын
@@meganbeckman8827 perhaps I have far more experience than you think, but that’s ok.
@OdinsDadd3 ай бұрын
Two of the all time, great actors, philip was one of the most believable actors of a generation, and his range was incredible.I really miss him
@macholinus3 ай бұрын
The title is wrong...he's not ever proven to be a sexual assault priest....that's why the movie was called "doubt"
@jbukenya802 ай бұрын
Not me over here screaming, "🗣GET HIS ASS, MARYL!"
@santosd60653 ай бұрын
The whole point of the movie is that we don't actually know if he's guilty or not, isn't it?
@ericbasora4697Ай бұрын
Doubt is an amazing film. It looks stunning, the actors are unreal.. God rest the soul of Philip Seymour Hoffman
@KimMcLean-xs7qm3 ай бұрын
To see these two giants rally back and forth is a wonder to see
@mollyerickson48972 ай бұрын
What demons did he use to portray this role with so much pain? What an incredible actor and in this scene you can see his talent is on par with the indomitable Meryl Streep. So sad he could not outrun whatever tortured him in his personal life. He was a brilliant actor.
@yabasta3 ай бұрын
This description is not accurate. The play/movie is called Doubt. The subject is doubt. The guilt or not is not written to be clear either way.
@jmurdock83032 ай бұрын
He was guilty
@christophercampo90993 ай бұрын
What a great scene. Both incredibly talented actors with a solid script. How I miss Phillip Seymour Hoffman.
@sophiaflagg4259 Жыл бұрын
The most savage scene ever
@fob1xxl2 ай бұрын
One of her finest performances ! Again ! She is frighteningly good ! This was one of his finest performances as well. Boy, were we lucky to have them !
@MudballDon3 ай бұрын
The title is wrong. The entire point of the movie(and the play it is based on) is that we don’t know that abuse took place.
@andReChristosHelios4 ай бұрын
She never spoke to a nun, but a hit dog will holla.
@Honey-Sanchez2 ай бұрын
My best friend admitted to a instance that happened to him as a boy in the Catholic church. He's a shadow of what he could have become.
@ADHD_Samurai3 ай бұрын
This is a dumb title because the whole point of the film is doubt. We don't know if he's guilty or not.
@kimberlylane18223 ай бұрын
These are two superb actors and the movie is amazing. RIP PSH.
@Michelle_Schu-blacka2 жыл бұрын
Flynn wasn't a sex abuser, he was gay or at least somewhere in the LGBT spectrum. It was obvious. They made a point of long, clean nails, his desire to modernise his church and his insistence on love being the most important thing, even if the rules sometimes don't allow it. He had been helping Donald Miller deal with his sexuality and the abuse he faced because of it.
@jamesrella7632 жыл бұрын
He was gay for little boys totally inappropriate for him to be talking to a young drunk child alone about LGBT. You’re misinterpreting his nails as a stereotype for gay men. He is a control freak
@jamesrella7632 жыл бұрын
The abuse he faced was at the hands of this charming and manipulative priest and because of his race. The priest capitalized on this and used his isolation for his own sexual gratification. Yes you are right to assume he was gay because he diddled a young boy, but you have been manipulated by a movie character predator as the script was intended to do was cause doubt
@Michelle_Schu-blacka2 жыл бұрын
@@jamesrella763 FYI... I talked about the fingernails thing because it's a stereotype. There's a thing about film where every scene and every shot has a purpose. The fingernails thing is certainly a stereotype but my view is that it was part of the clues to lead you to the conclusion that he's gay. I have no love for religion and if I'm honest, I assume every priest is doing something with kids until I get proof to the contrary and that they only move to a new church when they've been caught. Maybe you're using the same bias I have to draw you to an expected conclusion, rather than the unexpected one.
@nikosgreek3522 жыл бұрын
oh he helped him alright. initiated him you could say. 🤣🤣🤣
@Donillini2 жыл бұрын
@@Michelle_Schu-blacka do you assume every teacher is abusing their students? I think you are onto something that maybe he didn’t abuse the kid, but rather was worried about being outed. This movie is designed to create DOUBT of what’s really happening
@someordinarydude9147Ай бұрын
This title is misleading and oversimplifies the complexity of the movie. Throughout, you see evidence supporting both the priest's innocence and guilt, yet you never find out definitively if he is guilty or not.
@zyxw20242 жыл бұрын
She read him as he is. Her "certainty" is truth, though he negates it all.
@kylerobin67182 ай бұрын
I think the way the play evolves we are supposed to be inclined to side with the Priest, but the point is that's part of how guilty priests got away with it for so long.
@johningram21533 ай бұрын
The whole point of the whole play (and film) is that we don't know the truth. We know the perspective of Sister Aloysius, and we know what Father Flynn says, and can certainly imagine the possibility that he is being unfairly accused. That's what makes this scene so powerful.
@shilohnanny54228 күн бұрын
She should've won the Oscar for this roll.
@BrianKang-bx2zu5 жыл бұрын
Who’s here after watching The Kominskey Method season 2
@jaydahjaye10113 жыл бұрын
Meee!!!!
@NeedofBeingVersed21 күн бұрын
I don't know if this was intentional, but the priest nodding yes while answering, "No," when asked if he gave Donald Miller wine to drink around 3:05 is a nice, insightful touch.
@carlsnyder48332 ай бұрын
Click bait title. The entire point of this movie was that she only had suspicions about his actions and moved on them as if they were confirmed. Once her goals were achieved she lived with such doubts. Outstanding movie. The world we live in rarely gives us the confirmation we seek on our suspicions. We all must learn to live with our doubts and to not convict the world on our suspicions.
@g7924Ай бұрын
Girl he did it
@sereenahenderson173917 күн бұрын
One of my favourite movies, brilliantly acted. I've never been a fan of Meryl, but she is superb in this role. Definitely on my rewatch list...
@DayshiftPat3 ай бұрын
OK Spoilers if you care about this movie I don’t think the person who made this video actually read the book. In the book, he never actually did it. It is just heavily implied, and the whole point of the book is that this lady’s self righteousness got the better of her, and in the end, she experienced, guess what, doubt.
@JFK-ir7yz3 ай бұрын
Thank you!!! The only correct comment in this entire comment section! Everyone here missed the entire point of the movie!!’
@richardevans9003Ай бұрын
It's a play and the playwright has never confirmed either way. What he HAS said, was that he has told the actor playing the Priest in various productions "how" to play the character. And it isn't always the same answer. There is no "truth" beyond our own interpretation and prejudices
@BrovarSpirytus2 ай бұрын
The title is wrong, the whole point of the movie was that even the nun accusing the priest in this scene in the end was not sure if he was guilty or not, and so is the audience, that's why it was called "Doubt".
@goodguynow3 жыл бұрын
4:02 looks like he wants to confess
@cigargangster80813 ай бұрын
Two outstanding actors make this a powerful scene! 🎥🎞️🎬
@j.t.86852 жыл бұрын
I'm not so sure he's guilty.
@nicholasholiday941 Жыл бұрын
I agree. I think he probably is gay-not a pedophile- and could be sympathetic to the boy's predicament (gay with a homophobic father). He may know this through confession which is supported by his statement, "you know there are many things I can't say", a reference to the seal of confession, a concept that the nun would have known. That fact may be the foundation of the doubt she expresses in the end of the film. I think it is unclear as to what his interaction with the boy was. But even the possibility of the priest being a pedophile pushes the viewer to assume he is, since his departure definitively protects the boy, and his staying puts the child at risk if there is doubt.
@margaretr5701 Жыл бұрын
@@nicholasholiday941 An excellent analysis.
@kitkat27023 ай бұрын
@@nicholasholiday941 I would agree with you if it wasn't for two scenes with William London. In one, he's the only one at a table of other boys drinking lemonade, who looks at Father Flynn without a smile or admiration. Then there's the unusual, stern incident Sister A mentions when he grabbed William's wrist, which shows Flynn has another side to him besides the kindness he showed Donald Miller in the hallway. The other scene is Flynn's goodbye sermon where we see Donald's sadness, juxtaposed with William's small smile, which to me confirms Flynn's guilt. Although, to nod to your theory, this movie is good that it could just be the boys' had surface-level, innocent encounters with Father Flynn and your theory is correct. (Also, you make a great point in your last line).
@syedrhaque7652 ай бұрын
This movie is an institute and its not because of the script but for the two stalwarts of acting. PSH & MS are beyond phenomenal.
@jimsty75502 ай бұрын
Great film!! RIP Mr. Hoffman
@cable77632 ай бұрын
Confrontation with a a priest accused of abuse. It's never made 100% clear in the movie or the play. Thus, the title of the movie.
@spencerlincoln23592 ай бұрын
“Sex abusing priest”? Have you not watched the full movie or read the play? It’s called Doubt for a reason. It is never revealed what actually happened. Sexual abuse within the Catholic Church only served as the basis for a story about human psychology as people face moments of accusation or suspicion in their lives, and the psychology of the accusers. Incredible play and movie.
@Muhlbach822 ай бұрын
Look at the final scene between the senior nun and the junior nun. The director is showing you how appearances can be misleading.
@timirish2563 Жыл бұрын
This is ridiculous. At that point in church history, no nun would dare take on a priest, any priest--let alone an acting pastor. Nuns would not dare confront a priest in public or private. Nuns lived in their own subservient universe; priests existed in their own superior cosmos. The branches of religious were not separate but equal. Priests were regarded as having an almost mystical gift. No one but a superior would dare call out a Catholic priest.
@aWomanFreed Жыл бұрын
That’s what makes the dynamic so interesting in this film. She’s no average nun.
@wisdomseeker0142 Жыл бұрын
Hmmm a Protestant nun sure would have . Some nuns are even rumored to be prophetic and speak about the spiritual revelations they’ve seen. It’s rare but it can happen.
@masonmonroe22433 ай бұрын
She is all mighty in this scene but the finale of the movie is her crying saying she has doubt. Moral of the movie is people act one way in front of you and show their true colors when no one is around