Let us know if you want to see more structural analysis videos! Link to an our intro video and another example problem: kzbin.info/www/bejne/h6Sxp6qIhrueeKc
@sushilbhutada16445 жыл бұрын
One location by mistake taken as 3.92 but actually it should be 3.82 and in one location while calculating displacement multiply dimension has taken 3/2 but it should be 2/3.
@VoyagerLOAF5 жыл бұрын
yah. i was thinking the same
@อิสรพงษ์ศรีพุทธา-ว3ธ4 жыл бұрын
Yes
@duncangutse43672 жыл бұрын
I also realized that
@gopikaselvi43375 жыл бұрын
It's a very good video to understand the conjugate beam method of analysis... We need a clarification on resolving the 3span continuous beam with all the ends are simply supported. . Could you suggest us the trick.. !
@orbital164 жыл бұрын
Hi there @10:22 about the term 564/70(2340) = 0.00344 rad. Dis you get that answer exactly it is? I am using Casio 991Es calculator and Im getting 3.4432x10^-3 which i still need to press the back arrow to get the answer youve got..
@AFMathandEngineering4 жыл бұрын
That level of accuracy is really not important, maybe if you had a really strict teacher, especially not in real life structural engineering.
@sonshadowshadow55466 жыл бұрын
If i maynot be wrong for getting deflection at D. ,you can calculate D(y) reaction at fix end and then taking only right side of internal hinge since moment =0 and calculate moment at fixed end will be easier .
@itsme-tg4dr6 жыл бұрын
how you get the 3.92?
@Ahmedsalah-mq9ef5 жыл бұрын
Not 3.92 it is 3.82
@billmorrison59084 жыл бұрын
you are the man! this is a great video. thanks so much
@alpereneylenceoglu74046 жыл бұрын
You are amazing. Thanks, Conjugate beam is easy for me after this video. 👍
@AFMathandEngineering6 жыл бұрын
Alperen Eylenceoglu thanks so much! Were glad we could help you out!
@crunchbox76985 жыл бұрын
Thanks broo.. Now I fully understand 😉
@gabrielefolino40054 жыл бұрын
isn't it 3.92 x (2/3) not (3/2) when finding moment @ C?
@briankoima90322 жыл бұрын
youre right
@vanbeet51056 жыл бұрын
I'm a little confused about the sign convention you've used, is anti clockwise supposed to be positive or negative
@AFMathandEngineering6 жыл бұрын
van béet thanks for the comment! Can you give us an example of where you're confused specifically so we can help you out? Cheers :D
@AFMathandEngineering6 жыл бұрын
Also to further clarify, Almost always the positive sign conventions we use for bending for beams is compression on top, tension on bottom and counterclockwise (+ve) for moments.
@vanbeet51056 жыл бұрын
I'm not from the US, so probably the conventions we use are quite different. In other videos, i also noticed that in the drawing of the bending moment diagram, when the line or curve occurs below the baseline i. e if the beam sags, the moment is labeled as negative. At our university, we are taught that a sagging beam has positive moment, which is also clockwise
@AFMathandEngineering6 жыл бұрын
I see. Everywhere has different convention. Usually in practice I'll draw the bending moment on the tension side of the beam, however in most textbooks it's on the opposite side for positive moment. I'm from canada btw :) thanks for sharing the different convention that you use at your school! What year are you currently in? Cheers!
@vanbeet51056 жыл бұрын
I'm in second year, doing civil engineering Anyway, thanks for the great content, your videos have been very useful
@markusbryant67893 жыл бұрын
Is there a reason why you can’t just split the hinge and find internal shear and moment without finding the reaction at D?
@civilographybsbd18174 жыл бұрын
Thanku that was really helpful.
@apollodamonbuilders5 жыл бұрын
Your sign convection for the moment was: Anticlockwise as positive, but when solving for moment of the conjugate at D, you took Ay as a negative moment yet it is in the anticlockwise direction. Why?
@gigipensiri9793 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I appreciate it
@kennethdevera25616 жыл бұрын
when you solved for the new reaction at A, why did you only consider moment at left of "C" and didn't include the parabolic side?
@AFMathandEngineering6 жыл бұрын
Because of the hinge at c, we can separate the beam into two parts, AC and CD and solve them independently.
@haeseoya31236 жыл бұрын
@@AFMathandEngineering But why did you calculate all when you solved slope D and deflection D?
@AFMathandEngineering6 жыл бұрын
Because we need the reaction at the hinge.
@zjyub4 жыл бұрын
(2417060 Nm^3)/((706N/m^2)(0.00234m^4) does not equal 14mm?? Did you mean 706GPa?
@badabc69694 жыл бұрын
Please make more
@Trump_Gaming Жыл бұрын
Why didn't you take into account the parabolic loading when doing the reaction at A? You only did the 3 triangles.
@harshitsingh69544 жыл бұрын
what if we have to find deflection at b point
@Corvanor6 жыл бұрын
Question says deflection and slope at B but you solved for D?
@AFMathandEngineering6 жыл бұрын
Yea, question at the start should read slope and deflection at D. Thanks
@kkkkkkk-dl3qd2 жыл бұрын
B or D? Im confused
@SURYA44072 жыл бұрын
How to solve a fixed beam by conjugate beam method