People live without "Prompt $p$g" ???? How can you live like that?
@buggyruy13 күн бұрын
what is that?
@aaaalex1994Ай бұрын
If the memory doesn't fail me, MCGA is compatible with 640x480 monochrome and 320x200x256 colors... I think.
@greenaumАй бұрын
Little tip - when you open a jumper, hang it on to just one of the pins. So it's not connected, but handily there if you need it in the future. Possible our guy knows that and just removed them for the sake of the video.
@TeslaTales59Ай бұрын
I do remember setting those jumpers- mostly for IRQs! In those days, used a lot of HP and 3Com NICs.
@markpricefulАй бұрын
edlin skillz paid off!
@JeffRAllenCH15 күн бұрын
ed(1) is the standard text editor.
@mista_jamaicanАй бұрын
These are based on TTL so pre CMOS. I was a chip level board tech during this era. I highly recommend you start using anti-static protection. If not, one day you'll pick up a CMOS board, zap it, and it's bye bye board. Try finding the early chips to fix it. None of the early CMOS chips had schottky diode protection.
@cptcroggeАй бұрын
I still have a 286 laptop which I connected to the internet a long time ago, it was actually very usable for IRC chats. Tricky was the actual connection, I had to use an LPT LAN adapter.
@DieselDragonАй бұрын
This is making me *really* regret throwing my PS/2 and all those 3Com NICs all those years ago! Though even if I still had them, making content on them would be extremely difficult: For childhood reasons I have very little confidence, anxiety levels higher than the CN Tower, and I'm not attractive enough to make content that people would want to watch! 😞 But aye; Even knowing that a web server simply handles requests and spits bytes out in reply, I would never once have believed an 8088 could do the job, even for the really basic web pages of the early 90s! Top marks for this, fella! 🖥️💯👍 Now, for the next challenge: What happens when you point Micronet towards... _Drumroll..._ 🥁 *...Facebook?* 😱🔥😂
@glhughesАй бұрын
Your test with mTCP is using a much smaller document (22x smaller), and that will impact request times given the slowness of the machine. Would be great to see a comparison with the same content being served in both. I'm guessing mTCP still wins out but it might be a closer race.
@TheParallelPortАй бұрын
Great point.. I didn't think it would make much of a difference at the time, but didn't really consider just how slow the machine is. I'll give ez-nos2 another try with the smaller file to see if there's a noticeable difference. Thank you!
@oblitum7 күн бұрын
My year 😍
@memadmax69Ай бұрын
I remember these PS/2 computers. I had one of the monitors and it was just a bit finicky to start: You had to use a hairdryer to warm it up before it would fire up lol
@TheParallelPortАй бұрын
Hahah
@juanstdioАй бұрын
I didn't know the existance of apache benchmark, I'm going to use it to test my web servers!! amazing video
@marsovacАй бұрын
usually in today web apps you dont really need to test the web servers since the bottleneck won't be serving the pages but running the apps that it hosts, so expect the javascript side or the application or database side to be the bottleneck for users.
@TradieTrevАй бұрын
This brings me good memories of working at computer shop in 2000 we'd get these old girls in (sorry if that offends, I just like treating electronics as an object of satisfaction) my boss was tripped out how I managed to boot load win95 off a network server for a fast install. He always did things manually.
@c1ph3rpunkАй бұрын
I still have a storage bin of parts from the 80’s and 90’s, when I’d work on a machine, or retire one, I’d scavenge or keep stuff in it. There must be 5000 jumpers in it.
@alexevansukАй бұрын
Hardware based settings need to make a comeback.
@David_PhantomАй бұрын
Surprised you didn't ftp over a better text editor while you were at it. Really cool job! Would be fun to see what the most complex website you can host on the machine is. I'd imagine it would have to be only html and css based. Basically everything done on the client side. Though I bet you could host some basic imagines. Also, image using it as a smart home controller like thing? Using simple GET and POST requests on a webpage, and then using the serial port to send commands to something? I mean, the only reason that would be cool is because it's an old machine, but that's a good enough reason for me! There is, for some reason, python for DOS which might be something you could use. I'd imagine it would run pretty poorly, but still. Basically, forcing it to do things it was never intended to do is always fun!
@marsovacАй бұрын
python is one of the slowest languages on the planet for the machine code it produces, and it also has a complex and slow interpreter. Don't think it would fit well on an 8086.
@movax20hАй бұрын
Pretty cool. Not too complex. I am bit surprised tho that it only gets 1-2KB/s. This is like 2 packets per second. Even that CPU should do better. I suspect some issues in software not implemented too well.
@DieselDragonАй бұрын
Bear in mind this is a 16-bit system and memory is probably working in 512 byte pages, so it's working to much more constrictive limitations compared to any machine today! I'd say 2-4KB/s on a 8088 machine with 384K RAM, several TSR applications and the NIC stack on top is pretty darn awesome! 💯
@s.kammerer1206Ай бұрын
it would be cool to due this thru there serial port!
@CollinBaillieАй бұрын
No BODY tags? 😮 😁😇
@DieselDragonАй бұрын
So it wasn't just my OCD which got hit by that? 😂
@sydneybiscuitАй бұрын
yeah @22:13 the command you want there is rename instead of "move" you just rename the file to a different directory (:
@TheParallelPortАй бұрын
Hahah thanks.. nothing humbles me faster than an ancient version of DOS
@JeffRAllenCH15 күн бұрын
30:00 Why you no blink?
@prometheus4130Ай бұрын
it all went downhill after the 286 😥
@JeffRAllenCH15 күн бұрын
Turbo button, ftw.
@seantu1496Ай бұрын
All that and you didn't run Lynx? FWIW, you can get even older hardware onto a TCP/IP stack.
@BurkenProductionsАй бұрын
You forgot the html body
@alexevansukАй бұрын
Now try again.. with *nix
@BurkenProductionsАй бұрын
Well change the default its since it contlics with the serial port
@BurkenProductionsАй бұрын
Yeah wattcp is the best, beats mtcp way more
@BurkenProductionsАй бұрын
No its not insane nor is it amazing. Most ppl did this in the 90s as well when running dos by default. Nothing new