BEST EXPLANATION I'VE FOUND SO FAR. THANK YOU DR. GILLANI, YOU'VE SAVED MY THESIS!
@Amharic_English3 жыл бұрын
Patiency pay-off, be calm and follow this amazing teacher
@shafiulalam11753 жыл бұрын
Really a great lesson, just fully covered the whole panel data from introduction to analysis as well as converting into doc
@oa-level-mathematics2 жыл бұрын
An August Master class on STATA , Jazaak Allah Khair , Respected sir
@Maria-tn4cn11 ай бұрын
very helpful session, well explain thank you Dr Syed Ahmed
@mdarozkabir52002 жыл бұрын
Many many thanks to syed ahmad sir....from Bangladesh.
@elbraimoh50342 жыл бұрын
Top notch teaching style. Many thanks for putting this lecture together.
@kastyphelicean2183 жыл бұрын
Excellent and very practical. Will appreciate if you will deliver a presentation on applicable models and diagnostic tests for unbalanced panel.
@rejaulkarim61373 жыл бұрын
Verry effective and easy-to-understand version of the presentation. Thank you so much, sir.
@mulatutilahun64112 жыл бұрын
Wow! Excellently discussed. Thank you, Dr. Syed.
@stevensongiso3280 Жыл бұрын
i love the detailedness in your video. thanks 📌
@Hiwaradan3 ай бұрын
It was indeed insightful. Just I think Dr Syed made a small unintentional mistake. We should have chosen the random effect since the prob value is greater than 0.05.
@datawithstata10 ай бұрын
Great video! Great delivery and insights!
@nkafujulianaatabong2672 Жыл бұрын
Well explained sir. Thank you for the details!
@baatiekuuenochnaanyaan96188 ай бұрын
Very insightful video. Please increase the clarity of the commands in your subsequent videos Thank you.
@sakshikhurana312 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much creating this video.
@yousafkhankhalil87262 жыл бұрын
Best for beginners and fresh learners !!!!
@mariaherrera80252 жыл бұрын
Good Explanation. Thanks so much
@tanushreedash51392 ай бұрын
Thank you so much
@user-nn9hf5iq7f11 ай бұрын
Thank you Dr. I learned a lot!
@aminarana43002 жыл бұрын
Very great...u covered whole panel data
@edmire100 Жыл бұрын
ALLAH Bless you sir; great work, Thank you.
@bhartimanhas60182 жыл бұрын
Excellent session..thanks a lot
@aminarana43002 жыл бұрын
Very informative...thank u sir so much ❤
@asimasaleem27932 жыл бұрын
Excellent Sir, quite helpful
@asmazahoor77743 жыл бұрын
Thanks for providing the opportunity.
@alulaish2 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir, it is helpful, but the interpretation of hausman test has different interpretation , i if P-value of chi2 >0.05 fell to reject Ho wic is random effect is consistent estimator . If
@user-fv9uh2bg7e2 жыл бұрын
Where is the data? Audience needs the data to practice and reproduce the results.
@akashbagga288511 ай бұрын
Great lesson :)
@user-kn7rl4ii7f8 ай бұрын
One correction, please. If the Hausman test result is more than 0.05 then we should go for the random effect model. Fixed effect may be incorrect.
@abcdefghijkl5412 Жыл бұрын
Thank you Dr Syed Ahmad Gillani for this insightful presentation. Could you help us understand the theoretical model equations underlying each panel analysis method? Thank you.
@asimalshaikhmubarek96943 жыл бұрын
I believe that we choose random effect if the hausman probability value is higher than 0.05
@dr.syedahmadgillani75753 жыл бұрын
yes you are right it was mistakenly spoken about fix effect model..
@BK-qz7ux3 жыл бұрын
@@dr.syedahmadgillani7575 For all the models it is .05 p-value which is associated with 95 percent confidence level and not .005 as you mentioned as significance value associated with rejecting the null hypothesis at 95 percent confidence level. Similarly, for a 99 percent confidence level it would be .01. A good presentation, however, with a good ado file of exporting analysis to the word file.
@bhartimanhas60188 ай бұрын
Thanku sir
@drmazharalimughal2 жыл бұрын
Very informative webinar. One question I want to ask here that "How to calculate moderating variable by Stata. Please help me out
@devinderkumar43513 жыл бұрын
simply amazing
@tienngothiquynh94583 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for your instruction.
@economicmypasion84642 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, it helped me a lot
@ajulobamidelebenjamin6788 Жыл бұрын
I mean the command for jarque beta test of normality test in panel ardl
@ajulobamidelebenjamin6788 Жыл бұрын
Thanks very much sir, your lecture was very superb. Pls what is the stata command for marque beta test in stats 14 for panel ardl? Thanks
@sugandhajain10422 жыл бұрын
sir how to correct abnormality and heteroscedasticity in stata?
@gashukelil91932 жыл бұрын
Dr. I appreciate the way you explain the analysis on Stata software but the result of stata was not visible.
@user-it6yt1jm6o Жыл бұрын
good lecture. How can we export the regression table which look like in the journels? not the regression table in this lecture.
@researchershope5492 жыл бұрын
We also need to learn, how can we handle multicollinearity form databases
@nureh20452 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@CONNECTINGASIATV3 жыл бұрын
for attendance bit.ly/AIC2020-Workshop3-Dr-Gillani
@Amharic_English3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, I learned a lot
@zeshanahmed211322 күн бұрын
Sir, do we check normality of model residuals only or do we also need to check if our variables are also normal before we run the model? if variables are not normal, do we need to make them normal before we run the model? please advise.
@upomarahman66542 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot
@aroosaawan91322 жыл бұрын
sir kindly tell me about to anaylse the control variables?
@said_smk6 ай бұрын
I think the number of obs is low. So we can see that liquidity have a non significatif impact of profitability
@GorginMansourian3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this.
@KaziNusrat-kb1pq6 ай бұрын
my N is less than T. Should I test unit root test? As you didn’t test unit root . I am a little bit confused .
@aliminhaz99092 жыл бұрын
From 30th minute to 35th minutes there is nothing changed on the video. Just the instructions are going on!
@Maria-tn4cn8 ай бұрын
very helpful can you please share excel file for demo
@asmazahoor77743 жыл бұрын
he form AIC-2020 PRE-CONFERENCE WORKSHOP 4 is no longer accepting responses. Try contacting the owner of the form if you think this is a mistake.(This is what appears when I click.
@afshanyounas44953 жыл бұрын
kindly add some video on Bootstrapping through STATA?
@faizasiddiqui29113 жыл бұрын
Sir I need to learn SEM analysis on penal data. Need more workshop video.
@Dikotalgatovna3 жыл бұрын
thank you!!!
@temammohamed88162 жыл бұрын
10 Dr
@asmazahoor77743 жыл бұрын
Have been there right from the beginning but attendance sheet is inaccessible even when clicked the link.
@hamidullah392711 күн бұрын
hello can you share data and slides please for practice
@RuhulAmin-th3zj2 жыл бұрын
If the p-value of the normality test( Jarque Bera normality test) is less than 5%(.05), what will be the treatment sir? Thanks in advance. Eagerly waiting for your valuable reply.
@janylynoson90942 жыл бұрын
Hello Sir, what to do when it is heteroscedasticity?
@saneshkp98102 жыл бұрын
48:55 i think the data has heteroscedasticity is it right
@husenibragimov61133 жыл бұрын
Wrong interpretation of Hauman test, hausman test shows that prob is 0.06 and is more than 0.05 , is not significant at the 5% level which indicates that we can not reject H0 , which Random effect is appropriate estimator than Fixed effect.
@viveksarati3 жыл бұрын
is not positive definitive. Which means we cannot use random effect even though it is more than 5%. In this case, fixed effect is appropriate. Another way to test whether random or fixed effect model is through xtoverid (Sargan-Hansen statistic) (if less than 5% fixed effect model is appropriate and vice versa)
@mekonnenmelkie77243 жыл бұрын
@@viveksarati hausman test shows that prob is 0.06, which is s more than 0.05. we can not reject null hypothesis. That means random effect is applied rather
@dr.syedahmadgillani75753 жыл бұрын
you are right random effect is most appropriate I mistakenly named as random actually it was live session no editing option is there anyhow thanks for your interest. regards
@lochanbatala44102 жыл бұрын
would you provide practise data sets?
@emmanuelagyekum18232 жыл бұрын
hi. can i get access to the excel file used in the analysis? thanks.
@urcommunityfeedingaustrali69822 жыл бұрын
Hi all, when I run the Hausman test I get a chi squared value of -12. Can someone please help explain whether this means that we have rejected the null or not thanks, Peter.
@faizaomar74982 жыл бұрын
Hi Peter, I believe the rejection of the null is based on the p-value of the chi square. If the p-value is greater than 0.05, you fail to reject the null, meaning you use a Random Effects model. A p-value less than 0.05 means you reject the null and use Fixed Effects model.
@urcommunityfeedingaustrali69822 жыл бұрын
@@faizaomar7498 Thanks Faiza, but what is the answer if the p value is -9.76 please?
@faizaomar74982 жыл бұрын
@@urcommunityfeedingaustrali6982 Apologies for replying this late. I have not come across such large p-values, since probabilities are ideally meant to be between 0 and 1. Due to this, I am sorry that I cannot explain what it means. It could be some technical problems.
@rejaulkarim61372 жыл бұрын
@@faizaomar7498 is the conclusion made on the Hausman test by Dr. Ahmed contradicts the conventional way of decision? His p-value is greater than 0.05 and he is suggesting to fixed-effect model. Anyone, please make more clear about it. TIA.
@madiharana61143 жыл бұрын
hey can i talk to you personally? I need to do sub sample analysis in stata.. Please Respond . I am from china
@talharehman94583 жыл бұрын
can someone send me the excel file used in that video?
@plyme2 жыл бұрын
21:00
@jattamanoahmhone6259 Жыл бұрын
you can not teach the whole stata in every lesson. focus on either teaching stata interface or teaching panel data models