Constitutional Law: Individual Rights - State Action Requirement

📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
Law school prep: studicata.com/law-school
Bar exam prep: studicata.com/bar-exam
Free courses: studicata.com/free-courses
❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
Community: studicata.com/groups/community
Testimonials: studicata.com/testimonials-an...
Submit a review: shoutout.studicata.com
📱 TECH
iOS app: studicata.com/ios
Android app: studicata.com/android
📣 ABOUT
Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
Email: [e-mail]
Learn more: studicata.com
🎬 VIDEO INFO
Constitutional Law: Individual Rights - State Action Requirement
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946)
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948)
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, 365 U.S. 715 (1961)
Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis, 407 U.S. 163 (1972)
Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U.S. 42 (1992)
Learn more: studicata.com

[@jonathanlindsey7623]

So thank you, sir, for pulling us over 😊

[@yalelaw]

The GOAT my con law test is next Friday

[@studicata]

Thanks for tuning in! Wishing you the best on it. 🙏

[@jonathanlindsey7623]

I know you think so too or I wouldn't have been placed in a position for a state trooper to run my plates and possibly me and find the person in my car holding a pipe. My HUGE issue is when he tried to tell me to grab it for the guy and put it back in my car when they took him to jail when I never allowed it in my car in the first place. I know that's only paraphernalia but when possession is a mandatory 30 days, is he operating with honor? I don't want that around me.

[@skud9999]

Does State Action apply when a private entity acts as a proxy for the government? Completely as a not at all currently relevant example: If the government were to say, have a direct line to a social media or information aggregation company (lets call them BookFace or Twittard or Gaggle for example) in order to tell them to censor private citizens based on any of the reasons the government is prohibited of doing on it's own, could this be considered State Action and as such make the private entity liable in the same way the government is?

[@Boi-st5px]

I have a paid Leap membership and I don't see this video on your website or any of the new Constitutional Law videos. Are they being uploaded?

[@studicata]

Moving forward, new video content will only be added on our new learning platform/app. You can learn more about transitioning your account over here: app.studicata.com/topic/how-do-i-transfer-my-account-from-the-legacy-platform-to-the-current-platform/

[@qamisrael5724]

Is child support a state action ?

[@jonathanlindsey7623]

As I told 911 and the fusion center. Both twice. To be denied by them. Under oath.

[@bandvideos7319]

Save your time. Right when he gets into the quasi state actors to explain the test, the video cuts out.

[@jonathanlindsey7623]

Divers exist

[@desertpunk6705]

No 2nd Amendment? Well I’m disappointed.

[@Loosecontrollingspirits]

Teach them Lord Jesus! They don’t kNOW! tHEy DOnt KNOW!