Constitutional Law - Rule of Law

[@AbdulRahman-mk3wl]

No one is above the law and every one is subject is to the law

[@IAmAhlam]

This really is the law simplified. Reading many pages of a textbook sometimes causes me to lose focus and lose the point because of excessive information. This video really helped in summing everything up. Wish I discovered this channel earlier though...

[@TheLawSimplified]

IAmAhlam Hi. Many thanks for your comment. I'm glad the videos helped you out :)

The Constitutional law, is a state characterized by respect for human rights, even more than it should be added that the main issue is not the State but the law, as the law meets the needs of citizens, and in addition to legal persons, as law can contribute to improve human relations, without the law can not be advanced, individual law is extremely important, some time human beings dream of building a house, a home, a skyscraper, a megaconstruction. Y., this then has nothing to do with the subject about Alice in the movies, but rather of all human beings follow ends and objectives, but one should not forget the human being or individual by itself, because in itself must have objectives if the people continue to become mass soon there will only be distinguished human beings in some societies.

[@myrnayao6963]

Thank you for the presentation, easy to understand even if Im not a law student.

[@Maacn421]

Dear Sir, Thank You Very much for share this.As you know as sri lankan we have very limited source of law. Your presentation is awesome. Thanks Keep it up..

The Constitutional law, is a state characterized by respect for human rights, even more than it should be added that the main issue is not the State but the law, as the law meets the needs of citizens, and in addition to legal persons, as law can contribute to improve human relations, without the law can not be advanced, individual law is extremely important, some time human beings dream of building a house, a home, a skyscraper, a megaconstruction. Y., this then has nothing to do with the subject about Alice in the movies, but rather of all human beings follow ends and objectives, but one should not forget the human being or individual by itself, because in itself must have objectives if the people continue to become mass soon there will only be distinguished human beings in some societies.

[@neesya7839]

Thank you very much very briefly explained. I could understand the topic better than reading text books.

[@MrMohamed1998]

Keep the videos coming. I will help make your videos popular in spain law universities. Just keep on going, because you are truly helping us.

[@TheLawSimplified]

I'm glad these videos are helpful. I'll be expanding this series soon. If you're are interested, I offer online one-on-one and group tutoring sessions as well. Just drop me a message on the official Facebook page to discuss: facebook.com/TheLawSimplified Cheers, Shaveen :)

[@brandy1184]

The Law Simplified

[@brandy1184]

Look forward to one-on-one tutoring

[@youngtonymontana0]

Thank you for your videos they are extremely helpful in my exam preparation.

[@jorenengamali]

I gotta say this really helped me understand more about the Rule of law and has made writing my essay much easier. thank you :) :)

[@TheLawSimplified]

Hi Jorene. I'm glad this was helpful. All the best for your essay submission and any upcoming exams! Cheers, Shaveen :)

[@tehanilovesjesus]

Currently studying in law and I get it but it’s really difficult to put into words from my own understanding. I hope to further build my knowledge and become more confident in my learning

[@TheLawSimplified]

Hi Tehani. Yes. There are times that students are able to understand but aren’t able to articulate it in their own words. Have a look at my Workshop to get a better sense of how to apply the law: go.thelawsimplified.com/PublicWorkshop

[@jacaranda4u]

Thank you Shaveen for making it clear that the legal principle known as the “Rule of Law” (in reality) is nothing more than a paradox. There seems to be a fourth pillar (or limb from one of the existing three pillars) of the “Rule of Law” that is missing in your video - and that missing pillar or limb is that the Law should rely essentially (and always) on the correct and accurate definition of the words that constitute all the individual laws of the language in which the said individual laws are written. Although the “Rule of Law” is meant to be NON contradictory (as you say) a possible repeal of the Human Rights Act by the UK Government would contradict the notion that everyone is EQUAL before the Law and everyone is subject to the Law. A possible repeal of the Human Rights Act by the UK Government, would in fact not only denounce the notion that EVERYONE is EQUAL before the Law to be a fallacy, but also that NO ONE is above the Law and EVERYONE is subject to the Law to be also fallacies. This is because judges and ministers are immune from prosecution. It needs to be remembered that the word ‘independent’ in the context of the separation of powers - which states that the Judiciary is “independent” from the Legislative and Executive - does not mean that the Judiciary can and has the right to act in a manner that is dictatorial in nature (instead of acting in a manner that is independent from the two other branches of Parliament) OR could enjoy immunity from the scrutiny of the Legislative and the Executive. In fact, it is the responsibility, function and duty of Parliament to make sure that the State has an efficient Justice system which operates with 100% integrity and is unconditionally free from any form of corruption whatsoever. Since the rights of the people are better protected under Common Law (as Dicey says) it is not difficult to conclude that the so called “Rule of Law” must be set aside and that Justice - INSTEAD - should be administered in accordance with the interest of Justice in mind - i.e. in accordance with the set of virtues that each and every single person in the entire world is born with. One does not need to be a lawyer or a judge to know the difference between right and wrong. Another evident contradiction which exists in relation to the two limbs of Natural Law : i.e. “Theological Law” and “Secular Law” can be seen in Jomo Kenyatta’s statement made before the independence of Kenya, which very firmly affirms this contradiction : “Before the missionaries came they had the bible and we had the land. When they came the missionaries told us to close our eyes and pray. When we opened our eyes, we had the bible and they had the land”. So, it can be easily concluded that the so called “Rule of Law” is nothing more than some kind of highly contrived legal tool that is used as a dishonest ploy by some unscrupulous people/lawyers to take possession of other (credulous) people’s God given gifts?

[@legalstar3531]

thanku so much it was very hepful. keep making videos on LLB subjects

[@SaraKhan-bm5iv]

Omg you nailed it... I am using your slides to study for my exam... also I am writing my paper on Lon fuller so thank you 😊

[@TheLawSimplified]

+Sara Khan I’m glad these videos have been helpful. All the best with your paper Sara 😊

The Constitutional law, is a state characterized by respect for human rights, even more than it should be added that the main issue is not the State but the law, as the law meets the needs of citizens, and in addition to legal persons, as law can contribute to improve human relations, without the law can not be advanced, individual law is extremely important, some time human beings dream of building a house, a home, a skyscraper, a megaconstruction. Y., this then has nothing to do with the subject about Alice in the movies, but rather of all human beings follow ends and objectives, but one should not forget the human being or individual by itself, because in itself must have objectives if the people continue to become mass soon there will only be distinguished human beings in some societies.

[@Vikermajit]

Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

[@navyakalpe6787]

Thank u so much I was struggling w this topic 🤝❤️

[@sseasyeducation7388]

Learn a lot from this

[@FALAM-ji8uh]

I view polity lectures. its excellent lecture. . examples and explanations are to easily understood..

[@eldrina208]

thank you for this, helped me get a better foresight on this topic

[@t.beckah3798]

easy to catch up and easy to understand . great work. ☺

[@ladyfaith.5932]

Very helpful thank you

[@calmmeoriginalofficialchan9110]

Great video. I've been researching how to challenge a State law under sections 76 & 109 of the Federal Constitution. I've found s 40 of Judiciary Act but can't find any examples of the application to the court. How about making a video on the "procedure" of "how to" challenge State law under Federal Constitution in Australia?

[@Paul-e9x4h]

Secara konseptual implementasi di bidang hukum lebih di dominasi oleh permodelan dalam sistem operasional pelaksanaan program bidang hukum. Dalam hal ini lebih dikenal dengan sistem konstituante .Yang mana cakupan dasar dari bidang ini adalah dalam komunitas interaksi sosial kemasyarakatan sebagai habitat komunal.

[@aalyssee4425]

Thankyou so much 😊😊😊😊😊😊

[@thesetruths1404]

Can anyone answer this for me? I asked on another show and it wasn't answered. Thanks: "Why isn't anyone talking about an organized communication campaign to several specific officials and news media? This is exemplified by the US Constitution as Step #1. I find it odd no one is orchestrating something like paper letters and public decrees to show the genuine will of The People. Thank you." This is clarification that I added after the original question: What I'm saying is, if we're a nation of laws and have protocols to abide in that law, why isn't anyone promoting documentation of our legal management from "We the People" to the elected/appointed officials so same officials must then comply, argue for a compromise, or be openly defiant to the lawful will of the People they represent and serve? If Conservatives would have organized a letter-campaign and petitions instead of that Jan 6 march/protest which was used against us, in the end, we would have Legal Grounds to replace and force the defiant swampers/useless career politicians out of office and replaced with moral/effective servants. It seems everyone is looking right past the trees to the forest and not doing step one of a Constitutional legal battle, that being, service of complaint and decree of desired remedy from the "We the People" party in this complaint. Does this help clarify? Thank you.

[@lawandenglishlearnmorewith3628]

Good work

[@Rana-no5zk]

Rule of Law is the most impractical concept of law

[@uzmakhokhar9565]

Sir please can you give the chart in proper way ?? Or a clear picture??

[@supergirl-ng1vy]

do u have a more complete version on udemy? many chapters r not there..btw the exams is just next week

[@mosesjumba777]

If I may ask, what's the name of the intro and outro music, it's so heavenly?

[@TheLawSimplified]

“Magic Marker” sourced from the KZbin Creator Music Library

[@mosesjumba777]

@@TheLawSimplified 🙏🏾

[@BrotherTarabi]

Much appreciated

[@rachelmuchiri8425]

Wow.. this is wonderful

[@rockjam4534]

Parliament cannot makes laws only Rules and these rules must be lawful in line with Common Law

[@markstrong7954]

ROCK jam You are wrong, statutes outrank the common law

[@rockjam4534]

Mark Strong​​ Common Law is the highest law since man was created (but you won't know that because you're thick) Acts & Statues are secondary and act as RULES, Know the difference between LAWFUL & LEGAL ( I'm a lawyer by trade with 20 yrs experience) 

[@markstrong7954]

The principle of parliamentary sovereignty implies that statutes outrank all other sources of the constitution - if statute conflicts with common law, statute will always prevail.

[@markstrong7954]

Plus no need to call me dumb, why not just have a peaceful debate?

[@rockjam4534]

They imply legal rules, man cannot make LAWS as everybody is equal under Natural Law, natural being LAWFUL without faulter, only God can make laws, Acts and Statues can fall short or be unfair or even worse, profitable.

[@sahilmahetar1520]

Its so good

[@patricialucious5091]

What abt being denied counsel in open court, what can one do abt that when no lawyer will take the case ? Filing for post conviction relief where judges dismiss it repeatedly until u run out of money. How does that happen ? O I know I’m blk.

[@lawstudywitharsalan7087]

great sir

[@tiseannafarquharson4071]

appreciated

The Constitutional law, is a state characterized by respect for human rights, even more than it should be added that the main issue is not the State but the law, as the law meets the needs of citizens, and in addition to legal persons, as law can contribute to improve human relations, without the law can not be advanced, individual law is extremely important, some time human beings dream of building a house, a home, a skyscraper, a megaconstruction. Y., this then has nothing to do with the subject about Alice in the movies, but rather of all human beings follow ends and objectives, but one should not forget the human being or individual by itself, because in itself must have objectives if the people continue to become mass soon there will only be distinguished human beings in some societies.

[@neshaarmo3203]

Hi do u do any for judicial review ?

[@TheLawSimplified]

nesha armo Hi. It's not added to the course yet, but is in the pipeline :)

[@neshaarmo3203]

Ah I see. Would be brilliant if it's up soon (please pretty please) ... Considering public law is around the corner also how do I purchase your guide please? Looking forward to purchasing it for my 2nd year

[@TheLawSimplified]

nesha armo I'm trying my best to upload before the exams :). You can purchase the complete course from here: www.udemy.com/learn-constitutional-law/?couponCode=YT It's 40% OFF as well :)

[@neshaarmo3203]

Thank you!

[@Cantsay576]

Is this for US constitutional law?

[@TheLawSimplified]

It's based on UK common law

[@chandrashekhermishra5847]

Couldn't get the criticism of Dicey's " Rights are best protected in common law " Would be grateful if someone helps

[@TheLawSimplified]

Hi Chandra. Dicey's third limb essentially says that, only caselaw (common law) can provide safeguards for human rights. However, what needs to be understood is that, during Dicey's time, there were no significant pieces of legislation to safeguard rights, hence his exposition. Today however, you have a number of Acts such as HRA 1998, Gender Act, Race Relations Act etc., that actually provide such fundamental rights.

[@chandrashekhermishra5847]

@@TheLawSimplified Got it . Thanks a lot for your help

[@TheLawSimplified]

@@chandrashekhermishra5847 All the best with you studies and exams. Cheers.

[@lawandenglishlearnmorewith3628]

Right

[@RafaelMoraes91]

Principio do Poder da Lei, ou Rule of Law...

[@msrabiahealthcarecenterand2058]

I seen constitutional law - Rule of law.

[@taketen1990]

Prevention of Sexual Assault, Mandatory Classes, for boys 6th thru 12th, grade!!!!!

[@robinsonmeitei3633]

Can I get reference

[@ideabox5029]

Thanks. Calligraphy should make understandable.

[@nitishrana8914]

Law

[@harshareddy6093]

I want clear meaning by lawyer association

[@ShubhamKumar-vl3vl]

Hello sir what is the deference constitution & law

[@مدونةالفكروالحياة]

I can answer you if you don't mind Constitution has the top legal rules while the law has rules which must be agreed with the constitutional rules which is written in constitution

[@muhammadishfaq1857]

awesome sir ..thanks

The Constitutional law, is a state characterized by respect for human rights, even more than it should be added that the main issue is not the State but the law, as the law meets the needs of citizens, and in addition to legal persons, as law can contribute to improve human relations, without the law can not be advanced, individual law is extremely important, some time human beings dream of building a house, a home, a skyscraper, a megaconstruction. Y., this then has nothing to do with the subject about Alice in the movies, but rather of all human beings follow ends and objectives, but one should not forget the human being or individual by itself, because in itself must have objectives if the people continue to become mass soon there will only be distinguished human beings in some societies.

[@Entaliasb]

Is this for the eastern side of the world?

[@TheLawSimplified]

Rule of Law as a concept will apply across jurisdictions

[@danielwaagen9201]

Legal equality. That is hilarious.

[@sanjeewaegodage341]

Woow goood

[@mrspanky369]

we are ruled by force not law FACT... I can tell you were the Rule of law comes from but it doesnt matter we live in a LEGAL WORLD WHERE LAW WAS been HIJACKED.

[@RonDotComnz]

Constitutional law: is the body of law which defines the relationship of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. ... Funny thing is, people are not entities and cannot live within a state. According to the definition constitutional law applies only to government and Govt. entities. Constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the government exercises its authority. So, a constitution is to place restrictions upon Govt and not the people. Makes sense.

[@meenakshidevi2800]

Please Give me rule of law notes

[@TheLawSimplified]

Hi Meenakshi. Enroll in the Online Law School to access comprehensive theory, tutorial and workshop lessons along with supplemental reading material: go.thelawsimplified.com/Partner

[@yuvrajchhatwani]

Langwej hindi

[@madhusharma5280]

Very bad

[@TheLawSimplified]

Hi Madhu. Could you elaborate?