Contract Law: Acceptance of the Offer (Unilateral Offers v. Bilateral Offers) [LEAP Preview]

[@rozchristopherson648]

Excellent explanation.

[@MikeDubya]

Sometimes I wish I could sell YOU a dry erase marker for $5!

[@curiousgeorgia11.11]

Nopeeee

[@hanaa3723]

thanks for this!!

[@chilandumwale9852]

Thank you

[@shaungorham1568]

North Carolina, Great.

[@samwilliams4620]

doesn't Lucy v. Zehmer negate the need for mutual assent?

[@toofacedbaby0577]

Contract law imputes an intent corresponding to an individual’s words or actions. Mutual assent is not always the parties’ actual intent. As long as a reasonable person would believe there to be an offer + the person accepting actually believes it, and the acceptance is valid (by the terms of the offer), then you have a valid offer + acceptance= mutual assent. “Meeting of the minds” or ad idem is stupid to me bc the minds don’t actually have to meet, we just care about whether their manifestations meet.

[@bobbyg2241]

Hopefully you can add me at the end jumping in joy screaming F#@k quasi judges