The Braitenberg Vehicles

[@Chr0nalis]

These types of topics are much more interesting than classical control theory.

[@nrdesign1991]

I found the term Braitenberg through browsing a 23 year old university website on robot navigation, remembered "mousey the junkbot" from my youth, read a little about Braitenberg and then later just searched for Braitenberg vehicles on KZbin. This is downright fascinating.

[@SecretCollage]

Thank you Brain, you have such deep knowledge with complex subjects. Extremely glad to have found you on Utube!!!

[@dilaturkmen2941]

I guess watching this video made me understand the deep learning principle better. “The notion of depth in a neural network is linked to the idea that you can express something complicated by doing many simple things in sequence”. I think this really makes sense with what Braintenberg demonstrates.

[@dkdatiger]

Currently taking a mechatronics class and that op-amp vehicle circuit is exactly something I want to try to build with what I learned! Thanks for the information as always!

[@mhz7799]

Your channel is one of inspirations am doing my thesis in control. awesome work.

[@mousaalsaeed9410]

The best video I've watched on youtube

[@tylersakimoto4725]

Fantastic video, as per usual. It was nice to hear about some robotics stuff that didn't directly pertain to control systems. Thanks for your consistently awesome videos!

[@CSharpa]

This is a great video.I am an mechatronics engineering student and we recently learned about this stuff.This video comes as a recap.Thank you

[@LithiumLogica]

BEAM Robotics. Super simple robots that exhibit emergent behaviors depending on their component properties and how they interact with the environment. Neurons and neural nets. Really neat stuff.

[@hadijf4294]

magnificent, the way how you explained to link emotion to the way of controlling the interaction of the report was amazing

[@oogalook]

My God, sir. This is the most beautiful, the most moving piece of engineering thought I've ever seen. Thank you.

[@emiliotanowe4323]

While studying Digital Signal Processing (digital filters, Fourier and Wavelet transforms, etc) my professor also used to say that "synthesis is easier than analysis"

[@a.j.alriyadh2699]

Brian, thank you for the video and the book recommendation. i loved the concept. two things i wanna suggest for future videos. 1) programming the arduino theoughout simulink is a lot more interactive than coding i think. Mathworks have their own free arduino support package. 2) i am currently working on neural networks and i think it is really interesting to explore such an amazing control systems tool and educate others about it. i always look up for ur videos and i am thinking about starting my own inspired-by-you channel. love and respect. AJ

[@BrianBDouglas]

+abduljaleel alriyadh Thanks for the suggestions and for the kind words. I would encourage you to start your own channel, it's a great way to share your knowledge to anyone who is interested. When you post your first video let me know and I'll get the word out about it. Cheers!

[@a.j.alriyadh2699]

+Brian Douglas thanks for getting back to me. wanted to mention that i teach control systems at Idaho state university and couple of weeks ago i played one of your videos in class and told students that i learned controls from u and that everyone who interested in controls should keep in mind visiting ur channel. just thought i will let u know. best wishes.

[@hollowbats]

Thank you Mr. Douglas. This whole idea of running away from light and imitating a bug on a microcontroller is severely awesome! :-D Vielen Dank!

[@LAUANGIU]

I have read this book 35 years ago. Very very interesting. And your video is also very interesting. Do you have a video with other types of vehicles?

[@satychary]

Fantastic video, idea, and explanations :)

[@SyedRizvii]

Now that's awesome, loved the theory and application.

[@quantumresonance8201]

Brian is gift to the World!

[@johnodonnell2495]

Brilliant Brian! That was a great tutorial and really sparked some thought. Can't wait for next video

[@AgnaldoC]

I always wait for a new video. Let's watch it then

[@eddietowers5595]

Great video I use some of the same concepts, without programmable chips, and is based on Mark Tildens BEAM Bots which uses logic chips, of course, to do the same functions, though I use it as a learning tool for friends and family

[@rfernand2]

Awesome treatment! I am half way thru book and was wondering if anyone had animated or built some of the robots. Beautiful job!

[@jams8728]

your channel is amazing

[@Rnjeazy]

Hey Brian, I'm really interested in learning how robots work in a swarm. Would be really helpful if you could make some videos in the subject of swarm robotics. Thanks! :)

[@mnada72]

Thanks, as usual another great video.

[@Rawrieshizzle]

Your explanation is by far the best, and so cute to follow! Making it fun and easy to listen to. Thank you - very helpful :)

[@davidd.purington7915]

Good video, easy to understand. It makes you think in laymens terms

[@SuperAnotherUser]

Nice. I loved this book, and have thought about doing this for a long time, happy to see it!

[@pixiepurls]

This is pretty wild, thanks for such a lovely simplified explanation to a concept that is new to me!

[@kitsbits5002]

Brilliantly explained and perfectly demonstrated thank you for sharing

[@aistartupfren]

Thank you Master Brian

[@aistartupfren]

this just made my day

[@marcelodtrevisani]

Your lessons are awesome! I suggest you to make a lesson about state space, it's an interesting topic in control engineering! Regarding from Brazil !

[@sleepyhead444]

Hi Brian! This was a wonderful video, thank you so much for creating it! I am curious about the robots you demonstrated at the end. One of the robots seems to exhibit selectivity in its 'love' and keeps docking to a specific robot when faced with the option of two, if I am not wrong. What programming logic did you use to make the robot exhibit that kind of behavior?

[@AV1461]

Nice! 15.02 The Agressive meets the Lover.

[@owenhe5070]

Hi, can you tell me which software you are running to draw all of these? Is it smoothdraw?

[@LIVERPOOLFRANK]

Amazing indeed!

[@davidliddelow5704]

This was a lovely charming video but a thought occurs to me. If we take these simple proportional controllers as exhibiting an emotion or goal, then we also have to accept that other things have the same feelings. But then again, humans and other animals evolved only to survive and reproduce. Sentience must be a byproduct of existence or it would not have evolved at all.

[@trialen]

+David Liddelow Unless sentience enhances the ability to survive in some way.

[@zikomo8913]

Amazing!

[@BenOmarbaOmar]

awesome mate :)

[@saigovindaraonimmalapudi462]

Love it!!

[@1220metalero]

fucking awesome! Brian you are the best channel I have ever followed.

[@MarcoJFJunior]

Excelent! Arduino's awesome... Great video! Ty...

[@manamuncher3994]

this video was AWESOME i actually learned something usefull :)

[@mikeli9941]

Give some lectures about model reduction or robust control, having tough time on those subjects, just cannot understand the boring math forms. Maybe you know how to demonstrate!!!!

[@eggrute]

They look so lovely.

[@enigma4174]

I am here for automation class at D39C

[@enigma4174]

HARAMBE NANEH ROblox rule 34 memerz

[@JuliettaEllingsen]

Щоразу чекаю новий відос про альткоїни, але все ніяк! Сподіваюся, він скоро все ж з'явиться

[@myperspective5091]

I am design a animal behavior robot and I like your recommendation.

[@Lanny2010]

Potential fields....

[@nasim3269]

The great thing is that those robots could be made without a microcontroller! You could just do it with a simple circuit.

[@luchadorito]

I dont even code or anything, why was this in my recommended? My immediate thought to the final video of multiple robots interacting is that given a specific enough trigger like a particular colour of light to react to simple robots could perform compicated tasks and works as a swarm in a domestic enviroment

[@godofbiscuitssf]

Maybe stop calling it "AI" because it's still really just Searle's version of "ML"? You can still grant Cole and everyone else their critiques of Searle, but there's no AI in there doing semantics. There's no "book" big enough or comprehensive enough to statically cover a predestinate set of answers. Plus? You should have spent more time on the Vehicles book. :)

[@eduardomiranda5601]

very boring

[@DeveshT]

WHATS WRONG WITH YOUR HEALTH ? YOU LOOK SO WEAK ! TAKE CARE

[@hadijf4294]

magnificent, the way how you explained to link emotion to the way of controlling the interaction of the report was amazing