Core i3 14100F vs Core i9 14900K - How Big is the Difference?

Core i3 14100F vs Core i9 14900K l 1080p
Buy Core i3 14100F at newegg.com - bit.ly/420c9K8
Buy Core i9 14900K at newegg.com - bit.ly/3rTFhVy
Games :
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 0:00
Starfield - 1:02
Horizon Forbidden West - 2:07
Forza Horizon 5 - 3:09 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 4:18
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 5:29 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 6:43
Hogwarts Legacy - 7:54 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
The Witcher 3 - 8:55 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesWitcher
System:
Windows 11
Core i3-14100F - bit.ly/420c9K8
Core i9-14900K - bit.ly/3rTFhVy
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3XlBGdU
CPU Cooler - MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360 - bit.ly/3mOVgiy
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR HX Series HX1200 1200W - bit.ly/3EZWtNj

[@TestingGames]

Games : Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 0:00 Starfield - 1:02 Horizon Forbidden West - 2:07 Forza Horizon 5 - 3:09 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5 CYBERPUNK 2077 - 4:18 Red Dead Redemption 2 - 5:29 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2 Microsoft Flight Simulator - 6:43 Hogwarts Legacy - 7:54 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy The Witcher 3 - 8:55 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesWitcher System: Windows 11 Core i3-14100F - bit.ly/420c9K8 Core i9-14900K - bit.ly/3rTFhVy ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3XlBGdU CPU Cooler - MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360 - bit.ly/3mOVgiy GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe Power Supply CORSAIR HX Series HX1200 1200W - bit.ly/3EZWtNj

[@crescentmoon256]

12100f vs 13100f vs 14100f when ?

[@user-qu6ql9rs9x]

5600GT +1

[@JayJadhav]

7 7800x3d vs 9 7950x vs 5 7500f

[@zangetsu6638]

yoooo could you please crunch the math and show the overall mean / geomean of the entire test suite of all the games?

[@TestingGames]

it's amazing but in most games at 4k you won't even notice the difference between these processors

[@ltg8382]

That's cause 4k is all about the gpu

[@GodSEndOMG]

Nice video. Would be nice with some ultrawide also. 3440x1440

[@marstedt]

This is a very good point. Thanks.

[@FeherViktor-zl8bm]

Thats why beast pc +1440p gaming is amazing,rtx 4090 with 14900ks oc with 8000mhz ddr5 ram

[@jakesnow96]

I figured there would be at least some bottlenecking. Correct?

[@emmyjaeger22]

It's actually pretty interesting that the i9 14900K has like double the performance in best case scenario, but cost nearly 6-times the price of an I3 14100F.

[@han-sooyoung]

are you ignorant or what? the best case scenario for the i9 is in fps games where you will see like 4x difference

[@sikst6805]

And games don't show cpu power, look on the CPU benchmarks, editing, creating and transfers are the difference, i don't know even 1 game that will use all cores of i9

[@BarkaDog]

⁠@@sikst6805we are talking about games here bud.

[@m8x425]

That's not really a new thing. The old quad-core i7 processors were always close to 3x the price of an i3, but the all i7 processors were a bit more than twice as fast as their Same Generation i3 counterparts in the best case. The middle of the pack HEDT processors like the i7-3930k were 3x faster in theory but nearly 6x the price.

[@emmyjaeger22]

@@han-sooyoung I was talking about the figures shown in the video, no need to be a b about it.

[@shadowlemon69]

"Core i3-14100F smashes the 14900K in terms of price/performance, giving insane single core performance at an insanely low price, therefore, we recommend the i3-14100F over the 14900K" -UserBenchmark

[@tehJimmyy]

userbenchmark suking intel up ? nothing new

[@Sn4p_Fps]

This test is fake

[@ctsperformance1755]

dude if u believe Userbenchmark, ure lost. Lol.

[@shadowlemon69]

@@ctsperformance1755 satire

[@Swoxie1]

Sad to see people still have faith in that userbenchmark bullshit

[@BNR_248]

I havent been keeping up with the current gen CPUs, but would be interesting to see how a OCed 14100f (through base clock OC or whatever they do now with non k CPUs), would do against a 14900k. Especially considering OCing a 14900k has marginal gains at best, where as a 14100f id imagine would gain a bigger percentage increase, just like the sandybridge days.

[@doodlegum552]

can you put competitive games like warzone or cs2? i know people will say its gonna be 200 fps or something. but i just want to know how max fps is generated in these cpus

[@Wojciech_Michniewicz]

Perphaps it is a stupid question but...which program do you use to monitor the parameters of the cpu , gpu and so on?

[@syaoranhuy3822]

Everything is fine until you open the browser or streaming 💀

[@maalikserebryakov]

Good. Multitasking has become an addiction

[@club4ghz]

@@maalikserebryakov Yeah It's insane. I'm watching movies and youtube vids while playing games on multiple monitors.

[@harmez7]

@@maalikserebryakov a requirement, I'd say.

[@darky799]

i5 or ryzen 5 is best choice for average users, specially chips like ryzen 5600 for 130-150$ for budget build or 13600k can be good for many years to come for multi tasking and gaming and rendering

[@erikbritz8095]

Depends on how many windows but yes it gets slow fast alby i think an i3 14100 if used for a year would be fine cause in a year you can move yo the i7 14700k easy peasy.

[@tonymatola4825]

peco pra fazer o mesmo teste mas em 4k desses dois processadores I3 14100F x I9 14900k em 4k com RTX 4090

[@SnubBarracuda]

Wow, amazing how much that CPU can hold the 4090 back when things are just right. Seems like we need a new DirectX or Vulcan to step up with some kind of a breakthrough or something like that. CPUs just can't keep up with GPU growth anymore. Another video I watched showed that even just taming the 14900k's power usage a little can hold back a 4090 a slight bit in the right titles.

[@maalikserebryakov]

They need ro bring out the Cell Broadband engine from fhe PS3 to level the playing field with gpu growth. 😎😎😎😎

[@H3li0_]

Can you make a 13100F vs 14100F?

[@mishashalda4516]

14900k with intel base profile?

[@scottstamm7022]

Was the 14900K using baseline profile or MoBo OC profile?

[@canerkale19775]

Aslında gözden kaçan bi detay var . Eğer paranızı İ3 14100F yatırıp ekran kartınızı (4070 veya 4080) yerine 4090 almak için yatırabilirsiniz . Fakat burada işlemci baskısını minimalize etmek için oyunları 4K oynamanız gerek . Böylece i9 14900k ile arasındaki fark çok fazla düşecek . Aslında eskiden düşük veya orta işlemci yüksek gpu taktiğini çok yapardık ve genelde FPS olarak çok şey kazanırdık . Şimdiler de sadece kasa ve psu için bi servet ödüyoruz (Gösteriş için) . Garip bi dönem .

[@ngalorngidul7962]

Make compare between i3 gen 14 vs i7/9 gen 9-11

[@nossy232323]

Stock Intel power settings? Or stock power settings from the mobo vendor?

[@fabricejaouen378]

Just watch values on screen and you dont need to ask.

[@nossy232323]

@@fabricejaouen378 I'm not an Intel CPU specialist, so I don't know what the power load or CPU frequency should be.

[@mash93]

yep, the only right way to do CPU comparison is in 1080p, 4k results would be almost identical as it becomes more GPU bound thing. (a good example: Ryzen 5 3600 vs i9 12900K)

[@gametime4316]

with 4090 at 4K and especially 4K dlss quality u will find out that u still need a fast CPU to not have a cpu bottleneck in many games... and when the 5090 will be out and will be able to push even higher FPS in 4K then 4090 u will need even stronger CPU. the way it works is simple, lets say u have a game that 4090 can run at 400FPS at 1080P 200FPS at 1440 and 100FPS at 4K if u have a CPU that can run the game at 120FPS u will be limited at 1080/1440 but not at 4K. now let's say that 2 years later u switch to 5090 that can do 200FPS at 4K at that game u will saddently be limited at 4K too. (it's a bit over simplified sins FPS can fluctuate a lot and u will be limited at one moment and not in the other but that is the way it work)

[@fxfighter]

Yeah, this review did it correctly since all these benchmarks are 1080p

[@H3li0_]

really very fascinating but I expected better performance since we are talking about 8/8 which in reality is a 4p and 4e /8. I think this 10+++ nm from Intel is already outdated

[@Sphyxx]

Were these tests 1080p? If yes do another one with 1440p the performance difference will be even smaller.

[@luckysharma3556]

It's a CPU comparison that's why

[@donmarq187]

Make the same test but with RTX 4070 in 2k.

[@Kenkenok]

i saw very strange in 14100f, the max clock only max at 4,493 Mhz, was it supposed to 4,7 Ghz at max? all of the test have simillar result at 4,493Mhz

[@fabricejaouen378]

4.7Ghz one Core. If more than one thread is running then the max willl obviously be lower.

[@gbr2720]

4.7ghz is the max single core clock speed and 4.5ghz is the max for multi core

[@evilleader1991]

is this benchmark with intel baseline profile applied? :)

[@club4ghz]

No the Noob Casual mode was not enabled as the CPU clock didn't drop even once after exceeding 125 watt. You should definitely enable Noob Casual mode yourself if you did not even recognize it in the video.

[@evilleader1991]

@@club4ghz whoa buddy calm down, why so mad? :)

[@club4ghz]

@@evilleader1991 I was watching all those videos yesterday and the amount of people that buys the most expensive hardware and don't even go into bios except for enabling XMP terrifies me.

[@snakeboy8410]

The output is about 30 to 70 fps but for the price of reproduction about 4 or 5 is not bad

[@fatihgunce6688]

Asus rog ally vs Lenovo Legion go games test video please

[@umarsaidahmad5470]

Why RTX 4090 working at 40% utilization on Microsoft Flight Simulator? ANd other games too, not maxed out?

[@Franki3683]

I believe that is game engine optimisation and the fact that the CPU and GPU are waiting on something else.

[@H3li0_]

1080p

[@umarsaidahmad5470]

@@Franki3683 Bro, 14900K & RTX 4090 was getting 120+ fps in this game. Check previous videos of this channel

[@AzZulski]

Because 1080p

[@SnubBarracuda]

He is purposely running at 1080p and using DLSS to put more balance on the cpu side of things to emphasize the difference. When the GPU isn't using like 99.9% that usually means it's waiting for the CPU to send the next set of instructions. Low GPU usage = CPU bottleneck, usually. The more the game depends on the CPU or the worse the optimization is, the worse this problem will be.

[@JBrinx18]

Baseline mode?

[@marsMayflower]

actually pretty impressive that the i3 is almost maxing out but only hitting 46C

[@Sn4p_Fps]

There is something weird here , windows/bios settings , you have unlocked all the cores and set power plan to performance ? In bios Intel turbo cpu enabled ? Or this test is useless

[@spinb]

I think what this shows us is that a "K" and all the HEAT that comes with isn't really worth it. A straight 14700 or 14900, (CPU's with more L2 cache than an i3), will do quite well for gaming.

[@get-in-2-get-out774]

Well... Is the SA voltage unlocked for the 13/14th gen locked SKUs? - Cause its locked for the 12Gen locked SKUs. Intel nerfed them that way. Memory tunning is not very hot; Lets put it like that.

[@MultiDivebomber]

Games are made different, some games are CPU-intensive and you may need faster CPU, just like Horizon Forbidden West

[@AndyPro05]

Good performance only for it price. Over all i3 is slow... i5 12400 is much better choice.

[@GFM1237]

i5 is the sweet spot

[@itwill-change]

guys gpu power wattage is so difference nothing else

[@mindrover777]

Open up a dozen browser windows, use zip to compress files and start copying some files Then u will know the difference

[@ThierryBrez]

1080p OK but in 4k ?

[@randomdude8894]

4 cores in 2024 ? some games u can even lunch a game

[@Theworthsearcher]

For 15% more FPS more than the double of powerusage and for double of perforamnce more, than tripple of powerusage. 😲 Thank you but not. ryzen 7800X3D any time, or at least 7600/7600X.

[@Lorkran]

If the video does not present a test of the game Black Desert Online, then this is an incomplete video.

[@saputrasaputra3347]

i3 14100f = stable 100fps i9 14900k = crashing 200fps which one do you prefer??

[@dox7441]

6c/ 8c is sweet spot.

[@yt-xo4lb]

Maybe better than older i7

[@galactusblitz4713]

Yo opina que el i3 debe tener ya 6 nucleos de minima y 8 de maxima. Si ya el i5 14600k tiene 14 nucleos el i3 al menos merece 6 nucleos ya sean todos los nucleos potentes o 2 nucleos eficientes y 4 potentes. 4 nucleos ya es estar al limite limite en 2024

[@paletteR6]

But we need RTX4090 right?

[@Rebe-Caufman]

no, you may have 4080 or 7900xtx

[@q_o_w9339]

The same card 100% more performance 💀💀 and BTW, who gonna bay 4090 with i3 😅😅😅😅😅

[@donaldnemesis393]

"But, but Quad core bad rn reeeeeeee" -PCMR elitist who can't breath at 119fps 0.1% low

[@funnyman4963]

monster cpu new gen i3 wow

[@samucodesh]

14100F vs 12400F

[@kelvinkms3671]

4K test please !!

[@Sims64340]

Almost no difference

[@TheAtomoh]

He's testing CPUs, not GPUs

[@Alejandro-md1ek]

WoW

[@4pokalun]

Сравни 14900к и 12400ф в разгоне по шине до 5000Ггц.

[@brianghostfury]

More stuttering on the i3 but the difference isn't that big.

[@GODOFWARWARS]

Very i3 14100F Nice xD

[@arakainer]

I would be interested in 1440p and 2160p also

[@mellowmood9]

This is wrong on so many levels. A person who could afford only i3 how could you expect to have rtx 4090? 😂

[@daemonx867]

Nothing better than a i5 14600K OC

[@Shturm_A]

ryzen 7500f

[@BravoSixGoingDark]

@@Shturm_A ryzen 7800X3D, go big or go burst

[@_fiftyseven_]

@@Shturm_A nah

[@SleepBreezes]

i3 14100 and Rtx 4090 wtf xD. Only use it %50

[@Aleksey-vd9oc]

stupid test, who is playing 1080p on the 14900? And the one who plays at 14100 has 60+ fps - good

[@Sevchik32]

r7 7800x3d better 14900k 400$ vs 750$ 89 c max vs 100 c fps in 95% games R7 better 14900k have better fps in Cyberpunk 2077(7%) and STARFIELD(10%) AM5 Socket have UpGrade to Ryzen 8000 series LGA not have upgrade

[@drsnowmon]

what's the point of this video? All the settings were not maxed out

[@wlmarvin]

first✌️😎

[@rom2387]

2k

[@overtaxed3628]

Yeah nice, but i3 14100f doesnt crash in games like i9 14900k😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@sergorlove]

4k

[@muhammadomerjune1994]

I3 is good for 60 fps gaming

[@realonezx4841]

Stutter all over the place for the 14100f.

[@jackarrows1436]

BottleNeck?

[@damienthorn1340]

- e-cores lmao

[@CRF250R1521]

Micro stutter city.

[@user-lc3nw8ux7k]

150$ i3 14100

[@user-vr5ht6ll9q]

the difference is not that big, especially considering the price

[@AdiiS]

LMAO difference is like up to 100% better performance on the i9. "NoT BiG" lmao yeah

[@ericimi]

The difference is huge but it you are targeting 60fps the 14100f is hanging in there .

[@Sims64340]

The difference is 4 cores VS 24 cores

[@drsnowmon]

have you not noticed that the video creator didn't even max out the setting? Do you really want to play your games in low to medium settings?

[@monke2361]

Big diff in cyberpunk. That game can use many cores

[@josepargerich2873]

Podemos dar una información sesgada o completa. La clave de la diferencia REAL de rendimiento entre estos dos procesadores está en la cantidad de hilos de computación que usa cada juego. A mismo número de hilos, la diferencia de rendimiento es proporcional a la diferencia de su frecuencia. Pero a mayor número de hilos, ahí es dónde el i9 saca pecho. No hay más.

[@abhishreeverma7592]

Wasting time

[@GT4tube]

i3 14100 - 8 Cores = 72 fps 7800x3D - 8 Cores = 130 fps i9 14900 - 24 Cores = 137 fps AMD made quick technology strong 8 Cores than Intel is nothing fast improve what shit. lol

[@H3li0_]

it's also 10nm vs 5nm. That's an absurd difference at all.

[@H3li0_]

it's also 10nm vs 5nm. That's an absurd difference at all.

[@aero-gt4lr]

I3 14100 - 4 cores 8 streams

[@yoshi3706]

I3 has only 4 cores

[@yoshi3706]

And games usually use only 6-8 cores, so 16 cores from i9 aren't being used in the game

[@erhanozaydin853]

Customary friendly reminder that on PC gaming, being CPU bottlenecked is not where you want to be. This video just demos where they stand respectively on that front, for which I appreciate the effort.

[@SleepBreezes]

should have been done with a lower Gpu

[@airtioteclint]

These modern "games" look like shit. Are graphics the only thing people care about nowadays?

[@King34u]

Added more core, reduce cpu usage

[@testertester4968]

AMD loses again.

[@ayrtonsenna4297]

Не думал что старфилд так жрёт процессор