Could Russia invade Canada? (If US remains neutral?)

[@marks6663]

Because if there is one thing Russia needs more of, is cold, frozen godforsaken tundra.

[@May-gr8bp]

south canada is somewhat warm.

[@May-gr8bp]

@Karm G I've been to Ontario and In spring and summer it is warm

[@vortex9755]

@@May-gr8bp I live in Ontario it’s not that warm

[@williamhe1967]

BC is either Canadian California in summer or Western Maine in winter

[@Jaws10214]

@@williamhe1967 BC is in the penalty box until further notice!

[@hdufort]

Depends if their tanks can sustain the potholes in Quebec.

[@MichaelDavis-mk4me]

If my Hyundai can sustain it, they probably can... Oh wait, those are Russian tanks, of course they will break down!

[@ImWallace799]

They cannot

[@looinrims]

The best defense...

[@TheRifild]

have u seen Russian roads?

[@hdufort]

@@TheRifild Good point! 🤪

[@209Unit]

Russia: We have winter on our side. Canada: *So do we*

[@stevesteve7386]

This would be the soviet union's war against Finland all over again

[@thelt1506]

@@stevesteve7386 but canada could win two easy ways 1. Throw all our hockey sticks at them. 2. Flood them with maple syrup with a bit of acid in it. 3. There we won

[@stevesteve7386]

@@thelt1506 hmm, you have a good point, but doing that would be to impolite

[@geoffrust6787]

In the summer we have black flies...International treaties restrict their deployment beyond Canada because they are too OP, weapons that cause insanity are banned.

[@theimperiumofman3714]

Egg2 we would just destroy their culture

[@jasonchiu272]

Russia: *Invades Canada* USA: *your gamemode has been updated to spectator*

[@23AlexandreJ]

Canada would never tolerate such unpoliteness.

[@amutah8063]

No they can't. Canada will launch a preemptive apology and then Russia will feel bad about invading.

[@tidefanyankee2428]

Or, Canada would challenge the Russians to a hockey game......winner take all. With no more Soviet Army team, Canada wins.

[@summer20105707]

Canada will unleash the Newfoundlanders on them. Lord Thunderin jazus look out. Talk about weapons of mass destruction. Only kidding. I love Newfoundlanders.

[@tidefanyankee2428]

@@summer20105707 Isn't that against the Geneva Convention????

[@summer20105707]

@@tidefanyankee2428 Russia is invading Canada and the US in this scenario doesn't give a damn. Who's going to stand up to the Russians for violating the convention? Maybe some European countries??

[@tidefanyankee2428]

@@summer20105707 It was a joke in reference to the Newfoundlanders.....SMH

[@Marshal_Dunnik]

Russia doesn't stand a chance against our Armoured Zambonis, Giant Beavers and Weaponized Moose.

[@abessa6993]

Well, if we stayed for those rules, nobody could even try to invade Australia, because they have their Armored Emus.

[@sirBrouwer]

@@abessa6993 nobody could invade Australia for having to stand upside down

[@abessa6993]

@@sirBrouwer That's a very good point.

[@GavinTheGrape]

ABessa3Ds call in the kangaroo battalions!

[@tiktokmemer703]

You forgot about terminator beavers

[@lamorte42]

Not gonna lie an entire land war on top of an ice cap sounds metal as fuck.

[@tacituskilgore2851]

Underrated comment

[@decentish8546]

You could have tanks on the ice fighting against ships sailing through the ice.

[@Mini17]

@@decentish8546 tanks drifting fighting each other sounds epic

[@daniels1270]

Canada and Russia will stick to fighting their wars on the ice (hockey).

[@MrHusker1996]

Crazy what one disputable ref call in world championship hockey final can lead to

[@malcolmlaprairie5115]

As the person who suggested this video, it makes me so happy that Binkov looks at what we want and responds to it. Thank you so much, dude! Keep making the fantastic content

[@tgoodson2]

He doesn't take into account the speed by which Canada could mobilize troops. Most people in rural and Northern Canada are already familiar with weaponry. At the end of the second World War the population of Canada was only about 12 million yet it had the third largest Navy in the world and the fourth largest Air Force.

[@Kevin-np3sx]

And honestly, the real amount of Canada's war effort and donations to Britain are truly immense. The manufacturing was a well oiled organized feat, creating 1million combat vehicles, then there was aircraft production, weapons, ammo and ordinance, food stuffs, raw materials, the construction of the commonwealth airtraining program called the PLAN which Canada payed billions of dollars for, not to mention the 1billion dollar donation and further loans in the billions range in today's money is tens of billions. While supplying over 250k fighting men.

[@HeyImLucious]

"Imagine a *really* angry Russia" Doesn't take too much imagination there

[@konplayz]

Lucious insert after stalingrad

[@Joesolo13]

"So slightly less angry than normal?"

[@HeyImLucious]

@Darlene Sjostrom "murdered" nice bait

[@SparrowNoblePoland]

Actually it takes. Russia acts pretty rationally since the Khrushchev (or whatever you butcher his name), and since the Putin it acts extremely rationally. The is no reason for Russia to invade Canada, and lots to lose in terms of international trade, not to mention that China would probably use the opportunity to attack Russia and take eastern Siberia for it's resources. I think Russia is going to duck down for the next decades and mainly fear of Chinese agression over Siberia.

[@HeyImLucious]

@@SparrowNoblePoland The main point of the comment was just as a joke b/c of Russia's stereotypical *"ANGERY"* nature. Russia obviously isn't angry all the time but they are the only contemporary 1st world power to annex territory through force of arms in quite a few decades. Whether or not Sevastople/Crimea/Ukraine/etc. belongs to Russia or not is a completely separate discussion. Just pointing out that it happened.

[@_Matsimus_]

They’ve gotta go through me first lol!! 🇨🇦😁

[@КотОхотник-я1ю]

roger that o7 ru

[@hennessyblues4576]

Actually, they gotta get through your dog tank first. Then you're next.

[@Primedwhite]

Love your channel masti!

[@TheManinBlack9054]

Hi! Nice seeing you there! It's really unfortunate that relationship between our countries are sour, hope they will improve someday!

[@chrisk7050]

Love your vids brotha!

[@ChaoticCobra]

CANADA VS DENMARK: FIGHT FOR GREENLAND!!! 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦

[@IGMattDaMan]

no for the rock

[@juanguzman9031]

Why not just buy it?

[@Caesar316]

Haha it's like the friendliest border dispute in history. We put up a flag and leave them booze. They put up a flag and leave us booze. Worse ways to settle things lol

[@tirpitz4657]

@@Caesar316 At this point it's just an exchange of alcohol, the flags are just for show

[@marc-andrebenoit5776]

@@Caesar316 we could leave a blunt or two now. See how they respond hahah

[@777Cobretti]

Most Canadians would also impose guerilla warfare in the Northern forests much more foiliage and stealth than Afganistan

[@it3897]

100% agree.

[@lairdriver]

They have fully trained Native people's living there. Eskimos literally have been trained to fuck up Russians goofing off quickly like the Taliban

[@dalesteffens6769]

Let's see in two years if the gun owners even have the guts to defy Trudy's gun ban if we can't even do something simple like that fighting off Russia or a strong enemy forget it.

[@it3897]

@Dale Steffens Canada is a post country now.. it’s a shell of its former self.

[@Abnarly]

Thing is though, the Russians have the same exact sort of environment back at home, they'd be right comfortable in the northern Canadian wilderness seeings it's the exact same climate and terrain as their homeland.

[@dennismaat9512]

Flat earth society: 'wait that's illegal.'

[@fjc331]

Lol

[@canruzgar6749]

@Tattle Boad not a flat earther but they won't argue, they accept u can pass through North pole, they say that u can't past through South pole

[@altaccout]

​@Tattle Boad The flat earthers believe that the north pole is the center and the antarctic is a big circle.

[@vatnikexterminator9074]

Me: When there's a day in Canada, there's a night in Russia. I talked with a Russian on the internet. He confirmed that. Flat earth society: Wait, that's illegal

[@MrBlueSleeves]

Underrated comment, you win.

[@AM0025]

If only Russia hadn't sold Alaska, it would be a different story.

[@lebanemcarl68]

RC Networks hell yeah it would

[@richdobbs6595]

Yes, Alaska would be part of USA via annexation (like Hawaii) instead of purchase. Or it might be part of Canada. There is a reason why Russia sold Alaska to the USA: They didn't think they could hold it against British Imperialism. There is no way the Russia could hold on to Alaska after its loss in the Russo-Japanese war.

[@jeffsanders1609]

Britain probably would have invaded Alaska from Canada then and taken it

[@hieuphungminh6690]

@CR it wasn't dumb back when they sold it.

[@looinrims]

@@james-baa1249 no they sold it for 3mil in contemporary currency, the inflation adjustment was something like 8.2 billion, or something

[@allninelivez7631]

Russian soldier gets shot: Canadian soldier from across the field: Sorry!

[@sachyriel]

​@Yuri Kovalenko you sound upset :)

[@jobvandelaar7977]

@Yuri Kovalenko wtf u talking about😂😂

[@gksmcslayer2829]

Yuri Kovalenko maybe you should think before you type

[@allninelivez7631]

@Yuri Kovalenko I'm surprised he found my comment. This dude said the Russian military is the best in the world and never lost a fight. Lol. Bro, what about the war with tiny tiny Finland? Gtfo

[@allninelivez7631]

@Yuri Kovalenko but the Fins didn't ally with Hitler until the Germans invaded the Soviet Union in 1941. How dumb can you get? Stay in history class you uneducated slave (slav).

[@chrizzlenipsjomomma2568]

We would never let our Canadian brothers be invaded !

[@andrycanz8693]

no cap

[@Bear-kb4kt]

they would just end up being friends and getting drunk

[@probincruxiii1727]

And then they'd settle the war with a hockey game

[@Yezdansher]

I didn't know maple syrup makes you drunk

[@VoidXDsfx]

MaCCaRoNNi vodka does

[@appa609]

@@probincruxiii1727 Obviously the war started over a hockey game.

[@appa609]

@@VoidXDsfx As does Rye

[@chad_b]

The only really fair way to solve this would be a best of seven hockey series between Canada and Russia

[@Hypercannon77]

I follow the NHL and I can tell you this much…we would smoke them!

[@TrickiVicBB71]

As a Canadian, I greatly enjoyed this video. Thank you Binkov

[@agnosticatheist7529]

I didn't, a military invasion from the north? Come on...

[@jimbeam7248]

I think the war would be decided by a hockey game

[@sorcererberoll4641]

Jim Beam then a drinking competition

[@jimbeam7248]

Sorcerer Beroll yes with Canadian beer no vodka

[@somewhere6]

@@jimbeam7248 Don't forget the whiskey!

[@samisha5834]

@@jimbeam7248 I mean Canada fucks us at hockey but we could win a drinking round

[@stn7172]

Well canada would definitely lose -_-

[@kuku9458]

Don't get any funny ideas, Russians! I'm prepping my battle moose immediately!

[@phileas007]

it'll get easily distracted with tactical carrots

[@РоманЗолотилин-с8щ]

Зачем лосям и медведям драться ??? ))))

[@IGMattDaMan]

don't exagerate...they're polar bears, now CHARGE

[@MrBlueSleeves]

@@IGMattDaMan In a charge situation, I would actually prefer moose cavalry. Ever seen one in real life? Those things are actual winter elephants

[@Soulkinthehuman]

I prefer weaponized beavers, but you do you!

[@Amnesia1v9]

I bet they regret selling alaska now

[@Amnesia1v9]

@New_Account Yeah i see your point. You got me there.

[@7thkansascav468]

We may have our neighborly squabbles and poke fun at each other but if anybody messed with Canada there is no way in hell the US would remain neutral!

[@zachboyd4749]

US President: “Hello, is this the President of Switzerland? You were right, this is more fun to watch!”

[@AgentPepsi1]

Considering that the Russian military, when operating outside of Russia, has an exceptionally poor history (primarily due to doctrine and in-grained nationalistic ideology), and that the Canadians are a resourceful people. Furthermore, even while the USA in your scenario would remain "neutral" (although Canada is one of the largest American trading partners and an historically staunch ally), the American people, however, would not remain neutral. There would be an unending flood of weapons and patriots north into Canada, including many anti-tank / anti-aircraft weapons as well. It would quickly turn into a colossal strategic failure for Russia (not to mention a horrendously expensive one).

[@Tatusiek_1]

It would be better if the US just annexed Canada and exile the Canadians further north.

[@Ashbringer36]

You hit the nail on the head when you mention Resourceful As I’ve noticed in literally all of these military analysis videos they don’t take into account the biggest advantage of the side of the defence, and that is the standing Civilian population There are many a hunter in the Norther Territories of Canada many people with more then enough firearm experience to be rallied into function and while not military level definitely very dangerous (especially once you account for knowledge of the terrain) militia’s which would make the losses even greater And then as you said, there is a big fat no on the chances that there wouldn’t be many Americans travelling the border and canadians sure as hell woudlnt’ stop em if they wanted to fall in line with the troops and swing the tide.

[@AgentPepsi1]

@@Ashbringer36 Now, leftist socialists and Marxists, know here as Democrats, would openly support and welcome the Russians as they are so mindbogglingly stupid to believe that today's Russians are actually Soviets trying to conquer the World under the banner of Marxist-Leninism.

[@Ashbringer36]

The amount of confusion and unrest that would create is mind numbing considering was it not a talking point of the democrats at one point that the Russians interfered with the Election that got Donald Trump the White House?

[@shyarusu7755]

Literally does no one in the comments understand the point of the rules? It's for the sake of the discussion. As an American, I don't care how many Americans would go up and volunteer. I don't care how our lack of support would change their defense infrastructure. And I certainly don't care about political implications. I care whether or not Canada- as is- could win by itself. Y'know, the point of the video.

[@kappadarwin9476]

Canadians just know they would lose, its frustrating like it should be.

[@radforduniversity6424]

I think the Canadians being polite is mostly true, but I've met Canadian troops, and these folks are no joke, they can handle themselves

[@philmacgregor1374]

Canadian troops know how to kill their enemies and they don't play by rules just like our hockey!

[@blakenewton2781]

Truth.

[@johnladuke6475]

Yeah the troops are great, the problem is that we don't equip them.

[@nicholasbrassard3512]

@@johnladuke6475 i thought we had a rather decently equipped army 🤔

[@johnladuke6475]

@@nicholasbrassard3512 Are you joking? You must be joking. As I write this, the government is seeking bids to buy new pistols. To replace the ones that we've had since WW2. Which were actually made as lend-lease aid to the Chinese Nationalist faction to fight Japan, but ended up surplus. Not long ago we bought some second-hand F-18's from Australia because our 40-year-old jets are falling apart and we've been arguing about how to even have a fair contest for a replacement for about 15 years. Our navy can't meet our NATO commitments because they literally don't have enough working ships to defend the coastlines. Our (second-hand) submarines keep catching fire - while under water! And we can't seem to figure out who's even going to build replacement ships, or when. We sent peacekeepers to Mali in 2018. The comment from the general who reviewed the troops when they arrived was that we need to purchase new uniforms because the current ones are literally falling apart at the seams and our soldiers are wearing rags. We aren't ordering new ones, though. We're arguing about whether we should get the same fancy digi pattern camo that Russia and the US use instead of sticking to the CADPAT pattern patented by our own government. With all of that, one thing I will say for sure about the Canadian Forces is that they're well trained. Every Canadian soldier I ever talk to about their foreign service has tales of being treated as elite military royalty by our allies. They know our gear is leftover junk, but the soldier carrying it will go through hell and come back to tell you that he planted our flag when he got there.

[@dholley51492]

-"If us remains neutral" -Laughing in Bald Eagle

[@Skorch88]

Canada: U.S. we're be invaded by the Russians! Help please. U.S.: you're on youre own. Canada: what why!? U.S.: remember 1812.

[@hazzmati]

There was no canada back then. In 1812 US fought against the british empire

[@Skorch88]

@@hazzmati Canada was a colony of the British empire. And vast majority of canadians like to claim 1812 as their great accomplishment over U.S.

[@shyarusu7755]

@ Doesn't seem to stop Canadians from being proud. Let them have it.

[@Joesolo13]

Canada "BUT YOU STARTED THAT" USA: "well you shoulda thought of that when you burned the white house" Canada-"?!?!?!?!"

[@CuChulainnwd]

@@hazzmati Independent Canada? No, but the territory was still known as Canada making the citizens and their militia Canadian. Just like the yanks who figured they were not British when they decided to declare themselves independent. Most of the US is still descended from the UK. Most Americans still take pride in their past heritage. So what is your point? Canada kicked the US's ass back in 1812. Smarts doesn't it?

[@cowboylogic7858]

Canada would not need any help because Russian Generals are not idiots. Russia would not invade anywhere you indicated because geography would defeat them at those sites. Canada would not even fight in the arctic archipelago as the weather and horrendous logistics would do the job. The sites you identified are essentially barren frozen rocks. It is extremely expensive to supply small groups of soldiers in the arctic in peace time and there are no local resources. Forget about supporting a large military outpost with supply lines being harassed. Either east or west coast invasions face bottlenecks which prevent Russia from using numerical advantages to win tactical victories. The Canadian population and industrial centres are protected by geography which would ultimately allow Canada to generate localized numerical superiority to Russian forces at any invasion site. Something that would not be lost on Russian Generals.

[@bojangles8062]

Cowboy Logic Yup

[@volupte7605]

Even with all you said(wich i agree 100%) this whole video is based on numbers and statistics, if this really happened recruitment rate would be waaayyyy higher in canada, wich with would most definetly tip the scale

[@pickleboi5548]

Russia: *Invading Canada* America: Eh, not gonna interfer Canada:*Has oil* America: PLAYER 3 HAS JOINED THE GAME

[@Shad0hawK]

Actually the US has more oil.:)

[@Shad0hawK]

@Ty On Tilt no, domestic oil. In fact, the US was a net oil exporter. In 2019 .en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_energy_independence

[@Shad0hawK]

@Ty On Tilt ok so you bitch about US oil tycoons, then brag that Canada has more estimated oils reserves. So which is the good thing or bad thing? So what. Who had more reserves was not the point. LOL. Nice try at deflection but you failed.

[@Shad0hawK]

@Ty On Tilt "toy with your prey" You need to get outside more! ROFL.

[@harrierr628]

90% comments don't understand what the title mean. It say "Canada vs Russian". Not Russia vs Canada & other country.

[@kurukblackflame]

This scenario suggests it would take '6 months to a year' -In which time the Canadians could put together a very strong defence. I don't think the Russians would be able to hold on to any gains they made. Even if the USA stays neutral I'm sure they'd be more than happy to sell Canada all the tanks and aircraft that it might need. The only way I see Canada permanently losing territory would be if the Russians were able to launch a large and rapid attack.

[@stickmanblubbles4489]

*Chuckles in blitzkrieg*

[@barrylinkiewich9688]

@@stickmanblubbles4489 It's 2000 miles from the Beaufort Sea to the nearest majorish city. The entire distance of the blitzkrieg was about 1/4 as far, mostly on well maintained roads lol Most of Canada's north is either impassable mountains, swamp or covered in lakes and rivers. It'd take an invasion force weeks, crawling along at 10 miles per hour to get anywhere that would do them any good. Go ahead Russia, please invade from the north, it'd make for good TV.

[@Kman31ca]

I worked for years up in Northern Canada. With the weather, the terrain, especially the muskeg, (I've seen pics of entire Oil rigs sink in that crap) it would be one hell of a PITA... Equally bad idea trying to come through the western coast with the mountains you'd have to get through.

[@BirdTurdMemes]

This is a hypothetical, 40% of the comment section don’t realize that

[@MrBlueSleeves]

Shhh, let the americans dream about this hypothetical situation being real.

[@ericvantorik884]

Many Americans triggered

[@dimitri7857]

Yeah the salt in comments is funny

[@arashifujimaru8772]

@Mikes Glove its an "if" situation

[@seanet1310]

But it turns out in the real world, Russia can barely support a logistics operation a few km from their railway lines in the early stages of an invasion let alone across half frozen oceans.

[@green5701]

But in the north of Canada the terrain is so bad that roads are very difficult to built, logistics would be a nightmare

[@lego501stTrigger]

Cuts both ways, whoever has a stronger air transport fleet wins, which is Russia, given that they have actual air defense platforms, and heavy weapons to move, not just some soldiers without any AT or AA weapons.

[@CuChulainnwd]

@@lego501stTrigger What does that have to do with anything? Basically controlling the north of Canada means nothing. There is nothing there. Coming south would mean Russian equipment would be lost do to environment and military loss. The Tundra is a fantastic natural defense and barrier. Using your air fleet to move further south risks losing them to surface to air missiles which Canada does have btw. So good luck invading from the north.

[@Volunteer-per-order_OSullivan]

European Union VS Commonwealth of Nations.

[@FriedrichHerschel]

And the UK is on which side?

[@Joesolo13]

@@FriedrichHerschel "UK is modeled as neutral in this scenario until parliament gets it's shit together" I think that would be an more interesting video than the brexit one though. For one thing there'd be mention of a joint Indo-Pakistani fleet, likely along with Aussies and new Zealanders. Since Cyprus is a member, they might be able to argue commonwealth forces could keep the EU back long enough for ships to rebase there. Canada would mostly get to roll it's fleet into the Royal Navy and lend the British some fighter cover.

[@IGMattDaMan]

@@FriedrichHerschel anglos don't fight each other...well u know except that one time...

[@summer20105707]

Commonwealth wins.

[@summer20105707]

@@FriedrichHerschel They're leaving. Don't doubt it.

[@A_Degenerate_with_Glasses]

Cause of war: Canadian hockey team beats Russian hockey team.

[@КотОхотник-я1ю]

Cause of war: anime

[@420JackG]

Canadians are pretty good at Hockey.

[@josee-annejoly6896]

You seem to forget that the land up north is so fragmented that it would be next to impossible to bring in land troops and tanks from the north, unless they are willing to build hundreds upon hundreds of bridges. In most places there isn't even any roads connecting the inhabited spots up there.

[@piranhaplantX]

Add to this that, while we may accept the US is neutral for the sake of the scenario. The US is no Belgium, and would likely keep a healthy bubble where they simply would not allow the Russians to trespass. This would further limit their avenues of approach from both the north and west, as well as force the US to put a stop to the war the moment they got too far south.

[@usaball9190]

Be a weird alternate universe where we won’t intervene.

[@realpolitics527]

Every binkov video is alternate universe

[@LordBitememan]

Yes, it's a hypothetical. In reality if the Russians landed soldiers in Canada the US and Russia would be lobbing nukes at each other before noon.

[@davidhouseman4328]

@@LordBitememan doubt it would go nuclear. US would shred any invasion forces conventional and I doubt Russia would use nukes without the motherland under threat.

[@420JackG]

@@LordBitememan neoliberalism kinda made nukes obsolete. As soon as everyone's economic interests became interconnected the nukes had to go away. That's why these days we only really see "war" in resource rich third world countries or their strategically positioned neighbors.

[@LordBitememan]

Except the nukes didn't go away? Both powers have treaty-declared weapons stockpiles deployed and with the capability of striking one another. Neoliberalism and economic interconnectedness have nothing to do it, conflict between the US and Russia is off the table for the same reason it was during the Cold War: Mutually Assured Destruction. There's a reason we didn't send troops to the Ukraine, and it has nothing to do with preserving Russo-American trade links. It would have resulted in a nuclear conflict. In fact our response to Russian activity in the Ukraine was to cut trade links through sanctions.

[@Hamsteak]

Sounds good, now it would be even better once the military has better weapons after it's done all it procurement which is going to take decades. But if we had a larger military budget it would deff help. I spent 8 years in the Canadian forces, and served in Afghanistan. ATM our military is in the midst of upgrading everything again, and switching tactics in many fields. Yes were small but each infantry soldier is multi-trained, unlike other militaries where each soldier is train for a specific task. Love all your videos.

[@simpleman3458]

Hey nuke I mean NUKE you can't do anything against this if this is real there would be ww3 and Russia army maybe have no experience but the number talk and technology

[@Hamsteak]

@@simpleman3458 and if Russia used Nukes the United States would use their nukes in retaliation. And Russia would be obliterated too

[@summer20105707]

@@simpleman3458 If things get nasty enough chemical and biological weapons are a possibility though. Especially if they were getting desperate yet not desperate enough to use nukes.

[@rosihantu1]

Justin Trudeau can't wait to dress up like a soldier and paint his face black.

[@Calaman228]

lol

[@DJones476]

ROTFLMFAO!!!

[@michaelferrell7924]

fucking lol

[@highog3288]

Lmaooo

[@Jaws10214]

Brown* You racist pile of fuck. He painted his face BROWN in his attempt to dress up for an Indian dress up party.

[@scotth6814]

3:04 don't forget the Edmonton Navy. There is a submarine in the mall there. Seriously, the US would never allow destruction of NORAD and Russian bases on Canadian soil, because it would endanger the US.

[@70rrsteve51]

But the mall subs have screen doors.

[@1984Phalanx]

I'm surprised by many of the comments. The scenario is just hypothetical and for entertainment only. He's always used the same rules in his other videos. But thank you to everyone saying they'd volunteer lol.

[@hugoyu2001]

Russia: Sends all soldiers to Canada The entire EU: Now it’s our chance! To Moscow, go go go! Russia: Sh*t

[@lairdriver]

Lol!!

[@dalliskal4827]

Good one

[@ItsMe-cf9hj]

))))))))

[@curtisstarozik2992]

I speak for all Canadian's, we have our land for a reason. nobody is ever going to take it from us.

[@juniorfelix3407]

Displacing indigenous people smh

[@vothbetilia4862]

@@juniorfelix3407 Indigenous were fighting other indigenous for territories, think before you speak.

[@martinlutherkingjr2]

Reading the comments from Canadians and Americans. They don't like each other and talk a lot of smack to each other, but would gladly die for one another to keep America and Canada safe. What a crazy world we live in.

[@milkers8653]

Matthew Ross think of it as siblings haha we like tease each other a lot but we’ll also defend each other

[@martinlutherkingjr2]

@@milkers8653 I 100% agree.

[@ledumot4385]

Canada and the USA are like France and the UK, they love hating each other !

[@humansvd3269]

I only would because I'm a us mil member. Otherwise? No, they banned guns.

[@IuIianos]

@@humansvd3269 :/ We didn't ban guns. It's just harder to get them and you need to have a license.

[@magnang]

This scenario fails to take into account the strategic maple syrup reserves.

[@jimmyjones4985]

With the cost of maple syrup, it might be why they invade . At 18 times the cost of crude oil , I might attack Canada .

[@badpiggies988]

Forget Finnish, the snow would speak English and French- especially since they’re already trying to invade Ukraine and it’s scuffed af. Imagine them against an enemy with more modern and sophisticated equipment than Ukraine, as well as a somewhat larger standing military. It also doesn’t help that every single major city and industrial center is all the way south, near the US border. “Канада, Канада, That’s where the Ivans are heading today. Нет, Лавров! Нет, Лавров! You’ve told more lies than Putin himself!” In all seriousness I hope this guy is doing well and has gotten the heck out of Russia

[@aimilize3518]

Njet Molotoff 2022 version

[@stephenwells6434]

Binkov isn't from Russia. I might be misremembering, but I think he's Slovenian.

[@vladyslavpidlisnyi]

@@stephenwells6434 he's Croatian

[@stephenwells6434]

@@vladyslavpidlisnyi Thank you. I knew Slovenian didn't sound right.

[@deathlycost1]

I know the us is out in this scenario, but if Russia attacked Canada, I’m sure the United States would help out. Much love from your brothers down south 🇨🇦🇺🇸

[@lofficer11]

ya think

[@humansvd3269]

UK would say,"This won't do at all! And send a Navy upwards.

[@ankat6756]

Well, putting it in reality, why would Russia need to invade Canada anyway

[@CodeUK93]

The US remains neutral but Britain and I’m pretty sure Australia and New Zealand wouldn’t remain neutral! 🇨🇦 🇬🇧 🇦🇺 🇳🇿 🤝

[@vdotme]

It's a hypothetical. If you're going to get serious about it, the us wouldn't remain neutral and would do more than UK ANZAC put together.

[@newman793]

Cody Dewey They better were the ones that have the USA's back when it comes to war

[@Boss-dr2zk]

U forgot the rest of Nato

[@krazicanuck9045]

CANZUK baby!!!!!

[@ignisilluminati]

Yes, seriously, America will intervene even if Canadians refuse such offer. If you recall how America had responded to the missiles in Cuba, it seems pretty clear that America won't endure any potential threats from its long northern border.

[@darkraven8103]

Of course one thing to note is that IF Canada knew the USA wouldn't defend it, then most likely Canada would spend a lot more on defense.

[@jimmccoal2693]

Naa , let the Russians have Canada .as far as I know Russia is not communist like Trudo.

[@steveandrews7434]

Your comment didn't age well. Fucking Russia can't even successfully invade a neighbouring State. Yet, you think they could invade Canada, LOL's.

[@SirDinzhi]

since philippines threaten war to canada how about you do philippines vs canada scenario?

[@irvenman]

The nonexistent Philippine navy could never launch an invasion. Canada laughs back at home.

[@DeusSalis]

What are they gonna do? Swim to Canada? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@chandlerwhite8302]

The Russian aircraft carrier can’t even sit at the dock and keep from catching on fire!. In case of war, no need to waste any ordinance on that thing. Just let it deploy and sink itself.

[@johnladuke6475]

To be fair, Canada keeps our entire navy in roughly the same condition, so it's kind of a wash.

[@anewstarttoabrokenlife8662]

@@johnladuke6475 what navy ? It's a coastguard

[@xWatexx]

There’s something else though, apparently Canadian military history shows that Canadians fight extremely fiercely and have a rather high morale, although that’s probably not a factor here. Canadian troops are also some of the most well-trained in the world.

[@Ashbringer36]

Yup, it’s also worth noting that though our active military isn’t that big there is a long history of Canadians being mobilized very quickly and since the russians aren’t even doing too much or any damage to the prairies (the middle three provinces) that’s a whole lot of people free to be trained. And canadian economy is strong neough armerments like rifles will not be in short supply not when we can buy from private industry in the States

[@TheSHAAKE]

@Kirk Wolfe Dont forget about Leo Major, The French Canadian who liberated an entire Dutch city (pop 50,000) by himself in WW2. Then in the Korean war took back a key position that Americans lost with a small group of 18 Canadians, then held off against 14,000 Chinese. Hes like a real life version of the Character you play in Call of Duty.

[@TheSHAAKE]

Also he wears an eye patch cuz a Nazi blew off his eye

[@stevestruthers6180]

The logistics involved would be massive and difficult to manage. And much like many parts of Russia, Canada has a lot of difficult, inhospitable terrain. Sure, Russia could invade, but they couldn't land enough troops to pose any real threat, nor could they sustain the troops they did land for very long. It's also highly unlikely the US would remain neutral, as they tend to see Canada as their back yard and any threat to Canada would be perceived to be a threat to the US.

[@thorondor4012]

@Bella is My name *They're

[@thorondor4012]

Canada is impregnable, thanks to the USA... LIke you said, by itself, it's a nightmare to conquer. But with aid from the south, it's a frozen fortress. Rest easy 👍

[@pk-zi7lm]

the canadians would just apologize for getting in the way

[@masaharumorimoto4761]

Obligatory I'm sorry...

[@pk-zi7lm]

"Who are we!" "Canada!" "What are we!" "Sorry!"

[@justmoney139]

I think what this video misses is that Canada has an extreamly educated population, a rock solid banking system and manufacturing capabilities. Meaning that within six months Canada could train, arm and supply an army of 500,000. The army commanders and generals are also very capable and can efficiently manage their troops. This "war" would most likely be a slow drawn out war of attrition with little actual fighting due to the extream distances. The verdict being a draw.

[@CarloFuller]

Im glad your patriotic for your country but lets be honest, Russia would eventually crush you.

[@kanuckistanprepper5321]

@@CarloFuller Uh??? How would Russia...a Country with less financial resources than Canada, limited ability to get it's troops to Canadian shores, fight a nation with defenders advantage, that within months could do exactly what Jake said they could do, In WW2 Canada had an armed forces of ONE MILLION PERSONS in no time at all.. never mind today with a 2.5 times the population of WW2 Canada and a MASSIVE manufacturing base in Ontario (ontario competes with Michigan (and passes sometimes) on number of vehicles built in North America, and produces large numbers of the worlds most advanced LAV military vehicles, it may only have hundreds of them in active duty but it manufactures THOUSANDS. Literally hundreds to thousands are sitting in the order completion lot at any given time) Oh..whats that? Canada has 16 million guns in the hands of civilians and is the most armed civilian populace out of the 20 most powerful nations on the planet next only to the Unites States?! Wow what an interesting fact, that would be lots of fun for the Russians lol. Even if every farmer/farm boy with a simple bolt action took out ONE russian soldier before being blown to pieces himself, the Russian army wouldn't even make it through ONE province (... fuck me and my buddies could rig up enough traps and bring enough guns with us to kill 10 times our number before we inevitably take a tank round to the face. Fun fact. Canada = Small United States. Nobody in their right mind would try to attack the U.S even if the U.S had no military... and Canada is no exception. A small but highly trained, deadly military with superior tanks to the russians, far superior LAV's, most of which can take out older Russian tanks (which make up the bulk of the Russian tanks lol), on home soil...with overwhelming militia support (literally in the potential millions). And all spread out over the second largest land mass on earth that would be completely impossible to control or occupy. Never mind the Canadian ability to replenish resources due to defenders advantage. Never mind the hundreds of thousands of Veterans who still have their training, experience and guns who would lead hundreds of thousands of Canadian Militia in a hilarious slaughter of the Russians. "Ya but the Russians got soooooo many Tanks!!!"" Ya ok so they are just gunna ship all 22,000 tanks to Canada and leave Russia totally defenseless lol? And since we've established that their infantry shitty force will easily get wiped out what are those tanks going to do with no infantry support? Run out of ammo and chase Canadian soldiers/militia around trying to run them over until they run out of fuel lol? The Russian air force would be useless because there WOULD BE NOTHING TO SUPPORT after a few weeks. The funds required to conquer Canada would result in the complete collapse of Russia back home, they would defeat themselves lol. I mean... do I have to reiterate on the whole Russia being poorer than Canada thing again? Thats why Canada is a G7 nation, and Russia isn't (but sometimes its included in the "G8"). A G7 Nation that has more guns than anyone else... save for our Bro's to the south. Russia wouldn't last long. Get real.

[@CarloFuller]

@@kanuckistanprepper5321 Russia just gonna nuke u lol😂. I didnt mean a conventional war

[@saintsolider3359]

@@CarloFuller Haha facts Russia could just nuke all the major Canadian Cities if they played dirty. However Canada is capable of building nukes so russia would be in trouble if Canada wanted revenge.

[@ramzi6289]

@@kanuckistanprepper5321 You have a good imagination, my canadian friend)

[@PitboyHarmony1]

There is no potential 'If America didnt get involved' scenario. Thats not because of any connection between Canada and the US, even if we hated each other, the US wouldnt let it happen. Why? Because the 49th parallel is just too close for Russia to be, to the US, its just too close. All potential first strike and response capabilities fall apart if all Russia has to do it lob nukes over a border, and there is no way the US would ever stand for that loss of strategic advantage. The other problem here is, 85% of the Canadian population and its centres are close to the border, which means there is no one or anything of any value up north to bother capturing. Add to that the seriously dense forest to get south and you're not going anywhere. Add to that the west coast (the easiest access to Canada) is a rock with a full dense forest on top of it. There is no long stretches of beaches like France. The only way in by sea, is the Vancouver Juan de Fuca Straight ... and if you have ever been there, you would quickly realise that you don't want to be sailing aircraft carriers and destroyers in there, you wouldnt last long and it would be difficult to escape from. All in all ... it wouldnt be a minor success, but likely a dismal failure ... and a pretty dumb idea to waste a video on.

[@Armysqueaky4159]

A It's called a stimulation B I see so many errors when ur typing this C u probably spend 5mins of ur life and barely any likes

[@PitboyHarmony1]

@@Armysqueaky4159 - A - I know ... duh. But an incomplete or incorrect simulation (not sTimulation) can be discussed as we like on a public forum, you need to let go of needing to bash on someone if you have nothing to add, makes you look childish. B - Name one factual error, just one. You cant, because you have no idea regarding the reality of the subject. If you mean spelling or grammatical error ... name that as well, as in comparison your spelling and grammar suggests that you're either native to another language, or ... just that unlearned and illiterate. I mean really ... read what you wrote ... really. C - See above ... possibly the worst grammar I have seen today online, and thats saying something, well done. Otherwise you seem to need to insult others for contributing to the conversation ... try therapy for self-hate / self esteem as well as potentially a psychosis. The only other reason you may blurt on a thread like this is to purposefully hate on others, possibly due to mommy/daddy issues growing up, leaving you to think the only to be strong is by bullying. Either way, just leave intelligent debate to the adults.

[@picklewithinternet2254]

@@PitboyHarmony1 "hi 911 I would like to report a murder"

[@XDJGYT04]

Russia wouldn’t invade Canada even if the us wasn’t involved because the 🇬🇧 🇦🇺🇳🇿 would join together to defend Canada

[@clockworkNate]

Yea you mess with one of us you mess with all of us. Too bad Ukraine didn't figure that out earlier.

[@sabin97]

@@clockworkNate i mess with the anglosphere all the time. you are free to come murder me. i have no guns or combat training of any kind. so i'm an easy target. also i'm a brown non-christian who speaks a langauge the average monoglot of usakistan(or england too) cant understand....so there's your motivation.

[@lalalasuper1]

Its crazy how people can't grasp a hypothetical and refuse the idea of USA being neutral

[@ryanpiercy3390]

to be fair, the us has had solid relations with Canada for over 200 years. The idea of standing by while an unfriendly nation attacks their soil is very unrealistic to the US.

[@piranhaplantX]

@@ryanpiercy3390 Not to mention the fact that any Russian invasion of Canada would put Russian naval and air assets uncomfortably close to US territory. At which point, neutral or not, the US would likely tell them to back off. Which would further limit their avenues of attack for both naval and air assets. Then there is the idea of the US somehow allowing a Russian occupation of ground on its immediate northern land border. At some point the US would be forced to act.

[@looinrims]

Thank you

[@ravenmoon5111]

Yeah that’s pretty impossible for us in the lower 48 to imagine. But, if the US was forced to be neutral, there would be millions of American volunteers with their private F-35 and M1 Abrams tanks. Not unlike those Russian volunteers in Korea

[@looinrims]

@@ravenmoon5111 more like those Russian ‘patriots’ in Ukraine

[@laetrille]

Shows how utterly defenseless western countries are without the USA.

[@HeyImLucious]

@Elliott Ryersee You are forgetting that this hypothetical war has a 1-year cutoff. Russia could take more at less cost in a more realistic scenario where they dragged it out over many years since Russia could establish naval and air superiority over half of Canada while they slowly expand inward from whichever western beachhead they chose.

[@oneofmanyparadoxfans5447]

@@HeyImLucious Canada's military does have the home team advantage though, they can more easily navigate the terrain and as such make use of guerilla tactics which will serve to further damage Russian morale. Even over an extended timeframe, the Russians will ultimately have another Winter War, which was a Pyrrhic victory.

[@HeyImLucious]

@@oneofmanyparadoxfans5447 In theory I agree with you there, nobody has really found a good answer to asymmetrical warfare. But do you think Canada would be able to pull off such a feat? The Winter War wasn't an easy undertaking for the Fins, but lets ignore stuff like the effect that their national history had on their morale, which is difficult to quantify, and look at something like Canada's demographics. By and far they're kinda old, with the average person being 35+ years old. That's approaching the end of prime combat years. Older people can fight, obviously, but not as effectively as someone in their 20s.

[@oneofmanyparadoxfans5447]

@@HeyImLucious You'd be surprised at how long some soldiers have kept fighting. One Japanese soldier kept fighting WWII decades after it officially ended, and when he surrendered the guy had to be well past enlisting age even by IJA and IJN standards. Some Vietcong were also in that age range, and continued to fight in the guerilla warfare style that the Vietcong were famous (or, depending on who you ask, infamous) for.

[@HeyImLucious]

@@oneofmanyparadoxfans5447 As I said, older people can fight. But both examples you just gave (Japan and Vietnam) involved a vast majority of soldiers in their prime years. Older & more experienced soldiers are better suited to leading/logistics, not front-line combat. The Fins (just like the Vietcong) had more than enough young men to fight effectively. Canada? Not nearly as much.

[@williamkirkland2222]

yeah, you completely glossed over Canada's "3 walls" defence. The rockies on the west, st Lawrence river in the east, and 1500 KM of desolate tundra to the north. and "both sides are used to the snow" doesn't count when Russia can't fly resupply missions to its forward bases for 6 months out of the year - the Russians would freeze after they ran out of oil for generators. there are no trees to burn that far north sir. also, you can't land troops in labrador - it's 1000km of tundra and one highway - with 6 bridges Canada would blow up. you also forgot that Canada is fucking massive, and our population is all within 100KM of the us border - you cannot land north and expect to set up a forward base that can reach our population centers or centers of production.

[@ianskinner1619]

Canadian military is equipment depleted and strung out. they are down on personnel by over 20% and bleeding troops, militia/reserve is at an all time low, technical's are spread thin to 'train' various CAF and militia units. These 'walls' mean nothing when the red team has the mobility and air superiority to do what they want in their own time. There are some serious hill boys that will lay a beating on most Russian troops and be into the action fast, but they are extremely limited and once gone, the window is no longer valid to train them. CAF is not and never was a stand alone force..

[@Sairam_chintalapudi]

U say russia will be out of oil for gens !! Seriously u need to learn Russian oil sources

[@skyraptor699]

Not to mention he thinks we only have 30k troops lol

[@chuckb11]

@@ianskinner1619 So is the Russian's. A lot of their armament are soviet era teach/gear, or retrofitted soviet era stuff. Not to mention most of the vast armed forces they talk about are actually conscripts on one year tours who they can only afford to actually have in use for three months of the year.

[@stap1er]

Now with recent events in mind, turns out Russia can't invade anything

[@againstviralmisinformation510]

Much less America

[@Hypercannon77]

True 😂

[@stap1er]

@@againstviralmisinformation510 To be fair they occupied those middle eastern countries for many years. What they couldn't do was regime change.

[@againstviralmisinformation510]

@@stap1er correct. It was a loss

[@stap1er]

@@againstviralmisinformation510 yes but it shows strength as well as weakness. Uganda probably wouldn’t have been able to hold most of Afghan for that long for example.

[@ponraul1221]

Most Canadians also live within 150km of the American border, so add that to the distance. The North also have no roads and is filled with marshes and very thick forests.

[@johonanandrewgomes7593]

Only Nunavut has no roads

[@tirpitz4657]

We have roads. Except Nunavut, they have no roads.

[@Communist-Doge]

In reality, the US and UK and rest of NATO would never abandon Canada. :D But it's interesting to imagine these types of 1v1 scenarios.

[@ganardian6224]

snowball fight, russia lost lol

[@mickeyg7219]

Even if the US hated Canada (it doesn't), the US won't let Russia build bases next to it. It's a strategic decision.

[@cherrybomb4026]

Honestly, I don't think Canada could lose because if the Russians took the west coast then the Canadians would just dig in at the Rockies and blow up the roads and the Russians would be screwed, and then the Canadians could focus on the east coast pushing them out. And by then many more people would join the Canadian military and the Russians would be outnumbered and supplies would be running low.

[@liketoknow6566]

One major problem with your analysis. Canadians in every world war has been able to amass a large military in a short time and Canadians are amongst the best trained in the world. Your analysis is based on the assumption that Canada would not build up it armed forces quickly. From what we are seeing from the current Russian invasion in Ukraine, the Russian Army is poorly equipped and using substandard equipment. The Russian army tactics are at best poorly organized. I would guarantee that Canada would have a million person armed forces within a number of months.

[@xSnakeByte]

10:00 "snow-wise Canada isnt actually completely covered throughout the year" Some people actually think it is? lol

[@Maple_Vally]

Yeah during the summer it gets up to like 30-40 degrees Celsius or for the Americans 86-104 Fahrenheit its not always cold lol

[@scipio_stan]

I live near Toronto and one time it got over 40 degrees Celsius

[@r.s.334]

I used this think this might be accurate, but after the clusterf*ck in Ukraine, I am not so sure.

[@penumbra604]

I feel like the distances presented in this scenario and the EXTREME difficultly passing over the land are being a little understated. Even for areas without permafrost, the ground becomes impassable in the summer. It is still an interesting exercise but owning more uninhabitable land doesn't seem worth any sort of effort let alone what Russia would have to do.

[@johnladuke6475]

Right? He's like "they could land on the shores of the Yukon" and I'm thinking "so they can climb a mountain range before getting to a road?"

[@davidschultz682]

thanks for doing a Canadian one. Actually been in the Canadian Army seen the state of the equipment myself I think we'd do a lot more poorly.

[@lego501stTrigger]

Yeah I doubt we could really do a thing useful, Russia would just capture our Northern Archipelago and start massing troops and supplies to cross to the mainland. There's literally only 120 professional soldiers guarding the whole of our Northern Territories. Nunavut has no roads connecting it to the rest of the country. Maybe we could stop a push on Yellowknife or Whitehorse, but the rest of the north would be captured with only a couple Russians injured from hypothermia. We just don't have the numbers or equipment to be able to defend

[@meowmix3129]

Yep. A lot of the equipment is left over from a previous war....the war of 1812!

[@silentscope666]

Remember that the standard russian troop is issued even older equipment than our stuff. Deployed canadian troops have some nice toys that are never seen at home btw.

[@sylinic6081]

If you've been to the army you would at least know that an invasion from Russia by sea would be pretty much impossible for them.

[@Hypercannon77]

As a Canadian I just wanna say thanks for your service brother 🙏

[@cookatktown]

They forgot the x factor everybody knows Canadians love their maple syrup but mix that with crude oil and you have Canadian napalm

[@ARC-Driver]

Oi BLYAT

[@alaskanbullworm5500]

The Russian advance would be halted at Sunnyvale trailer park, by a lone, old supervisor who has become the liquor, more powerful than Putin could ever imagine.

[@wetdog3664]

Alaskan bull worm god rest his soul

[@РоманЗолотилин-с8щ]

Да все русские решили выпить водки и не пошли оккупировать Канаду

[@marky0140]

What the tourism board doesn't want me to tell you is just about everything North of Edmonton in Canada is thick swamp and ludicrous numbers of trees.

[@paulthiessen6467]

5000 Canadian Rangers say “bring it on!” I’ll go start the snowmobile

[@lego501stTrigger]

*500lb guided bomb lands on him

[@harmen4436]

Nobody: Not a living soul Binkov: CoUlD RuSsIa iNvAdE cAnAdA

[@ospray1888]

First of all, invading Canada isn’t nice.

[@HeyImLucious]

New hypothetical- Russia strategically bombs all maple syrup factories in Canada. How quickly until Canada's entire population calls for blood?

[@bear8ful]

Sorry.

[@LordOfTheEyebots]

Dude, not only do us yukonners know the territory VERY well, we're known for hunting... and as many comments are saying, many Canadians have hunting rifles... Russia would have another winter war... and on top of that, the vast majority of Canada is forest, marsh, and lakes... a logistical nightmare for any force to cross... we could withdraw and lead the Russians into a muddy, watery, bloody, guerilla filled death trap... it'd be carnage

[@lexiansalewit]

Yes :)

[@lexiansalewit]

I’m the rez, they are a lot of gun stores for protection

[@dt41105]

I live in northermn Quebec and thinking you can move here up north with tank is a joke, theres like 1 road leading to montreal, the 117, it would be easier invading thru the atlantic and being fired at all the way to montreal, ottawa and toronto than going north, labrador and Yukon is the same, only 1 road, i think it would even be easier going thru the USA and the US army than going north, guys i can hardly make 1km with my atv before getting stuck, i cannot think an army trying to get thru.

[@TheObsidianX]

I was thinking that the whole time but with the west coast, once they get past Vancouver it’s all mountains with very few roads. The Russians would be fighting through a massive bottleneck all the way to Alberta.

[@raymondcoventry1221]

The terrain and climate make any invasion of northern Canada completely impossible.

[@mikeneufield2855]

And the sheer size.. the far North of Canada here is roughly the size of Australia, an entire continent sized mass ,all on its own ..

[@mikeneufield2855]

@@AzaiReacts coming over the top , on the northern coast/ the Beaufort sea , its 600 miles to Yellowknife..and there's no or hardly any roads..&then guess what, you're still in the middle of nowhere, another 400 miles to say Ft McMurray.. which is still in Canada's far North.. so its a gigantic sized territory .thats not counting all the islands that go almost all the way to the North Pole..Canada is as tall as it is broad/wide. so its around 1000 miles of dead ground a lot of it muskeg /bogs ,to cross w almost no roads ,not counting the n. islands

[@mikeneufield2855]

@@AzaiReacts that's just the terrain not counting resistance, or the climate , and Canadians know a few things about winter ..

[@ruclov2931]

@@AzaiReacts idk ill take our chances in the snow over the Russians plus the "land" Russia would be holding would be inhabitable for large numbers anyway

[@TheNkp08]

Forgot to account for canada deploying their fleet of millions of evil ass geese

[@ratboy717]

Obviously this scenario would never play out in real life, alot of comments are missing the point. Its an interesting exercise to imagine how our military would function on its own. Plus thats like the whole point of this channel.

[@hockeyholic8]

We'd come to Canada's aid in an instant without hesitation, nobody messes with USA's hat!

[@autoloadedbaguette6756]

We protect your mainland from the Arctic winds, eh?

[@clockworkNate]

Ahem!! That's toque* Nobody messes with the States toque lol

[@bentremblay913]

Ok, i get your point but you make major mistake in your video. For the background, first of all, im a canadian soldier and i served in the artic. They are many airfield in the canadian artic. Sure they are smaller than the one in the south, but they are a dozen of them and each can store 2 to 6 plane with hangar, fuel and maintenance crew. Secondly, the regular army is not 33 000 strong but 60 000 strong. Also, in the north, canada relly ont the ranger corp, a corp made of native inuit who know the land like their pocket and would be trained to slow down and harass the ennemy. Another factor that you failed to mention is that the temperature is only -30 c•. This is before the wind factor (wich you gonna get alot in the north since there is basically no mountain or anything to break it) I went there two week and the average temperature was -45-60 c• and the coldest we got was -72 c• with the wind factor. At this temperature, oil freeze and electronic equipement freeze to. When we were there, all of our snowmobile needed to be alway running so that they dont freeze of. The land is harsh and impitoyable. Water is hard to get, food is scarce and even with radar, the land is almost impenetrable and you MUST have the local inuit to guide you. The russian would never be suitable to hold here. To sum up my point, our army is bigger, we got a lot of small airbase up north, we got trained soldier always in the north and the land is to arsh to even considered occupied it. Its also important that except for some military and native infrastructure in the north, all the cities and population of canada live in the south. Their will be literally thousand of miles of land with no infrastructure and no ressources for the russian to use, and since that they are not even 100 000 peoples living in the north of canada, they are not manny road and a lot of thic forest and hard terrain that no vehicule can travel on.

[@Olivershamoo]

@A Sad Soggy Waffle chill out

[@nick_ayers]

instead of worrying about your comment, worry about your grammar and spelling, dear god

[@nick_ayers]

@A Sad Soggy Waffle original reply, the huge paragraph

[@DavidtheNorseman]

@ben tremblay - all they have to do is conquer Toronto and Vancouver. Quebec will surrender and immediately make massive demands of their new 'overlords' and be in continuous revolt forever when Moscow doesn't make French the official language of Russia.....Toronto will surrender in about 30 minutes and Vancouver....well BC is a hard one to call. British Colombians are ... different.....Albertans will make a lot of noise but Calgary and Edmonton will surrender as soon as the Russians promise to force oil pipelines through BC.. It's all moot as the US would never allow anyone other than themselves to own Canada....Canadians in general are patriotic but our armed forces are no longer the hard bodied farmers and loggers of WWI and WWII, we are soft. If 50,000 Russian shock troops with equipment appeared out of containers in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver they'd own the place in a week without US involvement. Northern Canada requires Southern supplies in medicine etc so if you control the major Southern cities you can take the North at your leisure....

[@danallanson5990]

@@nick_ayers I am guessing Mr.Tremblay is writing in his second language - or possibly his third, of which I commend him. Are you writing in your second language, which would possibly be Buffoon?

[@jasonnicholas8648]

Tradeu surrenders..😂 Vichy canada is formed.. Vichy canada goes Finland on russia...

[@goatfish480]

I've watched your videos for years and I gotta say no matter who's fighting who you always have top notch quality. Keep up the amazing work!

[@tractortrio7763]

However Canada is able to produce military equipment quickly. We started ww2 with less than 10 ships and ended the war with over 300.

[@sabin97]

in ww2 nobody was attacking you. your industry was intact. and you had help from your usakistani masters. in this particular scenario you;d be on your own trying to defend yourselves against russia. and lucky for you the scenario doesnt allow for nukes, otherwise it would end rather quickly.

[@mrlime9526]

@@sabin97Even then, Russia would be hundreds of miles away from Canadian industry, and in this case there would be even MORE of a push for militarization, Canada has more population, more infrastructure and more of a reason to fight in this scenario.

[@sabin97]

@@mrlime9526 i'm pretty sure russia is the one with more population. and you are aware of these flying machines they use nowaday? they can fly pretty far and destroy centers of industry.....and russia has significantly more of those than canada, and arguably of better quality. so yeah. completely different scenario from ww2.

[@m60pattoncovidiot29]

Russia: invades. Canada: I WILL BREAK A HOCKEY STICK OVER YOUR HEAD

[@samvortex2802]

We Canadians need to invest more in defense. We should at least double our military spending, and recruit another 2-4 divisions. At least keeping us a little bit competitive.

[@samvortex2802]

@Yuri Kovalenko our country is fine right now when it comes to people

[@samvortex2802]

@Yuri Kovalenko yeah eh no, do you know what poverty is?

[@jon9428]

Why invest more in military when we are a part of the commonwealth and our neighbor south does all the international leg work? How about more programs for the people like decriminalize drugs, add more funding to health care and dental, invest in more ecological infustructure and eco energy, ect

[@janehrahan5116]

@@samvortex2802 He is using the highly suspect (it was made by openly marxist professors) relative poverty metric, in terms of absolute poverty it is less than 1 in 100000 in canada. (The problem with relative poverty being it measures only envy of the wealthy and not actual standard of living)

[@firehazard4676]

Jon M the commonwealth isn't a military alliance, but besides that you guys shouldn't solely depend on us, and it'd be nice if we could get some more help militarily so we can spend more on our own people, like say in education so we don't elect another moron that wants to cause trouble between us, it'd be a win win.

[@ps123123]

Canadians are patriotic people. In WW2, one out of every 10 people volunteered to serve. We played a massive role. Not saying that would repeat itself, but there would be a great many amount of Canadians willing to die for their country, civilian or otherwise.

[@philmacgregor1374]

Right you are! Come up and attend our Remembrance Day and see how we support our military ! We have never lost a war

[@johnladuke6475]

Because in war the polite thing to do is fight people are afraid to fight back.

[@subtitleaddict5343]

1. Can UK conquer Ireland in one year? 2. Chile vs Australia on Antarctica 3. EU Vs Arab League 4. USA vs Arab League 5. ASEAN vs China 6. ASEAN vs India 7. ASEAN vs ANZAC 8. Unified Korea vs Japan 9. Unified Korea vs China 10. India vs USA 11. USA vs Rest of America(except Canada) 12. Second Korean War(USA+Japan+ROK vs DPRK+Russia+China) 13. Canada vs USA 14. Argentina vs Brazil 15. Nigeria vs Cameroon 16. Iran vs Turkey 17. USA vs EU

[@jonathanryan9946]

I'll take a stab at calling these for giggles 1) UK Victory 2) Australia Minor Victory 3) Arab League Minor Victory 4) USA Victory 5) China Minor Victory 6) India Minor Victory 7) ASEAN Minor Victory 8) Korea Minor Victory 9) China Victory 10) USA Minor Victory 11) USA Victory 12) depends on prep time, if little North Korea victory, if months or years of escalation Draw to South Korea Minor Victory 13) USA Victory 14) Brazil Minor Victory 15) Nigeria Victory 16) Turkey Minor Victory 17) USA Minor Victory Hopefully many of these will get covered, further I hope Binkov actually calls a few of them differently than I do. I like getting well thought out and differing opinions.

[@IGMattDaMan]

usa vs canada isn't needed as history tend to repeat itself....and we all know what happened there...twice ;D

[@TheOneWhoMightBe]

*Commonwealth intensifies*

[@fullmetalalchemist9126]

No it wouldn't

[@royalteluis623]

Hahaha get roasted

[@alexgorecki7282]

"If I had Canadian Soldiers, American technology and British officers I would rule the world" - Winston Churchill

[@charlesaghahowa7476]

And China numbers

[@matan7899]

true tho

[@humansvd3269]

British officers made some of the WORST mistakes in WW1, including Churchill.

[@humansvd3269]

@Roberto Salas As well as getting the USA into it when we had no interests or reason to do so.

[@humansvd3269]

@Roberto Salas If by USA, you mean Rockefeller and JP Morgan, sure. The average citizen wanted nothing to do with a European colonial spat. And yes, banking interests absolutely profited off the war.

[@knightsun2920]

The one thing you forgot is that Canada has approximately 2.5 million PAL firearm holders and very active reloading community. If just 10% of these members formed militias, that is 250k additional troops.

[@enotsnavdier6867]

@Jack Ripper Ontario is the most desirable province, It's the most populous and the richest

[@enotsnavdier6867]

@Jack Ripper Those "leftist loonies" have made Canada into one of the most successful economies in the world. Canada has only 38 million people, but is the 9th largest GDP on Earth, and it has a far lower population than any of the other nations close to it. Canada is one of the best of countries in the world, and being left wing is a large part of that.

[@enotsnavdier6867]

@Jack Ripper It's a good place if you have higher aspirations. It's one of the best economies, and it's among the easiest nations to start a business. If you want to live a life of depressing, alcoholic, poverty, move to Russia.

[@enotsnavdier6867]

@Jack Ripper The history of the US has been left wing revolution and progression. Though it's always had an unshakable taint of racism and conservatism. I hope that America becomes left wing, so it can finally have a good standard of living, and get rid of it's terrible criminal justice system.

[@enotsnavdier6867]

@Jack Ripper It's hilarious how terrible your understanding of reality is. Every time social progress occurred, conservatives stood in the way of it. Conservatives supported slavery, conservatives made up the KKK, conservatives were against the Civil Rights movement, conservatives were against gay marriage. The one constant in US history is that conservatives have constantly stood in the way of making the country a better place. Also you're an idiot if you're comparing the modern democrats with the old democratic part, it shows how little you know about US history, even a Canadian knows more about your history than you do. Look up the party switch, it'll show you how dumb what you're saying is. The American founding fathers themselves were far left for their time, the anti monarchy and liberal views were radically left wing. Do you know who disagreed with the American Revolution? It was Conservatives. The only role conservatism has played in American history is to be on the wrong side every time. And just like in the past, you and your fellow idiot conservatives will be on the losing side of history once again. History looks kindly on revolutionary thinkers, and none of them were conservative. Conservatism is ideologically opposed to progress. Conservatives are fated to be the losers of history, they always have been and always will be.