This amazing calculation in a Countdown Episode in 2002 is truly amazing in only 30 seconds
Пікірлер: 1 100
@rocketi053 жыл бұрын
He's on his way to winning that countdown teapot.
@shaitam5v3 жыл бұрын
No offence, Jeremy
@harribo2005x3 жыл бұрын
@@shaitam5v *Jeremy looks suspicious*
@CalumnMcAulay3 жыл бұрын
😆
@iceymonster46752 жыл бұрын
Good morning, that's a nice Tnetennba!
@DaveDexterMusic3 жыл бұрын
My approach is generally "10x75 = 750, +50 = 800. Eh, close enough"
@RandomPlaceHolderName3 жыл бұрын
100/25+1 for 805 nah?
@lcozzarelli3 жыл бұрын
I just added the 1 to that and called it a day
@georgielancaster13562 жыл бұрын
I did 10 x (75 +1) = 760 + 50 = 810 + (100 ÷ 25) = 814. Plus a bonus point for using all the numbers, which I take off 814 to get 813. 😇 😄
@eclectica12 жыл бұрын
But no points for you sunshine.
@georgelewis3652 жыл бұрын
@@georgielancaster1356 you used 1 twice, still a lot better than me though
@purgruv6 жыл бұрын
Good morning, that's a nice tnetennba.
@alancapybara33256 жыл бұрын
Moss on The IT Crowd lol
@joansmith696 жыл бұрын
Richard Ayoades portrayal on the Graham Linehan produced situational comedy IT Crowd on Channel 4, audible chuckles and nods towards a reference understood.
@tactical_nuk3g2905 жыл бұрын
That fully made me laugh so hard
@apotey47105 жыл бұрын
You're a hero :D:D:D:D
@crazedscot42485 жыл бұрын
I'm disabled
@superman00001 Жыл бұрын
He first doubles 813 in his head to get 1626 and recognises that is 1 away from a multiple of 25. And he knows how to quickly work out multiples of 25, so quickly realises he needs 65 of them. The rest snaps into place for him. Impressive.
@JohnnyBravo1878 Жыл бұрын
Very help, thank you
@superman00001 Жыл бұрын
@@JohnnyBravo1878 welcome
@jonathanlee2099 Жыл бұрын
It's really neat the solutions you can come up with some clever math like that
@Everton-Valley-2005 Жыл бұрын
He also knows before he chooses that 4 of the numbers will be 25,50,75,100 ...you can work off these alone to know all the variants...he also knows before that the 2 other numbers are between 1 and 10...its clever...he does his homework
@superman00001 Жыл бұрын
@@Everton-Valley-2005 Yes, indeed.
@paulgoodwin52065 жыл бұрын
It was a little showboating on last part. 100/50 =2 and so 1626 / 2 = 813 also. Fair play tho. Nice 10 points.
@b2ked5 жыл бұрын
Some people can think of that easier the way he did It bigger numbers are easier to work with
@hughmcilveen22355 жыл бұрын
No, he could not use the number 2, remember. No showboating. Brilliant.
@alandunstan54855 жыл бұрын
@@hughmcilveen2235 dividing by 2 would not have been showboating!!
@dancostello48725 жыл бұрын
@@hughmcilveen2235 if he gets the two by dividing the 100 by 50, he is allowed. So yes, he was showboating lol
@Frosty-oj6hw4 жыл бұрын
Yeah I finally saw how this was actually possible after this, he aimed for twice the target and to divide by 2, the last few steps were making it longer than it had to be, he could have done 100/50 to get 2 and then halfed the 1626. Still it's a clever solution.
@matthewiles57143 жыл бұрын
Doing this kind of maths is impressive at the best of times but doing this kind of maths within the 30 seconds is just crazy!
@yuenkentsang94462 жыл бұрын
Lol exactly to funny but I love it
@swagon45452 жыл бұрын
True...
@JB_inks Жыл бұрын
That's exactly what twice-nightly Whitely said
@oscarbrown244 жыл бұрын
And that's numberwang
@blainy-o934 жыл бұрын
Das ist Nümberwang!
@PIXPromosMore4 жыл бұрын
Yes! That is a Number!
@benwilliams48974 жыл бұрын
sorry that was actually wangernumb
@thoughtfortheday78114 жыл бұрын
@Oscar Brown, 😂 yes!
@i4TheWinN8 жыл бұрын
Rachel Riley would have Been able to solve that
@manuelwolff_intlcomedian7 жыл бұрын
You got 824.
@gunamerstravels7 жыл бұрын
Mike Fuller She only draws penises and acts like a child when on the 'COMEDY' show 8 out of 10 cats does Countdown. That show is just purely a bit of fun with no serious intentions.
@sherlockholmeslives.16057 жыл бұрын
OK! Fair enough!
@Scripture-Man7 жыл бұрын
I'm not going to pick favourites between Carol and Rachel as I like them both, but I will say that in clips like these, Carol always seems a little rude and condescending towards the contestants, almost like she's getting annoyed with them for being clever. I think Rachel is a little more humble.
@Trev3597 жыл бұрын
Rachel Riley's the one that's rude. I went off her very early on because of her agist comments.
@AJnzxv13 жыл бұрын
It’s mind boggling how in the space of 30 seconds he ruled out any easy way of doing it, and then managed to get it the way he did.
@@Jay369 That's the same method. It may seem to your mind simpler to lay it out that way but it's the same thing. The contestents mind probably works different from yours - ease is subjective.
@Jay3693 жыл бұрын
@@pocky1scot1 Ease is relative
@ViceroyoftheDiptera2 жыл бұрын
@@Jay369 that’s the exact same thing you muppet. Getting 1626 is the difficult part. How you choose to set up the final division by 2 is not what makes this easy or hard.
Why is her name in the title when she’s just gonna take his word on the maths🙄
@XxCauzhavokxX4 жыл бұрын
Rachel wouldve know that.
@jamiengo23434 жыл бұрын
Transit Money Card well no I think she did sort of know. 26 times 5 is 130, so you simply add the appropriate zeroes really. 16 times 5 is 80, add the appropriate zeroes, combine them and yeah he’s right
@Spacesnakes4744 жыл бұрын
@@jamiengo2343 I mean she was literally saying she was taking his word for it...
@jamiengo23434 жыл бұрын
Tiger474 it was more something you say instinctively, you know, when you’re doing something quickly and someone says something and you just respond
I mean... it's an impressive video, but the title seems to credit the wrong person. All she did was write it down.
@eliotmansfield3 жыл бұрын
clickbait
@bipolarminddroppings4 жыл бұрын
My favourite part of the comments is the amazement at the final 2 operations when all the clever stuff happened before that. Getting to 1626 was the hard part.
@darijoe13 жыл бұрын
Carol things the same as you when the says at the end, "That's very clever, this bit particularly" when she points to the workings to get from 65 to 1626.
@jameschristopher25404 ай бұрын
She does mention it and points at the work saying this bits clever
@TheFakeyCakeMaker5 жыл бұрын
I miss Richard Whitely so much. Great presenter. Brilliantly done young man.
@stevecooper70384 жыл бұрын
It's worse than that, he's dead Jim.
@TheRandomshite1233 жыл бұрын
Dooo doo dooo dooo duh duh duh duh *beeeeep*
@fortyfour16543 жыл бұрын
@@stevecooper7038 Well ...it's maths Jim... But not as we know it! Not as we know it Not as we know it. It's maths Jim. But not as we know it, Not as we know it Vorderman!
@iBrusmaN4 жыл бұрын
Can’t Believe it took him 30 seconds, I mean it’s right there...
@Isleofskye3 жыл бұрын
Exactly. I did it b4 the numbers came up...
@CHANtotheDAN3 жыл бұрын
@@Isleofskye same LOOOOOOL
@Isleofskye3 жыл бұрын
@@CHANtotheDAN :)
@CHANtotheDAN3 жыл бұрын
@@Isleofskye ;O
@DubiousMints3 жыл бұрын
Why the hell are these reply chains all arguing about whether Rachel riley or Carol vorderman is better at maths? They're both good and both hot, not much more to it.
@TheNuclearBolton3 жыл бұрын
Rachel Riley is better
@pjcamp1on3 жыл бұрын
@@TheNuclearBolton are you still talking about maths?
@TheNuclearBolton3 жыл бұрын
@@pjcamp1on yes, why? I think women who can do basic arithmetic in their heads are the bees knees.
@sp-pz8uc3 жыл бұрын
Carol's better at funeral advertisements. But Rachel might be in 30 years.
@CIMAmotor3 жыл бұрын
i like the fit Jewish one.
@jmo8934 Жыл бұрын
The bit where he adds the 1 just tops it off.
@lordrosemount2 жыл бұрын
Could this be the highest number ever reached in pursuit of a successful Countdown calculation? Strikes me that would be an interesting and notable record.
@annmaria2 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppfEZIB-gbGGjas
@allylilith5605 Жыл бұрын
I am sure numbers like 1000 or 950 have been reached easier
@MikeTaffet Жыл бұрын
@@allylilith5605I think they’re referring to the calculations getting into the 81,300 range
@allylilith5605 Жыл бұрын
@@MikeTaffet oh fair point actually
@TheSivhead Жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZqKZgYdqlslpeLs.
@GarrethFerreira3 жыл бұрын
At the end of the day he still achieved it in 30 secs, everyone here has hind sight
@Z561-k6j2 жыл бұрын
Nothing better than getting it done in 30 seconds eh.
@TiredofEarth Жыл бұрын
i couldnt do it in 30 seconds even though i just watched him do it in 30 seconds.. lmao
@davetootill Жыл бұрын
Getting to 1626 was the impressive part. He could have just divided 100 by 50 to get 2 and used that to divide 1626. Good going in 30secs though and who doesnt love a bit of showmanship sometimes.
@Stabichan Жыл бұрын
I'm pretty he knows. But for the lulz it's funnier to do *50 first
@listey9 ай бұрын
He did. Kind of.
@joe-s5r2 ай бұрын
I don't think it was showmanship. His thinking is simpler: For him it was just 1626 x 50/100 That's simpler than 1626 / (100/50). That requires a separate operation before you apply it to the 1626. His way just works left to right. He had 1626, and he had to halve it. He knows that 50/100 is 1/2 but you can't use fractions so you can't put brackets around it. He doesn't need to work out 50 x 1626. He knows that it must be the answer with two zeros. 813 + 00
@aaronwalderslade3 жыл бұрын
The last part (×50, ÷100) is actually just halving it. I think this lad knew his 25 times tables. He probably first doubled the target to get an even number, then searched his 25 times tables to find a number near that. Aha, 1625, it's only 1 away. Do I have a 1? And the 50 and 100 kept in reserve to halve it. I'm not saying I wasn't blown away though!
@flytoheights13 жыл бұрын
👍👏👏👏
@arconeagain3 жыл бұрын
You've got to think of it first. You can't just come in late, dissect it and say it's easy. That would likely be seen as foolish, even egotistical.
@silkyfirst30973 жыл бұрын
@@arconeagain maybe he doesnt know his 25 times tables but his 5 times tables very well 🤔
@shalimarlake78522 жыл бұрын
I mean you see a 25, you look for multiples of 25, find 1624, add one, and then figure out if 25 divides into one of your numbers
@jmo8934 Жыл бұрын
They write all of the times tables down in front of them in advance which helps.
@simonchurchman3801 Жыл бұрын
Carol is ignorant in my opinion. She is there to write the numbers down and not laugh and belittle the guests…. great great great young man for solving it ,,and manners to boot
@WaterCrane3 жыл бұрын
1:09 I love the almost disbelief and "are you serious?!" tone from Carol... "Add 1".
@josephkane780510 ай бұрын
OMG! Where are you going with this?
@liamholton89376 жыл бұрын
All I got was Tnetennba.....
@rossmarshall69604 жыл бұрын
Racist
@zombi28964 жыл бұрын
@@rossmarshall6960 no
@ddr_drogba7773 жыл бұрын
That was good. But anyone who understands it can see how he put it. He could have simply divided 100 by 50 & then divided 1626 by 2. The real amazing step for me was how he got fo 1626! BONKERS
@Nullifidian3 жыл бұрын
His method for getting to 1626 is based on the fact that you can make 937.5 with the four large numbers: 75 x 50 x 25 / 100 = 937.5. Now, that looks like it's miles away from the target, but by distributing in the 10 first, he does the equivalent of 75 x 25 - 25 x 10 = 1625, and since he knows that he's going to be doing the equivalent of division by two (50 / 100 = 1 / 2) that it will turn into 937.5 - 125 = 812.5. Now he needs to add something that will be equal to 0.5 when it's divided by two. In other words, he needs a 1 - and he has a 1. So (75 x 25 + 1) x 50 / 100 = 813.
@ViceroyoftheDiptera2 жыл бұрын
Thanks captain obvious.
@carkod3 жыл бұрын
Why does she keep laughing for not being able to do double digit multiplication?
@peterclarke7240 Жыл бұрын
I love Carol. She will always be the Countdown Queen in my eyes.
@Acanofbeer6 ай бұрын
We still miss you Richard. R.I.P. 😢😊👌🏴
@stephentrudgeon26464 жыл бұрын
I paused this for 5 mins, still nowhere near, pretty impressive
@iball3103694 жыл бұрын
Probably maths now. Love it
@kevinlongman0074 жыл бұрын
The title of the video suggests Vorderman did this calculation.
@joe_z3 ай бұрын
The 813 trick uses the same mechanism as the tricks with the numbers close to 937.5. 937.5 is the result of 25 * 75 / 2 or 15/16 of 1,000, and 812.5 is 13/16 of 1,000, meaning that it's 25 * 65 / 2. From there you notice that it's convenient that you have a 10 there to get the 75 to 65, and a 1 there to tap it up before dividing by 2, taking the final result from 812.5 to 813.
@DaveDexterMusic3 жыл бұрын
"It's very clever, this bit particularly" *gestures at entire calculation*
@DerEchteBold Жыл бұрын
She meant the +1
@madpaduk Жыл бұрын
If I'd taken all week I'd not have managed this. All credit deserved and taken by the lad.
@CancelRevival Жыл бұрын
This guy is a phony. When he had 1626, he knew that all he had to do was divide 100 by 50 to get 2, then divide 1626 by 2 to get the answer. But he decided to go the long way just to look good to people who didn't realize. James Martin in 1997 is the real one.
@patthewoodboy3 жыл бұрын
I'm taking your word for it .. proves she isnt such a maths expert
@pauldavis56653 жыл бұрын
I know right. 1626 x 50 is very easy to do in your head. Just do 1626 x 100 which is simple, just add two 0's. Then cut it in half. What is so hard lady?
@ZValenT3 жыл бұрын
I fink I've got eight one free
@zylo40293 жыл бұрын
I thought I did well with 811. Then I realised that was with several minutes and not only did he beat me, he did in the spotlight and in 30 seconds
@asphinctersayswott7 жыл бұрын
I got 211
@namxxn3 жыл бұрын
LMAO 211 LIKES IM CRYING
@CmonInn3 жыл бұрын
@@namxxn yes crazy
@Deady20124 жыл бұрын
He’ll be alright at homeschooling...
@alanbevan94323 жыл бұрын
I think Carroll has a new body now 🤔
@eksiarvamus10 ай бұрын
The way it is shown here makes it way more complicated than it really is. He could have divided 100 by 50 and gotten a 2 which he could have used to divide 1626 with.
@alexf73778 ай бұрын
He knew that of course. In modern lingo, it's what they call a flex, i.e. showing off.
@icarus-wings2 жыл бұрын
KZbin comments: I can’t figure it out. Also KZbin comments: x50 /100 is just dividing by 2. Not impressed.
@mygoogle76844 жыл бұрын
Nervous laughter from Carol indicating that she cant keep up.
@Isleofskye3 жыл бұрын
I love Carol but unlike Rachel she never could keep up. Saw her asked an easy maths question on Would I Lie To You and she could not answer it !
@josephmathmusic2 жыл бұрын
The 1626 is really clever. The × 50 / 100 is just for fun we can divide by (100/50)...
@stuartharris21654 жыл бұрын
He had no reason to go up so high, when you get to 1626, you only needed to say 1626/(100/50).
@thehawks33924 жыл бұрын
ye I thought that too. it was uneccesary to go that high
@Ingestedbanjo4 жыл бұрын
He had a reason - to show off. Whether you personally think that's a legit reason or not though...
@Utoko4 жыл бұрын
there is also no reason not to go so high.
@johno33264 жыл бұрын
Show boat, yes, but fun to watch
@toddhunter31374 жыл бұрын
He didn't need to that high, but it made great television! 😉
@dazthemod693 жыл бұрын
I bet he’s a master of street countdown
@beatnikmary5 жыл бұрын
This guy came on as a guest team member on Cats Does Countdown one time.
@bravo2966 Жыл бұрын
Once he got to 1626 he knew all he had to do was divide by 2. He could get the 2 by 100/50 of course, but a fancier way is multiply by 50 then divide by 100. Knowing the result will be 813 you know the multiply by 50 will give the 81300. Very very clever chap to come up with that in 30 seconds, though of course it's a solid knowledge of his 25 x table.
@lsbrother5 жыл бұрын
What was impressive was that Vorderman clearly hadn't done it!
@Rk-xx1sg3 жыл бұрын
she did it by dividing 1626/2 most likely
@ViceroyoftheDiptera2 жыл бұрын
@@Rk-xx1sg the final part is the trivial part. Getting 1626 is what’s hard; if she didn’t manage it (which it doesn’t seem she did), that’ll be where she missed out.
@Rk-xx1sg2 жыл бұрын
@@ViceroyoftheDiptera okay
@JimmyBoosterCrate2 жыл бұрын
@@Rk-xx1sg 1626/2 is definitely out of Carol's range. She's not that good. Rachel maybe could've got it
@DutchDread4 ай бұрын
Honestly, the moment it said 1626 I thought "ah, nice, divide by 2" so when the dude said "multiply by 50" I just thought "oh, must be a 100 left then, so it's just the score with 00 behind it". The fact that carol had to "take his word for it" was pretty dumb.
@matlew1960 Жыл бұрын
This is what they call "Thinking outside the box". Even Carol Vorderman was impressed. And that's a great complement..
@kermit56780 Жыл бұрын
The scene was cut out where Carol vorderman proceeded to throw her knickers at him 🤣
@garyella1301 Жыл бұрын
You say it like she would have been wearing them 😂
@mclarenguy2211 жыл бұрын
81,300 must be the highest solution in Countdown history!
@sp-pz8uc3 жыл бұрын
You can tell she's pissed, for him getting it, when she couldn't.
@ropea14275 жыл бұрын
Dianne abbot can up with 23,456,985
@presidentelectzigenpuss35705 жыл бұрын
she's Rachel Riley's stand-in
@everythingandanything30455 жыл бұрын
Lol
@ericdunn5554 жыл бұрын
LOL. Pritti Vacant, oops sorry Patel, got 197, 034 853 145, which was close enough for her.
@studio-flash5 жыл бұрын
I know carol has had a boob job and face job since this old video....but as you can see from this also she has had arse implants..because her arse isnt that special here..compared to her huge pair shaped " porno arse" she has today..just goes to show eh..
@apbosh13 жыл бұрын
It must be great to do maths that quickly in your mind. Sadly something i will never experience but wow. I can make a nice spag bol, have to settle for that!
@04mdsimps Жыл бұрын
Wonder what he has achieved in the 21 years since
@SteveNinetyski4 жыл бұрын
By my calculation, Carol would fucking get it.
@JimmyBoosterCrate3 жыл бұрын
Carol wasn't good enough for huge numbers. Look at the 952 video, she's overwhelmed. Rachel would have had more of a shot
@ViceroyoftheDiptera2 жыл бұрын
In the comments: people trying to be smart by rewording the division by 2.
@charleyyy_19955 жыл бұрын
Episode 4051 (3200 shows later was on the 1st episode of 2019).
@grumpywasp45333 жыл бұрын
Brilliant!
@JM196493 жыл бұрын
Carols reaction is poor.. as someone who is very intelligent she shouldn't find it funny.. it should be obvious to her or she should at least show respect for the calculation
@bettyboo82143 жыл бұрын
Carol was rubbish at maths.
@Nullifidian3 жыл бұрын
@@bettyboo8214 She really was. When Alex Horne, who's now most well-known from his appearances with his band on _Cats Does Countdown_ was on the regular _Countdown_ for the first time (episode # 4654 on 26 August 2008 with Jeremy Miles), there was this numbers problem: 100, 75, 50, 25, 9, 2 = 678. Carol said this was difficult because once you multiplied 75 x 9 there was "no way" of getting 3 with the remaining numbers. And when she did belatedly solve it after the advertising break, she even held back the 75 by multiplying (100 - 25) x 9 first and only then doing (75 x 2) / 50 = 3. She didn't see that the two 75s-the one made by 100 - 25 and the one on the board-were absolutely the same number. It was one of the most bizarre things I'd seen from someone who was supposed to be a maths expert. But that was soon overshadowed when I saw Tanmay Dixit's first episode against Sue Drinkwater on 21 March 2005 (episode # 3891). They had the problem 50, 4, 3, 8, 4, 9 ---> 950, and Carol said it was difficult because there was no way of adding the small numbers up to get 19. Despite 8 + 4 + 4 + 3 being 19.
@Scubadooper3 жыл бұрын
Knowing his 8x table, clever! 8x8 = 64 1/8 = 0.125 Using the 1 before dividing by 2 (100/50) to bring it up from 812.5 to 813 Very clever
@shaun2k248 ай бұрын
Funny seeing people explaing how to get a 2 after his hard work,
@oludotunjohnshowemimo4345 жыл бұрын
Now this was the proper Countdown with Carol Voderman and the late Richard Whiteley.
@flynnnnnnnnnnn Жыл бұрын
Wrong caption, Carol was good, but she hadn't a clue there
@Scripture-Man7 жыл бұрын
The title of this video is totally misleading. I was expecting Carol to do something impressive here. This video really has nothing to do with her, and in fact she seems a little rude and condescending towards the contestant in this video.
@ericdunn5554 жыл бұрын
I think it was nervous laughter (she was concerned that he was going to make a fool of himself) and also she was laughing out of sheer incredulity (something most of us do) when the numbers were going completely out of the ball park. I imagine (though I could be wrong) that it is very unlikely she has seen a calculation on the show go to such an astronomically high number during the calculation.
@travelwell6049 Жыл бұрын
Then maybe he could cover for Rachel when she takes a day off.
@LorrdFfuzyLogik7 жыл бұрын
I can do that too. Don't ask for proof, just do the smart thing and take my word for it.
@viscen52017 жыл бұрын
LorrdFfuzyLogik it's not exactly the hardest of maths lol
@LorrdFfuzyLogik7 жыл бұрын
I have something hard to show you. ;)
@philwoodward5069 Жыл бұрын
I got (75+1) * 10 = 760 760 + 50 + (100/25) = 814 and that would almost always be enough to at least share the points. But sometimes you've just got to take your hat off.
@KD555 Жыл бұрын
I've done exactly the same in under 30s. But no way I'd find the 65×25+1 of his in that timeframe.
@ddrolet99786 жыл бұрын
"I'll take your word for it" no wonder they got Rachel Riley on instead
@marcpower41675 жыл бұрын
DDrolet997 I'm sure someone backstage confirmed with a calculator.
@sabre22b5 жыл бұрын
Yuh, an upgrade intellectually at least.
@mattcullen61094 жыл бұрын
Yep live seen Riley unable to solve an equation. I guess Carol didn't need to try to show off
@madabbafan4 жыл бұрын
No they got her only because Carol quit (several years after this episode was shown). I've seen that Riley female fail far more times that Carol did.
@bipolarminddroppings4 жыл бұрын
If you think she didn't already know how he would finish it when he said multiply by 50, you've clearly not seen much of Carol Vorderman. She knows he's right, and that the next thing he is going to do is divide by 100 because she can already see the simple solution of 100/50=2, 1626/2 = 813. Therefore, (1626*50)/100 is also 813, it's the same operation as before just rearranged, that's how maths works. She knows that he is correct because if the final answer is 813 and all he has left is 100, so he's clearly going be dividing by it, so 1626*50 must be 81,300.
@royboy63013 жыл бұрын
Before the big knockers, and leather gear etc.
@ilovefacebookandebay6 жыл бұрын
30 seconds. Bloody hell. It would have taken me two years to figure out !!!
@Isleofskye5 ай бұрын
Your comment was 6 years ago and I am still not quite there yet/...
@GH-lo8vl4 жыл бұрын
So what do you want to study at cambridge? Well I want to study a subject that will benefit me in future life, but I'll probably get brainwashed into hating the British and everything they stand for.
@LiamEFC.4 жыл бұрын
could have divided 50 by 100 for 2 and then 1626 / 2 , but great job 😁
@LiamEFC.4 жыл бұрын
or even better 100/50 for 2. Apparently I can't do maths lol
@BroomeBlocker4 Жыл бұрын
This would be the point where the opponent stealthily just leaves the building
@morganwhymark32934 жыл бұрын
Damn I would have only got 814... 813 that's clever!
@Debbie763 жыл бұрын
Me too. I thought I was good getting that in the 30 seconds 🙂
@Metynis6663 жыл бұрын
00:24 it was at this moment he knew :D or like wait a minute :)
@msolec20006 жыл бұрын
I had gotten a decent 814 (75+1) * 10 + 50 + (100/25)
@RGP_Maths4 жыл бұрын
Same!
@theguardian308 Жыл бұрын
Rachel Riley will always be the GOAT
@tonybidwell25826 жыл бұрын
1:22 What a show-off! LMAO
@yatoproductions1634 жыл бұрын
Well he didnt need to know what 1626 times 50 was, he simply needed to know 1626 was twice 813 which was the goal number. Thus is becuase timesing 1626 by 50 then dividing by 100 is equivalent to dividing 1626 by 2.
@jamiesimms70844 жыл бұрын
@@yatoproductions163 1 times 50 is 50 and if you divided 50 by 100 it's 0.05 which is the same as dividing 1 by 2
@TheJohnCooperShow3 жыл бұрын
Richard whitely was born to be host of this show
@connorism694 жыл бұрын
Lol, I got this one, but not within the 30 seconds... This guy is too good.
@Matt19matt194 жыл бұрын
So basically just make it really complicated and she'll take your word for it. Easy 10 points.
@andywright88034 жыл бұрын
Not really complicated at all. Basically, once he had got to
@bipolarminddroppings4 жыл бұрын
She already knew what his last operation was going to be, divide by 100. Therefore, 1626*50 must be 81300. You know how she knew this? because 100/50=2, 1626/2=813. It's just about rearranging the operations.
@vykkye Жыл бұрын
Thinking mans crumpet that
@tonelemoan4 жыл бұрын
"Carol you're literally laughing at numbers."
@kieranmahoney4446 Жыл бұрын
Countdown showboating love it
@ParthaDey9710 жыл бұрын
Very clever! He didn't need to multiply by 50 and divide by 100, but it makes it looks all the more impressive! :) ((75-10) x 25) + 1) / (100/50) Amazing work in 30 seconds :D
@ginger54226 жыл бұрын
AT the start of the equation would have 3 brackets not 2
@hughmcilveen22355 жыл бұрын
No, he had to divide that way. He can only use the numbers on the board.
@alandunstan54855 жыл бұрын
@@hughmcilveen2235 if that is the case, he couldn't have done the multiplication either since 65 is not on the board either!!
@alandunstan54855 жыл бұрын
@Justin My comment was only directed to Hugh and referenced his 2nd sentence. Please read it and tell me what you think it says.
@bipolarminddroppings4 жыл бұрын
@@hughmcilveen2235 No he didn't. You can use the numbers you generate by doing operations, he literally did it in his explanation. So he had the choice to do 100/50=2, 1626/2=813.
@stephenmanuel98604 жыл бұрын
KZbin Recommendation Roulette favours me tonight, it seems.
@ona9076 жыл бұрын
What a legend!
@socks24413 ай бұрын
its interesting how much this show has changed. it used to have regular legit geniuses, now it still has a few geniuses, but they are comedic genius, not mathematics geniuses. its arguably a better show now, as the audience can play along without feeling overly stupid. and there are good jokes. but wow those maths skills back in the day are incredible.
@joe-s5r2 ай бұрын
Are you sure you're not thinking about '8 out of 10 Cats Does Countdown'? That's a spin-off with paid comedians instead of contestants selected from the public. The original still runs alongside it, and is more serious without much joking around.
@socks24412 ай бұрын
@@joe-s5r i absolutely was thinking of 8 out of 10 cats. i had no idea the original show was still running along side it. i assumed int 'evolved' into a comedy version of itself to entertain a wider audience or something. thanks for correcting me :)
@samharper58816 жыл бұрын
1626x50 being mysterious to Carol shows why she's hugely inferior to Rachel and even most number-literate people. The fact that x50 is /2 and add a couple of 0s shouldn't be difficult for anyone who's supposedly good at maths.
@NY-Dani Жыл бұрын
Wonder what he is today?
@markjeffers46634 жыл бұрын
Frigging unreal how he worked that out
@Edward-qe8xg4 жыл бұрын
The first part was, the 2nd part was just a long way of dividing by 2, by x100 and /50, which is possible by just doing 100/50 to get 2 and dividing the number by 2. Basically just showing off unnecessarily, but still impressive with limited numbers
@SleepyRPGman2 жыл бұрын
once he got to 1626, it makes more sense to divide 100/50 = 2 then divide 1626 by the 2. less big numbers.
@Ashley197217 жыл бұрын
I thought Carol Vorderman was going to solve it, i didn't want to listen to him showing off. The title is misleading frankly!
@qwertyTRiG5 жыл бұрын
Performing the challenge you're set on a game show is not "showing off".
@Edward-qe8xg5 жыл бұрын
@@qwertyTRiG He kinda made it more complicated, he could have done (100/50) to get a 2 and divide the 1626 by that but he knew that by multiplying by 50 then dividing by 100, he'd get the same answer, kinda impressive but the long numbers were unnecessary.
@Ashley197213 жыл бұрын
@@qwertyTRiG It's very clever, but you can't tell me that he's not trying to impress Carol. It's showing off, they both know it and are enjoying it.
@bradevans78823 жыл бұрын
Even my calculator struggled
@labradormcgraw4 жыл бұрын
Rachel Riley is so much better at the maths than Carol Vorderman ever was - she wouldn't have had to take his word for it.
@donnas1013 жыл бұрын
Come on, Don't dis the vordmeister, national treasure. I'm kidding by the way.
@ck8673 жыл бұрын
I’d agree with this - I mean, they’re both exceptional, but I think Rachel would have seen exactly where he was going with adding the one, whereas Carol seemed to have genuine disbelief at the move.
@shaun2k248 ай бұрын
Or, she didn't interrupt after he did the hard work
@NPA1001 Жыл бұрын
Two words… Fucking Hell! 👏👏👏👏👏
@CancelRevival Жыл бұрын
This guy is a phony. When he had 1626, he knew that all he had to do was divide 100 by 50 to get 2, then divide 1626 by 2 to get the answer. But he decided to go the long way just to look good to people who didn't realize. James Martin in 1997 is the real one.
@dylanpritchard49818 жыл бұрын
I remember watching this show with my Grandad when I visited England growing up.