Too good video lecture sir thank you so much uploaded this video lecture sir
@atharali6682 Жыл бұрын
My daughter loves ur lectures
@Ayush-mw2up3 жыл бұрын
Ye wala video bhi bahut he shandar tha ♥️♥️♥️🙏 concept clear
@poojaadvocate29582 жыл бұрын
Nice explain
@VikramJms4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Paji Maine apka video pura dekha apke bahut easily define kiya sare rules ko bilkul aam bhasa me Again thank you Keep it up uploading
@digvijaysinghgarg60252 жыл бұрын
Best is always best 😇💯
@My_lyf993 жыл бұрын
Thankuu sir
@Ajay_Legal Жыл бұрын
👍
@Okila_Babu_2 жыл бұрын
Sir your short live examples are the best for proper understanding ..
@himani62552 жыл бұрын
Best class😄
@umairshafiquemughal82094 жыл бұрын
Excellent Explanation 👌👌
@advsukhisidhu13214 жыл бұрын
Thnx sir u are great god bless u
@manishaverma65673 жыл бұрын
Very nice 🙏
@karamsingh42794 жыл бұрын
Good lecture
@mritunjaykumarmisra23603 ай бұрын
Sir please make videos on new crpc , evidence and ipc 🙏🙏🙏
@advb.21584 жыл бұрын
Sir penalty sirf custody officer te lggegi??ya jo mukhia village ta us uppr v penalty lgg skdi a??
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Under which rule
@advb.21584 жыл бұрын
In video 9:40 pr jo topic chl reha g custody wala
@advb.21584 жыл бұрын
Rule 43A sir..
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Who is in custody of that property is responsible to bring it before court.
@Priyankayadav-dt7iy4 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@pallavimore56764 жыл бұрын
Bahot ache sir Thanq much ....sir .i m from maharashtra i cdnot understand sec 9A Maharashtra amendment ...plz make short vidio for that if possible... Thanq so much
@blabberbaba54392 жыл бұрын
@Pallavi More lj.maharashtra.gov.in/Site/Upload/Acts/Code%20of%20Civil%20Procedure%20(Mah%20amendment)%202018.pdf
@advb.21584 жыл бұрын
Sir je company ya 3rd person court ch profit den di jaghaa judgment debtor nu hi pay krde fr..company ya 3rd personte legal action houga??
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
If the court has ordered 3 person to deposit in court and if violation is made by 3rd person, the it's a contempt of the court order
@200vaibhav14 жыл бұрын
sir in the lecture on sec 73 we came to know that if a mortgage debt is there it be first satisfied, but in order 21 rule 46, mortgage debt can also be attached, & according to order 21 rule 18 & 19 cross claims do not apply to mortgage suits. then how a claim for rateable distribution is satisfied? what will be remedy of mortgagee in this regard? if mortgage is attached as debt? will mortgage remain unsatisfied? what about ratable distribution? what about cross claims? please clarify
@tanuujshah26154 жыл бұрын
thank you so much sir could you please do uttarakhand land laws please
@harpreetsinghkahlon28274 жыл бұрын
Will do at the end
@tanuujshah26154 жыл бұрын
Harpreet Singh Kahlon thank you so much sir 🙏🏻🙏🏻
@rahulvaswani61243 жыл бұрын
Sir order 21,Rule 43 me kitna time lagta hai execution aane me.