Softing LinkXpert M3 First Impressions & Comparison

[@stratixmedia]

We have a LinkRunner at1000 (Fluke Version) and just got our LinkXpert in the mail. We were hoping to have the same functionality as the at1000 with a few extra features. We are not an installer and our primary usage for our at1000 is the switch port application. Most of our OT networks do not use DHCP so the inability to pull the switch port and VLAN information without being on the network essentially makes the LinkXpert useless for us.

[@unrealed2211]

I run an Small IT company and was looking into getting this unit as an upgrade to the net prowler i have been using. Trying to see if the extra features are worth the cost.

[@oetken007]

If you can not hear a tone near the cable is a good thing. That means, the shielding is working. I think the Softing tester is way too slow. Not seeing which wire is broken is also not great. The length measurement.... Wireless test are way better with an Android app.... Thank you for showing.

[@christianirmler3011]

Your Platinum Tool Qualifier looks exactly like the Softing NX1400 thatr we use for years. I Think it is the exact same thing.

[@ComputerProMedia]

I think so too. I wonder if it's just licensed out and white labeled. It's not a bad unit, a bit slow though (The P Tools one), I'm guessing the other would be the same. The Softing NetXpert XG looks interesting though.

[@kolozarg]

Hi, The 1.41 firmware has been released. Please update it and also try to measure the short UTP cable with it. Maybe they have fixed the bug and you have a more accurate measurement. Please try it because I am interested. Thanks

[@AK-IT]

is the Fluke DSX 5000 or 8000 better of a certifier than the Etherscope nXG or the WireXpert 500?

[@ComputerProMedia]

I haven't played with the WireXpert 500 yet, but the Etherscope NXG isn't a certifier, it's a troubleshooting tool. Fluke DSX/Versiv and Ideal LanTEK are the popular goto certifiers today.

[@JasonsLabVideos]

Don't forget, the case thats on the M3 isn't included. It's seperate. Also those tone wands are VERY fragile, they are not built to take any abuse at all.

[@ComputerProMedia]

Good point and thanks for pointing that out. The unit we tested just had the outer case on it, which seemed like a nice addition without adding too much bulk. Most toner probes feel inferior to quality units like the Fluke or Harris. What did you think of the tester unit itself?

[@JasonsLabVideos]

@@ComputerProMedia It does some neat things but needs alot of work to fix alot of bugs. I have one and the fiber scope.