CPU Design philosophy: Gigahertz war

  Рет қаралды 4,631

The Ultimate Computer Scientist

The Ultimate Computer Scientist

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 11
@TheDtownpiston
@TheDtownpiston 6 жыл бұрын
I would love to see a video strictly on bulldozer and why it failed.
@DigBipper188
@DigBipper188 6 жыл бұрын
Same here.
@thudtheace
@thudtheace Жыл бұрын
Bulldozer was built around highly threaded application model, not single to low thread application model (which were the prevalent threading model at the time), and it failed. But as a server processor, it scaled quiet well, especially for VM's.
@admiralmyxtar3702
@admiralmyxtar3702 5 жыл бұрын
After watching this video I've come to a thought: Pentium 4's architecture looks so flawed at fundamental levels, that I have a hard time believing it was a mistake. Probably a very carefully planned way to increase clock speeds to the Moon and make an illusion of a fast CPU in the eyes of average Joe. Having CPU stall and wait for main memory does increase stable clock speeds - just compare the same CPU in AIDA64's FPU and memory stress tests. Both load CPU by 100%, yet first case can almost double the power consumption of first. And it worked sadly, and bribes to OEMs to not use superior Athlons just sealed the deal and pushed AMD tens of percents of market share behind.
@niewazneniewazne1890
@niewazneniewazne1890 10 ай бұрын
Remember they've had in plans Pentium 5 Tejas/Jayhawk. "50 stage pipeline", "Slated to operate at 7Ghz", "Tejas went even further ahead with this paradigm, with Intel targeting 10GHz clock speeds by 2011".
@vyor8837
@vyor8837 6 жыл бұрын
AMD should have updated K10 again.
@vyor8837
@vyor8837 10 ай бұрын
@@niewazneniewazne1890 he worked on infinity fabric and an ARM chip they never released.
@AlexSeesing
@AlexSeesing 6 жыл бұрын
Robot! And you are right Sir. Now, if you would, can I add to this how Bulldozer finally scales well in modern games?
@Luredreier
@Luredreier 6 жыл бұрын
4:41 AMD just use "SMT" as their term. Why invent the wheel? And saying that they where behind... Eh, debatable. Bulldozer and Piledriver used a hybrid SMT tech in their Bulldozer and Piledriver processors after all.
@nelsonandrade375
@nelsonandrade375 6 жыл бұрын
graph shown at 1.22 is wrong, amd was first to 1ghz. If you consider demos then ibm reached it in 97 with an experimental chip. Intel was only able to take back the crown with the p4 northwood, the p4 williamette with its rambus couldnt compete with amd using ddr ram.
@TrueMathSquare
@TrueMathSquare 6 жыл бұрын
Decent, Interesting, and yet confusing video cause you didn't really go into detail.
Advanced CPU Designs: Crash Course Computer Science #9
12:23
CrashCourse
Рет қаралды 943 М.
Правильный подход к детям
00:18
Beatrise
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Каха и дочка
00:28
К-Media
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
Why did slot CPUs exist?
58:44
Tales of Weird Stuff
Рет қаралды 71 М.
why not use one Instruction set?
12:47
The Ultimate Computer Scientist
Рет қаралды 3,9 М.
How a CPU Works
20:42
In One Lesson
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Why Majora's Mask's Blue Dog Took 25 Years to Win the Race
21:04
Vidya James
Рет қаралды 2,5 МЛН
The Very Best of Intel's Worst - $1000 Pentium D Extreme 965
14:31
Fully Buffered
Рет қаралды 34 М.
6 Horribly Common PCB Design Mistakes
10:40
Predictable Designs
Рет қаралды 229 М.
Andrew Kelley   Practical Data Oriented Design (DoD)
46:40
ChimiChanga
Рет қаралды 152 М.
Intel's biggest blunder: Itanium
10:35
RetroBytes
Рет қаралды 372 М.