Crash During Landing, Airlines Flight 5401, Avions de Transport Regional 72-212, N438AT

[@CaptainXanax]

The captain was like "This bounce will not go unpunished!"

[@dew9103]

"The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the captain’s failure to execute proper techniques to recover from the bounced landings and his subsequent failure to execute a go-around"

[@googaagoogaa12345678]

great fedex style landing (ahem) how the hell does it go from a routine landing with proper touchdown to this in less than a minute wow

[@YlmazDALKIRANscallion]

- My aircraft. - Your aircraft. These professional pilots...

[@FlyingDreaming]

Just curious, why this particular part caught your attention? Sorry for stupid question..

[@YlmazDALKIRANscallion]

@@FlyingDreaming Because there is no teamwork in cockpit.

[@FlyingDreaming]

@@YlmazDALKIRANscallion Apologies, I did not articulate my question properly. What exactly is wrong with "my aircarft - your aircraft"? I am missing how this particular item shows lack of teamwork..

[@YlmazDALKIRANscallion]

@@FlyingDreaming Because the aircraft doesn't belong to them. There is an ego problem in the cockpit.

[@FlyingDreaming]

@@YlmazDALKIRANscallion Oh I see. Thank you. I would suggest to you that captain meant "I have control" with first officer acknowledging "You have control". This is 'Positive transfer of aircraft control' occurrence, which is an element of crew resource management.

[@Turner9090]

Should have gone around when control was given to the captain

[@DrWhom]

when you take over you don't really know how bad it is...

[@gerardmoran9560]

Go-around! Set up for another approach and maintain Vapp.

[@4406bbldb]

I flew alittle and just don't understand some of these failures. Tragedy.

[@Halberdin]

Final report reports.aviation-safety.net/2004/20040509-0_AT72_N438AT.pdf aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20040509-0 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Airlines#Incidents_and_accidents

[@laurachance-lablanc3119]

Okay try making moving traffic to the side instead of sand

[@AnthonyPappagallo-g1h]

You dont enter a port with propulsion p t obl e ms and no tug bo as ts

[@rfi-cryptolab4251]

I would have been on the go exactly at the 40 second mark.

[@gaguy1967]

I think youre going too slow at that point and youre in the air...youre coming down no matter what

[@DrWhom]

@@gaguy1967 yeah an unstablised takeoff is risky as well, there is a 50/50 point where both are equally risky

[@HiddenWindshield]

@@DrWhom There's no such thing as an "unstabilised takeoff". Going around would have been *by far* the safer option at any point before the wing actually touched the ground. The only possible excuse for not doing so is that they just happened to have a dual engine failure or some other major control issue.

[@WarblesOnALot]

G'day, Bumps-A-Daisy..., not so much a Landing, as an Arrival ; in that following an actual Landing the Flying-Machine remains servicable, and fit for further use... This performance appeared about to Cartwheel, and rip a Wing off, but that's merely a matter of A Pinion... ;-p Ciao !

[@beardedbarnstormer9577]

was this a training flight? lol

[@FLo-jc7ig]

SO WHAT WAS THE OUTCOME??? GEEZ!!?

[@adammcdonald3632]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/bIHLdWxofb2VZqs

[@themuffinbg516]

Bro why they are this dumb???? when the plane do this the first thing that i would do is go around