Critique of Pure Reason | Immanuel Kant

Resource and further reading: amzn.to/3xKwtUZ
Watch all my chaotic media edits with concise analyses: • MORPH ANGELS | 1ST WAVE
🔍 Topics Covered:
The Limits of Human Knowledge
Phenomena vs. Noumena
The Role of Cognitive Categories
Synthetic A Priori Knowledge
Kant's Copernican Revolution in Philosophy
The Dialectic of Reason
Aesthetic Dimensions in Knowledge
#ImmanuelKant #CritiqueOfPureReason #Philosophy #HumanCognition #Metaphysics #Epistemology #PhilosophicalInquiry #TranscendentalLogic #PhilosophyExplained

[@Premiseandconclusion]

Very ambitious! Summary of critique of pure reason in 9 minutes!

[@MorphAngelsYT]

I had to re-upload this video because I received a copyright strike on the music I used, despite having the proper license. I apologize for any comments that were deleted along with the original video.

[@semferdumplings]

ah the enemy of all creators “copyright strike”

[@dethkon]

Haha owned

[@HimanshuSharma-oy9ss]

Your understanding and articulation of Kant's book is praise worthy. It's precise.

[@philosophemes]

This may be helpful: “The transcendental idealist, on the contrary, can be an empirical realist…” (Critique of Pure Reason, A 370).

[@PetiteDimanche]

Dude I saw the thumbnail and clicked immediately. Very eye-catching. I knew it would be good❤❤❤

[@damin1916]

One of the most mind blowing works of philosophy ever created, great video!

[@dylankren8046]

Great video. I don’t know about the assertion that the a priori conditions of experience are fairly described as revolutionary. Maybe they had been forgotten. But let’s not confuse their remembrance with some new theory.

[@jameslabs1]

Wonderful. Thanks

[@Ibnsina4425]

Good video...knowledgeable... Simple explantion.. Keep it bro

[@SyrianBugBro]

Wow....this is so well done and thought out. Keep up the good work.

[@marshallodom1388]

That means me, or I am not who I think I am. I am what other people perceive me to be, just ask them and they'll tell you. And probably alot more of it is more accurate than any opinion I might have about who I am.

[@alexandrianautocruiser8024]

Amazing introduction, thank you.

[@HowardGeoff]

This was a wonderfully put together video, keep it up!

[@nev-bq8fh]

Awesome vid !

[@VantasChannel]

Beautiful editing

[@eyesontheinside5776]

thank you so much

[@danlhendl]

I don’t see things as they are? Some wont see anything at all

[@sophiashakti5638]

Yep, you see through the lense of your world-VIEW. Until pain, hunger, imminent death hit you 😂😂

[@badgerbusiness9059]

Wish we could have tripped Kant out on a Hero's dose and then see what he'd have had to say.

[@Rachel-vx8se]

If reality is formed by our mind why are there things we can’t change no matter how hard we try?

[@MorphAngelsYT]

based on this video according to kant on crituque of pure reason, our mind shapes how we perceive reality (phenomena), but it doesn't mean we can change reality itself. the mind organizes our experiences into understandable patterns, but it can't alter the underlying "things-in-themselves" (noumena) that exist independently of our perception. so even though our perception of the world is influenced by our mental structures, the actual things we encounter remain unchanged by our wishes or efforts. actually, you can understand the whole video just by reading the thumbnail. "You don't see things as they are, you see things as you are."

[@Premiseandconclusion]

It’s like a pair of sunglasses that filter everything seen through the eyes by dimming the light. The mind is like the pair of sunglasses, except a lot more complex. All our sense experience is placed in an ordered way by the mind.

[@RC-qf3mp]

Kant was wrong. Heidegger and McDowell are right. We perceive things, for the most part and primarily, the way they are. Distortions and mistakes can happen. They are exceptions that prove the rule.

[@Alan-ne9vu]

I can see where you're coming from but I actually think that Kant was right, for the most part atleast. Our understanding of reality is definitely tainted by our past experiences, attitudes and "point of view" (from which angle and to what extent we perceive different situations or things). That is why each person has a different reaction to the same things.

[@RC-qf3mp]

@@Alan-ne9vu people having different reactions to same things has nothing to do with this. Heidegger and McDowell both drew heavily from Kant by learning his lessons but rejecting what Kant got wrong (the dastardly Ding-an-Sich). The trick is to get rid of the Ding-an-Sich without lapsing into transcendental realism or empirical idealism. Kant didn’t understand perception or the body or language.

[@HimanshuSharma-oy9ss]

Some unexplained phenomena summon reason, which exposes the noumena of that occurence (the phenomenon at consideration). Eg. We can't see sub atomic particles or xrays but our reason and experimental enquiry revealed the existence of a host of such sub atomic particles and EM radiation. It's interesting how matter (senses) can not itself perceive 'the manifestations of other material things' (i.e phenomena) , but at the same time it can give rise to an abstract entity (consciousness, reason, thinking, etc.) which can grasp the scientific underpinnings of these manifestations. It sort of demands the presence of either a dualistic nature of matter, or presence of matter + something abstract that complements matter (soul or consciousness).

[@RTMaalGurJaR]

❤

[@NDAsDontCoverIllegalActs]

By design it seems

[@michaelvandenheuvel317]

So you can get away with it.

[@markmulligan571]

The conscience of good and evil, shared by 95% of humanity, is the Kantian categorical imperative. It is also the Christian Holy Ghost, left to us by Christ as a Comforter pending His Return to bring us back to Paradise. It is discriminating and self-actualizing; we don't need to figure out its justification or mechanics; merely obey it. To assist us in this task, we have the universal prayer Our Father, that Christ taught us. Assuming obedience to these simple and categorical imperatives, neither we as individuals nor our governments need do anything else, study anything else, obey anything else.