Robespierre: I have in my hand a list of people to be sent to the Guillotine and many of YOU are on this list, but I'm not telling who yet. What do you think of that Guy in the assembly: I think we should send Robespierre to the Guillotine first. All in favor? *Everyone's hand goes up* Robespierre: OooooOooh NoooOooo!
@alsaif33865 жыл бұрын
Part of oversimplified
@mbalce62205 жыл бұрын
Oversimplified haha
@mdtalhaansari10965 жыл бұрын
A bit oversimplified, don't you think?
@holyromanempireball4655 жыл бұрын
To the guillotine!
@aleksandarvil57185 жыл бұрын
*_There's a tax for that!_*
@tabinekoman4 жыл бұрын
Imagine being peasant far in deep of village and hear about the news. Constantly "WTF is happening in Paris."
@cpt.shmitt73874 жыл бұрын
Sounds a little like America right now.
@samyrandome4254 жыл бұрын
I feel like that's pretty much always the sentiment of the rest of France lol
@gunnerr84764 жыл бұрын
There were so many revolts caused by difference factions I think the respond is "WTF is happening with this country".
@maxwellpeter17384 жыл бұрын
Like today's america
@sergeacaf34113 жыл бұрын
Hahahahaha
@theproplady Жыл бұрын
If you watch the movie "The Death of Stalin", you'll see many parallels between Robespierre's downfall in this film and the downfall of Lavrenty Beria. Beria made the same mistake where he said he had dirt on everyone and threatened to take them all down, forcing his fellow officials to gang up on him.
@britishnerd391911 ай бұрын
Except IRL it's unlikely beria actually told presidium he had dirt on them. They just knew that, but also all basically hated Beria
@deanpd340211 ай бұрын
@@britishnerd3919 He was an easy man to hate.
@falconeshield11 ай бұрын
@@deanpd3402When you can't keep your hands to yourself eventually they'll get cut off
@annedejong104010 ай бұрын
It was a mess, Staln Beria, you mean Trotski and Lenin is a different matter
@Jamietheroadrunner10 ай бұрын
Same with Joseph Goebbels. Same with Joseph McCarthy. It’s right out of the fascist playbook 😄
@MusicGamesEverything5 жыл бұрын
When they were all screaming "Tyrant!" as the subtitles said, they were actually screaming "Death to the Tyrant"
@hagamapama4 жыл бұрын
Mort tyrant? That's what they were crying?
@stfu_cameron4 жыл бұрын
hagamapama “Mort au tyrant” yep
@nkt08114 жыл бұрын
Napoleon: “Hold my wine”
@Reagan19844 жыл бұрын
@@nkt0811 Robespierre's tyranny was much worse than Napoleon's
@ConstantineJoseph4 жыл бұрын
Napoleon strove for law and order and he kept his anti opposition tactics down to a minimal. However his stunning successes on the battlefield, his sheer popularity, charisma and lowly initial status in life really endeared him to many French as they put their lives down in battle for him and for the nation. He was not only a brilliant commander, but also a brave soldier, literally leading from the front at Siege of Toulon against ferocious British grapeshot fire from cannons. He was utterly exposed at the bridge of Arcole in his Italian campaign. His ADC literally flung himself at Napoleon to save him from volleys of Austrian musket fire in the thick of the combat situation, just opposite of the bridge. It is such inconspicuous gallantry in the face of his own troops, his fellow Frenchmen, that he gained impeccable status and inspirational leadership. Not since Alexander the Great do we see a national commander, leading with such gusto, with innovative and driven approach to defeat world class standing armies in lightning campaigns, using meager resources on his own end. Napoleon wasn't any of those opportunist, lower talented individuals in the revolutionaries of the Cordeliers club, Jacobins or Girondinists. Those were men who desired power and seized the opportune and used their own voice to create an uproar. Napoleon was a well trained, hard working, genius military commander who studied and studied countless military tactics, like Frederick the Great, before he showed his masterclass in strategy and tactics at the Siege at Toulon. So he was a real battlefield genius and everyone trusted him because he could convince and plan a masterstroke before his superiors and they always consider his plans capable of ensuring success in the battlefield. His actions, saved the revolution from foreign annexation and invasion. Amongst all the French, he rose to power on merit as well as luck.
@DarkArtistKaiser2 жыл бұрын
I love the face he makes at 4:06. You can see it in his eyes he just realized hes completely lost control.
@STho205 Жыл бұрын
This Revolution was a series of people instigating its phases losing control. It started as a Bourgeois political spat, but the mob was rallied to aid the cause with violence, then the Bourgeois lost control of the mob, then Robspierre played a Cromwell character, took control after the Mars massacre and turned paranoid tyrant then the military took control...to be r ruled by Directorate which itself was overthrown in 1799 and by 1804 the general that overthew the directorate made himself Emperor.
@TheNapster153 Жыл бұрын
@@STho205It really was the definition of a path to hell made with good intentions.
@falconeshield11 ай бұрын
@@TheNapster153And it was all in 2 years
@MD-ep6ot2 ай бұрын
@@TheNapster153 I do not believe in good intentions and spontaneity. On the contrary, I think that this terrible adventure is the long-matured fruit of a plot whose scope still eludes us today, of a premeditated criminal sedition. The writer Cazotte, who had belonged to the French Illuminists, made one evening, at a dinner, this prophecy whose realization must, obviously, involve an element of coincidence, but which was also, above all, like those of Cagliostro, and without any possible doubt, advance information. He said to the guests who were greatly amused by it, three or four years before 1789: "You, Monsieur Bailly, and you, Monsieur de Malesherbes, you will die on the scaffold... You, Madame, you will be taken in a cart, your hands tied behind your back, to the place of execution. - But, Monsieur le prophète, the Duchess of Grammont replied laughingly, will you not at least leave me a confessor? - No, Madame, no, Cazotte replied enigmatically, no, you will not have one, and the last person to be tortured who will have one will be the king!... " What we know in any case with certainty is that a congress of universal Freemasonry was held in Wilhemsbad in 1781. The Count of Virieu, on whom the Illuminists had believed they could count, and who had been part of the French delegation, returned completely terrified and declared that he was leaving the sect, saying to the Baron of Gilliers: "I will not reveal to you what happened; what I can only tell you is that all this is much more serious than you think. The conspiracy that is being hatched is so well-planned that it will be virtually impossible for the Monarchy and the Church to escape it.
@NightWanderer31415Ай бұрын
@@STho205 this really is a perfect description of the process.
@theproplady9 жыл бұрын
Well, THAT escalated quickly....
@MrDjahh5 жыл бұрын
they have been waiting to catch him for a while at this point, he had been spreading terror around france
@robinjenny55724 жыл бұрын
Welcome in France my guy!
@lethanhlam34344 жыл бұрын
Robbespiere government has fallen down just in one night
@Conn30Mtenor4 жыл бұрын
Not quickly enough.
@adge51824 жыл бұрын
True
@ramblinbob19185 жыл бұрын
1st rule of being a successful tyrant, accuse some and let everyone turn against them to save themselves. Do not accuse everyone or leave everyone open to accusation at once, they'll have no where to turn except against you.
@alessiodelcastillo16135 жыл бұрын
Stalin would like a word with you
@agostinomazzocca19785 жыл бұрын
Robespierre did this sort of accusation because he thought that, by scaring everyone with those threats, maybe some of them would have joined him and maybe even sold some of the members of the Commission to avoid the purge. Bad choice indeed. You should announce a purge when you already have enough supporters. If you don't make clear who's going to die, people will not know how big are their chances of surviving the purge and, instead of risking, they will choose to save themselves.
@autismobinch1355 жыл бұрын
Ramblin' Bob Rob was a principled man
@mercenery12325 жыл бұрын
Anyone remembered Saddam Hussein's and his brilliant purge? By the end some were praising as akin to a god haha
@ssrmy17825 жыл бұрын
@@alessiodelcastillo1613 OP was right. Stalin was poisoned by Beria. Even Stalin fucked ut up, but he did better than most in the tyrant game.
@HansenDing3 жыл бұрын
One of the interesting details in this is the bells that rang as Robespierre fled to the hotel de ville. During those years these bells were a call that the commune needed support and for the working class sections of Paris and the National Guard to mobilise and pressure the National Convention. In all cases prior to this the masses gathered was great enough that the Convention saw that the people were with the commune, not them, and they basically bow to the will of the commune. However, during this the fall of Robespierre, famously the bells rang again but only 13 of the 48 sections of Paris mobilised. The numbers of communards and national guards units you saw there defending the Hotel de Ville was a fraction of what they were before. And that was how you could tell that the people had at this point largely deserted Robespierre. Or else the convention would have never been able to arrest them.
@machida582 жыл бұрын
Revolutionary power is both a function of numbers and guns.
@joshuafeng46302 жыл бұрын
somethins similar happened in Hebert's case months before I believe? He couldn't get enough supporters to rebel. I personally think it's not only about if they got deserted by the people, but also that most of the people were growing tired of revolution and didnt want to actively take part in it anymore. It's understandible considering the situation after the fall of Girondins didn't get much better and the war
@HansenDing2 жыл бұрын
@@joshuafeng4630 absolutely, I think keyword is active, actively support or defend. Like the Bolsheviks didnt have close to the majority of Russia behind them, but the Provisional govt was so unpopular and lacked literally an iota of support that nobody was willing to actively defend it, and the Bolsehviks had an active supporter base.
@jam8539 Жыл бұрын
@@HansenDing That and when the civil war was in progress at that point the whites, were little more than war lords, aristocrats and old Tsarist generals, the bolsheviks however, bad where seen as a better alternative for most
@tomservo5347 Жыл бұрын
Is that a young Napoleon sent by the Convention to arrest Robespierre?
@sigma_frenchie40753 жыл бұрын
I am actually impressed by the talent of this actor. very well played
@Vatras8883 жыл бұрын
fact that he is polish and franch is not his native language is preaty impresive
@JSheridanEntilZha3 жыл бұрын
He was a great theater actor of the Comédie Française. His version of Molière Dom Juan was and I think is still a milestone
@zmoresperros20073 жыл бұрын
Andrzej Seweryn. Polish. Still performing in cinema, tv, and theatre (he is also director of a theatre in Warsaw).
@alessandrocaboni58822 жыл бұрын
D'accord.
@andrefava1028 Жыл бұрын
@@JSheridanEntilZha he also played in the movie The Maharabatha,with Victor Mezzogiorno and other actors who played in La Révolution Française
@Yomi20124 жыл бұрын
Robespierre is seen going through severe stress and panic attack, you See how his voice is cracking. He is literally going through an anxiety meltdown.
@steveshapiro3263 жыл бұрын
No doubt the stress was horrible and Robespierre had been ill. Had he not been killed, illnesses would have done the job.
@Androids233 жыл бұрын
No he had tuberculosis and it got worse at that time, he was too weak to defend himself, they show him coughing on his cloth
@D.y.8912 жыл бұрын
@@Androids23 pues la maldad se paga como dicen
@steveshapiro326 Жыл бұрын
@@Androids23 Back then, everybody was sick. Robespierre did have a good doctor (Souberbielle). That doctor's photograph can be Googled. He was real old (taken in the 1830s).
@ajasilikonreffkmimmon Жыл бұрын
Robespierre has a Smallpox in his left cheek.
@laboulaie4 жыл бұрын
C'est magnifique , les décors et les costumes , vraiment d'époque ! Félicitation au costumier et à l' historien !
@steveshapiro3263 жыл бұрын
Je suis tout a fait d'accord.
@Angeli282 жыл бұрын
Oui!
@jessicaq41452 жыл бұрын
Magnifique ecriture!
@sophieortiz50302 жыл бұрын
Je n'aime que ses lunettes qui sont assez stylées
@clem842 жыл бұрын
A l’historien ? Je ne crois pas…
@Sajangrg693 жыл бұрын
He basically signed his death warrant with that speech. Not naming the names on his 'blacklist' was a final nail in the coffin since people in the Committe of Public Safety and the civilians (who loved Danton) was already turning against him and they were watching carefully Robespierre's every move. However, there's guys like Bertrand Barère who was also responsible for causing reign of terror yet, managed to survive through the french revolution and died old.
@elangelyt77382 жыл бұрын
Clearly you know history. You can believe what you want, because there is no way to prove what is right or wrong but, I personally believe Robespierre was about to denounce people like Barère or Billaud-Varenne. Who were the original creators of the terror. Billaud-Varenne proposed the law of 14 of Frimaire, in which power was concentrated in the committee of public safety. And Barère was since the beginning on the committee of public safety. Like you said Robespierre mistake was not to mention their names, I'm sure if he had mention Barère or Billaud-Varenne, or people like Fuche, others would not have moved a rock to save them.
@fawziekefli22732 жыл бұрын
Committee of Public Safety = C.O.P.S. Make of that what you will. 😁
@kenoliver8913 Жыл бұрын
@@fawziekefli2273 Except it would be CdSP in French
@MaximilienRobespierre-kw4rt Жыл бұрын
I made a very big mistake
@curtrupp4259 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely Danton while not perfect was a true French hero in many eyes possibly Max was jealous
@mariemorgan77593 жыл бұрын
I am so glad of the subtitles in English or Spanish so I can watch this and understand what they are saying. Also helps me to practice in my French language studies!
@yoursoulessmate3 жыл бұрын
Look into the comments there are some lines that got mistranslated
@oliviervillaret16742 жыл бұрын
Rosetta Stone French ! The best method to date
@johnpages46272 жыл бұрын
je réponds il faut apprendre le français c'est la plus BELLE langue du MONDE !
@JonatasAdoM Жыл бұрын
Subtitles! That's how I learned English.
@fifervonpiper67075 жыл бұрын
"When you sent thousands to the guillotine so hard that you sent yourself as well." ~ Maximilian Robespierre
@boshirahmed2 жыл бұрын
Think about it murderer killing innocent people and their wives and saying he believes in equality, all his decisions were based solely on gaining and keeping power and nothing else, he even killed his friends..
@yoyomx29322 жыл бұрын
He never said that
@darrowdapper96592 жыл бұрын
He did, it’s in the History Channel
@yoyomx29322 жыл бұрын
@@darrowdapper9659 Where did he say it? What is History Channel?
@darrowdapper96592 жыл бұрын
@@yoyomx2932 he say it in the radio and better check out history channel they gots nice alien babezzz
@doyleperkins49163 жыл бұрын
The long haired associate is St Just, who, by all accounts, was so heartless, emotionless and enigmatic that some contemporaries compared him with a "well-chiselled face of cold, hard marble..." He died on the guillotine the same day as his master, Maximilien Robespierre.
@cam2762 жыл бұрын
That's a recitation of the most cartoonish and crudest parts of the old reactionary propaganda. Fictional, like most of the script of this movie. The Thermidorian version of this period and its gross lies and fake anecdotes (staged in this mediocre movie) have been largely debunked and refuted by the modern historiographical research. The struggle for an egalitarian society is still very much current. In France, the solidarity and equity system (the logical continuation of the successive revolutions and obtained by long popular struggles) is currently threatened like never before since the end of WW2 and the beginning of the fifth republic by the neoliberal and greedy oligarchy (or rather their servants) in charge. We would really need a Saint-Just right now. And above all we would really need a popular insurrection.
@steveshapiro326 Жыл бұрын
I believe St. Just had served some time in prison for stealing from his mother.
@annyjoseph6162 Жыл бұрын
"L ' Archange de la Terreur"...He was 24...
@vincentlefebvre9255 Жыл бұрын
St-Just said "No freedom to the ennemies of liberty."
@anneclaffey2843 Жыл бұрын
@@steveshapiro326 Wtf? 😮
@rekilu26406 жыл бұрын
you could make a religion out of th- no don't
@alessiodelcastillo16135 жыл бұрын
I don’t get this
@RandomPerson-jo7cw5 жыл бұрын
@@alessiodelcastillo1613 Cult of the Supreme Being
@imabdella5545 жыл бұрын
Too late
@TMthe33rd5 жыл бұрын
@@alessiodelcastillo1613 it's a reference to a youtube video titled "History of the world" by Bill Wurtz
@alessiodelcastillo16135 жыл бұрын
SaltyBoi UWU ooooh link?
@xornxenophon36525 жыл бұрын
People claim that I ursurped the French crown, but it is not true! I found it in the gutter! (Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of the French)
@Danko_Sekulic5 жыл бұрын
People who accuse Napoleon of "destroying the republic" apparently have some kind of selective amnesia. Max and his loons had done that years before!
@shuaguin54465 жыл бұрын
@@Danko_Sekulic Well the other reason why Napoleon is seen a the butcher of the Republic is the constitution of secret police during his reign. Republican sympatizers and activistes were hunted, emprisonned or execute in france, Italia and other part of the empire.This political police prooved to be damn effective and french republican took a hard hit during his reign. Restauration monarch would inherit this political police but it lacked the popular support and the loyalty towards the regim to operate efficiently for them.
@1987AnimeBoy5 жыл бұрын
Cao Cao may have said a similar thing.
@gungdegalang46355 жыл бұрын
Waterloo?
@apalahartisebuahnama76844 жыл бұрын
The whole point of the Revolution is to deposed the monarch, yet several years later they have a new one under much better man, and they love him
@SomePerson_Online5 жыл бұрын
“Robspiere has arrived” Them: *exits the room fast af* 🤣
@Lilemma20064 жыл бұрын
SomePerson Online ikr
@sergeacaf34113 жыл бұрын
Èwwwwwqw2qqwwewwwwwwwwqqwqqqqqqqq
@ziadahmad24403 жыл бұрын
fast as fuck boi
@aceharris14635 жыл бұрын
During the debate on whether to grant King Louis a jury trial and the presumption of innocence, the greatest anti-monarchist and opponent of the hereditary right in the history of the English language, Thomas Paine, spoke in defence of the principal, regardless of the fact he despised the monarchical institution. He tried to ensure that France would be born in true liberty and equality. Robspierre opposed him. And soon after, Robespierre met the end he crafted for himself.
@zhouwu5 жыл бұрын
By whatever judgement you judge, you shall be judged. -Jesus.
@willsteele7935 жыл бұрын
Excellent post. I never thought of that. In fact the decision on how to handle the trial of the king was probably the moral and ethical turning point of the revolution. Turning back could only happen with bloodshed.
@Trebor743 жыл бұрын
Considering the English had a trial and execution of Charles 1 in 1649. The path had already been trod.
@foundationofBritain3 жыл бұрын
@@Trebor74 The English learnt from the mistakes of the civil war and commonwealth, which is why the Glorious Revolution succeeded in re-establishing historic English liberty's and the historic English principal of English Limited Monarchy, of which the modern form that they created is now know as Constitutional Monarchy, which still exists to this day, which then gave rise to Parliamentary Democracy, which also still exists. And long may that continue.
@2msvalkyrie5293 жыл бұрын
Yes. Thomas Paine should be remembered by Citizens of US UK and France !! He stood for liberty , justice and dignity for all ( incl slaves ) and made some of greatest speeches in History !
@wouters11 Жыл бұрын
Interesting fact: the best parts of Robespierre were played by great polish actors: here Andrzej Seweryn and in the movie "Danton" Wojciech Pszoniak. Masterpiece.
@zonesquestiloveunderworld11 ай бұрын
One of the greatest historical films ever... which makes it one of the greatest _films_ ever! Depardieu's most riveting performance too, in a career absolutely brimming with such performances.
@falconeshield11 ай бұрын
@@zonesquestiloveunderworldWhere is Depardieu I can't see him
@benisrood11 ай бұрын
Are you Polish, yourself?
@wouters1111 ай бұрын
@@benisrood yes, i'm
@majuli84202 жыл бұрын
The guy grabbing him when Robespierre tries to sit down actually yells "Get back! These are the seats of honest men that you murdered!"
@zmoresperros20073 жыл бұрын
Robespierre is played here by a very prominent Polish actor, Andrzej Seweryn. He is also member of Comedie Francaise.
@RaoulLeDegueu14 күн бұрын
it was the movie Danton
@kube4106 күн бұрын
THATS AMAZING!!. Im polish and i thought i recognized him lmao. He played Prince Jarema Wiśniowiecki in With Fire and Sword movie adaptation. Jarema is kind of known as a polish vlad the impaler for his approach to dealing with the cossack uprising. Andrzej Seweryn is very good at playing bloodthirsty executioners it seems lol
@adamlis93213 жыл бұрын
2:57 That guy behind Saint-Just made me crack in laughter. Because his face, in a few seconds, says volumes. Like "You DO have names in this massive conspiracy theory of yours, right?"
@ВладимирКруглов-к9о3 жыл бұрын
Loool. And look what severe disappointment has lead to!
@chrisbaple2 жыл бұрын
lmao he was rlly waiting for him to pull out the receipts
@lawrencebittke84785 жыл бұрын
French politics was real rough back then. The momentum was swinging the other way; and The Terror was now consuming its own perpetrators. Robespierre’s enemies could sense it and could smell blood.
@schusterlehrling3 ай бұрын
Even his former supporters could smell the fear of blood in their own necks. That's why he fell.
@nicolaspithon50422 ай бұрын
La révolution française s'est saignée elle-même.
@johnmccarron70663 жыл бұрын
Excellent job on the actor's part when he responds to the accusations of tyrant. That's the point when he realizes the danger he is now in.
@steveshapiro3263 жыл бұрын
Robespierre should have stayed home that day.
@davidromeira895811 ай бұрын
@@steveshapiro326😂😂😂yah
@jean-jacquescortes9500Ай бұрын
Et pendant ce temps, un jeune officier artilleur venu de sa Corse natale, attendait son heure. 😜
@Ares99999 Жыл бұрын
"All those in favor raise their hand." I love how you see some people raising their hand quickly, while other did it slowly or reluctantly. Although they called it a vote, nobody would vote against, since that would probably doom oneself.
@kelvindoang1228 Жыл бұрын
This is the same as now political party, the follower will follow the leader and raise hand when ordered
@JonatasAdoM Жыл бұрын
@@kelvindoang1228 Yeah. I was seeing the result of a vote the other day and was appalled. You had some parties where everybody voted exactly the same. The worst is that for the politicians, not doing so is an act of treason.
@Uryendel Жыл бұрын
Actually it's the opposite, voting in favor would be a death sentence if Robespierre would have keep the power, this period isn't called the terror for nothing.
@Shogo50008 жыл бұрын
If I can help... 3:45 "Let my attackers prepare their poison" (ciguë = hemlock) 3:52 "Why go on living where truth and lies are undivided" ... not "invisible"
@GeneralSunsprite5 жыл бұрын
“Indivisible”
@Toghebon5 жыл бұрын
And inbetween "I shall drink it upon these sacred seats"
@UlissesQuirino5 жыл бұрын
4:02 Death to the tyrant!
@12321dantheman Жыл бұрын
also 2.22 "greed and fear" not "grief and fear"
@belanissart76213 жыл бұрын
Le meilleur film historique auquel j’ai pu assister de toute ma vie de Français.Les acteurs formidables ,chacun jouant son rôle parfaitement ,remarquablement, m’ont permis d’assister en spectateur d un événement que je pouvais toucher de ma main, ils me frôlaient.Bravo j’ai vécu cette Révolution et cette 1 ère Constitution qui me permettra d’être un Français libre.merci
@Leebpascal14 жыл бұрын
7:16 He actually says : : "A bit of courage" (show some guts) "And to your health, bastards !" (Cheers, bastards) "Align yourselves" (get in ranks) "To the barricade" "And (long) live the republic"
@lorenzorenzulli2395 Жыл бұрын
And at 8:43 he say « Come back here ! Bunch of chickens, bastards ! » « Roughnecks ! Shitty soldiers » (I’m not sure about this one « soldats de merde ») « Scum ! Come back cowards ! »
@AbstractSloth5 жыл бұрын
Truly, cancel culture has gone too far
@stvdagger80745 жыл бұрын
Just give thanks that the SJWs don't have guillotines yet
@AbstractSloth5 жыл бұрын
@@stvdagger8074 Man, that would be cool
@agba50984 жыл бұрын
@@stvdagger8074 They have digital guillotine aka Twitter.
@TMthe33rd4 жыл бұрын
@@AbstractSloth yeah that's cool indeed Until you lose your head
@tabinekoman4 жыл бұрын
Your having neck priviledge is canceled.
@Dfathurr5 жыл бұрын
Certainly the bald man at 4:06 is one of the bravest. He said Robesipierre is a tyrant right next to him
@washizukanorico5 жыл бұрын
Dfathurr if you watch the entire movie you realize this bald guy was one of Danton best buddy, at that point he probably hated Robespierre pretty badly ... still take corones to call him a tyrant right next to him ... I mean if he doesn’t die on this you probably will ...
@cypherbrittainnethegodofsl49885 жыл бұрын
That's Louis Legendre, Danton's best friend. He hate Robespierre for killing Danton
@Kelly14UK4 жыл бұрын
There's another bald man who died though. They looked similiar.
@subashgrg46663 жыл бұрын
Why did he kill his friend Danton?
@bernhardwall68763 жыл бұрын
I think I also heard the word "lâche (coward)."
@CEB18963 жыл бұрын
When Robespierre is asked to give them the names, he looks at Saint-Just for a moment: “Should mention him to save myself?” And Saint-Just looks like he’s afraid Robespierre will do so.
@alessandrocaboni58823 жыл бұрын
C'est vrai.
@altinaykor36411 ай бұрын
that's such a messed up take! I thought in that moment he was like "crap, I wasn't expecting them to demand names, what should I do now?!" And Saint-Just have that expression, because he, just like Robespierre didn't thought about this part and was just expecting them to be afraid enough to shut up
@falconeshield11 ай бұрын
For a brief moment it definitely crossed his mind
@revolutionariesoffreedom237411 ай бұрын
no cuz saint just was more radical than rbespierre. At least rbespierre had a more sensitive approach towards others than saint just. Tho rbespierre had the title of incorruptible
@tomservo53475 жыл бұрын
I love these old historical films-I remember the one's from the 80's shown here in the States and this one looks to be late 80's, anniversary of the French Revolution. They simply don't make them anymore.
@Rilez6165 жыл бұрын
And the ones they do make are over dramatised, these ones are perfect
@Account.for.Comment4 жыл бұрын
@@BannedIP I was expecting another sjw ruinned everything comment. Thankfully, someone understood. Hollywood and most productions felt the need to dumb down because they had no belief in the audience capacity for intelligence. Appealing to sjws are just appealing to dumb down philosophies, nothing more.
@rafik8663 жыл бұрын
@@Account.for.Comment so we have the books left 😉
@710LENNY3 жыл бұрын
This was a multi national multi part production commemorating the 200th anniversary of the French Revolution. The actors were chosen from around the world. There used to be a clean english language copy of all the parts on youtube, but I can't find it anymore. And at one point Amazon did have a listing for the whole shebang. Sadly, the French didn't really respond well (read, at all) so it just seemed to fizzle out and disappear. Pity. It was hours and hours of pure joyful entertainment, even if you did know what was going to happen.
@tomservo53473 жыл бұрын
@@710LENNY Back in the old days when we had 5 channels to choose from networks used to invest quite a bit into mini-series. Learn French I guess lol.
@elnationalista4 жыл бұрын
Robespierre: I am not a tyrant! Also Robespierre: Shut down all press and anyone against me!
@rafik8663 жыл бұрын
That's right, but in the same time needless to say that all was mess and chaos everywhere in the coutry
@subashgrg46663 жыл бұрын
The man wanted to guillotine everyone who oppose him. That's pretty much how dictators operate
@jeandarwin91433 жыл бұрын
@@subashgrg4666 frankly you haven't read anything on Robespierre, did you ? Oversimplified isn't a source. The "Tyrant Robespierre" archetype was created by his opposition to put dirt on his legacy. Just remember that the ones who arrested him were the likes of Fouché, who literally wanted to genocide a whole city with cannons.
@Augustuscaesar713 жыл бұрын
@@jeandarwin9143 The good citizen Robespierre just killed 40,000 people in the guillhotine.
@jeandarwin91433 жыл бұрын
@@Augustuscaesar71 you should actually read books instead of literally following the propaganda created by thermidorians -----> "Robespierre, la fabrication d'un monstre" by Jean-Clément Martin (a historian speicalised on the guy) is very enlightening, unfortunately it is in french.
@BFVK4 жыл бұрын
"Bastards" translated as "Citizen" "Long live the Republic" translated as "That's an order" LOL
@TheStewieOne3 жыл бұрын
I love even the soldiers are abandoning Robespierre. "Fuck this! I ain't getting paid enough to guard this asshole."
@GrandAdmThrawn3 жыл бұрын
It's such an underrated movie. For me it's a strong 10/10.
@paolosyt5 күн бұрын
Cinematographic beauty... the horses, clothes, expressions, beautiful
@vozurna2 жыл бұрын
one of the best acting performances ever, by all the cast
@heliedecastanet1882 Жыл бұрын
The whole movie is incredible 🙂
@maureengillies9495 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely incredible acting I felt I was there
@ReaverLordTonus Жыл бұрын
For anyone who's a fan of Aaron Sorkin. This was a Ten Word Answer moment. Robespierre basically said "members of this government are traitors and I know who." A bold claim, but he didn't have the next Ten Words to back it up. He had no names, in his mind it was pretty much anyone who opposed him for any reason and everyone saw right through it. We see alot of this today too, members of congress standing and making a bold claim about their opposition but when pressed to prove it or provide a solution for it, they have nothing.
@Archedgar Жыл бұрын
Yep. Same thing hitler, stalin & the U.S. democrat party. Typical leftist orthodoxy; Tyranny & corruption aka socialism. Glad robespierre was brutally tortured & executed along with his comrades. Though even that was too good for him.
@zenferg Жыл бұрын
Same thing that did in Joe McCarthy and the Red Scare.
@Archedgar Жыл бұрын
@@zenferg Senator McCarthy's anti-hitler efforts were noble. Only guys that are pro-hitler, aka socialists, would say otherwise.
@lray1948 Жыл бұрын
@@Archedgar You need to go back and study your history. Socialists were not at all pro-Hitler. Hitler went out of his way to aid Franco in Spain in his attempt to overthrow the elected socialist government there.. And as far as McCarthy being anti-Hitler, after WWII... McCarthy attacked the war crimes trials the Allies held for German war criminals. He said it was pure vengeance. It should be noted there were a lot of fairly recent German immigrants in his state of Wisconsin who were not anxious to punish Germans for events in the war. As far as Hitler's attitude towards the socialists, he hated them. He considered them as next-door to Communists as objects of hatred. Only Jews and Communists were worse in Hitler's eyes. There were many German socialists in the death camps.
@tomcarl802111 ай бұрын
@@zenfergJoe McCarthy was right all along. The KGB Venona files proved him right.
@delavalmilker5 жыл бұрын
Romanian dictator Ceausescu also had his "Robespierre moment".
@Gg-qx3vo5 жыл бұрын
What exactly happened to him?
@remenir975 жыл бұрын
Aryan got shot.
@Gg-qx3vo5 жыл бұрын
@@remenir97 I know he got executed but how did he get ousted from power?
@firstone32895 жыл бұрын
@@Gg-qx3vo he made a public speech that went wrong
@gunnerr84765 жыл бұрын
He made a speech, not just that but trying to create a reform amidst a rebellion. People just can't stop booing him and he went to seek shelter. The rest you know.
@jolorulz8 жыл бұрын
I love this film, but I wish they had shown a more detailed version of this particular scene, in which the first speaker was supposed to be Saint Just who was shouted down before Robespierre had to take up his defense. IDK, i'm just being picky I guess.
@poi2lkj3mnb5 жыл бұрын
I really wish they had added Robespierre's last words in the convention. "Danton that is what you regret? Cowards why did you not defend him."
@joellaz98365 жыл бұрын
poi2lkj3mnb That would make a great bit of dialogue! Why didn’t they add that?
@kevinmeyer64274 жыл бұрын
They actually squished 7 & 8 Thermidor together, Robespierre came back the next day to supposedly name names, but never got the chance. Some think Saint-Just was going to make some attempt at reconciliation (a bit out of character for him, IMO), but he also was shouted down. I'm curious who is supposeed to be who in these scenes, who is Fouche & who is Barras?
@rias.gremoryyy3 жыл бұрын
@- navis - I just pity Louis XVI.. he barely had any time to defend himself..and he was pretty chill compared to other kings of his times
@ВладимирКруглов-к9о3 жыл бұрын
@@rias.gremoryyy Agree. Louis actually seems to be a decent and well-meaning king plagued by the hard times and bad luck France had to endure. He certainly was much better than all those who gain power after his downfall.
@Pfsif5 жыл бұрын
From Hero to zero real quick.
@overcomerbtboj Жыл бұрын
Lol 😂
@emilycupcakegirl3674 жыл бұрын
No one: Robespierre: *Wears sunglasses before they were even invented*
@DSCH44 жыл бұрын
"The reflected light of my own brilliance is overwhelming." - Robespierre, probably
@thunderbird19213 жыл бұрын
That humorous inaccuracy aside, this scene alone shows why Robespierre was so dangerous. Very sly with his words, and yet extremely cunning in terms of seeking power. By refusing to say names, he was essentially asserting the right to condemn and execute any of them. No wonder people cheered when he was finally guillotined.
@kristofantal88013 жыл бұрын
Sunglasses existed back than. It is accurate. Look at contemporary sources.
@chourineur92503 жыл бұрын
Et ta connerie...tu l'as inventé ou c'est de naissance?
@steveshapiro3263 жыл бұрын
@@kristofantal8801 Robespierre wore glasses all his life. Spectacles existed since the Middle Ages. I think John Wilkes Booth wore sunglasses.
@markjohnson94554 жыл бұрын
I like watching movies in their original language and having it translated to English because I appreciate the differences.
@angelgomez84094 жыл бұрын
Robespierre was going to send many MORE to the guillotine. *This angered the French people, who punished him severely*
@SKVLE3 жыл бұрын
I got this reference😉
@michaelmontagu39793 жыл бұрын
You might say that he let his power go to his head
@MarcinKrn Жыл бұрын
In this French film (1989), Robespierre was played by a Pole, Andrzej Seweryn. In turn, six years earlier (1983), in the Polish-French film Danton (director Andrzej Wajda), Wojciech Pszoniak played Robespierre. There, Seweryn also played (Bourdon), and Danton was played by Depardieu. To make it interesting, both actors Seweryn and Pszoniak) knew each other well and often played together (e.g. in "The Promised Land" by Wajda). It follows that Poles are suitable for playing the role of Robespierre. 🤣
@MajorDenisBloodnok Жыл бұрын
Andrzej Seweryn did a great job as Robespierre (fun fact: if he spoke a very good French, Seweryn was dubbed by the wonderful French theater actor Gérard Desarthe, who also dubbed Wojciech Pszoniak as Robespierre in Danton). Seweryn is a great actor, one of the few non francophone actors being hired by the Comédie Française, the oldest and most prestigious French theater company. You can find on KZbin Seweryn remarkable performance in Molière's play Dom Juan.
@v4wlu322 Жыл бұрын
4:24 watching robespierre having a mental breakdown is somehow funny
@darkman70092 ай бұрын
I almost felt sympthy of him having mental breakdown, but knowing not just he's a dictator, but also failed dictator after that error' careless speech, i just laugh at him
@huldrrrr94863 жыл бұрын
Everything else aside, I kind of love Robespierre's blue jacket and sunglasses. Its a Look
@ВладимирКруглов-к9о3 жыл бұрын
Yes, quite cool. Ripe for resurrection!
@patcoghlan38525 жыл бұрын
Yeah if you are going to pull the "I have in my hand here a list of names..." and then not tell who the names are, after previously executing most of your friends and allies, then you better have armed guards nearby or be ready to launch a coup, otherwise they will gang up.
@Tyrunner00974 жыл бұрын
It was clear that his intention was to turn them all against one another, so he could then be able to get rid of anyone he felt was not loyal to him (He would say "the Republic", but we know better), then take control of the others, and the government, more easily.
@emrecck11 ай бұрын
@@Tyrunner0097kinda like internal “divide and conquer” strategy…
@Tyrunner009711 ай бұрын
@@emrecck AKA The Long Knives
@inga-riot3243 жыл бұрын
Robesbierre: Doesn't give the names France: That's where your'e wrong kiddo
@infonomics4 жыл бұрын
Angry vengeful crowd: "The blood of Danton chokes you Robespierre." Robespierre: "Now it is time for my Jesse Owens' impression." Couthon: "Me too."
@chrisstorey4197 Жыл бұрын
Those words helped Robespierre recover his voice as he spat back, "so it's Danton that bothers you. Cowards! Why didn't you defend him?" Which was fair enough. Even Legrande, who spoke the words, had undergone his Simon Peter moment and backed off defending Danton to save his neck after Danton's his arrest. I don't know why they cut it. It was a very telling moment.
@andiearyabima64993 жыл бұрын
He is just like superman in Injustice. He was such an idealist to the point that if his family caught stealing a bread because of starving, he wouldn't hesitate to cut of his brothers hand. He fight for justice and liberty but in the end he act like he is the only one who know best and everybody must listen to him. That my friend, is the first step of being tyrant.
@anneclaffey2843 Жыл бұрын
I don't think Robespierre favoured Sharia law, in all fairness 😮
@andiearyabima6499 Жыл бұрын
@@anneclaffey2843 He was against religion, Catholic Church back in the day, let alone sharia law. He was upholding the idea of logic and reasons above all.
@anneclaffey2843 Жыл бұрын
@@andiearyabima6499 I know. That's one of the reasons why I admire him so much ❤. As an Irish person, I'm only too aware of the damage 💔 the Catholic Church has inflicted over the years.
@chillmemes5865 Жыл бұрын
@@anneclaffey2843So you want to murder the clergy?
@anneclaffey2843 Жыл бұрын
@@chillmemes5865 Who said anything about murdering clergy? Do me the courtesy of READING what I wrote. And find out something about the rôle of the Catholic Church in Ireland.
@Shintigercurl4 жыл бұрын
it's so interesting to see the fall of a would-be dictator. you almost see the moment where it all goes wrong for him.
@BS-rm1hv3 жыл бұрын
A dictator ?
@mahfoudseraf5995 Жыл бұрын
@@BS-rm1hv yes, is there a problem with what he said?
@BS-rm1hv Жыл бұрын
@@mahfoudseraf5995 He was the member of a collective, not a dictator.
@NightWanderer3141511 ай бұрын
@@BS-rm1hvbut quickly becoming too powerful, and power corrupts.
@kshitijsrivastava64404 ай бұрын
Casting for Robespierre is ON POINT uncanny resemblance right there
@AGMundy Жыл бұрын
Splendid. I have long been fascinated by Robespierre. On balance I am of the opinion that he was a well-intentioned man who was overwhelmed by the times with the Revolution devouring her own children. Ironically of course he was opposed to the death penalty. It is interesting to see (and read) how power so quickly easily falls away from people. I well recall the downfall of the Communist Eastern Bloc countries and in particular the fall of Nicolas Ceausescu.
@BilalAhmad-ff3xq11 ай бұрын
I would recommend studying 'the man of history' phenomenon.
@luisfilipe92724 жыл бұрын
Personnage intriguant de l'histoire. Une période absolument extraordinaire.
@Ash-vm3ut3 жыл бұрын
période de conflit et magouille d'aristrocrate égoiste , vachement une bonne période c'est même la pire période qui a causé la perte de celle-ci , la france s'en sortait largement mieux à l'époque des rois
@christophelallau29152 жыл бұрын
Une période propice aux aventuriers de toutes sortes. Je descends de 2 agents révolutionnaires...🤨
@qenyaithandrill78483 ай бұрын
@@LockheedFan C'est pour ça que le "petit peuple" était largement divisé tout au long de l'histoire post-révolution autour de la figure des monarches... Et qu'on se retrouve, 150 ans plus tard avec la Ve République, à devoir élire un "ROI" pour 7 ans (puis 5) parce que le pays est ingouvernable si on tente une vraie démocratie. La vraie démocratie ne peut PAS fonctionner en France. La république française s'est taillée dans le sang, et à l'encontre TOTAL des idées des Lumières. Mais ça, la propagande Républicaine l'a définitivement enterré.
@leonoliber620112 жыл бұрын
Le coeur me crève en voyant cette scène horrible. Vous avez publié ce petit extrait du film le 9 thermidor de cette année - merci pour la commémoration. Je pleurerai éternellement ces héros de l´humanité.
@democracyisnon-negociable38193 жыл бұрын
Tg traître de la liberté si tu supportes un hero qui est devenu un zero alors tu es un zéro aussi
@karlmichaelcarvajal48105 жыл бұрын
French is truly a beautiful language
@timholder6825Ай бұрын
Love the look on his face when he realises the games up and what the likely consequences are going to be.
@tunasandwich8049 Жыл бұрын
That moment Robespierre remembered why the French revolution happened in the first place
@iwanegerstrom4564 Жыл бұрын
While Robespierre might have had good intentions from the beginning (I dont think so, but I give him the benefit of the doubt) he quickly became what so many Kings, Emperors and other men of power in history have experienced. Mad with power...
@altinaykor36411 ай бұрын
and delusional read one of Josephine's letters which she sent during her imprisonment (for the crime of being wife of someone which these people didn't like and executed) read how she describes the prison, how people are treated there and what exactly happened to her body which made her unable to have more children (Dark) no need to mention the kind of life was outside of that prison in Paris with all of those executions and don't even get me started on Vendee genocide and the fact that they even wanted to go as far changing Lyon's name! imagine one of the leaders of your country's government calls all of this chaos and messes, a glorious republic which is also lawful and virtue🤣like don't you want to punch the guy in the face when he says that?🤣🤣🤣
@ВладимирКруглов-к9о5 ай бұрын
@@altinaykor364 Blueprint for all "progressist" tyrannies ever since.
@cqtaylor6 жыл бұрын
Well. Tough crowd.
@revan62284 жыл бұрын
C'est le sang de Danton qui t'étouffe il t'étouffe j'adore cette phrase lorsqu'il dit ça
@pedroroquehidalgo70218 жыл бұрын
No imaginó que después, mucho tiempo después, para él, todo seguiría tan confuso como en ese preciso instante en que sus ojos abiertos a rabiar trataban de capturar una brizna de luz en la que apoyar su mirada, su voz desgarrada dejó de resonar en sus oídos, envuelto en aromas de sándalo y jazmín ausentes, su paladar intentaba recordar las caricias del vino joven afrutado inundando su lengua al ritmo de las yemas de sus dedos sobre teclas de marfil, ingrávido, impotente, aterrado. Sólo el desvanecer del tiempo le llevó a olvidar sus sentidos, inmerso en el bellísimo resplandor azul de un fino cordón de plata.
@ddbrady37876 жыл бұрын
@04:00 the Deputies are not shouting "Tyrant." They are shouting "Death to Tyrants." Kind of a big difference.
@welshpete123 жыл бұрын
This is very well done , it is almost like being there as it happens !
@tirantloblanch1Ай бұрын
3:26 there is a guy screaming "nombre,nombre" an infiltrate spanish jaja
@Albiliuss5 күн бұрын
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
@ssrmy1782 Жыл бұрын
If I could go back in time to witness any event, I would go back to see Robespierre & Saint Just on the guillotine
@cds99015 жыл бұрын
The subtitles are completely drunk
@Skadi6095 жыл бұрын
Pas faux. À 2:34, le terme cupidité est traduit par "grief"(le chagrin, la douleur) alors qu'il aurait dû être traduit par "greed"(avidité, cupidité, avarice...). Sans parler des passages non traduits, mais on peut saluer l'effort😌
@CoffeeSuccubus5 жыл бұрын
@@Skadi609 English?
@yarpen265 жыл бұрын
@@CoffeeSuccubus He said that the word for greed was translated into grief, also plenty of content was left untranslated at all.
@Skadi6095 жыл бұрын
@@yarpen26 Thanks🙏. PS: I am she😉
@Skadi6095 жыл бұрын
@@CoffeeSuccubus Roughly translated: "At 2:34[Actually 2:23], the term "cupidité" is translated as "grief" (sorrow, pain) when it should have been translated as greed(cupidity, avarice) . Not to mention untranslated passages, but we can applaud the effort. " Hope that clarifies everything 🙂
@ErickHumboldtАй бұрын
be aware that Robespierre is the extreme left in France
@0tuc3 жыл бұрын
As many times I have watched this, I still wonder if Robespierre left his glasses on that podium.
@ВладимирКруглов-к9о3 жыл бұрын
He did actually, yes.
@asgaiyawaya3973 Жыл бұрын
I would like to think that the last thing that passed through Robespierre's head, other than that bullet and much later the guillatine, was maybe he went a little too far. Of course it wasn't a little but not the point. Ultimately he dug his own grave and got what he deserved.
@luger66666616 күн бұрын
FYI, the subtitles for the guy on the horse ( 7:15 to 7:33 ) are totally wrong. Here is what he says : 7:18 : "A bit of courage !" 7:23 : "Cheers, bastards !" 7:26 : "Get dressed !" 7:28 : "To the barricade !" 7:32 : "And long live the Republic !"
@pistashioman9935 жыл бұрын
The sound Of the wheelchair at 1:00
@paulvanatoru51644 жыл бұрын
Eternă amintire pentru poporul francez care a schimbat istoria lumii !!!
@markrdavis53684 жыл бұрын
It is very interesting that during this period of tyranny in 1794 it was Danton on April 4th and the Robespierre and Saint Just and Coulthon on July 28th 1794. Beheaded and then heads raised to the people by Sansons crew. There must of been plenty of Head raising back the. Eugene Wiedman in 1939 and Christopher Lee was there who witnessed when he was 17. The public beheading and head raising. I believe the guillotine was last used in 1977 and abolished in 1981. Only Saudi Arabia is known for Public beheadings till this day. They are still head raising there.
@reximingan94205 жыл бұрын
Even the army hates Robiesppiere, shots were fired for thinking their fighting but its a faint and when the cannons turned towards the hotel, the real fighting begins.
@florjanbrudar6925 ай бұрын
Hôtel de Ville is the city hall of Paris.
@jamespatillo3742 Жыл бұрын
The theatrics in this scene are amazing
@alexcorvuscazador559613 күн бұрын
Napoleon watching from the background with his men and cannons "WTF is going on?, guess I'll wait a bit more".
@nickcara973 жыл бұрын
“The blood of Danton chokes you.”
@AKDGsonic6 жыл бұрын
well, I hear Vive la nation, the translation is vive le Robespierre, excellent
@acidedeoxybonucleique68524 жыл бұрын
(Vive Robespierre) Pas "le"
@CEB18963 жыл бұрын
The speaker of the convention, the person that said “I demand to know the names”, was himself responsible for the execution of 2000 individuals in a Lyon. He was later sent to French Guyana as punishment and died.
@bradwinter253 жыл бұрын
I disagree the head of the convention laggarre a friend of Danton he stayed in paris
@bradwinter253 жыл бұрын
That's lagrende
@bradwinter253 жыл бұрын
I know he was a friend of Danton after reading books and he was not sent to an island that's the man who was the head of the convention I believe three of the ones on the committee were sent to that penal colony
@CEB18963 жыл бұрын
@@bradwinter25 I’m referring to Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois. He was the president of the national convention when this happened.
@boshirahmed2 жыл бұрын
@@CEB1896 they are all murdered since they all knew the fake charges, they only wanted power, the king and queen were innocent of the charges..there was no legal reason to kill them.
@tangocash73045 жыл бұрын
I think Robespierre left his glasses behind. Not that he'll be needing them later.
@BattleAxe1345 Жыл бұрын
Nothing would instill my confidence and moral more than seeing my commander shouting about orders in a drunken state.
@ВладимирКруглов-к9о5 ай бұрын
kek
@mediocreman632311 күн бұрын
The moment when they turned the cannon around…
@ConstantineJoseph9 жыл бұрын
Robespierre felt that his every word is like the word from God himself to the convention. He seems to not have mastered the art of staying cool or expecting a bad response with those shouts. In reality, he was stunned and speechless during that shout down. Well given the modern day politician, people like McCain, Hillary Clinton, Cameron, Putin or Like my country Lee Kuan Yew, their skin is so thick that they would shout back at you and call you a fraud or traitor and threaten arrest. The modern dictator is far worse than Robespierre who is a moral and upright human being himself. Although his decision making is not good and was wrong in some respects. But everyone can tell he was sincere about his work and that he does mean what he say and really believe in what he says. The modern leader is nothing but scum Machiavellian who could talk all day about something but behind close doors they're doing the entire opposite.
@anilomd6 жыл бұрын
Constantine Joseph Interesting viewpoint.. I think the figure of Robespierre is fascinating.
@Kelly14UK6 жыл бұрын
Constantine Joseph Your comment has an intelligence incisively put i understand and actually envy.
@Kelly14UK6 жыл бұрын
anilomd Put it this way. The French Revolution and Napoleon are the most amazing pieces of history 1789 to 1821. Plus Damiens 1757.
@raf2216 жыл бұрын
In reality, Robespierre did his speech fully, the assembly was ready to take down Robespierre. When Saint Just has wanted to speak, they cutted him. The speech of Saint just was saying to stop the killings. The ennemies of Robespierre were rich people and didnt like Robespierre because he gave French universal vote, a maximum price of bread and other laws to protect the poor. Robespierre was resigned and didn't want to fight anymore. His ennemies orchestrated the Terror and killed many innocents to blame it on Robespierre. After the death of Robespierre, the vote of the rich was promulgated, the law of the maximum abrogated, and a new government was set in place, week and undemocratic. Then Napoleon took all. Robespierre said it in this final speech."Laissez flotter un moment les rênes de la révolution, vous verrez le despotisme militaire s'en emparer" or "Let the reins of the revolution float for a moment, you will see military despotism seize it" He knew it the day before his death.
@OfficialRapMV6 жыл бұрын
Don't you smear the name of Lee Kuan Yew. Traitor!
@mitonaarea58564 ай бұрын
00:35 is this Robert de Niro???
@banjiu102 жыл бұрын
Who is the general on horse at 5:53? Is it François Hanriot? He is also executed together with Robespierre in Part 2.
@viniciusmotta132 жыл бұрын
yep, thats him
@dude2499 Жыл бұрын
Robespierre: I have a list of traitors in our midst! Everyone: Who are they? Robespierre: …..that’s not important right now
@darkman70092 ай бұрын
What i don't understand was robespierre really had the list of names, or he just bluffing? Also if he reveal the names list what would happen?
@willday93164 жыл бұрын
Goscinny and Gotlib speculated that if Robespierre was alive in the 1960s, his favorite tv show would have been The Untouchables.
@yolainebouteiller243826 күн бұрын
Robespierre ...et le goût du sang... Finalement on récolte toujours ce que l'on sème 😂😂😂
@HundreadD5 жыл бұрын
This scene in the Convention very cleverly parallels the one earlier in the movie when the Girondins were all rounded up and arrested, especially with the whole "des noms" thing. A nice piece of directing for this movie, shame the rest of it isn't exactly up to this standard, but only decent
@ElderNerwal10 жыл бұрын
Ce passage sur le 9 Thermidor semble à la fois manquer d'exactitude historique et de profondeur dramatique. Fusionner ainsi les événements du 8 et du 9 Thermidor laisse à penser que la mise en accusation de Robespierre fut un mouvement d'indignation spontanée devant ses accusations volontairement vagues; or rien ne saurait être plus éloignée de la vérité. En choisissant de focaliser exclusivement sur les destins de Danton et Robespierre, le film perd la pluralité et la complexité qui font la caractéristique principale de la Révolution Française; ici, où sont l'attitude théâtrale de Tallien à la tribune pour sauver la femme qu'il aime, le silence énigmatique de Saint-Just, les huées qui accueillirent Collot et Billaud aux Jacobins, les intrigues sourdes et frénétiques de Fouché pour sauver sa tête, la solidarité désespérée de Le Bas et Augustin Robespierre, les ambiguïtés de Barère ? Par soucis de simplifier, le rôle du club des Jacobins et de la Commune de Paris sont gommés plus que de raison tout au long du film; et on garde l'impression que la résistance de Robespierre n'était que de principe, alors qu'en vérité l'incertitude était grande jusque tard dans la nuit du 9 au 10; Robespierre ne manquait pas de soutiens, mais ils ont été mal utilisés.
@Stalysfa10 жыл бұрын
Je suppose que le réalisateur avait la même vision de la révolution que moi. Peut être que tu n'es pas d'accord avec moi (et c'est tout à fait ton droit), mais la révolution est selon moi libérale jusqu'à ce que les montagnards volent la révolution pour en faire le bain de sang que l'on connait. Robespierre est pour moi l'un de ces destructeurs de la bonne révolution. Je sais que beaucoup de personnes défendent Robespierre et l'histoire n'est pas toujours une science exacte. Alors il est normal de ne pas être d'accord, mais je pense profondément que Robespierre était un homme terriblement mauvais et qu'il a contribué à détruire tout ce que les premiers révolutionnaires avaient mis en place. Pour "défendre" la république, il a instigué, ou au moins participé, le meurtre de milliers de personnes parce qu'ils pensaient différemment. Pour en revenir au film, je suppose que le réalisateur avait une très mauvais opinion de Robespierre. Et peut-être que ça l'a influencé dans la réalisation du film. Je ne vois pas vraiment d'autres explications.
@theomazan59359 жыл бұрын
Stalysfa Vous ne connaissez rien de Robespierre, l'homme et sa vie. Comment peut-on oser écrire de telles inepties ? Il a participé au meurtre de milliers de personnes "parce qu'elles pensaient différemment", dites-vous ? Où, quand ? Seuls les tribunaux révolutionnaires, les commissions populaires et les juridictions militaires étaient habilités à condamner quelqu'un à mort. Or Robespierre n'était membre d'aucune de ces institutions. Aussi, contrairement à votre mensonge, celles-ci ne condamnaient pas pour des délits d'opinions, mais pour des actes de rébellion ou de haute trahison contre une jeune démocratie en danger de mort. Les morts n'étaient que de la racaille, des félons, des assassins, des royalistes, pris les armes à la main. La Terreur, c'est un régime mis en place pour défendre les Droits de l'Homme face à tout ces monstres. J'en veux pour preuve, de l'avis même du Président de Comité de Sûreté Générale, Vadier, on ne trouvait pas un accusé sur quatre-vingt que l'on envoyait au Tribunal Révolutionnaire qui ne soit pas un traître. Robespierre, l'incorruptible, était le meilleur des hommes, l'héraut de la démocratie, le champion des droits du genre humain. Lisez ses discours, ils sont sublimes ; ils portent l'espoir à tous les malheureux et la crainte à tous les persécuteurs. Je me fais gloire d'honorer la mémoire de ce génie, de le défendre face à toutes les attaques perfides et perverses, dont la votre. Ernest
@Stalysfa9 жыл бұрын
Ernest Chabert C'est là qu'on voit la puissance de KZbin. On tente d'être poli pour exposer son point de vue et on se retrouve à être accusé d'ignorance. Je vais faire court, vous savez très probablement que les tribunaux révolutionnaires étaient aux mains du gouvernement, lui même, aux mains de Robespierre et sa clique. je doute que Hebert ou encore Desmoulins étaient des traîtres...
@theomazan59359 жыл бұрын
Stalysfa Le Tribunal Révolutionnaire était une juridiction nécessaire pour apporter dans le cœur de tous les ennemis du peuple la terreur afin de les neutraliser, le temps de les confondre et de les éliminer. Hébert et Desmoulins étaient les chefs de deux factions rivales qui compromettaient l'action salutaire du gouvernement révolutionnaire ; l'une par ses excès et sa démagogie, l'autre par son modérantisme et son indulgence excessive avec les traîtres ainsi qu'avec la coalition des tyrans. Les deux étaient l'émanation d'une conspiration qui menaçait de ruiner les efforts gigantesques pour la liberté et l'indépendance de la France entrepris par la Convention et la jeune et héroïque armée républicaine. Je termine avec une de mes citations préférées de Robespierre : "Mais elle existe, je vous en atteste, âmes sensibles et pures ; elle existe, cette passion tendre, impérieuse, irrésistible, tourment et délices des cœurs magnanimes, cette horreur profonde de la tyrannie, ce zèle compatissant pour les opprimés, cet amour sacré de la patrie, cet amour plus sublime et plus saint de l'humanité, sans lequel une grande révolution n'est qu'un crime éclatant qui détruit un autre crime. Elle existe, cette ambition généreuse de fonder sur la terre la première République du monde." Magnifique et émouvant, n'est-ce pas ?
@Stalysfa9 жыл бұрын
Ernest Chabert Pas vraiment non. C'est amusant, d'abord, de constater à quel point le mot "traître" est utilisé à toutes les sauces. Il suffisait d'être un partisan de l'état de droit et du respect de la déclaration des droits de l'homme et du citoyen de 1789 pour être considéré comme un modéré donc un traître. C'est quand même fort de considérer des gens brillant comme Desmoulins être considéré comme une émanation de complotistes visant à détruire tout ce qui avait été construit alors même qu'ils étaient les instigateurs de cette révolution. Ça me fait penser au procès grotesque de Danton où il était accusé de vouloir renverser la république alors que c'était lui qui l'avait crée... En réalité, le seul crime de personnes comme Desmoulins était simplement de vouloir une république comme celle d'aujourd'hui où l'état de droit est respecté et où la justice n'est pas expéditive et truquée comme sous Robespierre. A mon humble avis, Robespierre avait deux problèmes majeurs. Le premier était qu'il avait pour ambition de vouloir apporter le bonheur au peuple alors qu'il ne le connaissait pas. Il était déconnecté du peuple, ignorait totalement toute sa nature . Son deuxième problème est, je crois, que le pouvoir l'a rendu fou. Sa politique de la terreur est selon moi révélateur d'une paranoïa. Je finirais sur une chose. Non, les moyens ne justifient pas la fin dans la plupart des cas. Tuer, massacrer, torturer des traîtres ou des gens juste suspectés de traîtrise n'est en aucun cas justifiable. Robespierre, dans sa volonté de sauver la république a détruit tout ce dont nos ancêtres s'était battus. Nous voulions la liberté, il nous a donné la terreur. Enfin, je suis un républicain, je ne peux pas imaginer une seule seconde que l'on puisse vivre sous un monarchie. Je suis athée, je n'aime pas la religion, je pense qu'on vivrait mieux sans. Cependant, je suis Vendéen, descendant de "rebelles". Mes ancêtres ont été massacrés simplement parce qu'ils voulaient défendre leur foi catholique contre une république qui voulait régir leur vie. La république a mis en place un génocide contre les vendéens. Elle a tué près de 170 000 personnes sur une population de 800 000 personnes. Robespierre était au courant à travers les rapports de l'armée et a tu cette affaire, pire, il a donné des ordres de destruction de la Vendée. On retrouve différentes notes du comité de salut public donnant l'ordre à des généraux comme Thureau de tuer tout le monde en Vendée. De détruire la région entièrement. La république a inventé tous les moyens modernes de destruction d'un peuple. Elle a mis en place des fours crématoires (fours à pain), des tanneries de peaux humaines, des noyades massives dans le "bassin national", un camp d'extermination à Noirmoutier. Ils ont même pensé à tenter de gazer la population... Bref, la révolution de 1789 était une grande et belle révolution. Celle de 1792 était un carnage qui a tout détruit. Il fallait faire la république mais autrement qu'en détruisant tout...
@CALZOLA5 жыл бұрын
At 3:48 "Why go on living where truth and lies are indivisible" (not "invisible")
@latter-daysaintbatman26794 жыл бұрын
*You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain*-Harvey Dent aka Two Face. Robespierre's case: *You either die accused by a hypocritical tyrant or you turn against the tyrannical accuser to save your own skin*
@mahfoudseraf5995 Жыл бұрын
Accused of BEING a hypocritical tyrant******
@Janon484 жыл бұрын
2:52 “I’m about to pull what’s called a pro gamer move”
@kettch777Ай бұрын
So, essentially he said that there are enemies in the Committees and the Convention, who stand against me and that he will fight. But he refuses to name them and allow them to defend themselves. He's essentially saying he is going to start arresting people and having them executed but won't say who or name specifics. A Reign of Terror. And he is announcing that essentially there are targets among the people there but not say who. Which is why they started demanding to know who and when he wouldn't say (likely because he hadn't decided yet who was the largest threats to his power,) they called him a tyrant and declared him a traitor.
@Yaguara11 жыл бұрын
C'est d'ailleurs Billaud qui rapporte cette citation de Robespierre lorsqu'il lui a proposé de sacrifier Danton : « La première fois que je dénonçai Danton au Comité, Robespierre se leva comme un furieux, en disant qu'il voyait mes intentions, que je voulais perdre les meilleurs patriotes»
@TenorMan962 жыл бұрын
3:10 When it’s dinner and the food at your table doesn’t arrive yet and you been waiting for 10 minutes