I have a friend whom soon starts their pupilage; she introduced us to basic cross. This is an addendum, and one that is rather useful. I like
@jazzvilakazi30892 жыл бұрын
Love these snippets. Best way to learn.
@advocacytutor63542 жыл бұрын
Glad you like them!
@thedalj Жыл бұрын
The defendant should have just said no to the 3rd question saying she could recollect the events. The prosection won't know where to go next. Simple defence tactic.
@Theupstateidiots3 жыл бұрын
Great videos! With all the current nonsense going on, it's nice to understand how the courtroom works and their ethics.
@advocacytutor63543 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. Glad the videos are helpful.
@LawCrimeTrialNetwork2 жыл бұрын
😆
@legalology2683 жыл бұрын
This was engaging and very well executed!
@advocacytutor63543 жыл бұрын
Thank you LEGALology.
@kimballentyne3482 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing.
@advocacytutor6354 Жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@LawCrimeTrialNetwork2 жыл бұрын
waaw that was a good one i learnt alot about it
@advocacytutor63542 жыл бұрын
I'm glad it was helpful rule of law.
@sgpappu252 жыл бұрын
Nice informative video...thanks
@advocacytutor63542 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it
@threenorns3 Жыл бұрын
Anybody else notice the dastār flip direction at the end?
@NkorerimanaNoel4 ай бұрын
Educative 🎉
@goawakeneveryone4365 Жыл бұрын
Are police allowed to make accusations during an interview?
@tre_48 ай бұрын
yes
@deborahogebule85883 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooo much for your tutorials for people like us that are from humble beginings this is the next best thing to Oxford.
@advocacytutor63543 жыл бұрын
I am so happy you find the videos useful Deborah and thank you for such a lovely comment. Best wishes.
@jessicasolomon6986 Жыл бұрын
Nice vedeos!
@advocacytutor6354 Жыл бұрын
Thank you @jessicasolomon6986
@justme-zy7br2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful video 😊
@advocacytutor63542 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it.
@gwyneth7812 Жыл бұрын
I thought the prosecutor had crutches, it was good to see them off at the end to confirm.
@advocacytutor6354 Жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@nigelduckworth44197 ай бұрын
Love the judge clapping at the end. Never happened in my court though!
@advocacytutor63547 ай бұрын
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
@BlessingIsaac-fx3pwАй бұрын
😅
@AnthonyCarrier2 жыл бұрын
Why would a defendant get on the witness stand they must have an idiot for defense council...
@advocacytutor63542 жыл бұрын
Defendants are free to accept or reject Counsel's advice.
@AnthonyCarrier2 жыл бұрын
@@advocacytutor6354 lol...
@AnthonyCarrier2 жыл бұрын
@@advocacytutor6354 Sounds like the advice of a dumptruck lawyer...
@mooondogg2 жыл бұрын
Better to put your version. She has right to remain silent but that won't help her case a her version is not available to court
@threenorns3 Жыл бұрын
It's pretty common, especially when the accused thinks they're too cool for school.
@Plastik1310 ай бұрын
That's why you should NEVER make a statement to the police when you are arrested. It is your right to keep silent. Beside that, in Quebec, and maybe in France too, it would be illegal for a judge to wear a religious sign like the indian judge in the video.
@yuppittyyippity14986 ай бұрын
A religious sign? Sikhs are forbidden from cutting their hair. The men have long hair that they grow their entire life without cutting, so they wear a turban to neatly hold it together. Would you rather that they walk in with open hair like a Pantene commercial?
@SeronuАй бұрын
You don't really have a right to silence anymore. The court can draw adverse inference from silence. S. 34 - 37 of The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
@Plastik13Ай бұрын
@@Seronu I am not talking about before the judge, I was talking about before the police.
@SeronuАй бұрын
@@Plastik13 I know but where do you think the CPS get their evidence to prosecute you from? The police. If you say nothing, the court can essentially say "He stayed silent during the police interview because there was no innocent explanation to give at the time." You can stay silent, they can't compel you to speak but they can draw adverse inference from your silence.
@Plastik13Ай бұрын
@@Seronu LOL really not. The fact that you remained silent during the police interview can not be interpreted against you, not in Canada at least.
@SreeAbhayanjaneyaSwamy2 жыл бұрын
A1
@advocacytutor63542 жыл бұрын
😀😀
@peterlovett5841 Жыл бұрын
The prosecution advocate must have an excellent geographical knowledge. She could not have known beforehand that the defendant was going to change her story from a police station to the bank yet she had the relative distances to hand. Mmm....not credible.
@highschooldropout-t6y2 күн бұрын
I just finished watching Lincoln lawyer, just a got bit influenced I must say
@Eddie-u4nАй бұрын
Why is Diane abbot doing a voice of a prosecutor 😂😂😂😂😂
@advocacytutor6354Ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@cafinallastkick66662 жыл бұрын
Great video but some questions here
@bronxer782 жыл бұрын
🤦♂️
@malokk57734 ай бұрын
Miss Lightfingers should never have talked to the police.
@advocacytutor63543 ай бұрын
🤔🤔
@SamSung-xz7jt6 ай бұрын
Bravo! Even womin with bracces and sufi muslimms can accomplis things in lief. Nevar let your handicaps stop you!
@johnhynes78912 жыл бұрын
Informative while woke and propagandist in the subliminal ....every opportunity to push the prevailing narrative.