It really should be mentioned in the video that Airbus manufacturing is based in Toulouse & anything happening out of the ordinary there is totally ordinary, it's just testing ! The airframe still has it's French registration meaning it has yet to be delivered to the customer.
@gusjones93886 сағат бұрын
Yes, looked like some tires were not turning.
@stormbob6 сағат бұрын
The fact that someone was filming and was specifically zoomed in on the wheels was the first clue.
@kimsmoke175 сағат бұрын
A Shiny new Airbus A350 registration F-WZFC, first flight November 27, 2024. Customer acceptance (4th) flight was December 13. To be registered to Delta as N526DN
@resolute13064 сағат бұрын
The owner of this site liked to be bombastic.
@nosleeppete51462 сағат бұрын
Saved my typing all this 👍🏻
@sevenam96098 сағат бұрын
Wow that Rayanair landing
@sandoralekszandrov52097 сағат бұрын
Ryanair's landings is always "wow".
@wadehiggins11147 сағат бұрын
You get what you pay for
@Anmeteor96636 сағат бұрын
There wasn't a breath of wind in Manchester that day. Ryanair just being Ryanair.
@sh2309686 сағат бұрын
Not so much of a bad landing considering that Ryan Air is a dare devil landing airline company.
@PN_485 сағат бұрын
Ryanair pilot does an amazing job landing during a storm, and YT armchair experts are all “classic Ryanair heavy landing”….🙄
@RipleySawzen3 сағат бұрын
1:10 Should I go around? +1 Point for gusty winds +2 Points for not aligning with the runway +2 Points for a near wing strike -4 Points if you are flying a Ryanair jet If you have 3 or more points, go around.
@curtisdaniel9294Сағат бұрын
To Three Minutes of Aviation: Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy and Successful New Year 😀 🎉. Thanks for your work. 💙
@starpawsy3 сағат бұрын
That Ryan landing showed some excellent flying.
@boozypixelsСағат бұрын
The last one I was gonna say, you call that verti--- ohhhh😆
@TheShowblox2 сағат бұрын
That A320 takeoff was beautiful
@stan4d19696 сағат бұрын
Jet fighter at 2:05 is a Sukhoi Su-30MKI - I had to look this up because I didn't know of a jet with twin vertical tails and canards.
@Bearmauls6 сағат бұрын
I was just about to investigate this. Thought it was a Mig-29 at first, but the canards made me think otherwise :)
@sh2309686 сағат бұрын
Looks so beautiful as if the cockpit and the fuselage are joined together in the end after getting assembled but not for each other.
@chrisridebike83 сағат бұрын
Su-30 MKM. MKI is Indian. Externally they are pretty much the same. The avionics are different.
@Marcsharp826 сағат бұрын
Ironically that Ryanair pilot has just had their softest ever landing.
@sh2309686 сағат бұрын
Rumor has that the pilot was sent for additional training hours and warned of dire consequences if any of the next 15 landings is made less smoother than this one. Welcome to Ryan Air.
@xfirehurican2 сағат бұрын
*BRAVO ZULU! Excellent set!*
@ViperAviation.8 сағат бұрын
Love these videos so much!
@deltakilo75bon618 сағат бұрын
The combination of skilled pilots and modern technology is amazing.
@RankupAviation3 сағат бұрын
Another awesome video 👌
@bobwerner69677 сағат бұрын
Zeltweg was the site of the first Austrian Grand Prix held in 1964 on a circuit laid out on the airport runways. Most of the field was wrecked with various suspension failures by the unusually hard track surface.
@cwiii3378Сағат бұрын
As a A&P tech I love this channel.
@FL24edits8 сағат бұрын
1:43 damn these brakes must've been hot 🔥
@charlestoast40513 сағат бұрын
but why didn't they use the reversers?
@FL24edits3 сағат бұрын
@@charlestoast4051 test flight
@CerberusTenshi3 сағат бұрын
@@charlestoast4051 1. It's a test for the effectiveness of the brakes. 2. Reversers have very limited functionality at low speeds.
@u2bear3772 сағат бұрын
@@CerberusTenshi > Reversers have very limited functionality at low speeds. Why is that? (except for danger of debris blown forward by reversed exhaust and sucked into the engine)
@bobo-l5v2 сағат бұрын
1:03 Ryanair had to land there & then otherwise 1 yr's salary would be deducted from captain and aircrew alike!
@David-qo7lz7 сағат бұрын
Wow! Just WOW! 👍🏻👍🏻
@robinmyman2 сағат бұрын
Ryan air pilot knew how to land in the gusting cross wind.
@ryanfrisby73896 сағат бұрын
Great video!
@UncleKennysPlace5 сағат бұрын
The weathervaning of the airplane into the wind when the wheels leave the ground is quite startling, especially in a smaller plane.
@rodmunch727818 минут бұрын
That was an awesome brake test with the Delta bird at Toulouse. Stuff like that may happen...
@antoniocanto20217 сағат бұрын
I love your videos so much
@utwoob.99267 сағат бұрын
The fact that RyanAir actually landed despite the risks says a lot about those dare devel pilots😂
@frankmoreau8847Сағат бұрын
That Delta take-off made me think of the opening sequences of Airplane.
@a-borgia49936 сағат бұрын
Delta A350 at Toulouse: testing the brakes. Not a commercial flight. Delta does not fly to Toulouse.
@skydiverclassc20315 сағат бұрын
They were all in. They had nothing Toulouse.
@curtisdaniel9294Сағат бұрын
Love Groaners ! 😅 @@skydiverclassc2031
@imusingmymomsandroid237526 минут бұрын
@@skydiverclassc2031nice one xD
@kellywilson84407 сағат бұрын
Legacy Hornets rule !
@evaluateanalysis79746 сағат бұрын
I apologise for swearing at 2:46.
@applejacks9715 сағат бұрын
Same lol!!!
@synchc4 сағат бұрын
Yup, but if the good Lord is going to forgive anything, surely this qualifies. Incredible what designers, engineers and aviators achieve in the current age.
@rosemarydickin5 сағат бұрын
Me watching the Finnish Hornet: That's not particularly vertic... HOLY SHIT!!!!
@donnabaardsen5372Сағат бұрын
Lol, me too! Whoa, wow!!!!
@DrumBum5614 сағат бұрын
In the first clip peep the A320 crabbing in for landing. Insane
@arnesw26478 сағат бұрын
Awesome!
@robertgolden1080Сағат бұрын
Nice
@kkfoto7 сағат бұрын
Plane disappears during takeoff! It will suddenly reappear after five and a half years
@Kaenguruu6 сағат бұрын
Question: Is there something similar to the categorizations for landings also for a take off? Are there "minimums" like at least x visibility?
@harryspeakup84526 сағат бұрын
As with approaches and landings there are limits which vary: for a given flight it all depends on factors like: equipment available both onboard and at the airfield; licensing status of the aircraft and the crew; national variations in legislation. Individual operators may also have their own more stringent standard operating procedures.
@pagman7983 сағат бұрын
Ryan air doesn't battle dangerous wind gusts, wind guests battle dangerous Ryan air.
@Qwertyuiop_memes108 сағат бұрын
Wow
@yeahbuddy300lbs7 сағат бұрын
Brother; dark mode when??
@matthendricks96666 сағат бұрын
As we see, Ryanair pilots need strong and gusty winds to butter a landing.
@bertinfreckmann65532 сағат бұрын
Congratulation to the Part with the perfect MS Flightsimulator Vid !🤭😁 ...´climbing through a dense layer of Fog´ 🤭😬🙄Nevertheless I always appreciate the nearly 3 min of Aviation !
@nealrasmussen48323 сағат бұрын
Why no reverse thrust instead of roasting the brakes?
@u2bear3772 сағат бұрын
a test
@odius945 сағат бұрын
foggy takeoff reminds me of the beginning of the movie Airplane!
@coolmanmaxi7 сағат бұрын
Cool
@ConfusedGoldenRetriever-yj6gi6 сағат бұрын
The foggy takeoff as well as Ryan air landing shows that Boeing and Airbus have missed the apex of the league 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@StudSupreme8 сағат бұрын
That fighter escorting the commercial flight looked like an Su-27 or variant.
@stan4d19696 сағат бұрын
Sukhoi Su-30MKI I think.
@robav8or3 сағат бұрын
Correction: The crosswind blew the Airbus PILOT off centerline.
@rossontinternet5 сағат бұрын
The Ryanair pilot was obviously on a promise from the other half
@dougaltolan30173 сағат бұрын
What fog? Oh!
@richardsoane61924 сағат бұрын
Would not say the plane was exactly blown off the runway !
@jamessimms4154 сағат бұрын
Sadly, no Aerosucre.
@siri17826 сағат бұрын
Ryanair is strong enough more than the storm,never go around 😅
@sh2309686 сағат бұрын
Go around is an expensive thing for the airline. Ryan Air is considering charging passengers the extra fuel cost if landing is aborted.
@stephenhazeldene77192 сағат бұрын
Why do they build airports where it's windy?
@u2bear3772 сағат бұрын
Why do they blow winds where airports are?
@donnabaardsen5372Сағат бұрын
@@u2bear377 😂😂😂😂
@S1L3NTG4M3R8 сағат бұрын
hi
@thomasaltruda6 сағат бұрын
1:50 someone forgot to select reverse thrust on the rejected takeoff..
@FarmerDrew7 сағат бұрын
The forbidden engine vape Running the risk of compressor stall
@ElephanthajsnenСағат бұрын
Ryanair dodgy af stay away from
@VanderlyndenJengold5 сағат бұрын
I read the F/A 18 is a very expensive plane to operate in that it costs a lot in maintenance to fly.
@VanderlyndenJengold5 сағат бұрын
hmm, don't know where i read that, just googled a comparative list of military jets /cost per hour. Still, I'm sure I read it somewhere - what do mil jet nerds say? A different opinion foe each and every one of us i reckon? 😄
@CerberusTenshi3 сағат бұрын
@@VanderlyndenJengold All military aircraft are expensive to operate. It's also highly depending on where they operate. A Hornet operating on an aircraft carrier is more expensive than a Hornet flying in the midwest. An F-16 flying in Afghanistan is more expensive to operate than one flying in Poland. So it's really not that clear cut to say.