Beloved guest/subscriber, you have discovered my amazing KZbin Channel tailored specifically for you and other beginners and intermediate users. Please do not keep me to yourself (lol). Kindly share my videos and links with your students, colleagues and academic community so that they too can SUBSCRIBE and learn with ease….and for the global community to be aware that applied econometrics can be simplified. My teaching approach is very practical. I adopt a do-as-I-do style. Many thanks to those who have supported me by telling others. Once again, CrunchEconometrix loves to teach, support my Channel with your subscription, likes, feedbacks and sharing my videos with your cohorts. Follow me on Facebook, Twitter and Reddit. Love you all, greatly!!!
@naziasaleem4794 жыл бұрын
Hi
@naziasaleem4794 жыл бұрын
How to interpret the data in excel for ARCH AND GARCH model nd where from get the data plzzz tell me
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Nazia, I have comprehensive videos on GARCH and ARCH modeling. Kindly watch them and listen to the interpretations. GARCH/ARCH data is available free of charge on my website crunchconometrix.com.ng/shop/
@ahlemouhibi35823 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for the video then i have a question when i didn't find an ARCH effect for some countries and i didn't drop it because there are so important in my work. What should i do to get the ARCH effect? Any suggestions ? thanks
@CrunchEconometrix3 жыл бұрын
Ahlem, if your model has no ARCH effect there's nothing to do about it...to the best of my knowledge, though.
@vinushakthi14 жыл бұрын
Dear Adeleye.. Thanks for all your videos. They are really helpful for me for my research analysis. Clearly explained, well delivered. Short and crisp and to the point. You are a wonderful teacher. Thank you so much. God Bless you and your work.
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
You're most welcome, Vinu!
@YuYu-kp4ee4 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. I want to use GARCH, before which I need to test ARCH and that's why I watched this video. It is so clear and logic, thank you.
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the encouraging feedback, Yu. Deeply appreciated! Please may I know from where (location) you are reaching me?
@mohammadtaufan99144 жыл бұрын
Thank you professor, your videos are so easy to understand. I hope you all the good in life for teaching us the beginners
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
So nice of you, Taufan...and amen to your prayers!!!
@rickymacharm98675 жыл бұрын
Hello Professor. I was able to use your videos to pass a course I took on Econometrics...with no prior knowledge. I did mine mostly using open-source R and some Python as I have no useful knowledge of eviews; besides the course required open source tools like R and Python. Your videos broke it down for me to a level a newbie would be comfortable with without losing the essence and thoroughness required in the course.
@CrunchEconometrix5 жыл бұрын
I'm popping champagne for you, Ricky! Congratulations!!! Please tell your colleagues about my Channel...thanks!
@HaiderAli-mu3mq5 жыл бұрын
U R a great teacher whenever i have a problem in eview than i learn through your lecture.... Your teaching method is mazing ❤
@CrunchEconometrix5 жыл бұрын
Compliment is humbly taken, Haider. Thank you. May I know from where (location) you are reaching me?
@HaiderAli-mu3mq5 жыл бұрын
@@CrunchEconometrix Pakistan
@CrunchEconometrix5 жыл бұрын
@@HaiderAli-mu3mq Awesome, Haider! I'll appreciate it if you can share the link to my KZbin Channel with your friends and academic community in Pakistan 🇵🇰 and beyond for awareness...thanks 😊.
@aggelinakapantai81594 жыл бұрын
Great video. I am doing my thesis in calendar anomalies in agricultural futures and i have no idea of ARCH models. These are all new to me. This video is very helpful.
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Aggelina for the encouraging feedback. Deeply appreciated!
@adamroble71065 жыл бұрын
I just liked your explanation! You must be experienced professor.
@CrunchEconometrix5 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha, thanks for the positive feedback Adam😊. May I know from where (location) you are reaching me?
@adamroble71065 жыл бұрын
I am reaching you from Russia, but i am from Somalia. I study here!
@CrunchEconometrix5 жыл бұрын
@@adamroble7106 Awesome! Please spread the word about my videos to your colleagues in Russia 🇷🇺 and Somalia 🇸🇴. They'll learn some useful tips and skills too...thanks 😊
@dijahmasnawi66273 жыл бұрын
i loveee your replies to the below comments. really helpful
@CrunchEconometrix3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Dijah for the positive feedback. Deeply appreciated!
@dijahmasnawi66273 жыл бұрын
@@CrunchEconometrix ❤️❤️❤️
@Maria-tn4cn3 жыл бұрын
GREAT WORK THANKS
@CrunchEconometrix3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Maria!😍
@Dami3992 жыл бұрын
Good day ma, while inserting variables in the "estimate equation" box why did you include the lagged variable I mean r_ftse(-1)? And is it always compulsory to do that?
@CrunchEconometrix2 жыл бұрын
Hi Folakemi, you need to first understand the model specification BEFORE estimation the model. Please watch the clip again and pay attention to the model specification for you to know the essence of the lagged term.
@parvejmahmud17403 жыл бұрын
Hello, nice to share the videos. I thing I don’t understand how did you load the data?
@CrunchEconometrix3 жыл бұрын
Parvel, kindly watch my video on how to import excel file into EViews.
@alibabausman9743 Жыл бұрын
Well done Prof. Ahhm! in estimate ARCH effects, is there need for order of integration? that is at what stationarity does a researcher run the ARCH model. is it that all variable must be significant at levels, or first difference, or both? Thank you..
@CrunchEconometrix Жыл бұрын
Alibaba, I gave clear explanations about what to do. You may want to watch the video again and adapt to your study.
@alvise21653 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your video! How I identify if there is a higher-order of ARCH? I have volatility clustering but if I try to test for an ARCH(1) it does not show arch effect
@CrunchEconometrix3 жыл бұрын
Alvise, if the test shows no ARCH effects why do you want to create one?
@naveenkumar29682 жыл бұрын
I am checking the relationship of 3 ratios on stock returns .. I find in the literature that they have given LM statistic variable wise .. not for the entire model .. how to get the LM statistic variable wise
@CrunchEconometrix2 жыл бұрын
I have no idea about this, Naveen. You may want to check out other online resources. Thanks.
@ololadedejo-ojomo58384 жыл бұрын
Hi Ngozi, thank you for the video. it reallly helped as your presentation is clear and delivered. However can i test for arch effect on stock price rather than the returns?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Ololade, thanks for the positive feedback. Deeply appreciated! Yes, you can use prices. May I know from where (location) you are reaching me?
@mohammedyunus1392 Жыл бұрын
What if I unable to reject the null hypothesis. Can I use Grach model? Without arch rejecting null hypothesis?
@CrunchEconometrix Жыл бұрын
Hi Mohd, if there are no ARCH effects, you can not use the GARCH technique.
@mohammedyunus1392 Жыл бұрын
@@CrunchEconometrix can I do it by taking returns first difference?
@CrunchEconometrix Жыл бұрын
You can.
@TheLittleTurtle-tu1vy2 жыл бұрын
How can we download the data? I can't found it in the given link.
@CrunchEconometrix2 жыл бұрын
Hi Muhammad, due to abuse and unethical conduct datasets used in my videos are no longer free (some are free though) but available on my website upon payment. Here's the link cruncheconometrix.com/view/datashop.php
@ruchi33592 жыл бұрын
How to apply Ljung box q statistics in e-views
@CrunchEconometrix Жыл бұрын
Hi Ruchi, kindly watch my ARCH and ARIMA videos in EViews. Thanks.
@markussalberg23604 жыл бұрын
When I run a Q-test using (corrgram in STATA) on my squared residuals the correlations show strong evidence towards GARCH-effects, but when I do the archlm-test I fail to reject H0. What can I conclude from this?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
You decide which test you want to adopt after understanding their underlying assumptions. My advice is that you read up on them.
@abhishekbawa76154 жыл бұрын
I have one doubt, how do you determine if the model has an Arch effect? I didnt understand the part where you had discussed regarding the p value and the R2 value? Could you please elaborate on that?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Abhishek, explanation is clear and straightforward. A significant pvalue validates the presence of ARCH. Please watch the clip again. Thanks.
@honeycleetus36454 жыл бұрын
Ma'am the data used to be a log value of daily returns or actual value of return? Which one can be used for checking heteroscedasticity test-actual or log value?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
You can use the raw or log form.
@thelonelyone27134 жыл бұрын
This is the best GARCH-explaining video I watched so far, thank you so much, but I have a question I have monthly data of stock returns, when I test for ARCH effect, it is rejected at lag 1, but probability value is significant at lag 2. What should I do in this case? does this mean that I need to include two lags in the mean equation? help me please
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the encouraging feedback. Deeply appreciated! As I mentioned, this test is just to confirm if you need to engage the ARCH procedure or not.
@mustanggemini21564 жыл бұрын
Hi Dr. Hope you are doing well. My data is monthly percentage change in the CPI for 9 years (And it has passed the stationary test). However, ARCH(1) test is not significant (p-value >0.05). What's your comment if I want to proceed to GARCH (1 1) model . Thank you Dr.
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Khairul, thanks for the positive feedback and kind remarks about my KZbin videos. Deeply appreciated! The rule is simple: no arch effects, no ARCH model. Hence, no GARCH model too.
@mohammedarmah90354 жыл бұрын
Hi Dr. Thanks for your lovely video. Please when there is no arch effect after the data has passed stationery . Please what is way forward in order for presence of arch effect before proceed to GARCH(1, 1) model.
@afiqahismail74284 жыл бұрын
Hi Dr.! Thanks for the video, it is really helpful. I just wanna ask, if I want to test for presences of ARCH(3) effects, do I need to include all variable like this [r_ftse c r_ftse(-1) r_ftse(-2) r_ftse(-3)]?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Afiqah, the software computes that automatically.
@SinChick934 жыл бұрын
Hi, I love your videos and find them super beneficial however i have a question Im running this test for 11 different time series, for one country i have broken time period into three parts and one of the periods is insignificant and we accept the null but if we run the test for the overall period or the other two parts they are significant, do we still estimate the arch? and if we look at the graph it is evident of volatility clustering. however it is highly insignificant for ARCH 1 lag but I have tried 2 lags and the probability then becomes significant, I'm not sure what this means?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
I'm not clear about your query, Siri.
@SinChick934 жыл бұрын
@@CrunchEconometrix what happens if I still run the estimate garch for a model where the probability test isn't significant?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
It implies there's no volatility in the variable.
@SinChick934 жыл бұрын
But when I change the arch lag to 2, it becomes significant? What does this mean?
@dasundesilva55883 жыл бұрын
Is r_ftse c r_ftse(-1) the same as typing r_ftse c ar(1)?
@CrunchEconometrix3 жыл бұрын
Dasun, my videos are well-explained. Kindly follow what I did. Thanks.
@cssunita34633 жыл бұрын
Thank your great teaching Pls help me to interpret my results Heteroskedasticity Test: ARCH F-statistic 4.108053 Prob. F(1,295) 0.0436 Obs*R-squared 4.079100 Prob. Chi-Square(1) 0.0434 I think I am not able to reject the null hypothesis at a 1% level of significance. can I use the 5% level?
@CrunchEconometrix3 жыл бұрын
Yes, Sunita.
@ramandeepsingh90594 жыл бұрын
Hello, Madam, Do we need a stationary series for running the ARCH model?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Ramandeep, yes. Kindly watch the video again and the prerequisites. I covered the basics. Please may I know from where (location) you are reaching me?
@ramansingh75604 жыл бұрын
@@CrunchEconometrix india
@meriawazhipehchaanhai...68214 жыл бұрын
mam i have 2 queries here kindly guide me : 1st how you decided 1 lag for arch lm test. 2nd in case if we do not want to model Garch but our model has hetero than what would be alternate.
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Meenakshi, lag as obtained is covered in all my time series videos. Once there is ARCH effects, advisable to estimate either ARCH or GARCH.
@meriawazhipehchaanhai...68214 жыл бұрын
@@CrunchEconometrix mam truly you are very kind hearted and great teacher that we have with us... thankyou so much for your guidance.and always keep us enlightening with your knowledge.
@kumruorkun39472 жыл бұрын
Tnx
@CrunchEconometrix2 жыл бұрын
U're welcome, Kumru! 🥰🙏
@rupaljain74454 жыл бұрын
the probability is coming out as 0.021, what should i infer?
@CrunchEconometrix4 жыл бұрын
Hi Rupal, I interpreted my results. Kindly adapt to yours. Thanks.