"I'm prepared to wait until hell freezes over for my answer" has got to be the most badass line ever to be said in a UN meeting lol
@crashb1336 жыл бұрын
I just love how everyone is laughing at a super serious moment
@michaelburke59074 жыл бұрын
They laughed because the Russians were caught red handed in a huge lie to the world.
@ousarlxsfjsbvbg85884 жыл бұрын
Michael Burke and the us has never done anything similar?
@actualideas80784 жыл бұрын
Michael Burke no, they are laughing at you. The arms race was propaganda. Even JFK said the UN would be a joint mission to the moon. They are a diaspora working together.
@actualideas80784 жыл бұрын
Ousarlxs Fjsbvbg only the UN exists anymore. The US doesn’t even have power to levy war.
@juliancumming68934 жыл бұрын
Cause it was a bullshit answer
@66Bunn4 жыл бұрын
Adlai was the man. So calm, cool and collected (people often mistook that for weakness). He was the perfect choice as UN Ambassador.
@HUNmerlin2 жыл бұрын
I thought hollywood dramatized the conversation in the movie thirteen days but it's the same word for word. amazing exchange
@PointReflex Жыл бұрын
The director of the movie filmed the UN scene while playing the real conference in an adyacent monitor so he could have the closest match to historical accuracy in both the scenary, the body expresions and the dialoge. Also a lot, and I mean A LOT of the dialogs and recreated scenes in the film are verbatim copys of the real events, even in some of them the film changes into monochrome when they are recreating real vintage filming and pictures taken during that period of time. Of course it also has its share of brutal inaccuracies though.
@pjabrony8280 Жыл бұрын
"Don't wait for the translation" is one of the most brilliant pieces of rhetoric. He saw that Zorin was stalling and called him out on it, both in a way that didn't accuse him outright, and which was understood by everyone. Even if Zorin didn't understand English, everyone knew what the issue was, and if the parties were reversed and a Soviet ambassador used the words "da" and "nyet" at the end of a sentence, the American would know what was meant. But saying it that way carried the subtext of, "You're stalling because you don't have an answer, and if I had to make that point any more elaborately, you'd just gain more time."
@peterdavidson66543 жыл бұрын
Lol, apparently Kennedy's reaction to this was "I never knew Adlai had it in him. Too bad he didn't show some of this steam in the 1956 campaign"
@peterdavidson66543 жыл бұрын
@Ranuk Abeylath Nah the description date is wrong. This is during the october 62 cuban missile crisis
@CathyKitson3 жыл бұрын
Adlai showed here he had a very black sense of humour! "Don't wait for the translation, yes or no?...I'm prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that's your decision." I think everyone was laughing because they were so bloody TERRIFIED!!!
@zwazas2 жыл бұрын
Cool profile picture
@dongrey89754 жыл бұрын
If you get an chance to get the DVD Thirteen Days, by all means get it~!
@viarnay4 жыл бұрын
A splendid movie
@selerim3 жыл бұрын
I got the dvd movie and yes splendid movie
@kimberleyredlich36233 жыл бұрын
Just watching it now 👍🏼
@brokenskullgaming17332 жыл бұрын
Gem of a movie ❤️
@martybreeden61163 жыл бұрын
A moment that CHANGED HISTORY!!
@johnfeer96092 жыл бұрын
My Father a Disabled Veteran of World War Two, loved Adlai Stevenson, happily voted for him twice...
@That_Random_Bloke6 жыл бұрын
I love how the Bond movie “A View to a Kill” just nicked the Russian ambassador’s name for the villain
@falafeldurum20955 жыл бұрын
I love how Star Trek VI has this "don't wait for the translation" as well - but even better: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gWa2pXqoea-Ia9k
@ТомасАндерсон-в1е4 жыл бұрын
This is an iconic moment in TV history. With a LOT of references to it. Just like the Kennedy's speech about quarantine
@Kylel05196 жыл бұрын
“You’re in a court of world opinion”
@rondadoolin70843 жыл бұрын
YESSSSS !!!!! When the PICS come out NO ONE WAS LAUGHING THEN !!!
@alexandrebertrand-lafleur31142 жыл бұрын
2:16 The best and strong quote from Adlai Stevenson, Michael Fairman did it in Thirteen Days!
@jerrymathers115 жыл бұрын
Why don't politicians speak like this any more? - by "this," I mean the cadence and somewhat poetic diction. Most American politicians regardless of party sound like under-educated troglodytes.
@66Bunn5 жыл бұрын
Because Adlai Stevenson was a very eloquent public speaker, even considering the standards back in those days
@michaelburke59074 жыл бұрын
In fact, because Adlai Stevenson was so well spoken he was often characterized by his political foes as an egg headed intellectual who was soft on communism. Cretins like Joe McCarthy and Curtis LeMay were more the norm in certain circles.
@thegoatboy1024 жыл бұрын
for the most part that way of speaking was a fake constructed accent for the elite of america. it was halfway british and halfway american.
@kieran60574 жыл бұрын
I think it probably has something to do with the fact that Americans in general now speak a lot more dumbed down and many are just stupid nowadays so they have to tailor their speaches so the ordinary man can understand
@ryanfrederick33762 жыл бұрын
Because they are
@Bnio Жыл бұрын
The laughter here is a great example of emotional tension being released in unexpected way.
@rebimaloisane84094 жыл бұрын
He said “ I got receipts”😭😭😭
@NxDoyle6 жыл бұрын
Busted.
@sebastianhahn35404 жыл бұрын
JFK watching this must be like “I gotcha, what you gonna day now?!”
@cameleyez4 жыл бұрын
Have you seen 13 Days? Scene plays out just like that.
@smoon23134 жыл бұрын
The shot of the room at the beginning looks like it’s from Dr. Strangelove
@CathyKitson3 жыл бұрын
"Don't wait for the translation - yes or no?" Nervous, gallows-humour laughter. _Oh, shit, we're on the brink of nuclear destruction and he's winding up the Russians!_
@Yaivenov Жыл бұрын
Stevenson knew the Russian Ambassador spoke fluent English, and that he was just using the translations to stunt and stall, so Adelai called him on it.
@CathyKitson Жыл бұрын
@@Yaivenov Oh well, that's different. "I can wait til hell freezes over." Even now it brings a smile to my face.
@NRV02 жыл бұрын
Watched "13 Days" and came here haha!
@tomace4898 Жыл бұрын
He saved us. He saved the world.
@Noah-xq6hw3 жыл бұрын
That man said don’t wait for the translation YES OR NO😂😂😂😂
@troyconservative67222 жыл бұрын
Because the bastard speaks English just fine. He uses the translation time to speak on how to actually answer the question thinking that we don't know the Russian language LOL. He was a conniving sob
@mele85872 жыл бұрын
Great moment...👍🏻😎😂
@lmy97914 жыл бұрын
I also laughed when the crowd laugh
@jrave53533 жыл бұрын
Adlai brought the receipts!!
@emmarose42343 жыл бұрын
“I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision.” 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
@alexandrebertrand-lafleur31142 жыл бұрын
Robert Kennedy had his answer about Stevenson when he hear the line!
@robertrogers83542 жыл бұрын
Funny how history repeats itself in 2022...
@charlottemac7912 Жыл бұрын
Wow wow ... very cool to see the live footage
@funsea41674 жыл бұрын
U.S.S.R.: Какие доказательства? C.C.P.: 有什么证据? D.P.R.K.: 어떤 증거? Venezuela/Cuba: ¿Que evidencia? Different languages, same lies.
@Nekromongus7 ай бұрын
Обнаглевший американец совсем берега попутал, Зорин красавчик!🎉
@michaelnear20392 жыл бұрын
"I am prepared to wait until hell freezes over if thar's your decision."
@jhyland875 жыл бұрын
None of these vids show his reply?! What did he say?
@nmitchxll3055 жыл бұрын
idk
@kacperjabuszewski88884 жыл бұрын
My russian is not that great, but he said (to the "yes or no?" part) something along the lines of "I'm not in a american courtroom" and then (to the "im willing to wait 'till hell freezes over" part) said "The US will have their response later, this is the UN"
@gloriasheen63364 жыл бұрын
@@kacperjabuszewski8888 what happened after they showed the evidence?
@66PHILB3 жыл бұрын
He stonewalled. There was nothing else he could do.
@_Aspxn_official3 жыл бұрын
i have an investigation about this topic right now, and of what i have searched he said no, but it was obviously a true fact
@fredysanmiguel44882 жыл бұрын
this is quite similar to what they depict on the movie 13 days!!!
@asheer91142 жыл бұрын
Because this is a recording of the REAL events with happen in the 1962 at emergency session of the UN Security Council... and what was reprised later on in the 13 Days movie.
@bridgecross2 жыл бұрын
It's uncanny.
@ThePiantanida314 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@javiermoretti1825 Жыл бұрын
What belongs to the photo?
@katnnumber1fan2 жыл бұрын
I think the movie 13 days was the perfect film about this situation. Saddly, we have more psychotic dictators in this world today that are honestly face to face pushing for a nuclear disaster. Soon enough...im thinking in the next 1-5 years...a nuclear weopon is gonna be fired.
@lukestrawwalker2 жыл бұрын
Yes... terrific film, but there was ONE GLARING ERROR in the film... the Frog 7 battlefield nukes the USSR had also sent to Cuba WERE NOT KNOWN to the US at the time... it wasn't until after the fall of the USSR in the early 90's that it became known that the Soviets had in fact sent battlefield nuclear missiles to Cuba, in addition to their MRBM's and IRBM's designed to hit the US mainland. I saw an interview with McNamara where he said that basically IF the US had decided to go with the air strikes and then invade Cuba to get rid of the missiles, there WOULD have been a nuclear war. The US was also unaware that due to the limitations of Soviet command and control of their nuclear arsenal at the time, the local commanders in the field had been given authority to use their nuclear weapons on their own authority if they believed they were at war and couldn't get permission from Moscow to use the weapons, particularly if it came down to a "use it or lose it" proposition, ie incoming air attack on the missile sites, submarines, or invasion. That's why the submarine that was being "held under" by patrolling US destroyers, who were dropping depth grenades to ping the hull without damaging it, to "convince" them to surface and heave to for inspection, *ALMOST* fired their nuclear torpedo at the US ships preventing them from surfacing-- they were running out of air and it was well over 100 degrees inside the Soviet sub, which was designed to operate in cold polar waters not in the hot Caribbean waters near Cuba, and both the political officer and first officer had voted to use their nuclear torpedo, interpreting the grenade bangs against the hull as hostile intent, along with the US destroyers patrolling too closely to allow them to surface. Only the captain, who's name I can't recall but IIRC he was the same guy on K-19 who prevented the meltdown and saved the ship, (Played by Liam Neeson in the movie) voted against the use of the nuclear torpedo, interpreting the bang grenades as just saying, "we know you're there, we COULD attack you with depth bombs, surface for inspection" and that the US ships had orders to dog them in the quarantine area, and they had to move away from it to surface for air. Had he consented to his political officer and first officer's demand to launch the nuclear torpedo, he could have decimated the US Navy patrol ships on the quarantine line hounding him, but it WOULD have caused a nuclear war. Had the US chosen to invade Cuba, the battlefield nuke armed Frog missiles would have vaporized and obliterated the US invasion troops on the beach, and would certainly have provoked a nuclear war. The US would have been taken TOTALLY by surprise, because they DIDN'T know the Frogs were even in Cuba-- they hadn't been captured on any of the surveillance photos from the U-2's or other overflights. They could have easily stumbled into that decision since they didn't know and by invading triggered off a nuclear war. Later! OL J R :)
@47imagine2 жыл бұрын
Adlai: "And btw, I have terminal cancer." Crowd: (laughter)
@ethan19942012 Жыл бұрын
The date is wrong. This didn’t happen in 1963
@eta0carinae Жыл бұрын
right, it's 1962
@UTock2 жыл бұрын
Back when the UN meant something
@luzifer21605 жыл бұрын
back when the US didn't show false evidence to the United Nations.
@briankey15255 жыл бұрын
They still don't you liberal fuck
@burn_out5 жыл бұрын
Brian Key Wow Colin Powell chill out
@francissemyon79714 жыл бұрын
The false WMD is a 2003 data, 18 years old delay you libtard.
@paulfisker4 жыл бұрын
@@briankey1525 talking about Iraq?
@TheGermanItalianGuy24 жыл бұрын
@@briankey1525 They demonstrably have though, whats even the point of denying reality? Just to "own the libs"? You are acting like the Soviet ambassador in this.
@the_albanian_meme60415 жыл бұрын
2:16
@SupertzarMetal2 жыл бұрын
Stand firm, and you will prevail.
@xdrapyt98374 жыл бұрын
Cuba para mi 👉👈
@ilmappatorepiemontese94364 жыл бұрын
Chi viene da Heikudo?
@SuperTonyony2 жыл бұрын
The plural of "photo" is "photos".
@HoorayItsChris2 жыл бұрын
Stevenson: "What this guy replies could spark nuclear war ..." UN Assembly "Bahahahaha!"
@FrancoM7747 Жыл бұрын
There was a nod to this in Star Trek VI.
@Newdivide4 жыл бұрын
This scene appeared in the 90s film matinee starring John Goodman
@JeepersCreepers20133 жыл бұрын
Yep they pulled them out because we took ours out of Turkey
@VersusARCH3 жыл бұрын
Also because of US naval superiority.
@chetpomeroy13993 жыл бұрын
I've heard that they were slated for removal before the eruption of the crisis. They were replaced by newer, faster, more-accurate Polaris SLBMs aboard U.S. Naval submarines stationed in the Mediterranean.
@asheer91142 жыл бұрын
@@chetpomeroy1399 Don't forget mid range Pershing missiles placed in West Germany to prevent Warsaw Pact from any attempt of invading Western Europe.
@lukestrawwalker2 жыл бұрын
@@chetpomeroy1399 That, and longer range, newer Thor IRBM's based in Britain. The Jupiters were first generation medium range ballistic missiles (shorter range than intermediate range ballistic missiles like Thor) and after the Soviets demonstrated their ability to hit the US with an ICBM, via the launch of Sputnik which was launched into orbit by their R-7 "Semyorka" ICBM, the US was in a tizzy because they were late to the party in realizing the importance of ICBM's and starting their own ICBM development program. As a stopgap measure, the medium range Jupiters were moved within range of the Soviet Union which meant basing them in Italy and Turkey. The Jupiters were rather primitive early missiles, fueled with liquid kerosene and liquid oxygen, so they required a lengthy fueling process before launch and were highly vulnerable based on surface launch pads, and could only remain on alert ready for launch in times of tension for a relatively short period, as the cryogenic liquid oxygen constantly boiled off inside the rocket's propellant tanks and had to be replenished constantly, until the finite supply available was used up. The Jupiters weren't very dependable or reliable either, as they had a lot of problems-- NASA tried to use some of them with a solid propellant upper stage assembly similar to the early "Jupiter-C" launch vehicles which used a Redstone short range ballistic missile as a first stage, with the same solid upper stage assembly. "Jupiter-C" launched the first US satellite into orbit, Explorer 1, in early 1958. The Juno launch vehicle using the Jupiter missile for a first stage had the most troubled history of any US launch vehicle and was quickly scrapped. By 1962 the Jupiters were obsolete-- the US had hundreds of Atlas and Titan I ICBM's ready and capable of striking the Soviet Union from the US mainland, and had more advanced Thors going into Britain, based further from the Soviet Union and thus more secure and less vulnerable to being taken out in a Soviet attack before they could be launched. The US also had its solid propellant submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBM's) on patrol ready to attack the USSR if required, along with the formidable capabilities of the SAC bombers and their thousands of nuclear bombs. The USSR was highly vulnerable at the time-- their Semyorka's also used kerosene/LOX fuel and had the same drawbacks as Jupiter, and were too large for silos or more protected launchers, so were on highly vulnerable surface pads. The USSR had done a crash program to develop new ICBM's like the R-9 and R-11 which would use room temperature storable hypergolic liquid propellants, which despite being HIGHLY toxic and corrosive, could remain in the missile fuel tanks for months at a time so the missile was ready to fire at a moment's notice, and small enough to be stored in and launched from underground silos. This rush to complete the missiled had directly led in 1960 to the "Nedelin disaster" where several hundred missile designers, scientists, engineers, and technicians, along with the new head of the new Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces, a new branch of service overseeing all Soviet nuclear missiles, General Nedelin, and most of his entourage of staff and aides, were incinerated when a fully fueled R-9 missile having trouble on the pad was ordered to be repaired by Nedelin to keep to the schedule, so instead of pumping the fuel out of it and then working on it per safety procedures, he ordered it worked on fully fueled, and it exploded, killing most everyone by incinerating them, including himself and his entourage who went to the pad to oversee the work was done. At the time, these new missiles were not available in any substantial numbers-- the Soviets only had about maybe a dozen ICBM's capable of hitting the US from Soviet territory-- they had thousands of MRBM's and IRBM's, but only a small handful of ICBM's. If they could sneak in MRBM's and IRBM's only 90 miles off the US coast into Cuba, it would give them the ability to launch dozens of warheads into the US mainland on short notice, just as Jupiter had for the US if launched from Turkey in the late 50's before Atlas and Titan 1 was available. The problem was, they got caught. The US couldn't allow the Soviet missiles in Cuba, because the flight times to the US were SO short-- only a matter of minutes from launch to impact on target. This gave NO TIME for detection, verification an attack was actually under way and not just a glitch or "ghost on the radar" or whatever, and then communicate up the chain of command, the proper decisions made, and orders issued and transmitted to the silos and bases to launch the US ICBM's or bombers from their bases before the Soviet Cuban missiles arrived and detonated and destroyed them. Basically it reduced the US response time to a "launch on warning" system which was FAR more dangerous because any MISTAKE could lead to a missile launch by the US in a "use it or lose it" type situation... Yes the Soviets had been in a similar situation due to Jupiters in Turkey and Italy, BUT th US had ALSO pledged "no first use" for what it was worth... whereas the Soviets had not. The whole premise of relatively short range missiles being based just outside the borders of the enemy country was extremely destabilizing because of this, and the reduced response time it created due to short flight times of the missiles based so close... SO that's why the Jupiters were being removed, and why the US couldn't allow the Soviets to put shorter range missiles in Cuba aimed at the US. Later! OL J R :)
@realnapster15222 жыл бұрын
@@lukestrawwalker then why is now US allowing Ukraine to join NATO and host nuclear missiles? Isn’t it same as Cuban missile crisis? Isn’t Russia justified now to stop this expansion by creating a buffer zone between NATO and Moscow?
@felipecastaneda34604 ай бұрын
el video es una conjunción de muchas cosas. primero, la calidad de los diplomaticos rusos. inteligentes, y simpáticos, y por el otro lado la arrogancia yankee burlada con las risas del público
@labratamber Жыл бұрын
Watching this after seeing the movie THIRTEEN DAYS
@junbug4997 Жыл бұрын
Who is here after watching the movie 13 days ?
@IndianSummer205 күн бұрын
Yes, Ambassador Zorin gave the correct answer during that tense exchange. I will not let myself be kicked around, that is what he meant. You will have your answer in due time. Great Russian diplomat! And he laughed, too. Cooled down the situation.
@suelyleonelafonso64524 жыл бұрын
Nikita e Dalai num confronto de provas na ONU provando para o mundo a existência de mísseis em Cuba.
@bridgecross2 жыл бұрын
Compare these moments; when the CIA and US military gave Adlai correct and honest intelligence to bring to the U.N. Or when the Bush administration filtered and combed and created sketchy information for Colin Powell to bring to the U.N. Powell should have insisted on his own analysis, but he was too much of a good soldier, too much of a team player. He deserved better.
@Colonelcheeser2 жыл бұрын
The fuck he did
@Fulschermd Жыл бұрын
Only after the Kennedy administration left Adlai in the dark on the Bay of Pigs, which led to great loss of prestige for the U.S. And Powell went through and hand selected the evidence he used and that he had confidence in. He threw out a lot of what was given to him.
@alanwatson2562 жыл бұрын
America had missiles in Turkey pointed at Russia, and Russia requested that America for many years, have the missiles removed.
@alanwatson2562 жыл бұрын
Violation or not,treaty or not, Russia saw it as an act of aggression just as the US saw the missiles in in Cuba as an act of aggression US lied about WMD in Iraq. Being attaked in the gulf of Tokin which started the Vietnam war at the cost of 58000+ Young American lives, so lets not spit in the wind.
@WhackDaddy_Bannon Жыл бұрын
The difference is the US never denied or hid the fact about Turkey. The soviets lied to the entire world in order to hold the US and most of the world hostage. Russia also never offered anything in return for removing the missiles from Turkey. They just wanted us to bend over and take it. The Cuban missile crisis showed the world that the US was the true super power.
@xsodidiaz30712 жыл бұрын
That's why you don't sting the bear's bellie,if is not mothering you,in this world there is a lot of players and some times we have to be humble and recognize that some others and not only the USA have the whole power in this world,how and when we are going to learn that.
@gatosfidel2 жыл бұрын
Then USSR put ICBM in the borders of USA but today attacking to the UKRAINE because wanted to join NATO In the future.
@robatss_6 жыл бұрын
CURB YOUR MISSILES
@NxDoyle6 жыл бұрын
I don't know what British Movietone is, an organisation or just some guy trying to give the impression of same. Either way, "photos" requires no apostrophe and the person who included it should know better.
@bobbysands69232 жыл бұрын
What? Do you expect literacy these days?
@dannyshipley75902 жыл бұрын
Stevenson....I'll get my answer..and wait till hell freezes over... 🇺🇸Very statesmanlike🇺🇸
@dontbothermeimjust123 жыл бұрын
Why the fuck did they place the Chilean delegate giving his time to the American one in the movie, when it clearly did not happen? What kind of propaganda was that?
@asheer91142 жыл бұрын
@Martinab. Perhaps in the 1962 Chile did have its representative in the UN Security Council?.. remember by the way that there are Fifth Steady members (so called Nuclear Powers with power of the Veto) and if I'm not mistaken about 20 rotating members who can participate in the debates but without right to veto. And this clip is not a movie but recording of the REAL time events regarding Cuba Crisis in the SC.
@fret16 жыл бұрын
🤯
@100iliasm2 жыл бұрын
it is wrong.... he is talking about NATO in the doorstep of Russia....
@cowfat85472 жыл бұрын
huh
@viarnay4 жыл бұрын
The soviet Russia never got recovered of this humilliation.
@realnapster15222 жыл бұрын
There was no humiliation. They both agreed to a mutual deal.
@viarnay2 жыл бұрын
@@realnapster1522 that has nothing to do because they lied
@pylgrym2 жыл бұрын
Omit the apostrophe in your title.
@marnickfox98912 жыл бұрын
America always play the boss but the Soviet union wasn't a country that would've accepted.
@coco_pepper2 жыл бұрын
Было такое, но там мутная история.
@jeweltilak7673 жыл бұрын
Indy
@lomasterr4 жыл бұрын
I love US ambassador's hysterics: tell me, tell me "yes" or "no"...USSR placed rockets in Cuba after USA placed rockets in Turkey. For ones who wonder what mr. Zorin's answer was: "I am not in an American court and therefore do not want to answer the question that is asked by the tone of the prosecutor. You will receive the answer in due time in my speech as a representative of the Soviet Union."
@asheer91142 жыл бұрын
ruskij troll detected!
@captainnutsack81512 жыл бұрын
Hysterics lol. Look everyone, it's a low-IQ cretin who defends the Soviet Union lol
@peteralainszpiriev47505 жыл бұрын
In fact youre will be known of Russia only if youre towns are completely destroyed if you attack any of great Russia.
@briankey15255 жыл бұрын
Haha haha! The US could kick Russia's broken down, second rate ass any day comrade!
@chetpomeroy13993 жыл бұрын
@@briankey1525 No sane person wants a nuclear war, whether they're the leaders of a nation or the common citizens.
@obisanchez52863 жыл бұрын
@@briankey1525 They later killed ur president
@kuwaitking4240 Жыл бұрын
فوزا عظيما س د ب م ر س توتو المحبين خاصة لجنود الله اكبر المخالفين جدضذ التحويل رادار
@YG-ez9ot3 жыл бұрын
Did I hear “oh shiiit”
@ลุงปิแอร์6 жыл бұрын
Same lies than Collin Powell ‘earlier’?
@tjflorida23046 жыл бұрын
Liars then...liars now Communist left then Communist Democrats now.
@BigGuyDave5246 жыл бұрын
well said , nothing but the truth
@roncardenas29633 жыл бұрын
True statement. Commies in the House. Get em out.
@66PHILB3 жыл бұрын
Can you imagine how the Cuban Missile Crisis would have ended up with Trump in the White House? Say goodbye to all of us.