The Environmental Effects of Climate Change On Our Planet | Breakthrough

[@MyLoganTreks]

VOTE for Politicians who aren't corruptable by big oil. Facts are for every degree warmer, the atmosphere holds 7% more moisture, and the more common atmospheric rivers we are experiencing.

[@zoeathomson4305]

It'll get a bit wetter as it goes through it's cycle and it's warmer than the ice age cycle!!!! Nobody can stop earth's cycles !!!! You have to educate ourselves into believing the real facts about our planet. How many times does it snow ball How many more times will it snow ball. What world history do we know about the HOT AGE!? WE Don't LIVE LONG ENOUGH TO KNOW.

[@justinjefferson5831]

Hahahahahahahaha brainwashed.

[@Supportingtruth8258]

​@@justinjefferson5831yep, that's exactly what you are!!

[@justinjefferson5831]

@@Supportingtruth8258 Hahahaha. As proved by merely pointing out that the whole thing is nothing but corruption and propaganda? You admit you are brainwashed because you confuse science with television, government propaganda, and corporate grifting - can't tell the difference - and you DON'T CARE that 100% of their doomsday predictions have proved FLATLY INCORRECT. You're saying you don't care about the truth. That's what you're saying. Only fools believe the globe is about to become uninhabitable because of alleged manmade catastropic global warming. Only gullible simpletons, or people with an anxiety disorder, or power freaks, buy into the whole pile of obvious hype and propaganda. The proof is that you can't even state your case without wallowing in contradicdtion and absurdity HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!

[@minealsomine9663]

Or stop believing the bullshit lies. I cannot understand how people can be so damned gullible especially in a time where information is readily available. Just a note Einstein, the earth's climate has always changed and we humans have minimal impact on anything.

[@loopylynda1974]

OUR CHILDREN WILL PAY THE PRICE FOR OUR UNWILLINGNESS TO MAKE SACRIFICES TODAY AND OUR INSATIABLE GREED...

[@jeaninehicks2907]

WE, along with our kids and grandkids 😢

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

The problem is not the unwilling but rather those who even understand /ignore the facts

[@orca1717]

Even if we know this, we all need to make action plans. And, with too much conspiracy theories going on (which might hold truth to some degrees), we do need to plan step by step shifts into more energy sufficient, environmentally friendly way of living. Just fighting with those who hold authorities is like babies with tantrum. We need more data, planning, and brilliant problem solving skills!!!! No more just yelling for change. We need change IN OURSELVES & IN OUR MINDS!!! All of us need to use each individual skills to come to advance in this new era 🌏🌎🌍

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

@@orca1717 we have already enough data for this but we don't do it

[@orca1717]

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Well, but the data is conflicting, and also manipulated (funded largely) by companies with power, and no one can deny that facts. Also, each one of us can’t just do things the better way when the better way is more costly (in the time of inflation, we are naturally less inclined to do that.) It’s a systematic problem that every each of us needs to chip in for the better ideas. You can’t just blame the big corporations or government. “WE” are you and me, and everyone on earth.

[@Me97202]

We were warned. We did nothing. We deserve this.

[@Thorny_Misanthrope]

The plants and animals don’t.

[@MrPapamaci88]

​@@Thorny_Misanthrope Nature doesn't care either way. Also even though specialist species will be wiped out by climatic and environmental changes as they were before during mass extinctions do not forget that the generalists tend to survive and then they shall diversify. Nature as a whole won't ever care about us, the survivors will diversify, nature will heal and retake everything. Life is far hardier as a whole than we are. Do not kid yourself, the reason humanity battles climate change is to save our own sorry asses. Conservation efforts are less about saving plants and animals and more about maintaining ecosystems. Sadly very few people care about anything outside their own lives.

[@margaretwebb389]

We can’t control congress and big oil!!!

[@MrPapamaci88]

@@margaretwebb389 Yes, we could but that would get really bloody really fast.

[@MrPapamaci88]

@@margaretwebb389 That would mean war and no one wants that. There's enough blood being spilled already.

[@CrystalAbrahams]

Excellent graphics and well written content. Crystal in Canada 🇨🇦

[@bill8985]

Don't forget to mention Eunice Foote - who discovered CO2 atmospheric warming earlier that Tyndall by three years. But she was a girl and back then, boys ruled.

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

It's around 200 years ago. And now we are here 😢

[@robertmarmaduke186]

Aarhenius was first but he concluded CO2 And water vapor tend to MODERATE temperatures, so Greta quickly discarded his pioneering work.

[@bill8985]

​@@robertmarmaduke186 first how? Eunice Foote's discoveries (in her 1850's experiments!), "revealed that certain gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), warm when exposed to sunlight. She hypothesized that higher CO2 levels in the past would have significantly affected Earth’s temperature, foreshadowing our understanding of the greenhouse effect." Arrhenius didn't make note of this phenomena until 1896. So not sure of your claim that Arrhenius was first. In fact, Foote, without specific evidence and purely by intellectual conjecture, was absolutely correct! As during a much earlier geologic period (the Eocene), CO2 levels were higher and the climate temperature back then was also substantially higher (not like 1.5 degrees C that we talk about today - but more like 5 degrees C!) So, the issue with the planet is not its absolute temperature, but the rate of change of temperature. Most every creature I can think of has lived for 10s of millions of years in our moderate climate. They have become acclimated. But if, in the blink of an eye (on an evolutionary or geologic timescale,) has to adapt to a 3 or 4 degree C change within a few centuries... that's the end of that group of animals and plants. Humans included. Got it? And yes, Arrhenius did note that, "in an atmosphere with no carbon dioxide, Earth’s surface temperature would plummet by about 21 degrees Celsius." But we live in an atmosphere that is now around 425 ppm of CO2, substantially higher than when either Foote and Arrhenius were alive. Thus, global sea and surface air temperatures are substantially higher than their 1800s due to the impact of substantially higher CO2 and methane atmospheric concentrations... DUE TO HUMAN CONTRIBUTIONS OF THOSE GASES. It is a simple fact. As for water, you should do a little reading into the impact of water vapor in the atmosphere.... and how the small incremental impact of CO2 and methane tend to occlude an important portion of what is called the “water-vapor window.” I know you want to parrot the newsfeed of your favorite propaganda channel. You want to deny the reality of where the world is headed. You want to be able to tell your children - “everything is OK, just keep your head down and get a job in finance - because then you can afford a nice lifestyle.” But I tell you, there isn’t any amount of praying to a god or a god’s son that will alter our path to 4 or 5 degrees C increase in global temperatures. No technology will save us. So, enjoy your time here. Good luck to you and your kids.

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

@@robertmarmaduke186 what has Greta to do with this topic?

[@robertmarmaduke186]

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Greta's the _paid child actress_ Gore hired to 'bring home' his Carbon Cap & Trade Scheme (actual legal name) green-wáshing extörtion rácket, that's causing $Trillions in structural mal-investment with CRUSHING cost impacts on the Workers. Greta is your Vírgín Máry, your Joán de'Arç!

[@harveytheparaglidingchaser7039]

Unhappy anniversary "During heat waves, Lytton is often the hottest spot in Canada despite its location north of 50°N in latitude. In three consecutive days of June 2021, it broke the all-time record for Canada's highest temperature, ending at 49.6 °C (121.3 °F) on June 29. This is the highest temperature ever recorded north of 45°N and higher than the all-time records for Europe and South America. The next day (June 30), a wildfire swept through the valley, destroying the majority of the town."

[@levmoses742]

Curious what your June has been like this year, and I’m aware there isn’t necessarily consistency. Thanks for your share!

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

"nah it's only geo engineering, cloud seeding and haarp..!"

[@sydfrissell]

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Climate change is IRREVERSABLE! Get it? The temps will NEVER GO DOWN - unless the CO2 already emitted is TAKEN OUT OF THE AIR! Our future generations can expect a "hothouse Earth", like during the dinosaur age - and this age will last for a long, long, long time.

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

@@sydfrissell I get it but I'm not sure if we can reverse it. It's a huge effort but it's possible. I guess if the climate change is going faster than there are no more future generations

[@robertmarmaduke186]

In other words an extreme WEATHER event. It soared above 98°F in Fairbanks every summer under the Midnight sun...but NOT the last two years of Summer With No Summer. *Magic CO2!*

[@carinwiseman4309]

This is 5 years old. It is now 2024. Don't be fooled by upload date.

[@rdallas81]

Thank you for sharing that.

[@gamingtonight1526]

And yet everything they said was correct, only it's worse 5 years later!

[@elinglee8878]

And what did we all do different for the last five years? Not much.

[@MunnyMunroe]

I kinda like global warming. Not one day of 30 degree weather in the west of Canada yet where I live, farmers have had to irrigate barely because of the rain. Soil conditions are crazy good right now. Harvests have been better each year for the past 10 years according to farmers. Moisture has been the same after every El Niño event here. Just love it

[@KarenMafiaMomma]

😅

[@sandipagrawaltalks]

Deforestation is increasing global warming. We need to plant more trees to reduce carbon dioxide levels.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

If only it was that simple. Trees under 20 years old actually emit more CO2 than they absorb, according to Oregon State University. Just digging a hole to plant a tree releases more CO2 from the organisms there than the tree will absorb in several years. What we need to do above all else is preserve old-growth forests because that's where the heavy CO2-lifting is done.

[@karlwheatley1244]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 I pretty much agree with everything you post, and I agree with protecting old-growth forests, but I'm questioning this. How does a growing tree emit more CO2 than it absorbs? I haven't seen that anywhere else and I'm questioning the analysis they did. I get that digging a hole releases some CO2 but fighting the climate crisis is a marathon not a sprint, and what you're saying about trees' CO2 footprint over the first couple of years is like the fact that the carbon footprint of an EV is higher until you get to about 23K miles. In the long run, the EV and more forests are still better (even though fewer vehicles is better still). Large-scale agricultural research on "if everyone adopted a vegan diet" calculated over 600 billion tons of CO2 sequestered by 2050 (bc we could feed the world using 75% less land and could re-forest and re-wild the rest). I don't see anything else on the horizon that could sequester 600 Gt of CO2--and have staggering benefits for biodiversity and water shortages. Of course, people should plant diverse forests and ecosystems, not monoculture plantations, and it should be native species, etc. Take care and thanks for your diligent online work.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@karlwheatley1244 I was just as taken aback by this as you are. The research was conducted by Dr. Beverly Law from Oregon State University. Her research went on for years with some pretty sophisticated equipment. PBS did a profile on her and her work. I tried to post a link to the show but the forum blocked it. However, you can Google it at WEATHERED: SURPRISING TRUTH BEHIND PLANTING TREES AND CLIMATE CHANGE.

[@karlwheatley1244]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 Thanks for the reply.

[@makestank4800]

And phasing out fossil fuels would help too.

[@TheDoomWizard]

We're done.

[@T1fixFelix]

Yessirr

[@SeanMartin-wl5rf]

Yupp goodbye freinds nice knowing you

[@trishdelacour8746]

Good riddance I say

[@sydfrissell]

Climate change is IRREVERSABLE! Get it? The temps will NEVER GO DOWN - unless the CO2 already emitted is TAKEN OUT OF THE AIR! Our future generations can expect a "hothouse Earth", like during the dinosaur age - and this age will last for a long, long, long time.

[@rogermartinez78]

Depends on long it takes our civilization to transition away from fossil fuels, it could take between one thousand and ten thousand years for the climate to recover.

[@dp-kz5cs]

Hey when Siberian melt alone releases more co2 then we could ever ?? get your facts straight even if we stopped now it's on a domino effect 😂 and now we see the results of all that greed .earths done with us ....again...😢

[@rogermartinez78]

@@dp-kz5cs I can tell you and the rest of the folks commenting here are very ignorant, but then again ignorance is bliss.

[@jamemswright3044]

​@@dp-kz5csIf that is true. Why did the melting of the Scandinavian and North American ice sheets not produce similar runaway warming?

[@hearme4581]

This was more informative and not just pushing fear!

[@mayatara1980]

The local climate predictions might change entirely if the AMOC stops. Then the northern hemisphere will more likely plunge into an ice age. Both warm or cold scenarios are terrifying and both can happen sequentially. Every life form will be slowly adapting to the warming and then will be hit by freezing cold. It's a possibility looking more likely by the day. We don't know for sure what will hapoen, but dramatic changes will happen one way or another and no one is able to adapt to such rapid dramatic changes, especially not the plants and animals and ecosystems we depend on for surviving.

[@oceancowboy]

When, not if.

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

I heard if the amoc is going down Europe will be colder but probably not a ice age, maybe I winter it's harder or longer but in summer there are heavy storms and rain are going on. The German scientist "harald lesch" said it like this "imagine in winter when it's cold outside and warm inside, look at the windows how much moisture is there. That will happen to us when Europe is cooling down and the rest of the earth is heating up, those rainfalls we won't experience!" I guess that he is right

[@robertmarmaduke186]

Every species alive today survived dice Ages and tropical waves of 4,000ppm CO2. Why be such a drama queen?

[@karlwheatley1244]

@@robertmarmaduke186 "Every species alive today survived dice Ages and tropical waves of 4,000ppm CO2. Why be such a drama queen?" Regarding the first point, that's misleading and irrelevant. Humans are currently warming the planet ~20 times faster than it usually warms when coming out of an ice age. It is that SPEED of temperature change that makes it so lethal--species don't have the time to adapt or migrate. For example, oak trees are not able to walk 1/4 mile a year, but if temperature change is happening 20-50 times more slowly, where their acorns can make it 50-75 feet from the trunk of the tree. Regarding the second point, NO, they didn't. Global CO2 levels are now the highest they have been in 14 million years; neither humans nor many other species on Earth have ever seen CO2 levels this high. Furthermore, if you are going to look at CO2 charts vs. time, you would be well advised to look at extinction charts vs. time too, because large changes in CO2 levels have been THE main "kill mechanism" for the many extinction events in Earth's history. I always laugh when climate skeptics make a big deal of the "explosion of life" that happened during the Cambrian period "with very high CO2" levels. Those folks don't seem to know that a) the explosion of life was all in the oceans; there was no life on land, b) the largest living things were ~16 inches long, c) the explosion of life appears to have happened because of rising oxygen levels, and d) CO2 levels were lower for most of the Cambrian Period but when they got very high at the end of the Cambrian Period, that triggered a major extinction event. The science is very clear that humans are pushing the whole web of life toward catastrophic collapse in 4 different ways simultaneously, so pointing out the risks from AGW isn't being a drama queen, it's actually being understated regarding the threats we face. Take care.

[@robertmarmaduke186]

@@karlwheatley1244 Submarines have CO2 levels that won't be reached until year 3000. So they are NOT lethal to species. At previous "+1.2°C Since Industrialization" or +0.006°C per year even CLAIMED BUT VERIFIED "+1.8°C by 2100" or measly +0.04°C per year NONE of the extreme weather events *NONE* can be blamed on increasing CO2. *That is ANTI-Science fraud.* The "official" 443ppm CO2 or whatever is bollux, there are readings from other sampling locations as low as 235ppm, that have been taken down so as not to change the narrative. Their 'Hottest Day on Record!' said in the report you didn't read (...climate model simulation...). The track record for all 37 climate models is ABYSSMAL forecasting or hindcasting. *GIGO*

[@ralphnolan3187]

Don’t vote for Donald trump in 2024

[@drawyrral]

this is a story about our hubris

[@bill8985]

and our unending ability to procreate....

[@oceancowboy]

This is a story about profit.

[@drawyrral]

@@oceancowboy otherwise known as capitalism.

[@robertmarmaduke186]

#479 This is a story about unelected self appointed foreign Grifters and Scienters looting Millennials' Boomer Inheritance. FIFY

[@dp-kz5cs]

Hueberous 😂 yes I blame it on that everyday! Buncha greedy useless jerks will pay the price 😂

[@badone3009]

No one made the gas, earth or nature. "Nature gives and nature takes but the creator made you with lots of mistakes, So here I am painting a picture that no one had ever seen" People take the lives of others living just to satisfy their hunger.

[@sahusanalysis7661]

Why still there is only 432 likes so selfish human being shows human itself no interest to stop climate change

[@OldScientist]

There has been a 10% decline in natural disasters since 2000 (CRED). Normalised disaster losses have decreased since 1990 and human mortality due to extreme weather has decreased by more than 95% since 1920, so you're 50 times less likely to die from a climate-related disaster in a world that's 1°C warmer than 100 years ago (EM-DAT, CRED/UC). Deaths from drought have declined by 99%!

[@robertpayne4033]

No, they are not. Even the IPCC note that there is no correlation between a warming world and any extreme weather event.

[@CaptainG-xs3yo]

So I'm guessing you are Betting your children's lives on that. What do you get if you are right.... No change. If you are Wrong,.... You have just screwed your children. That's a bet only a Fool would make.

[@anthonymorris5084]

@@CaptainG-xs3yo This is absurd logic. All climate policies come with consequences. Serious consequences. Mostly impoverishment. The OP is also correct about the IPCC. There is no evidence of phenomenon called "extreme" weather. Weather has always been extreme and history didn't begin the day you were born.

[@CaptainG-xs3yo]

@@anthonymorris5084 This is nothing new, the scientists that were employed by Shell, Exon, Standard Oil... All predicted this. Lots of documents predicting exactly what is happening right now. Check it out. Google Climate Files I know there are a lot of different papers and documents, hundreds. It might be overwhelming. But do your children a favor.

[@robertpayne4033]

@@CaptainG-xs3yo - please tell us exactly how the children will be screwed; and, by how much more it will be screwed than by the governments' policies in this farce

[@anthonymorris5084]

@@CaptainG-xs3yo The science tells us that the Earth has warmed by around 1C over approximately 200 years. Fossil fuels emit CO2 and CO2 is one of many greenhouse gases. That's it. This is all "science" is claiming. The rest is all wild hyperbolic speculations of future events that never materialize. All driven by climate activists and media who continuously misrepresent the science. The science predicted warming, and it's warmer. Life flourishes under warming.

[@towzone]

It’s amazing how people who don’t understand science try to use science to discredit science.

[@OldScientist]

Between 1961 and 2021 global cereal production increased 250% and cereal yield increased over 200%. Land used for cereal hardly increased (Data from World Bank, FAO/UN). This is the only time in human history that you are more likely to be overfed rather than underfed. We should be thankful we were borne into an age of such abundance. A US DoE study (Taylor & Schlenker, 2021) estimated that a 1 ppm increase in CO2 led to an increase of 0.4%, 0.6% and 1% in yield for corn, soybeans and wheat, respectively, and that CO2 increase was the main driver of the 500% yield growth in corn since 1940. Global tomato production has set a record each year for the past 10 years. Banana production has doubled in 20 years. All 10 of the largest sugar crops in global history occurred during the past 10 years. All 10 of the 10 largest rice crop years occurred during the past 10 years (UNFAO). 2023 was another record cereal crop.

[@parrisgjerde9212]

500% yield in corn yield due to increase in CO2 is patently untrue! In fact, it’s been demonstrated that corn is adapted to the CO2 levels of the pre-industrial environment and cannot take advantage of extra CO2.

[@OldScientist]

@parrisgjerde9212 Why don't you follow the sources I have referenced, and/or provide some references to support your position?

[@OldScientist]

@parrisgjerde9212 Try these for size: The Earth has greened by 15% or more in a human lifetime. "The greening of the planet over the last two decades represents an increase in leaf area on plants and trees equivalent to the area covered by all the Amazon rainforests. There are now more than two million square miles of extra green leaf area per year"(NASA, 2019). Observations of Earth’s vegetative cover since the year 2000 by NASA’s Terra satellite show a 10% increase in vegetation in the first 20 years of the century. Global tree canopy cover increased by 2.24 million square kilometers (865,000 square miles) between 1982 and 2016 (Nature, 2018). As well as human intervention, the reasons for this include forests expanding polewards aided by additional CO2 and a slight rise in temperature. Increased CO2 causes this in two ways: it has a direct fertilising effect (the CFE), and it increases drought tolerance by reducing stomata. This greening of the Earth due to CO2 is now "an indisputable fact" (Chen et al, 2024). In fact, 55.15% of those areas greening have been doing so at an accelerated rate since 2001. Since the start of the Industrial Revolution the Earth's primary productivity has increased by more than 30% (Campbell et al, 2017 and Haverd et al, 2020).

[@NhuNguyen-tz2nx]

it’s happening intensely in ASIA right now

[@raphlvlogs271]

once again it is neither the strongest nor the most intelligent that will survive it is those that can adapt

[@ceeemm1901]

And those who can punctuate and use CAPITAL letters!!!

[@Caragai]

​@@ceeemm1901 meet you in 2050's

[@Resource.Management]

It can't be denied but people do or people think it's just a natural phenomenon.

[@JohnSmith-k1x]

The last mini ice age recorded almost the exact conditions we are have today and for the past 10 or more years, If you know anything you understand that extreme climate conditions are just starting and will continue to get worse as time moves forward. And the home the U.S. is currently building will never withstand these escalating climate events. To put this in perspective the last mini ice age (or extreme cold spell ) 1st one started around 1660, and the 2nd one started around 1770 and lasted until 1850 according to the Wikipedia page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age And it will happen again and when it does the world will not be able to grow food on land or even live on land, but will need to live under ground until this period ends

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

The Little ice Age dropped global temperature by an AVERAGE of about 1.1 F. There were pockets or regions that experienced double this amount of cooling but it was never synchronously cold around the world. Mimimum temperatures happened at different times for different places. The minimums hit the eastern Pacific during the 15th century, northwestern Europe and southeastern North America during the 17th century, and most remaining regions during the mid-19th century. A 1-2 degree drop in global temperatures is not going to kill us or prevent us from farming. A full blown Ice Age, by contrast, can drop global temperature 4-8C, and that would indeed get us into trouble. But nobody is forecasting a full-blown reglaciation like that. The next major reglaciation, in fact, isn't expected for about 100,000 years.

[@JohnSmith-k1x]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 Well you maybe correct or someone else maybe correct only time will tell with the limited information along with forecasting this next climate disaster, But one thing is for sure our planet will cool around 2050 when the earth starts an elliptical orbit along with the earths axis tilting away for our sun, NASA & NOAA have already determined this to be fact, But no one can determine just how this event will effect the planet. Only time will tell what will happen. My advice to all is humanity has time to prepare for this event and if it's effects are minimum then we have no issues, but if the effects create what experts are saying it will, then it is better to be prepared then not to be. I thank you for your response it gives all of us a lot to think about and gives us all time to make the right choices for our families. Thank you again

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@JohnSmith-k1x You're referring to Milankovitch cycles, which are already in cooling phases and have been for centuries. Milankovitch Cycles work on huge timescales, so we'll be feeling exactly nothing but more warming when 2050 arrives. Greenhouse gases easily overpower Milankovitch Cycles. Earth's orbital eccentricity progresses over a period of 100,000 years, and its current status should be COOLING the earth, not warming it. Ditto axial tilt, which is at about 23.4 degrees, or about halfway between its extremes, and this angle is very slowly decreasing in a cycle that spans 41000 years. We're talking about less than a degree of temperature change every thousand years or so. This is not what you should be worried about, especially when our emissions have short-circuited this normal process of change.

[@cityofwelland634]

Excellent video

[@OldScientist]

Sea level appears to be rising at a small 3mm per year. Atolls in the Pacific nations of the Marshall Islands and Kiribati, as well as the Maldives archipelago in the Indian Ocean, have risen up to 8 percent in size (Ford and Kench, 2020). 89% of the globe’s islands and 100% of large islands have stable or growing coasts (Duvat, 2019). No island larger than 10ha decreased in size. As regards NOAA tide gauge data, let's look at some examples from around the world. N.B. All sites show a linear Relative Sea Level Trend: Kanmen, China 2.40mm/yr; Sydney, Australia 0.75mm/yr; Ferandina Beach, Florida 2.20mm/yr; Los Angeles, California 1.04mm/yr; Mera, Japan 3.8mm; Cascais, Portugal 1.32mm/yr; Newlyn, UK 1.94mm/yr. Jevrejeva, et al (2014) estimated 2 mm/year (± 0.3), and Church and White (2006) estimated 1.7mm/year (± 0.3). So that's a total rise of between 126 and 151mm (less than 6 inches) from 2024 to the end of the century. Or try PSMSL data: Kwajalein (Marshall Islands) 1.95mm/yr; Maldives (Indian Ocean) 3.21mm/yr; Lautoka (Fiji Islands, Pacific Ocean) 3.50mm/yr; Port Elisabeth (South Africa) 2.34mm/yr. Remember, all linear over many decades, or more than a century. Anyway, if you prefer satellite data NOAA's trend was +3.0mm/year Global Mean Sea Level (1993-2022), again linear last time I looked for each set of satellite data (but hey, it may have accelerated in the last month). NASA satellite data (1993-present) for Global Mean Sea Level shows a rise of 3.3mm per year. That's the same as two stacked penny coins. There is no relationship to the exponential increase in CO2 in the atmosphere. It's going to be decades before even your big toe is submerged.

[@robertmarmaduke186]

Increase in CO2 is not really 'exponential' and certainly not in any case from the Western nations. IEA published fossil fuel data show the meager 3% contribution from humans is mostly India/China, the rest is terrestrial or insects or rotting soil and would still continue to increase CO2 levels at 97% as fast if humans ceased to exist. _"The sweater chewing Luddite and the cud-chewing cow, are remarkably alike, yet different somehow. Ahh yes, I remember it now, the intelligent look on the face of the cow!"_ Peter Torbay

[@STAR-BIJUS1]

Em poucos anos o recomeço vai começar sem parar. E vão precisar pensar muito antes . Não pode ter erros biosistêmicos nas tecnologias . O planejamento estratégico tem que ser exato. E a execução de obras precisa ocorrer sem falhas . Não é uma tarefa para fazer "remendos ou quebra galhos" ( obras que dao defeitos e problemas ) . Vão precisar desmanchar cidades aos poucos e fazer outro tipo de infra estrutura de cidades. E depois construir nelas para morar. Acabar com a " encrenca " ( problemas da Terra ) no jogo da bola.

[@wayawolf-ox8zp]

If it repeated the winds speak if it's uploaded then just observe pulse many can't hear

[@bobincilgerran]

Micheal Mann says if we stop the emissions the warming will stop. Hanson says there would be a delay..

[@EfbyEye]

If only greedy governments around the globe listened to scientists when I first heard about global warming in the early 80’s!!!

[@CaptainG-xs3yo]

Reagan... Voting for Republicans. That's been a problem. Stupid people voting against their own interests.

[@someguy2135]

The single most effective way to reduce your impact on the environment is to switch to a plant-based diet

[@duanecarroll8255]

Plant based transportation!

[@someguy2135]

@@duanecarroll8255 the United Nations reported that animal agriculture produces more greenhouse gases then combining all transportation

[@bill8985]

The single most effective way to reduce your impact is to have fewer children. Full stop.

[@duanecarroll8255]

@@someguy2135 Are we feeding livestock crude oil?

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

​@@bill8985no

[@marklavoine8502]

The worst Storm was in the 1770s estimated 20 million killed I don't think you can blame oil

[@volkerengels5298]

"This is the fastest climate change in earth history." (IPCC 2019 Special Report) Events like these usually leads to mass extinction -> more than 75% of all species go extinct. The big mammal human might be an exception. Our tech like AC and nukes probably helps us out.

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

Nukes doesn't help and for a you need energy but from where?

[@volkerengels5298]

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 "This is the fastest climate ch....." is a death sentence for big mammals. The AC+Nuke shit - is just sarcasm

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

@@volkerengels5298 what is going on with you?

[@volkerengels5298]

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 "This is the fastest climate ch....." - is the important part. If you have questions...

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

@@volkerengels5298 yes it's a pretty fast climate change. When the dinosaur was dying it was much faster but it wasn't because of the climate change

[@andreasfehlau4965]

The Star way Project as I already have commented on my Facebook side or opening the fifth dimension for all. That should solve the problem, but it also means we have to all work together. What! you don't believe me, then refute the 1.0 experiment? But I understand, unprovability is the way THEY make their money.

[@micklee7018]

You haven't seen anything yet. Our poles are on the move and the magnetosphere is weakening rapidly. The sun is accumalating dust from the galactic spiral arm which will cause it to micronova maybe in the 2030s or 40s. All a part of the 12000 year disaster cycle. We have the jovians just starting there alignment culminating in September giving our solar system a second toroidal magnetic field this leaves us in front of the sun with all the other planets behind us. We have mass movement of fighting age males out of Africa. Mass immigration into Europe and North America. The Bricks nations are getting stronger everyday and their currancy is back by gold. Western countries are likely to see hyper inflation. The above is just the tip of a extremely corrupt iceberg We live in a very dangerous world. Buckle up buttercups it going to get very rough very soon.

[@karlwheatley1244]

No, thousands of research studies prove that our emissions caused ~98% of global warming since 1900. It has nothing to do with those other factors you listed.

[@onlyone2948]

Big 1993 floods of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers made the news.

[@raphlvlogs271]

global issues and trends will always be affecting different parts of the world differently

[@ceeemm1901]

...deep.....

[@rogermartinez78]

Burning fossil fuels is not cost free my friends, whether we burn it in our cars or power plants, we need to transition away from fossil fuels as quickly as possible. Don’t let the legacy car companies fool you, I am talking about you, Toyota.

[@rdallas81]

Cat 4 headed toward Cuba.

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

I heard it in the news. Looks horrible

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

@@HeavyMetal45 not funny

[@BitcoinNewsTodayLive]

The Environmental Effects Of “Our Planet” Thinking On Climate Change

[@rondlebreeden4175]

Nothing you do will stop nature doing what it does for millions of years. The earth has been going back and forth, warming and cooling for millions of years.

[@jimrutzler730]

This is not nature. This is greedy humans destroying the amazing world we have because they want more money. They don't care if billions die as long as their profits keep coming in.

[@CaptainG-xs3yo]

Right,.... Before, it took thousands of years... Now it's happening in just a couple hundred years... Sure Thing, keep paying for disasters while giving oil industry tax breaks.

[@anthonymorris5084]

@@jimrutzler730 Thanks for proving that this is all about socialism. What you call greedy, most normal people call drive and ambition. Next time you're offered a raise at work or receive more money from a promotion I'm guessing you'll refuse it like the non greedy environmentalist that you are.

[@rubylicious1024]

​@@anthonymorris5084with that, you seemingly have a strange type of translation, interpretation or logic🤔, but sure greed can be everywhere, and be in different stages.. at least I don't think, what was written, was directed towards common people, mostly due to the simple reason, that they aren't the ones benefiting from it.. that's the rich, businesses, corporations and such that does..

[@anthonymorris5084]

@@rubylicious1024 Socialists call anybody who is successful or wealthy "greedy". I've heard this a thousand times. I've never met a greedy person in my entire life. Greed is a Leftist epithet that is hurled incessantly at rich people. It's an anti capitalist trope. These rich people and their corporations provide you with all of the products and services that you love and enjoy. That's how they got rich. They also provide billions of jobs. Profits are in direct correlation with the success of the product. The wealthier a person becomes, the greater the positive impact on society. Steve Jobs got rich because people line up to obtain his products.

[@gamingtonight1526]

The pot on the hob is the planet, the water in the pot, that is getting hotter and hotter is the climate crisis, and all those frogs, sitting in that slowly boiling water? That's humanity! The last year they quoted was 2019 though, so how old is this video?!

[@MaggieJohnson-vn6su]

You cut the woman out of climate science history. Eunice Newton Foot did what Tyndall did FIRST.

[@codyjones1098]

Nothin YOU do matters now! ITs far too late for most of us.

[@glennmccudden8574]

Yes we are cactus. The elites And governments who.dont Care they'll die to. But money And greed comes first greedy Companies polluting water. River seas. Plastic man worse Pollutant. In us sea food. Oceans. Fish eat the micro Plastic . Birds eat it killing There own baby's. Man is Mans worst enemy. Cheers

[@ceeemm1901]

...and again, Eunice Foote 1856, doesn't get a guernsey. Oh, that's right! As she was back then..."she'a just a chick, what would she know?"

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

That is your opinion I think that she did great but not really much understood it until now

[@melusine826]

Eunice Foote

[@margaretwebb389]

It’s tooooo late! Build infrastructure

[@muhammad-bin-american]

I say pray...a lot.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

So pretend that praying actually does something?

[@muhammad-bin-american]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 🤣

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@muhammad-bin-american If you contract cancer, which would you prefer: chemotherapy or prayer? If you could choose only one, which would it be?

[@muhammad-bin-american]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 🤣🤣🤣I say praying to Jehovah is always needed. He makes miracles all the time. You can try it and you will be surprised.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@muhammad-bin-american Jehovah makes miracles all the time? Where was he when 6 million Jews prayed to be saved from the Holocaust and were gassed to death? Where was he durng the rape of Nanking? Where was he when Joseph Stalin killed millions of his own people? Where is he today with the slaughter-fest in Ukraine and Gaza? Why do babies and children get bone cancer and die? Why are there over 2000 diseases that can kill us at any given time? Why must living organisms have to slaughter and consume other living organisms in order to survive? What kind of a compassionate god designs a world like this? You're fooling yourself with selective observation. Millions of tragedies take place every day on this earth and you look the other way and dismiss it with the inane "God works in mysterious ways" excuse.

[@Timothy-remembers]

Keep on driving- convenience is so worth it-

[@grmpEqweer]

In a lot of cities, for a lot of people, there isn't good public transportation. I don't have access to it at all, but if I did, it wouldn't work most of the time with my erratic work schedule. If I got off work at 12 am (often), the whole system would be shut down. I can't bicycle 30 miles one way. ... Having a good public transportation system would be VERY useful for me, if it was there. And no, I can't afford to move.

[@Darin970]

The Earth's tilt shifting closer to the Sun is the major cause of climate change. 🙂😇

[@robm6803]

No. It’s the lizard people!!1! 🙈

[@karlwheatley1244]

No, thousands of research studies prove that our emissions caused ~98% of global warming since 1900.

[@davidm9214]

Only thing we can do is tell developing countries to stay 3rd world. Good luck with that😂 🎉

[@surfskate3]

It's not emissions so much it the amount of people and land use for them food housing travel

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

Wrong!!!!! It's all about emissions

[@jthomashair]

Yes, those things... because they lead to more emissions.

[@HeavyMetal45]

Are you willing to be “one less”? If not then how can you say there are too many people?

[@onlyone2948]

In the 1960s, overpopulation was a concern.

[@onlyone2948]

In 2005, I was expected to die of natural causes. If I had it my way, I would have been allowed to die, but my unconscious body was found and taken to the hospital. I have been a United States citizen all my life. Western men are much too wimpy. 😆🤣

[@Philip-x3d]

thats right folks........the world has NEVER seen any floods EVER before. 🤣

[@1hitwoon99]

low IQ Bob

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

We're seeing substantially more extreme precipitation events, according to the EPA and IPCC data. It makes perfect scientific sense. Every degree of temperature rise allows the air to hold an additional 7% of moisture. That's creating more and larger atmospheric rivers, which are producing Biblical downpours much more often.

[@Philip-x3d]

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 where was that 7% obtained from ? Iceland ? Peru ? NZ ? Be very wary of global average claims.

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

@@Philip-x3d It has nothing to do with location. It's a well-known law of thermodynamics. See the Clausius-Clapeyron equation.

[@Philip-x3d]

@@slevinchannel7589 do you speak English ? Sorry - cant decide what you are trying to say here ? All I did was make a sarcastic remark.........that someone seems amazed at some strange event...called a flood !!! Like there had never been a flood before and we all need to panic. It was "constructive" as it was saying there is NO NEED to panic.

[@lokin4truth]

Baloney!

[@nativespiritindian8278]

the planet blue kachina is here again

[@dp-kz5cs]

You still pushing that agenda ? So adorable . What makes you think ,operative word, we can stop this 😂😂😂 deal and adjust and most importantly PREPARE TO PROTECT. Thats all you can do !

[@dp-kz5cs]

Well its 2024 , my state is now in a state of emergency from drought, which I've BEEN saying , but you wouldnt think wva could be in a drought huh? Think of all the coal under our feet that will make centralia look like a camp fire . That's my fear tbh . Godbless all ❤

[@seanreid349]

These scientist are off by 30yrs

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

Why?

[@stigsrnning6459]

​@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 In the future the scientists will know they recommended the whole thing backwards. First of all that excluding every car that emits water vapor (by burning fossil fuels) caused both draught and flood. Without enough vegetation (trees, bushes...) for transpiration at different heights the catastrophe were a fact. The relative humidity over both land and sea has been lower and lower for decades now. See on internet the "humidity paradox".

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

@@stigsrnning6459 no. fossil fuel emits co2 and other gases such as water/steam. co2 is heating up the earth

[@An-dromedra.]

Green house affects

[@musicalhost5755]

Ai papi! El fin del mundo!

[@someguy2135]

To paraphrase George Carlin- The planet will live forever. Humans the other hand, will not. Especially if we don't change significantly and soon.

[@tonybochiano]

😂

[@louisveerapen4589]

What climate change? Isn't it a bit late for that, read the Bible instead, it explains the time we are living now,

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

The Bible explains everything? The same Bible that tells us God drowned everyone on earth except for Noah and his clan? The same Bible that tells us to stone to death homosexuals, people who worship other gods, children who talk back to us and old men who collect wood on the Sabbath? Hmmmmm.

[@tylerlormand5644]

ya bible is book of fairy tales ...........fats over rule faith

[@tylerlormand5644]

facts

[@karlwheatley1244]

"What climate change?" You must not be a farmer, gardener, skier, or someone who follows trustworthy news channels of science to not know about man-made global warming and climate disruption. The ski season is not 4-5 weeks shorter than it was in 1980 because our emissions are currently warming the planet ~20 times faster than it usually warms when coming out of an ice age/glaciation period. That rate of warming is lethally fast and at least half of plant and animal species are trying to move to someplace cooler. Many species will fail to find new places to live that are both as cool as where they used to live had been and that have the other things they need to survive and thrive.

[@pauls7317]

Nope

[@ionymous6733]

Smell smoke in your house. Could it be a fire? "Nope. Go back to sleep." If right: No wasted effort. If wrong: Lost house, life, family. "Maybe/Yep. Take action." If right: Save house, life, family. If wrong: Wasted effort. "Nope" is the only option with dire consequences.

[@momzilla9491]

@@ionymous6733 I watched a simple experiment with a transparent Water Tank on a movable leveller years ago here on YT. Looked for it really hard last summer, but it's gone. The demonstration proved that an Oil Spill could stop and even reverse the current. Don't be so quick to think it's Up There, when it may be Down There. Which scenario do you think could pull the greatest amount of Tax Dollars from our pockets?

[@worzi3]

@@ionymous6733 Better safe than sorry!

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

Ignoring facts will kill you

[@phackqu]

The sun is in a solar maximum.

[@duanecarroll8255]

Please publish your amazing research on this subject, and get a NOBEL PRIZE!

[@amilias1000]

That cycle happens every 11 years. Not the problem.

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

No

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

​@@amilias1000you mean the sun cycle?

[@Me97202]

Trillions of tons of co2 released every year. You don’t think that’s maybe a factor?

[@bobsthea]

cool, finally we al can get rid off that pesky snow and headed to hot beach more often

[@ceeemm1901]

And watch the climate refugees come ashore, haha.

[@jeffreyburkins5334]

Uh, the ocean is gonna claim the coast. No beach. No beach houses.

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

Yeah did you even understand just a bit what the problem is?

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

​@@ceeemm1901I think that there will be so much that they can walk over the water with all the dead bodies underneath 😢😢😢

[@davidfromamerica1871]

Wait when the Skyscrapers start falling down..😄

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

Funny?? what is wrong with you?

[@davidfromamerica1871]

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Over active imagination.😀

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

@@davidfromamerica1871 you know that drugs aren't good for the human body and brain

[@davidfromamerica1871]

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 That is not what my psychiatrist tells me.🥸 Psychiatric medication for schizophrenia.😵‍💫😍😎👍

[@jimanderson2518]

All B.S. All B.S. ALL B.S.

[@Bushman9]

Wild the way they made all those fake videos.

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

​@@Bushman9they can proof what they are saying

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

It's no BS!!!

[@jthomashair]

Literally a child putting your fingers in your ears and closing your eyes

[@Bushman9]

@@jthomashair Sadly though, this “child” can vote.

[@J.M.-nb4gw]

Nice video but they are way off in their predictions, we will see total ecological and economic collapse within the next 10 years due to exponential increase in global temperatures and extreme climate change 😢

[@jamemswright3044]

Where are these prophecies recorded?

[@bionicman1921]

The earth will be uninhabitable by the year 2060

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

Some parts yes

[@seitanbeatsyourmeat666]

And there are people trying to extend lifespan to 120. Why

[@weelebaseknowles4410]

Only about 40% of the world would be displaced and only about at least 30% less food would be made

[@imtheeastgermanguy5431]

@@weelebaseknowles4410 "only" billions of humans won't be able to live in those areas

[@chrisoneill3479]

Increased volcanic activity as promised in the Bible

[@swiftlytiltingplanet8481]

There is no increase in volcanic activity now. The Bible also said the world was flat and that stars were the size of figs. We really don't want to get our science from what men from 3000 years ago wrote.

[@danhove]

How about global warming

[@larragunn2809]

😂 timeline is a little off

[@hanailee7560]

💭8