As an aussie Air Force brat, I used to watch the USAF U2's taking off in the late 1950's when a squadron was stationed down in Australia doing 'weather' recon missions from the base I lived on. Amazing plane.
@jeffreyhill10113 жыл бұрын
Yeah doing recon on "weather or not" the Soviets were up to something new
@kwhp15073 жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyhill1011 it ain’t just the soviets they was “watching”
@jeffreyhill10113 жыл бұрын
@@kwhp1507 correct. My comment was essentially just playing off the joke OP used with weather surveillance.
@gaestroorly46683 жыл бұрын
I believe they do their 'mission' in indonesia 😂
@Barefoot_Joe3 жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyhill1011 That one flew by unoticed way above his head ;)
@faenrir113 жыл бұрын
It flies because it still hasn't found what it's looking for.
@johnladuke64753 жыл бұрын
It refuses to land until we forgive Africa's debts.
@RCAvhstape3 жыл бұрын
You win the internet for today, sir! (Now get your coat)
@arricammarques19553 жыл бұрын
@@RCAvhstape 'It still hasn't spied what it's snooping for'
@RedLP5000S3 жыл бұрын
I see what you did there. ;)
@RCAvhstape3 жыл бұрын
@@RedLP5000S The U2 camera sees it too. It sees everything.
@richardbrayshaw5703 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. I had no idea there was a later, larger version of the U2.
@hokutoulrik73453 жыл бұрын
Same here. I thought they just upgraded the original airframes.
@SonKunSama3 жыл бұрын
Yeah with Bono reaching an astonishing 460 courics
@garethwigglesworth81873 жыл бұрын
I like my junk food what can I say, No need to be rude. I do my best cosplay when I sing with or without you.
@grumbazor3 жыл бұрын
@@SonKunSama YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH!!!!
@ridhosamudro21993 жыл бұрын
You have no idea? Isn't that the point?
@BlackEpyon3 жыл бұрын
As per the old adage: "If it ain't broke, just keep fixing it until it is."
@thomas3163 жыл бұрын
Might be useful to take the pilot out of the cockpit, we don't want another Gary Powers incident if one is shot down. 🤔
@reallyhappenings55973 жыл бұрын
Works on your car too!
@Netherlands0313 жыл бұрын
How is this applicable?
@BlackEpyon3 жыл бұрын
@@Netherlands031 It's like an old appliance. They're sturdy and reliable, so you just keep fixing them until you can't get parts for them any more. Alternatively, the adage could be talking about an incompetent designer (or management) who keeps trying to reinvent the wheel to be more complex and prone to breakage, when the old one works just fine.
@caminstol24733 жыл бұрын
@@thomas316 it may be hackable unless they fly a destined flight plan. even so, it wouldnt be possible to change course on the way there. i think a pilot would be much better suited
@casualsleepingdragon85013 жыл бұрын
Sr-71: *flies over USSR* The titanium in it fuselage: I'm on my way! I'm on my way! Home sweet home!
@FriedHam3 жыл бұрын
It's *our* way.
@NikolajHansen3 жыл бұрын
There is a 170ish DC3s still flying commercially today. 80 years old and without an airforce to maintain them. That's even more impressive.
@RidinDirtyRollinBurnouts3 жыл бұрын
The DC3 was one of the most popular planes in its era and is probably the most popular pre-war aircraft still flying. So there is a market for keeping up these planes.
@RCAvhstape3 жыл бұрын
A near perfect design. There's a saying, "The only thing that can replace a DC-3 is another DC-3." Over the years there have been lots of upgrades for the old DC-3's avionics, of course, but also re-engine jobs. I remember seeing an ad in a 1980s edition of Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine for a company offering to put turboprops on your DC-3. But anything that makes it less simple and harder to work on is almost a downgrade.
@panther1053 жыл бұрын
There have been discussions going on that with all the re-engining of these DC-3s with turboprops and the massive financial investments needed to do so....these could become the first commercial aircraft to reach a service life of ONE CENTURY.,!!
@peterkuykendall36363 жыл бұрын
@@RCAvhstape I would expect a turbo prop to be simpler and therefore more reliable. But of course the large initial capital investment would be a deterrent.
@jackee-is-silent29383 жыл бұрын
A re-engineered DC-3 could even be better with minimal improvements like non-riveted hull. As others have mentioned, the big issue is making a whole new aircraft as opposed to just keeping the existing ones flying.
@not0l1453 жыл бұрын
this plane is so good that it downloaded an album for me without me asking
@aaronmcculloch83263 жыл бұрын
that's what makes it such an effective spyplane!
@beroth13 жыл бұрын
The A-12 was actually under development well before Powers was shot down. Kelly Johnson anticipated the U-2's vulnerability in the late 1950s and began a successor capable of Mach 3. Luckily by 1960 the development was well underway and the A-12 first flew only 2 years after the U-2 incident (which is unheard of in aircraft development timelines).
@ceddricc59093 жыл бұрын
That's actually very impressive
@HuntingTarg2 жыл бұрын
@@ceddricc5909 Prescient engineering.
@ricardosplace3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for listening Droid! A U-2 episode was way overdue!
@negativeindustrial3 жыл бұрын
Seriously. I actually learned some shit on this one! I had no idea they had a modern version. Still unclear why it’s not a U-3 considering how extensively modified it is from the original.
@JonatasAdoM3 жыл бұрын
@@negativeindustrial U-2.5?
@andrewschulze38653 жыл бұрын
My great grandfather worked for the NSA and one of his jobs was to view these photos from the U2 and Sr-71 blackbird
@astro24933 жыл бұрын
How clear was the photos your dad view?
@rebeccadande21573 жыл бұрын
@@astro2493 The film is about the size of a piece of printer paper. From over 70,000 feet altitude, the camera could resolve separate objects that were only 8 inches apart. The camera is extremely impressive.
@deusexaethera3 жыл бұрын
Your _great-grandfather??_ My grandfather was born in 1922 and was entering middle-age when the U2 was first deployed. How young does your family have children that you've managed to pack 2 extra generations into the past 100 years?
@astro24933 жыл бұрын
@@rebeccadande2157 that's pretty amazing for the technology at that time
@andrewschulze38653 жыл бұрын
@@deusexaethera Mom was 24 my dad was 26, and my great grandfather was 82 when he passed I was super fortunate to meet him and spen my days growing up with him, still miss him and its been 2 years
@whall61013 жыл бұрын
"Why is the U2 still flying?" It's doing even more than the job that it was designed to do because of the genius of Kelly Johnson and his team.
@jamese92833 жыл бұрын
You are looking for a hero. Impossible for KJ to see 65+ years into the future. Current U2 is mostly new design. More happenstance than genius.
@jeshkam3 жыл бұрын
@@jamese9283 Are you a Russian troll by chance?
@jamese92833 жыл бұрын
@@jeshkam No, but my Dad's wife is Ukrainian. Does that count?
@jeshkam3 жыл бұрын
@@jamese9283 Could do.
@whall61013 жыл бұрын
@@jamese9283 All engineers stand on the shoulders of those who came before. Kelly Johnson did that better than most and those engineers who worked on his designs did it better, too. Sounds like you work for Boeing!
@GB-vn1tf3 жыл бұрын
It's insane that it has survived, especially as it was designed as a short term solution as they knew it would get shot down eventually, so they made its successor that came and went along with the satellites that still cannot do what the U2 does. It's more or less a starfighter with big wings, Kelly knew how to make aircraft.
@Moshe_Dayan443 жыл бұрын
Kelly Johnson was just one of those people who had a gift for design. He was the engineer who gave the US (and the world) its first 400MPH (level flight) fighter, the Lockheed P-38 Lightening. Incredibly, Johnson was equally adept at designing supersonic aircraft, including the U2, the F104 Starfighter (still an INSANE looking aircraft, every time I look at it!) and the legendary SR71 Blackbird. He designed the U2 so well for what it was meant to do, that the best we can come up with today, 60 years later, is an enlarged, electronically updated version of the same air frame.
@johnwales56863 жыл бұрын
We should not forget the very fast time from starting design to a flying aircraft. The timescales today are massive. Most og KJ's projects were delivered on time and in budget something unheard of today. Todays complexity comes at a very high price. We need a few KJ's to get todays complexity under control and produce workable solutions that are affordable and will last. Great video as usual.
@ivanlagrossemoule3 жыл бұрын
@@johnwales5686 "affordable and will last" Yeah, no. This whole video explains why this is dumb. The U-2 wasn't able to spy over the Soviet Union anymore, it only lasted because the airframe was good enough for other uses. Without the complex and expensive SR-71, there would've been no spying until satellites took over. For certain very demanding roles, complexity and cost can't be avoided. But once those aircraft aren't needed for that role anymore, they get scrapped because they're complex and expensive. It doesn't mean they weren't necessary or good at their jobs. Also the complexity and price of modern aircraft has drastically increased because the list of requirements gets longer the more technology we have. There's no way around that currently.
@CorePathway Жыл бұрын
F-104 lawn dart isn’t much to brag about
@thegalli3 жыл бұрын
I live 4 miles from the runway at Beale AFB, home of the U2. They fly so low over my house they shake my windows.
@arthas6403 жыл бұрын
I know how you feel, i live near a joint military base (army and air force) and they like to send helicopters buzzing just above the treeline even through residential areas on a regular basis. Planes dont often fly extremely low but they do on occasion. It can really irritating when you're outside talking to someone and get deafened because some ass hat wants to reenact an action movie and buzz across the forest and suburbs as low as possible.
@kimjong-un28303 жыл бұрын
@@arthas640 i live right next to a royal Australian Airforce base , every day and night we have F18 super hornets F35's taking off n landing ..... the noise gets alot worse when they have war games going ..... does not really bother me knowing this is a small inconvenience to protect my country and its freedoms
@mclarkson783 жыл бұрын
Have you ever seen SR-71s coming and going? Now that is a plane I wish I could have experienced in person.
@loboheeler3 жыл бұрын
Yep, you can often see the U-2s doing landing practice at Beal AFB for pilot qualification. The flight path goes over one of the roads going past the base. Beal was also a main base for the SR-71, and there is one on display there. .
@brucesmith42453 жыл бұрын
@@mclarkson78 Spent about 10 Years working on the navigation system on the SR-71,and about 9 on the U-2.
@connorjohnson78343 жыл бұрын
Back in the age of sail, technology was advancing at a rate that a large warship could be a viable fighting unit for nearly 100 years providing it's maintained probably. It's quite crazy to think we've gotten to a point again where certain weapon systems can still be viable 100 years after first being created
@rockzs74r3 жыл бұрын
The plane is so cool that it have Muscle Cars as landing gears
@bigblue69173 жыл бұрын
Imagine having that job. Chasing a U-2 in a muscle car. Talk about bragging rights.
@laa0fa5023 жыл бұрын
@@bigblue6917 both guys are generally other u-2 pilots. Talk about a job perk
@brokeandtired3 жыл бұрын
Well its still in use because it can loiter for ages and they already own it. So basically its free now the money has already been spent.
@RidinDirtyRollinBurnouts3 жыл бұрын
@@brokeandtired there is definitely still money being spent on these planes so they're not free. They are however, tried and true designs so in that regard, the cost of R&D for an existing airframe is 0.
@RCAvhstape3 жыл бұрын
And the SR-71 is so cool it needs muscle car V8 engines to start up its own jets.
@DaveNarn3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the U2 coverage. The Dragon Lady is a yoke and rudder, tail dragger that would never be approved today. The pilots get a real workout landing it. There are all volunteers from heavies to fighters with the required command experience. Half wash out of the demanding training program. Sometimes because they just can't land it.
@Chicken_Wing913 жыл бұрын
The c-130 is another one that’s gonna keep going way into the future.
@qwattyeet40273 жыл бұрын
If it works it works
@greenkerbal6323 жыл бұрын
@@qwattyeet4027 PLANE IS PLANE
@Chicken_Wing913 жыл бұрын
@@qwattyeet4027 I’m not complaining i live near Eglin AFB always hear them practicing the AC-130 would feel wrong not hearing the hum of those engines
@qwattyeet40273 жыл бұрын
@@Chicken_Wing91 ok
@Chicken_Wing913 жыл бұрын
@@qwattyeet4027 yep
@viktorpedia3 жыл бұрын
This channel is awsome. All the vintage videoclips and the great information, just love it.
@rogerfroud3003 жыл бұрын
Probably the most interesting, well researched and presented channels on KZbin. Superb content as always.
@HuntingTarg2 жыл бұрын
I'd put Mustard up against him. Granted Mustard uses CGI more than archive footage.
@mlevine20053 жыл бұрын
Paul, you've lost weight and you look great! Keep up the amazing work -- I love your videos!
@gregknipe87723 жыл бұрын
I wondered how I'd missed this production. then I looked at the posted date. thank you.
@carlamerritt4903 жыл бұрын
Your channel absolutely rocks in this format. Very detailed yet easy to follow. You have excellent "instructor" type way of speach.
@GoViking9333 жыл бұрын
This was a great episode: covered all the bases, explained the SR-71, lots of good footage (I really liked the part that shows how much larger it is and then the modular differences shortly afterwards. Really enjoyed this.
@astrokid75703 жыл бұрын
Paul Shilito just have the BEST shirt collection of the internet. Love it
@Coyote-wm5op3 жыл бұрын
My grandfather worked in intelligence for a while and learned how to analyze photos like that. It’s pretty crazy how you can scale the size of a missile on a truck and be able to identify what model and it’s capability.
@logicplague3 жыл бұрын
Operations Room did a video on Desert Storm a while back, I was shocked to find out they were still flying then.
@carso15003 жыл бұрын
Same here, i also learned that it's still flying thanks to that vídeo and i was also shocked that they are still flying
@glenmoss023 жыл бұрын
I live 5 miles from where the SR-71s were based at, Beale AFB in northern California. They've been long gone since their retirement back in the late 90s but the U2s are still here. I've lived in this area for almost 30 years but no matter how many times I've seen these beautiful aircraft flying overhead (usually several times each week) I can't help but pause and admire them.
@Yukikazehalo3 жыл бұрын
Another interesting factoid about the U-2 was that they were capable of operating off of aircraft carriers, a very unique ability that made mission routes much more flexible.
@stickman32143 жыл бұрын
There was 1 U-2 modified to land on aircraft carriers, which it only did a handful of times for testing
@panther1053 жыл бұрын
@@stickman3214 Ouch! Poor wings. Just wondering how much extra stress and sudden arrestor hook stop would cause.
@stickman32143 жыл бұрын
@@panther105 The airframe had to be quite heavily reinforced, which reduced the amount of fuel and payload that could be carried
@panther1053 жыл бұрын
@@stickman3214 Oh man.....That looks so dicey...!! kzbin.info/www/bejne/gmmrfoODjrFkb6c
@kudukilla3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, that was a real great idea: let’s take the most difficult plane to land, and try to bring it down on the most difficult place to land. It worked, but not practical.
@racerd96693 жыл бұрын
I still remember watching a U2 take off from Bien Hoa AB in 1968, with the 2 El,Camino chase trucks with airman in the back holding the wings up until the speed was up enough to lift the wings. I watched the pilot climb out and then start to corkscrew up, until you could not see him anymore. Awesome video Thank you, now can you do one on the WB57 series on spy plans.
@Timmycoo3 жыл бұрын
I've loved this plane ever since I saw James May go up in one and got to see just how high up they actually get. Also, I'm curious if the science portion of its use is high altitude weather mapping/monitoring? I'd think that'd be useful.
@bluebalute3 жыл бұрын
:) and don't forget James May's nose itch.
@Timmycoo3 жыл бұрын
@@bluebalute I felt that so hard. *literally itched my nose just thinking about it lol*
@YouKilledKenny4153 жыл бұрын
I thought that NASA used them (or at least they used to?) for weather/high altitude atmospheric monitoring?
@bluebalute3 жыл бұрын
@@YouKilledKenny415 They did/do.
@Timmycoo3 жыл бұрын
@@YouKilledKenny415 That's what I said. And I assume so! Makes sense no?
@TheGalacticEmperorOfLabels3 жыл бұрын
I had no idea there was a later version, let alone that they were still in use. Thanks, Paul.
@juliosanchez16143 жыл бұрын
I loved this guy in game of thrones, glad to still see him making great content.
@76Starship3 жыл бұрын
Well, dani got him near the end. :)
@cornbreadfedkirkpatrick96473 жыл бұрын
What? really I haven't gotten around to watch !!!!!! no way?
@matth73843 жыл бұрын
I once saw this man in a non-paisley shirt and I hated it!!!!! Love your show. Been here since day one and you never let yourself or this show and your fans down!!!! Keep up the great work.
@alanm34383 жыл бұрын
When I was in Korea, I saw one of these on the runway. I was stationed in Japan and I loved watching the SR71 take off. Both jets are incredible.
@RonnieBeck3 жыл бұрын
How anyone can give these videos a thumbs down is beyond me. They are well researched, well presented and the topics are well selected and interesting. This is yet another top class video! Love it!
@iconicshrubbery3 жыл бұрын
The thumbsdowners would be either the Soviets or the funky-shirt-haters...
@RonnieBeck3 жыл бұрын
@@iconicshrubbery best answer ever lol
@lukehoward34873 жыл бұрын
U2: “you still haven’t found what you’re looking for!”
@SimonHollandfilms3 жыл бұрын
good one Paul. the more i learn about signal intelligence, the more i realise how important the U2 still is.
@ianmacfarlane12413 жыл бұрын
Still iconic and beautiful - a huge man made albatross.
@BeKindToBirds3 жыл бұрын
And a great working bird too. Dragon Lady
@JonatasAdoM3 жыл бұрын
So long as it doesn't resamble a huge moth.
@SimonRaahauge19733 жыл бұрын
@@JonatasAdoM What were wrong wit the vulcan bomber? :oD
@DisasterxUs3 жыл бұрын
I was stationed at Osan Air Base, Korea 2015-2017. The U2's are awesome, and the sound they make when taking off is majestic.
@russellhueners84993 жыл бұрын
Camp Humphreys 1988-1990 guardrail tech, also worked both ends of Senior Stretch, Det 3 Akrotiri and ROFA at NSA. Flight test and cal with the U2 at AF Plant 42 Palmdale, same hangar with the big boy SR71.
@Shot_Gunner3 жыл бұрын
I think the U2 is a beautiful aircraft. Sleek and intimidating. Look great considering how old it truly is. Great video! 🤠
@msromike1233 жыл бұрын
Just when I thought, "Oh no, another U-2 vid." You made it quite fresh and interesting. Kudos.
@stephenmcbride63593 жыл бұрын
With the speed of military arms evolution being so fast in the 50's, it's not surprising they came across things that were evolutionary winners.
@paulmcneil99713 жыл бұрын
Don't forget NASA is also flying 3 of the WB57s, the US built version of the English Electric Canberra bomber / reconnaissance plane which first flew in 1950.
@DennisJohnsonDrummer2 жыл бұрын
Our family was stationed at McCoy A.F.B. in Orlando (1972-74) and this was the base for the U-2 Spy Plane. As a child I saw this lane fly over our house on many occassions. What a sight.
@MatSpeedle3 жыл бұрын
Just because somethings old, doesn't mean it's not usful and this proves that. Great to see this iconic craft still sails the skies!
@reconty21333 жыл бұрын
Saw one of these beautiful planes take off from Osan back in the late 80’s. They were called the Black Cats. They had Chevy Camero’s as chase cars the catch the detachable landing gears from the wings. So cool to watch.
@ShadowOppsRC3 жыл бұрын
Fyi JP7 and the blackbird was also used for cooling, and as hydraulic fluid as well. All thie ment the fuel had to have a extremly low vapor and neccessitated the fuel to be super hard to ignite. You could throw a lit match in and it would go out quickly.
@tz87853 жыл бұрын
As a consequence the Blackbird used triethylborane for engine and afterburner ignition - and AFAIK carried only enough for a quite limited number of ignitions.
@maxtorque22773 жыл бұрын
The most amazing thing about the U2 is actually just how quickly it was built and just how much of a lash up it actually is! With the first airframes built and delivered in less than 1 year, it used the existing fuselage of the Starfighter, with modified wings and low mass undercarriage. Basically, it carried over everything it could from existing products in the name of expiditing the design, development and build, using a lot of starfighter tooling and processes ij the process.
@MrTryAnotherOne3 жыл бұрын
Holy cow! The view up there must be phenomenal.
@cornbreadfedkirkpatrick96473 жыл бұрын
I have only flown commercially and it is it's been a very long time I still want to go back and take a nice flight somewhere even though I'm older
@RaquelFoster3 жыл бұрын
I grew up very close to the US Air Force Museum at Wright-Patterson. In the late '80s when I was 12 or 13 years old they had two SR-71s, an A-12/YF-12, an X-15, and the XB-70. All of those were out in the open. You could climb on them. You could play with the ball on the nose of the X-15. But what really fascinated me was the U-2. The U-2 was older than all of those planes but it was the one which was still classified and you couldn't even find a picture of it ANYWHERE. They barely even acknowledged it existed. It was super intriguing that the plane which got shot down and was supposedly replaced by the SR-71 was a big secret. I can play around inside the rotary bomb racks of a B-1, but I can't even see a U-2? It certainly convinced me that the U-2 was the important one. They even got two Keyhole/Hexagon satellites at the museum before they got a U-2.
@Predator42ID3 жыл бұрын
So, when will you cover the M2 browning? That thing hit its hundredth birthday this year and keeps on going.
@negativeindustrial3 жыл бұрын
That’s astonishing. Good idea for a video.
@johnladuke64753 жыл бұрын
If you just can't wait for Curious Droid to do it, check out Forgotten Weapons channel. Ian can show you an M2 inside and out while he tells you neat stories about the history and development.
@negativeindustrial3 жыл бұрын
@@johnladuke6475 Thanks! 👍
@johnladuke64753 жыл бұрын
@@negativeindustrial All praise be to Gun Jesus, for he shall read to us his Gunpowder Commandments from the Book of Armaments. Uploading firearms videos six days a week, and on the seventh day he rests.
@jeffreyhill10113 жыл бұрын
To be fair who wants to be the one to fire Ma? Besides she still does a stern talking to like few others.
@brianburke30492 жыл бұрын
used to work on u-2s in the USAF always cool to see them flying still!!! great video keep up the good work
@geraltmiral44823 жыл бұрын
Ofcourse Lord Varys the master of Whispers would be an expert on spy planes
@auggith3 жыл бұрын
i just saw you’ve hit 1m!! i’ve been here since 320 something thousand and it’s great to see how far you’ve come. your videos are amazing
@KaiseruSoze3 жыл бұрын
You used to be able to see them landing and taking off from Moffet Field in Mt. View, Calif.
@soaringvulture3 жыл бұрын
Yeah. I live near there. How long has it been since they stopped flying U-2's from Moffett?
@selfdo3 жыл бұрын
I might also point out that some Martin B-57 Canberra's, the "D" and "F" versions, were produced as a long-wingspan aircraft designed for high-altitude reconnaissance. My Dad flew in these on TDY to Vietnam in '65, '66', and '70.
@Darkstar_84733 жыл бұрын
Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird has got to be the most iconic/sexiest thing that ever flew.
@matthewhartup9413 жыл бұрын
Cool video. I worked on these in the USAF. It's unbelievable how much work goes into keeping these birds in the sky to perform the mission and bring the pilots home safe.
@MrJC13 жыл бұрын
Ah curious droid... you are legend. Dont ever forget it. Love these videos. Straight to the point, no bias, all fact. Brilliant delivery! As close to perfection as ya can get. 9/10. (10 can never truely be achieved so its really 9/9 🤣🤣🤣)
@MrJC13 жыл бұрын
@MichaelKingsfordGray huh?
@Man_Emperor_of_Mankind3 жыл бұрын
It always surprises me when I go to the USAF Museum and look at their U2 in person. The early version is a really small plane
@atomicskull64053 жыл бұрын
Don't forget the CH-47, it's planned to stay in the inventory until at least 2060.
@ekscalybur3 жыл бұрын
And still the fastest helicopter in the US Army inventory.
@BRMCaptChaos3 жыл бұрын
One flew over approx 1000ft agl this week in the Cotswolds. I had no idea they were still in service, but thanks for the refresh. She's a beaut.
@rexmann19843 жыл бұрын
Excellent intro. Love watching that crazy thing come down on bicycle wheels.
@ceeplusthree3 жыл бұрын
Because of continuous improvements and upgrades, the Dragon Lady is still the best tool for the job. Like a restomod muscle car, it only looks old on the outside, but is thoroughly modern where it counts.
@saranshgautam65513 жыл бұрын
Amazing content as always! Nice shirt xD
@corey22322 жыл бұрын
The SR-71 was a headache, but still such an insane piece of engineering. I know this video was about the U2, but it's insane to imagine flying something faster & higher than missiles meant to intercept it.
@HuntingTarg2 жыл бұрын
Did you ever watch "Firefox" starring Clint Eastwood? Imagine a spy thriller that revolves around a prototype aircraft and then suddenly turns into an action movie. It's actually very similar to "The Hunt for Red October".
@NapoleonDynamites3 жыл бұрын
6:57 One major issue the u2 had, I had my hand up guessing Bono 🙃 As always assume informative vid 👍
@SkyhawkSteve3 жыл бұрын
very true! Sometimes an airframe can be upgraded with new engines, avionics, sensors, etc and continue to serve. The F-15 Eagle is seeing new life as the F-15EX, which should keep that airframe flying for a few decades further!
@RogerM883 жыл бұрын
Hope Curious Droid makes a video about Reaction Engines and their Space plane prototype Skylon.
@BeKindToBirds3 жыл бұрын
Many of the very old planes of the US fleet can be summed up with this: The design fills a fundamental requirement, it takes less effort to maintain the old airframe and update it than to completely start from scratch and begin again. If we were to throw them ALL away, A-10, B-52, etc.. and try to build an aircraft that does the same thing they would end up looking almost exactly the same. They would have their systems in almost the exact same places. Eventually time will force them to be replaced but without a large change in technology they really will be nearly identical. Clearly stealth and remote operation or independent operation isn't yet mature enough to dictate the cost. Lots of things evolve into crabs for a reason. It's a good design.
@HuntingTarg2 жыл бұрын
The AF tried to obsolesce & replace the A-10, but too many Army and Marines objected. Now it's getting 'reincarnated.'
@revolver643 жыл бұрын
I grew up just outside Edwards AFB in the 70s and 80s. I saw (and heard) the Blackbird and U2 in the skies pretty much weekly. Love those old birds.
@munozcampos3 жыл бұрын
Its interesting to note how the U for Utility was a covert designation for the aircraft. The paradox is that it seemingly fit the Utility designation accurately instead of utilizing the typical R for Reconnaissance.
@SithLordGree3 жыл бұрын
I worked IT for Lockheed a few years ago. I was helping an engineer with his computer who refurbishes U2's. He asked me what I thought and I told him "it was pretty impressive for it's time." To which I received a stern comment back, "it's still impressive now!"
@kenjifox42643 жыл бұрын
Curious Droid makes the best documentaries on YT. Subscribed!
@terrypitt-brooke83673 жыл бұрын
When I had a chance to see the cockpit of an SR71 in the 1990s, I marvelled at how primitive the instrumentation was. It was stunning that something conceived before computers were really a thing had done things that have never been excelled. This video shows that the same applies--perhaps even more so--to the U-2, and good old fashioned film cameras!
@kmc73553 жыл бұрын
Excellent shirtage and video 👍
@jeffreyhill10113 жыл бұрын
I deleted my comment as soon as I posted it I remembered this is the Droid and his shirt game is on point
@GeologicDesigns3 жыл бұрын
I look for them on ads-b every day and find them out there a lot. Thanks for the history, it was great!
@philteal36023 жыл бұрын
We get the U2 fly over us most days....nice and low going into land...always run outside to try and find it😁👍
@Scroticus_Maximus3 жыл бұрын
Love your videos. They are to the point, well edited and illustrative, as well as being narrated in a fluid fashion.
@FlyWithMe_6663 жыл бұрын
It’s still spying for audible to check that CD puts at least 3 minutes of ads into a 10 min video.
@russellmoore81873 жыл бұрын
Watch or don't, those are your two options. Paul has no obligation to make these for free
@FlyWithMe_6663 жыл бұрын
@@russellmoore8187 Agreed! I pay monthly youtube premium fees to get rid of ads.
@arthas6403 жыл бұрын
That's a big reason why i never get KZbin premium, there are already a few minutes of ads loaded into most videos so even if you pay for "ad free service" you're really only getting rid of a fraction of the ads.
@thanksfernuthin3 жыл бұрын
AND how Audible managed to silently become a monopoly for audio books. And why they charge as much for a narrator and sound crew to read a book as a studio charges for tens of thousands of high paid professionals to produce a movie. (Hey. You got me started.)
@Keex113 жыл бұрын
For PC you can check out the Sponsor Block Browser extension.
@weirdshibainu3 жыл бұрын
I live in Reno. A company I worked for was in the direct flight path of the airport. One summer afternoon I left work around 6 p.m. as I was walking out to my car, I heard a slight whisper. I looked up and it was a U2 making a final approach to the airport. It was probably about 500 feet above me. It was completely quiet and very cool to see. I have no idea why it was landing at a civilian airport ( there was a runway for private aircraft as well and I'm thinking it landed there) If I hadn't heard that whisper in an empty parking lot, I would have never known it was there.
@TheMrPeteChannel3 жыл бұрын
Heros get remembered. Legends never die
@keepthemetalflowing3 жыл бұрын
So... that would mean that this design (barring all the upgrades and various internal design changes), the Lockheed U-2 essentially if it does actually last another, say 30 years, will almost have been in service for 100 years. Roughly. THAT... is the amazing part to me. Great video.
@Hebdomad73 жыл бұрын
The real question is. Who will last longer? U2 the aircraft. Or U2 the band?
@petergray27123 жыл бұрын
Yes
@G12GilbertProduction3 жыл бұрын
B-52's.
@themocaw3 жыл бұрын
Allegedly when Powers was shot down, NASA offered to claim he had been a NASA pilot doing high altitude research. That never happened because Powers survived, but NASA apparently did take possession of two U-2s after they retired them for actual high altitude research.
@19TheChaosWarrior793 жыл бұрын
It's amazing it's still going considering how hard it is to land and takes a chase car with another pilot sat in it to guide it down
@loboheeler3 жыл бұрын
Yes, the U-2 pilot can't determine the aircraft's exact attitude when very close to the ground. You would think modern sensors/cameras would help this, but they do it the old proven way. We are not the only ones using 1950s technology, look at the Russian TU-95 turboprop bomber still in mainline service.
@Slarti3 жыл бұрын
For me the question is more "Why is new always better?" I am a software developer and see how the world is obsessed with shiny new technology. Much of this new technology is overcomplicated, brittle and essentially just a case of layers built on already existing robust systems. Simply put there is no real need for a lot of this new shiny technology beyond making a lot of money for a few clever marketers.
@HuntingTarg2 жыл бұрын
Sometimes I agree. Is it better to 'engineer in' features and functionality, or 'engineer out' flaws and failure modes?
@j.thomas71283 жыл бұрын
2:34 Start.
@MrGoesBoom3 жыл бұрын
Just cause it's old doesn't mean it's obsolete, great vid!
@randywatson83473 жыл бұрын
"and I still haven't found what I'm looking for"🎵
@AndyCigars3 жыл бұрын
...yeah...that's a better question...why is that band still around...because they suck.
@Kudu3003 жыл бұрын
Still one of the best documentary chanels out there. Good work sir.
@vaclav_fejt3 жыл бұрын
I spy with my little eye...the coolest aircraft of them all.
@chrisford32123 жыл бұрын
Volcon bomber
@The_TD5_Discovery3 жыл бұрын
Loving the amount of content at the moment. Thanks Paul!
@nikkothegoblin3 жыл бұрын
Thank you notifications, I will definitely be enjoying this :) Ring the bell, folks
@markw2083 жыл бұрын
Well done video 👍. You gave a good history and explanation of how the U2/TR1 are still incredibly valuable and capable. Another legendary aircraft from Kelly Johnson and crew at Lockheed Skunk Works.
@officialdropnation3 жыл бұрын
🔥
@opticsrus99813 жыл бұрын
Love all the hard work you do for your channel. Awesome stuff.
@spacecatboy29623 жыл бұрын
the U2 still hasnt found what its looking for
@garethjones47426 ай бұрын
3 years old under rated comment. Take my updoot sir.
@tafftastic3 жыл бұрын
I recall seeing a U2 parked up at Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo in the 90s. It’s wing span was incredible. Awesome video. Thanks.
@drihtamnetu3 жыл бұрын
There is no airport there.
@Veni_Vidi_Vortice3 жыл бұрын
Re: Audible - when you are cycling it might be a good idea to listen to the environment around you. It might just save your life.
@ollieb98753 жыл бұрын
I wear just one of those wireless earbud things in my nearside ear which I think is kind of ok on the quieter roads yeah