Daily Delivery | Pac-12 members are still dealing with the reality of their dropping value

[@saltoftheearth5414]

Anyway we can get you to come on over to the DOUBLE T......great show ...thanks...GO BIG 12

[@ltsantio3755]

Both leagues are just struggling to keep up with the Big 10 and the SEC I'm not a fan of either conference but that's how I see this whole thing.

[@patrickboren2211]

The Big XII is talking about upto $65 Million per team and I know that is not close to $100 Million but the PAC and ACC are at half of that.

[@CreightonRabs]

Gotta love how all the PAC apologists are popping out of the woodwork to defend a league which any reasonable observer would concede is in big trouble. Men's basketball is helping the B12 a lot more than people realize (hello, Baylor and Kansas, AKA the last two national champions). Baylor and Okie State put on quite a show in the B12 title game last season; I-State and No U's title showdown in 2020 was pretty compelling too. So, before the PAC apologists continue to defend their league, bear in mind that losing the LA market is more damaging to the PAC than the B12 losing TexU and No U.

[@patrickboren2211]

Hope to see anothe OU and Texas less Big XII Championship for this last season I believe with those two.

[@stinger0772]

Please no Cal or Stanford

[@machtschnell7452]

Yeah, they are such academically challenging schools for the voluntarily ignorant! 🤯

[@jwalton5425]

Sentiment is universal.

[@carsonc29]

I think everyone knew the new PAC deal wouldnt be good..and wont be wherever they try to go..but we still have to hope the new B12 deal lives up to the projections...if they really can get 40+ million without OU and Texas, then coaxing some PAC schools should be pretty easy...especially if UW and Oregon try to get the PAC to give them unequal revenue to get them to stay

[@philvenzor1720]

We will see baldy

[@machtschnell7452]

Call John Kurz. He is convinced the Medium 12 is worth $50M per team annually,. One team leaves the PAC and it is dead.

[@tylerduvall1386]

Big 12 is only stable because NOBODY wants their teams

[@joekhatib3798]

Has John been blowing kisses at you again!!! 🤔

[@jackernst612]

Macht Scnell - KSU Alum here - Hatred is proportional to jealousy. You know what you can do with your word """Medium""". You are a clown !!!

[@carsonc29]

1? oh bro im sorry, UCLA isnt gonna get blocked from joining the BIG..so no, the PAC IS losing both...2nd, look up the navigate projections youeself..THEY have the new B12 projected to make 50 million by 2029..and im pretty sure they have more resources than you do to make that projection

[@CreightonRabs]

Eventually, $50M isn't unreasonable considering you're getting the Orlando/Central Florida and Houston markets with the addition of UH and UCF. Not to mention BYU's national following and Cincinnati's recent run to the CFP. So, yeah, the B12 is worth a bit more than the PAC. Granted, not as much as the B1G/SEC, but still, there's the potential for a much better deal and the PAC and even the ACC.

[@Aztecs911]

Sounding like a homer. You forgot to mention that 6 of the remaining 10 PAC teams have TV ratings higher than any Big 12 holdover over the past 6 years. Maybe your next homer video can dive into that. In case you missed it TV ratings / $$$ is driving all this movement.

[@carsonc29]

none of that seems to matter since the new PAC TV $$ projections have them making less than the new B12..but no to worry, a few of those PAC markets you boast about will fit real nice in the B12 LOL

[@jefnatividad5968]

Wreck'em Tech

[@827dusty]

Not so fast Kemosabe. You're using the word "seems" to be this or "seems to be that. Me thinks you are in pure conjecture mode. That's fine, just admit it. None of us knows much of anything that's happening with The Pac 12/10. Let things play out a bit, and we'll have a much clearer picture. A lot of different scenarios exist, and to say it's the Big 12 or oblivion, is a bit presumptuous at this early stage. Maybe that will occur, but maybe it won't Lots of time left. Thanks friend

[@carsonc29]

sure, at this point its all maybe or maybe not...but so far, nothing really seems to look in favor of the PAC staying together as they are right now..they probably wont cease to be a conference, but its feasible they could lose a few schools to the B12...

[@happiness9752]

Sounds like your mom, she's dealing with her dripping value. Haha the age goes up your mom's appeal goes down

[@Alohanate2004]

Big 12 unity...maybe now but I remember last year when Texas and Oklahoma announced they were leaving. Half the schools called the PAC 12 begging for a spot, while Iowa State and Kansas were calling up the Big 10. Only after they all said no did the Big 12 unify and add 4 group of 5 schools. PAC 12 media rights are not worth that much? Then why does the Big 12 want to add PAC 12 teams so much?

[@sethderusseau3429]

The Pac-12 still sucks at football.

[@bryanjones8778]

The Big 12 will add PAC schools that are "additive" in conference revenue and not "dilutive."

[@glennlewman1377]

Take the best a leave the rest. The B12 needs to separate themselves for the PAC/MWC

[@carsonc29]

@@glennlewman1377 I think they already have..but adding a few solid PAC schools all but seals their fate..I wouldnt take UW or Oregon though..B12 needs programs that wont be looking for a way out from day 1...I think the PAC survives, but they will be a shell of their former self..guess the same can be said about the B12.....we have to create a whole new identity..

[@desmoinesreport]

@nate Calhoun. Please provide a solid source that ISU and KU "were calling the Big 10 (and received a NO". I think you are confusing speculation with actual action. ISU and KU were always gong to be speculated to go to Big 10 due to the $$$ and they were the only AAU schools in the Big 12.

[@swallman]

Unity in the big 12? You lost six of your best teams lol

[@ThatGuyz82]

I will take "worthless comments that don't take many things into consideration" for $500 Alex.

[@carsonc29]

not really...only OU, Texas and Nebraska were really big losses..Colorado, Missouri and TXAM really werent that bad

[@desmoinesreport]

@steven Wallman -- are you unable to differentiate timelines and circumstances? Your comments suggests the answer is "no".

[@ThatGuyz82]

@@desmoinesreport he is a typical keyboard warrior who argues to try and win; rather than be correct.

[@jeffwatson68]

@@carsonc29 I agree with you on Mizzou and CU were replaced in kind with TCU and WV. Still wish none ever left accept Texas.