I remembered back in uni our lecturer asked us to see an exhibition about Wallace. Here in Singapore we still have his samples and remember him. He has a cabinet display at Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum and also a learning centre named after him, Wallace Education Centre at Dairy Farm Nature Park
@christrammell-strategistla62115 жыл бұрын
This video is awesome! After being a biology teacher for 15 years, I wish I would’ve had this summary long ago. Fantastic job! Simplified, clear, entertaining, accurate, historically synthesized and relevant, beautiful job. Donation and support here I come!!
@davidrosner62676 жыл бұрын
I can't believe biology did not emerge as a formal discipline until 1859. I would have thought it would have been older. Goes to show how new modern science and our modern world are in the greater scheme of human history and natural history.
@ShaedeReshka6 жыл бұрын
The word "science" didn't even appear until the 19th century. Hell, "religion" didn't even appear until the 17th century. "Philosophy" is ancient, though, so you can safely use that concept to understand the past. In fact, until about the 20th century, universities generally only taught theology, medicine, politics, and "philosophy" - which was a catch-all phrase for everything else, including what we call "science" today. Today, philosophy is being gutted from many universities to be replaced with career training, so our oldest concept for education is disappearing.
@スノーハッピー6 жыл бұрын
Most of the scientific disciplines we recognise today weren't formalised until the mid to late 1800s. People have always studied life, but biology refers to a professional discipline studying life in a certain way. People have always studied how things physically interact, but physics again refers to a professional discipline studying life in a certain way. And so on and so forth. Following on what Metaldigital said, what we call "science" now was called natural philosophy in the West before it was called science. It took me two, three years of studying biology and history and philosophy of science to realise that to do science IS to do philosophy. It deals with the same things as any other branch of philosophy does - questions about ontology, epistemology, the operations and pitfalls of logic, the creation and management of systems of organisation, and the question of how we - people - relate to whatever we're studying. It's just that each branch of science has very particular assumptions (usually hidden) that makes it look very straightforward, black and white. But it's anything but.
@truthtruthtruth67955 жыл бұрын
I am sure therr were greatest biologist before the flood
@baileyperham17165 жыл бұрын
darwin is just theory
@songoflovemetalofficial5 жыл бұрын
Modern science comes from the devil it is only rexent becauae satan only invented thia evil scheme recemtly watch kent hovind a videos
@Brainstorm696 жыл бұрын
Those two giants of biology deserve all the credit they can get. To come up with a mechanism for evolution is no small feat. And to travel around the world on a ship in the 19th century is not pleasant. I'm still in awe of their deep understanding even by today's standards.
@ethanmcdonald58995 жыл бұрын
The rothschilds (the people who make money and therefor have infinite money) funded him. Why? Do your research.
@truthtruthtruth67955 жыл бұрын
They will.surely burn in hell bible says bewarebif you offend one of these little ones as.God will destroy darwin unless he repented befpre dying
@pedroguerrero38625 жыл бұрын
@@truthtruthtruth6795 hai, why don't you stopped reading your fairy tale book and achually learn something that is real.
@justindixon45645 жыл бұрын
@@pedroguerrero3862 darwins theory is totally made up and not mathematically possible
@WhenInDarknessSeekTheLight5 жыл бұрын
@@justindixon4564 Says the one who believes in a magic man in the sky.
@DrewDapps6 жыл бұрын
wow I literally just searched for this exact video an hour ago as I'm cramming for my anthropology test. And then you just upload it in front of my very eyes :o
@brax26495 жыл бұрын
Wallace was a brilliant scientist with an amazing life story. Thanks for shedding some light on him. Great intro to Darwin as well!
@lemonhead12566 жыл бұрын
you guys have really done a bang up job with this series
@sayandeepguin86486 жыл бұрын
Wallace deserves far more recognition than what he gets.
@JEOGRAPHYSongs6 жыл бұрын
What an amazing set of discoveries we learned from Charles Darwin!
@truthtruthtruth67955 жыл бұрын
Darwin.the great liar devil possessed can natural selection think? No does it has brain? No can it plan? No but l thimgs are planned your shoes someone chose the color the size the shape.why os earth blue? Not red yellow ? From.natural selection? No it cannot tjonk nor plan anything thus it can only come from God
@azap125 жыл бұрын
@@truthtruthtruth6795 It doesn't necessarily need to have mind for it to work that is why its called "natural" selection.
@truthtruthtruth67955 жыл бұрын
@@azap12 The cross of Christ will be the science and the song of the redeemed through all eternity. In Christ glorified they will behold Christ crucified. Never will it be forgotten that He whose power created and upheld the unnumbered worlds through the vast realms of space, the Beloved of God, the Majesty of heaven, He whom cherub and shining seraph delighted to adore-humbled Himself to uplift fallen man; that He bore the guilt and shame of sin, and the hiding of His Father’s face, till the woes of a lost world broke His heart and crushed out His life on Calvary’s cross. That the Maker of all worlds, the Arbiter of all destinies, should lay aside His glory and humiliate Himself from love to man will ever excite the wonder and adoration of the universe. As the nations of the saved look upon their Redeemer and behold the eternal glory of the Father shining in His countenance; as they behold His throne, which is from everlasting to everlasting, and know that His kingdom is to have no end, they break forth in rapturous song: “Worthy, worthy is the Lamb that was slain, and hath redeemed us to God by His own most precious blood!” GC 651.2
@azap125 жыл бұрын
@@truthtruthtruth6795 Stop preaching
@truthtruthtruth67955 жыл бұрын
@@azap12 explain All.thimg.require plannimg.a song.requores planning the number of chorises the xolor of car house material ised yes it all needs planning You believe in magic then.ah ah
@piyamaslimapichart51326 жыл бұрын
This is the best history of science episode so far.
@jaksonjudge4665 жыл бұрын
Stop reading the comments you have a test on Monday.
@mahmoudbakro50415 жыл бұрын
How tf did u know
@emilianojustice55665 жыл бұрын
Wtf how’d u know.
@SniperSheep1275 жыл бұрын
Close, i have to do a research paper for tommorow
@zefty53415 жыл бұрын
Sorry
@baileyperham17165 жыл бұрын
i actually do have to hand in my overdue paper on darwin
@gabytorres97676 жыл бұрын
I'm just so happy this series exists.
@MyPisceanNature6 жыл бұрын
Why does it make me giggle every time Hank refers to Charles Darwin as "Chuck"?
@willemvandebeek6 жыл бұрын
Norris
@steam23006 жыл бұрын
Same! the original Chuck D!
@scottylilacleona91936 жыл бұрын
Charlie Brown references?
@MyPisceanNature6 жыл бұрын
@@scottylilacleona9193 Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, I just know it made me laugh every time he said "Chuck" lol.
@fernie5.06 жыл бұрын
Red dead redemption 2
@JuDGe36906 жыл бұрын
For a good in-depth textbook overview of the history of evolutionary theory-including the preliminaries to Darwin's theory, as discussed in previous episodes-I highly recommend "Evolution: The History of an Idea" by Peter J. Bowler, a distinguished historian of science and professor at Queen's University Belfast.
@amandalacombaberrios99014 жыл бұрын
Is it just me or should Crash Course make children books (or just illustrated books in general) about their different videos and topics?
@haseulslonglostseal20525 жыл бұрын
As someone who just finished reading On the Origin of Species, I'm so glad you focused on the other creatures he studied so I could learn WHY HE WOULDN'T STOP TALKING ABOUT PIGEONS. (Also he literally only mentions finches twice)
@RadLoops6 жыл бұрын
Thank you Hank, John, and everyone. I've watched hundreds of hours and I owe you so much. Not ready yet, but my patreon membership is imminent..
@tophers37566 жыл бұрын
I love the ongoing in-joke about Darwin and Wallace in the movie "The Fall". A fictional version of a young Charles Darwin is shown wearing a psychedelic, butterfly patterned coat. His secret companion is a monkey named Wallace that he keeps hidden in a sack. He's able to understand Wallace who repeatedly chatters helpful ideas pertinent to the bizzare situations in which they end up. Ideas that Darwin repeatedly passes off as his own.
@harrywompa6 жыл бұрын
I love the Fall! I should go watch it again, it's been a while.
@ArawnOfAnnwn6 жыл бұрын
By all accounts, Wallace does deserve credit for evolution. But alongside, not instead of, Darwin. Darwin didn't simply pass off Wallace's ideas as his own (don't think you intended to suggest the real one did, but just in case). Also worth noting that they weren't competitors - they published together, supported each others ideas and Darwin also tried to help Wallace with his financial difficulties.
@TheTariqibnziyad5 жыл бұрын
its gonna be a really good episode, i really sense the excitement in your eyes Hank !
@kyliebro88325 жыл бұрын
This is amazing! Intelligent, informative and humorous. Thank you!
@gyohza6 жыл бұрын
I love the remake of the intro theme.
@aspiahmacaurog43545 жыл бұрын
Actually, this video about Charles Darwin, Alfred Russel, Wallance with their natural selection is something familiar to me. I think when I was in grade 9 or 10. Darwin Wallance as the one man who truly understand the idea of evolution by natural selection. Natural selection can be used by farmers to generate organisms with desirable fruits. Darwin Theory explained through the natural selection, more individuals are produced each generation than can survive. I'm amazed to the both of them! Thanks to this video.
@mathewfinch6 жыл бұрын
The thing that social darwinists don’t understand is that the trait that has made humans successful is our capacity for cooperation.
@tophers37566 жыл бұрын
^This
@davidrosner62676 жыл бұрын
Cooperation can serve an evolutionary benefit since it increases the likelihood that certain individuals will pass on their genes. It doesn't really contradict Darwin's theory of natural selection in this sense. Knowing when to work constructively with other is in and of itself a survival strategy.
@abhinavtiku45016 жыл бұрын
I would amend that statement to say that "intelligent cooperation in the face of increased competition" was the trait that sealed our dominance of the planet.
@danielstevens16996 жыл бұрын
Well I wouldn't say that was the only trait that made us successful. Pattern recognition was also an important trait.
@michaeljorfi35526 жыл бұрын
@Diglikeashovel oversimplification
@jaydon2255 жыл бұрын
Every time I watch this video, I can't help but imagine just how brilliant Darwin and Wallace were. Discovering natural selection was no mean feat.
@JanBartnik6 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: the only thing Darwin's theory of evolution was missing at the time was an article written by Mendel. His article was one of very few Darwin probably never read as he didn't take any notes on a copy he had.
@madbritishbelizian6 жыл бұрын
Darwin and Natural Selection talking about Wallace I greatly appreciate, and great for him to get a shout out as the creator of Biogeography, but can we get a series focusing on "Great People of Science" (and other disciplines) where we get an episode or two focusing exclusively on individuals such as Darwin and Wallace?
@noodlesmetzout6 жыл бұрын
Ahh man I just summarized an entire chapter on Darwin when I could have just watched this
@stevenjlovelace6 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Charles Darwin was born on the exact same day as Abraham Lincoln.
@AbbeyRoadkill16 жыл бұрын
It's always fun to debate which person born on Feb. 12th, 1809, had a greater impact on world history: Darwin or Lincoln. At first glance, you'd think it's no contest - Darwin's ideas have transformed the world whereas Lincoln's impact was a bit more local in scale. But when you think about it a little more deeply you realize that science would have kept on trucking even if Darwin had never lived (we'd just be celebrating Wallace nowadays instead of Darwin.) Had Lincoln not been there to hold the United States together at the most critical point in its history, the world might currently be ruled by Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan.
@ShaedeReshka6 жыл бұрын
@@AbbeyRoadkill1 It's also entirely possible that any president would have basically done the same thing. No president would want to be the one who let the country split in half.
@just4commentsable6 жыл бұрын
Well, timezones .... So Darwin was born first
@AbbeyRoadkill16 жыл бұрын
@@ShaedeReshka ... George McClellan had promised to immediately end the war and come to terms with the Confederacy. Had he won the 1864 election it's quite possible that's what would've happened.
@ijeomanwachuku51686 жыл бұрын
nice!
@elhijodelportadordeluz12206 жыл бұрын
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life *
@whattheysaidarabi6 жыл бұрын
Evolution the process by which life changes over time, and in order to function it requires two things. The first is mutation-- random alterations in the genetic material over time due to copying errors, and the second is natural selection-- a non-random process that drives how mutations are spread through a given environment. Mutations are extremely well documented and are actually the source of some of the more deadly diseases to afflict animals across the planet. There are two major types of mutations that can occur. The first is a point mutation. A point mutation occurs when a base in a gene is swapped for another base, and nothing has been inserted or removed. The result is generally benign or produces no effect in the resulting protein as the amino acid is not altered (There are 64 possible combinations in a single codon, which consists of 3 base-pairs, and there are only 20 amino acids used in life on earth. As a result, more than one codon can code for the same amino acid). For example, sickle-cell anemia is a point mutation that produces malformed hemoglobin and increases the risk of various cardiovascular complications (due to their rigid shape). The second type of mutation involves the insertion and removal of nucleotides from the gene and is prone to causing problems in translation. This sort of mutation causes problems because a single codon consists of 3 base pairs, and has designated start and stop signatures that are read by tRNA. When a single nucleotide is inserted into a sequence it can cause the translation of this gene into a protein to start or stop prematurely-- this is known as a frame-shift, and if this happens the mutation is referred to as a frame-shift mutation. Of course, these sorts of mutations can occur with more than one nucleotide at a time, as is the case with Tay-Sachs disease. Tay-Sachs is most frequently caused by the insertion of four nucleotides into the HEXA (hexosaminidase A) gene, and the result is progressive deterioration of nerve cells-- generally starting at around six months old. There are several other kinds of mutations that can occur, though this should do for the basics. On to natural selection... Natural selection is an observable process that has to do with a given population of animals. Specifically, it's a combination of social and ecological pressures on a population that causes mutations to propagate in a non-random pattern. Animals that express mutations that are ill-suited to their environments are less likely to pass on those genes when compared to animals that express genes that allow them to thrive more adequately given current pressures. This means that if you have a mutation that causes a disease such as sickle-cell anemia, you're (slightly) less likely to pass on that trait unless you live in an area of the world that is afflicted by Malaria, to which sickle-cell anemia provides natural resistance. As a result, sickle-cell anemia is quite common in tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world and still lingers in the populations of people who hail from these regions. So to summarize: - Mutations occur at random. - Mutations come in several varieties, the most important for our purposes right now are insertion, deletion, frame-shift, and point. - Point mutations are less likely to lead to health problems than insertion or deletion mutations because more than one codon can code for the same amino acid. - A frame-shift can cause tRNA to begin or end translation from RNA to a protein prematurely and will cause the sequence following the frame-shift mutation to translate incorrectly. - Natural selection is NOT random and is the result of environmental pressures on a population. And from this we can make the following rather basic logical deductions: - It is more likely for a point mutation to propagate through an environment than a mutation that adds or removes nucleotides. - Insertion and deletion mutations are more likely to propagate through a population if they insert or remove nucleotides in multiples of three. - A mutation does NOT need to be entirely beneficial to propagate. The benefits need only outweigh the detriments in a given environment. (See also: sickle-cell anemia) - Animals better suited to their environment are more likely to thrive in it than animals that are not. Pretty simple, right? Here's the tricky part. Because genes are passed down from parent(s) to child(ren), you have an accumulation of mutations over time. Because mutations occur at random during the copying process, any part of your genome can be affected by them. Since both of these things are true, then that means that mutations can be accumulated by a population over time. If mutations can be accumulated by a population over time, there will come a time where a species will no longer share enough DNA in common with its ancestors to breed successfully (children will be sterile, stillborn, will miscarriage, or won't even fertilize an egg). This is what is known as speciation. This, in a nutshell, is evolution.
@anungodlyamountofcereal63846 жыл бұрын
I have long awaited this day!!!
@nantukoprime6 жыл бұрын
Darwin, the scientist that was known to eat his specimens That was why it was so hard to get a Galapagos tortoise to zoos at the time. They were apparently quite tasty and never survived the trip.
@efjeK6 жыл бұрын
Haha, Darwin wasn't the only one! It took 300 years to officially name the giant turtiose due to its deliciousness! (A specimen needed to be brought to London to get an official name)
@WhatWouldBojackDo6 жыл бұрын
So at one point in Darwin's life, he ate postly barnacles and pigeons? :s
@zurdoaggresive5 жыл бұрын
Cancelled
@sleepieste4 жыл бұрын
he frick fracked w his cousin n ate turtles. he be wilding.
@jennathepeculiar4226 жыл бұрын
Taking a short break from my homework to watch some crash course hell yeah!
@kadusa1dl376 жыл бұрын
It's often difficult to find one's self in the Context of The evolution of the Genome . Yet , there you are
@yup_itsvincent66024 жыл бұрын
Anyone else here during quarantine for Bio Class?
@nikolademitri7316 жыл бұрын
I didn’t know all those details on Wallace, aside from his figuring out natural selection, contacting Darwin, and their publishing the joint paper a year before Darwin’s “Origins”. I do THANK YOU for pointing out that Darwin and Wallace DID NOT come up with “survival of the fittest”, and that it’s no more than a perversion of “Darwinism”. Great video!
@oliviabeltran18046 ай бұрын
This video allowed me to learn more about natural selection outside of the famous “survival of the fittest”. Very interesting.
@MrBomasBalloons6 жыл бұрын
The fundamental idea of Social Darwinism, that some classes and/or races of people are fundamentally and inherently inferior to others and it is therefore counterproductive to society to spend resources on them, predates Darwin by more than 100 years. As you point out, it was these economic theories that influenced Darwin and Wallace. And in a kind of feedback-loop, some of Darwin's most enthusiastic supporters were the economists who were pushing this idea. In Natural Selection, they recognized a scientific theory they could dress their prejudice up in. And the echoes of those socioeconomic theories can still be heard in the politics and policies of the modern world.
@Teo1173 ай бұрын
I’m happy to rewatch this.
@withlovevicky6 жыл бұрын
1:42 1 of many reasons why i love crash course
@danieljabr69807 ай бұрын
Thanks really wanted to learn about this
@LeandroR995 жыл бұрын
This is good art direction.
@tums19975 жыл бұрын
Hank: there are no stupid, ugly turtles me: there's one. Mitch McConnell
@ElGringoCastellano6 жыл бұрын
Malthusianism is a useful primitive model for animal populations, but it's worth noting that its application to humans was refuted in 1879 by Henry George.
@misterbubbles63896 жыл бұрын
I find it especially hilarious that Malthus declared that the human population globally would never exceed more than one billion, only for the Industrial revolution to kick off and guarantee that it would eventually septuple that figure
@MakeMeThinkAgain6 жыл бұрын
Malthus was right given the means of production he was familiar with. And there's no guarantee that the earth will always be able to support more than a billion humans.
@Mark-dc1su6 жыл бұрын
It was refuted in 1867, 13 years prior, by Karl Marx. His theory of the Reserve Army of Labor is a much better, scientific and empirical theory.
@sstff67716 жыл бұрын
Just Reading Henry George
@MakeMeThinkAgain6 жыл бұрын
I don't recall the bit about Malthus, but his "Progress and Poverty" remains a great guide to the cyclical problems of capitalism. I'm seeing businesses shutting down here in SF due to increasing rent just as he described in the 19th century. The problem is that we are greedy and like playing the game the way it is.
@maggierossler12964 жыл бұрын
Hank. You are, by far, my favorite KZbin personality. Awesome!
@daanyafazal49644 жыл бұрын
ME: this video could help me A's my exam FUTURE ME: nah a got a normal sore -_-
@magixshiz25434 жыл бұрын
Bro you got a normal sore? I’m so sorry. What about ur test score tho
@GillianLewis-s8t Жыл бұрын
I love how they make it interesting!
@itstheundisputedsagboo4 жыл бұрын
Nicely Done 👌🏾
@PoloMolo_045 жыл бұрын
This will help me on my assignment thank you. :D
@marisp25886 жыл бұрын
Perfect timing seeing as I have a midterm on this exact subject tomorrow
@elsamascarenhas93276 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for the next episode!
@gabbromancer6 жыл бұрын
im actually related to darwins wife and that side of the family
@FabiolaSuarez6 жыл бұрын
Where are my science majors at?!
@Ashathefree86 жыл бұрын
Biology reporting in
@FabiolaSuarez6 жыл бұрын
Austin Gray Same! What are you going to do after you finish?
@Ashathefree86 жыл бұрын
Depends, I was hoping to get into bionics, but I have trouble researching it with it being such a new field, so I might have to get another degree in computing.
@FabiolaSuarez6 жыл бұрын
Austin Gray Cool! At first I was thinking on going to med school but I don’t think I’ld like their lifestyle. I kinda want to have free time to work on my passions such as KZbin so I was thinking of going to Pharm school. But I still don’t know.
@Ashathefree86 жыл бұрын
I like the idea of working for a smaller start up, but by the time I get all the necessary degrees who knows what the state of bionics will be.
@IAKhan-km4ph6 жыл бұрын
Very nicely explained. well, Why these theory are not talk much about plants and vegetation,
@kca_randy6 жыл бұрын
I've been waiting for this one Love the channels
@aaronius44445 жыл бұрын
Watching this for my History 04B class!!
@dcsignal52416 жыл бұрын
If you get the chance, watch the 1978 BBC mini-series, The Voyage of Charles Darwin
@orlandosmith59964 жыл бұрын
Very informative video 👍
@kevinyee95506 жыл бұрын
Awesome episode
@nilvoidzero0006 жыл бұрын
Darwin should have changed “most fittest” to “most adapted” so he would have avoided several misconceptions about natural selection. “Most fittest” conjures up super-strong animals. Being super-strong does not necessarily mean you will survive. Being a lion sucks if your only food source is meat and all the meat source is dying out while there are plenty of plants growing around. It boils down to energy balance and adapting to it.
@ManderRush4 жыл бұрын
Yo that background for the credits tho 😍 need google image sesrch
@sabrinaratay92085 жыл бұрын
This is the best evolution i ever seen in the earth b
@juliettasorensen45745 жыл бұрын
"If you remember one name in the history of modern biology, it should be TWO names!!!" Oh my god yes
@alexlandherr2 жыл бұрын
Props to Darwin for acknowledging the problems with his and Wallace’s ideas.
@miketian53486 жыл бұрын
Ohhh... I know why CrashCourse likes turtles...., It's because Turtles all the way down!
@KFaria276 жыл бұрын
Such an interesting episode!
@lilolebob5 жыл бұрын
At 22 I also had a collection of Beatles. And one of them had wings.
@treachery59306 жыл бұрын
IT'S COMING! EVERYONE HIDE! ITS ALMOST HERE! THE COMMENT SECTION!
@magnuspeacock58576 жыл бұрын
By "fittest" does it mean those that fit the environment the best?
@mrinalganash47256 жыл бұрын
Magnus Peacock yes
@MusicalRaichu6 жыл бұрын
more specifically, those who survive best in their environment to reproduce and thus pass on their traits to the next generation. so best at obtaining shelter, food, mating partners, etc.
@MakeMeThinkAgain6 жыл бұрын
The best Industrial Revolution example of this were the moths that changed their coloration twice,. They got darker when coal smoke made everything darker and then lightened up again when the coal smoke was reduced.
@alexventimilla69106 жыл бұрын
Na brah, its whoever makes the most gains at the gym. D'you even lift?
@mankytoes6 жыл бұрын
It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is most adaptable to change.
@ethanchang78026 жыл бұрын
I mentioned Wallace during science and no one not even the teacher knew who he was.
@challakishore6975 Жыл бұрын
I liked the explanation! I love turtles 😅
@Rico-Suave_ Жыл бұрын
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all of it 12:28
@MosesEmmet6 жыл бұрын
And that’s why we give out Darwin awards these days kids...
@tophers37566 жыл бұрын
I have to admit that I hate the term "Darwin award". It stems from a basic misunderstanding of natural selection. Nerd problems.
@BurgundyBurnouts6 жыл бұрын
@@tophers3756 by their own terms, giving out a Darwin award deserves being given a Darwin award
@mankytoes6 жыл бұрын
Go on? People who remove themselves from the gene pool are contributing to human evolution. Feeling fear is not a bad thing. If you're nervous around explosives, that's a sign of mental health. If you have the instinct to want to juggle them, something might be a little wrong.
@Hashishin136 жыл бұрын
Losing stupid people, not losing stupid people and gaining intelligent people all equally affect human evolution. Anyone deserves the Darwin award as much as anyone else. There is no goal to evolution, therefor no way to gauge who deserves more points in whatever made up scheme for an award there is.
@Hashishin136 жыл бұрын
Evolution is a force of nature, it doesn't have intentionality. There are no "goals", only results. Human beings are as much a part of nature as any other thing. Whatever we do isn't running counter to evolution. We may alter natural selection but since evolution has no end goal or even preferred path, saying things like "runs counter to evolution" is unintelligible. Evolution isn't a path that you have to walk along or a ladder you have to climb. You are acting like evolution is a river when its actually more like the water in the river. If you dam or divert a river you can make the logical conclusion that you stopped the river or ended it completely. The water that would have gone through that river still exists though, its just in a dam or going through another river or somewhere else in the world. There is no law saying that people need to continually get more intelligent or that we need to stay as intelligent as we are. You are misinterpreting evolution if you are under that impression. You also made conflicting claims, either people can survive and reproduce while being stupid because we are "running counter to evolution" or stupid people have poor survivability and thus aren't reproducing.
@happilysecular23235 жыл бұрын
Q: Why did the creatard ask a snake to help him with his illness instead of a doctor? A: Creatards believe in talking snakes but not antibiotics
@andrewmiller41495 жыл бұрын
Happily Secular I sense a lot of anger and self pity from you. Is everything okay?
@happilysecular23235 жыл бұрын
@Andrew Miller “sense”? No, the word you’re looking for is “project”
@Jun0_90002 жыл бұрын
i can’t be the only one who watches these for fun right? … right?
@pabmusic12 жыл бұрын
Excellent. One very picky thing, though - the surname Lyell rhymes with 'trial'.
@geoffreywinn40316 жыл бұрын
Cool video!
@jackassqwe24 жыл бұрын
It’s wonderful! You don’t have to be the smartest or strongest person to survive but you have to adapt.
@leojiangtheterrible71426 жыл бұрын
Wow, hank is back
@bkcpplayz77574 жыл бұрын
Thankyou, this was really helpful for my project about Charles Darwin.
@flowerfairies46856 жыл бұрын
i STAN hank
@ShaedeReshka6 жыл бұрын
Great overview of Darwin and his bulldog. Glad you covered them both so much! Also, at the very end, your comments on Social Darwinism were spot on. Glad you didn't gloss over that; it was more important than the religious controversy.
@davidsamlafo2335 Жыл бұрын
Love this video
@azsuehayes6 жыл бұрын
Love you guys.❤
@chazkarr89626 жыл бұрын
i turn off addblock just for these videos
@blessingomoyemen17596 жыл бұрын
I have a new hypothesis, skip classes, make C's and be renowned like Charles Darwin
@Youssef-zo3ls6 жыл бұрын
blessing omoyemen you forgot coming up with a theory that explains the diversity of life and changes humanity’s understanding of how the natural world functions Good luck with that 😂😂
@alicareem6 жыл бұрын
it's amazing that we found ourselves by observing other creatures. i don't know what to use instead of creatures lol edit: instead of creatures i can say organisms.
@ginopalma71306 жыл бұрын
organisms
@alicareem6 жыл бұрын
@gino palma thanks
@Anonarchist6 жыл бұрын
"Married rich..." yes, THAT Wedgewood.
@roodycrles34656 жыл бұрын
I can see it now.... the chaos in the comment section
@qewdpie97546 жыл бұрын
thats why I'm doing homework right now
@kewgardensstation6 жыл бұрын
I just started rereading Kurt Vonnegut's novel Galapagos. Casual serendipity or formal synchronicity? 😉
@UnleashedProPlays6 жыл бұрын
Have a great day
@Ram-lr6ud6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this
@Lattimorre58 Жыл бұрын
Nick likes biology 🧬
@weebslime6 жыл бұрын
what about the Webber line along with Wallace's?
@Loriloya5 жыл бұрын
"which to be honest its more than I had" lolll
@RyanJumarPantoja6 жыл бұрын
I love this episode...
@Hashishin136 жыл бұрын
An excellent overview of evolution and why it was discovered. I'm a big evolution nerd and I think if I had to point anyone to a simple concise explanation this would be it. Out of context it loses a lot of it's explanatory power, the history here is vital.