The Stop Loss Dilemma - Risk Management vs. Strategy Performance

  Рет қаралды 5,367

Darwinex

Darwinex

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 17
@tomasliptak6401
@tomasliptak6401 3 жыл бұрын
It might affect profit factor and thus the final result negatively, but EASILY compensates for it with much better and stable Sharpe ratio, predictability, consistency and money management rules. My strategy calculates the capital to every single trade based on the distance to stop loss to somehow have a fix max loss per trade. Also I cannot imagine going to sleep without a proper stop loss. It's like an insurance - you pay the price every trade to be saved big time.
@miguelangellopez4395
@miguelangellopez4395 3 жыл бұрын
Absolutely fantastic this concept! I'm really looking forward to try this on my own systems. Thanks a lot Martyn! You're definitely the man!
@tabjohn1048
@tabjohn1048 3 жыл бұрын
Hi Martyn! This video was ABSOLUTELY AMAZING! Since few weeks I'm strugling with the dilema that you described. I'm implementing some of my ideas and solutions but after this video I will combine my ideas with yours! Thanks for such GREAT CONTENT!
@louislamprell2354
@louislamprell2354 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome vids as always. Are you exiting a little portion of your trade at each over bought mark, so that only a small portion gets taken out at the ESL? So say taking off 0.2% at each overbought mark? That was the only part not fully clear
@eTaupe
@eTaupe 3 жыл бұрын
Really good ! I will try that one in 2022
@seanjohnson7145
@seanjohnson7145 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Martyn really awesome series, Im going to put these techniques into practice and test test test test!
@munkh-odjargalsaikhan258
@munkh-odjargalsaikhan258 3 жыл бұрын
wow! good stuff. I will try this on my mean reversion strategy straight away! Now the issue is when to enable the overbought-oversold stoploss... I am thinking to enable it as soon as my take profit level (i set it as a moving average) goes negative. any suggestions? thanks!
@more_yasnotsi
@more_yasnotsi 2 жыл бұрын
That's a great idea, thanks a lot!
@garrykimovich
@garrykimovich Жыл бұрын
This seems like it would make performance worse, since you're still always taking a stop, aren't you? It seems like the net effect would be that your initial stop is actually getting even smaller. Suppose my normal stop is 10 points but I use a 50 point emergency stop instead. If price goes against me by 10 points I hold on and cover at a 5 point loss instead of the normal 10. If price goes against me by 15 points, then I hold on until it rebounds to 10 then I take my loss. Each time the market goes against me further, even if I hold on for a bounce before getting out, my loss always gets bigger. It's hard to visualize how this helps performance, unless you have some other way to determine when you should ignore the stop when it bounces and just hold on all the way until the loser turns into a winner.
@danielracovitan9779
@danielracovitan9779 2 жыл бұрын
what is a reasonable Emergency Stop Loss percentage?
@mohamadalikolahdouzmohamad5877
@mohamadalikolahdouzmohamad5877 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much, That was helpful.
@teebone2157
@teebone2157 3 жыл бұрын
I use modified conners RSI but will look into this as well
@Jean-SébastienPaquet
@Jean-SébastienPaquet 3 жыл бұрын
Great video!! thanks a lot.
@vincentjean6756
@vincentjean6756 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the series. I do not understand how this would imptove results. Would simply having multiple stops at various prices below the range acheive the same results? From a click trader perspective it I do not understand the benefits.
@arfa9601
@arfa9601 2 жыл бұрын
The logic is the same as the entry mechanism for breakout systems. When the price breaks out of a zone, you can either enter instantly or rather wait for a pullback to enter. Since random walk factor is more prominent in lower time horizons it’s expected that the breakout has purged most of liquidity lump at the zone proximity which will result in correction or pullback in price. Implementing a traditional stop loss for example in a long trade right below a swing low is identical to entering a short trade right upon breakout of swing low zone. However, exiting the long trade at OB/pullback signals below that swing low is identical to entering a breakout short trade after a pullback. In the latter, you will have that random walk (mean reversion) factor supporting your directional bias while taking liquidity from market. However, this is not so straightforward when you have large sized orders which will face lack of liquidity and friction in order filling which is another discussion. Cheers
@cusco4x295
@cusco4x295 2 жыл бұрын
You can do even better. Insted of closing the trade at those points, you simply open an hedge position of the same value, and you manage the trade to turn a loss into a profit. How about that??
@georgedaskaleas3736
@georgedaskaleas3736 3 жыл бұрын
So informative and valuable, as always. Thank you, Sir.
Designing Profit-Taking Exits for Trading Strategies
13:30
Darwinex
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Twin Telepathy Challenge!
00:23
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 126 МЛН
How to Fight a Gross Man 😡
00:19
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
ТВОИ РОДИТЕЛИ И ЧЕЛОВЕК ПАУК 😂#shorts
00:59
BATEK_OFFICIAL
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Кто круче, как думаешь?
00:44
МЯТНАЯ ФАНТА
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Taking a Top Down Approach to Day Trading · Peter Stolcers
1:10:42
Chat With Traders
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Stop Loss Techniques for Mean-Reversion Trading Strategies
12:02
Lessons From History’s Best Traders | Market Wizards | Jack Schwager
1:15:22
Trading Without Stops and Why Stops Don't Work ❗❓
12:58
UKspreadbetting
Рет қаралды 65 М.
Continuously Developing Profitable Trading Strategies - Boris Schlossberg
50:41
Etienne Crete - Desire To TRADE
Рет қаралды 41 М.
Twin Telepathy Challenge!
00:23
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 126 МЛН