Dassonville - Case 8/74

A brief explanation

[@user-rg1oq7iv6z]

I have my EU exam tomorrow. Thanks for saving my life with these videos 😂😭😭😭

[@drwernaart6713]

Rachael P good luck!

[@user-rg1oq7iv6z]

DrWernaart thank You, the exam went well 🤓

[@MarkPummell133]

very helpful; am taking EU next semester and your lectures are excellent... very well received!!!

[@smdecayeux]

Excellent and very short, thank you. You explain very clearly a complicated subject matter. I needed clarification of the Dassonville ruling because I am a translator and I could not fully understand some details in a text I had to translate. Your video helped me understand and then, I could make sure my translation was clear and without mistakes : thank you. In order to translate correctly, you must first make sure you really understand the meaning. Again, many thanks !

[@Jell0zz]

Thank you for the short overview of the Case, the amount of slide transitions is a bit excessive but I understand you jump-cut to keep the video short and concise. Thanks!

[@kaantg6462]

Thank you so much

[@saziashafi29]

Well explained Sir!

[@Abrookamuon]

Perfect❤

[@sazzadulislam3144]

Art 36 derogation and Mandatory Requirement looks quite same to me.Can you please clarity when,which one of those two ruling should apply? Thank you.

[@buyehereparfait4028]

can you please explain the difference between article 30 and article 34 TFEU?

[@victorudu.1713]

thanks for the explanation it was constructive. but your pronunciation of measures was almost confusing. it is pronounced as measures, not mergers. anyways thanks

[@TheKingdidu]

Good explanation, bad video quality and disturbing cuts

[@studentsays393]

Need to work on your trasitions, great explanation though

[@layfl3291]

I actually really liked them