Fleiss Kappa [Simply Explained]

[@aizazkhan5439]

Brilliant explanation. Simple and precise. This is how things should be taught in universities.

[@aaron.debattista]

I love your accent. It is really easy to understand what you're talking about! Wonderful video!

[@datatab]

Thank you! 😃

[@lenards8993]

The Slide at 0:53 is somewhat misleading, since Intra-class correlation is only for nested Data, were you have classes or groups. Otherwise, Krippendorffs Alpha is suited.

[@TsiresyPIERREBERNARD]

This is clearly and expertly explained!

[@ricardozabalayoe2672]

Well explained.

[@justice3530]

thank you~!!!

[@datatab]

You're welcome!!

[@mojdehag2121]

Very useful.

[@datatab]

Glad you think so!

[@edutests]

very good

[@datatab]

Glad it was helpful and many thanks for the Feedback! Regards Hannah

[@FreeElf25]

Is this only for binary outcomes ?

[@FreeElf25]

What if you have 3 outcomes yes, no, maybe and 3 raters? ,

[@udguruaroundtheworld]

❤❤❤❤ Thanks

[@khurramsaleem3109]

Hi, Can I use Fleiss Kappa in my case i.e. 2 Operators (Raters) run 3 types of samples (Strong positive, Low Positive & Negative) 10 Replicates of Each? Since you're only talking about Raters Not parameters/Variables. Previously I conducted similar Validation study with 2 Operators (Raters) and 2 Parameters (Positive and Negative), I used Cohen's Kappa which is quite Simple but this type I'm using 3 Parameters/Variables that's why I'm not sure which Calculator should I use. PLEASE HELP

[@annieyhcchang9730]

If we use the Fleiss Kappa to measure something more than twice with the same rater, do we need to ensure that the patient's condition remains constant as a prerequisite?

[@saradan3053]

final result is 0.2 ? how u get 0.19

[@datatab]

Could it be from the round? Regards, Mathias

[@junkdog8974]

"Don't worry it look more complicate than it is xD"

[@datatab]

: )

[@FreeElf25]

Is this only for binary outcomes ??