+-35mins there is something fundamentally flawed with the symmetrical view of the ouroborous. I know because I made one similar myself. However mind supervenes on nature, and nature prescribes the natural laws; it is not the (mental) laws that prescribe nature. The main question that drove my quest was the question of which 'space' is 'larger': the mind space or the matter in spacetime? Matter is fundamental, as mind supervenes on it. So Spinoza's view of Nature. However combinatorially the mind and its imagination is WAY richer than nature. We can imagine more than can physically exist, in way more variations and 'colors'. So the mind is richer than nature, but nature is larger than mind