David Wood's Top Argument Debunked (Islamic Dilemma)

[@MohammedAlSharif2002]

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "In Allah’s command to judge by what he has revealed to the people of the Torah and the Gospel is not a command to follow what has been abrogated. Just as in the command for the people of the Quran to judge by what Allah revealed isn’t a command to follow what has been abrogated. Rather, when there is Nasikh (the ruling that does the abrogating) and Mansukh (the ruling that gets abrogated), then what Allah has revealed is to judge by the Nasikh not the Mansukh. So, whoever judges by what is Mansukh has indeed judged by something other than what Allah, the Almighty, revealed. This is clarified by Allah's statement: “Say, "O People of the Scripture, you are [standing] on nothing until you uphold [the law of] the Torah, the Gospel, and what has been revealed to you from your Lord." And that which has been revealed to you from your Lord will surely increase many of them in transgression and disbelief. So do not grieve over the disbelieving people.”(Surah Al-Ma'idah: 68). This indicates that it was an order for Muhammad ﷺ to say to the People of the Scripture, to whom he was sent, that they are upon nothing until they uphold the Torah, the Gospel, and what was revealed to them from their Lord. This proves that they have with them what is known to be revealed by Allah, and they are commanded to uphold it if it was established by Muhammad ﷺ and was not abrogated. It is known that whatever Allah commanded through the words of a prophet and was not abrogated by a subsequent prophet, but instead Allah approves of it then Allah will command it through the words of other prophets one after the other, and there is nothing in the sending of the second prophet that would negate the obligation to follow what the first prophet commanded. It is not permissible to say that Allah abrogates everything He legislated in the first book with the second book. Rather, what is abrogated is minimal compared to what the books and laws agree upon. Also, in the Torah and the Gospel, there are indications of the prophethood of Muhammad ﷺ. Therefore, when the people of the Torah and the Gospel judge by what Allah revealed in them, they are judging by what obligates them to follow Muhammad ﷺ..." الجواب الصحيح لمن بدل دين المسيح (2/440)

[@gurutruthspeak598]

@@truthspeaker2405 Qu'ran 5:48 - The Qu'ran describes itself as the 'Furqaan' or CRITERION over the others... So anything in your torah & gospel that conflicts with the Qu'ran, can be confidently discarded as man-made, fabricated junk that wasn't part of original...🥱 Oh BTW, how many rescensions of the OT/NT can you name?

[@gurutruthspeak598]

@@truthspeaker2405 Corruption is everything found inside your man-made, fabricated, heavily edited & revised books of ancient myths, x-rated fantasies and half-truths... 😉

[@BESTINTHEWORLD0007]

​@@truthspeaker2405 Even if Quran say thus and it doesn't say so We know your book is full of lies Like in samuel 16 when david was described as son of jesse, a man of war and good with harp and they brought david to the court of saul and saul wrote to jesse son of obed the father of david to keep david with him and he became his armour bearer then in chapter 17 after david killed golaith saul is asking abner who is this boy and who is his father??? Abner who is the commander of his army and part of his court and his relative, responds i don't know How he doesn't know his armour bearer or his father who in chapter 16 saul did write to him?! Simply because the author of 1 samual tried to combine 2 different narrations about the origin of David's service under saul and how he connected with him

[@kenkaneki9138]

@@truthspeaker2405 What you have is not the gospel dont lie. You have four gossips you cant even agree which bible is the true one revealed by god. Why are you lying as if we dont know your books? I am surprised you actually want a verse from the Quran as if you checkmated us, this is beyond pathetic. There are many verses that attest to this. "So woe to those who write the Scripture with their own hands, and then say, 'This is from God,' that they may exchange it for a little price. Woe to them for what their hands have written, and woe to them for what they earn." Quran surah 2:79 "...............Nor those among the Jews who eagerly listen to lies, attentive to those who are too arrogant to come to you. They distort the Scripture, taking rulings out of context, then say, “If this is the ruling you get ˹from Muḥammad˺, accept it. If not, beware!” Whoever Allah allows to be deluded, you can never be of any help to them against Allah. It is not Allah’s Will to purify their hearts. For them is disgrace in this world, and they will suffer a tremendous punishment in the Hereafter." Quran 5:41

[@shabibrishad6079]

@@truthspeaker2405 Quran 2:79 here you go

[@tatooinenative860]

I love how he doesn’t learn and just keeps repeating the same inane drivel all over again. Anyone with a basic understanding of Islam would know that we don’t affirm the Jewish and Christians scriptures. The fact that David apparently doesn’t know that, despite his “years” of googling -I’m sorry- “studying” Islam, really deals a blow to his image and reputation. But then again, his content is so bad he practically makes fun of himself. Keep up the good work akhi. JazakAllahu khairan

[@Synocra]

hes just producing trash and feeding his fanbase and they gobble it up like its 5 star gourmet

[@tatooinenative860]

@@Synocra they ignore the stench and try to convince themselves they aren’t eating *hit lmao

[@1001011011010]

He does know that, which is why it is a "dilemma" where either side is supposed to be bad. The "dilemma" is that a Muslim must: 1) Fully accept the previous Scriptures mentioned in the Qur'an Or 2) Not fully accept the previous Scriptures mentioned in the Qur'an He further argues that 1 leads to contradictions with Islamic teaching, and that 2 leads to contradiction with the Qur'an. This dilemma, like other supposed dilemmas, can be resolved by rebuking the assumptions that make up the argument. So, for instance, if one can interpret the previous Scriptures mentioned in the Qur'an as being in line with Islam, then the dilemma is refuted. Likewise, if one can demonstrate that the Quran does not say the previous Scriptures are preserved, the dilemma is refuted. Tl;dr: Wood knows the common Muslim belief of tahrif but rejects it as meaning textual corruption as he thinks it goes against the Qur'an. The dilemma is refuted by refuting the premises/arguments used to build it up, rather than accepting the terms of the dilemma in the first place.

[@tatooinenative860]

@@1001011011010 he isn’t talking about the previous scriptures. He is talking about the Christian and Jewish scriptures, which aren’t the actual Scriptures Allah revealed. He is referring to the stuff humans wrote (the Bible etc), not the Injeel or Torah revealed by Allah. His “dilemma” literally collapses on itself before he’s done stating his first premise. What a joke.

[@algilani-military]

@@1001011011010what the heck are you talking about that nothing you said makes sense First we believe that the scripture were did tharif and the injeal is lost and the tankah was changed by the jews in the bayblan And you guys accuse that the jews changed and hide Prophecy about jeuse

[@hamzanabeel8347]

If you read this say alhamdullilah

[@Sherif.1988]

Astakhfurallah

[@ayadali9112]

Alhamdulillah

[@IramFathima-je6ov]

alhamdulliah

[@Badri31333]

اَلحَمْدُلِله

[@TheJiminiflix]

Alhumdili--------LAH! LAH is your pagan Egyptian moon god idol.

[@terryibrahim6534]

Seriously this can be answered verbally in less than 10 seconds. Islam says the old scriptures are corrupted but not debased hence we are instructed to affirm what agrees with the Quran and reject what does not, noting that principles always stay the same

[@harold2]

What does debased mean? Can you elaborate your answer? From my own understanding, the Christian and Jewish Scriptures are affirmed by the Quran as the words of Allah, and the words of Allah cannot be corrupted. Therefore a Muslim cannot say that the Scriptures today are corrupted (and Allah's words are then corruptible), neither can they say it is the true word of God because then Islam will be false.

[@terryibrahim6534]

@@harold2 debased meaning totally corrupted, as in everything in it is a lie. So if you didn’t know what I meant by debased now you know so if you read my initial response you will hopefully have a clearer understanding

[@gurutruthspeak598]

@@harold2 The christian and jewish 'scriptures' do not befit an Almighty God of immeasurable power, knowledge and wisdom. In fact, it doesn't even befit a human of average intelligence! Your so-called scriptures have been so heavily fabricated/edited/revised, even your textual critics admit the originals are lost and there's no chance of ever seeing them again!!! Now compare this with the Qu'ran, its origins, the fact that it was delivered through an unlettered individual who had no capability of producing anything like it, transcribed over two decades, entirely around his life, unparalleled in structure, entirely immutable and NOT A SINGLE EXAMPLE OF A CORRUPTION OR ANY REVISED EDITION IN ITS ENTIRE 1400-year history! This is the ONLY source that befits the majesty of the Almighty creator of the Universe!!!

[@harold2]

@@terryibrahim6534 but still, the Christian Scriptures being partially corrupted means that Allah's words can be corrupted. Can Allah's words be corrupted?

[@gurutruthspeak598]

@@harold2 Well that depends on what Allah originally intended - For these to be preserved until doomsday, or for something else entirely... Whenever the Qu'ran quotes the Prophets of old, we see them exclusively addressing their people, whereas the Qu'ran, addresses the human race DIRECTLY! So the point about "Allah's words can be corrupted" simply falls apart... Until you can demonstrate that the Qu'ran HAS BEEN CORRUPTED... GOOD LUCK! 😉

[@B-Mike]

The biggest stumbling block is the definition of Injil mentioned in Quran. It is supposed to be a book revealed to Jesus, it certainly is not the New Testament which was written by unknown authors about 60 years after Jesus’s death. Gospel of John was written a100 years after the death of Jesus.

[@boriserjavec6470]

Who wrote the quran?

[@gurutruthspeak598]

​@@boriserjavec6470Authored by Almighty Allah, the creator of the Universe and all that's in it, dictated by his Messenger Muhammed, Saws, and transcribed by his companions and scribes RA. Who wrote your bib... Never mind. You don't know anything.

[@letmetalk2240]

They don't even have the Gospel according to Mary, Jesus' mother.

[@1.N.Decent]

​@@boriserjavec6470You're asking the wrong question.

[@boriserjavec6470]

@@gurutruthspeak598 well allah didn't write the quran, who wrote the quran? Give me the names

[@hellothere9407]

Never forget that Christians believe that God sacrificed himself to himself to forgive his mistakes to himself with the rules he made up himself with prior knowledge that they would be broken

[@theastronomer5800]

Irrelevant to the argument. All religions have silly teachings, it doesn't change the fact that the Quran says nonsense about the earlier scriptures and Muslims today say things that contradict their best scholars (whom they always tell people to read).

[@Zebhammer]

That is called straw-manning.. you completely misrepresent Christianity and then attack the misrepresentation. I shouldn't be surprised. Have you heard that Muhammad walked in on Zainab, the wife of Zayed, his adopted son, triggering their divorce? She was partially clothed and he was aroused because she was apparently very beautiful. When he subsequently married her, Allah excused him as an example for all men who wanted to marry the divorced wife of their adopted sons. Long queue there.. not. A little while later, Allah does away with adoption altogether to cover his tracks. The difference between your story and mine is that this story is found in your sources.

[@hellothere9407]

@@Zebhammer >Y-you're strawmanning noooo!!! That's literally what you do 24/7, cope and seethe

[@Zebhammer]

@@hellothere9407 Are you a Muslim or an atheist?

[@Deznuts69]

The only exception is that God never made any mistakes, nor did he have to forgive himself it was God who voluntarily sacrificed himself for the sake of humanity, not himselfThe only exception is that God never made any mistakes, nor did he have to forgive himself

[@moizahmed4705]

Christians: "Qur'an affirms the Bible" Me: We Muslims have absolutely no problem accepting anything in the Bible which is affirmed by the Qur'an ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[@TheJiminiflix]

I found out that the most preferred fruit of Muslims is the cherry. To them, nothing is better than a good cherry pick. 😊

[@NCSiebertdesign]

Therefore Quran is the most corrupted & self contradicted book on the planet.

[@moizahmed4705]

@@TheJiminiflix Ironic coming from a Christian 😊

[@rafia1698]

@@TheJiminiflix says the one who eats corrupted cherries… (Bible) May Allah guide you

[@gurutruthspeak598]

​@@TheJiminiflix Hey deluded dude, try, just TRY to make your beliefs fit around your wildly inconsistent bible... Make any of the 4 accounts of the crucifixion & resurrection line up like they were inspired to different writers by the SAME HOLY GHOST! THAT'S A CHALLENGE!!! GO!

[@Oraf843]

Hey Farid, there's no honesty in your assessment so you end up conflating multiple issues. If you don't fully understand the Islamic Dilemma, how can you debunk it?

[@assassinwithalqalam]

And he responded 😄 I ask Allah to reward you ameen

[@PseudoSpaceMarine]

Already? I guess David stalks Farid's channel like an obsessed ex. 😂

[@assassinwithalqalam]

@@PseudoSpaceMarine no I meant Farid responded lol

[@PseudoSpaceMarine]

@@assassinwithalqalam Ah ok.

[@carlosibarra4041]

MUSLIMS CALL " CHRISTIAN PRINCE"

[@israfilangel8062]

Bruh still listening to that fool? 😂😂

[@carlosibarra4041]

@@israfilangel8062 THE PRINCE. 👍

[@letmetalk2240]

@@carlosibarra4041 CP can only fool imbeciles. lol

[@omarosama155]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@carlosibarra4041]

@@omarosama155 CALL CHRISTIAN PRINCE OR REPENT! GOD'S JUDGEMENT AND WRATH IS COMING.

[@TheDragonaf1]

I was in a lecture with Sheik Asrar Rashid. Doesnt the aribic in the verse he is reffering to tell you the difference (linguistically the Torat and Ingeel are desribed as revelations that occurred directly and all in one go whilst the arabic discribing the quran at the end of verse expalins it as a revelation that happened over time)?

[@TheRayanKhan]

Keep up the good work, Farid. May Allah bless you for this great work.

[@Draezeth]

Farid is either stupid or lying. Possibly a mix of the two. David quotes the Muslim sources more than Farid does, and Farid doesn't even understand the argument.

[@majormomo7401]

Been watching you since early/mid-2020, every time I randomly come back it's interesting to see how different your setup looks lol

[@majormomo7401]

May Allah reward you for your good work in da'wah, you were a major inspiration to start learning more about this deen when I first started taking it seriously

[@thecrow6388]

This is another good example of the deception of the deceiver Farid. He says that he is going to "present multiple arguments" that the former scriptures (Torah and Bible) have been corrupted according to the quran. Note that this is a GENERAL statement, indicating that there is a whole lot of corruption in the Bible according to the quran. But, in good Farid fashion, before going to Farid's main argument, let's comment on him saying in time stamp 5:32 that "there are no verses in the quran that will make these direct claims like, ehhh, the Injeel is preserved...so the most that David is going to get...of which the quran speaks positively of what's included in the Taurah and the Injeel". In good Deedat fashion I would like to ask where in the quran it says in unequivocal terms, using these words, that the Torah and the Bible have been corrupted? Anyone wanna give it a try? On the other hand, though, the quran refers to the Torah and the Bible as books that are between their hands (present, not pas tense). David Wood quotes quran 5:47, saying that "Let the people of the Gospel judge by what God has sent down therein". But if the Gospel was corrupted a long time ago (as Farid and other Muslims claim), why would allah ask Christians, in his revelation to Muhammad, to judge by a book that is corrupted? Is allah stupid or what? Farid then claims that this verse refers to a time before Islam was revealed. But that does not make any sense whatsoever, because why would allah reveal the quran now and say this while he is actually talking about the past? Moreover, don't Muslims like to tell us that Jesus and the prophets before him were all Muslims? I've said it before and I say it again, the stupidity of Muslims is legendary. Then his alternative argument, which he calls "another interpretation" is that verse refers to "following everything in the Torah and the Injeel, including following Muhammad". But we all know that we don't find Muhammad anywhere in the Bible, no matter how many Muslims have tried - we can find countless KZbin videos from Muslims trying to do so. In short, Farid's argument is not just weak it's non-existent really and he is (as always) grasping at straws to try to reinterpret a verse that is very clear in what it says - just as David Wood pointed out. Then, when he finally comes to David Wood's central argument, Farid uses (misuses) a verse to "prove" that the Bible has been corrupted, according to the quran. He mentions surah 5:41, which states that "They (Jews) distort words beyond their [proper] usages (Sahih Int.) or "changing words from their context". The tafsir show that this is specifically about "changing the traits and description of Muhammad and the legal ruling on the stoning of married people who commit adultery" (see Tafsir Ibn Abbas). In short, he uses a verse that is only about 2 specific things and makes it sound to his listeners that this is proof that the entire Torah and Injeel have been corrupted. In other words, he is deceives by generalizing the specific. The truth is that Farid is the one who is corrupting his own book and his own tafsir. Farid the Deceiver shows us once again that, if we look into detail into his claims, we find that he cannot refute David Wood who is quoting the quran correctly. The only thing he does is misleading his followers, all 700000 of them, by twisting the words of the quran and the Tafsir, because he knows they (his followers) won't check his arguments anyway. But it doesn't work with me as I have proven countless times. Muslims should know better, because their own "god" (allah) has said that "None can change His Words" (surah 6115).

[@majormomo7401]

calm down nerd@@thecrow6388

[@abdot604]

@@thecrow6388 too lazy to respond to everything so i'll go for the corruption. the quran is true, the quran contradicts the bible in serval places thus the bible was corrupted. also there's almost a consciences among Christian scholars that the bible was corrupted.

[@theastronomer5800]

Imagine that you're not religious, but simply interested in history. You read the following Islamic sources. Are you going to go around saying that the Quran is perfectly preserved today? It is reported from Ismail ibn Ibrahim from Ayyub from Naafi from Ibn Umar who said: "Let none of you say 'I have acquired the whole of the Qur'an'. How does he know what all of it is when much of the Qur'an has disappeared? Rather let him say 'I have acquired what has survived.'" (as-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur'an, p.524). Ibn Umar was a companion of Muhammad. Abu Musa al-Ash'ari, one of the early authorities on the Qur'an text and a companion of Muhammad, is reported to have said to the reciters of Basra: We used to recite a surah which resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bara'at. I have, however, forgotten it with the exception of this which I remember out of it: "If there were two valleys full of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley, and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust". ( Sahih Muslim, Vol. 2, p.501). Abu Musa went on to say: We used to recite a surah similar to one of the Musabbihaat, and I no longer remember it, but this much I have indeed preserved: 'O you who truly believe, why do you preach that which you do not practise?' (and) 'that is inscribed on your necks as a witness and you will be examined about it on the Day of Resurrection'. (as-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur'an, p.526). Zirr ibn Hubaish reported: "Ubayy ibn Ka'b said to me, 'What is the extent of Suratul-Ahzab?' I said, 'Seventy, or seventy-three verses'. He said, 'Yet it used to be equal to Suratul-Baqarah and in it we recited the verse of stoning'. I said, 'And what is the verse of stoning'? He replied, 'The fornicators among the married men (ash-shaikh) and married women (ash-shaikhah), stone them as an exemplary punishment from Allah, and Allah is Mighty and Wise."' (As-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur'an, p.524) It was narrated that 'Aishah said: “The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.” These verses were abrogated in recitation but not ruling. Other ahadith establish the number for fosterage to be 5. - Hasan Ibn Majah 1944 A'isha (Allah be pleased with, her) reported that it had been revealed in the Holy Qur'an that ten clear sucklings make the marriage unlawful, then it was abrogated (and substituted) by five sucklings and Allah's Apostle died and it was before that time (found) in the Holy Qur'an (and recited by the Muslims). - Sahih Muslim 1452a Abu Ubaid in his Kitab Fada'il-al-Qur'an says: Ibn Abi Maryam related to us from Ibn Luhai'a from Abu'l-Aswad from Urwa b. az-Zubair from A'isha who said, "Surat al-Ahzab (xxxiii) used to be recited in the time of the Prophet with two hundred verses, but when Uthman wrote out the codices he was unable to procure more of it than there is in it today." From Masud, whom Muhammad said to learn the Quran, we learn about Uthman's Quran: Mas'ud disliked Zaid bin Thabit copying the Musahif, and he said: 'O you Muslim people! Avoid copying the Mushaf and the recitation of this man, by Allah, when I accepted Islam he was but in the loins of a disbelieving man' - meaning Zaid bin Thabit - and it was regarding this that 'Abdullah bin Mas'ud said: 'O people of Al-'Iraq! Keep the Musahif that are with you, and conceal them. For indeed Allah said: And whoever conceals something, he shall come with what he concealed on the Day of Judgement (3:161). - Sahih Jami at-Tirmidhi 3104 The idea that the Quran is perfectly preserved is purely a theological one. Dr. Ally, a well known Muslim scholar, explains that scholars never held the "perfect preservation" view. He references the Sana'a as an example, and explains that only average Muslims without bothering to learn parrot the perfect preservation idea.

[@a12ja34r]

Don’t u find it amazing that people like u can just cherry pick Hadiths, and try to disprove the preservation of the Quran, when all these information were written and preserved by Muslims themselbes😂😂😂. That just shows how honest Muslims were. Now regarding everything u have just stated, all of this is known by Muslim scholars and all has been answered. Simply search for it snd you’ll find it

[@a12ja34r]

Also actually to help u feel better, there are more Hadiths about the Surahs being abrogated, and Surahs which had certain verses which were “forgotten”. Actually farid made a vid on this please find it and watch it.

[@theyoungdaee7155]

Farid is a beast. May Allah reward him with Jannah!

[@Draezeth]

He's a liar and a fool. He doesn't even understand the argument, and he cherry picks all his Qur'an verses. In this video, he even denies the Qur'an! He says there are no verses that affirm the Injeel and Torah, but David Wood *quotes* them in the video he's responding to! Always fact-check your da'ees. They're counting on you not doing so.

[@kawseralam5969]

Beast means animal. Best.

[@EslamNawito]

🔥INTRO 😂 If its not in the current "Gospels" or the "Torah" then they are definitely NOT ENTIRELY what Allah revealed Upon Moses & Jesus May peace & Blessings be on them. Where is the good news about a prophet called "Ahmed"? They just slapped the books names & authors on whatever tradition they chanced upon LITERALY. Also 6:55 What made David Think the Gospel & Torah in the middle east in the 7th century CE is the same as todays? The Torah of that time & place was restricted to the scholars Amongst the Levites in Arabia~ the rest only knew bits & pieces! The prophet Commanded the Sahaba to learn Hebrew & Syriac for negotiation purposes Now They claim they are the PEOPLE OF THE BOOK yet want to judge by the Sharia of Islam because its more lenient?!!! NOPE, make do with what you have if you are certain its the truth~ that is SARCASM of the flawed logic they have

[@Ahmad62637]

2:03 What about Bukhari saying the Torah and Injeel were only corrupted by meaning ? He did have this position right?

[@M7md-3la2]

Source?bcz the same bukhari quotes ibn Abbas saying the books aren't preserved (not just meaning)

[@Ahmad62637]

It’s well known that Bukhari had this position and I think he said it in his Sahih.. It’s written in Islamweb but I don’t know the exact source yet. And btw he was wrong on this subject.

[@estonian44]

can u use dark mode?

[@mesbahzahed8537]

Thank you brother Farid for your response. May Almighty Allah increase your knowledge.

[@thecrow6388]

This is another good example of the deception of the deceiver Farid. He says that he is going to "present multiple arguments" that the former scriptures (Torah and Bible) have been corrupted according to the quran. Note that this is a GENERAL statement, indicating that there is a whole lot of corruption in the Bible according to the quran. But, in good Farid fashion, before going to Farid's main argument, let's comment on him saying in time stamp 5:32 that "there are no verses in the quran that will make these direct claims like, ehhh, the Injeel is preserved...so the most that David is going to get...of which the quran speaks positively of what's included in the Taurah and the Injeel". In good Deedat fashion I would like to ask where in the quran it says in unequivocal terms, using these words, that the Torah and the Bible have been corrupted? Anyone wanna give it a try? On the other hand, though, the quran refers to the Torah and the Bible as books that are between their hands (present, not pas tense). David Wood quotes quran 5:47, saying that "Let the people of the Gospel judge by what God has sent down therein". But if the Gospel was corrupted a long time ago (as Farid and other Muslims claim), why would allah ask Christians, in his revelation to Muhammad, to judge by a book that is corrupted? Is allah stupid or what? Farid then claims that this verse refers to a time before Islam was revealed. But that does not make any sense whatsoever, because why would allah reveal the quran now and say this while he is actually talking about the past? Moreover, don't Muslims like to tell us that Jesus and the prophets before him were all Muslims? I've said it before and I say it again, the stupidity of Muslims is legendary. Then his alternative argument, which he calls "another interpretation" is that verse refers to "following everything in the Torah and the Injeel, including following Muhammad". But we all know that we don't find Muhammad anywhere in the Bible, no matter how many Muslims have tried - we can find countless KZbin videos from Muslims trying to do so. In short, Farid's argument is not just weak it's non-existent really and he is (as always) grasping at straws to try to reinterpret a verse that is very clear in what it says - just as David Wood pointed out. Then, when he finally comes to David Wood's central argument, Farid uses (misuses) a verse to "prove" that the Bible has been corrupted, according to the quran. He mentions surah 5:41, which states that "They (Jews) distort words beyond their [proper] usages (Sahih Int.) or "changing words from their context". The tafsir show that this is specifically about "changing the traits and description of Muhammad and the legal ruling on the stoning of married people who commit adultery" (see Tafsir Ibn Abbas). In short, he uses a verse that is only about 2 specific things and makes it sound to his listeners that this is proof that the entire Torah and Injeel have been corrupted. In other words, he is deceives by generalizing the specific. The truth is that Farid is the one who is corrupting his own book and his own tafsir. Farid the Deceiver shows us once again that, if we look into detail into his claims, we find that he cannot refute David Wood who is quoting the quran correctly. The only thing he does is misleading his followers, all 700000 of them, by twisting the words of the quran and the Tafsir, because he knows they (his followers) won't check his arguments anyway. But it doesn't work with me as I have proven countless times. Muslims should know better, because their own "god" (allah) has said that "None can change His Words" (surah 6115).

[@wakib7066]

Salam could you make a video about more instances where the quran corrects the old scripture I find it really interesting and it goes on to show precision of the quran in knowedge of old scripture

[@aseefi]

My favorite is correcting the incorrect narrative in Genesis about the creation of the universe and Earth and saying the universe was created in 6 days. And the earth in 2 days. This aligns with the ratios of the Age of Earth and Universe found via scientific observations perfectly.

[@bilalafzal7442]

you could check out ManyProphetsOneMessage

[@wakib7066]

@@aseefi how does this exactly correct the genesis narratove

[@aseefi]

@wakib7066 ok copy pasting a post I wrote while back: Found this UNDENIABLE proof with my own original research :) "Indeed, your Lord is Allah, who created the heavens and the earth in six days and then established Himself above the Throne, arranging the matter \[of His creation\]..." Quran 10:3 "Say, "Do you indeed disbelieve in He who created the Earth in two days and attribute to him equals...?" Quran 41:9 Why is this important? Universe-Earth age ratio according to Quran: 6:2 or 3:1. Age of Earth according to science: 4.543 ± 0.05 billion years Age of Universe according to science: 13.787 ± 0.020 billion years Universe-Earth age ratio according to science: 3.03678:1 (Margin of error included: 2.9993 to 3.0750) Note 0: "Six days" does not necessarily mean six 24-hour days in the Arabic language. It can be understood to mean a period of time and that's a perfectly valid interpretation in the Arabic Language. Note 1: Relative to the age of the Earth, the times humans have been around is negligible because we have been around for a few hundred thousand years. I did the math and as long as Adam (AS) came to Earth with in the last 6 million years, and this margin of errors are correct, the math actually checks out perfectly fine. Note 2: When do we consider the Earth "created"? When the oceans first appeared? When the first life appeared? When there was first oxygen in the atmosphere? We are assuming that what is meant by God “created” the Heavens and the Earth in 6 days is how long it took for the Universe to be ready for Humans (e.i just before the creation of Adam). Safe assumption because this is explicit in at least the Abrahamic texts like Genesis. Note 3: Genesis’ account for the creation of Earth is completely different (and contrary) to the Islamic view. For details lookup and read Gensis chapter 1. But its still interesting to see how the Quran is 100% on mark. Tell that to those who accuse us of "plagiarizing the Bible". Note 4: It is utterly illogical to say Quran got the numbers right by a coincidence. What are the chances that by some random chance the ratio of the age of the Universe and Earth ended up being exactly 3 (with in the margin of error), and what are the chances the Quran also chose those numbers by coincidence. And mind you the margin of error is VERY small.

[@lets_wrapitup]

@@aseefiyou need to learn to familiarise yourself with the material you criticise, before you criticise it… The word for ‘day’ in both the Quran and genesis, is ‘yom’.

[@hglundahl]

3:24 You don't know how it works? For one thing, it directly states that it is in the Gospel, for another, it doesn't say, nor does any other verse of the Quran say, that the Christians forged the text of their Gospels.

[@muxeng977]

We believe in an uncorrupt Torah and gospel that was corrupted These verses aren't found in the Torah and the gospel of today according to Farid ( although there are instances where they can be found, maybe he just agrees with David to be convenient ), therefore, the Torah and gospel of today are corrupted.

[@moizahmed4705]

The Book of Exodus tells us that Pharaoh’s magicians were able to imitate the miracles of Moses: *Moses and Aaron did just as the Lord had commanded. He raised his staff in the presence of Pharaoh and his officials and struck the water of the Nile, and all the water was changed into blood. The fish in the Nile died, and the river smelled so bad that the Egyptians could not drink its water. Blood was everywhere in Egypt. But the Egyptian magicians did the same things by their secret arts, and Pharaoh’s heart became hard; he would not listen to Moses and Aaron, just as the Lord had said. Instead, he turned and went into his palace, and did not take even this to heart. [Exodus 7:20-23]* Miracles are events that are supposed to stand out from the norm and serve as undeniable proofs that a Prophet has genuinely been sent by God. If Magicians can replicate the miracles of God then how are we to distinguish true Prophets from the false? Does this not mean that Pharaoh was justified in rejecting Moses’ claims of Prophethood, given that his court magicians could replicate his miracles? Egypt was a land of magic, so why wouldn’t God equip Moses with miracles that far exceeds the capabilities of its magicians? This seriously calls into question God’s wisdom. The Biblical narrative is also problematic from the point of view of the Israelites. Put yourself in the shoes of the average Israelite slave in Egypt. Moses, hiding in the wilderness for 40 years, suddenly appears to you out of nowhere, and not only makes the grand claim of being a Prophet, but also tells you that you are obliged to follow him. You ask Moses for proof of his claims, and he proceeds to show you signs that are no different and no more impressive than a common Egyptian magician. Why should you risk your life by following Moses and rebelling against Pharaoh? Again, this seriously calls into question God’s wisdom. By contrast, the Qur’an says that Pharaoh’s magicians were overwhelmed by the miracles of Moses: *[Pharaoh] said, “If you have come with a sign, then bring it forth, if you should be of the truthful.”* *So Moses threw his staff, and suddenly it was a serpent, manifest. And he drew out his hand; thereupon it was white [with radiance] for the observers.* *Said the eminent among the people of Pharaoh, “Indeed, this is a learned magician who wants to expel you from your land [through magic], so what do you instruct?” They said, “Postpone [the matter of] him and his brother and send among the cities gatherers who will bring you every learned magician.”* *And the magicians came to Pharaoh. They said, “Indeed for us is a reward if we are the predominant.” He said, “Yes, and, [moreover], you will be among those made near [to me].”* *They said, “O Moses, either you throw [your staff], or we will be the ones to throw [first].” He said, “Throw,” and when they threw, they bewitched the eyes of the people and struck terror into them, and they presented a great [feat of] magic.* *And We inspired to Moses, “Throw your staff,” and at once it devoured what they were falsifying. So the truth was established, and abolished was what they were doing. And Pharaoh and his people were overcome right there and became debased.* *And the magicians fell down in prostration [to God]. They said, “We have believed in the Lord of the worlds, The Lord of Moses and Aaron.” [7:106-122]* We can see that as soon as the magicians witnessed the miracles of Moses they immediately accepted that he was a genuine Prophet and submitted to God. Thus the truth was made manifest to not only Pharaoh but all the people of Egypt including the Israelites. In the Qur’an God tells us that He will never allow falsehood to overcome the truth: *No! We hurl the truth against falsehood, and truth obliterates it- see how falsehood vanishes away! [**21:18**]*

[@NCSiebertdesign]

Quran is simply a fan fiction of the bible. Muhammad had really wet dream while Aisha was still 6 y.o. lying with him.

[@exposingcrossdogtianity]

The BiBULL is a rip off of every pagan mythology and has pornographic chapters probably due to the fact that YHWH had a wet dream of himself sleeping with his 32 little virgins while his wife Asherah watched.​@@NCSiebertdesign

[@letmetalk2240]

@@NCSiebertdesign Quran is the Book full of signs. We see the TRUE SIGNS of it.

[@letmetalk2240]

@@Glory_be_to_Christ Quran 56:77-79 This is an honorable Quran. In a protected book. None can grasp it except the sincere.

[@thecrow6388]

This is another good example of the deception of the deceiver Farid. He says that he is going to "present multiple arguments" that the former scriptures (Torah and Bible) have been corrupted according to the quran. Note that this is a GENERAL statement, indicating that there is a whole lot of corruption in the Bible according to the quran. But, in good Farid fashion, before going to Farid's main argument, let's comment on him saying in time stamp 5:32 that "there are no verses in the quran that will make these direct claims like, ehhh, the Injeel is preserved...so the most that David is going to get...of which the quran speaks positively of what's included in the Taurah and the Injeel". In good Deedat fashion I would like to ask where in the quran it says in unequivocal terms, using these words, that the Torah and the Bible have been corrupted? Anyone wanna give it a try? On the other hand, though, the quran refers to the Torah and the Bible as books that are between their hands (present, not pas tense). David Wood quotes quran 5:47, saying that "Let the people of the Gospel judge by what God has sent down therein". But if the Gospel was corrupted a long time ago (as Farid and other Muslims claim), why would allah ask Christians, in his revelation to Muhammad, to judge by a book that is corrupted? Is allah stupid or what? Farid then claims that this verse refers to a time before Islam was revealed. But that does not make any sense whatsoever, because why would allah reveal the quran now and say this while he is actually talking about the past? Moreover, don't Muslims like to tell us that Jesus and the prophets before him were all Muslims? I've said it before and I say it again, the stupidity of Muslims is legendary. Then his alternative argument, which he calls "another interpretation" is that verse refers to "following everything in the Torah and the Injeel, including following Muhammad". But we all know that we don't find Muhammad anywhere in the Bible, no matter how many Muslims have tried - we can find countless KZbin videos from Muslims trying to do so. In short, Farid's argument is not just weak it's non-existent really and he is (as always) grasping at straws to try to reinterpret a verse that is very clear in what it says - just as David Wood pointed out. Then, when he finally comes to David Wood's central argument, Farid uses (misuses) a verse to "prove" that the Bible has been corrupted, according to the quran. He mentions surah 5:41, which states that "They (Jews) distort words beyond their [proper] usages (Sahih Int.) or "changing words from their context". The tafsir show that this is specifically about "changing the traits and description of Muhammad and the legal ruling on the stoning of married people who commit adultery" (see Tafsir Ibn Abbas). In short, he uses a verse that is only about 2 specific things and makes it sound to his listeners that this is proof that the entire Torah and Injeel have been corrupted. In other words, he is deceives by generalizing the specific. The truth is that Farid is the one who is corrupting his own book and his own tafsir. Farid the Deceiver shows us once again that, if we look into detail into his claims, we find that he cannot refute David Wood who is quoting the quran correctly. The only thing he does is misleading his followers, all 700000 of them, by twisting the words of the quran and the Tafsir, because he knows they (his followers) won't check his arguments anyway. But it doesn't work with me as I have proven countless times. Muslims should know better, because their own "god" (allah) has said that "None can change His Words" (surah 6115).

[@shazadster]

Alhamdulillah! BarakAllahu feekum!

[@user-tf7mz9dk9g]

Please do a video on the very minute differences between Shia and Sunni and what issues this causes, to educate non muslims

[@Noobmaster-dc6ne]

Bro the Quran saying the gospel not gospels how they make this arguments out of nowhere the mean one but we know that there'r multiple gospels such as gospel of John or Mathew or Luke etc. how they don't understand that what Quran says personally for me it's so clear and easy to understand

[@Greyz174]

Was there a secret fifth document that Muhammad was referencing?

[@Noobmaster-dc6ne]

@@Greyz174 no but there was real or original gospel in that time along with fake ones for example there's Rolex watches which is magnificent and very expensive but you can get fake Rolex for like 20 dollars and both of them are coexist

[@Greyz174]

@@Noobmaster-dc6ne where did it go lol

[@kawseralam5969]

Original ingeel was in Aramaic language not in Greek.

[@Overawed]

GUYS!!! FARID JUST UPLOADED

[@Truth_Seeker1]

5:47 says wat God sent down not what ppl wrote down and claimed it’s from God. That’s what the majority of your gospels are, 5:48 says the Quran is a guardian over the previous scriptures.

[@ps1746]

Nice video habibi. Looking forwarded to the next episode!

[@thecrow6388]

This is another good example of the deception of the deceiver Farid. He says that he is going to "present multiple arguments" that the former scriptures (Torah and Bible) have been corrupted according to the quran. Note that this is a GENERAL statement, indicating that there is a whole lot of corruption in the Bible according to the quran. But, in good Farid fashion, before going to Farid's main argument, let's comment on him saying in time stamp 5:32 that "there are no verses in the quran that will make these direct claims like, ehhh, the Injeel is preserved...so the most that David is going to get...of which the quran speaks positively of what's included in the Taurah and the Injeel". In good Deedat fashion I would like to ask where in the quran it says in unequivocal terms, using these words, that the Torah and the Bible have been corrupted? Anyone wanna give it a try? On the other hand, though, the quran refers to the Torah and the Bible as books that are between their hands (present, not pas tense). David Wood quotes quran 5:47, saying that "Let the people of the Gospel judge by what God has sent down therein". But if the Gospel was corrupted a long time ago (as Farid and other Muslims claim), why would allah ask Christians, in his revelation to Muhammad, to judge by a book that is corrupted? Is allah stupid or what? Farid then claims that this verse refers to a time before Islam was revealed. But that does not make any sense whatsoever, because why would allah reveal the quran now and say this while he is actually talking about the past? Moreover, don't Muslims like to tell us that Jesus and the prophets before him were all Muslims? I've said it before and I say it again, the stupidity of Muslims is legendary. Then his alternative argument, which he calls "another interpretation" is that verse refers to "following everything in the Torah and the Injeel, including following Muhammad". But we all know that we don't find Muhammad anywhere in the Bible, no matter how many Muslims have tried - we can find countless KZbin videos from Muslims trying to do so. In short, Farid's argument is not just weak it's non-existent really and he is (as always) grasping at straws to try to reinterpret a verse that is very clear in what it says - just as David Wood pointed out. Then, when he finally comes to David Wood's central argument, Farid uses (misuses) a verse to "prove" that the Bible has been corrupted, according to the quran. He mentions surah 5:41, which states that "They (Jews) distort words beyond their [proper] usages (Sahih Int.) or "changing words from their context". The tafsir show that this is specifically about "changing the traits and description of Muhammad and the legal ruling on the stoning of married people who commit adultery" (see Tafsir Ibn Abbas). In short, he uses a verse that is only about 2 specific things and makes it sound to his listeners that this is proof that the entire Torah and Injeel have been corrupted. In other words, he is deceives by generalizing the specific. The truth is that Farid is the one who is corrupting his own book and his own tafsir. Farid the Deceiver shows us once again that, if we look into detail into his claims, we find that he cannot refute David Wood who is quoting the quran correctly. The only thing he does is misleading his followers, all 700000 of them, by twisting the words of the quran and the Tafsir, because he knows they (his followers) won't check his arguments anyway. But it doesn't work with me as I have proven countless times. Muslims should know better, because their own "god" (allah) has said that "None can change His Words" (surah 6115).

[@elyasahmadzai2]

@@thecrow6388stop spamming, we have dealt with these arguments. Watch Jason skywalker he made an hour long video debunking David’s nonsense. Lastly the prophet (saw) is very much mentioned in the modern day torah.

[@thecrow6388]

@@elyasahmadzai2 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣You are kidding, right? David Wood is showing what the Islamic sources say and you are debunking David Wood? If you think you debunk David Wood who is showing the quran and the hadith, then you are in actual fact debunking Islam! Thanks for that. And Muhammad is in the "modern day" torah? You gotta be real dumb, because there is no "modern day" torah and Muhammad isn't in the torah or anywhere else. There is not even independent proof that the Muhammad of Islam actually ever lived. In fact, there is not even any independent evidence that Mecca existed during the time that Muhammad supposedly lived there. It doesn't appear on maps from that time. It is not mentioned in description of trade routes. No archeological findings have been done there. And so I can go on and on. If Mecca did not exist in the time of Muhammad (or at least the time he is said to have lived there), then the implication is that Islam is false. You don't even need to go to the sources like David Wood and others do. I suggest you dig a little in the history of Islam and I challenge you to find independent sources to verify that Mecca existed. I promise you, you will be very surprised. Islam is as false as anything could ever be!

[@phun1901]

I think you might not yet understand the Islamic dilemma - you seem to think you need to highlight that the Quran is incongruous with the torah or Injeel. That's a point that polemicists are trying to highlight when they make the Islamic dilemma argument. That's literally the whole point. Look at the Baha'i faith, it claims to be congruent with the Quran but it isn't. And that's exactly the problem. That's their Baha'i dilemma. The problem is that the Quran claims to be congruent when it clearly isn't. As for Jews who change the scriptures - the internal evidence suggests that refers to a specific sect, not that the Torah is corrupt. And as far as i can tell S 61:6 says Jesus confirmed the Torah during his lifetime. And we know the Torah we have today is the same as it was during Jesus' lifetime.

[@letmetalk2240]

>>>>>>>>And as far as i can tell S 61:6 says Jesus confirmed the Torah during his lifetime. ====================================================== Quran 61:6 And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." If you want to take Quran 61:6 as valid to justify the Torah you have it today, so it should be a valid claim also for you when Jesus foretold the coming of the final prophet after him.

[@phun1901]

@@letmetalk2240 they is contingent on the Torah actually prophesying Mohammed, which it doesn't. I assume you are thinking of deut 18:18, the phrase "from among your brothers" means an Israelite. The same phrase is used for the requirements to be a king of Israel. David was an Israelite. The deut 18:18 prophet also had to be an Israelite. They also need to fulfil Deut 34:10.

[@letmetalk2240]

@@phun1901 Actually, my point is that since you wanted to validate the claim that the Torah is the same as the one in Jesus' time by taking Quran 61:6 as the proof, then you should also take the coming of the final prophet as foretold by Jesus in Quran 61:6 as gpod. For the phrase "from among your brothers" it can also refers to the Arabs as well. Israelites are generations from Isaac while Arabs are generations from Ishmael. Isaac and Ishmael are brothers.

[@letmetalk2240]

@@phun1901 >>>>They also need to fulfil Deut 34:10. ================================ Care to explain.

[@phun1901]

@@letmetalk2240 right, well if the Quran was consistent with the Torah that Jesus is said to have confirmed, same one we have today, then that is one hurdle checked, and it would be possible that Mohammed was prophet. The internal consistency would be unbroken. I don't need to accept that S 61:6 really is correct before I scrutinise it. Deuteronomy 34:10-12 is the end of the book, it says the prophet like Moses had not appeared yet, and it describes what he will be like. Knowing God face to face, do many miracles and mighty deeds in the sight of Israel. Jesus was the prophet like Moses. The gospel of John Chapter 5 Jesus said that Moses wrote about him. If you have an interest for learning more about how Christians see Jesus as fulfilling this prophecy, Mike Winger has a really good video about the ways Moses is a type of Jesus (that basically means that Moses whole life was a clear foreshadowing of Jesus life). It's almost an hour long, but he is a really good communicator.

[@thegoblin957]

4.52 the whole argument is based on presumption

[@mhamedekhiel8700]

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي بارك الله فيك وجزاك الله خيرا علي كل كلمة واضحك لنا عليه مع كفر الغبي بكتابه هههههههه 😅😅😅😅

[@Hazem-rz4hd]

Here’s the thing Farid, Allah uses specific wording…. He says let them judge by what was ‘revealed by Allah’. The gospels that we have today have unknown authors and conflicting accounts indicating they aren’t pure. The other books like acts and the letters of Paul are not from Allah and even Christian’s know this and yet they call it ‘Gods word’. Allah constantly tells the polytheists and others in the Quran that they need to provide proof that whatever they follow is from God. So a Christian would need to demonstrate how the 4 gospels are truly inspired by God. I don’t see how Luke writing to theophilus indicates his intention to write divinely inspired literature. It’s also worth noting that the gospels are a multiplicity. Whereas what Jesus revealed was singular (Injil). And the Quran defines that the Injil consisted of Jesus changing some rules, reuniting the spirit of the law with the letter, reminding the Jews of the hereafter and judgement day which they had downplayed, and telling them of someone to come after he goes. That is the true Gospel. And while we do see semblances of that within what we call the ‘Gospels’ today, it’s clear they don’t have divine authority as Allah himself never revealed it. It’s clear that the true scripture is lost. It worth noting many ‘gospels’ existed and many are gone or hidden away. There were dozens of accounts on the life of Jesus circulating in the first few centuries AD, but they all became stamped away and considered unpopular. The ones we see today were simply chosen by those who believed Jesus to be God. They did not follow what God had revealed but rather their own desires. When Allah calls Christians to judge by the Injil he also says to judge by what God has revealed. This should therefore make a Christian think ‘Are the Gospels really from God? Is there an Isnad? Who wrote them? Any secular scholar will tell you the Gospels today were not fully maintained and were not written by eye witnesses of Jesus. The truer Jewish Christian sects that existed like the Ebionites did not follow the mainstream books of Christian’s we see today. They may very well have had the true message of Jesus. We know James the Just (‘brother of Jesus’) was the head of the Jerusalem church in the early years after Jesus rose, and we can be certain that he was not reading the book of John but rather something else that likely doesn’t exist anymore. Therefore THAT message, would be considered the true message of Jesus that was spread early on but later stifled by the Catholic Church and early Gentile Christian’s who preferred the Pauline message which rapidly spread and became the chosen sect for the Roman Empire. This included preferring the gospels we are familiar with over other ones. But that isn’t to say these gospels are completely devoid of truth. There’s definitely something valuable in them (not Paul’s letters tho) but it’s not something considered reliable as Allah certainly didn’t reveal it directly. Therefore in conclusion, Allah only endorses what was revealed by him. So Jews and Christians are encouraged to undergo a reflection process to try and understand what was revealed by God and what was either changed or added by men. If one can separate the wheat from the chaff, then by all means judge by those books. But if you cannot verify or find them, then know the Quran is the only extant revelation left.

[@AaA-ry2zs]

So, by your logic, Allah revealed the Injil, and the Christians *altered* it? Meaning they took the words of Allah and *altered* them? Meaning Surah 6:34 is wrong in saying that none can alter the words of Allah?

[@Hazem-rz4hd]

@@AaA-ry2zs At least check the Surah and Ayah before you go posting. The fact is Allah allowed the previous revelations to be altered. If you think that they are perfectly preserved you’d be insane. There are verses added and taken out in the New Testament. And the Old Testament has no memorizers. There is no doubt that they’ve changed. And that’s ok because they weren’t revelations for all of mankind. Zoroaster is most likely a messenger but God knows best. Nonetheless it’s clear his message has also been changed compared to the original. That’s because they came for a specific people. Jesus came for the ‘lost sheep of Israel.’ Not all of mankind. God will judge those who didn’t have prophets (ahl fatrah) differently than those who heard the message. It’s real simple. Islam is pure monotheism. You either accept it as your heart knows God is one, or you don’t out of ignorance (which may be excusable as God will judge), or you reject out of arrogance. There’s only one religion that I can see that reflects that truth. The fact is I don’t need to go and start nitpicking at all the details of a religion. Some people say ‘there’s thousands of religions and they all claim to be right, how am I supposed to know what’s true’. You and I go back and forth on scripture and history where we may just agree to disagree. And there was a time where I felt compelled to tackle every criticism and clear the misconception. But then I came to learn that faith in God is not a gamble. We weren’t left to guess and not use the intellect we are given. God is purely a logical and self explanatory reality. Nothing else makes more sense. I can literally sit in a dark room without talking to others and conceive of what God is and isn’t based on pure reasoning. God is one, eternal, the necessary uncaused cause, all powerful, not bound by time and matter. And there’s only one religion that reflects that perfectly. All others falls short, it’s really that simple. I don’t need to read the vedas, or the Bible or the Dhamma pada in full detail. You can scrutinize the Quran all you want, but you probably haven’t read it in full. And millions of Islamic scholars have read it hundreds of times. Do you really think something as silly was what you cited exists as a glaring issue without anyone noticing? And what you cited isn’t even applicable as the right verse. Like I said, Allah is speaking about his verbatim words in the Quran. Most previous scriptures weren’t verbatim words of God and they were allowed to be changed as they were meant for a specific time and place. But again I don’t need to go there personally. Humans have innate things they’re born with. Nobody taught you the law of non contradiction. Nobody taught you that things in this universe are subject to cause and effect. You were born knowing that. And countless studies have demonstrated kids born even in atheistic environments have an innate knowledge of the divine and what attributes go along with that. Only one faith perfectly aligns with that. That’s why I am a Muslim. I’m not here to argue about science in the Quran or anything else. Although I believe those things have value, I know something that gives me certainty. Every other religious belief goes against the innate knowledge humans are given. And you will only see that if you’re being honest with your soul.

[@tubba-dg7to]

But the trouble with your logic is that muhammad revealed these verses in the 7th century and said of the injeel " that which they have with them". By that time in history these apocryphal gospels and sects had largley dissapeared.the Christian audience who heard these words in the 7th century would have understood the gospel to be todays Books of mathew, mark, luke and John. Have you ever heard of the the principle of Okhams Razor? Look it up on Google! Which is more likely to be true? That all knowing God was actually referring to an another gospel that was so obscure and rare rhat there is no written or verbal record of it today and he just failed to clarify that? Or is it more likely that the quran was actually written or put together by muhammad a semi literate camel trader who had just picked up some snips and snatches of Christian and Jewish scripture and folklore and only had a vague understanding of the theology?

[@eagle36791]

just because a document claims to be well preserved does not mean it does have truth. It could just be a bunch of lies that has being well preserved....

[@Salhem]

When all "holy" books claim to be incorruptable and untouchable by change yet is proven corrupted and self-contradictory and another holy book claims the same claims and is proven correct then those who assumed other books holy should follow this truthful one as it fulfills the requirements of being holy, those who do not consider any of the above holy are not targeted by this argument, they're dealt with in another manner

[@letmetalk2240]

@efh3679 Don't be butthurt when Quran is the only Book preserved and safeguarded against corruption. Does it have truth in it? Many have discovered the truth. Do your own research. When you do it with sincerity, surely you will feel the truth.

[@condorianonegdiffsgoku]

You missed the most explicit hadith. Indeed they lie about the prophets just like how they had distorted their scripture. إنهم يكذبون على الأنبياء كما حرفوا كتابهم

[@letsplaygame443]

Bro really pull out the woman drees point 😂.

[@djazairion6200]

May Allah reward u, اللهم صل و سلم على نبينا محمد❤

[@imbrod]

So this is your debunking, Farid? You quote some verses from the Bible (as Exodus 4:6) and then you state some related verse from Quran? Wow, what a great tactics. Good luck retelling me the story - and its morals - about Jacob's son Joseph, using just Quran, not Bible.

[@letmetalk2240]

>>>>the story - and its morals - about Jacob's son Joseph, using just Quran, not Bible. ========================== When the basis is from the Quran, he gave you the Islamic perspective. Anything wrong?

[@imbrod]

@@letmetalk2240 Please point me to the story in Quran

[@letmetalk2240]

@@imbrod Quran has a chapter named Yusuf. Anything wrong?

[@imbrod]

@@letmetalk2240 What is your question? Do I agree that Quran corrects the Bible? Quite the opposite, Bible is so rich, intelligent, versatile, inspiring, with many details on many events - such as Joseph story. What does Quran teach Muslims about Joseph, about brotherhood and forgiveness? Just that the brothers jumped in the sacks.

[@letmetalk2240]

@@imbrod Quran has a chapter named Yusuf. Anything wrong?

[@theauthenticdeen]

Ma Sha Allah

[@nashside5669]

David David David ohhh poor David oh oh oh

[@AdrianMuslim]

Brother you should name these videos with the Title of the argument so it’s easier to find later when needed.

[@moizahmed4705]

Even in the Torah, Jewish understanding is that three men who visited Abraham were Angels. Why are they called Yahweh? This is actually an example of the principle of Sheliah. Under the Jewish law of Agency, a Sheliah is a legal representative or agent of a person who carries out the authorised tasks of the person and is considered to be the person that they represent. In the case of this verse, it just means that the representatives of God, in this particular case the guests of Abraham, are speaking on behalf of God and are thus spoken of as if they are God. This is in fact a common occurrence throughout the Old Testament. In many places it speaks about the agents of God as if they are God Himself. A good example is the Book of Exodus: *This is what the Lord says: By this you will know that I am the Lord: With the staff that is in my hand I will strike the water of the Nile, and it will be changed into blood. The fish in the Nile will die, and the river will stink; the Egyptians will not be able to drink its water.’”* *The Lord said to Moses, “Tell Aaron, ‘Take your staff and stretch out your hand over the waters of Egypt-over the streams and canals, over the ponds and all the reservoirs-and they will turn to blood.’ Blood will be everywhere in Egypt, even in vessels of wood and stone.”* *Moses and Aaron did just as the Lord had commanded. He raised his staff in the presence of Pharaoh and his officials and struck the water of the Nile, and all the water was changed into blood. [Exodus 7:17-20]* Here we can see that God states: *“with the staff that is in my hand I will strike the water of the Nile”.* Even though God speaks of Himself striking the Nile with a staff, the action itself is actually carried out by Aaron who acts as God’s agent: *“Moses and Aaron did just as the Lord had commanded. He raised his staff in the presence of Pharaoh and his officials and struck the water of the Nile”* The Old Testament clearly shows that the one with the authority behind a person is credited to the “work” even if they themselves have not personally carried it out. It would be absurd in this instance to literally equate the hand and staff of Aaron to those of God. Other good examples of Sheliah are the numerous instances throughout the Old Testament where an angel is described as God. Here when Moses spoke to God in the burning bush we are told that it was actually an angel who was speaking: *There the angel of the Lord appeared to him in flames of fire from within a bush. Moses saw that though the bush was on fire it did not burn up. [Exodus 3:2]* The angel proceeds to speak as if it were God speaking to Moses in the first person: *When the Lord saw that he had gone over to look, God called to him from within the bush, “Moses! Moses!”* *And Moses said, “Here I am.” “* *Do not come any closer,” God said. “Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy ground.”* *Then he said, “I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob.” At this, Moses hid his face, because he was afraid to look at God.* *The Lord said, “I have indeed seen the misery of my people in Egypt. I have heard them crying out because of their slave drivers, and I am concerned about their suffering. So I have come down to rescue them from the hand of the Egyptians…” [Exodus 3:4-8]* Christians should note that this is confirmed in the Book of Acts: *This is the same Moses they had rejected with the words, “Who made you ruler and judge?” He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush. [Acts 7:35]* Again, it would be absurd in this instance to literally equate the voice of the angel with that of God.

[@AbduAlrahman19]

Wa aleik al salaam Hadith Mushrik

[@Lowkick11]

Mashallah brother

[@dismantler4545]

He makes the argument that since the Quran confirms the previous scriptures, how come they go against what the Quran teaches. He is making an argument based on nothing more than misunderstanding. The Quran confirming previous scriptures does not mean that those previous scriptures have been preserved. The Torah and Gospel are confirmed revelations from God, but that does not imply that they are preserved. There is no such implication given that they are preserved, as stated they are confirmed previous revelations. The same God who revealed both the Torah, and Gospel, revealed the Quran. The confirmation reveals that the previous scriptures are revealed from the one God who revealed the Quran. We know that the Torah, and Gospel have been tampered and changed. Side note: I find that christian saying they do not pick and choose from their faith is annoying. in fact if you were to refer to apostate laws (deuteronomy 13:10) from the old testament they would say: "oh but the old testament is abrogated", they constantly reject the old testament due to not liking it. another example is that Jacob (peace be upon him) married multiple wives. yet they are opposed to the idea of marrying multiple wives. not due to scriptural reasons, but rather secular. another example is child marriage, rabbis believe that Isaac (peace be upon him) married rebecca when she was 3, yet they do not like it so reject it. many examples, but here are a handful. point being if they do not like something from the old testament they say that it is no longer applied, as if this somehow is an argument. we Muslims however do not pick and choose from our scripture. he made a false allegation without any proof.

[@dismantler4545]

continuation: From this hadith the following is stated: “The people of the Scripture (Jews) used to recite the Torah in Hebrew and they used to explain it in Arabic to the Muslims. On that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Do not believe the people of the Scripture or disbelieve them, but say:-- "We believe in Allah and what is revealed to us." (2.136)(Sahih al-Bukhari 4485). What do we learn from this statement, not to believe them or disbelieve? Do we learn that the Torah is preserved? No, we are told not to believe them or disbelieve, rather to say “we Believe in Allah and what is revealed to us.”(2:136) in the full context we know that confirmation of previous scriptures does not entail that they are preserved. wood is asserting something without any evidence at all.

[@youssef.sarhan]

Note David woods hand gesture in the last few seconds of this video. These are called “Devil’s Horns”. Very deviant.

[@shidqy0003]

David Charcoal

[@arcticmist1193]

brother you look like a young Yusuf Islam (Cat Stevens) :)

[@FreePalestine_____]

*Here is Quran saying the Gospel and the Torah is corrupted:* Quran 5:13-15 "But for breaking their covenant We condemned them and hardened their hearts. *They distorted the words of the Scripture* and *neglected a portion of what they had been commanded to uphold.* You ˹O Prophet˺ will always find deceit on their part, except for a few. But pardon them and bear with them. Indeed, Allah loves the good-doers. And from those who say, "We are Christians" We took their covenant; but *they forgot a portion of that of which they were reminded.* So We caused among them animosity and hatred until the Day of Resurrection. And Allah is going to inform them about what they used to do. O People of the Book! Now Our Messenger has come to you, *revealing much of what you have hidden of the Scriptures* and *disregarding much.* There certainly has come to you from Allah a light and a clear Book."

[@TheRockeyAllen]

This is his favourite argument? Such a weak and moot argument. That's their level.

[@thecrow6388]

Really??? Are you sure??? This is another good example of the deception of the deceiver Farid. He says that he is going to "present multiple arguments" that the former scriptures (Torah and Bible) have been corrupted according to the quran. Note that this is a GENERAL statement, indicating that there is a whole lot of corruption in the Bible according to the quran. But, in good Farid fashion, before going to Farid's main argument, let's comment on him saying in time stamp 5:32 that "there are no verses in the quran that will make these direct claims like, ehhh, the Injeel is preserved...so the most that David is going to get...of which the quran speaks positively of what's included in the Taurah and the Injeel". In good Deedat fashion I would like to ask where in the quran it says in unequivocal terms, using these words, that the Torah and the Bible have been corrupted? Anyone wanna give it a try? On the other hand, though, the quran refers to the Torah and the Bible as books that are between their hands (present, not pas tense). David Wood quotes quran 5:47, saying that "Let the people of the Gospel judge by what God has sent down therein". But if the Gospel was corrupted a long time ago (as Farid and other Muslims claim), why would allah ask Christians, in his revelation to Muhammad, to judge by a book that is corrupted? Is allah stupid or what? Farid then claims that this verse refers to a time before Islam was revealed. But that does not make any sense whatsoever, because why would allah reveal the quran now and say this while he is actually talking about the past? Moreover, don't Muslims like to tell us that Jesus and the prophets before him were all Muslims? I've said it before and I say it again, the stupidity of Muslims is legendary. Then his alternative argument, which he calls "another interpretation" is that verse refers to "following everything in the Torah and the Injeel, including following Muhammad". But we all know that we don't find Muhammad anywhere in the Bible, no matter how many Muslims have tried - we can find countless KZbin videos from Muslims trying to do so. In short, Farid's argument is not just weak it's non-existent really and he is (as always) grasping at straws to try to reinterpret a verse that is very clear in what it says - just as David Wood pointed out. Then, when he finally comes to David Wood's central argument, Farid uses (misuses) a verse to "prove" that the Bible has been corrupted, according to the quran. He mentions surah 5:41, which states that "They (Jews) distort words beyond their [proper] usages (Sahih Int.) or "changing words from their context". The tafsir show that this is specifically about "changing the traits and description of Muhammad and the legal ruling on the stoning of married people who commit adultery" (see Tafsir Ibn Abbas). In short, he uses a verse that is only about 2 specific things and makes it sound to his listeners that this is proof that the entire Torah and Injeel have been corrupted. In other words, he is deceives by generalizing the specific. The truth is that Farid is the one who is corrupting his own book and his own tafsir. Farid the Deceiver shows us once again that, if we look into detail into his claims, we find that he cannot refute David Wood who is quoting the quran correctly. The only thing he does is misleading his followers, all 700000 of them, by twisting the words of the quran and the Tafsir, because he knows they (his followers) won't check his arguments anyway. But it doesn't work with me as I have proven countless times. Muslims should know better, because their own "god" (allah) has said that "None can change His Words" (surah 6115).

[@thecrow6388]

@@killerbee6484 The Injeel and the Torah are not old? Many, you have no clue what you are talking about! The quran verse tells you that the Torah was given to Moses more than a thousand years BC! 🤦‍♂ And Jesus was born more than 600 years before your so-called "prophet" Muhammad. And you say that the Injeel and the Taurat are not old.🤦‍♂ Moreover, you use the quran as evidence of the truthfulness of the quran. That's a classic fallacy. The stupidity of Muslims is legendary, and you prove it once again. And then you dare to say that David Wood's argument is weak? 🤦‍♂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@maksim3417]

He got much better arguments

[@thecrow6388]

@@maksim3417 If you mean David Wood, then I agree. His arguments follow straight from the quran and the hadith.

[@SohailAh46]

Never fail to give a LOL moment in the end habibi 😂😂😂

[@fuad01]

Every time David talks. Farid: someone please fetch my belt😂

[@user-bq4vh2hv8k]

Why always Islam can he not talk about other religions. Always Islam.

[@badsamurai11]

because there's only one true religion of the God

[@thehangedman9042]

The verses in Surah al maida say: Let the people of the Gospel judge by WHAT GOD HAS SENT DOWN therein. and not by what is therein. and god reinforces it again by saying whosoever judges not by which GOD HAS SENT DOWN it is they who are iniquitous (not by what is in the gospel). so god is telling them to judge by what he has revealed originaly.

[@AnnaBlessed777]

3 words to debunk the "muh bible has been corrupted myth" : *DEAD SEA SCROLLS* "set of ancient Jewish manuscripts. *Dating from the 3rd century BCE to the 1st century CE* " Literally on Wikipedia - google it. Who wrote the Quran and when? lol

[@thehangedman9042]

@@AnnaBlessed777 yeah which were hidden since their discovery and "released" to the public 50 years later only for people to find out that all of the scrolls released to public and given to american and europian museums were fake and the originals are hidden by the israeli goverment and not yet released. Not suspicious at all.

[@Draezeth]

Let me dumb this down to a logical syllogism: A. The Qur'an claims to affirm the torah and gospel. B. The Qur'an directly contradicts the torah and gospel. C. Therefore, the A is a false claim. D. Therefore, the Qur'an contains falsehood. E. Therefore, the Qur'an cannot be from God. And Farid responds to this by saying "How can A be true if B is true?!" Do you see it now? Have I dumbed this down enough for you to see the problem? For those who still havent gotten it, I'll dumb it down even more: *Farid just affirmed point C. He just affirmed David's argument.*

[@FaridResponds]

You are presupposing A.

[@supersoda5748]

@FaridResponds Because the Qur’an itself presupposes A. Why don’t you respond to David and actually engage with his arguments this time

[@dom3073]

@@supersoda5748 No Quran is talking about the Scriptures given directly to the Prophets themselves not what Christians have in their hands today. Two different things.

[@supersoda5748]

⁠@@dom3073that’s not what your prophet or Quran say

[@flaming3624]

It's even crazier considering we have copies that predate Muhammad

[@windblownleaf6450]

The quran affirms the scriptures at the time of mohammad. We have scriptures around today which would have been present at the time of mohammad, or even earlier. Both the dead sea scrolls and codex sinaticus predate mohammad.

[@sunwukong32]

Try actually watching the video.

[@windblownleaf6450]

@@sunwukong32Try actually debunking my argument.

[@sunwukong32]

@@windblownleaf6450 why would I waste my time It's in the video.

[@windblownleaf6450]

Farid's argument is based on a lie. He tries to spin it in a way that depicts the Torah and Gospels being imperfect at mohammad's time, but allah allowing people to go forth in that falsehood (despite his word apparently being incorruptable). So nothing has been debunked.

[@M7md-3la2]

​@@windblownleaf6450the prophet said "they lie about the prophets just as they changed his scriptures" Too explicit to spin The "Islamic dillema" is literally 1. ignoring texts that debunks you 2. Interpret others in a way that suits you You can't refute a religion you aren't actually presently correctly The "Islamic dillema" was also debunked in details with references by a channel called "Jay Skywalker" It's over an hour long Try watching it and address the arguments there

[@Sagemaze]

Buddy, all you did was confirm that the Qur’aan is Absolutely ignorant towards the scriptures… saying „the Qur’aan says that“ doesn’t prove the Bible wasn’t preserved… the Qur’aan tries to establish a continuity with prior scripture, and fails massively cause the author of wich, only knew False stories like The clay bird of jesus one, and very basic theology, sometimes not even that.

[@Eeangi]

I think a point made by David is what does the Quran say about preservation of the Bible, not about was actually it corrupted or preserved

[@hamdibeekeeper]

From god but doesn't want to abide to it. Who is god to david wood? Simply a sacrifice?

[@kawseralam5969]

Allah never mentions Gospel/nt but Ingil. Bible & Ingil are not same.

[@riyaznaghi1198]

Good job bro jaza Allah khair

[@woodlandbiker]

The Torah, Zabur and Gospel are in the Bible, not the Quran. The Quran clearly distinguishes between “the previous Scriptures” and itself. If these books are sent by the same Lord, every time you claim the Bible has been corrupted, the implications are: 1. Allah is a weak god. He couldn’t protect his previous revelations from being corrupted by weak humans, or he must have gained power through time, such that he is “now able” to protect his last book which he couldn’t do for the previous books. Such a god is not worthy of our worship. 2. Allah is unjust. He didn’t care about people being misled by corrupt or false revelations, yet he wants to punish individuals who follow them - knowing full well that his negligence caused the books to be corrupted (or lost). Now where is the guarantee that the Quran too will not be corrupted since “the same Lord” has allowed the Torah, Injil and Zabur to be corrupted? How can you trust Allah to protect the Quran if he was too weak to protect the others? It makes no sense. Who knows, maybe Allah has even sent a 5th revelation to correct the Quran? Could that be the gospel of Barnabas? Or Bahau’llah’s book?

[@globalislamicreminders]

Farid can you make a video addressing all the biggest allegations disbelievers make about islam

[@thecrow6388]

This is another good example of the deception of the deceiver Farid. He says that he is going to "present multiple arguments" that the former scriptures (Torah and Bible) have been corrupted according to the quran. Note that this is a GENERAL statement, indicating that there is a whole lot of corruption in the Bible according to the quran. But, in good Farid fashion, before going to Farid's main argument, let's comment on him saying in time stamp 5:32 that "there are no verses in the quran that will make these direct claims like, ehhh, the Injeel is preserved...so the most that David is going to get...of which the quran speaks positively of what's included in the Taurah and the Injeel". In good Deedat fashion I would like to ask where in the quran it says in unequivocal terms, using these words, that the Torah and the Bible have been corrupted? Anyone wanna give it a try? On the other hand, though, the quran refers to the Torah and the Bible as books that are between their hands (present, not pas tense). David Wood quotes quran 5:47, saying that "Let the people of the Gospel judge by what God has sent down therein". But if the Gospel was corrupted a long time ago (as Farid and other Muslims claim), why would allah ask Christians, in his revelation to Muhammad, to judge by a book that is corrupted? Is allah stupid or what? Farid then claims that this verse refers to a time before Islam was revealed. But that does not make any sense whatsoever, because why would allah reveal the quran now and say this while he is actually talking about the past? Moreover, don't Muslims like to tell us that Jesus and the prophets before him were all Muslims? I've said it before and I say it again, the stupidity of Muslims is legendary. Then his alternative argument, which he calls "another interpretation" is that verse refers to "following everything in the Torah and the Injeel, including following Muhammad". But we all know that we don't find Muhammad anywhere in the Bible, no matter how many Muslims have tried - we can find countless KZbin videos from Muslims trying to do so. In short, Farid's argument is not just weak it's non-existent really and he is (as always) grasping at straws to try to reinterpret a verse that is very clear in what it says - just as David Wood pointed out. Then, when he finally comes to David Wood's central argument, Farid uses (misuses) a verse to "prove" that the Bible has been corrupted, according to the quran. He mentions surah 5:41, which states that "They (Jews) distort words beyond their [proper] usages (Sahih Int.) or "changing words from their context". The tafsir show that this is specifically about "changing the traits and description of Muhammad and the legal ruling on the stoning of married people who commit adultery" (see Tafsir Ibn Abbas). In short, he uses a verse that is only about 2 specific things and makes it sound to his listeners that this is proof that the entire Torah and Injeel have been corrupted. In other words, he is deceives by generalizing the specific. The truth is that Farid is the one who is corrupting his own book and his own tafsir. Farid the Deceiver shows us once again that, if we look into detail into his claims, we find that he cannot refute David Wood who is quoting the quran correctly. The only thing he does is misleading his followers, all 700000 of them, by twisting the words of the quran and the Tafsir, because he knows they (his followers) won't check his arguments anyway. But it doesn't work with me as I have proven countless times. Muslims should know better, because their own "god" (allah) has said that "None can change His Words" (surah 6115).

[@profs2981]

@@thecrow6388no one reading all that

[@thecrow6388]

@@profs2981 That shows how interested you are in the truth. 🤦‍♂ The stupidity of Muslims is legendary and they prove it again and again and again........

[@QuranSearchCom]

All previous books, except the Glorious Quran, are not perfect, and are filled with corrupt قول qaowl (doctrines of sayings and writings), and do contain "conflicting doctrines" (51:8, 78:3, 2:59, 2:113, 4:157, 11:110, 41:45). قول in Noble Verses 5:81, 2:59 and 4:157 refers to the corrupt "Bibles" and writings that are based on ample conjectures فبدل الذين ظلموا قولا غير الذي قيل لهم . The previous books also contain ample "conjecture" (4:157, 2:78, 16:64, 10:36, 10:66, 53:28), and also do contain ample "crookedness" عوج and ample "disputes" (3:99, 7:45, 7:86, 11:19, 14:3, 16:124, 18:1, 39:28). The fights between Paul's vs. Peter's teams apostatizing each other (2:253, 43:63-68). The people of the Book are also known to alter and corrupt scriptures: 2:75, 4:46, 5:13, 5:41. But the Scriptures also, nonetheless, contain Divine Truth from GOD via the Prophets' writings (4:157, 2:78, 2:213, 16:43-44, 16:64, 10:36, 10:66, 53:28), and also the uncorrupted GOD's Jewish Law, which is the Thikr of Moses (600+ list of Laws given to Moses), which "the prophets did judge by it" (5:44), that lives there, but the texts are not in their original form. See also Torah's Laws are built entirely on the Book (6:91) انزل الكتاب الذي جاء به موسى the Book was sent to Moses and was brought to the believers by Moses. So for example, the commandment "Do not steal" may not be in its original text and language, but the Law that prohibits stealing lives in it. Allah Almighty Commands the Jews and Christians to interpret their scriptures by the Glorious Quran (27:76, 5:48).

[@QuranSearchCom]

Visit my website. I have detailed all of this.

[@iamk3c397]

👍😎 subhanallah.. more Taufiq from brother Farid.. may Allah give to our brother Farid more Taufiq Hidayah knowledge to counter this laknatullah ..

[@EslamNawito]

11:11 Eww why did you include that?🤮 I am half blind already, you want me to lose my sight entirely bro? Pray for me & our brethren everywhere to be included in God's Mercy & accept us as Martyrs

[@FollowtheSunnah632]

Why are these people such liars? how can they not understand the basics, it's hilarious.

[@uthman2281]

​@@Glory_be_to_Christ According to your opinion.

[@Overawed]

​@@Glory_be_to_Christ I'll ask better questions: how can Christian's follow a God who literally r@ped a 13 year old and gave birth to a son, How can they follow prophets like Isaac who married 3 year old when he was 90, how can they follow prophets like Solomon who had 700 wives, how can they follow a God who went around calling people dog?, And the most important of all how can they believe 3=1???

[@shabibrishad6079]

@@Glory_be_to_Christ i dont see you questioning Isaac PBUH when he got Married to his wife who was 14 as per the bible . Dont you understand societal change

[@theactualuser]

​​@@Glory_be_to_Christ The prophet was allowed to marry more than 4 wives, and that is because he did not marry wives for his desires, he married them for proper logical reasons: to bring peace and love between the tribes, political reasons etc. One of his wives was a jew, while the other wives used to argue with her, the prophet used to defend her. Marrying Aisha was not for satisfaction, but her marrying the prophet led us to having detailed narrations, not to mention the fact how skilled and talented aisha was among all the other men as well when it came to memory/intelligence etc. The prophet never married anyone for the sake of satisfying himself, he never went around and chose specific women to marry. Now my question to you: How can you be a trinitarian? How can you be one when there is not a single verse or an explanation from Jesus, even a hint from Jesus that explains it, neither did paul ever explain or touch on a triune God ever? The people before you [jews] NEVER EVER believed in any triune God let alone worshiped one. How can you sit here and not recognise the fact your christian missionaries are liars to the core?

[@shabibrishad6079]

@@Glory_be_to_Christ he didnt marry more than 4 cause he wanted to . Prophets dont go looking for women the Marriage to more women has logical reason 's first of all every one of the prophets wife was a widow except Aisha r.a and marrying more women connect one to more families which would spread islam faster and Aisha r.a marriage was also logical since there are more than 3000 hadiths which the companions didnt knew which she narrated because she used to live with him

[@MAX-tw3qz]

You just go round in circular reasoning. You haven't shown their arguments false you just drowned them in a word salad dressing.

[@ExposingHindutva101]

Really 🤨🧐

[@Draezeth]

​@@ExposingHindutva101 Yep. Watch the original video, and if you still can't see what Farid missed, watch David's new video on it.

[@ExposingHindutva101]

@@Draezeth I know his nonsense as usual which he repeats everytime... It's the corrupt & self contradicting Biblos which needs correction & confirmation from the Qur'an for it's the Criterion over them. Aal-e-Imran 3:3 نَزَّلَ عَلَيْكَ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ بِٱلْحَقِّ مُصَدِّقًا لِّمَا بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ وَأَنزَلَ ٱلتَّوْرَىٰةَ وَٱلْإِنجِيلَ He has sent down upon you, [O Muhammad], the Book in truth, confirming what was before it. And He revealed the Torah and the Gospel Aal-e-Imran 3:4 مِن قَبْلُ هُدًى لِّلنَّاسِ وَأَنزَلَ ٱلْفُرْقَانَۗ إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا۟ بِـَٔايَٰتِ ٱللَّهِ لَهُمْ عَذَابٌ شَدِيدٌۗ وَٱللَّهُ عَزِيزٌ ذُو ٱنتِقَامٍ Before, as guidance for the people. And He revealed the Criterion [i.e., the Quran]. Indeed, those who disbelieve in the verses of Allah will have a severe punishment, and Allah is Exalted in Might, the Owner of Retribution.

[@backbender8772]

the bible is not a scripture that the quran refers to. the quran refers to the original teachings brought down to Jesus pbuh, which is actually the words of God. It does not refer to a book written 70 years after Jesus pbuh ascension by random writers that we know almost absolutely nothing about. The quran also specifically mentions that the gospel and the torah have been corrupted and changed, so it's clearly referring to the original and correct copy. Thank you for your time and may Allah forgive you and guide you to the right path.

[@backbender8772]

@@ExposingHindutva101 the bible is not a scripture that the quran refers to. the quran refers to the original teachings brought down to Jesus pbuh, which is actually the words of God. It does not refer to a book written 70 years after Jesus pbuh ascension by random writers that we know almost absolutely nothing about. The quran also specifically mentions that the gospel and the torah have been corrupted and changed, so it's clearly referring to the original and correct copy. This means that there are no contradictions/dilemmas in the Quran. Thank you for your time and may Allah forgive you and guide you to the right path.

[@youngclueless7364]

Even if you look at the verse david wood provides, it clearly doesn't support his argument Firstly it specifies judging by "what God has sent down therein". Now you don't even need to mention the lack of preservation of the Bible because Christians don't even believe that the Bible was sent by God in the first place, rather it was written by men who were "inspired by God". Another reason why it doesn't apply to the Bible is because the verse before says that the Gospel was given directly to Jesus (AS) but even Christians will admit that the Bible came long after. This shows that the verse that he himself uses directly opposes his whole argument because it points out that Christians are being "iniquitous" by following a book that wasn't sent down by God. Therefore his whole argument is finished 😂😂

[@fixxzitt]

There’s nothing academic about David and his mates. They are google scholar at best

[@thecrow6388]

This is another good example of the deception of the deceiver Farid. He says that he is going to "present multiple arguments" that the former scriptures (Torah and Bible) have been corrupted according to the quran. Note that this is a GENERAL statement, indicating that there is a whole lot of corruption in the Bible according to the quran. But, in good Farid fashion, before going to Farid's main argument, let's comment on him saying in time stamp 5:32 that "there are no verses in the quran that will make these direct claims like, ehhh, the Injeel is preserved...so the most that David is going to get...of which the quran speaks positively of what's included in the Taurah and the Injeel". In good Deedat fashion I would like to ask where in the quran it says in unequivocal terms, using these words, that the Torah and the Bible have been corrupted? Anyone wanna give it a try? On the other hand, though, the quran refers to the Torah and the Bible as books that are between their hands (present, not pas tense). David Wood quotes quran 5:47, saying that "Let the people of the Gospel judge by what God has sent down therein". But if the Gospel was corrupted a long time ago (as Farid and other Muslims claim), why would allah ask Christians, in his revelation to Muhammad, to judge by a book that is corrupted? Is allah stupid or what? Farid then claims that this verse refers to a time before Islam was revealed. But that does not make any sense whatsoever, because why would allah reveal the quran now and say this while he is actually talking about the past? Moreover, don't Muslims like to tell us that Jesus and the prophets before him were all Muslims? I've said it before and I say it again, the stupidity of Muslims is legendary. Then his alternative argument, which he calls "another interpretation" is that verse refers to "following everything in the Torah and the Injeel, including following Muhammad". But we all know that we don't find Muhammad anywhere in the Bible, no matter how many Muslims have tried - we can find countless KZbin videos from Muslims trying to do so. In short, Farid's argument is not just weak it's non-existent really and he is (as always) grasping at straws to try to reinterpret a verse that is very clear in what it says - just as David Wood pointed out. Then, when he finally comes to David Wood's central argument, Farid uses (misuses) a verse to "prove" that the Bible has been corrupted, according to the quran. He mentions surah 5:41, which states that "They (Jews) distort words beyond their [proper] usages (Sahih Int.) or "changing words from their context". The tafsir show that this is specifically about "changing the traits and description of Muhammad and the legal ruling on the stoning of married people who commit adultery" (see Tafsir Ibn Abbas). In short, he uses a verse that is only about 2 specific things and makes it sound to his listeners that this is proof that the entire Torah and Injeel have been corrupted. In other words, he is deceives by generalizing the specific. The truth is that Farid is the one who is corrupting his own book and his own tafsir. Farid the Deceiver shows us once again that, if we look into detail into his claims, we find that he cannot refute David Wood who is quoting the quran correctly. The only thing he does is misleading his followers, all 700000 of them, by twisting the words of the quran and the Tafsir, because he knows they (his followers) won't check his arguments anyway. But it doesn't work with me as I have proven countless times. Muslims should know better, because their own "god" (allah) has said that "None can change His Words" (surah 6115).

[@theastronomer5800]

Right, except he constantly quotes the most trusted Islamic sources. Here are some good ones about the conservation of the Quran for example: It is reported from Ismail ibn Ibrahim from Ayyub from Naafi from Ibn Umar who said: "Let none of you say 'I have acquired the whole of the Qur'an'. How does he know what all of it is when much of the Qur'an has disappeared? Rather let him say 'I have acquired what has survived.'" (as-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur'an, p.524). Ibn Umar was a companion of Muhammad. Abu Musa al-Ash'ari, one of the early authorities on the Qur'an text and a companion of Muhammad, is reported to have said to the reciters of Basra: We used to recite a surah which resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bara'at. I have, however, forgotten it with the exception of this which I remember out of it: "If there were two valleys full of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley, and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust". ( Sahih Muslim, Vol. 2, p.501). Abu Musa went on to say: We used to recite a surah similar to one of the Musabbihaat, and I no longer remember it, but this much I have indeed preserved: 'O you who truly believe, why do you preach that which you do not practise?' (and) 'that is inscribed on your necks as a witness and you will be examined about it on the Day of Resurrection'. (as-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur'an, p.526). Zirr ibn Hubaish reported: "Ubayy ibn Ka'b said to me, 'What is the extent of Suratul-Ahzab?' I said, 'Seventy, or seventy-three verses'. He said, 'Yet it used to be equal to Suratul-Baqarah and in it we recited the verse of stoning'. I said, 'And what is the verse of stoning'? He replied, 'The fornicators among the married men (ash-shaikh) and married women (ash-shaikhah), stone them as an exemplary punishment from Allah, and Allah is Mighty and Wise."' (As-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur'an, p.524) It was narrated that 'Aishah said: “The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.” These verses were abrogated in recitation but not ruling. Other ahadith establish the number for fosterage to be 5. - Hasan Ibn Majah 1944 A'isha (Allah be pleased with, her) reported that it had been revealed in the Holy Qur'an that ten clear sucklings make the marriage unlawful, then it was abrogated (and substituted) by five sucklings and Allah's Apostle died and it was before that time (found) in the Holy Qur'an (and recited by the Muslims). - Sahih Muslim 1452a Abu Ubaid in his Kitab Fada'il-al-Qur'an says: Ibn Abi Maryam related to us from Ibn Luhai'a from Abu'l-Aswad from Urwa b. az-Zubair from A'isha who said, "Surat al-Ahzab (xxxiii) used to be recited in the time of the Prophet with two hundred verses, but when Uthman wrote out the codices he was unable to procure more of it than there is in it today." From Masud, whom Muhammad said to learn the Quran, we learn about Uthman's Quran: Mas'ud disliked Zaid bin Thabit copying the Musahif, and he said: 'O you Muslim people! Avoid copying the Mushaf and the recitation of this man, by Allah, when I accepted Islam he was but in the loins of a disbelieving man' - meaning Zaid bin Thabit - and it was regarding this that 'Abdullah bin Mas'ud said: 'O people of Al-'Iraq! Keep the Musahif that are with you, and conceal them. For indeed Allah said: And whoever conceals something, he shall come with what he concealed on the Day of Judgement (3:161). - Sahih Jami at-Tirmidhi 3104

[@BazDawah]

JazakAllahu Khair!

[@ezazahmed8379]

Christians say the bibles are supposedly 'eyewitness' accounts from Mathew, Mark, John and whoever else. But I thought the Injeel is supposed to be the revelation Isa (A) received directly from God. I ask christians, how is direct revelation that came to 'Jesus', the same as 'eyewitness accounts'? And the Christians don't claim these accounts to be written versions of the revelation either. How do you expect us to take you seriously with such bad arguments?

[@Greyz174]

Did Isa just leave his own copy of his perfect Islamic revelation at the bus stop? why is there zero evidence of that ever existing lol

[@AnnaBlessed777]

who wrote the quran and when? Were they even "eyewitnesses" of your prophet ? or did they came literally centuries after ? How clueless are you ?

[@AnnaBlessed777]

3 words to debunk the "muh bible has been corrupted myth" : *DEAD SEA SCROLLS* "set of ancient Jewish manuscripts. *Dating from the 3rd century BCE to the 1st century CE* " Literally on Wikipedia - google it.

[@ezazahmed8379]

@annanejjar7143 the Quran was compiled in book format within 2 years of the passing of the Prophet Muhammad pbuh. This was during the rule of the 1st Khaliph Abu Bakr (R). Umar (R) was against the idea as it was something the Prophet of God himself didn't do. But Abu Bakr's reply was "There is good in this."

[@abdoulayediarra8010]

Brother, could you make a video about Abdullah ibn Sad ibn Abi al-Sarh. Nice video. Jazakallah khair

[@FaridResponds]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iom5nZSGa9R3bc0 I did three years ago.

[@abdoulayediarra8010]

@@FaridResponds what so the narrations are from kalbi, a liar? What about the ones from Wikipedia: " Al-Sarh further tested his doubts, with Muslim historians Waqidi, Ibn al-Athir and Tabari writing that Muhammad dictated him: "عليم حکيم" i.e. "Allah is All Knowing All-Wise", which al-Sarh deliberately wrote in the opposite order, i.e. "حکيم عليم, All-Wise All Knowing". He then recited it to Muhammad, who did not detect any changes"

[@FaridResponds]

@@abdoulayediarra8010 There aren't any authentic reports of this occurring with Ibn Abi Sarh. If you believe that there is, then please provide a specific reference w/ page number.

[@RidduRidwanyes]

@@FaridRespondsFarid could you upload a refutation about this some people say the Quran says the moon is a light

[@artanaxhirexha6917]

Ahhahahahha the end was amazing Hammerhead the Xdresser hahah

[@Hamza-iq6gw]

Keep putting your foot on their necks. This refutation channel is helping islam and muslims.

[@smidlee7747]

I think the true God outsmarted men and made sure Surah 5:47 was written in the Quran that tells Christians to obey the gospel. I love watching Muslims trying to explain why Allah told Christians to obey the gospel and have to pretend they are smarter than Allah. God made sure there is no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus. Surah 5:47 reveals those who in Christ have no need for the Quran or Muhammad. I know Muslims wish they could remove Surah 5:47 from the Quran. God overrules man. The corrupted scriptures argument doesn't work since historians have copies of the gospel older than Muhammad. We know what the gospel people had in the 7th century... the same gospel we have today. God will be able to judge Muslims for twisting the words of their own book just as the Quran warns about people corrupting Allah's words. For a Christian since I'm obeying the gospel as Allah tells me to in Surah 5:47 then I can obeying both the gospel and the Quran. I smiled when I read Surah 5:47. "AND NOW THERE'S NO CONDEMNATION. JESUS BLOOD TOOK CARE OF IT ALL. HE SIGNED MY PARDON ONE DAY AT CALVARY WHOM THE SON SETS FREE IS FREE INDEED."

[@siruka6809]

❤❤

[@shahedali02]

7:20 lol just because it says “what God sent down” That’s before it was corrupted 🤣🤣🤣 How dumb can he be ?

[@user-we9lg3ze4i]

بارك الله فيك

[@nadermusa4562]

In legal issues, Jews and Christians living in the Muslim state are not bound by the Islamic law when resolving their own internal affairs. That is how matters were conducted in many parts of the Muslim empire. Dhimmis could deliberate, individualy deny, or reform their religious laws to their liking and to fit their desires without any concern about the laws of the state, so long as no conflict occurred between the 2. The historical, and clear Quranic context of these verses 5:41-50 is that of legal retribution. As stated earlier, it begins by telling the prophet that he was not under any obligation to judge their matters when they came to him insincerely, meaning to seek different and more lenient verdicts than what is found in their traditions. It is to be noted that in matters of equal retribution the Quran says that the oppressed or the victim may show magnanimity and forgiveness in order to grow spiritually, an issue the Torah, which also mentions the law of retaliation, does not contain in its proper context. The passage continues telling the prophet that he may turn them away if he wishes, leaving them to resolve their own disputes. But he is nevertheless to judge between them with equity should he decide so, notwithstanding their severe enmity towards him and the fact they were always plotting with the enemies of Islam with the hope of uprooting and exterminating it. What the prophet did at that point was to masterfully expose them for their corrupt mindframe. Had they came to him in truth, he would have judged them in accordance to the Quran, the last revelation superseding all previous ones. But due to their hypocritical stand towards both the Quran, which they didnt believe in, and their own scriptures, whose clear rulings they denied, he referred them back to the law of their Torah, thereby exposing this double game. One might come back with the question that, if the Torah and Injil are corrupt, as the Quran, traditions and history itself attest, why tell Jews and Christians to judge their own internal affairs in light of those scriptures? The answer is firstly because they are not obligated to believe in anything other than what they want to believe. If it suits them to remain in their faith, despite the Quran coming and exposing their falsehood, then they are free to do so. Second, that corruption is not absolute, the passage itself tells them the Torah and Injil contain guidance and light. How then are they to distinguish the right from the wrong? 5:48"And We have revealed to you, [O Muhammad], the Book in truth, confirming that which preceded it of the Scripture and as a criterion over it". The Quran is the criterion, confirming certain parts OF/MIN those scriptures, ie those parts containing guidance and light. The last revelation came down showing them the truth and falsehood of their books, the abrogated and the valid. This isnt circular reasoning as the things which the Quran confirms from the Bible are for the most part empirically testable, prophecies, past events and stories whose Quranic version make more sense in light of data both external (archaeology, manuscripts etc) and internal (contradictions) to the biblical text that expose the distortions of the transmitters of the Bible. Once again: 1. the Quran clearly says that the corruption of previous scriptures and traditions, canonized or not, is not absolute 2. reference to previous traditions doesnt entail full endorsement or that they are wholly true, just as is the case with the Bible's known use of apocryphal material 3. there is no circularity in determining truth from corruption in light of the Quran, as the parallel passages and references can be for the most part independently attested. When for example a common story or principle is internally and externally contradictory in its biblical version but is internally coherent, consistent philosophically, theologically, ethically, with many times even scientific and archaeological backing in its Quranic version, then the probability is that the Quran is in the right. 4. the Quran doesnt need to go around fact checking everything stated in past written and oral traditions so as to determine which parts in confirms/denies. When broad principles are given, these apply to every relevant part in a previous text/tradition to determine truth from falsehood. Stories common to both the Quran and previous traditions are read in light of the details given in the Quran. 5. then there is the personality of the message bearer, his high degree of credibility among his nation, the miracles he performed, the miraculous aspect of the Quran, still testable today (contrary to prophetic miracles, including those of Moses, Jesus and Muhammad that are lost in time), all major reasons for its contemporaries to pay very close attention to its statements and give it the benefit of the doubt. That is why the Quran then continues saying that, although the option of judging their matters in light of their scriptures if they reject the Quran's authority is their full right, they will be held accountable for it 5:49"And judge, [O Muhammad], between them by what Allah has revealed and do not follow their inclinations and beware of them, lest they tempt you away from some of what Allah has revealed to you. And if they turn away - then know that Allah only intends to afflict them with some of their [own] sins. And indeed, many among the people are defiantly disobedient". As the prophet told Umar "I have come to you with that which is pure and clear proof. And if Musa was alive, and then you were to follow him and abandon following me, you would certainly have strayed". If the last revelation supersedes the previous one even if the previous one is still in its pristine state, delivered by its prophet, then how much more should the Quran be authoritative over the previous revelations in their corrupt state?

[@jobugeorge6578]

If a man speaks truth mixed with lies, will you ever say that I confirm what he says?

[@nadermusa4562]

@jobugeorge6578 yes after showing the truth from falsehood in his previous statement.

[@jobugeorge6578]

@@nadermusa4562 Oh, I see after pointing out the lies you will say he is a truthteller.

[@nadermusa4562]

@jobugeorge6578 as per your analogy, where does the Quran say the Bible is true?

[@jobugeorge6578]

@@nadermusa4562 Here are some verses in Quran that directly and unambiguously says that the pervious scriptures which Jews and Christians had in the 7th Century are approved by Allah as trustworthy. 2: 41 “And believe in what I have sent down (this Qur'an), confirming that which is with you,.....” 2:89 “And when there came to them, a Book (this Qur'an) from Allah confirming what is with them.....,” 2:91 “ ...... And they disbelieve in that which came after it, while it is the truth confirming what is with them....” 2:101 “And when there cometh unto them a messenger from Allah, confirming that which they possess....” 2:113 The Jews say "The Christians have nothing [true] to stand on," and the Christians say, "The Jews have nothing to stand on," although they [both] recite the scripture. 3:81 “.......And afterward there will come unto you a messenger, confirming that which ye possess...” 4:47 O ye unto whom the Scripture hath been given! Believe in what We have revealed confirming that which ye possess.... 21:7 And We sent not before you (O Muhammad) but men to whom We revealed. So ask the people of the Reminder [Scriptures - the Taurat (Torah), the Injeel (gospel)] if you do not know. All the above make sense only if trustworthy copies are available.

[@RafanFarooquib]

I have to be honest tho for ignorant and lay people like me the Islamic dillema is the best argument these missionaries have came up with

[@johnpmead]

You’ve Debunked Nothing.

[@Rotisiv]

You haven’t seen the video have you?

[@johnpmead]

@@Rotisiv Yes, have you?

[@azankahn380]

Ur daddy David wood was debunked stop trying to save him. Name one point farid made

[@azankahn380]

U kuffar can you even name one point farid made? Ur creep David wood can’t save you

[@hollyaldahir5116]

QURAN & SCRIPTURES OF 7TH CENTURY ARABIA: The Quran was not addressing the biblical scripture available today. The Quran addressed the oral and scriptural traditions of the Jewish and Christian tribes and clans inhabiting the 7th Century Arabian Peninsula which included Mandaeans, Manichaeans, Collyridians, various Gnostic sects, Trinitarians, Rabbinical Jewish sects as well as the idol worshippers. These traditions differed widely from the canonical texts accepted into Christianity and Judaism. These religions and their texts were in a state of flux. The differences became more acute as interpretations steeped in Western hellenism were imposed on these Middle Eastern scriptures, which were already imbued with hellenism due to more than 900 years of occupation by the Seleucids, the Ptolemies and the Romans. Add to this the prior influence of the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians and the Persians, the Biblical texts are filled with 'foreign' cultural and linguistic influence, both from the ANE and the West. That is why these texts are so interesting to explore. The Quran has preserved the oral and written traditions of 7th Century Arabian Christians and Jews. This preservation sheds light on the religious traditions that had not yet come under the influence of Rabbinic and Roman attempts at orthodoxy. It is absolutely amazing how the Quran addresses the issues of the Christian and Jewish tribes from their own perspective, so as not to offend members of these sects, but have them focus on the monotheism presented in their own texts. The Quran is amazing!!! It is the prime example of how to approach religious beliefs from an understanding and tolerant point of view. Quran 16:125 says: " Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knows best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance.

[@AnnaBlessed777]

3 words to debunk the "muh bible has been corrupted myth" : *DEAD SEA SCROLLS* "set of ancient Jewish manuscripts. *Dating from the 3rd century BCE to the 1st century CE* " Literally on Wikipedia - google it.

[@_unknown123.]

Mr dawood strike again😂

[@hopeonwheelsindia777]

Summary Quran corrects mistakes in Bible Quran speaks of missing statements from bible Quran accuses jews of manipulations Show me above all you said in quran verse

[@anonymous1531]

1. Qur’an corrects Bible. 5:48 “We have revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺ this Book with the truth, as a confirmation of previous Scriptures and a supreme authority on them.” “Supreme authority” means that the Qur’an is higher in reliability in all measures, so its correction of mistakes is factual. 2. Qur’an speaks of missing statements from the Bible. Elaborate what you mean by that. 3. Qur’an accuses Jews of manipulation. 2:75 “Do you ˹believers still˺ expect them to be true to you, though a group of them would hear the word of Allah [i.e. the Torah] then knowingly corrupt it after understanding it?” Ibn ‘Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him, and Muqatil said: “This was revealed about the seventy men who were chosen by Moses to go with him to Allah, exalted is He. When they went with him to the tryst and heard Allah’s speech, commanding and prohibiting Moses, they returned to their people. Also, Ibn Wahb said that Ibn Zayd commented, يَسْمَعُونَ كَلَـمَ اللَّهِ ثُمَّ يُحَرِّفُونَهُ (used to hear the Word of Allah (the Tawrah), then they used to change it) "They altered the Tawrah that Allah revealed to them, making it say that the lawful is unlawful and the prohibited is allowed, and that what is right is false and that what is false is right. Plus, verses in the Qur’an led the Muslims since the time of the Prophet Muhammad to believe the Bible has been somewhat altered. Abdullah bin `Abbas (May Allah be pleased with them both) who said, ‘O the group of Muslims! How can you ask the people of the Scriptures about anything while your Book which Allah has revealed to your Prophet contains the most recent news from Allah and is pure and not distorted? Allah has told you that the people of the Scriptures have changed some of Allah’s Books and distorted it and wrote something with their own hands and said, ‘This is from Allah, so as to have a minor gain for it. Won’t the knowledge that has come to you stop you from asking them? No, by Allah, we have never seen a man from them asking you about that (the Qur’an ) which has been revealed to you.’ [al Bukhari]. Why did the Sahabah draw this conclusion? Because of this verse: 2:79 “So woe to those who write the "scripture" with their own hands, then say, "This is from Allah ," in order to exchange it for a small price. Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn.”

[@farhat5325]

The bible is a collection of books, most of which with anonymous authors, especially the NT, and the Qur'an speaks of the Torah given to moses a.s and the injeel given to jesus a.s , the Qur'an doesn't speak of the letters of paul or the others.

[@thecrow6388]

And?

[@farhat5325]

@@thecrow6388 what's your question?

[@Greyz174]

What happened to the injeel given to Jesus?

[@farhat5325]

@@Greyz174 that's for you to answer, for you to establish the true revelation to jesus, muslims have the final revelation and are in no need to have the injeel.

[@Greyz174]

@@farhat5325 our answer is that Jesus didnt personally write anything nor was that required because he taught the apostles and sent the Spirit to guide them You have to come up with an answer lol youre the one who has a new religion based on Jesus having a true revelation that confirms Islam and refutes Christianity, but is nowhere to be attested for reasons that you can't explain

[@hglundahl]

6:21 That verse is no problem for either David Wood or me. We don't need to agree that the Bible writes of Mohammed (except in contexts about false prophets). Hence, we are not contradicting ourselves in not becoming Muslims. We are saying this verse contradicts _your_ contention that the Bible was corrupted. I'll give an example from your scholarship. Jesus promised the Parakletos. Your scholarship says Periklytos translates as Mohammed (it does, and so does Lewis / Chlodevech, a king who came to Rheims centuries before Mohammed). So, your scholars have pretended we misplaced the vowels. From the perspective of people mainly familiar with Arabic language and Arabic alphabet, this makes perfect sense. Even more with a Byzantine pronunciation of Greek : very little difference between eta and upsilon, while Mohammed lived or his successors commented. However, Parakletos and Periklytos are two different words. Para and peri are two different prepositions. kalein and kleuo are two different verbs. The compounds are very different in overall meaning, attorney vs famous (which by the way is the meaning of Clovis as well as of Mohammed, as mentioned). So, the argument of wrong interpretation or an innocent forgery by incompetence is replaced by deliberate forgery.

[@BizzBizz69]

Alhamdulilah, may the Almighty increase you always brother Farid. Ameen. Another nonsense argument and video by Wood

[@MrLight-px9xg]

Nice video

[@user-fm7nq7ul2c]

My allah reward you brother farid jannah amen

[@bilalafzal7442]

didn't he make this argument before, dude's running out of ideas.

[@patriciaagbafor6600]

Don't waste your time, you don't have the intelligence to debunk David Wood.

[@user-js7dc6pg6i]

🤔 That's assuming if david has any intelligence. You cant debunk a non intelligent person, its just not possible.

[@_svndae_]

​@@user-js7dc6pg6iDavid knows more than ypu

[@letmetalk2240]

@@_svndae_ really? proof?

[@_svndae_]

@@letmetalk2240 your question proves my point

[@letmetalk2240]

@@_svndae_ proves you are deluded actually.

[@abuzarnizamani6398]

It was me who asked you to make a video on it. On one of your live stream.

[@abdullahwasiq1542]

Fire intro is lit 🔥

[@user-nc3tr2le4q]

Please respond to Sam shamoun

[@FaridResponds]

In regards to what?

[@FreePalestine_____]

*Here is Quran saying Bible is corrupted:* Quran 2:75 "Do you covet [the hope, O believers], that they would believe for you while a party of them used to hear the words of Allah and *then distort the Torah* after they had understood it while they were knowing?"

[@saadsaif-vt7lu]

By davids logic, why is he telling us to judge by the Quran in this case as according to him its not divine? Sounds stupid but thats davids argument.

[@bigbaba6263]

Babe wake up a new farid embarrassing david wood video dropped

[@hollyaldahir5116]

SOME 7th CENTURY CHRISTIAN DOCTRINES ADDRESSED IN THE QURAN: The beliefs of these sects in 7th Century Arabia are referenced in the Quran as the Mandaean name for John the Baptist which was Yahia Yahona (Yahya in the Quran) and the Manichaean Docetic doctrine which states that Jesus was a spirit and not flesh and blood. The Quran addresses this issue in Quran 3:59: Indeed, the example of Jesus to Allāh1 is like that of Adam. He created him from dust; then He said to him, "Be," and he was." So, Jesus is like Adam, in other words, they were both flesh and blood human beings. Another doctrine is the trinitarian doctrine which addressed in Quran 4:171: "O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs." Mandaean doctrine is addressed in Quran 2:138: (As for) Sibghah Allah which Sibghah can be better than Allah's? And we are His worshippers." Sibghah is a Mandaean ritual in which the believer is immersed 3 times in flowing water, like a river. The Mandaeans, known as Subghah in Iraq, were known for this ritual. In this verse, Allah is referring to immersion in Islam, the religion of Allah rather than the watery Mandaean ritual. Collyridians were Mary worshippers. This worship is addressed in 5:116: And [beware the Day] when Allāh will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities besides Allāh?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen."

[@ZackCali]

David wood got his degree from imam google

[@siruka6809]

❤

[@MohammedAlSharif2002]

Finally