Death drive in Lacan (3): Symbolic mortification

  Рет қаралды 5,103

Derek Hook

Derek Hook

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 13
@macguffin8540
@macguffin8540 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this, love your point about a greater power of negation. Your videos and your writing are valued resources.
@the_reality_of_the_virtual3212
@the_reality_of_the_virtual3212 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this great Educational content. Keep on going. ✌️✌️✌️
@ReasonTatters
@ReasonTatters 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Great examples and performance of theory!
@inco9943
@inco9943 4 жыл бұрын
Great lecture
@deathdrivedialectics
@deathdrivedialectics Жыл бұрын
excellent video very helpful
@nikk9277
@nikk9277 4 жыл бұрын
The incessant production of the symbolic seems to be centred in the crosshairs of recently popularised forms of meditation (like body scans, breath work and mindful breathing/listening/eating etc..) Is it naive to see these practices as an attempt to quell or temporarily pacify the death drive by reprioritising the phenomenological and more vital forms of living? If not, do you think they stand a chance? Also, thanks so much for the staggering amount of educational content, I’m really quite grateful!
@derekhookonlacan
@derekhookonlacan 4 жыл бұрын
I think that's an interesting observation. My answer is, possibly. But bear one possibility in mind, those contemplative practices can themselves be subject to a habit forming repetition.
@bradnelsonUS
@bradnelsonUS 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this!!!
@wadesharp8017
@wadesharp8017 9 ай бұрын
I’m having trouble understanding where repetition comes in
@quantumastrologer5599
@quantumastrologer5599 3 жыл бұрын
Outstanding!
@OH-pc5jx
@OH-pc5jx 3 жыл бұрын
I agree that the signifier splits Lacan apart from a certain kind of phenomenology, based on a ‘pure’ or ‘immediate’ or even ‘authentic’ relation of bodies directly to bodies, but on another level you could say that ‘phenomeno-logy’ - the overwriting of the phenomenal world by logos, by the word - stands precisely for the challenge lacan makes to this naive view
@MrKrisstain
@MrKrisstain 3 жыл бұрын
Words will not replace us! Words will not replace us!
@yngdav9784
@yngdav9784 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this very stimulating lecture. I was thinking about the ubiquity of the symbolic order you mentioned. My two cents are as follows: If there's any way in which we can have "direct access" to the world independent of the symbol, it would have to be my means of mindfulness meditation. Successfully done, there are no symbols present within the field of consciousness.
Death drive in Lacan (2): Repetition not biology
18:08
Derek Hook
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Death drive in Lacan (1): Death drive redux
17:11
Derek Hook
Рет қаралды 12 М.
How Strong Is Tape?
00:24
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 96 МЛН
UFC 310 : Рахмонов VS Мачадо Гэрри
05:00
Setanta Sports UFC
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
The Name-of-the-Father (1 of 3): "Who's your daddy?"
19:10
Derek Hook
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Death drive in Lacan (4): Death is not a thing
17:20
Derek Hook
Рет қаралды 4,1 М.
On the symbolic Other (2 of 4) : A second degree of otherness
24:05
The Lacanian Unconscious (4 of 4): The signifying chain
18:39
Derek Hook
Рет қаралды 4,9 М.
Death Drive in Lacan (6): Two forms of life, two forms of death
18:53
On the symbolic Other (1 of 4) : 'The third in any dialogue'
22:11
Foreclosure (1 of 3): This is not repression!
14:28
Derek Hook
Рет қаралды 4,9 М.
Jouissance (2 of 7): Inter-subjective enjoyment
17:20
Derek Hook
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Drives part 1 - Freud's Drive Theory
9:03
Berlin Psychoanalytic
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Death Drive in Lacan (5): Indestructible life
20:27
Derek Hook
Рет қаралды 3,6 М.
How Strong Is Tape?
00:24
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 96 МЛН