Debunking Biggest Myths About Mahabharat - The Real Story | Ami Ganatra on Anvikshiki 28

[@tejasa8429]

Everyone talks about casteism faced by karna but no one talks about the casteist slurs hurled at Dronacharya for being a brahmin in the battlefield😢😢😢😢😢😢.

[@tejasa8429]

@indraneelsarkar8590 In the Kurukshetra war and before the Virat war he was abused constantly that he being brahmin is not fit to fight.He is only fit to teach in schools.

[@tejasa8429]

@indraneelsarkar8590 Yes I know these.But many jai bhim idiots refuse to acknowledge this and play victim card always.

[@tejasa8429]

@indraneelsarkar8590 Yes I know this.But majority of people do not know this.The problem is majority gain knowledge by watching tv serials and came to conclusion. Majority of these jai bhim idiots, leftists will never accept this and play victim card always.

[@ratnamurlidharan9885]

Karna never faced any Caste discrimination....there was no Caste during the Mahabharata period...This is a foreign concept... Parshuram had a school for a particular jaties and Karna told lies to get admission.... even Today if anyone fakes their ID and get admission in the college which is meant for a reserved category then he will be punished...is that discrimination?

[@tejasa8429]

@@ratnamurlidharan9885 Yes you are right.But many jai bhim idiots, leftists will never accept this and play victim card.

[@AnjuSingh-ov2qr]

Please invite j Sai Deepak and Anand Ranganathaan and Vikram sampath 😢

[@phoramtrivedi5600]

Interesting to observe that in Ramayan Lakshman (not a king) takes knowledge from a dying Ravan (a king) And in Mahabharat, Yudhishthir (a king) takes knowledge about Rajdharma from a dying Bhishma pitamah (not a king)

[@giftjunction5228]

According to original texts Ravan died on the spot... There's no mention of Laxman taking knowledge from Ravan... it's just a myth

[@MS-ov9sv]

Some ppl in comment section are responding to their own hypothetical ideas.....no where the guest or host are saying those things....kind of weird .... Ami ji is a well researched scholar....listen with a curious mind

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Thanks a lot for highlighting this

[@gopalverma1689]

@@AnvikshikiWithSatvik aap mujhe bata sakte hai ki ami ji ne konsi Mahabharat follow ki thi please??

[@stranger8893]

@@gopalverma1689 most probably bori ce

[@mithilmehta1501]

@@gopalverma1689 she qoutes from the original Valmiki Ramayan and Ved Vyas Mahabharata

[@abhishekchaubey5959]

Podcast on Gupta Empire please jai hind 😊❤

[@neetakirane8104]

Perfect point about education by the leftists. It's time our education system needs to be changed.

[@Jagannath38103]

Mahabharat mentions path and places means it's our history.

[@sandeepkhan_al171]

Please anyone invite Ami Gantara in Nepal !!! 🇳🇵🇳🇵🇳🇵 Please how could it be possible???:"

[@Unknown00108]

We are so glad that you invited Ami ganatra ji namaskar 🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Thank you so much 🙏🏾🤗

[@snehad3260]

Thank you soooooo much for doing the podcast with her🥰 Amazing

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Our pleasure!

[@shitanshusabharwal7433]

Very informative

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Glad you liked it

[@swatim7001]

Actually in kach devyani katha, Kyunki devyani ko kach se prem tha, she insisted on shukracharya ki kach ko jivit karo. Par shukracharya kehte hai ki striyo ko mantra nahi diye jate par beti ke hatt ke age wo man jate hai. Devyani ko vidya sikhate hai. Shukracharya kach ko jivit karte hai then devyani shukracharya ko jivit karti hai. Then wo kach se apne man ki bat bolti hai, but kach says ki tum mere guru ki putri ho so is nate tum meri guru bhagini hui to hamara sambandh nahi ban sakta. Then devyani course kach that he will forget all this vidya.. ( Sandarbh - Shri Gurucharitra ) Edit - I'm not talking anything against Ami ma'am. She's the best. I learnt so many truth from her

[@tehsildarsalessirsa3804]

Kalyug ke jyadatar logo ka character Karn se milta julta h, or hume yhi sach accept karna hoga ki Hum Karn jaise hi, ghamandi, jealous, h or hume y saare avgun 6odne hi honge.

[@MS-ov9sv]

Excellent knowledge by Ami ji as always.....ppl who are looking for truth and facts will benefit ❤❤❤❤

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Thanks a lot

[@PSVEstates]

Ami ji has done great job .given us right info.about Karn,rakshas and so on from Ved vyas ji. We pray for you long & happy life. Thanks for your contribution to the society.

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

🙏🏾🙏🏾🤗

[@BapuPote007]

thank you for inviting her ❤

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Our pleasure!

[@vayuice]

Long live AMI ji.

[@prachujryabaruah3257]

Ami ganatra mam❤

[@kalyanroy8712]

Mahabharata is still relevant in today's time

[@AnjuSingh-ov2qr]

Please make a video on the book the beautiful tree by historian Dharampal ji it's about indigenous Indian education system and dalit and women education system and because of casteism Hindu's are not United please 😢

[@Sarah-nl3dn]

I wish our History classes were as interesting as your podcasts and our teacher as knowledgeable as Ami Ji. These leftists made history so boring and just glorified the mughals. It was all about learning dates and events. No life lessons, no practical knowledge. I don’t remember a single thing from my school history classes. But everything Ami Ji said here…I’ll remember till my last breath. This is the sign of a good teacher.

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Thank you so much 🙏🏾😍🤗

[@abhijeetkulkarni4249]

Bhishma also refused karna to participate in war..both things happened..karna also refused it afterwards in anger ...when duryodhana firstly went to bhishma to request him to become general he said that you decide wheather you want to go with me or karna....ref-Bori ce Bhishma-Abhishechana Parva Chapter 816(153)...afterwards when bhishma called karna ardhrathi he also refused in anger...she perfectly said that there was inconsistency in karna's decision making...but some of the situations also forced him to so...in shanti parva narad muni also said that it was divine power and destiny who forced karna to do that...i am not a fan of karna..but we can't judge the decisions of any character right now..because its the one who knows the pain of dealing with it at that time...and karna knew he was wrong and he apologised to krishna for whatever he did and he said i knew we are going to get killed..but no one can change the destiny...and thats the real truth...everyone knows what is right or wrong but its divine power and destiny which forces us to do what we might not want to do...

[@saurabhsingh2806]

Amazing session and thank you 🚩🚩🚩🙏🙏🙏🕉️🕉️

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

You are so welcome

[@AnimeStrixSix]

ved vyas rachit mahabharat and valmiki rachit ramayan shows and seriels se bohot alag hai and mere hisab se bohot logo ne inke alternate versions banaye hai and anuvad mai kuchh cheeje badli hai shayad un logo ne us time ke logo ko hope dene ke liye kiya ho par logo ne usko hi manna aur kisika na sunna logo ki problem hai + log reels banake misguide karte hai

[@12ruparam]

Actually devyani cursed kacha that he will no able use his vidhya anymore but can teach another person.

[@toy0008]

rat ko sote time dekhunga pura 🤡

[@FRANK_J_UNDERWOOD]

Same.😂🚩

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Pakka na?

[@Saimelodies2512]

@@AnvikshikiWithSatvik very happy to see sanatanis like you! Much needed of the hours to defend fake information providers like dhruv raathee!!

[@nrao8977]

Ami is a Rishini in her own way. No Moksh for her until she takes 10 more lives and spreads Sanatan. :) JK.

[@abhishekayushya1901]

Knowledge is itself a moksh

[@nrao8977]

@abhishekayushya1901 ग्यान is moksha, not "knowledge". ग्यान deals with that which never changes. In a way सनातन (that which never starts or ends).

[@sukladas4066]

Hum gao ke aged log english me kaise paade....ap hindi me Kyu nehi likhte...hum parna chahte hai ...lekin par nehi pate

[@vishalpawar9180]

Hindi mei hai, bhai

[@subarnadutta5294]

Hindi mein bhi hai

[@vayuice]

We need to upgrade with time . Not to give death penalty to brahmin was a 5000 year old policy. 1000 year back when brahmin Raghav was punished and get kicked by rana ratan rawal and raghav took revenge by provoking beauty of Queen Padmavati. Raghav should got death penalty . We have a tradition to stop battle at the time of sunset but 1000 year back Prithvi Raj army was attacked by Ghori army after sunset and thus PRC lost 2nd battle. We need to upgrade our self like we do with our apps from play store.

[@muditagrawal9400]

Bhai sound improve Karo concentration ni ho raha

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Yes.. Will improve

[@SATYASANATAN59]

Please invite j Sai deepak and Vikram sampath

[@creativeshorts7681]

Castism khangress ka ek bakwas hai isliye maine khangress ko 14 saal pehle vote dalna chod diya.... boycott khangress

[@arvind197]

In one of her podcasts she said - Ram ji used to eat non-veg.😢 If this is the level of her research, I simply cannot trust her research.

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

What proof do you have that they didn't?

[@HiddenHistoryofBharat]

​@@AnvikshikiWithSatvikWe get a hint of it that they didn't ate non veg from Ramayan's that portion when Bhagwan Ram is asking Vibhishan that as he is an Asura, his Mayavi shakti can help them cross the ocean. To which Vibhishan replied that all the Mayavi Vidya with him are Tamsik in nature so you (Ram) will never do that, to this Bhagwan Ram agreed.

[@stranger8893]

Well it is the fault of translation If u research then u will get what the reason she told so

[@bhavnabhavsar409]

JAY SHRI RAM BETA 🙏 🙏 🙏 EK MA APNI KUNDLI SE KAISE DEKHE KI USKO BAHU KAISE MILAGI JARUR BATANE KI KRIPA KARNA AABHAR BETA 🙏 🙏 🙏

[@tarunajay]

Can we have captions in English too?

[@kaminibhadoriya8946]

Ye tv wali mahabharat me ni dikhaya

[@defenceaspirants44444]

🙏Mahanayak Arjuna my inspiration 🙏

[@AnimeStrixSix]

kach and devyani ki kahani aayi thi sanskrit subject mai aur asur ne bohot bar kach ko mara and aapke podcast mai jo bola ki kach ko khila diya vo yad hai bad mai usko devyani shrap deti hai and vo chala jata hai

[@heavenspleasure793]

Bhism ka itna practical knowledge tha to ved padne walo ko maar diya😢

[@Unknown00108]

Please invite veducation ( prateek prajapati )

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Already done 3 episodes with him

[@Unknown00108]

​@@AnvikshikiWithSatvik sorry i didn't check thank you so much 🙏🙏🙏

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

@@Unknown00108 no problem 🤗🙏🏽

[@TheWanderingPrince]

12:24 Baano ki shayya not shalya😂.

[@yashkapoor9299]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@archanapandey7247]

क्या ये वेद हिंदी में लिखे गए है?

[@toy0008]

full podcast on caste system pls

[@apnawalagame7051]

❤❤

[@Apurv-xl5ss]

Jab Bhishm apne pratigya ka Palan karte hai woh great. But karna pratigya ka palan karte hai tab woh apne prestige ke bare me soch raha hai. Bhim ko bhi ahankar tha apne shakti ka. Bhishm ne bhi gandhari ke family ko bandi banaya tha. Sab kuch na kuch had tak Bure the. Lekin sabse jyada Bura karna ko bana diya. Apne convenience ke hisab se. Waaaaa

[@SA-cb2it]

agar profession inherit karte the ancient times main toh phir toh tumne caste system confirm kardiya ye bol kar. jo baat chal rahi hai nai aur shephered ki, geeta main toh bola hai krishna ne ki jo apne temprament ke hisab se kaam nahi Karta hai vo adharm hai, jaise arjun is good at fighting and if he doesnt wehen it matters then it would be adharm, if someone inherited profession of nai but he is not good at it or doesn't want to do it then doing it will be adharn, aap kya sikha rahe ho??? pehele jo profession milta tha logo ko vo unke aptitude ke hisab se milta tha, cast system aaya hi aise ki inheritable kar do usko kisi king ne probably apne fayde ke liye again someone adharmi, but people may have different capabilities and it is wrong in any possible way and that is adharma.

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Very false equivalence

[@shyamalkumarsowmondal7704]

J

[@shubhamnegi4202]

Whatever she is saying ask her to give reference also

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Bhaisahab... Read her book... Stop blind defence

[@shubhamnegi4202]

@@AnvikshikiWithSatvik wow and who is she vedvyas? whatever she is written and interpreted is absolute true

[@shubhamnegi4202]

If you are so much interested in learning history then read books from authentic sources and people rather than just a single book from a random person and thought oo i know everything now

[@randomedit11000]

​@@shubhamnegi4202 for reference read Mahabharata critical education i.e. BORI CE which is made by reasearch of 40 years. So it is authentic.Pdf is available on Google for free.Also for Hindi Gita press version is there available on the Gita press website.

[@DrsaiKamalofficial]

She is a scholar who has deeply researched on both , Ramayana, Mahabharata and other references then she has translated from Sanskrit to English.She is sharing her interpretation in this discussion...on the basis of her perspective.if you haven't the basic mindset and mindfulness then you can't get the information shared.​@@shubhamnegi4202

[@pradeep000029]

Madam ji, jab senapati ko confidence nahi hai, wah sahi responsibklity nahi detay, apnz samay waste kar k kyun frustrate hotey....Bhism was sufficient to control Pandavas, to Duryodhan ko kya daar tha?? Karna k pichey madam haath dhokar pad gaye hai. Madam ji Ganpati G say original Vyas rachit Mahabharat lay aao

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

So tell me one thing... Every person that has read Mahabharat has things only to say against Karna.. Also why are you so pro karna?

[@pradeep000029]

@@AnvikshikiWithSatvik you comment is factually in correct, Karna is not villan in Mahabharat, he was infact Danveer...he conquered India defeating Bhagdutta whom even Arjun cannot defeat...Karna was equivalent to dron n bishmz being stident of parshuram. Arjun was son of Indra dev , went to swarglog, had war with aduras there, so has understanding to deal with Gandharvas....

[@tejasa8429]

​@@pradeep000029Karna was short tempered, foul mouthed, arrogant person. Learn Mahabharat by reading not by watching TV serial

[@ShouryaGoyal-g7m]

Why is she mispronouncing 'gyan' as 'nyan'?

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

She is saying dnyan... Which is another word for gyan & a correct word too

[@ShouryaGoyal-g7m]

@@AnvikshikiWithSatvik Noted

[@shreyassharma9267]

There is no such thing as Ved Vyas written Mahabharat in today’s world. These are just the manuscripts written by ancient people. I don’t know how she was able to read the original as there is no original Mahabharat available anywhere on the face of earth. Just some cheap stories to promote and sell her book. I’ve spoken with many dharma gurus and no one agrees with her bullshit. Just defaming Karna to get more publicity so that people will buy her book. P.S. - how did Karna get injured in Gandhar Yuddh? he had his Kavach and Kundal and there isn’t single mention of him running from the battlefield to save his life.

[@Frutiy4870]

yeah devi draupadi ko, arjun ko, yudhishter ko kuch bhi galat keh do lekin apne pyaare adharmi karn ko koi kuch na kahe, wah,🤡 and you trust your serials then a actual manuscript. mahabharat ki katha manuscripts se aai hai na ki koi tv serial se

[@60baayushpandey50]

She always said same thing about karna on every podcast nothing change . She never talk anything good about karna, only try to defaming him like he was worthless . I think she would be happy if KARNA name removed from mahabharat

[@Frutiy4870]

@@60baayushpandey50 to karn ka character jaisa hoga vo vaise hi bolega na, karn is too over glorified, I agree that he was a good warrior, but he was a adharmi

[@60baayushpandey50]

@@Frutiy4870Still many people admire him including me, and also I'm not andhbhakt I accept his some bad deeds but his good side is also appreciable. Great warrior he was no doubt.

[@Frutiy4870]

@@60baayushpandey50 yeah you are right

[@shankar16389]

Looks like ami is too much disisive on characteristics of karn. If karna is pointed out then I consider dratarastra was the legal hire for the Thorne and duryodhana to be a 👑. This is the truth of Mahabharata

[@AnvikshikiWithSatvik]

Everyone who has read the primary story has the same opinion & it's consistent without any dispute about karna

[@coolabhikumar1001]

You're wrong. Dratarastra was the caretaker king and was never coronated. Thus, his son was never the legal hire. The real king was supposed to be Pandu but he left his kingdom. Thus, when his 5 sons returned then the caretaker king should have declared yudhishthir as the crown prince who will become the future king. But we all know how that caretaker king got greedy and the rest is history.

[@user-il5pr2un8x]

You are just blind bhakt of adharmi karn that's why couldn't digest real facts but she is scholar ,

[@shankar16389]

Look my friend the beauty of Santana dharma gives freedom to interpretation. I have seen many podcast where we do advertise our characters like saying karn is wrong or to say ravana was rapist (but we do still use and Revere ravanas maha mrytunjaya mantra).They are all our ancestors and we can learn from and every one has there own divinity but the sides where they were might be questioned.what ever it is if dratarastra was not fit and is always blamed then why did not vidura became the king who was a righteous person.

[@shubhamnegi4202]

Its is just her perception on karna.not a absolute truth

[@tejasa8429]

Anyone who has read original Mahabharat knows what kind of short tempered, foul mouthed, arrogant person Karna was

[@shubhamnegi4202]

Read scriptures of hinduism from the authentic chain of gurus(like shankracharyas parampara) only then u can understand the meaning of each word