The current British government does not want the public understanding the extent of Russian influence in UK politics. I wonder why?
@tmarritt8 ай бұрын
Be fair I hated Boris but he was strong against Russia, if only so he could live out his fantasy of being Churchill
@zo70348 ай бұрын
No... he wasn't@@tmarritt
@matthewn18058 ай бұрын
@@tmarritt Not at all, remember he blocked investigations into Russian money going to the Tory party. What he did which I think has confused is he repeatedly went to Ukraine to give apparent support, but he went as that was an easy way to get in the press and be away from parliament during awkward questions.
@endintiers8 ай бұрын
Russian money to politicians (nobles at the time) destroyed the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Russia has been playing this game for centuries.
@boredofthisnow8 ай бұрын
@tmarritt strong? Maybe he had a strong forehand during one of the personal tennis matches he auctioned off to Russians.
@joestacey77938 ай бұрын
This one was great! Really informative and insightful. Thanks to both of you and to everyone that helps put these together
@davecap26418 ай бұрын
It is not possible to rely on MPs behaving in any ethical way and a legal code should be introduced with real penalties for those who break the code. Maybe then there will be some grounds for trusting our MPs.
@requiem17238 ай бұрын
We're allergic to saying 'corruption' about our ruling party. That's something that happens in *foreign* countries, says my strawman Middle Englander. We need to stop being afraid of accusing our government of corruption. There is the perception that our partially-elected representatives are looting the country and we're doing nothing meaningful about it. And even if someone is found guilty of wrongdoing, what happens to them? The absolute worst is that they lose their seat - more usually they lose their cushy appointment and/or have to wait six months until the PM changes. They should lose their shirt. As Alistair says, when Labour comes in there needs to be something that future historians will refer to as a bonfire.
@johngriffin97208 ай бұрын
A very deliberate, and very precise strike against British aid workers, why isn't HM Government trying to establish EXACTLY who is responsible, and then taking the appropriate judicial action?
@fredslipknot98 ай бұрын
Because this government supports Israel.
@janewhite23318 ай бұрын
Well the drone was supplied to the Israeli government by the UK.
@philipsmith19908 ай бұрын
How do you think HM Government will establish EXACTLY who is responsible? I suppose they could ask Netanyahu politely.
@W_Bin8 ай бұрын
How incredible that parliament has escaped being cleaned up for so long! Very valuable discussion thanks!
@GJAllKnowing8 ай бұрын
Like turkeys voting for Christmas 🦃
@kosty0028 ай бұрын
I love the way they can bounce between serious and fun. I was listening to an old episode on my walk today which really made me laugh out loud.
@fragglet8 ай бұрын
Problem with reforming the honours system like this is the same one that happened with the fixed term parliaments act where there's nothing to stop a future government getting around any reforms by just passing an act of parliament to to appoint peers. I'm of the opinion that, like other countries, the UK really needs a formal written constitution that lays out the ground rules and requires a supermajority to amend.
@johngriffin97208 ай бұрын
Gibraltar was captured by the British Fleet in 1704 during the war of the Spanish Succession. On 4th August 1704, an Anglo-Dutch fleet under the command of Admiral George Rooke took Gibraltar from the Spanish. From dawn on that day and for the next five hours, some 15,000 canons were fired from the fleet into the city. The invaders, led by the English majority, landed the same morning and not surprisingly encountered little opposition. Under the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713 Gibraltar was ceded to Britain. This treaty stated “the town, castle and fortifications were to be held and enjoyed for ever without any exception or impediment whatsoever.” This treaty was renewed again in 1763 by the Treaty of Paris, and in 1783 by the Treaty of Versailles.
@philipsmith19908 ай бұрын
It is a horrible coincidence that within days of the International Court of Justice ordering Israel to ensure that adequate food supplies are provided without delay to the population of Gaza the killing of workers in an aid convoy by the Israeli military has caused aid to be reduced by the withdrawal of some aid agencies.
@cassandra22498 ай бұрын
Is it a coincidence? The fact that the aid convey was targeted 3 times, with 3 different vehicles and was clearly marked, speaks differently I'm afraid.
@philipsmith19908 ай бұрын
@@cassandra2249 Perhaps my comment was too subtle.
@existentialvoid8 ай бұрын
the issue is that no one can guarantee that the food aid will not go to supporting Hamas - which is considered by the same institutions - as a terrorist organization. And supporting a recognized terrorist organization is also illegal. Like everything with this - its more complicated than it seems.
@philipsmith19908 ай бұрын
@@existentialvoid That is specious nonsense. Illegal to provide food and water to dying people in case they might pass it to a terrorist? Surely you can'not really believe that.. Israel, or at least Netanyahu and his cronies, have demonstrated comprehensively that they care nothing for the lives of Gazans. They have killed tens of thousands in the pretence that some of them might have been Hamas. Tens of thousands more have and will die from lack of aid deliberately withheld.
@cassandra22498 ай бұрын
@@philipsmith1990 Maybe it was. If you had started your sentence with "What a horrible coincidence"....I would have read the subtilty.
@johnvaleanbaily2468 ай бұрын
Too many ridiculous honours.
@mikedignum18688 ай бұрын
And they wonder why people are fed up with politicans and thinking of not voting.
@sammackinnon17448 ай бұрын
This is exactly the attitude they want to engender in the population. Once people disconnect from democracy it becomes easier and easier for a vocal minority to dictate policy. Vote. It makes a difference.
@thomasmclurg18498 ай бұрын
Why do we let the worst of us lead us...
@mufc1848 ай бұрын
Love Rory’s explanation’s very clear history in a few sentences 👍
@ernestthesmallholder5598 ай бұрын
Except that the Liberal Democrats did not exist in the 1920s.
@antonyliberopoulos9338 ай бұрын
Thank you for informing us in such an excellent way.
@DoriZuza8 ай бұрын
Anaesthesiologist here. Alastair, I’m glad your anaesthesia and surgery went well. You were probably safer than a Tory would have been 😅 Sorry Rory, you’re one of the good ones. In case anyone’s interested in the specifics: Every general anaesthetic does involve a (hopefully) short respiratory arrest at the start, and difficulties with the airway can be fatal, indeed. But the vast majority of patients survive just fine. Some patients get too worked up about the risks, others are so oblivious it’s a bit concerning.
@j3humps8 ай бұрын
Story about HK police with money in the draw. Retired PC told me a very similar one about his first day at the Met.
@sbwords8 ай бұрын
Yep, and the Met never cleaned up its act.
@daveyjohn10008 ай бұрын
It wasn't the Lib dems in the 1920's, wasn't it the Liberal party?
@col.hertford98558 ай бұрын
Well, there is a link from mergers and such, but your right, claiming equivalence between now and one hundred years ago is a bit odd considering the political system was different then. We were still and empire and a global power.
@paulshkurka8 ай бұрын
As a Social Democratic Party (SDP) member I can certainly confirm the Liberal Party became the LibDems in 1988, unfortunately.
@REG96AV6 ай бұрын
Probs for simplicity
@grantmcraven8 ай бұрын
As you discuss the difficulty of performing an inquiry in the tiny state of Gibraltor (pop. 32K) I'm reminded of the Pitcairn Island (pop. about 60) Sex Scandal of 2004. Six men were ultimately convicted, and the first couple of months of their prison sentences was to build a prison on the Island.
@t.p.mckenna8 ай бұрын
Can we very clear, MPs holding directorships and consultancies is as much a form of corruption as taking bungs. They are not being recruited to these positions because they have a pretty face. They're literally, on board, to open up their phone lists and make introductions. That has to stop.
@davesy69698 ай бұрын
OpenDemocracy has many articles about these friends of groups. The Conservative Friends of Israel group was the most active with 80% of tory MPs members. When Priti Patel was sacked for a series of meetings with senior Israeli government officials including Benjamin Netanyahu, they paid for the trip.
@michaels86388 ай бұрын
we don’t need to just stop cash for honours we need to strip the HoL from every member and hold local elections to ensure both houses are accountable to the public, these members should not be allowed to join a political party, true democracy
@JelMain8 ай бұрын
We need Direct Democracy, with a ratification of every bill by referendum rather than Royal Assent. Representative Democracy was rational in 1680, now we have fast telecommunications let the people sign the propositions into Law.
@machanrahan95918 ай бұрын
@@JelMain I don't think that would work, not with "newspapers" we have. Just look how the brexit référendum was conducted and the result.
@JelMain8 ай бұрын
@@machanrahan9591 Well, we've got to do something. Perhaps ban Newspapers from interfering in politics.
@machanrahan95918 ай бұрын
@@JelMain Do something ? Agreed. But I think I've heard that it's the people further to the edges who tend to vote. How do we motive the silent majority to become active? When I was at school in the 60s and 70s Political discussion was forbidden. After leaving school the young are then expected to make informed décisions. I've no idea what an answer could be, but you're right, something needs doing and urgently.
@dangroves59608 ай бұрын
Banning newspapers from interfering in politics? The purpose of newspapers is to report on current affairs and hold politicians to account, trying to prohibit newspapers 'interfering' in politic is absolutely ridiculous and completely authoritarian. @@JelMain
@requiem17238 ай бұрын
I was around for the days when 'sleaze' was the word most commonly associated with 'Tory'. It's happened again.
@nicholasarrow24438 ай бұрын
Long before they were the 'nasty party', they were the 'stupid party'. The 'sleazy party' too!
@davidmcivor27618 ай бұрын
Welcome to England, the most corrupt country on the European continent!.
@jonathonjubb66268 ай бұрын
Sometimes it doesn't take a lot to astonish young Rory.. Eg. 80% Brits think politics is corrupt doesn't surprise me one jot!
@gillianpope90398 ай бұрын
What's wrong with the other 20% ? Probably children!
@adambrickley11198 ай бұрын
Haha, yeah exactly. Eventually Rory is going to realise the conservatives are the bad guys too.
@Tom_murray898 ай бұрын
Another insightful podcast episode I feel you take the confusion out of politics
@Kevynuk8 ай бұрын
I am surprised that Boris Johnson did not give Stanley Johnson a hereditary peerage.
@williambrown59668 ай бұрын
Sadly. In the UK , there are too many MP's. Underpaid , hence totally medecore. The country is overmanaged by people with NO real life experience.
@tomcarr13588 ай бұрын
Every type of gambling from bingo to bookies via lotteries and raffles are being advertised on TV . Has this reached an unacceptable level of predation on many who cannot really afford it?
@playingdominoes8 ай бұрын
This is the priority. So many problems in our societies, but if we don't address the issue of politicians basically being for sale, then there is no way anything else will be addressed.
@normanchristie45248 ай бұрын
We've regressed to Rotten Boroughs.....
@marilynchivers47308 ай бұрын
Really interesting across a range of subjects. 🎉
@Schiltron8 ай бұрын
Anybody remember Bernie Ecclestone's 1million pounds donation to Labour and his sport's subsequent exemption from a tobacco sponsorship ban? It was all OK and above board because as Ally's boss explained, "I think I'm a pretty straight sort of guy". LOL
@haydoncooper37448 ай бұрын
Wired listening to a conversation about Corruption with half of this due.
@anneilsley71218 ай бұрын
'At least he could pretend '! You're so British Rory😂
@northoftheequator20948 ай бұрын
There is a performative element to Singapore's clean image, which these two gentlemen have bought into lock, stock and barrel. Read further on their complicity in the 1mdb scandal.
@Zifferony8 ай бұрын
Thank you for all the great interviews and discussions. Are you familiar with Vlad Vexler, political scientist with special insights in Russia? I think if you were to have a conversation with him on Russia, and the psychology of Putin and the people that surround him would make for a very interesting episode :)
@JelMain8 ай бұрын
I was close friends with Paul Judge, the Tory Treasurer who walked away over this: I built his Jury Team from folk like you on the Peston BBC Blog, not knowing he'd overdone it in our table-tennis games forty years before (he dropped dead, leaving his money from that time to set up Judge College at Cambridge).
@ruaraidhmorrison58798 ай бұрын
Even as a Labour voter, I would actually still be in favour of a HoL, or some form of upper House. However, it has been so badly abused for political gain that it has lost any credibility. Needs to be a system where the public has a say or there is some form of Independent committee. Prime Ministers dishing them out for friends makes an utter mockery of our country.
@SAHanson8 ай бұрын
Oh the pronunciätion of Utrecht here had me wincing so har!
@rickatatastan26958 ай бұрын
Inequality is the biggest issue. Everything else is distraction. The world needs redistribution - inequality has always been problematic, but now it threatens the security of supposedly wealthy nations. Did you see what Barbeque (a famous gang leader) said in Haiti? He blames oligarchs and corrupt politicians. The same problems we have.
@tolhumexy67068 ай бұрын
Amazing the amount of people who now 'regret' dealing with Friedman now they see they are not getting free money.
@W_Bin8 ай бұрын
30:00 inviting foreign mps to see situations is a legitimate educational tactic used by Ukraine! As long as it is transparent and no other favour/corruption involved.
@JelMain8 ай бұрын
You already have the experts, co-opted specialists on the Parliamentary Select Committees.
@williambaker71818 ай бұрын
Please put in chapter markers.
@carolinereidartist8 ай бұрын
Do what we Australians did- put up independent candidates, find them and vote for them. It will break the 2PP bulldust
@DuckDuckGo5128 ай бұрын
Its a joke. Whole thing needs abolished
@SA-tk9bj8 ай бұрын
Where is the wanting to working to help people...
@wayneburchell63468 ай бұрын
Can someone tell me how to get the Newsletter? Cheers
@alexm73108 ай бұрын
Excellent stuff ❤😊
@erikandersson142923 күн бұрын
Shocking
@MichaelClarke758 ай бұрын
Have I just entered some kind of parallel universe?? .....more commonly known as the Iraq Dossier.... or the Dodgy Dossier was a 2003 briefing document for the British prime minister Tony Blair's Labour Party government. It was issued to journalists on 3 February 2003 by Alastair Campbell, Blair's Director of Communications and Strategy.... He's now giving out advice on how to behave in public life???
@pmzjj58 ай бұрын
If an effective altruist isn't interested in poverty, what are they interested in? It was all a con imo.
@williambailie63138 ай бұрын
re. the discussion about reform of process for appointments to the Lords, I'd be interested in Rory and Alistair's thoughts on the process recently (2016) introduced in Canada for appointments to the Senate.
@pjs20thetube8 ай бұрын
I would propose that the UK elect the PM and key cabinet members either via Parliament or directly. The commons are elected on national wide on a party basis as opposed to constituency basis. Seats allocated proportional to parties. Lords reserved for functional constituencies e.g. people representing the military elected by service persons, business representatives elected by business communities, legal profession, representatives from each nation and regional representative. Lords conduct select committee meetings and regularly fact check political parties policies and bills. The judiciary selects judges as it but with endorsement from lords and commons. Judges must present their judicial philosophy. Local election on a constituency basis.
@janewhite23318 ай бұрын
Rory, you spend quite some time, laying out the disgraceful dealings between rich men and politicians which result in the men making huge donations and as a foregone conclusion given places in the Lords or given knighthoods in exchange. A very short time afterwards you then express surprise and dismay that apparently 80% of the British electorate think that this government of ours is corrupt. You’d barely finish telling us how corrupt they are!
@requiem17238 ай бұрын
Prospective MPs might say 'But I don't want to live like a monk for the duration' - sure! Nobody's forcing them to be an MP.
@suecole73388 ай бұрын
Wonder why I can't share this with others.
@existentialvoid8 ай бұрын
While I agree that shutting down independent media is concerning, Calling Al Jazeera 'independent media' is a stretch. The idea that US troops are going to escort anything into Gaza is bonkers. . . its basically asking for trouble. If anyone is going to do any escorting in Gaza - it has to be Egypt or Saudi. . .
@DylanSargesson8 ай бұрын
On political honours such as Kinghthoods etc, I don't really care - because ultimately being a Sir or having some letters at the end of your name doesn't matter (it gives you no income, no extra power) its just a bauble. Appointments to the House of Lords are of course different. I think there needs to be a political balance, since these things can have an actual effect on the laws that get passed. I do think there is a place for Peers who are former politicians. If the House of Lords is meant to be a House of Experts, having former Members of the (Shadow) Cabinet or Select Committee Chairs makes a lot of sense. Allowing former MPs to remain in active public life by being appointed to the HoL might also be helpful in dissuading them from going into the sort of Private sector corruption. It can be controversial, but I also think the power to get anybody into Ministerial Office by putting them in the House of Lords is a strength of the system. (But there should be limits on number and it shouldn't apply to Secretary of State level, like with Lord Cameron). So I wouldn't want to completely remove the ability of the Party Leaders to make nominations - but they definitely shouldn't have the final say.
@morant33678 ай бұрын
Not all parties partake in honours for cash. The 3rd largest doesn’t.
@danoneill87518 ай бұрын
I love the way Rory seems to instinctively know which thing I don't know all that much about. The explainer about the honors list - very handy! I have lived here for 40 years and yet still never really understood it all. I know there are lords and they sit in the second chamber and I know the odd snooker player gets made a knight for winning a lot, but beyond that, I really don't know. I always wondered whether you actually have to use the title, is it a crime to refer to cameron as just that, or do I actually have to say 'lord' like we were in 1840?
@sbwords8 ай бұрын
Blair and Campbell going half way around the world to kowtow to Murdoch was a deeply corrupt act. Funny how Campbell has a selective memory.
@Brokout8 ай бұрын
Effective altruism is just another form of trickle down economics
@trevordaviesable8 ай бұрын
Because the Americans caused Ukraine due to their declaration that they would not move one degré to the east, then they did.
@162528 ай бұрын
Not an insightful comment. Ttry Vladimir Solovyev for a more nuanced view.
@endintiers8 ай бұрын
It has reached the point where 'Sir' needs to be dropped from public discourse. Go on, be the new 'Little Monks'!
@DavidLowe-il5gy8 ай бұрын
Say something good about serious work done in House of Lords, in spite of the scandal of abusive appointments, by people such as John Tomlinson who has just died, his work as former MEP was also first class.
@interestingspagetti8 ай бұрын
America more so. But we are sending weapons to one side and aid to the other. Why not just send it all to Ukraine??
@mysteriousfox888 ай бұрын
singapore is such a den of sin and corruption that it should never be referred to in a unskeptical way
@janeknight35978 ай бұрын
Thank you for confirming the Pricy Council thing was “b…ks” Why has Mr Sunak shown himself unable to resist making himself a laughing stock ?
@stevenwilliamson62366 ай бұрын
Reagan did the same in Lebanon as far as I know.
@RobertThomson-y4m8 ай бұрын
Campbell talking about corruption, the irony.
@kayzlazerbeam0078 ай бұрын
I like how they talk about it, as if the Tories and Labour party are completely separate entities from their lives. Yet, (as they sorta allude to, without saying their own direct benefit) they both benefitted from the pay-to-peerage dynamic within their party's - party got funding, they and their MPs used that funding to get into some level of power. Funny how corruption is only an issue once they're not in it or benefitting from it. If only this thought process was with them when Rory was an MP or Campbell had that influence and power.
@iaindobson33878 ай бұрын
Do the suggestion in Ian Dunt's book and have a review every so many years of Peers where if they are not up to scratch they can be removed. If you are contributing then you can stay and if you are along for the ride, then you go.
@gailhill57348 ай бұрын
For a start the Lords should have no more voting 'seats' than there are MPs. Secondly they should be more proportionate to voting %. Nobody should be able to claim any allowance until they sign out after sitting for the day in debates. A panel should select worthy candidates based on proportionality from lists given by public and politicians. All parties should be publicly funded and made illegal for donors to give parties money
@atthebridge8 ай бұрын
RS says when it comes to honours all the parties do it. Not true. The SNP has never nominated anybody for a peerage or a knighthood. Nor is it represented in the House of Lords. You might not like them very much Rory, but you should credit them when it's due.
@BIBIWCICC8 ай бұрын
Gibraltar launders the South American cartels money and Malta does the Italian mafias, this all goes through the online gaming agencies and is signed of by the four big accounting firms.
@SylviaPhilpot-c3m8 ай бұрын
Depressing
@thewoodster86078 ай бұрын
How deliciously ironic: Alastair Campbell wants to change the type of politics that he created.
@CalledTurnAGundam8 ай бұрын
🎵Do you hear the people sing?🎶
@normanchristie45248 ай бұрын
Sunak and Easter/Oestre?!
@PaulGappyNorris8 ай бұрын
Given the amount of worldwide corruption ‘recognised’ in this podcast what hope have the electorate in any country that their government is ever going to do any good for them. The planet is farked…😐
@stevejones52368 ай бұрын
Let’s talk about “conflicts of interest” - if you use your position to give a direct advantage to your conflict of interest by means of manipulation, that should be outlawed. In the HoL to get the most knowledgable ppl in there I agree, conflicts of interest is inevitable… however, absolute detailed scrutiny needs to take place - and any sign of wrong doing should be heavily punished.
@firujmiah77817 ай бұрын
You wrong mate. We need indepedent parliamentians. PR IN VOTING SYSTEM. MORE PEOPLE DECIDE WHO THE LEADER IS SEPERATE TO MPS DETERMINE . FLAT RATE PAY FOR MPS. MAXIMUM TIME FOR LEADER 2 TERMS MAX.
@REG96AV6 ай бұрын
They do support voting reform but it wouldn't make it much less corrupt. They wish to rackle curruption
@lenabo99298 ай бұрын
rorry looking very youthful.
@clivemitchell32298 ай бұрын
IMO anyone who is a member of a political party has a somewhat biased view of life so should not be sitting in the second chamber - keep politics in the Commons. Instead, have the Royal Colleges and professional bodies elect representatives from their members who have, say, ten years of experience since professional qualification during which time they have not held party membership. The HOC can be elected by those who are most vulnerable to unworkable political ideology. The HOL would become a chamber populated by a wide variety of apolitical experts, selected by their expert peers.
@richardoldfield67148 ай бұрын
The House of Lords should be replaced by a 'House of All-Sorts' (with the same powers as the current Lords) to which a wide array of groupings can appoint (or internally elect, if they so choose) representatives. For example, the Girls Guides get X number of seats, ditto the Scouts, cricket clubs, schools, churches, professional associations, charities etc etc. Even life and hereditary peers could be allocated a few seats.
@canonbangpowell8 ай бұрын
Totally agree with Alastair, the honours system is dirty and absurd, and it is time to get rid of it. Infantile cod-medieval nonsense.
@billyo548 ай бұрын
@ 12:25. Recuse yourself?? How very American Rory. Don't you mean excuse yourself. This adoption of American terms is depressing. Thrown under a bus,double down etc. Oh dear. Nevermind, Love the podcast boys.
@mrlepus8 ай бұрын
Rory's had his teeth whitened.
@stephenwood21728 ай бұрын
Alistair: "Labour needs to *insert progressive policy that they definitely aren't going to do here*. It's sad because many people are going to vote Labour thinking that they might actually implement these policies, not understanding that they are subject to the very same corruption discussed in this podcast! Odd that Campbell can't see it given the outrageous PFI deals handed out to private companies by New Labour.
@charlesjackson26388 ай бұрын
05:15. Rory is a bit feeble and gives up too easily over cash for peerages. One approach would be to pass a law which reversed the burden of proof. So if Joe Bloggs donated money to a political party and was made a peer (before or after) that would automatically be considered a corrupt transaction. So Joe Bloggs and the PM would be considered guilty until proved innocent.
@kristianhn24798 ай бұрын
From one constitutional monarchy to another: Just get rid of the House of Lords (we did that in 1953) and change the voting system to the D'hondt method
@AlexPReal8 ай бұрын
The Gibraltar wealth is mainly due to industries which do not abide by EU Law, especially gaming.
@Andy-il7kf8 ай бұрын
Alistair seemed quite grumpy with Amol rajan
@damienprevot25998 ай бұрын
It puts grist to the mill! 😊
@imo17518 ай бұрын
I don't think these are the two best suited to giving advise to anyone. Dr David Kelly, remeber him Campbell, good days needed to bury bad news
@ladybird40158 ай бұрын
But, what do you do with 500k in cash? You do your weekly shopping for 50 years? I do not get it. If Banks were truly clean ( and I am not talking about being pains in the neck to send £ 500 to your little brother for his birthday), large amounts of cash would be useless. First step towards less corruption.
@davidagbanwu53958 ай бұрын
Trump and Biden didn’t have an election in 2016, it was Trump -Hilary but very great podcast. I enjoy your work greatly!
@kennethvenezia44008 ай бұрын
Resurrect Oliver Cromwell
@jonathanfell6888 ай бұрын
A military religious dictator. Daft comment.
@neiljarrett6750Ай бұрын
Does anyone care about honours other than thkse that have them? Indont think so.
@RobBCactive8 ай бұрын
Rory should check what his former "honourable friends" have been up to! The evasion of scrutiny has been shocking. On Gibraltar it was indeed captured first and then ceded in the treaty concluding the war of Spanish succession, so Rory was right and I wonder why people only mention the treaty. But on SBF he had a defence lawyer but surprised by taking the stand which lead to him performing poorly on cross examination, which probably gave Rory that impression.
@falloncj8 ай бұрын
Wasn't Britain granted Gibraltar in return for continued support of Catalonia in endeavours for independence - which they reneged on within a few years. Also, it's calling it a navy base is a little generous since its primary function was for controlling the export of slaves to America... I'm always shocked that Gibraltar wasn't handed back with an apology/acknowledgement of prior failings like the rest of Africa, Hong Kong, parts of the Caribbean etc.
@RobBCactive8 ай бұрын
@@falloncj Are you a victim of deliberate disinformation or just error? 1) Catalonia, was "evacuated" but : Under Article XIII and, despite the British demands to preserve Catalan constitutions and rights in return for Catalonia's support for the Allies during the war, Spain only agreed to grant an amnesty, thus implying the imposition of the laws and institutions of Castile to the Principality of Catalonia, as it already happened in 1707 to the other occupied kingdoms of the Crown of Aragon. 2) the British government emerged from the treaty with the Asiento de Negros, which referred to the monopoly contract granted by the Spanish government to other European nations to supply slaves to Spain's colonies in the Americas. The Asiento de Negros had come about due to the fact that the Spanish Empire rarely engaged in the transatlantic slave trade itself, preferring to outsource this to foreign merchants. Bourbon France had previously held the Asiento de Negros, allowing French slave traders to supply 5,000 slaves to the Spanish Empire each year (slaves were bought from African merchants in W. Africa because the prevailing wind sped the crossing, while later the Royal Navy put a stop to slave trading as sentiment set against the practice) 3) Great Britain was the main beneficiary; Utrecht marked the point at which it became the primary European commercial power.[10] In Article X, Spain ceded the strategic ports of Gibraltar and Minorca. That was in perpetuity and as the Spanish had evacuated the peninsula, with an international mix of Maltese and sailors with nothing to do with the Spanish crown, your logic is based on poor assumptions. The new Spanish king also renounced any rights to France, as well as ceding Gibraltar, so one might say he gained Catalonia. Wars are very expensive for all involved, but peace demands compromises.