Decoupling Capacitors - And why they are important

[@SecularMentat]

This was a VERY clear and concise demonstration of why digital circuits absolutely need these caps.

[@Umski]

I am an EE by education and although I have used decoupling capacitors as a matter of course when I do occasionally get to do some hands-on stuff, this visual demonstration does a far better job than any explanation I was ever given 👍 I had also played around with notch filters in the past so adding that extra layer of detail as to how capacitance versus frequency can be managed would be a useful follow up 😊

[@kevingallineauii9353]

If he added a second electrolytic capacitor in the opposite polarity to the one he put next to the 555 timer would that affect the square wave at all?

[@PunakiviAddikti]

​@@kevingallineauii9353 Electrolytic capacitors have a polarity. If you install them the wrong way, they go POP.

[@donepearce]

And the last part illustrated why you never use the probe earth lead when measuring supply noise. Always the spring clip. Earth inductance is a killer.

[@LtKeyser]

Now it can be clearer than that. Even the plant standing on the shelf behind me got it. Well done.

[@TastyBusiness]

You know, until I had seen your demonstration, I didn't realize just how much decoupling caps were doing in circuit. I feel enlightened!

[@Binxalot]

me either, I knew they were important because I've always been told so, but seeing just how well they work was really interesting.

[@paulromsky9527]

Good video. To explain decoupling for high speed devices with lots of simultaneous switching noise (like FPGAs), inductance plays a big part. Notice: AC takes the path of least inductance, so at very high noise frequencies, any small inductance between the capacitors and noise generating device can render the capacitors less effective or useless. Even the ground/power planes have some inductance and the leads on the device and capacitors have even a bit more inductance. On a breadboard, it is difficult to keep the leads short and close to the device. Even a millimeter of lead length can add enough inductance so Very High Frequency (VHF) components of the noise are not decoupled. This is why Surface Mount Technology (SMT) capacitors and devices are now used rather than through-hole components, even the length of the trace through the holes and vias add inductance. This is why decoupling capacitors are placed directly under components right next to power pins with many redundant vias to reduce the inductance. Also, capacitors with a low Effective Series Resistance (ESR) have lower internal inductance and thus can decouple a wider bandwidth of noise. At this point each group of capacitors and power pin is a tiny localized Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Resistor Capacitor Inductor (RCL) circuit - the symbol L is used for inductance. Dr. Howard Johnson has awesome seminars on this. At today's billions of transitors switching at many GHz rates, these tiny dimensions become critical and you can't even look at a millimeter of Copper clad from a DC perspective anymore, you have to consider the high frequency AC aspects more and more - it becomes all very mechanically sensitive at this point. This is why it is common to have 3 decoupling capacitors for every power pin. A 0.01uf, a 0.1uf, and a 1uf, all SMT devices, all very close to the power pins with the smaller values closest to the power pins. This gives a wide band of decoupling from UHF down to Medium Frequencies (MF). For circuits that consume a lot of power and have Low Frequecy (LF) and Very Low Frequency (VLF) noise down to DC, larger 10uf to 100uf capacitors are required all over the board but these can be a bit further from the power pins due to inductance has less effect on lower frequencies as you approach DC. This creates islands of "hold up voltage" or "power reservoirs" all over the board - with the inductance between the circuits keeping the islands isolated at UHF even though there is a large DC path between them. In your example, even though it was a breadboard and you were using leaded components (as an example), you put the larger capacitor close to the 555 Timer. In your case it didn't really matter on a breadboard. People need to remember this video was a good demo, but you need to get into the habit of placing the smaller capacitor values closest to the power pins, with virtally no leads and no wires (mounted on the power/ground planes directly with SMT devices with low ESR and lots of Vias). That jumper wire you made from the Regulator to the 555 Timer has a lot of relative inductance, so as the 555 Timer output switches, the change in current (AC) that is supplying the Timer from the Regulator is partially blocked by that inductance and thus the circuits inside the Timer don't have enough local power reserves to recover properly. Remember: Capacitors block DC and pass AC, while Inductors pass DC and block AC. Even a tiny piece of of wire/lead/via/through-hole has significant inductance at UHF, and even DC planes have some inductance.

[@perniciouspete4986]

What he said.

[@JeffGeerling]

@@perniciouspete4986haha same

[@paulromsky9527]

@@perniciouspete4986 I gave him a like. I just rewatched the video. He really didn't get into what I said above. He mentioned low impedance decoupling, but never mentioned that stray/intrinsic inductance is what causes insufficient decoupling in high speed digital electronics. The reason he didn't get the noise attenuation he was expecting was because of what I mentioned above. I was not putting him down, I was just making the point that breadboarding is a way to demonstrate decoupling, but in a final circuit it would behove oneself to consider my advice. I do this every day, and in some cases I have to model the decoupling in simulation before a slap down 8 Xilinx Vitex 7 FPGAs on a board - thats many millions of transistors switching simultaneously at 200 MHz - a LOT a wideband noise that needs to be resolved. That's a lot of heat too... you can fry and egg on them... we actually did this in the lab.

[@paulromsky9527]

@@JeffGeerling It appears that you think I was just reiterating the video (correct?)... I beg to differ. I think I am going to make a video that explains the finer points of decoupling, it is actually "high science" these days, not like in the 70's where you put a 0.1 uf ceramic disc capacitor next to each microcircuit. See my comment to Pernicious Pete. Peace.

[@eternaldoorman5228]

This comment should be a chapter in a textbook!

[@jibeji]

The best demonstration ever! Simple components, simple explanations to litteraly see the truth. This video is a must-see for all electronincs enthusiasts.

[@TheB787heavy]

Gotta love KZbin. Interesting how this kind of valuable information is left out of electronics classes! Godforbid they tell us the why and how engineers decide to use certain electronic components in their circuit design. Keep up the great work!

[@Ozzymand]

This is amazing, what my teacher tried to teach us in 1 semester, you've explained in 1 video, sure there are a lot of tiny details missing but the big picture is here

[@thephantompsychic]

Very well done! A lot of great info that appears to be backed up very well by data acquired and shown in the vid.

[@agw5425]

I have often wondered what the point of a decoupling capacitor was, now I have a much better idea, thank you.

[@Brandon-qp7gq]

this was so helpful for understanding noise filtering. Seeing it on the oscilloscope makes it much more intuitive! Time to add some capacitors to my projects. Thank you for making this!

[@scottgarland1781]

One of the best electronics videos I have watched in the past 10 years. You have a very special skill of demystifying complex concepts. I can't wait for your next video. Well done!!!!!!!!!

[@0dbm]

Of all the videos out there , your style of explanation is the BEST , Thank you

[@got2rock4]

By far the best explaination and example ive seen yet and great visualization. I build guitar pedals and always knew the input and output capabilitors filtered noise but this the best visualization ive seen of it actually working to clean the signal.

[@PebblesChan]

All the decoupling capacitors do is to compensate for your PDN’s (power delivery network) inductance. They essentially act as Columb buckets of charge to handle local power demand. The noise you see at the 7805 regulator’s input is generated by your bench’s switching power supply along with the long connection leads. If you improve your PDN ‘s design & layout you may find that the decoupling capacitors aren’t needed at all. The measurement of power supply noise is also greatly affected by probing technique. It is best to have the probe’s signal and signal return’s (i.e.) as close together & as short as possible as not to introduce unwanted impedance mismatch which’ll create false noise readings.

[@MrCarlsonsLab]

Nicely explained! Single point grounding or (star grounding) also helps "a lot." Have a good day!

[@d614gakadoug9]

Single point grounding in digital circuitry is virtually impossible. It can be very helpful in moderate bandwidth analog circuitry. Careful attention to local current paths is still worthwhile. (I've done a lot of SMPS design - not the little ones - and current path management can be quite a challenge.)

[@abandonedcranium6592]

People are correct. This video makes it much easier to understand. Some concepts are easier for me to learn when I see them visually 👍 I like the funny outtakes at the very end!

[@GilmerJohn]

An old EE once told me that capacitors simply move "noise around. They don't eliminate it. You get rid of noise with capacitors AND resisters.

[@BubonicPestilence]

Finally, someone explained this simple way, thank you!

[@pieterpennings9371]

Thanks for this video! You just explain it all very clearly and get straight to the point without wasting my time.

[@Drü_W11823]

I watch @bigclive and I found this SUPER helpful and informative! Excellent demonstration in real time. Please do bootstrap circuits next?

[@robglassey4517]

It says right there in the datasheet for this LINEAR regulator, that a capacitor is required on the input for STABILITY. Without it, the regulating feedback amplifier inside the regulator becomes unstable. That is, any small variations in the INPUT voltage cause the feedback amplifier to unintentionally react, causing a change in output voltage and therefore load current that causes the the input voltage to change even more due to the source impedance (lead inductance). This is positive feedback, and it causes the oscillation that you see. This is NOT noise, it is instability. Adding the input capacitor makes the input voltage much less sensitive to rapid changes in load current, enough that any unintentional reaction by the regulator does not change the current enough to make things worse. It's all about how fast the input voltage changes in response to changes in output voltage and corresponding load current. Too fast and the regulator's negative feedback can't compensate for the positive feedback cause by the amplifiers response to fast input voltage changes. The instability gets worse, as you have shown, when the load is greater, since the current changes more with the output voltage, thus effecting the input voltage more. The datasheet notes that the input capacitor is only required if the regulator is far from the filter capacitors of the supply, as they would do the same job, but with long leads, the inductance of these leads is too much and the input voltage becomes more sensitive to the current changes.

[@michaell8269]

Yea, when he started talking about switching noise from the regulator, I was like err, that doesn’t sound right.

[@luminousfractal420]

so i do need to keep my crossover leads short or shielded 🤔 ty

[@Dave_en]

Clearly showed what decoupling capacitor exactly does. In our engineering classes our professor just said to use decoupling capacitor at input and output of the regulator but didnt explain on the board or in lab how it affects the output. Thanks for the explanation. It has been nearly 20 years I learnt about voltage regulators but now i know the exact purpose of decoupling capacitors. Earlier i used to add decoupling capacitor as an electronic ritual.😂😂😂

[@sstijn577]

Excellent video sir, nice simple hands on explanation and nice and easy to understand, personally I just recently discovered PCB design and I fell in love, something I've seen tested as well is people not using bypass capacitors, when I first saw this I was so confused until I realized they use the Power and GND plane in the stackup with a thinner layer of FR4 or whatever material as a dielectric, that was so interesting to me, but it is as you said, depends on the application and a PCB isnt a breadboard, way better for current loops etc.. thanks for the explanation, it was really well made, 😁

[@tuahsakato17]

Damn, this is amazing.....i learn a whole lot in 7 and a half min, thank you soo much mister

[@wueltschey]

“Low impedance path to ground for the high frequency component”…. Thank you! That makes a lot more sense. Does this mean that the capacitor is effectively a low pass filter?

[@JR-rk5dr]

this was the best explination i have seen on the topic

[@brandonfurtado380]

This is so cool...the video is very well explained....it isn't even taught in university so well ... please continue to make more videos like these...thanks

[@3DSage]

This information is very helpful to me! :)

[@SurvivalSquirrel]

Having 3.840 Subscribers with only 3 videos is quite an achievement! But it shows the quality of your videos. If it could be scaled up, you will have almost 40.000 subscribers with 30 videos ;-) Please make more videos!

[@rpbale]

This is a great video. Please make more of these. Love to know more about PCB design techniques to deal with noise.

[@AutomaticGamess]

Great video! I am going for a degree in EE and would love to see more of these types of videos! Suggestion: next try the wheat stone bridge! Maybe we can do some content together

[@PankajGupta-hr8iq]

Great video, I guarantee this channal will blow if you put videos of such quality ..

[@leehomeschooling4644]

Good teaching , I hope my university teachers can explain this clear as you do

[@Spencer_Sp]

Spoiler: they cant

[@Dime_Bar]

Very informative thanks, especially showing the effects of the capacitors on the scope 👍

[@sergioduran3410]

Amazing video!I hope to see more in the future!

[@Sctronic209]

Your explanations are very clear.

[@daniellehwing4667]

Very nice class! This is way better than the classes I used to have back in the day. Got a new sub! Cheers!

[@jenaltok]

Amazing videos about decoupling capasitor

[@GoutamDAS-ls1wb]

Excellent video presentation! I saw proof of effectiveness right away! Can you please explain in another video why manufacturers use a combination of electrolytic and ceramic capacitors instead of just one kind. Is it because the former provides better smoothing while the ceramic is more effective at shorting higher frequencies to the ground?

[@davidwhite9751]

I enjoyed the video. I was hoping there would be a comment on the selection of the type of capacitor to be used. E.g. ceramic rather than mylar.

[@robertneill3057]

On the whole great presentation. Would have added a 100nF capacitor to the regulator output and increased the 1uF capacitor to 10uF for the 555 astable circuit. For standalone applications the 555 datasheet recommends a 100uF capacitor particularly in monostable circuits. The control voltage input also recommends decoupling by a polyester capacitor of at least 10nF. Have seen 100nF used/recommended. Tom Duncan's Adventures with Micro/Digital Electronics used the lower 10nF decoupling capacitor value on the control voltage pins of the dual 556 timer.

[@uninstalledsoftwares6266]

Your explanation is so simple. Loved it and subscribed

[@D1ne-O-SAur]

Man, that was hella good, you have an awesome way to transmit knowledge!

[@borsi99]

Thank you very much for this absolute interesting video! Very well explained👍🏼 I should have known this long ago. On my next selfmade PCBs I will take care of your informations! This is one of the best videos I have seen so far. Thanks a lot. Bo 🇨🇭

[@AnthonyFrancisJones]

Excellent! Many thanks for this - brilliantly explained!

[@DrSanaullahkhan98]

Excellent, very informative session ,Keep it up and all the best...

[@MUHAMMED_IRFAN_369]

❤❤ need more practical videos..

[@paprotkowa]

Just for the sheer quality, value and wit in this video you get an instant sub from me. Keep up the great work! Hope to see some RF content in the future!

[@Patyx42]

Fantastic video, subscribed! That's a great way to show the effects in practice on a common circuit that we can all replicate ourselves

[@rahuls7039]

This is such a well-explained video. Great Work! Keep it up.

[@martinmcfadyen]

Great explanation and presentation

[@Disruptedgarage]

This was excellent. Please produce more videos.

[@sej84]

excellent video! Thank you for the demo and showing us the capa effects in live

[@d614gakadoug9]

A demo I used to use: Build a 555 astable that operates at some moderate frequency like 2 kHz (not critical). Use a bipolar version of the 555, not a CMOS type. Use a linear 5 V power supply or a battery such as a single lithium cell or 3 or 4 alkaline cells. Connect the power supply to the circuit under test with two separate pieces of wire about 3/4 metres long. Connect the oscilloscope ground lead as close as possible to the 555 ground and the probe tip close to the 555 supply pin. Observe the voltage spikes. Disconnect the power wires and twist them together along their full length, only leaving enough untwisted at the ends to make connections. Reconnect to same points as before. Observe the voltage spikes. Add decoupling at the 555 and observe the voltage spikes. Explain what's happening. (hint: 555 output totem pole has high shoot-through current) The first test MIGHT kill the 555 with excessive voltage.

[@Electronzap]

Really good video. I learned a lot.

[@camgere]

Any transmission line has inductance per length and capacitance per length. Capacitors will also have some series inductance (and resistance which is very low) and form a resonant circuit. 2*Pi*F - (1/LC)^1/2. Switching circuits are full of harmonics out to infinity. If you just use one decoupling capacitor you are at risk of hitting the resonant frequency. Using several different values capacitors means that if one is resonant the other one won't be. .01uf and .1uf and 1uf. Decoupling capacitors are cheaper than warranty repairs.

[@legendelectrics4668]

Nice video❤, keep uploading

[@garypinholster1962]

Just getting into circuits, are you going to keep doing videos like this ex0kaining things like this? Itll be helpful for people like me

[@FWDSlip]

Mechanical engineer here trying to figure stuff out, thanks for the details.

[@SGThirkell]

Thank you for this. I always wondered what they did

[@adrianoribeiro2907]

Very good, this was a good and simple explanation on this topic.

[@acestudioscouk-Ace-G0ACE]

Very nicely and clearly explained. It helped me a lot and I have now subscribed. Thank-you!👍👍😃😄

[@senseiralph1462]

thanks.. very helpful explanation of the topic..

[@peckelhaze6934]

A great explanation. I have subscribed.

[@insanelydigitalvids]

Very clear and well presented.

[@kukunishad]

Nice Video !! Looking forward to see how to remove EMI with circuits. What are effects of multiple value capacitors in parallel? which seems not recommended in some references. Thanks !!!

[@frnno967]

I'm not an EE but suspect that multiple caps in series would raise the impedance of shunting the high frequency noise to ground, ruining the benefits. Also might have resonance like a filter.

[@grokwhy]

The LM7805 is a linear regulator, not a switch mode regulator. Check the schematic in the datasheet.

[@deang5622]

He's right. It is linear regulator.

[@gordonm2821]

But you are here to learn about decoupling caps so all good

[@deang5622]

@@gordonm2821 And you think that when the video producer makes a fundamental error that they should not be corrected? Don't be silly.

[@gordonm2821]

@@deang5622 - The person made a simple slip of the tongue whilst explaining how decoupling capacitors are needed. If the video was about voltage regulators then yes a valid point. They obviously know what they are talking about and the video is so clear and concise. Comments above like 'check the datasheet' are childish.

[@deang5622]

@@gordonm2821 Was it a slip of the tongue or a fact they did not actually know that the 7805 regulator is a linear type? If a person has used the 7805 ( and I have) then you don't make the mistake of stating what type of regulator it is. As the other commentator in this thread has said, "check the schematic in the data sheet". So the video producer has not looked at the data sheet. Irrespective of all of that, it is important to correct mistakes made by video producers so that the watchers of the videos are not instilled with incorrect information. There is no justification for opposing corrections people make. If you oppose people making corrections then you are proactively supporting the idea that educators are permitted to make mistakes in the content they are teaching. I see it so often with electrical people, particularly with qualified electricians that have been poorly trained, and partly they are handicapped by their poor intelligence, their lack of maths and physics qualifications , that set about creating educational channels on KZbin but don't even understand the basics properly. Their goal is to educate trainee electricians and yet they don't even understand the fundamentals themselves. To give just one example, I have had to recently correct a qualified electrician that did not understand Ohms Law. And in the comments section there was a viewer that had taken as accurate the guy's comments. So there we have a confirmed example where the viewers are picking up and learning the incorrect content from a supposedly qualified electrician. It is fundamentally important to correct errors when they are made. We should not assume why the video producer made the error. The most important thing is to correct the error so that others do not learn it. You should not be supporting and accepting errors. And if people are making errors in their videos because they don't have the knowledge to understand what they are talking about, then they should not be trying to teach a subject which they do not have sufficient expertise in. Teachers should not be making mistakes. End of Debate

[@drfrancintosh]

Great and concise description. Thanks!

[@dymastro788]

Great video, looking forward to more videos from you. Great meme btw

[@aco7992]

Thank you for your clear explanations !

[@Jawst]

Amazing please do more videos like this

[@laidman2007]

This was a very good explanation. Thank you!

[@velcroman11]

Great video, clear and to the point. 👍👏👏

[@DRACOBUCIO]

Man... That was a very good video! Congratulations, and thank u to sharing! :D

[@princebanini]

I love this video. Its very informative.

[@zerodegrekelvin2]

I am electrical engineer, you explain very well with the demonstration, however one explanation you can add is how the capacitor does the actual filtering, I think you said it but it can be more clear, I understand you only have 7:38 to explain 8-)

[@ervivekchoubey]

Capacitive reactance is given by the equation X=1/2πfC . So higher the frequency, lower will be the impedance provided by the capacitor. That's why when capacitor is connected in parallel, it provides a low impedance path for high frequency signals like the spikes and unwanted ripples whereas low frequency or stable signals get high impedance from the parallel capacitor and continue moving to the output instead. That's why these are called filter capacitor as they work like a filter.

[@shashu1999]

Great video. Why does the data sheet recommend a ceramic and an electrolytic capacitor specifically? Why not just use 1 capacitor of a single type?

[@d614gakadoug9]

High frequency performance of electrolytic capacitors is generally significantly poorer than that of ceramic capacitors simply because of the physical construction. Ceramic capacitor high frequency performance is generally very good, but, at least historically, large-value ceramic caps have been physically large and quite expensive. Using a small ceramic in parallel with an electrolytic yields pretty good performance across a wide frequency range. You can now get ceramic capacitors of 10 µF or more at low cost and in small packages, at least as surface mount parts. I very strongly recommend against any of the Zxx or Yxx types. They are small and cheap, but many have extraordinarily large negative voltage coefficient of capacitance. A 10 V part operated at 5 V may have only half or less of its nominal capacitance. X7R or X5R much less awful. Sometimes with just a ceramic capacitor you can get into a situation where the capacitor resonates with the stray inductance in the circuit and you can actually make things worse, though this is relatively rare. Electrolytics at high frequency may look like a reasonably good capacitor in series with a resistance. That resistance can "spoil the Q" of the circuit and damp resonance. Solid tantalum caps are an alternative, better than aluminum electrolytics and not quite as good as ceramics at high frequencies. They are quite expensive these days. Tantalums are intolerant of overvoltage and tend to fail short-circuit.

[@Songfugel]

Great video! masterfully crafted

[@gordonpayne9735]

Very instructive. Thank you!

[@roystokes8435]

Great explanation!

[@Attic-Toy-Design]

Fantastic explanations!

[@terracross8600]

Great video

[@mixolydian2010]

Nice explanation. Cheers

[@mikemarcus214]

Excellent presentation! I'm in the process of building my own TTL Logic CPU... which I plan to move to PCB(s) after BB prototyping. Any thoughts on noise reduction with higher speed signals (2 to 20 mhz) would be greatly appreciated.

[@zoro.73]

(2 to 20 mhz) is way different from ( 2 to 20 MHz)

[@jeremycrochtiere6317]

Thanks for the much needed review.. Very informative

[@davidhawley1132]

I've started making my own breadboard adapter PCB for SMD modules and MCU ICs when not available commercially. Now I think I will include coupling capacitors on the adapters. I know that dev boards are available, but I like to recreate the functionality as part of my own designs, and i need to test it, which is why i use adapters.

[@DelmaRaySmithJr]

Stayed through the end, glad I did lol

[@xeropulse5745]

Great video! Thank you so much!

[@DeLaCruzer11]

Why did you used different capacitors? Mylar capacitor on the input, disc capacitors and electrolytic ones on the others? Ia there a general guidelines when to use certain capacitors?

[@roqnroll]

i like the videos and explanations, but that white baseboard where the components are placed is making it very hard for me to understand the wiring....

[@MaxwellGauss-zn9yx]

Had the same problem its only when i actually looked at the back of the board that i kinda understood how they are wired idk it just clicked and i never realised there were actually metal wores in the back

[@ohaya1]

What a fantastic video! Super helpful!

[@zyroxiot9417]

Thanks, great job. 👍🏼🇧🇷

[@arbjful]

Nice tutorial, thanks for posting. What oscilloscope are you using?

[@davedavidson4215]

Was just about to ask the same, Most likely - Micsig STO1000C/E

[@Scyth3934]

Amazing job! Very well explained. I subscribed!

[@simoncliffy]

Have a think about the dielectric performance of the capacitors - particularly in X7/X5R types under bias voltage, about the frequency response of electrolytic dielectric and then consider what and where this "noise" is, comes from and where it goes.

[@d614gakadoug9]

I made the mistake of buying a moderate quantity of SM ceramic caps with Yxx characteristics without properly reviewing the data, having looked quite carefully at data for these types long ago. The ceramics used in modern SM caps of these types have absolutely horrendous negative voltage coefficient of capacitance. I would no longer use anything "worse" than X7 or X5 types.

[@simoncliffy]

@@d614gakadoug9 Epcos suddenly changed the max voltage rating of some 1812 chip caps 5 or 10 years ago. It was like "wow, they've improved the part" but no. They'd just extended the voltage cap degradation graph from -50% to -80% capacitance :-)

[@alimunsharif6326]

wow, nice explanation.

[@Sploit]

Thank you, awesome video!

[@iqnill]

Thank you, good vid! I do have a question. I've been using some DC to DC converters from Meanwell and they specify a maximum value of all decoupling caps in the circuit. Why? What could happen if that overall capacitance is exceeded?

[@barnabywilde374]

for instance, at the 555 IC which is outputting a square wave frequency, a too large capacitor can deform that square output. An even larger capacitor will do its best to flatten any such frequencies and force them closer to DC. Now that's ONE example.

[@d614gakadoug9]

Because they are switched mode converters you can get into problems of loop stability (and occasionally start-up problems) if the capacitance on the output is excessive. Some switchers tolerate almost infinite capacitance, others are finicky. If you need better filtering you can likely use LC filtering (a "pi" C-L-C type, typically), but be careful. You can produce unwanted resonances that make things worse rather than better. Inductors with moderately high resistance can "spoil the Q" of the resonant circuit, though at the cost of slightly degraded DC regulation.

[@PnPModular]

Amazing video ❤