Deleted Scene 2 Body of lies DiCaprio

[@megC1983]

I cannot believe that this scene was deleted. It appears that it would have made an impact on the movie and really added to the ending. This at least allows us to understand Agent Ferris's choices a bit better, especially toward the end.

[@signlanguage7624]

The undertone of this scene is Hoffman is willing to risk his subordinates life for information so long as his subordinate is ok with it.

[@Ridlazz921]

this part should not have been deleted, a great scene :)

[@wesoyromek4737]

powerful scene, I wish it was in the movie

[@zarbon002002]

The thing about all the deleted scenes is that they were fantastic. However i loved the movie so much that I wonder how they fit in the plot. Without this scene that hani's rescue scene became more center stage. If Ferris had died then we would not have got that brilliant hospital scene or the dramatic last minute rescue. Anyways Cheers to everyone who liked this film.

[@junlee6663]

Like most people Ed Hoffman is his own worst enemy. With him it’s always a damn Greek tragedy. His Ls are are self-inflicted, self-fulfilling prophecies. If Ferris had kept his word and suicided when caught, it woulda just messed up Hanis well laid out plan. This is a recurrent theme throughout the film. For all his intelligence, arrogance, money and power, he can’t get outta his own way. Hani even explicitly states sumthin like this in one scene. When Hani disdainfully mentions Hoffman’s joie de vivre i was on da ground. Wonder if that’s a metaphor for Murica.

[@jackbrady9738]

🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌

[@Gear1rus]

well laid out roast haha thanks

[@jackbrady9738]

"that's mine" genius

[@xxToxicDuckxx]

damn intense scene that would have been cool if it was in the actual movie

[@jyotikadche1910]

💌🌿🌼u dnt know abt me.take care n comeback home.love u...ur home.. los angel..California..USA.🌼🌿

[@aum0aumgood]

36:30 (Asad) OH, THE REGRETS that [most] human beings will have to bear! [16] Never has an apostle come to them without their deriding him! -

[@reflection8578]

Why did they cut anything in this movie. Longer the better

[@زيدعلي-ص9ض]

ممكن ترجمة هذا المقطع اريد الترجمه 😢

[@テネット-n9d]

actually he could keep a gps in his mouth or even swallow it or inject it whattever

[@zarqmirza]

What part of the movie was this scene was taken out from?

[@Col.J.N.W.SinghKhandala]

Zarq Mirza I suppose it was after the part where Omar Sadiki gets killed and Ferris' deputy gets injured and is admitted to the hospital and Ferris calls Ed Hoffman that he has decided to go head on with the jihadis because he can't bear to play this game of hide and seek anymore and also criticizes Ed Hoffman over the phone that, while bureaucrats like him can only 'talk' about war, it is field agents like him who are feeling the real heat of the war being fought on the ground. In a way, he scoffs at Hoffman's disregard for innocent lives being lost all in the name of protecting the homeland and discreetly hints at such callousness being abominable. Therefore, I think this scene perfectly fits the bill when Hoffman arrives in Jordan and lets Ferris know firsthand that he too is equally invested if not more, in this war against terror. Showing him the vial of poison is in a way directly exhibiting that it doesn't matter where one sits in the office of intelligence but, once on the ground, they are all field agents - no more no less in that, they are all guided and governed by the same rules of war. It is interesting to therefore see that in a war, there isn't much difference between the good side and the bad side. It all depends on the circumstances and situations one finds oneself in. Maybe, this scene was edited on purpose because, you must have noticed that Ed Hoffman's character has been shown as a cocky and arrogant one from the beginning and even in the end before Ferris signs off from the US Intelligence Agency. I suppose they have cut this scene so as to not let the audience get confused about what kind of character was Ed Hoffman's after all. Sorry about that really long harangue of an explanation there. It is just that I am a hardcore war movie buff and I love to analyse movie dialogues and read in between the lines and explain it to people. Hope you can come back with your comments on my analysis.

[@zarbon002002]

Good way if putting it bro. I agree on some of ur points. I don't post much but this movie was so amazing that it forced my hand to join in. As good as mark strong was in this as Hani Crowe also held his own I think. He does not get enough credit I think. I've read David's other book agents of innocence which is based in the seventies and it's about Israel mossad and the PLO. There's a station cheif also called hoffman. U cannot read that book without imagining Crowe as hoffman.

[@Punisher3545]

@xxToxicDuckxx i didnt get it ???