I had quite a few very busy years at McDonnell Douglas and then Boeing. I worked on the development team for the 10 ft Composite fairing for Delta II then went right into Delta III developing composite structures for it, fairing, payload adapter and interstage, then right into Delta IV developing fairings and payload adapters. I worked 7 years where Saturday was a regular work day. I was at the 1st launch of Delta III and was heart broken over the failure. I was at the 1st launch of Delta IV and it was a much better day. Then we became ULA. When Vulcan development was announced I assumed I'd be part of that development, but all composite structure design was subcontracted out to RUAG. So I grabbed a nice severance package and retired at the young age of 61. I had an enjoyable career.
@msudawg19972 жыл бұрын
It's always interesting to me how this industry is really kind of small and it's easy for people's paths to cross in various ways. Although our paths never exactly crossed, there are similar twists and turns. I started working for Rocketdyne at Stennis in mid-97 as they were in the transition to being bought by Boeing from NAA. While I was primarily working SSME for SSP at the time, I did support Delta IV Common Booster Core testing at SSC. I left Rocketdyne for NASA in Sep 2001 and eventually left Stennis for MSFC in 2009. Nowadays I work structural test at MSFC and one of our customers is RUAG- for some of that Vulcan composite hardware you mentioned. BTW, they recently changed their name to Beyond Gravity. LOL.
@jeromethiel43232 жыл бұрын
You got to live the dream! Cherish that. A great many people live their lives and their contribution to society doesn't amount to much.
@mattcolver12 жыл бұрын
@@msudawg1997 Yep had an interesting career and now have a comfortable retirement. Travelled all over the world after i retired, before COVID hit. Even camped in Antarctica.
@msudawg19972 жыл бұрын
@@mattcolver1 that's awesome! I hope to be able to travel one day but I've got to put in at least 9 more years with NASA. And because I waited late in life for kids I've got at least prob 15-17 years before I can think about actual retirement.
@mattcolver12 жыл бұрын
@@msudawg1997 One of the benefits of going to ULA is that I was able to start drawing my Boeing pension at age 52 allowing a nice double dip for almost 10 years. We've been to all 7 continents. I've fallen in love with the southern hemisphere. Less human civilization and unique wildlife.
@kerbalengineeringsystems74152 жыл бұрын
Here's my thought process on Delta Nomenclature: Once a major piece of hardware flies on a Delta, it becomes "Delta hardware," thus making any future vehicles including it eligible for the Delta name. So once the Delta Cryogenic Upper Stage flew on Delta III (which was unquestionably a Delta rocket), it became part of the Delta family and can transfer the Delta name onto any rocket that flies it, thus making SLS Block I Delta V. Once the ICPS is retired for Block II, it's still a Delta family rocket, since by the same logic the SLS core stage has become Delta hardware, meaning that it can carry the Delta name to Block II. By this logic, then, SLS Block I is Delta V, and Block II is now Delta VI. This is flawless logic and I'll be taking no further questions at this time.
@brianchan82 жыл бұрын
Since sls is a delta now, we need to increase the srb count from 2 to 8
@kerbalengineeringsystems74152 жыл бұрын
@@brianchan8 I fully support this
@Condorito3802 жыл бұрын
The Delta of Thesius, if you will. I will not, myself.
@brianchan82 жыл бұрын
@@kerbalengineeringsystems7415 well why stop there, there where plans to give the SRBS 2 smaller boosters, thus increasing the amount of boosters and making it better
@kerbalengineeringsystems74152 жыл бұрын
@@brianchan8 Just do boosters all the way down
@cosmicinsane5162 жыл бұрын
Glad you mentioned that Delta II launch failure. That’s probably my favorite rocket explosion of all time for two reasons. First, it was seriously spectacular with the massive fireball and thousands of burning chunks of SRB falling all over the launch site. Second, the commentary on the launch had what was probably the best example of understatement in history “We have had an anomaly…”
@oldfrend2 жыл бұрын
she must've been trained in bullshit PR, like all her ingrained instincts told her to NOT CALL IT AN EXPLOSION or some shit.
@CrazyMrTim2 жыл бұрын
I was in school that day and it sounded like a bomb went off
@RWBHere2 жыл бұрын
@@CrazyMrTim It definitely bombed.
@CrazyMrTim2 жыл бұрын
@@RWBHere lol yep, I remember the shocked look on my teacher's face
@evanfinch49872 жыл бұрын
Didn't dude's pickup get melted when he was working in the LCC bunker; he claims he called his insurance and was like pop on the news for proof of covered loss.
@rosswarren4362 жыл бұрын
Love it! "Delta" lives on a little longer. Can't argue with 700 missions for the "family". Guess that's as close as the U.S. will come to all the "Vostok/Soyuz" variants of the R7. I love the Falcon 9, but for many of us, when we think "rocket", that blue-green Delta II will always come to mind. Just FYI: It took about 10 gallons of AkzoNobel's aerospace coating "Blue Fluid Resistant Primer" to cover a single Delta II. Between 1989 and 2018, 155 of the rockets flew. Outside the space program, "Delta Blue" is formally known as Federal Standard 25193. Considered a shade of cyan, it is comprised of 36.47 percent red, 55.69 percent green and 58.82 percent blue. Delta Blue has an approximate wavelength of 488.02 nanometers. Pantone, known for its color matching system, identifies "Delta Blue" as simply "5483-C." If you wanted to paint your rocket - or your room - Delta Blue then you could look for Dutch Boy's "Midnight Run," Sherwin-Williams' "Mountain Stream" (no. 7162) or Valspar Paint's "Ocean Voyage." If you wanted to order your next car in Delta Blue, Chrysler's closest match is "Neptune Green," General Motors' offers "Adriatic Turquoise" and at Ford it is just "Medium Turquoise." To the McDonnell Douglas, Boeing and United Launch Alliance teams that worked on Delta II for three decades though, it was and continues to be "Delta Blue."
@Gapsx1eGewehr2 жыл бұрын
Honestly, SpaceX's rockets will always pale in comparison to NASA's greats of the past. They just ooze the vibe of rocketry, while SpaceX's rockets look a bit... too clean.
@rosswarren4362 жыл бұрын
@@Gapsx1eGewehr I think the basic white of the Falcon 9 is due to having to reject as much heat as possible in the hot Florida sun, especially with their using "super cooled" LOX and RP-1 to increase their density and hence the performance of the rocket. But yeah, it lacks "character" without even a single roll pattern on it.
@thedabblingwarlock2 жыл бұрын
@@rosswarren436 Well, at least until the booster's been up a few times, then it has a bit of character. That said, I was born in 1989, but when I think rocket, I always think of the Saturn V with the black and white scheme and roll pattern on it. There's just something about that monster that speaks to me.
@motokid60082 жыл бұрын
With all the performance they were trying to squeeze out of this family of rockets im really surprised they kept the paint job.
@Gapsx1eGewehr2 жыл бұрын
@@rosswarren436 I didn't know about the heat rejection paint, actually It makes a lot of sense now that I think about it though!
@msudawg19972 жыл бұрын
16:40 minor correction: At the time Boeing was developing Delta IV, the RS-68 was being developed by Rocketdyne. Which itself was also owned by Boeing. When Boeing bought McDAC they also around the same time bought Rocketdyne from NAA. It wasn't until many years later that UTC, who owned P&W, bought Rocketdyne from Boeing and created Pratt&Whitney-Rocketdyne (they went by PWR). I remember all of this fairly well as I worked for Rocketdyne at Stennis from June 1997 until Sep 2001. When I hired in we were being called Boeing North American as they were working out the logistics of combining the companies. It was some time after I left Rocketdyne for NASA in Sep 2001 that P&W bought them. So to the point, you could say the RS-68 was a Boeing engine at the time they developed D-IV. As a side note, I supported the D-IV Common Booster Core testing at Stennis. My main job at the time was running SSME tests on A-2 test stand but I got to work LH2 fill of CBC during test. Those were fun days.
@msudawg19972 жыл бұрын
Per Wikipedia, P&W acquired Rocketdyne from Boeing in 2005
@j994502 жыл бұрын
I was going to say pretty much this, Boeing did own Pratt, but it was only for 5 years from 1929 to 1934
@msudawg19972 жыл бұрын
@@j99450 I did not realize that Boeing owed P&W way back then. Thanks for that info. I'll have to go read up on the history of P&W.
@ethansigh2 жыл бұрын
The Delta II holds a very special place in my heart since I'm lucky enough that my cubesats flew on that final launch with Icesat2 in 2018! Thanks for such an awesome and informative video Scott!
@ronjon7942 Жыл бұрын
Heyyy, tell us more about your sats! Pretty please!
@frankgulla23352 жыл бұрын
Scott, you are the man of the subtle irony. "SLS is a Delta" Fantastic. Thanks for this detailed history of a major launch vehicle.
@aninditabasak7694 Жыл бұрын
No it’s more of a Shuttle.
@deusexaethera2 жыл бұрын
It was an immensely stupid decision by NASA to not build a 5th version of the Delta rocket, named Delta V.
@kamipollna2256 ай бұрын
It only adds more Delta V lol
@dotydude2 жыл бұрын
My first job out of college (Parks College of Saint Louis University) was testing Delta II Second Stage bi-propellant valves with water at Aerojet. Once I mastered that task they let me hot-fire test the whole engine. It was very reliable and I never had a failure.
@matthewkubinec16202 жыл бұрын
Considering SLS to be part of the Delta family because of the second stage makes sense when you remember from the first video that Delta was originally the name for the upgraded Thor second stage. So really, the common factor of a Delta rocket is the second stage lineage, not the first stage.
@1224chrisng2 жыл бұрын
which also means that Delta lost heritage with the Delta 3, so Delta 4 was never a Delta to begin with, nevermind SLS Blk-1
@fork90012 жыл бұрын
Then how does OG Atlas become Atlas V? Centaur upper stage?
@simongeard48242 жыл бұрын
And let's be honest, the SLS architecture is a very close cousin to Delta IV. An upper stage that's a direct derivative of the Delta one, a hydrolox core which at one point was intended to use the same RS-68 engine (until they realised it would cook itself, and switched to the RS-25), supplemented with SRBs to get it off the ground due to the deficiencies of a hydrolox core.
@THEncrtrooper Жыл бұрын
@@fork9001 Core stage tank. iirc the Atlas III mainly changed the engines & the Atlas V extended it.
@stefanschneider36812 жыл бұрын
"Down from 10 to 6 PER YEAR!" I first thought I misunderstood, but then I remembered: There were times before SpaceX, Rocketlab etc ... Great video as always, thanks Scott!
@Diskpartitional2 жыл бұрын
Yes, 6 launches per year seems pretty insane these days. It's funny to think that we had that many launches in a day a few days ago (albeit spread out across launch vehicles).
@scdallav2 жыл бұрын
6 per year is fairly typical for ULA
@joyl78422 жыл бұрын
I love the Delta IV Heavy. It looks so awesome, plus it runs on hydrogen! Also, it just kicks butt that it lights itself on fire T-0. What a vehicle.
@denysvlasenko18652 жыл бұрын
"Looking awesome" is subjective. Running on hydrogen is stupid for the 1st stage.
@cube2fox2 жыл бұрын
By any chance, was the Falcon Heavy design -copied from- inspired by the Delta IV Heavy? I mean they both strap on what is basically two extra lower stages on the side. SpaceX even copied the "Heavy" designation! (Of course with the Falcon Heavy this design makes even more sense since the three booster stages all come back!)
@joyl78422 жыл бұрын
@@cube2fox It may look similar because it's basically 3 of the same boosters strapped together, but they are vastly different vehicles and don't even run on the same fuel. Plus, have you ever seen a Delta rocket land and get re-used?
@ExtroniusAttributes2 жыл бұрын
@@cube2fox: Before there was Delta IV Heavy there was Titan III, which is (I think) the first "3 x 10' cores" rocket to fly. Of course, the Titan's two outer cores were SRBs while the center was a (stretched, I think) Titan II that didn't start its engine till the SRBs dropped off. You can go back further: if you don't get caught up with the shape and size of tanks, you can argue that the first "parallel staged" rocket to fly, and the indirect ancestor of the Titan III, Delta Heavy and Falcon Heavy, is Korolev's good old "Semyorka" R-7. One core, four side boosters, all powered by the same engines... Back in 1986, Newsweek devoted an entire issue to what was wrong with the Shuttle program, and made a fascinating comment in passing: that, in an attempt to design a simple heavy-lift rocket, McDonnell-Douglas had proposed a rocket whose first stage was SEVEN Delta cores strapped together. I suspect it's actually the reporter misunderstanding one of the Delta II solid booster configurations, but it would be a hoot if it turned out to be a real proposal and somebody turned up some design drawings!
@Soacwiththaface9 ай бұрын
Was at the last night launch of The Beast!!! Wont make it to port Canaveral this time but I'll be watching from 60 miles north.
@simontanguay36192 жыл бұрын
Very bold move adding SLS to the Delta family. But it's a bold move I can approve.
@steffan100002 жыл бұрын
Would love to see a series like this on the history of all the different Atlas variants leading into its retirement.
@scottmanley2 жыл бұрын
I did a single video on Atlas a long time ago
@rkornilo2 жыл бұрын
Great video as always, Scott. And I thought it was a classy decision not to show the actual explosion of Challenger.
@MrFaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa2 жыл бұрын
Agreed. There are likely family members, co-workers, or friends of the astronauts in the audience. It's a small world.
@DroneDocs2 жыл бұрын
Super excited about the Delta V launch coming up this year Scott! 😉 Fly Safe
@rockysgarage9 ай бұрын
Thank you Scott!! Just adds another layer of love for the Delta 2/4 rocket.
@elmofeneken43642 жыл бұрын
Scott, what a detailed, highly researched, informative Part II of the Thor/Delta story. Thumbs up! Nobody could have done such a thorough job on this subject. You nailed it!
@minikawildflower2 жыл бұрын
This is such a great series - I've always been curious about what came before the Delta II, since you'd figure it was Delta I but it was really this long development of different models you've covered here. Thanks!
@msimpson542 жыл бұрын
Scott can you please do one of these on the Titan family at some point? Don’t really hear a lot about them often
@jonminer98912 жыл бұрын
Hey, Scott. It's just another Delta... Riiiight. Very nice program. Thanks for sharing! Stay healthy!
@petequintanilla42372 жыл бұрын
Watching this show for me is like playing golf. If I understand 20% of what Scott is saying, I’m happy. It’s a good day.
@louissivo96602 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the nice overview and history of this rocket.
@edgeeffect2 жыл бұрын
I was a huge fan of Delta before you made this series.... after watching, I'm an even bigger fan! Great series... thanks loads.
@GonkDroid09232 жыл бұрын
Oooh you should do the Titan Family of rockets (1959 -2005)
@connecticutaggie2 жыл бұрын
LOL - "SLS is just another version of Delta". Great punch line, and a nice way to end the series.
@charlesmiller14462 жыл бұрын
A masterful Delta history! Thanks Scott
@blackberrymw2 жыл бұрын
One of the best videos of the year so far. Keep it up.
@jonathandixon35442 жыл бұрын
What a great series. Thank you Scott!
@paulkinzer76612 жыл бұрын
So well presented! Pretty much a book's worth of knowledge in less than 22 minutes.
@etrain7572 жыл бұрын
I want to say that I love these rocket history videos! I hope you’ll do a titan history too
@joyl78422 жыл бұрын
0:50 yes people! That's a white fuel tank on the Space Shuttle (only on the first two launches). The orange one came afterward and is thanks to the findings that the white paint wasn't necessary for its purpose (ultra-violet protection) and leaving it off saved 272 kilograms.
@dillonbledsoe76802 жыл бұрын
Who asked?
@benbaselet20262 жыл бұрын
@@dillonbledsoe7680 Maybe someone did, but most probably said "oh that's an early launch" when seeing the white tank :)
@MrViki602 жыл бұрын
@@dillonbledsoe7680 your mom
@MonkeyJedi992 жыл бұрын
@@dillonbledsoe7680 Wow. Who peed in YOUR cornflakes this morning?
@ronjon7942 Жыл бұрын
I painted my shuttle model’s tank white; thought it looked better, but maybe that was an 80s thing. I like the naked look now.
@AsteroidWrangler2 жыл бұрын
I know I have a deep seated love of ugly rockets, because something about the Delta III makes me happy and always has.
@jaydonbooth40422 жыл бұрын
While reading press releases and stuff for upgraded boosters recently I saw a strange graphic from NASA of an SLS in Delta II teal, and wow that would've looked great, I don't think it was ever seriously considered but for whatever reason someone decided to make a little blue SLS for a info page and it's a great "could've been".
@RCAvhstape2 жыл бұрын
Those graphics are fun sometimes. There was a graphic for the now-abandoned Ares V rocket (which morphed into SLS) which showed it with black and white pattern similar to the Saturn V, obviously a ploy to drum up enthusiasm for the project by making it look related to the coolest launch vehicle ever flown.
@jaydonbooth40422 жыл бұрын
@@RCAvhstape Yeah I've seen those old animations and graphics of it looking like the Saturn V paint job. I would've preferred either alternative, black and white or delta blue, to what we got with the orange, I think the white painted space shuttles look so much better. But I get it, even unpainted SLS's payload cap is pretty disappointing as of now.
@ItsNova8162 ай бұрын
The Artemis Kit mod for Kerbal Space Program gives you the option of painting SLS in Delta blue ;)
@eaofdeath1872 жыл бұрын
I'm playing KSP with the RP-1 modset once again and I always find myself building a Delta and Titan clone, both are very adaptable.
@pixelkatten2 жыл бұрын
I had no idea that the Delta had a miniskirt! Thank you for showing us what was under it!
@Truck_Company_84 Жыл бұрын
I have always, and will always love Thor and the Delta I through III rockets. I miss the Delta II sooo much.
@williammodlin26212 жыл бұрын
Hey Scott, what an information rich series about this historic rocket. I can remember the Thor from my childhood, so it’s been great to see the full panoply of this rocket’s career. You probably have a book in this! Thanks for the hard work and deep digging.
@santiagorivero60742 жыл бұрын
A few years ago my neighbour found in his farm a delta ii solid Upper stage that reentered earth's atmosphere, the uss governent came and gave him medalls and invited him to the united states but he didn't accept the offer. He showed me the medalls and told me the story when i was younger, it inspired me to learn about rockets.
@santiagorivero60742 жыл бұрын
The Upper stage was launched in 2003 to Mars by NASA according to a news article,probably oportunity or spirit launch and it fell in Artigas,Uruguay in March 2011
@sukubann2 жыл бұрын
astonishing Thor / Delta history, thank you very much
@evgSyr2 жыл бұрын
These ballast jokes never get old.
@Stant1232 жыл бұрын
When Scott Manley says he was "unlucky enough to have his car break down while parked at the launch site." what he's really saying is he was trying to convince the base staff to let him stay for the next launch.
@matthewcox79852 жыл бұрын
Love the pun in the still at 0:09... Marvelous. 😁
@NikitaWolf17762 жыл бұрын
Make one of these for the Titan rockets next please? Either that or the Japanese rockets?
@ChemEDan2 жыл бұрын
Scott Manley: Explains a bunch of *incremental changes* made to a launch system. Me: So that's why they call it *delta.*
@ronjon7942 Жыл бұрын
Ahhh, nicely done.
@michaelterrones46427 ай бұрын
Worked General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, and ULA as a Quality Inspector. Total - 42 years. The Atlas missile outlived them all and is still going. The GOAT in aerospace!
@dianapennepacker6854Ай бұрын
I wonder if you worked with my grandpa. He worked in around Lockheed, and maybe Douglas, and the nuclear industry. I think as an inspector or saftey in both. He didn't talk about it much at all sadly. I do know he, and people thought the engines were for a cruise missile. Couldn't beleive they'd attach a man to it let alone two. God I wish I actually learnt things from him!
@donjones47192 жыл бұрын
SLS is another version of Delta? Sir, the lawyers for the Delta family have just filed a suit for libel.
@idigbebop Жыл бұрын
Excellent review. I spent 27 years on Delta launch pads.
@kenhelmers26032 жыл бұрын
Really like this historical review! Thanks Scott
@UpLateGeek2 жыл бұрын
That was a great dig about calling the SLS a Delta. You should totally call it Delta-SLS from now on!
@TheAmazingCowpig2 жыл бұрын
Delta II Heavy, I just really like the thing; definitely somewhere on my top favorite orbital launch vehicles. I dunno, I think it just LOOKS right. A simple long tube, single engine at the bottom, and "added more boosters".
@mikerichards60652 жыл бұрын
Great video series - thank you Scott. Any chance of a similar one for the Titan?
@topsecret18372 жыл бұрын
After this do you plan on doing a detailed history of the Titan rocket Family?
@howardjohnson21382 жыл бұрын
I always like your presentations. Thank you for all the study and hard work.
@LordFalconsword2 жыл бұрын
All those decades of launches, and Falcon9 has beaten it in just a few years. Truly astounding.
@RollWithTheChanges Жыл бұрын
I LOVE THE EXTRA-EXTENDED LONG TANK THOR!!
@_mgde_2 жыл бұрын
So….history of Titan next??
@MCsCreations2 жыл бұрын
Really, really interesting history, Scott! Thanks! 😃 Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
@ZeroSpawn2 жыл бұрын
I came for the Scott Class, i hit the like button once i saw the shirt. I don't care what your ex says, you Rock! 🙌🏾
@brucefrye87992 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much Scott I've enjoyed this series
@brucefrye87992 жыл бұрын
Btw love you t shirt in this video
@One_High_Guy_4202 жыл бұрын
I love to listen to you while im stoned.
@NeonsStyleHD2 жыл бұрын
That shuttle launch. Interesting flare between the booster and the shuttle up near the top of the left booster. What is it? 1:09
@iitzfizz2 жыл бұрын
Great series Scott
@MrHichammohsen12 жыл бұрын
I rewatched the previous two videos before this, and i think if you put them together like a documentary it would be amazing!
@buttersPbutters2 жыл бұрын
The kindest thing one can say about Delta IV is that it was significantly less expensive than Titan IV, which was significantly less expensive than Shuttle. It's all relative...
@richb3132 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the update Scott seems that years of experience cannot overcome changes in technology and more complicated mission requirements.
@MarcusHollinger2 жыл бұрын
great video always loved the delta rockets 🚀
@ryanrenolds2 жыл бұрын
You commented 1 Minute after the Video was published how do you know its good
@MarcusHollinger2 жыл бұрын
@@ryanrenolds its a scott manley video
@mikehenning17912 жыл бұрын
Great video very insightful thanks please do more history videos on different rockets
@BugsydorPrime2 жыл бұрын
Gotta say, those Graphite Epoxy Motors were truly outrageous.
@zapfanzapfan2 жыл бұрын
"Ballast", showing image of astronauts... I chuckled 🙂
@echoharmony9262 жыл бұрын
SLS definitely belongs with the Delta IV when you look at the cost.
@ewetoo2 жыл бұрын
Got me with the benefits of rockets flying without unnecessary ballast" *shot of astronauts* 😬 And then Delta has a little disaster of its own...ugh.well played sir.
@nathanel13132 жыл бұрын
Well I guess it was mostly about one person of that crew
@Joshs4stro2 жыл бұрын
can’t wait for the delta V launch in a couple of hours! 😁
@JMurph20152 жыл бұрын
There's something about the Delta IV Heavy that is just so kickass, what an absolute unit of a rocket. I know Falcon and Falcon Heavy absolutely outperform it, but I'll still have some nostalgia for the Delta IV-H
@josephalexander38842 жыл бұрын
Most of your math is beyond me; however please keep adding it. Great video, thank you very much. Excellent video, thank you.
@jamesshutchison52972 жыл бұрын
That was a wonderful series particularly for the corps of aging geeks. Thank you .
@tomhill46172 жыл бұрын
The Delta GOES explosion from 1986 has a guest appearance on The Martian as the exploding supply rocket.
@matthewbond50282 жыл бұрын
Oh wow! You were at Vandenberg for the last launch?! It was a great launch I crawled out of bed and drove out there to go watch it.
@krazyhorse00742 жыл бұрын
Well done Scott
@georgemancuso95972 жыл бұрын
Good to see an informational video
@lonnieholcomb20782 жыл бұрын
I enjoy this kind of video, always fun
@rickstorm41982 жыл бұрын
Great content Scott
@bf17012 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't it have been quite the memory to have the last Delta II launch melt your car to slag?
@oldfrend2 жыл бұрын
i wasn't prepared for that plot twist ending! delta V go!
@grahambuckerfield46402 жыл бұрын
Maybe it lives on longer than we think, after all on the timeline of the movie, in 2036 a Delta had an identical failure to 50 years before when launching the probe to re supply Mark Watney on Mars!
@mirien72772 жыл бұрын
I'm definitely gonna start calling sls delta 5
@KernelLeak2 жыл бұрын
I think Delta-V would be more appropriate...
@gordonstewart57742 жыл бұрын
Better than Senate Lobby System.
@davidlabedz20462 жыл бұрын
An interesting history of the Thor/Delta/......SLS, family
@76luislara2 жыл бұрын
The Space Shuttle suppose to take over the Delta rockets, but after the Challenger accident, it was clear that NASA will never reach the cadence of 24 or more flights a year, so that's when Delta II was created and from 1989 to the earlier 2010s became the workhorse for NASA.
@coolguy133332 жыл бұрын
In school we did a thing where we had to make cool concepts in class and I drew something called: the delta 5” it was supposed to be a mix of the delta 2 and delta 3. the main rocket is like a esa Vega c rocket with boosters and a green second stage.
@Globovoyeur2 жыл бұрын
As I recall, Air Force Secretary Edward Aldridge resisted the push to move launches to the shuttle, thereby keeping expendable booster production going. When Challenger was lost, he became a hero to the military.
@NebraskaWarningSirens2 жыл бұрын
Delta 4: I do not want to go:( ULA:but you have served us well Delta 2 :what happened to me was I not good enough??
@ExtroniusAttributes2 жыл бұрын
Notice how the design of one second stage (3:30 in the video) includes a "miniskirt." Delta was nothing if not hip to fashion.
@rafaeldiaz68552 жыл бұрын
Dear..regarding the Delta ..any book to buy...for more information ?..Thks
@SusEngineSFS Жыл бұрын
"You expected you were completely new, but it was I, Delta!" -Delta to SLS, probably
@joyl78422 жыл бұрын
15:32 that looks like a modified oil rig. Whatever happened to those Sea Launch platforms? Sounds like something SpaceX might want, or their specs, if they are still around.
@scottmanley2 жыл бұрын
Currently docked in Russia
@joyl78422 жыл бұрын
@@scottmanley Thank you!
@nobelchurch43382 жыл бұрын
Thinking sls is the next/last delta variant is definitely a plus for sls in my book!
@charlieturner58312 жыл бұрын
What do you think of the James Cameron's Avatar space shuttle? Could the design work and are we capable of launching something of that size?
@squidwardfromua2 жыл бұрын
...benefits of rockets flying without unnecessary ballast _showing shuttle crew_
@dannypipewrench533 Жыл бұрын
Vulcan is essentially the child of Atlas and Delta. It, of course, will use Centaur as a second stage, a first stage with similar diameter as Delta IV, and the SRMs I believe are based on those used by Atlas. Alright, it is essentially a new Atlas vehicle, but the way I see it is if you built a Delta IV out of Atlas V parts.