"I used an op-amp correctly!" OMG that is so relatable.
@Teklectic3 жыл бұрын
Op-Amps: Tiny black boxes full of witchcraft!
@tobbleboii59883 жыл бұрын
i use opamps for EVERYTHING, i havn't learned arduino so far and i gotta tell yall opamps are friggn magic, theyre the perfect compromise of analog and digital, take almost no current, have one hell of a supply voltage range and they never break :D
@mattmoreira2102 жыл бұрын
It's so simple! All you need to know is that: 1. An op amp does all it can at its output to keep its inputs at the same voltage; 2. When the + input is greater than the - input, the output swings positive and when the opposite is true, the output swings negative; and 3. No current ever flows in or out the op amp's inputs. Knowing that, you guys won't get it wrong ever again. The rest is pure maths! You love maths, don't you?! 😁 Ps: Dave Jones - from the EEVBlog - has a lovely video tutorial on the subject. Go check it out!
@fred.corp.88883 жыл бұрын
You could improve the optical sensor by using a microcontroller to pulse the transmitter LED really fast, thus creating a carrier frequency, and only look for that specific frequency on the receiver side of the sensor. This way you could tell the difference between ambient light and the TX LED.
@andrewkieran89423 жыл бұрын
This. One advantage of this approach is that you can buy inexpensive 38khz IR receivers that filter out the carrier frequency.
@fred.corp.88883 жыл бұрын
@@andrewkieran8942 Indeed, this would simplify the code ! Though I wonder how complex it would be to do with the hardware he already has.
@albygnigni3 жыл бұрын
Just need a 555 as on some cheap sensors you can find online
@fdavpach3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewkieran8942 well that would jam all your electronics in range with IR like TVs, ACs etc
@BriscoeTech3 жыл бұрын
@@fdavpach Thats easy to work around. You can buy the IR receivers in other frequency's like 52khz for the same price, and can choose one that is not common in tv receivers. Also the key is brightness, you can ajust the brightness of the transmitter led. You do not need to control a tv across the room, only detect if the beam is blocked over afew inches so it can be really dim and still work phenomenally well. Third option is you dont have to leave it running all the time, turn it on only when moving the conveyor belt and homing the board.
@Oysteims3 жыл бұрын
I would look at the "VL53L0X" and "VL53L1X". Both being TOF laser-ranging modules that interface via I2C. Also priced similarly to the ultrasound breakout module. You could mount one directly to the controller card depending on how it will be positioned in the machine.
@grahameida71633 жыл бұрын
I just recommend the same 🤣
@KANahas3 жыл бұрын
He said no I2C though
@olivercouch16513 жыл бұрын
@@KANahas He's looking at sticking a mic on there for the HC-SR04 anyway. So at that point the world's your oyster.
@poptartmcjelly70543 жыл бұрын
If you modulate the IR LED current in the light sensor at a high frequency and AC couple (then filter) the output of the receiver then you could make it immune to ambient light.
@Gentle_Chu3 жыл бұрын
Yeah did this in uni for a project. It also allows you to filter room light away
@icestormfr3 жыл бұрын
Basically: using the Lock-In-Amplifier principle en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock-in_amplifier Could just be done also by a) drive an IR LED by a 50% PWM b) sample the light sensor values at the middle of the on/off periods c) use the amplified difference between on/off sensor value
@goto_53823 жыл бұрын
@@Gentle_Chu same here, if you don't want to filter too much fire the IR LED at the smallest possible dutycycle (
@MattInglot3 жыл бұрын
Fun to see this continuing to progress! Need to figure out some project that requires mass production of PCBs just to have an excuse to build one of these. With the IR sensor, one option is to encode a specific signal that you're looking for, so you can tell noise apart from signal.
@benjefferson86093 жыл бұрын
Rather than using a sensor to detect the position, the pick and place machine I run boards on(Assembleon Topaz) just has the PCB run into an air cylinder and run the conveyor for a second or two longer than it thinks it needs to. Then when it PCB needs to leave the machine, it lowers the air cylinder and runs the conveyor again. Pretty cheap, easy and reliable to precisely locate a PCB. It does use laser distance sensors on other points on the conveyor for different(less positionally sensitive) purposes.
@magnussorensen25653 жыл бұрын
As others already have pointed out, you already have a camera mounted top down. That could be used in numerous ways. 1. Add an Aruco corner on the board and use the camera to calculate the board's position. 2. Add an addressable LED strip underneath the PCB and light one LED at a time until the light disappears. 3. Use edge detection from OpenCV to detect the border of the card. 4. Use the camera to detect an expected footprint on the PCB. Several solutions could be combined to a greater effect. Good luck. =)
@robertomoreno81033 жыл бұрын
Maybe you could try with the VL53Lxx time of flight sensor?
@JonathanBuford3 жыл бұрын
I second this. These are tiny and robust to light levels.
@aterxter34373 жыл бұрын
just a little idea that i tested just for a proof of concept a year ago : black plastic trash bags are transparent for thermal cameras (glass, on the other hand is opaque), thus they bloc most of visible spectrum bu are very transparent to IR wavelentghs. Just by putting one or two thicknesses of garbage bag, I decreased a lot the sensitivity to visble light of an infrared barrier I salvaged in an old printer, maybe you can use this property of a such low-end product to your benefit in terms of reliability of infrared sensors
@ericcmcgraw3 жыл бұрын
Put an LED below the board, move down-looking camera above LED, and you now have a photo-interrupter which can detect the board edge independent of what it looks like.
@poptartmcjelly70543 жыл бұрын
What about TOF laser sensors like VL53L0x ?
@GroovBird3 жыл бұрын
Those things are tiny and not expensive at all.
@grahameida71633 жыл бұрын
Ha I just recommended the same..
@andriilogoshko88813 жыл бұрын
I'd say that VL6180 might be better fit, since there is no need for long range detection www.st.com/en/imaging-and-photonics-solutions/vl6180.html#overview
@photoswisscore3 жыл бұрын
On our professionnal convoyer we had on our SMT line, we had originally optical sensors, but the trouble was with the sun. I worked on a proximity sensor manufacture, we replaced the original one by customs one with red light and IR sensor, like this we avoid sun problems!
@cheryldroffner4433 жыл бұрын
Love your op amp combat segment! So fun. Personally I’d use a break beam sensor that modulates the IR to reject ambient light. Cheaper DOM smaller and a dependable digital signal out.
@cadmiumgames3 жыл бұрын
found you last week, love your energy and passion!
@AltMarc3 жыл бұрын
What is the problem of using the camera to looking for the edge of the boards ? (before calibrating) Just put camera in X,Y pos. to wait for the board, while conveying let OpenCV watch... You could put a rgb Led below, if OpenCV would make a problem.not finding the edge.
@siberx43 жыл бұрын
In addition to the other suggestions to use a carrier frequency for the IR sensor, it's possible to get much smarter on the analog side with more op-amp magic/filtering. You can set up hysteresis to reduce noise and multiple triggering, and it's possible to build a circuit that dynamically adjusts to ambient light by only watching for fast changes in light output, with the "baseline" off reference constantly adapting to the long-term light level. This allows you to make your comparator trigger threshold much more aggressive because it's now "light level relative to current ambient light" rather than an absolute light level; this will also help with different reflectivities as you simply tune the comparator sensitivity to the "worst case" and it works equally well with more reflective boards. I built something like this to detect flashing headlights/emergency lights years ago in combination with a photodiode and some lenses/filters and it worked surprisingly well, outputting a very clean on/off signal any time the sensor's illumination level changed fast enough. Worked equally well in daytime and darkness in an outdoor but covered application. It was set up with a multiple-minute time constant for the baseline reference adjustment, so as long as your panel edge detection takes less than a minute or so you should be able to adapt to any other light level changes in the area well. That being said, this still doesn't resolve the small sensor potentially causing problems on board cut-outs, although you can likely mitigate that in software by having it scan past the "edge" of the board and seeing if it becomes visible again within a few mm (which would help with all but the largest cut-outs). The ultrasonic sensor is likely simpler, but it will take up a lot more space on the machine and will be a lot more expensive than a IR detector arrangement - maybe not critical considerations for a project like OpenPnP.
@DavidKenny643 жыл бұрын
I would think your down-looking camera would be able to detect the board edge.
@nikkismith87503 жыл бұрын
Agreed, just what I was thinking. And you already have that camera built into the system, so no increase in BOM cost or complexity. It might be hard(ish) to detect the PCB panel from a single static image (different soldermasks, size of board, etc) but it should be much easier to identify exactly where the leading edge of the PCB is as it moves by comparing images from the camera before and after a set amount of belt movement?
@ericcmcgraw3 жыл бұрын
Put an LED below the board, move down-looking camera above LED, and you now have a photo-interrupter which can detect the board edge independent of what it looks like.
@petermuller6083 жыл бұрын
Most likely the camera is in another subsystem then the conveyor belt, thus cannot be easily be used for this purpose from a software side
@Uzwel3 жыл бұрын
Capacitive Proximity switch is sad to be left out 😔
@felixwillmann48773 жыл бұрын
Those were the first things I thought about too
@ohadreu68653 жыл бұрын
Probably big difference if the PCB has a ground plane or not, isn't it?
@wi_zeus67983 жыл бұрын
@@ohadreu6865 very likely not. Plain plastic for example can be detected with capacitive sensors very easily. Extreme precision isn't really needed in this use case
@andymouse3 жыл бұрын
Probably not the first, but did you consider TOF (Time of Flight)...cheers.
@azyfloof3 жыл бұрын
I came here for this reply :P Was gonna mention Seon using them to pretty good effect :D
@narwodev3 жыл бұрын
@@azyfloof me too....I've already mentioned them to Stephen....
@exmachina49713 жыл бұрын
Just wanted to write the same ;-)
@CarlM_UK3 жыл бұрын
me too.. VL53L1X TOF from ST, it is more of a point measurement though rather than the cone the ultrasonic gives you
@theAGanimators3 жыл бұрын
If you mount the TOF sensor to the head, you can have the head move to a specific X location so you can stop the board at the optimum location, or even at multiple locations so you can assemble pcbs that are longer than your X travel allows. You can also change the Y location so you can deal with PCBs that have cutouts that cause the board to stop in the wrong X location. Check out the iPulse M10/M20 or S10/S20; it does something similar.
@Wright4TheJob3 жыл бұрын
Love the use of Soylent boxes for project storage. I do the same thing!
@joschi18183 жыл бұрын
There are optical sensors based on reflexion wich dont send out light all the time but with a specific frequenzy wich the sensor is expecting to get back. With this princip the sensor can compensate other light sources. Because they can compare the light intensity when the led is on and of and/ore only give an output when the send out frequenzy is coming back.
@CraigBurden13 жыл бұрын
The way I use IR reflection sensors is to sample with and without the TX LED on. Then I look at the difference between these two readings as my output. What this does is if there is ambient light on the sensor both readings have the common mode signal and thus the difference is cancelled out. So what the signal represents is purely the difference due to the reflection. It works great for me! Of course this relies on the two samples not having different common mode components, ie the lighting doesn't change . But that is easy to solve but just sampling the two very soon after each other. I use this solution with that exact same IR sensor to reliably sense whether the lid is on my product or not for tamper detection. Also, the lid of my product is matte black ABS, so the reflectivity isn't even very good. But with some very basic filtering and taking a few interleaved samples as I described above, it works absolutely perfectly. One more note, if you decrease the current limit resistor on the TX LED (within the maximum current rating of course) and increase resistance of the pull-up on the output. This drastically improves the sensitivity of the sensor. The sensor is marketed as having a range of a few millimeters, but I reliably use it at ~25mm.
@OddlyIncredible3 жыл бұрын
I'd have gone the beam-interruption route and watched two spots on the board feed rail on the inlet side with a small known distance between them, (say, 0.5-1cm, although I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to go smaller) and similarly two on the outlet, and with a little processing it would be trivial to know when the board was at the right spot coming into the work area (trip #1 then #2 and when #1 goes off you know it's between #1 and #2) as well as far enough out to be safely out of the way. Also, if you want to get more complicated you can do remarkably precise locating with a small camera and OpenCV. I have a project that uses two laser diodes a carefully selected distance from each other and at a carefully set angle between them, and with a camera looking at a target (a simple sheet of paper) and feeding the image into OpenCV, and some filtering and trigonometry applied to the image, I'm able to get sub-millimeter distance measurements. Just the movement from blowing air on the target paper is enough movement to detect, so I had to clamp it between clear plastic and fix the camera to it so nothing could move except for the target.
@eerotapanainen3 жыл бұрын
Man, i loved the edits on this video. For some reason it kind of hyped up the "next part" of the video. Good work!
@ChunkySteveo3 жыл бұрын
What about a time to flight range sensor? Those are very reliable.
@reg25903 жыл бұрын
Agreed - board distance is small enough not to be a problem
@needtobuild3 жыл бұрын
Have you looked at the ST VL53L1X or L0X? It’s a very stable IR laser based distance sensor. I’ve got some I can send you
@der.Schtefan3 жыл бұрын
Reflective sensors in such a setting often modulate the signal and use signal correlation to find out what comes from the sensor and what from ambient. You would need a MCU to do this as well, so the ultrasound option is so much easier to apply in your case.
@craigs52123 жыл бұрын
If other things don't work out take a look at the AD7745 -- its a capacitance to digital converter. Its range is around +/- 4 pF, may be possible to sense the board transit through the dielectric changes. Just a thought.
@TrevorPeac0ck3 жыл бұрын
The "Sharp IR" sensors (GP2Y0A21YK0F) are essentially an IR LED with a small half angle (narrow beam) and a linear/2d optical sensor (line scan camera). It essentially uses parallax measurement to calculate distance. They're a little pricey, considering an IR beam is probably all you need. A bright IR LED and phototansistor, both with a narrow angle. If you measure the phototransistor with the led on and off, and take the difference, you can figure if the board is in place (independent of background light). Would work as a "beam" sensor with LED and PT on opposite sides of boards, or a reflectance sensor if mounted on the same side. With a bright enough LED I wouldn't expect a matte PCB soldermask to be a problem. The SFH4545 and TEFT4300 would be a good starting point.
@Coderjo.3 жыл бұрын
I think that optical sensor is actually designed for detecting paper in printers, if it is like others I found when I was looking into similar sensors a while back.
@larzukpandemonium34283 жыл бұрын
Super cool channel! Thank's for sharing every details about your pnp project! Sending good vibes from france, have a nice day!
@misterm15023 жыл бұрын
Break beam optical sensor at the rail where you guide the PCB panel? If it runs trough it gets triggered. Should be much more easier and cost effective. You could then implement a couple of them to detect stations( placement, soldering station) sensor like the GP1S23
@jamess17873 жыл бұрын
How only 5k views!? These are unreal videography and composition skills. Loved the resistor toss-up, I feel your pain.
@coatduck3 жыл бұрын
Stephen this was shot beautifully and I loved it
@oz.3 жыл бұрын
why not just flip a limit switch upside down? maybe a lil spring mount or something for different board sizes
@oz.3 жыл бұрын
or even crazier idea, two limit switched that sandwich the board :o
@bobweiram63213 жыл бұрын
How about adding a resistor to the analog output signal such that the range is between 0 and the threshold voltage of a transistor gate? Some light sensors requires shielding from ambient light in order to operate reliably. BTW, are you Polish?
@mikesnapper90013 жыл бұрын
can't you use the camera on the nozzle to detect the edge of the board, when it rolls into frame, through computer vision?
@xxportalxx.3 жыл бұрын
Little tip, although technically you can use an opamp as a comparator, it's recommended you use a dedicated comparator instead. There's an interesting timing issue with saturation that occurs in opamps, but they tend to work better in this application in general really.
@FullFormFreedom3 жыл бұрын
Hey! love the project. I've worked with a bunch of IR sensors you might wat to take a look at the GP2Y0D805Z0F. It seems te be pretty much everything you are looking for. Pololu makes some nice breakout boards. It uses some form if IR traiangulation insted of just the amout of light reflected, so it shouldn't be influenced by outside lightsources. And it already produces a digital output without extrenal components.
@arnauddurand1273 жыл бұрын
Since there is already a camera for placing components, why not use it to detect PCBs?
@spencer9613 жыл бұрын
If you go the ultrasonic route, you could use an attiny ic to make the relative footprint of the sensor far smaller.
@ExplodingWaffle1013 жыл бұрын
inductive or capacitive sense could be interesting ideas, they come as modules that screw in and have simple outputs. ultrasonic seems useable tho
@JohnKha3 жыл бұрын
The best part is no part... use your fiducial camera, have a specific pattern printed below the PCB pathway, when it doesn't register that pattern, the board is there.
@hansaya3 жыл бұрын
I dont know whether anyone mentioned this but you can use VL53L0X or time of flight sensor. Very easy to use and can be directly pugged into i2C bus.
@fyremoon3 жыл бұрын
I know with reversing sensors that if they get dirty they give false readings, so if you mount then top down you won't get dirt and dust on the sensors. Additionally, with optical sensors a shroud is often used around the sensor to prevent unwanted light triggering a false reading.
@pacmancoder3 жыл бұрын
Daym that was some quality editing
@duality4y3 жыл бұрын
Personally i love seeing you struggle with op-amps. I have never had any troubles with them and to me they are very understandable :)
@yoctoflop3 жыл бұрын
This reads as a thinly veiled insult.
@duality4y3 жыл бұрын
@@yoctoflop it was never meant as an insult. I love his videos :)
@christopherkelly82453 жыл бұрын
I would use a photoelectric proximity sensor or capacitive proximity sensor we use them on a few conveyors at work that look straight up to detect if a box is on the conveyor.
@XxmadmanxX123543 жыл бұрын
could you not edge detect with the face down camera to find the leading edge of the boards?
@oswynfaux3 жыл бұрын
Flip up stop with sensor (micro switch or optical break) will give consistent stop positions. Put the axis of rotation perpendicular to the feed direction so it will move away and down when retracted.
@ikocheratcr3 жыл бұрын
If the board will always ride on the rail, just put an optical (obstruction) sensor there. Direct digital output, and ambient light "immune".
@rodun3 жыл бұрын
my samsung pick and place uses ones like 1:52, it has dark covers over the work area though and does get confused if a hole suddenly aligns perfectly.
@angelovalerio99843 жыл бұрын
There is an ultrasonic sensor which outputs is analog, you can check the dfrobot site. Great video!
@webslinger20113 жыл бұрын
I wonder if an inductive sensor can be used. Similar to one for the Z axis on the Creality CR10s Pro V1.
@nathanielbrough9903 жыл бұрын
Why not use the overhead camera. If you get some coloured card to put underneath the pnp, I.e. hot pink, because no one makes hot pink pcbs. It could be as simply as taking the average colour across a column of pixels. Means no extra BOM at all. Otherwise capacitive sensors can be good too. And the hardware for a capacative sensor is built into the stm32s
@jackasom3 жыл бұрын
Great video, love your enthusiasm. My 0.02USD: I think you might be better off using a capacitive proximity sensor for this application. They are widely used in industry for detecting objects, for example on an automated assembly line. Inductive proximity sensors might work too, but I'm not sure. 🤷
@MobiusHorizons3 жыл бұрын
have you considered time of flight sensors (much like the sonar, but much smaller / easier to mount)
@jetraid3 жыл бұрын
Could you use the camera to detect the position?
@kindut89523 жыл бұрын
I loved the shot at 8:26
@FranzzInLove3 жыл бұрын
I still think you should use the camera with some edge detection algorithm and possibly a uniform background behind the PCB. No additionnal sensor required. Plus doesn't openpnp has already some form of image recognition that you could maybe use?
@JonathanKayne3 жыл бұрын
Makes me wonder if using an attiny microcontroller would work for your sensor
@cubiee-sci61903 жыл бұрын
Capacitive limit switches should work perfectly in this case they come as PNP or NPN output and most models can be fine tuned with a trim pot
@guillermorodriguez22953 жыл бұрын
Trying to use a this to detect a board in machine repeatability is going to be a pain just use a stop then clamp like older PNP machines.(I think tuning this per board would get old quick and especially if you start getting into double sided boards) It would still work well for a sema interface for detecting when the board enters, exits or is in que on the conveyor.
@patchlead3 жыл бұрын
Great content, love the story shifts 8-)
@Roobotics3 жыл бұрын
I honestly think the IR sensors are way more suited for this. You do NOT want a reflectance sensor though. You want a beam-break sensor. You already have a lower bound where your PCBs ride the belts, they can't go lower than that. So a sensor that either overlaps past the belts contact point, or is at the intersection of where they start/stop.
@Space5983 жыл бұрын
I think a capacitive proximity sensor would be good to use here. Saves you the additional microcontroller.
@hafo8213 жыл бұрын
I love your work dude!!
@youssefaly973 жыл бұрын
You can control the LED on and off and take a reading of the sensor with it on and off, subtract both measurements and you've got a reading immune to light, do this many times a second and take a moving average and you've got a decent sensor.
@deefadale3 жыл бұрын
Reuse an existing sensor... your camera! Advantages: no extra BOM, can configure the board stop location in software (per job if required!). Simply move your down looking camera to XY position and activate conveyor. Stop conveyor when board enters camera frame (eg detect a significant change in pixel values in middle zone of image ). OpenPNP then takes over with fiducial search, starting at your configured board stop position. Simples.
@sobertillnoon3 жыл бұрын
So, how does your opamp comparator differ from a Schmitt Trigger?
@PhotonLukas3 жыл бұрын
You could also use one of these "IR Infrared Obstacle Avoidance Sensor"
@DanBowkley3 жыл бұрын
I'd just go the lazy simple way and put a microswitch through the side of the conveyor rail so the edge of the board triggers it. You could use maybe five of them and select which you want based on how big the board is and where you want it to stop.
@stigjoergensen60723 жыл бұрын
What about inductive - as used by 3d printers for Z probing?
@dumle293 жыл бұрын
I'd be pretty cool to see you try and implement a solution with openCV as well. Simplest way to detect the PCB that I can think of would probably be background subtraction while the PCB is moving in, which should give you a pretty great outline that you could then find the contours of.
@40Grit1952 жыл бұрын
I ordered one . Can you print the parts before it shows up ?
@stepanrydval7363 жыл бұрын
How about ToF sensor?
@AntonEMaes3 жыл бұрын
As an alternative, a panasonic GP2Y0A21YK0F would also probably work well or a VL6180x but the last one is probably overkill for this application
@markmurphy12053 жыл бұрын
It would be much simpler to use The break beam light sensor. A board is there or not. It’s not going to be transparent. You just need the leading edge, whole in the board should not be an issue. And you can control the sensitivity so ambient light has less impact.
@joshhaughton18933 жыл бұрын
How were you viewing the live feedback on your computer screen? Looked like you were using the arduino..
@dstensnes3 жыл бұрын
how about a switch from the side of the board, that pops out when the board has passed?
@spezidrohne95803 жыл бұрын
Why dont u Try light barrieres from SICK? I have really good experience with them. They also make light switches with laser or normal leds
@louisvandendriessche5343 жыл бұрын
Where do you buy your components
@fusspawn3 жыл бұрын
If having a limit switch pushing up on the board is bad. mount it above instead so it pushes down..
@rewatkargaurav37873 жыл бұрын
A laser sensor would be more accurate. Tx onn one side of the board and Rx on opposite. Modulate it with a AC for better performance.
@NielsNL683 жыл бұрын
I have question are you in business of doing Open Source customer project around the ESP32-A1S making it breakout board with extra stuff. I made already the schema but the next step is to much for me. I'm just a programmer.
@OscarSommerbo3 жыл бұрын
The ir light sensor was doomed from the start, the difference in reflectivity of different materials and ambient light disqualified it. Capacitive Proximity sensors have been suggested, I a sceptical as PCBs are nonconductive until you hit a trace, thus you need a ground plane or a trace as a border around the pcb. You mentioned beam breaks, those would be fantastic for precision but you need components spread out potentially getting in the way. The ultrasonic sensor is bulky but it is contained on a single board which means it will be quite easy to install under the pcb out of the way of moving parts, and your resolution of 1 mm is way more than needed. I wouldn't sweat the extra microcontroller too much, this is a complicated machine and building one small sub assembly is not a great increase in complexity.
@leadproblem3 жыл бұрын
Why not use a distance sensor??
@TalpaDK3 жыл бұрын
If only you had a moveable downward looking camera that could be moved to a given spot (with a coloured marker below it) and a computer already running computer vision, the detection of the pcb position could be 100% "free" but would require some software... Oh well... I'm also one of those that think you didn't give the optical sensor much of a chance, with ambient light it needs modulation and band pass (or at least high pass) filtering. They also do come with different focus distances though I would use a setup where the beam was interrupted as most PCBs are IR opaque
@edward4magic3 жыл бұрын
VL53L0X you can get one for about 2 dollars on Ali or Amazon and get submilimeter acuracy in prety much all lighting conditions.
@derrogers3 жыл бұрын
i use a capacitive probe for auto bed leveling my glas bed 3d printer. works a treat... give it a try. its reliable, cheap and readily available.
@MajdMazin3 жыл бұрын
You should look into MaxBotix Ultrasonic sensors. They might have something that you are looking for
@LyLeap3 жыл бұрын
Maybe use a laser module with a ldr on top then if the laser is detected by ldr mean nothing is interfering and if ldr sense nothing mean there is a board there
@mutthunaveen3 жыл бұрын
Ultrasonic sensors accumulate dust... Better not sure it for long term... Use ir sensor one end and photo diode at other end opposite and let PCB break the light path for detection....
@Chrisknot943 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure an optical limit switch similar to those used in 3d printers would as well...
@ashwinabhang2293 жыл бұрын
i have an idea to use hcsr04 without microcontroller, it can give digital and analog both output.😁✌️also its super cheap.
@cyrilanthony7773 жыл бұрын
why not inductive sensors ? can't it detect the copper on the pcb?
@TalpaDK3 жыл бұрын
Only if the edge of the pcb has copper in it (the antenna side of a pcb may have a large area without copper)
@shoofle3 жыл бұрын
I don't know shit but it would be interesting to use computer vision to do this with the camera on the manipulator head.
@larsfroelich3 жыл бұрын
Cool shirt! I use gather every day :) Where did you get it?
@GijsvanRoij3 жыл бұрын
since PCBs contain conductive materials, maybe an Capacative Proximity sensor? something like the MTCH101. and then have a long strip of copper on a pcb as the sensor? So basicly a small metaldetector. something like that would be less than 1 euro in parts. EDIT: this is not correct. as @Uzwel pointed out. With capacitive sensing you could sense a lot of different materials.
@Uzwel3 жыл бұрын
Capacitive doesn't need metal to trigger, inductive does :)
@GijsvanRoij3 жыл бұрын
@@Uzwel yep you are right, I mixed my capacitive with inductive. Capacitive should also be able to detect the fiberglass that the pcb is made of.
@pioneer19433 жыл бұрын
Hahah first lol. I have been eagerly waiting for this :)