QUADRALink Rear Suspension Kits - Detroit Speed Tech Talk Ep. 010

[@modgrip805]

I had almost no idea what you were talking about but I still know I want to give you all my money 🤷‍♂️

[@Chris-zm7wh]

Great products but with the bushings and moving parts where are the greese fittings?

[@duane9707]

Look forward to seeing products for the foxbody. I'm actually flying to Michigan this week to buy a no rust 89 gt convertable.

[@detroitspeed]

Awesome! We'll have more coming soon.

[@everamador1340]

Would love to put this kit on my 69 c10 with the c7 floater kit

[@detroitspeed]

It can be done!

[@Mopar_Taxi_Guy]

Any plans to bring out some kits for the 60s Mopar muscle cars?

[@detroitspeed]

Mopar is on our engineering list.

[@Mopar_Taxi_Guy]

@@detroitspeed good to hear.

[@ryanharte528]

I wish y'all would have just improved on the 3 link or torque arm system. For 3rd gen Camaro's I don't see how this is better or has better geometry.

[@detroitspeed]

Ryan, here is what one of our customers had to say to compare our setup to the torque arm. "Been able to get rid of a lot of nose dive on hard braking by ditching the torque arm. 2. This also has allowed me to dial in more rear brake without locking them as well. Car would violently bounce the rear axle off the pavement when this happened with a torque arm. 3. Actually allowed me to tuck the exhaust up higher in the trans tunnel area, and it is a rare occurrence for the exhaust to contact pavement now. 4. Car is a lot smoother and quieter on the highway, and I don’t feel/hear the torque arm banging when loading or unloading the torque arm."

[@02badfnz]

Cough 4th gen cough

[@RSChris666]

4th gen and 3rd gen rear suspension are the same.

[@XenoSeven86]

@@RSChris666 Wonder why Detroit speed doesn’t list it as a 4th gen option?

[@Riptidevulture]

It does look much better but there's still a ton of unsprung weight there. U want better handling - get rid of that solid axle completely. The whole car would be ligher, too.