Continuous Delivery: Sounds Great But It Won't Work Here - Jez Humble

Since the Continuous Delivery book came out in 2010, it’s gone from being a controversial idea to a commonplace… until you consider that many people who say they are doing it aren’t really, and there are still plenty of places that consider it crazy talk. In this session Jez will present some of the highlights and lowlights of the past six years listening to people explain why continuous delivery won’t work, and what he learned in the process.

[@YourDeKay]

So many valuable insights - thanks a lot for sharing!

[@THEMithrandir09]

Dude that pain ridden laughter at 14:17 I know it all too well :(

[@logiciananimal]

Rubber chicken mutex, interesting. Also, on NIST and the AWS certification: the controls are supposed to be allocated as instances, so there are in practice sometimes more than the few hundred _types_ (or classes) mentioned for any non-trivial system. There may also be less; the parallel Canadian process is clear enough that only ones that apply to a given system (based on their governing instruments) are to apply (and there is a way to determine this). That said, I agree - the "we're regulated" is not an excuse. (I do hear it, still, alas.)