Did Dinosaurs Really Go Extinct?

[@Moonbeam143]

Remember, kids. When the bully from school calls you a chicken, just remember that chickens come from dinosaurs, and you can just eat that bully's face any time you want.

[@cubiccrowgoji8353]

Kk

[@unvergebeneid]

Moonbeam ... that chickens _are_ dinosaurs ...

[@husboy1]

GojiPlayz56 KKK

[@megasupreme9985]

+alhanaei a They evolved from dinosaurs, and they are dinosaurs! Theyre just a new spiecies...

[@unvergebeneid]

Joshua Lowrie Maybe two new species.

[@wheezywaiter]

A giant rooster is more terrifying than a T. rex.

[@besmart]

Helluva wake-up call too

[@zeiitgeist]

Guess nobody ever heard of a cockatrice.

[@Blasteroid01]

zeiitgeist The Mythological Chicken-Lizard beast?

[@zeiitgeist]

Blühende Blume Yes, the giant feathered chicken lizard thing that breathes fire.

[@Blasteroid01]

Oh yeah, it breathes fire, that too.

[@connorhalleck2895]

Holy crap this intro was phenomenally well done! Props to whoever put that together

[@SallyLePage]

This is such a good episode! Just the combination of great graphics and editing and breadth of content was fab!

[@besmart]

Sally Le Page Thanks Sally!

[@plefevre]

It's become my life's work now correcting this error. Nothing "GOES" extinct. Things "BECOME" extinct. Being extinct is a 'state' that a species reaches, they don't 'go there', it's not a place. Using the verb 'go' with extinction is like saying "I lost my job so I went depressed". You would always say "I lost my job so I became depressed". Tell your friends.

[@lightninlad]

Who was that masked man?

[@suelane3628]

Isn't pedantry fun!

[@pixx3461]

The way he says archaeopteryx hurts me...Great video regardless!

[@jonhohensee3258]

I know! It's like fingernails on a chalkboard.

[@thedonpurplemanradiohour2508]

“Scaly reptiles” *shows picture of deinonychus*

[@chipthedino9504]

It’s causes in that time feathers were not known so they just kept the scales

[@kecilce]

When JP came out in 1993, nobody even knew that lots of dino's would have feathers; that came when they started discovering lot of feathered dino's in China in the late 90's. Afterwards, they explained in the Jurassic World that the addition of frog DNA to the Dino DNA changed them.

[@teresawilliams2793]

Okay but if dinosaur dinosaurs were actually alive- I'd think we would notice. I mean we aren't that blinde... expect tiny ones but- Yeah.

[@himexh._]

You are fear me in 3:22

[@christiandiaz2354]

Dinosaurs to Chicken always gets me 😂 🤦‍♂️

[@idojuander6629]

Everytime i eat chicken i always think im eating dinosaur and i said to my self.. SO DINOSAURS IS TASTY

[@itzmonkeygamez4844]

If i hear the word ‘dinosaur’ i think about jurassic world

[@allenlin1590]

Therefore emu war is actually dinosaur war.

[@PrimalBoos]

Parasaurolophus is my favorite animal.

[@boredom4475]

Bruh if birds today have teeth it would be scary af

[@archive2500]

Geese with false teeth are already quite creepy-looking.

[@garygorospe6454]

Safe to say that the asteroid robbed us of some epic fried chicken..

[@arrowsaurus7561]

Huge drumsticks

[@r.i.t.i.k.a]

Or saved us from being epic fried not-so-chicken chicken

[@Wyamerkz]

😂😂

[@eternity801]

KFC KFD

[@alfianfahmi5430]

Beefy chicken

[@ScrapPalletMan]

I like the ending, they are not LIKE dinosaurs they ARE dinosaurs. Good stuff

[@SeelTheDealArt]

@Martin G lmao then what's YOUR answer since apparently the most scientifically plausible theory is completely false

[@jeanscuissiato135]

@Martin G Good joke hahahaha

[@Dexuz]

@Martin G I love how your only argument is saying: "Sorry, It's false" In that case here is my argument. God isn't real.

[@BestBibleStories]

They are not dinosaurs. That's such a stupid thing to say. How does anyone with a brain believe the stupidity presented in this video. Watch it again and see if one single fact is presented. There are no facts presented in this video. Nothing but fantastical opinions.

[@emilengen7825]

@Martin G evolution is a fact.

[@ratatouille1682]

So, KFC should be changed into Kentucky Fried Dinosaurs.

[@ink1929]

Kfd, could also be Kentucky fried dodo

[@ink1929]

Kfd, could also be Kentucky fried dodo

[@josephcrespo7822]

Rata Touille KFD although people might confuse it for Kentucky Fried Dicks XD

[@sammoylivermore9784]

Rata Touille kfd Lol

[@maranofan8759]

Rata Touille ha that's funny lol

[@Krustenkaese92]

"NOT AS SCARY?" A giant chicken is pretty scary ... I already am afraid of the normal ones ..

[@IonianGarden]

***** Cassowaries have killed people.

[@ghuegel]

***** Do you know about terror birds? Those things were horrifying, and they died out only about 2.5 million years ago.

[@godzilloid]

***** Got that right. Velociraptors with feathers. Check out Jacanas as well.

[@ariyatahasin3632]

Me too

[@fantasaurus9178]

Dave Power #6 But terrorbirds were actually herbivores

[@jacoblofthus7908]

So, in a sense, Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds was the original Jurassic Park.

[@alexwuntch3368]

This comment needs more recognition.

[@omnitato6988]

@@alexwuntch3368 100%

[@ChristmasLore]

Today the idea of the movie could seem dumb, yet the suspense is real and the movie is great. Saw it as a kid and never really liked birds , long before I learned they were dinosaurs.

[@louf7178]

Totally different.

[@karlosdaniel6537]

@@ChristmasLore Observation: birds ARE dinosaurs.

[@Wayoftheclay]

"i'm so glad birds don't have teeth anymore" me, thinking of geese: "You sure?"

[@richardblazer8070]

Geese don't technically have teeth, they have tomia, keratin serrations lining their bills and mouths.

[@Wayoftheclay]

@@richardblazer8070 oh that's neat! Still terrifying though XD

[@sdfsdf5924]

E T9,q8aop

[@Lalaloopsies_United]

Goosanders: U forgot me

[@rockroll9761]

I have teeth

[@sparkles-kun2225]

Honey! a dinosaur hit the window again!

[@recommendedforyou7957]

XD

[@bento1732]

Sparkles-kun fuxake

[@nikitanallaian5119]

So....... We humans eat chickens, who’re actually Dinasaurs. Which means we tiny guys eat the once strongest predators on the planet? Savage.

[@doggocat4464]

K. Reimin No, because birds aren’t “the strongest predators.” Ik this is a joke, but I just wanna clarify dinosaurs aren’t all preds.

[@rinsiblerelic5318]

TAC TIMES I’m tired of you, just shut the frick up.

[@doggocat4464]

K. Reimin No, he responded to dozens of comments with this same exact copy-paste message.

[@rinsiblerelic5318]

K. Reimin it’s just kind of annoying that if you look on almost all of the comments that are saying the exact same thing over and over again spamming

[@doggocat4464]

RinsibleRelic - Gaming, Geckos, Hedgehogs and more! Especially since they’re wrong.

[@redboot8]

"You'll never look at birds the same way" - Dr. Alan Grant, jurassic park

[@dapperparraper860]

actually some goose species have teeth and some even have them on their tongue

[@arrowsaurus7561]

Dapper Parraper wtf I’m scared lol

[@blondbraid7986]

I didn't think they were teeth, more like serrated edges on their beaks.

[@metagiga7626]

thanks, i hate it

[@moopig9220]

thats horrifying

[@Derrick-1209]

i have anatidaephobia now

[@hs0003]

... I wouldn't mind a chicken of that size. Imagine how much meat there would be on a chicken wing!

[@RayPoreon]

Emil Tang The muscles would need to be strong enough to support it's entire weight, so the meat would be tough and chewy.

[@RoScFan]

Kinky Fish Which is my favorite kind

[@RayPoreon]

RoScFan **Perv face**

[@hs0003]

Kinky Fish Wouldn't a chicken that size simply not fly at all? Chickens can barely fly at their current size anyway.

[@RayPoreon]

Emil Tang Err...what? No-one mentioned flight.

[@eternalpain232]

So you're telling me the national bird of the US is a dinosaur? Dope.

[@Galiant2010]

Well... ANY national bird is...

[@bigmac3373]

@Ameen Shindoli they are not lizard but giant killer bird

[@jonhohensee3258]

All national birds would be.

[@jackshenhouse]

I've said for years my chickens are yard dinosaurs...

[@romachenko1304]

Lmao

[@famous1240]

HOLY MOLY, I ATE A DINOSAUR THIS MORNING.

[@doggocat4464]

I JUST ATE A COW ... oh wait.

[@SMAB2007]

I'm addicted to dinosaur flesh specifically from the carnivorous saurischains because for some reason, sauropods are saurischains and not ornithischains like every other herbivorous dinosaur. This explains why Spinosaurus is my favourite dinosaur.

[@dundee6402]

Goku Sonfan Why do you eat meat in the morning....

[@FirstNameLastName-fd7ks]

Goku Sonfan LOL

[@EddieLacefield]

MrAsiris23 eggs are not meat😂

[@roguedogx]

so does this mean a T-Rex tastes like chicken? I'm sorry I'll leave now.

[@zachandalex7989]

😂😂

[@1joshjosh1]

Are you serious

[@BestBibleStories]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i2OyqIdsj7p-hbc

[@NRooster]

@@BestBibleStories bruh

[@Burritosaurus]

@@BestBibleStories SHUT UP YOU UNEDUCATED BASTARD

[@Silmerano]

So if i'm understanding this correctly. There is a very strong possibility. That dinosaurs were delicious.

[@GnosticGnoggin]

I wanted to replied to the situation of t by e monarchy holdinnn

[@jonhohensee3258]

Stephen - You didn't pay attention to the video.

[@F15_C]

(thumbnail for context) THEY ARE STILL *WHAT?* ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

[@MB32904]

(bum) bum bum bum bum bum bum bum... badumbum

[@captainstroon1555]

Imagine a flying Dinosaur with wings. Sounds badass? It's called a bird.

[@Demonicidiot]

Captain Stroon XD

[@NighthawkX02]

Now imagine an eagle, a vulture, a hawk, or one of those giant patrels if they were the size of an elefant or even the size of a car. You wouldn't want to step outside...

[@mtf8396]

Captain Stroon ever heard of pterosaurs?

[@unclefreddieDied]

like pterodactyl? never knew it started with a P

[@donareisya2286]

uncle freddie Pterosaurs are flying reptiles NOT dinosaurs

[@PeregrineX7]

What would the actual muscles and flesh of dinosaurs have been like? In other words, would they taste like chicken?

[@laurencegido8653]

Peregrine JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE PLS ANSWER THIS GUY.

[@Singleraxis]

Red, as they're heavy and needed a lot of oxygen to energize their muscles, which requires a lot of blood. I'm not an expert, but I've read somewhere that birds got white meat for endurance and light weight. High likely that it tasted more like beef.

[@isodoublet]

Singleraxis is probably correct. Ostrich meat tastes similar to beef.

[@pro-methean4121]

Maybe somewhere between ostrich and crocodile meat

[@SocramOlrak]

+Singleraxis wrong , they do not were heavy , hollow bones and air sacs inside like the birds ,

[@hello-mw9tz]

Apparently, T-Rex was meant to of had feathers, which personally makes it even more terrifying.

[@ryoushii]

Yeah, think a giant kiwi with a rat tail and a mouth full of 6 inch teeth.

[@themeddite]

Ryoushi Anschauer it looked more like a mane

[@maximaldinotrap]

@@ryoushii Giant Cassowary

[@maximaldinotrap]

@@aravdogra4192 Actually with some of the imprints we have found showing scales I wouldn't be surprised if the rex were slightly feathered more towards the backside.

[@HyperionaSilverleaf]

More like a giant chicken.

[@OutlawMaxV]

So my grandmother is Dinosaur farmer

[@kolportiroas-red983]

Well in 1993 the theory of dinosaurs having feathers wasn't as strong as today so what they do is now their just continuing without the feathers so it not weird how they just randomly get feathers.

[@Blue_Anzu]

Finally, someone understands

[@xdrazormon454]

No wonder why I used to think that velociraptors might’ve well evolved into 🦎 but nope they are related to birds 🦅

[@StefanVeenstra]

JP scientists also used amphibian dna to fill up the holes in broken dino dna. Afaik, there are no feathery amphibians. So the continuation of featherless or proto plumage dinosaurs makes sense. On another note, while the Velociraptors are assumed to be Mongoliensis because of the supposed location the DNA was found, it's actually based off Velociraptor Antirrhopus aka Deinonychus. So the size discrepancy often brought up is a non-argument too.

[@christopherdinoguy8346]

JP was still ahead of it's time as doctor Grant actually acknowledged the fact that velociraptors were more like birds and less like other reptiles, also he acknowledged that brachiosaurus and other dinosaurs were warm blooded.

[@tee-sam-ee-red]

3:06 The most hilarious experiment was actually when scientists put ants on stilts to see if they counted their steps

[@cuca_]

And do they?

[@tee-sam-ee-red]

@@cuca_ they do

[@StudioSambodia]

wish your videos were like an hour long, I can watch these all day.

[@graveserpent]

I feel you there.

[@oldanddeadaccountsumfurryc1359]

Ok, dinosaurs had feathers uh-huh some dinosaurs fly.. There were birds, they didn’t fuse into them, did you even listen or even watch it?

[@rinsiblerelic5318]

TAC TIMES this wasn’t even related to the dinosaurs 🤬

[@kawaiicosplayer6423]

Same

[@MattRieckman]

Actually, many dinosaurs being feathered was not an agreed upon conclusion when the first two Jurassic Park movies were made, not becoming widely discussed intil the late 90s, and not being widely accepted until the 2000s, AFTER Jurassic Park III was made. And Velociraptor itself wasn't confirmed to have feathers until 2007, well after the films were made. The first book itself actually explicitly had a deliberately built-in loop hole for scientific inaccuracies which was discussed, and argued about by the characters, in the book. The scientists didn't know what the DNA was, so they found out by growing it and seeing what they got. When it wasn't what they expected or wanted, they tweaked the DNA and grew another dino from it. So since it was based on their expectations, it naturally wouldn't be accurate. This was not discussed in the first three films but got mentioned in a very clearly laid our rant by Dr. Wu in Jurassic World complaining about being forced to make the park dinosaurs look "cooler". And... the Velociraptor itself was not the Velociraptor mongoliensis mentioned in this video, but a new species (created by the park scientists), in the same genus, called Velociraptor antirrhopus that was actually based on Deinonychus antirrhopus in the books (due to a, now rejected, idea being mulled over at the time that the two species were in the same genus) and the newly discovered but unnamed (at the time) species Utahraptor ostrommaysorum in the movies. Which nearly got called Utahraptor spielbergi in honor of the film.

[@maxrenauldo8604]

good info

[@awesomeanth]

But Jurrasic World has no excuse!

[@Trinexx42]

Actually, it does. Remember at the end of the movie they said that all of their dinosaurs are modified to look cooler. So the "Velociraptors" in the movie have had their feathers genetically removed to look cooler.

[@awesomeanth]

+Nevan Lowe I meant that they can't say that "this is 100% velociraptor" and they have to make up dumb excuses to make there Dinos not fluffy.

[@debonairdinosaur8435]

+Anthony Di Santo bruh... in the movies they specifically talk about how the their dinosaurs are different than the prehistoric dinosaurs because they had to use DNA of living animals like frogs to complete the various DNA sequences.

[@leezanda8430]

AMOGUSSSSS

[@MB32904]

sussy

[@zenmaster8826]

Amogus

[@zenmaster8826]

@@phyclopsphyclops Sus

[@phyclopsphyclops]

@@zenmaster8826 What?

[@zenmaster8826]

@@phyclopsphyclops Amogus

[@myklmyers]

“Life finds a way”

[@shylogik]

“Life Uh, finds a way”

[@kedixsed7095]

So... Since flying birds are relatives of dinosaurs, that kind of makes them.... Dino-soars! 😁

[@Kevin-ci4ky]

。-。

[@Raison_d-etre]

Not really. Dinosaurs are a clade, so everything that came from dinosaurs are dinosaurs, by definition. Fish are not a clade, so even though humans came from fish, we're not fish.

[@christopherherr7561]

@@Raison_d-etre Come off it, he's just having some fun.

[@jonhohensee3258]

@@christopherherr7561 - It's stupid.

[@MB32904]

@@Raison_d-etre wait, so nothing is a fish?

[@debonairdinosaur8435]

XD was so confused on the opening sketch ddnt realize it was Joe, I was like, Who the hell is that guy? I dnt remember him being in jurassic park XD

[@nikolasrpak6187]

They are still AMONG US 😳😰📕$U$

[@AurisMochi]

SUS

[@MB32904]

sussy

[@LeapyGeck]

Oh god , the dinos , they have learned to play amogus

[@MB32904]

sussy

[@thearchivist3610]

Kinda sus thumbnail

[@MB32904]

among sus

[@shafqatishan437]

2:20 Deinoychus was not a scaly reptile either. It was a warmblooded heavily feathered raptor.

[@archive2500]

Facts. It was very active if that is the case.

[@c3ru1ean41]

among us

[@MB32904]

sus

[@katecleary8290]

Honestly I ALREDY knew that they didn’t go extinct but I wanted to hear him talk about it anyway

[@jonhohensee3258]

alredy?

[@Iceaberg17]

Yeah they live in Africa still

[@Kram1032]

Waait what? mammals are technically "older" than reptiles? I always thought that was the other way round.

[@besmart]

Kram1032 To put it most accurately, the *common ancestor* of all mammals branched off back then, that's not quite the same as saying mammals suddenly sprang into being

[@Kram1032]

It's Okay To Be Smart well I suppose so but I thought the common ancestor of mammals came after the common ancestor of reptiles. Or to say it differently, that there already have been "proto-reptiles" which later branched off into actual reptiles and "proto-mammals". But apparently not?

[@Rationalific]

Kram1032 Both reptiles and mammals split off from basal amniotes. As these basal amniotes started diverging, they started to resemble what we see today. But actually, these two lineages split off at exactly the same time (and this is a necessary part of cladistics). You could say that "mammals are older than reptiles", but that's not really true, as the ancestors of mammals and the ancestors of reptiles split at exactly the same time. And really, what is a mammal? Dimetrodon, the reptile-like synapsid, is actually on the "mammal" side of the synapsid/sauropsid divide. But that doesn't mean it was a mammal. If you include it as a mammal (which it isn't), then it's older than the dinosaurs. But if you include the proto-dinosaurs with the dinosaurs, then they go back farther, too. This is similar to how a lungfish is more related to a dog than to a shark. But a lungfish is not a dog, of course...just like proto-mammals (basal synapsids) were not mammals. (Anyway, you are correct that animals _resembling_ reptiles in form were around before animals resembling mammals in form, although some _reptile-like animals_ were actually on the line to becoming mammals...or in most cases dying off without leaving descendants.) I hope this helps! Also, feel free to check this out: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amniote#Cladogram

[@Kram1032]

Rationalific​ I see, that makes sense. Thanks for this detailed explanation :)

[@Rationalific]

Kram1032 No problem!

[@nanabberry965]

Even with feathers dinosaurs have a very Distinct and unique feel to them. I surprisingly like both 'versions' of the idea of the Dinosaurs alot.

[@AtomicBacon568]

It's Okay To Be Second

[@gygggfffffffffffffff]

and first

[@themarsquatch420]

ARK Survival Evolved brought my childhood interest in dinosaurs back stronger than ever.

[@talih7200]

same

[@lucaskebow1781]

Too bad it isn't scientifically accurate in its portrayals of the animals. I suppose it's up to the player to decide if they want to study further I suppose! Still a fun game though.

[@BestBibleStories]

Dinosaurs did not evolve into birds. Anyone who says so is either stupid or lying. It's so sad to see nearly 2 million people are subscribed to such ridiculous nonsense. Feel free to subscribe to my channel if you have any interest in truth.

[@oldanddeadaccountsumfurryc1359]

Idk if that will make anyone sub to you if you say “Anyone who says that is either stupid or lying” that’s not nice.

[@Lilitu4242]

TheDodoEnthusiast yussssss ark is amazing I am addict to it

[@Galiant2010]

When the asteroid showed up all the dinos disappeared. The asteroid, who had been hoping for a good fight, asked the locals "What are you chicken?"

[@Dexuz]

@Ameen Shindoli Those are the reptilians, dinosaurs aren't reptiles, try again.

[@paulusrafaelis4337]

@@Dexuz wait, they are not reptiles?

[@Dexuz]

@@paulusrafaelis4337 No they aren't the thing ks that reptile is not a taxonomical name at all, the scientifical community doesn't use it because its unnacurate. Dinosaurs are related to birds, not to lizards.

[@paulusrafaelis4337]

@@Dexuz so whats the right taxonomical name for them?

[@DINO_X65]

@@paulusrafaelis4337 dinosaurs, there are no other taxonomical names for them as they are their own clade, because if dinosaurs were reptiles then so would mammals be since mammals evolved from reptiles

[@Joegargalini]

Me reading thumbnail: don’t laugh, don’t laugh

[@gianlucabelgrado3624]

Sus

[@brysonjohnson8252]

Go ahead, I won't judge.

[@SPACE.KITTY.]

Yes! I love this video! When my dad rescued a baby duck I told people that we had a baby dinosaur. :) Anyway, want more proof that birds are dinosaurs? Look up the Hoatzin. It's a bird that's alive today that is still born with claws! It looses its claws by adulthood, but as a baby it uses them to climb, which is helpful in case it falls out of its nest into the water that it lives above. Isn't that so cool! :D

[@gustavoramos4557]

Just googled it and the scientific names is Opisthocomus hoazin. They are indeed awesome and look like phoenixes lol

[@SPACE.KITTY.]

Gustavo Ramos Oh my god, they do! I never noticed that before! To me they look like dinosaurs during the transition to birds.

[@craigyoungman8493]

Cool! I've never seen those before! Thanks! Hey, have you ever seen the claws on a plucked ostrich/emu wing? Check this out: blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/ratites-in-trees-the-evolution-of-ostriches-and-kin-and-the-repeated-evolution-of-flightlessness-ratite-evolution-part-ii/

[@SPACE.KITTY.]

craig youngman Holy shit! I had no idea there were still clawed adult dinosaurs! This makes me so happy! :D

[@robinchesterfield42]

Never heard of those things before but yeah...almost like a baby Archaeopteryx! (Well not quite, but you know what I mean.) As for ostriches...you ever seen one of those things in person? ONE good look at a bird at that size, with the same scaly legs they've always had but scaled way up from the little brown birds on your porch, and you don't have to be told by scientists--you KNOW you're in the presence of a dinosaur. I mean, technically you are every time you're near any bird ever...but you know what I mean. Make it bigger, walking, and even _shaped_ like some dinosaurs (Struthomimus aka _ostrich mimic_, anyone?) and suddenly bam! a big ugly mean bird becomes a dino with a fluffy bit in the middle. :)

[@dojokonojo]

This video was criminally short. We need more dino-birds in our lives.

[@poochthedog1]

5:30 polly want a lawyer 😂😂😂😂😂

[@willvr4]

I can't believe you did that. I've always made jokes about how Jurassic park would be way less scary if the T-rex sounded like a chicken because there really is no accurate way to know what they sounded like and it's their closest ancestor.

[@Yahriel]

boy am I glad Canada geese don't have teeth.

[@Blue_Anzu]

Actually chickens (I'm not sure if they're the only birds) have teeth and claws at one point when they're developing in the egg

[@jasonrustandi5692]

Technically, that's not true. Chickens only develop teeth when the talpid2 gene expresses itself in the embryo. The problem is that talpid2 is lethal and the embryo is automatically terminated before birth.

[@uncletammy5025]

I hate geese normally.

[@frapiichino]

SkyWolfAlpha where I live geese do have teeth. I felt it on my butt once ;-; still scared of water birds.

[@jessicalee333]

They DO have teeth. The also have teeth on the sides of their tongues. The inside of a goose's mouth is terrifying.

[@breadmusic1]

That means dino nuggets are made of real dinosaur meat

[@MonsieurWeevil]

It indeed does. Thanks for planting that thought in my head.

[@jgthejason8089]

Dinosaurs would’ve tasted more like beef or crocodile, just because there related to birds doesn’t mean there the exact same.

[@shattermelon496]

​@@jgthejason8089nope. Birds ARE dinosaurs.

[@jgthejason8089]

@@shattermelon496that’s not the point of the comment, I meant as a reply dinosaurs would have tasted more like red meat, at least the bigger ones, despite them being much closer to birds, but their meat wasn’t the exact same.

[@bagandtag4391]

Kawaii Dinosaurs! Come on Japan, I'm waiting

[@joshuahadams]

See: Dinosaur King. It's already a thing.

[@bagandtag4391]

I already know it :P But we need more!!!

[@evolconcept]

Gojira

[@evolconcept]

You will see godzilla in Japan

[@masterofmicrospace1820]

You Are Umasou

[@mischarowe]

This explains how the cuccos in the legend of zelda can kill you so easily.

[@eggvedeon]

AMONG US??? SUS!!!

[@MB32904]

sus

[@gorrillawarfair]

I've always thought dinosaurs had feathers. Not all of them but some of the depictions of them always looked like they would look better with feathers. And it always bugged me as a kid that they knew what color dinosaurs were until i learned they were pretty much guessing

[@MB32904]

yeah, looking at a velociraptor without feathers, I just feel like it's naked, velociraptor doesn't strike me as scaly t rex does strike me as scaly though

[@rcarmisin3465]

Alligators and Komodo look alikes were around when dinosaurs were alive. Sloths and beavers were 20 feet tall once upon a time.

[@WHOOOSHXDOfficial]

Dinosaurs are _AMONG US_ 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖😳😳😳😳😳🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖🦖

[@ClubSealing]

I'm being nit-picky but: In the beginning of the video he says turtles were more related to lizards and snakes (lepidosaurs), but this is only one hypothesis, and there is so much recent evidence placing them with (or as a sister taxon to) archosaurs. There are so many hypotheses to turtle phylogeny, too, so it kinda makes me uncomfortable to see a science video try and state something like that as fact when scientists are constantly butting heads about it. Anyway, it's not the main point of the video, but it kinda urks me lol. (Also you guys talk about archeopteryx as a transition from other more dinosaur-y theropods and modern birds, but it wasn't even technically a bird. I think there's evidence now that birds are more closely related to velociraptors? Could be wrong with that one, though.)

[@lythronax-argestes]

Well, _Archaeopteryx_ is more closely related to birds than it is to _Velociraptor_. Search up a phylogeny of Maniraptora.

[@ClubSealing]

Maybe in some phylogenies. I'm not an expert in that subject (hence the "i think" part), but I had an ornithologist tell me there was recent evidence that velociraptors were more closely related to modern birds. Phylogeny changes over time with more evidence, so who knows.

[@lythronax-argestes]

The _current scientific consensus_ is that _Archaeopteryx_ is more closely related to birds. I wouldn't trust an ornithologist; they generally don't have a lot of background in palaeontology.

[@ClubSealing]

That's fine but considering I stated it as a "could be wrong, not sure" statement and admitted I didn't know a lot about it, you probably could have responded with a bit less attitude. Maybe you didn't mean to come across that way, but the italics and "don't trust other scientists I know better" message was a little harsh and could have been stated in a nicer tone when trying to educate someone who's admitting their ignorance. But thanks for the correction.

[@lythronax-argestes]

Emphasis and a general statement that is usually true, but I can't speak on behalf of my audience.

[@TheCommexoKidMusic]

geese are all the proof you need

[@EddieLacefield]

Sister Hecate they are EVIL

[@Zenigotcha]

Seagulls are more evil

[@a-aronpre-sent1447]

Hissing bastards.

[@Damian-cilr2]

i mean they dont have true teeth but close enough still TERREFYING

[@L96KIING]

65 million years ago lol. He needs to learn a lot from ken ham

[@SocramOlrak]

+DOUBLEAGENTcity sarcasm?

[@L96KIING]

+Karlo Marcos Reyes lol yes

[@SocramOlrak]

DOUBLEAGENTcity xD

[@MikhaelAhava]

It isn't exactly 65, its different in some books (65.5) and...

[@SocramOlrak]

Miguel pmpm the asteroid impacted 67 my Big animals start to going to extintion between the impact and after the Mesozoic Yes, we had land's runners crocodilians after the KT and maybe some non avian dinos survive few time after that mark of 65 my But.... mammal's revolution and unfavorable conditions let to their extintion Time to enjoy eating our past treat , chicken 😎 it tastes like dinosaur , smell like a dinosaur , it is classified as a dinosaur.... Just enjoy the juice of revenge!!!

[@jupiterkelthuzad7289]

Just a note: The makers of Jurrasic Park did not know that some Therepods had feathers when the first movie(s) came out, so in the newer ones they wanted to keep the style. They found their mistake, but they wanted to keep the style so it didn't seem weird =U

[@thefluffyaj4119]

god I love studying birds and dinosaurs. did you know that birds could be considered reptiles? biologists use two classification systems, linnaean and phylogenetic. under the linnaean system, which classified things based off features, birds aren't reptiles. but under the phylogenetic system, which classifies things based off ancestry, birds are indeed reptiles. in fact birds closest living relatives are actually crocodiles. each of these systems have good uses and are used frequently. so, not only are birds living breathing dinosaurs, they could also be considered reptiles. a sparrows or bluejays closest non bird relative is a crocodile and I think that's so wild

[@archive2500]

Phylogenetic is still the best because you can map the Linnaean classification in the phylogenetic but you can not map the phylogenetic in the Linnaean classification. Phylogenetic is also objective, conclusive, and consistent.

[@miguelsalgado918]

Those clever girls should've been covered in feathers...

[@dracodracarys2339]

dinosaurs among us? idk man sounds kinda SUS

[@lunchpunchcrab32]

Chickens get hypnotized and freeze from seeing a line drawn on the ground, and a dinosaur is a chicken. So... Easiest way to survive a dinosaur encounter? Draw a line on the ground and that "big chicken" will freeze.

[@claytonodonkazakhstans1335]

Bassicly survival tactics in mesozoic

[@vincenzocapasso9990]

Very unlikely but it wouldn't matter...a 5+ tons predator wouldn't waste time and stamina for trying to hunt a small and not enough nutritional animal. So if you wouldn't invade their territory (in case they were territorial) they shouldn't mind you.

[@jonhohensee3258]

Lunch - He never said that dinosaurs are chickens.

[@MB32904]

dinosaurs aren't chickens, chickens are dinosaurs

[@bentoth9555]

I think the reason the JP movies go without the plumage is that the first conclusively feathered fossils were found after the first movie, and by then they had already gone without feathers in the movies and wanted to keep a coherent aesthetic.

[@graceignacio306]

"I'm so glad birds don't have teeth any more" Then came to my mind a duck 😢

[@Raison_d-etre]

Huh?

[@paulnjeru2005]

That cold open was one of the funniest I've ever seen

[@boglenight1551]

So, raptors were raptors? #MindBlown #PenisInWait

[@coolfrog8777]

Boglenight “pen is in wait”, please say it was that....

[@PU8698]

May-Fly The Protogen if he would have meant that he would have typed is like this(Is) and not like this (is)

[@eeefroge9825]

4:00 when the dinosaur fell there was a fire work outside my house. And it was perfect timing

[@UnisRapper]

A- AMONG US!!!

[@Mattioka]

AMONG US!!!!!!!!!!

[@gianlucabelgrado3624]

SUS

[@jocelynflorez8908]

6 minutes just to say “No. birds are theropods, a type of dinosaur.”

[@ethan.saraiva]

Theropod is just a classification of dinosaurs based on their bone structure. Technically there are still theropods although majority of birds have 4 toes aposed to 3 toes. A better term would be *avian* dinosaurs which is modern day birds following the evolutionary traits of the archaeopteryx.

[@jeromiousbingletonthe3st195]

Ethan Saraiva big brain

[@Goldsthar]

Birds are birds, a type of dinsaur. Fixed it.

[@DINO_X65]

@@ethan.saraiva actually archaeopteryx was related, but not really an ancestor of the bird lineage, kind of like gorgonopsids were mammal like but branched off before mammals

[@neildegrassetysonwithaknife]

@@ethan.saraiva they are still theropds, but they have derived characteristics. It's the same way we're mammals, but rather than having fur like are the ancestral characteristics of mammals, we have hair. It was just modified a bit, however, we are still mammals.

[@MsAerosensa]

This might have been one of your most well-done episodes yet. Creativity and editing was just superb.

[@star.of.all.time7]

As a bird lover, it’s time to show this video to everyone who thought birds are not dinosaurs.

[@jonhohensee3258]

Who cares that you're a bird lover?

[@archive2500]

@@jonhohensee3258 Rude.

[@jonhohensee3258]

@@archive2500 - Oh my goodness. 😑

[@spavliskojr]

This makes perfect sense. anyone who spends time around birds can really see it. Anyone see a shoehorn bill? those things look like living dinos. Also nightmare fuel to look at them.

[@nirmalaannadurai3140]

Have seen a aseel they are the cool looking chickens

[@LuigiG145]

It's unwise to use the term "Mammals" in context of tetrapod evolution as Mammaliaformes is only a crown group. The animals you're thinking of when you said "Mammals" are basal synapsids. All mammals are synapsids, but not all synapsids are mammals. _Dimetrodon_, Gorgonopsians, _Dicynodon_, _Edaphosaurus_, _Cynognathus_, and kin are all basal synapsids. Yeah, they're the ancestors of mammals but that doesn't make them mammals proper. Mammal refers to any synapsid within the crown group Mammaliaformes so any synapsids outside of this group are not mammals and are usually just called Stem-mammals, Mammal-grade synapsids, mammal-line pelycosaurs, etc. Just make sure the synapsid is actually within Mammaliaformes before you call it a Mammal.

[@walterr.2619]

You guys are doing an amazing job with the videos. They are entertaining and appealing for people of all ages.

[@lilacskies9493]

The parasaurolophus is my favorite dino… it’s just so neat looking with the crest on its head😀

[@xxdavid_gaming687]

Amogus

[@MB32904]

suskityrannus

[@shinian6523]

I pointed to a robin outside the window and told my 7 year old niece "Look! There's dinosaur". lol

[@Derpingmuffin]

"not as scary but scientifically speaking, it makes sense" -talking about giant chicken *square cube law tho*

[@Derpingmuffin]

@A Thing Brilliant, I've been waiting two whole years.. but now I know that my opinion is finally valid. Thankyou my friend, I owe you one

[@Derpingmuffin]

@A Thing thanks man

[@MB32904]

4d beings have to deal with square-cube-tesseract law

[@alwanrosyidi3753]

If only non avian dinosaur still exist, i'm sure we'll hunt them and roast them, making a 'roasted trex mukbang'. We're the top predator.

[@MundoJagaimo]

SUS AMONG US SUS

[@doubleoof7907]

god damn it

[@manilastreetsweeper5890]

If I hunt birds, then I'm a dinosaur hunter. If I farm chickens, then I'm a dinosaur *FARMER!!!!!*

[@zachseabass7414]

Raptor Herder!!!

[@CLONisKING]

the roar of the bird was sooo incredible awsome

[@admiralcat3809]

Dinosaurs never roar

[@dundee6402]

Clon King Fun fact: that roar was made from an elephant sound for The movie JP

[@kittehcatty5713]

*in its head* I am birb. HEAR ME ROARRRR!!! *cockadoodledoo* whoops....

[@kyleferreira3742]

In defense of Jurassic Park, the original was released in 1993 and it wasn't until 2008 that paleontologists noticed quill knobs on a velociraptor's forearm fossil, thus proving they had feathers. Granted, Archaeopteryx was discovered in 1861, but paleontologists have been slow to accept changing perceptions about dinosaurs (for example, many theropods having feathers, more bird-like than reptile-like, semi-warm blooded). It's good to be skeptical to major changes in science, but all I'm saying is that that impacted in filmmakers' decisions in Jurassic Park.