Did PRS REALLY make a Tele? NF53 Compared

PRs just released the NF53 which, at first glance, could be seen as their attempt at a Telecaster... but it has a few things that are clearly different from a Tele and we try to compare fairly in this video!
#prsnf53 #prsguitars #gearfest2023
I often get paid for my videos and the video itself and the following links should be considered advertising!
_________________________________________
The following are Affiliate links. I get a commission if you purchase ANYTHING after clicking on the links. This helps support the channel a lot and enables me to operate independently.
Get the Songwriting course HERE:
spectreacademy...
Here are some links to Thomann...
PRS NF53
thmn.to/thopro...
Sorry, the German Price is WAY higher than the US price and I would have a hard time recommending it at that price!
Here are many things I use daily...
www.thomann.de...
Gear from this video at Sweetwater:
PRS NF53
sweetwater.sjv...
Here is tons of stuff I use in my videos...
imp.i114863.ne...
Current LIMITED TIME Deals:
imp.i114863.ne...
_____________________________________________
here is a link to the AMPETE switcher:
www.musik-produ...
NOW AVAILABLE - HP42 Shirts
teespring.com/...
Link to my Patreon account:
www.patreon.co...
Find seriously different sweaters here...
mrgugu.com
Use Coupon Code "EytschPi" for 15% OFF
Stuff I use...
www.amazon.co....
"Make sure to pick up a digital copy of my entire discography, both published and unpublished, at www.therecordl..."

[@IamMusicNerd]

I love the guitar, just not the price. I was hoping it would be in the CE price range. But no question it sounds amazing, has incredible build quality and feel, and looks good as always.

[@abcrx32j]

PRS in a nutshell

[@kingfisher7960]

you mean SE?

[@NewPraetorianBlues]

@@kingfisher7960 I think not, they're probably comparing it to the CE24 because its the cheapest USA non-S2, and is also bolt-on. CE24's are $300 less than the NF53, and I'd say that's still a little much considering this has LESS hardware than a CE24 (less frets, no trem)... I feel like $2199 would be a very palatable price for the NF53.

[@Paul_Lenard_Ewing]

You and Glen should do one show together every week. With the 2 biggest A-holes in Guitardom on one show you could both make a living from the billion guys like me that would never miss it.

[@EytschPi42]

No idea if this is a compliment or not

[@Newnodrogbob]

@@EytschPi42correct

[@HobbyFinn2]

A clear compliment!

[@smeagol37]

Hey Henning! You should definitely listen to some „Alter Bridge“ stuff! Great band! Mark Tremonti on guitar and Myles Kennedy guitar/vocals. I think you will love it. I like the older stuff more than the new.

[@bartvschuylenburg]

Beautifull mids. I always have a mid-boost pedal on when I play my tele. This one already has those mids.

[@terryenglish7132]

Haunting mids ?

[@julesdiakogiannis]

Imho in that price range we (in EU) can score better T types (ifor those who dont want the Fender logo). There are many luthiers that can create a masterpiece for similar (or more important) lower price tag.

[@danharding9136]

Who?

[@soulassasin10]

Ok so quick question. I am looking for a new tele and these new PRS ones caught my eye 🤔 however i have nowhere close to me to actually get my hands on one to play it soooo i would like your feedback; n this matter. My budget is around 3k euro, how do you think they compare to lets say a Ibanez, Suhr, Fender CS, Xotic etc is it worth picking up over the competition? Thanks

[@bechhoefereric1291]

fender CS are better

[@ilmisxx2]

If you want a tele, this is not it, go for a recent Fender American Original series. This PRS is way overpriced imo

[@StupidGuitar]

@@bechhoefereric1291really? You’ve played all of them?

[@StupidGuitar]

@@ilmisxx2really? The PRS is priced similar to high end fender teles. They certainly aren’t a 1:1 replacement. The NF53 has pickups more to my liking than most teles.

[@ilmisxx2]

@@StupidGuitar yes really, the PRS is a realitively cheap to make, multipiece body, 3 piece neck with a scarf joint, bolt on neck. There is no reason for it to be that expensive. Preference is one thing but this is objetcively not a tele, all it has in common with a tele is a similar body shape

[@RB-oc7ti]

Myles Kennedy- best voice in hard rock over the last 20 years!💪 Also a fantastic guitarist, who plays a variety of styles - from hard classic rock, to bluesy and jazzy stuff - both within AlterBridge and in his solo stuff! He wanted a versatile guitar that could handle alot of those different styles. Plays it all the time in recordings and live. Great musician!

[@PooNinja]

You probed wrong, we’ll send a kit it’s painless ( mostly) and simple to use. 👽🔬

[@ExplosiveNotes]

I still have no idea how they prevent those birds from shitting all over the fretboard. Anyway... I believe, that the umbrela opener's point is, that when blind tested in the mix, people can tell humbucker from single coil at best.

[@EytschPi42]

Umbrella opener… that took me a while

[@ExplosiveNotes]

I'm sure he's great at other things as well, just Glenn opening umbrela really got stuck in my head.

[@ToneDeth.]

I think Paul has said when he first started making guitars he expected maybe 10-20% of guitars would be bird inlays. But it ended up being way more as people liked them. We did this to ourselves. We could have lived in a world where there weren't birds shitting on pretty much every PRS guitar. It would have been perfect. I hate birds.

[@edpetrikk2027]

Hello …The wheel has already been invented and it’s doing just fine ..

[@cameronfarrell9076]

I'm the one with the money you want, so I'll be the one to judge if it needs locking tuners or not..... It does.

[@helloDobson3259]

Just because it has a 25.5 scale neck, doesn't make it a telecaster. It's just new guitar. Seems nice. Worth the price? That's for PRS to market/influence/persuade/etc, and the broad market to eventually settle out on.

[@DMSProduktions]

It's NOT a 'Tele'! Tele inspired yes, but it is LESS Tele than a Tele, than the Silver Sky is 'Strat'! Its got its OWN thing going on!

[@sassycat]

Shhhhhh...narrative. 😸

[@DMSProduktions]

@@sassycat Narrawhat?

[@paulstubbs4487]

As the Fender is clearly less powerful should you not adjust the amp to suit. Yes the Fender sounds lacking that could probably be rectified.

[@landonbailey]

This is the video I’m currently watching

[@marklavanish5024]

I LOVE your videos! Thank you sir for existing!

[@lucagare4809]

Strange question... May sounds stupid but I'm serious 😅 How can I focus more on practicing and actually getting better rather than spending my time looking at and thinking of gear? Need some advice

[@kunkmiceter]

Same here .😅

[@DMSProduktions]

Stay OFF YT!

[@StupidGuitar]

Delete your YT account and setup a firewall that blocks access to Reverb and Sweetwater

[@DMSProduktions]

@@StupidGuitar Those work too!

[@sassycat]

In the immortal words of Frank Zappa: Shut up and play yer guitar. 😼😺

[@StratsRUs]

It's just the price.And an odd look. But for me, a Fender Tele is great as it is.

[@kingfisher7960]

Yea well I feel the opposite. The PRS tele offers something the other BAZILLION teles from Fender havent. This one comes from a reputable guitar company whereas Fender is not anymore. The whole reason your here is that fact. Fender doesnt make guitars like they used too. AND ITS BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE THEY HAVE. Well Done Paul!

[@kingfisher7960]

To make another sweeping statement and why these were made is the fact that MYSELF and many others will NOT purchase a guitar from The Big G or F because from 1970-2010 arguably both of them put out GARBADGE unless you spent over $5000 on a custom shop. PRS gave you that for that price and then brought in SE models that @ $1000 blow the G and F models out of the water. Facts.

[@rainshadowband3161]

Does the "NF" in NF53 stand for "Not Fender" ??? Lol - I love PRS, but can't afford too many too close together (just bought a Custom 24 a little over a month ago). They sound great, but I'll have to wait for a used one at this rate haha

[@terryenglish7132]

It was stated that the 2 string barrels aren't adjustable, but they might be. They're held by 2 screws instead of 1 like on a Tele. Shortening 1 will change barrel angle and intonation.

[@DaveMarket]

You are right. it wont achieve perfect intonation, it should get very close

[@terryenglish7132]

The pickups sound good and unique , but not at all like a single coil.

[@johnjohannesjuan]

I love that low-key (or even mid-key?) banter between you and Glenn about what influences the tone. Maybe you could do a blind test together?

[@bryanp8010]

1st thing I’m going is changing the bridge. Tele style bridges are a pain to intonate. Babicz makes awesome tele bridges

[@akwamarsunzal]

WOuld have liked to see a 4 way switch on this, differentiate it from the Fender. Added a 4 way to my Tele, love it!

[@terryenglish7132]

The piece construction is also important to the sound. I've yet to play a joined in the center of the bridge two piece body that was not super bright. Or a two piece w a big and small board that didn't have really good bass. From what I have, and have seen of the latest run of '52 RI Teles , they are 3 piece , w the bridge on just the middle board like here w the PRS.

[@billgreen3629]

Unpopular opinion but I think three piece bodies sound better than two piece bodies.

[@alementary4065]

"Hand CNC'd in America" LMAO

[@sassycat]

It's a PRS, it has some nice sounds. I might pick one up used in time. #glenniswrong

[@matt-fn9gr]

There’s just something about the classic tele I like, almost like I’ve been listening to it my whole life on my favorite songs, favorite albums and from my favorite artists. The PRS thing is a neat novelty but at the end of the day I wanna go home.

[@nedim_guitar]

I've grown to love Telecasters, but a belly cut and an arm carve are essential on that guitar. They're awfully un-ergonomic without the carve, they feel like a slab wood.

[@kunkmiceter]

Beautiful guitar and sounds great. 👍

[@briandevitt6903]

It sounds good for sure. But for that price range, if you want a Tele that's not a Tele, there are many better options in my opinion.

[@RobertSaxy]

It sounds different but in your hands with that amp I enjoyed the nf53 sound more

[@Newnodrogbob]

If only there was some device you could use to compare the weight of two guitars…

[@EytschPi42]

And obviously I had a scale right there but the room at Sweetwater

[@Newnodrogbob]

@@EytschPi42 I always keep one on me, along with my notched straightedge for checking neck relief and my multimeter for checking pickups and pots. You know, just in case the opportunity comes up to review a guitar while I’m just hanging out 😉

[@steverolfeca]

To my ear, the NF53 sounds like a Tele variant, but it wouldn't be my first (or even my 3rd) choice. This is opposed to the Silver Sky, which is everything I would want in a Strat, but improved. I can overlook a couple of visual glitches in the SS because it works so well, but not in the NF.

[@StupidGuitar]

Liked the videos especially the jabs at Glenn lol

[@stratolestele7611]

As you said, it's a PRS, so, of course it's made well and sounds good. The question is, does it scratch an itch you have? IMO, it's just a nice "electric guitar". It has nothing to do with a Tele. For great Tele tones, get yourself something that's more true to the recipe. I've got a few Teles, but what really does it for my hands, ears, and eyes, is my G&L Fullerton Deluxe ASAT Classic. What an exceptional guitar, and it's totally as Leo Fender wished.

[@RdamplificationUk1]

Yep... I really like that. 🎉

[@hgostos]

Interesting.. thanks!

[@Aguirrethewrathofgod]

Sounds good, look ugly (to me), price is crazy. Will like to see a comparison between PRS and G&L ASAT with MFD

[@stauffrt2]

Entertaining presentation style thanks!

[@andybungert]

shooooot that's pretty dope. and the D25 sounding killer.

[@peterjohnson4932]

Not really a fair comparison Henning. Forget the body shape for a moment, you're comparing humbuckers to singlecoils. Put the NF53 up against the Tele Deluxe and see what you think then.

[@markkonns2991]

Too expensive for a t-style guitar. Before spending that amount of money on that PRS I’d go with a AW signature, NJ Signature or the AZS. But that is just me, a Core PRS is a high premium guitar and fine for sure.

[@kasakka]

To me the primary failure of these new model from PRS is how they look. They are like a Tele got fat. While that particular real Tele in the video is probably the worst looking option you could pick to compare, in general the standard Tele does look less wide and thick than the NF53.

[@sandoncrowder7839]

It's based on a 53 tele that's why they compared an American vintage one

[@Burnt_Gerbil]

I have a Kiesel 8-string that is a single piece swamp ash body. The guitar weighs about 7 pounds. Maybe Paul isn’t looking for the right woods? 🤔

[@jamest.135]

Paul is overmarketing. I have a tele that destroys the prs. The prs is an amazing guitar but not for 3k

[@rumy6871]

PRS makes some cool guitars, but this Tele BS is not among them. Hard pass. Oh, PRS how about including a case for the US models? My Fender tele shipped with a great hard shell case. It also has locking tuners.

[@johngudgeon7454]

The white dog hair with the maple neck/fretboard is gorgeous although I'd prefer it with the Miles Kennedy pickups and wiring option. At six K Aussie dollars, it's too much of a stretch given our current economic climate. sigh...

[@Superjet113]

Great review, and I learned something about swamp ash, thank you Henning. You should of put Glenn at the end and said "assholes at the end".. LMAO 😁😆🤣

[@StupidGuitar]

He didn’t even go over swamp ash fully. There’s been a parasite that’s been demolishing swamp ash trees for years now. The price of that wood has gone up a lot over the last few years.

[@Superjet113]

@@StupidGuitar Yeah, I'll bet. I watched a documentary about this wood once and all those guys that fight in the swamps over who's log is who's property.. and how they will do about anything to get those logs back to their loading dock. hahaha, its pretty comical too.

[@allanflippin2453]

Hennihg, In this case, I have to insist that both you and Glenn are wrong! Of course the sound difference is not in the speaker here, but also the way you did the A/B test didn't show how the guitars contributed to the difference. The NF53 is louder than the vintage Tele. Pretty much, loud will initially sound better. Without adjusting the amp's volume and perhaps other controls, you have an unequal comparison. The NF53 doesn't twang. Turn up the volume while playing the vintage Tele, you'd get the rich twang it's known for. The Tele's sounds will shine when you don't have to strum the thing so violently to try to get over the volume difference. You should know this... you have a vintage Tele at home.

[@gpparaguay]

Esperaba un modelo mucho mejor por parte de PRS, no tiene nada de Telecaster. Me quedo con Fender Tele. 👍🏻

[@newgunguy4176]

No. It's not a Tele because it doesn't have Tele pickups.

[@lavadoraautomatica1]

Why you say that?

[@newgunguy4176]

@@lavadoraautomatica1 Because it's true.

[@lavadoraautomatica1]

@@newgunguy4176 so if I put Tele pickups on my bass would it turn my bass into a telecaster?

[@newgunguy4176]

@@lavadoraautomatica1 No, because of the scale length and gauge of strings. However, if you put Tele pickups on a Strat, it will become the most ergonomic and versatile Tele in the universe.

[@TheBlackzat]

Right, not a tele, it’s an NF53. If they wanted to do a full blown tele copy, they would make it, and better I might add. 😊

[@gibs8412]

not a tele without the ashtray bridge pick up

[@tickmagnet]

I think the PRS sounds great. But the bird inlays just seem garish on this style of guitar.

[@kunkmiceter]

They should make more guitars with dot inlays. Bird inlays just aren't for me.

[@PaulCooksStuff]

The very first two PRS prototypes they took to dealers to get initial orders, one had dots and one had birds. PRS themselves expected orders mostly for dots. The orders were mostly for birds. So dots might be what you prefer (and what PRS expected to be more popular), but the majority of the market wants birds.

[@kunkmiceter]

@@PaulCooksStuff The bird inlays itself looks really nice, however when I play one it's just too distracting to my eyes for some reason. Not sure why to be honest.

[@StupidGuitar]

@@kunkmiceter how the hell do you look at the front of your fretboard while playing? Your posture must be obscenely bad.

[@ibaneztubescreamer]

Great review.

[@dejadejayoutube]

btw, to avoid WW3, never let Glenn and Paul Reed Smith meet each other,...the tonewood wars we have witnessed up until this point will seem like childs play:)

[@rogerforsman5064]

So..the water is still in the heavy swamp ash body? And the light swamp ash are dry? Or is it more tonewood secrets?😂

[@EytschPi42]

I guess you‘d have a harder time drying the wet swamp ash to the same lightness the dry part has…. Something like that…. What do I know… Paul had a whole thing on it!

[@allanflippin2453]

Paul is a tonewood believer still. Plus he doesn't like stainless steel frets and is obviously ambivalent about locking tuners.

[@johnstitt2615]

We need a cartoon series of Glenn and Henning.

[@ClintsCrypt]

I side with Henning regarding where the tone is. Why? Because I am lazy and it is easier to change the guitar than the speaker. If Glenn is changing the speaker, he is an overachiever with too much time on his hands.🤣🤣🤣

[@franklintalbott2310]

So... is it routed under the pick guard? It would look awesome without a pick guard.

[@lavadoraautomatica1]

Why?

[@neatspy]

I mean it sounds incredible. And the look is really growing on me but are they really asking 3 GRAND?!

[@EytschPi42]

3700 in Germany

[@JoeDread316]

An American made Fender Telecaster custom shop costs more then the PRS NF53.

[@heymrguitarman7637]

Personally I call bullshit on the reasoning behind a 3 piece body. As a luthier myself I can tell you it's noticeably cheaper to make a 3 piece body than a 1 piece or 2 piece. Considering the wood is well and truly dried out before building with it, the water content isn't relevant. Light swamp ash is more expensive than heavy swamp ash, so buy it in smaller pieces to keep costs in check. Paul makes great guitars but he justifies cost cutting in bullshit ways regularly. Just admit, we built it to a set cost to fit right in the commercial market

[@EytschPi42]

Yeah, he should have said that and it is likely the reason! I just talked to Nik Huber and he said the same thing.

[@StupidGuitar]

If you’re a luthier you should also be aware of all the issues currently happening with swamp ash trees in general and how hard it is to get quality wood at a reasonable price. Just ad It you don’t know everything and you got caught.

[@terryenglish7132]

See my comment above. Using 3 pieces keeps the guitars all sounding more similar to each other . One piece bodies of course would vary the most depending on what the one board sounds like.

[@akwamarsunzal]

For me, I don´t like it! Especially the price! Almost $3k and no hardcase? What are they thinking?

[@EytschPi42]

3700 in europe

[@akwamarsunzal]

@@EytschPi42 Wow, I like it even less now! That is a crazy price for a guitar that, even if the price were more in line with Fender, will not seel anywhere near what Fender sells!

[@YIIMM]

Ryan seems cool.

[@lwwells]

Man… that fender needs a setup.

[@Bjornandhisguitar]

one sounds alive and the other sounds like a prs

[@StupidGuitar]

It’s always funny seeing gatekeepers out themselves. Well done !

[@Bjornandhisguitar]

@@StupidGuitar just an opinion 🙏

[@StupidGuitar]

@@Bjornandhisguitar nah it’s a troll and you know it but by all means deflect.

[@bkmeahan]

If you're looking for a tele that sounds like a tele, but also has more "meat" get an asat classic.

[@georgeangelakopoulos8884]

Classic PRS sales department trying to sell like its the only guitars in existence...

[@Paul_Lenard_Ewing]

It without a doubt sounds just like a NF53, lol The body mods and finish are killer. The price is obscene. Hang on to your Tele if you love it because this is NOT a Tele. Close? LOL, LOL, LOL.

[@StupidGuitar]

Ok boomer

[@stratolestele7611]

One more comment - As you're there at Sweetwater, you're part of the crowd of influencers who are promoting PRS' latest. Not a fair comparo, despite your efforts to appear critical. Sorry bud, but even the silliness of grabbing an out of tune Tele is an obvious effort to elevate the PRS. I'm no Fender fanboy, I've also owned several core PRS (though my '00 Singlecut is all that remains). I just like legitimate reviews. This ain't one of them IMO.

[@EytschPi42]

Hey… you see what you wanna see… we had no time whatsoever, so the Tele just wasn’t tuned… thinking this was deliberate is giving us way too much credit. Sometimes things happen that are out of our control.

[@eugenehavens]

Improving on a Tele isn’t really the message they should have gone with.

[@bradleyberdahl6148]

sweeeeeet

[@davidfaustino4476]

Every guitar that needs string changes needs locking tuners. So literally all of them.

[@StupidGuitar]

Nah

[@terryenglish7132]

Henning, I think you need one of those stupid "be nice" things before people post. Lots of folks snapping bad on everything and each other for no reason .

[@pickledparsleyparty]

Paul has probably said derisively "kids today can't even be bothered to wind a tuning peg" at least once in the past 5 days. Locking tuners, bro. Even Ibanez puts them on their non-floyds.

[@StupidGuitar]

Meh. I got several guitars all with non locking tuners. Not a single one with tuning stability issues and I tend to bend a lot and player heavier riffs.

[@pickledparsleyparty]

@@StupidGuitar Not about tuning stability. About restringing convenience.

[@StupidGuitar]

@@pickledparsleyparty it’s really that hard for people to make a small look? The difference in time and convenience is like MAYBE 30 seconds total for all 6 strings.

[@pickledparsleyparty]

@@StupidGuitar Not hard. Inconvenient. On the other hand, what's the point of non-locking tuners?

[@StupidGuitar]

@@pickledparsleyparty what’s the point of anything? Think they partially went for looks here as the vintage style tuners tend to be non locking but who the hell knows. Actually parts cost is negligible.

[@ToneDeth.]

Ghost white maple neck with those ugly bird inlays that look like they were drawn on with a sharpie. This guitar is $6,000 in Australia. That's a hard no. I;m sure its built perfectly, plays perfectly etc. But no. SO many other single cut guitars you could get instead for that price point.

[@KRAZEEIZATION]

PRS made a guitar with a body like a Tele and stuck their ugly headstock on it. Nice try!

[@burrellinvestments5952]

most cheap guitars have the scarf joint, so if I buy a premium instrument it better not have one... and I want a one-piece body.

[@StupidGuitar]

All cheap cars have rubber tires so if I buy a luxury car I don’t want rubber tires… oh wait…

[@burrellinvestments5952]

@@StupidGuitar not a good comparison, that would be like all guitars having strings to what you said. However, a cheaper way to make something shouldn't be found on a high end instrument.

[@StupidGuitar]

@@burrellinvestments5952 I mean your comparison was stupid so I countered with an equally stupid one. A scarf joint can also arguably be stronger. Gotta find some reason to hate on the guitar I guess… can’t just let it exist for what it is

[@burrellinvestments5952]

@@StupidGuitar I don't think that it was stupid, a legit reason I'm not over paying for an instrument that corners have been cut on. I don't hate it. I just don't like it and I'm not gonna buy one. I'm having something custom build for $1,200 way better.

[@StupidGuitar]

@@burrellinvestments5952 lol if you think a $1200 custom build is the same. Also no way you’re paying fair labor cost and getting an American made guitar with quality parts for that cost. Thanks for proving your opinion null and void. I can’t even. Thanks for the laugh.

[@rocinblues]

My question is why? PRS isn't making a tele here, it's just something else. Like a great movie and someone decides they can make a better version with a Part 2 and it flops at the theater. Some things should be left alone if you can't improve it, and this is one of those things! The Silver Sky and now this....Paul Reed Smith must be bored.. Nice video as always.

[@georgecaplan11]

Seems like a great guitar but it’s too expensive compared to Fender. I will wait until the SE version is released.

[@Faydit212]

Leo Fender turned in his grave, I think. Whatever this ugly looking and sounding guitar thinks, it is, it certainly is no Tele! Heavily overpriced for such a design- and sound-fail, at least for me. For so much money I easily get two USA Teles, not to speak of a lot of other possible options. PRS never had much affinity to Strats and Teles, so cobbler stick to your last! This obviously is not your territory!

[@rumy6871]

NF= Not Fricker

[@Bobby_Digital37]

The prs sounds good, but it’s just so dam ugly 😢 sorry prs this is a fail 👎🏽 please fix the looks and make this a great guitar 😊

[@kingfisher7960]

Henning, I get the copy thing. But do you realize how many copies of 3 guitars are out there and how many people made a shape similar? Please get off the train. It has left the building in 1998 with Napster. We all know what that did for the music industry. PRS made a company with a strat shape in 1985 more or less. Hes stuck to that shape until 2010 when he brought out a LP copy. Can we not get over the wheel? Who invented it? Cause many people made round things the shape of a wheel. Get my point. Get off the train. Nobody cares in 2023. PRS WON the lawsuit with Gibson over the LP shape (Tremonti), FENDER WILL NOT SUE FOR A TELE SHAPE. EVEN FEDERAL COURTS DONT AGREE WITH YOU AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, THATS WHO MAKES THE RULES. Live with it!

[@EytschPi42]

I am Notventils that train. I have no problem with hardware. I do have a problem when people copy things in software because it gets copied and shared by the millions.

[@7387470]

PRS makes a new Dentist/ Doctor guitar. Thanks but no thanks.

[@PaulCooksStuff]

Myles Kennedy MD?

[@StupidGuitar]

Edgelord makes an edgelord comment…. News at 11

[@felixschwab1573]

If you play Fender and PRS, where the hell is a Gibson? You F*...., No sorry, but I would like to see that. Becouse it is authentic. XD

[@EytschPi42]

Nope

[@YesuAiNimen]

no bleep at 3:58???🤣

[@LovinMusic1965]

That guitar sounds and looks terrible. It's like a guy in 1981 had a drink idea to cut a seats guitar neck off and put on a fender..

[@chippsterstephens6800]

No they did not. That’s hideous. And abomination of a tele. And it sounds like a lp more than a tele. That’s no tele. It’s not even close to one in tonality. Let’s be real.

[@lazvt8469]

Tele out of tune awfully .

[@stairwaytoheaven413]

Clearer,more defined 😂😂😂,actually thinner sounding, boring character,not half twang, fullness and character of telecaster.And the wimner is, of course, Fender.

[@iloveitall]

At that price you would expect a guitar that is free from fault at least construction-wise. But this one has a huge bug! I never had a guitar that had three intonation points in a line. It is just not possible. With that kind of bridge you will never be in tune. How poor is that for a three and a half grands guitar? Shame on you, PRS! Better learn your business first before you ask a fortune.

[@StupidGuitar]

Your ignorance is showing. Funny as they went over the tuning I’m the announcement video. Shame on you for not doing your research before raging like an entitled boomer. Better learn to research first before you look like a fool in a comments section.

[@peterschaefer1665]

Nope...not a tele

[@creepinonthebabes]

truss rod adjustment is in the wrong spot and why the hell does it have a cover?

[@18hot30]

I think it's FUNNY AF Henning!!!! rock on