Damn, that book ending was just full of sunshine and lollipops, a real feel good story lol
@OrbitOnceAround8 жыл бұрын
All I can say is Bruce Willis never had a better role
@Moscato_Moscato8 жыл бұрын
ONCEfineapplinus but what about *Cop Out*?
@OrbitOnceAround8 жыл бұрын
They were good movies, but it isn't rewatchable like Die Hard and the sequels minus the last one.
@OtakuHanzo8 жыл бұрын
The first Red says hello.
@printthelegends8 жыл бұрын
Moonlighting
@earthangelo54177 жыл бұрын
Butch in Pulp Fiction.
@CornishCreamtea078 жыл бұрын
It is just not Christmas until I've seen Hans Gruber fall off of the Nakatomi Plaza.
@dylankaiser55466 жыл бұрын
CornishCreamtea07 even if it’s December 26th?
@dylansmith52064 жыл бұрын
@@dylankaiser5546 Yes. Even if it's Dec. 26. Considering the fact that most folks don't even bother to take down all the Christmas decorations until sometime after New Years is over and done with.
@cooperminion8254 жыл бұрын
RIP Snape
@RyanAnthonyDigitalMedia8 жыл бұрын
Great. Now I'm totally in the mood to watch Die Hard.
@roach93978 жыл бұрын
I watched it two nights ago. I may watch it again though.
@RyanAnthonyDigitalMedia8 жыл бұрын
Rick Berman McCallum 'tis the season..
@UberNeuman8 жыл бұрын
...and pour one out for our boy, Alan Rickman. Fuck 2016.
@ranwolf768 жыл бұрын
You make that sound like it's a bad thing
@FutureWorldNow8 жыл бұрын
for real
@PlayerZeroStart7 жыл бұрын
"Nothing Lasts Forever" sounds like the title to a James Bond film.
@DGneoseeker16 жыл бұрын
And yet it's actually the title of a K-pop song if I recall correctly...
@danielgomes25765 жыл бұрын
Soooooo, Korean James Bond movie?
@parkerswanbeck54655 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing, and I even thought that the guy in the meant-to-be sequel to “The Detective” looked like a James Bond actor.
@JamesDavis-hg6xr5 жыл бұрын
Nothing lasts forever is also the title of an echo and the bunnymen song.
@DeadManSinging14 жыл бұрын
Theres a James Bond novel called "Nobody Lives Forever"
@Dolphinman3008 жыл бұрын
I lost it at "no shit lady does it sound like I'm ordering a pizza"
@MateoGarcia-lp7zt3 жыл бұрын
Same here
@enclavehere.79953 жыл бұрын
I wasn’t too sure if I wanted to watch this movie, but after hearing that I got to
@squ4tmobile8673 жыл бұрын
How’s your life mate? It’s been 4 years since you commented this
@amedtajanjimenez97673 жыл бұрын
@@squ4tmobile867 you replied to his 4 years comment 4 weeks ago.
@squ4tmobile8673 жыл бұрын
@@amedtajanjimenez9767 yea. So?
@deathsythelui7 жыл бұрын
I've never read the book, but I've always heard it analyzed as "McClane" (forgot the actual character's name, and I'm too lazy to find it), being an older, grizzled, more conservative police detective getting himself involved in the terrorist shenanigans just made things worse. That fact thematically ties into the whole reason for the visit to his daughter in the first place, which is to confront her on her professional and personal ethics as he sees it from afar. But, it's his old fashioned good guy vs. bad guy mentality that starts all the shooting and bloodshed that ultimately ends with his daughter being killed. If he had just kept his nose down and stayed out of the way, rather than trying to force his way into controlling the situation, the whole terrorist event would've probably gone down much better, and not killed his only family in the process. That's just what I've heard anyway...
@leecarroll46747 жыл бұрын
I love the movie and its been a while since I read the book but i'm sure a major difference is the extended relationship between Mclane and the air hostess on the flight at the beginning of the film. In the movie she shares a flirtatious look with John but I'm sure she is a much more prominent love interest in the book, and there are a few times when Leland is really struggling with his situation and he's thinking about getting through it so he can see her (the air hostess)?
@yolanda85638 жыл бұрын
Jingle bells with terrorist cells, John blew them all away. He hunted them down one by one and not a single one got away.
@bobwilson6797 жыл бұрын
...Hey!
@ianfinrir87244 жыл бұрын
Second verse, same as the first. Just a little bit louder and a little bit worse
@Jedigrandmaster6637 Жыл бұрын
Well, Theo survived, but he was arrested
@pizzaplanettruck97618 ай бұрын
Kristoff survived too.
@marbre13185 жыл бұрын
Read the book Honestly if this was a movie, I'm sure the ending will haunt you, great plot twist and ending straight up sad
@shamusbob79694 жыл бұрын
The book, though I never read it, being a big Die Hard fan, sounds like an extremely dark character study on a very angry man, and it sounds absolutely insane and like it would make a great movie in itself. The way it ends and how unlike McClane, Leland is the one who gets a lot of people killed, including his own daughter by getting involved.
@shamusbob79694 жыл бұрын
Read it this weekend, it was absolutely amazing, it actually did not disappoint, although Al chucking Dwayne T Robinson was tacky, the whole book was solid.
@touristygull20594 жыл бұрын
Shamus Bob the book does have flaws, but man it’s a great novel. Definitely underrated
@leghost83264 жыл бұрын
@@shamusbob7969 Just read the book. Doesn’t Al pull Robinson into the path of Karl’s bullet? And responsible for his death? I’m really confused by the ending.
@TheTrailerCREAT0R8 жыл бұрын
I honestly had no clue this was based on a book 📚
@Ike_of_pyke8 жыл бұрын
Abel Villa the first four are
@supermegapizzaguy8088 жыл бұрын
Ike of Pyke the first four?! really? What are the books?
@blakeandersonECW4208 жыл бұрын
me neither you learn something new everyday
@Ike_of_pyke8 жыл бұрын
In order Die hard 2 based off the novel 58 minutes Die Hard with a Vengence based off a screen play for a Brandon lee movie called Simon Says which got shuffled around until Fox got the script and made it Die Hard 3 ....as DH3 came out in 95 (2 years after Lee's passing) yeah... you can see what happened there. Live Free or Die Hard was based on the article "A Farewell to Arms" in Wired (you can find it easily enough)which outlined how the increasingly cybernetic world could be turned around on the people.
@mdo78 жыл бұрын
to back up Ike of Pyke written statement about the other Die Hard film, this is the book that the 2nd film was based on: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/58_Minutes and you can read more here: www.denofgeek.com/movies/die-hard/21313/the-strange-history-of-the-die-hard-movies
@Grnvolpe8 жыл бұрын
When Cinefix Told me Who Framed Roger Rabbit was originally a book i went out and bought it. But now you tell me die hard is a book?! Enough is enough
@skyhazel62058 жыл бұрын
Before you were born, YOU WERE ORIGINALLY A BOOK!
@hethrham1238 жыл бұрын
SkyHazel cosmic
@jordanpiatt44357 жыл бұрын
Carlos Gallon it is a good book
@6_dogs6 жыл бұрын
Carlos Gallon I got me the book as well :)
@SB992REBORN6 жыл бұрын
I HAVE HAD IT WITH THESE MOTHER F'ING NOVEL REFERENCES TO THESE MOTHER F'ING MOVIES!
@LWolf128 жыл бұрын
The first Lethal Weapon is a good Christmas movie.
@OtakuHanzo8 жыл бұрын
Was just going to comment this. My mom was watching the latest episode of Lethal Weapon the series. It was the Christmas episode and I asked her if Jingle Bell Rock was in it as a nod to the first movie. She said no but the name of the episode was Jingle Bell Glock so I was content.
@santos84688 жыл бұрын
Otaku Hanzo Plus it started with a woman falling off of a highrise and landing on a car.
@OtakuHanzo8 жыл бұрын
Sotnas Now that is a serious nod to the first movie! Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I may have to watch the show now.
@LWolf128 жыл бұрын
***** They are set during Christmas.
@NavySharkz7 жыл бұрын
Damn right! So is Gremlins and Die Hard 2.
@johnwatson39485 жыл бұрын
In 1986 a friend of mine was living in an apartment building near LA and would hang out with an old guy across the hall who had once been a successful writer - the writers name was Rod Thorp who said he had just sold his book about “terrorists taking over a building” to Fox and that they were making a movie based on it. My friend later directed a movie of his own and put Rod in as an extra.
@dtworeselling61043 ай бұрын
That’s really cool dude
@connornyhan8 жыл бұрын
There are those who say Die Hard is a Christmas Movie, and there are those who are wrong.
@connornyhan8 жыл бұрын
It's still a Christmas movie.
@connornyhan8 жыл бұрын
milster It's about as much of a Christmas movie as Home Alone. Both main characters are only in this situation due to it being Christmas, although Kevin McCallister is more of a psychopath (or sociopath) surviving a dangerous situation by beating the crap out of two low level burglars, whereas McClane is a father trying to not only survive in a deadly situation but save the lives of many others too. In my opinion Die Hard has more of the Christmas Spirit than Home Alone (which I do love btw).
@connornyhan8 жыл бұрын
Technically A Christmas Carol could have taken place at Thanksgiving, or New Years. In fact most Christmas movies could take place at any time of the year. But in order for that to happen there sripts would need modification, and Die Hard would need to be modified too. It's a Christmas movie, and a damn good one. Stop trying to refuse it is.
@connornyhan8 жыл бұрын
milster totally irrelevant. It's not like the only reason he was there was because he was visiting his family since it was Christmas. Oh wait. That's exactly why he was there.
@connornyhan8 жыл бұрын
milster I would argue any Christmas movie could take place at any other time of the year, with the exception of A Christmas Story or one or two others. But A Christmas Carol, easily could take place on Thanksgiving or New Years. Home Alone could also take place at any time in the year. It's A Wonderful Life, which is a considered a Christmas Classic could also take place at any other time of the year, and I don't even consider it Christmas movie as is. Yeah that's right. Die Hard is more of a Christmas movie than It's A Wonderful Life. The main trait of a Christmas movie is that it takes place at Christmas time, and Christmas is more relevant to the story of Die Hard, than It's A Wonderful Life.
@DeadManSinging18 жыл бұрын
I kind of like the ending of the book, it's gritty and moralistic. Though I understand why it wouldn't have worked in the film version.
@Outpost31Research8 жыл бұрын
Wow, that book is kinda fucked up. The film had just the right amount of grit and light hearted moments. #bestaction/christmasmovieofalltime
@kellychuang83738 жыл бұрын
Kevin F Yeah it really goes on a downer.
@terryp25175 жыл бұрын
Thank you for being thorough with the differences between the book and movie. I enjoy these videos
@willemvandebeek8 жыл бұрын
RIP Alan Rickman :(
@msamour4 жыл бұрын
Watching the first two die hard movies has become a Christmas time classic at our house. I used to watch with my father every year. It reminds me of spending time with him.
@sonicfan50775 жыл бұрын
You know Die hard 2 is also based on a book called 58 Minutes.
@Anonymous-o8j5 ай бұрын
And 58 Minutes is a better book than Nothing Lasts Forever.
@wutamanwutman8 жыл бұрын
It would've been crazy had they used these character dynamics with aging McClane and his daughter for Die Hard 4.
@TrustsLiars8 жыл бұрын
Could you imagine Frank Sinatra in Die Hard instead of Bruce Willis?
@HnRZ8 жыл бұрын
Sure, he could have performed a theme song for it too, "Die Haaaaaaard...."
@skizzzle7 жыл бұрын
They were thinking Burt Reynolds at one point
@SuperColonel915 жыл бұрын
@@HnRZ lol
@SuperColonel915 жыл бұрын
Worst would be Richard Gere who was one of the choices
Kako Mohammed berserk really isn't that depressing. the latest chapters especially have been pretty hopeful.
@NikGushue8 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Bruce Willis is in The Detective, jist as an extra but still interesting.
@cooperminion8254 жыл бұрын
Theory: Bruce's character is inspired to become a cop after the events of The Detective
@chaoticiannunez241910 ай бұрын
He's not in The Detective. The film you're refering to is The First Deadly Sin, Bruce Willis was an extra in that film, which was also Sinatra's final role. But you know who IS in The Detective? Lloyd Bochner, Hart Bochner's father.
@gawainethefirst7 жыл бұрын
The watch was not a gift from Ellis, but was a bonus from the Nakatomi Corp.
@ih8kit5 жыл бұрын
There are a few errors at the end of this video. In "Nothing Lasts Forever" Karl does come out of nowhere and starts shooting. Karl does kill a number of people before he is shot killed by Sgt. Al Powell (Two shots to the head.) as the video states. However Captain Robinson did not voluntarily jump in front of Joe Leland and take a bullet for him. Sgt. Powell actually grabs Robinson and pulls him in front of Leland saving Leland's life. Leland was shot in the leg, but that occurred much earlier in the novel. The novel ends with Leland being given needed medical attention and loaded into a waiting ambulance. He does not remain lying on the street. "Nothing Lasts Forever" is a very good book. It is well worth checking out.
@cjishere978 жыл бұрын
DO THE GODFATHER
@antonk63598 жыл бұрын
Michael's injury to the face is much more serious in the book. The swelling is huge and his nose continuously drips with snot. Yuck.
@mdo78 жыл бұрын
I want them to also do a comparison between Shooter and the novel based on it, Point of Impact: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_of_Impact
@General.Apeshit8 жыл бұрын
Capo Anderson the book and the movie are so insanely similar.
@tianapitesr85537 жыл бұрын
Does anyone not want Thomas Harris Silence of the Lambs?
@mdo77 жыл бұрын
Tiana Pi Tesr Would love to see somebody at Cinefix to compared the book and film for Silence of the lambs.
@ItsScapeGoated8 жыл бұрын
Please do a Silence of the Lambs WTD. I don't wanna hear anyone go "Well they're very similar" Yeah well so is Die hard, but I still want a SOTL WTD.
@treflipscanligma2473 жыл бұрын
Everyone forgets First blood took place during Christmas. It’s a better Christmas movie 🥲
@CodeXCDM6 жыл бұрын
It'd be kind of interesting if the crew that made the first Die Hard could have made a prequel with the previous book's material. I suppose that, given Willis is now as old as the book's protagonist, they *could* make a film with him, but it's not be a "Die Hard" prequel, course.
@jasontermini84873 жыл бұрын
Alan Rickman's face when he falls off the building is a real face of realizing his harness was detached on purpose. Not to kill him but the director wanted a more genuine reaction.
@agochoa7 жыл бұрын
So in the end, Carl is shot by Carl. Nice.
@HushtheMag Жыл бұрын
You forgot about Kathi Logan. The tart on the plane who Leland meets for a few minutes on the plane but stays in the rest of the book and stays in contact with Leland during his tower escapades, Could have done without her in the book though tbh, Lelend just met her but the book treats it like they've been seeing eachother for months lol.
@DemonBoy32238 жыл бұрын
How about a few WtD? suggestions: The 39 Steps - 1915 book vs. 1935 Hitchcock film Black Runner vs. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Angels & Demons The War of the Worlds The Sum of All Fears Solaris - book vs. 1972 or 2002 films
@damienhuff55897 жыл бұрын
Could you guys do Interview with Vampire (and possibly Queen of the Damned). There were a lot of differences between the book and movie, especially with the characters.
@sperrin6 жыл бұрын
Did you guys even read the book as you got a lot of things very wrong. The fists with your toes is not in the book. Robinson does not jump in front of Leland to save him, Powell grabs Robinson's shoulder and forces him in the line of fire. Leland isn't left dying on the floor, the ambulance crew pick him up and out hi the the ambulance. There is an Argyle in the book, he's the black taxi driver at the start that drives Leland to the airport.
@danielhall12268 жыл бұрын
Ok who else is shocked Die Hard is a book?
@edward48408 жыл бұрын
Daniel hall no one
@danielhall12268 жыл бұрын
Da Pumaface No one other than all the people who made the same comment. -_-
@jakegeddes54808 жыл бұрын
Daniel hall if you're acknowledging that other people made the same exact comment then why did you take the time to type it again instead of just liking another one?
@danielhall12268 жыл бұрын
Jake Geddes Wtf are you talking about? I made my comment then read other people's. -_-
@nour21468 жыл бұрын
Daniel hall I am, just now
@owenoulton93127 жыл бұрын
Thank you, thank you, thank you. I had suggested this one last fall. I don't know if that's the reason you gave us this Christmas present or if you were already working on it, but thank you from the bottom of my heart.
@wholovescatsilovecats58287 жыл бұрын
This made me lol so hard because I said out loud to myself that duh it says it's based on the book in the opening credit and then the guy in the video pointed that out as well! Well played sir ! Well played ...
@gutz19818 жыл бұрын
Just saw a 70mm copy of this film in the cinema here in London. And it was so great. Worth every cent and it just proves how not as good modern day films are, because even though I have seen this film so many times before, I was never once bored of the story and was glued to the screen more than I have been in recent years with the new films.
@MrPyroguru7 жыл бұрын
There will never be another like this one!
@El-Duderino-His-Dudeness6 жыл бұрын
And yet Diehard wouldn't work in modern day as well with internet and cell phones. Like so many of the greats.
@FallouFitness_NattyEdition6 жыл бұрын
It's a masterpiece that's for sure
@nimay138 жыл бұрын
They don't make villains like Gruber anymore (both grubers, DH1 and 3). Which is sad.
@javib29782 жыл бұрын
The novel that was based on Die Hard. Does the elevator shaft sequence too. Sidenote. The film Die Hard didn't do the elevator shaft sequence first. That idea goes to Ridley Scott's Alien.
@Nightmare0967 жыл бұрын
Hey, you guys should do "Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?" and Blade Runner.
@velvetsparrow5 жыл бұрын
Also titled “Bruce Willis channels his inner Ryuji Sakamoto”
@usmcsgt463598 жыл бұрын
you should do a the difference with full metal jacket and it's book
@rmmatsus8 жыл бұрын
Correction: Deputy Chief Dwayne T. Robinson doesn't leap in front of McClane/Leland at the end of the book. What is says is: "Robinson had his gun out, but he never got off a round. Karl shot first, as Al Powell grabbed Robinson's shoulder and pulled him into Karl's line of fire." Yup. Powell practically straight-up murders Robinson in the original book. The 70's were a different time.
@STAYHOME20204 жыл бұрын
@Brady King Straight up cold blood, and totally out of nowhere.
@TheAnonyomusGuy8 жыл бұрын
Will we get a new Walking Dead Differences for seasons 4-6?
@galdito82388 жыл бұрын
TheAnonymousGuy yes
@w0bbl3r6 жыл бұрын
You missed the start of the book. The cab ride to the airport, where Leland pulls his gun on some asshole causing trouble with the cab driver, and then worrying about it as he goes for the plane. And then the start of his romance with the flight attendant, I forget her name. Then you miss the part about him being obsessed with getting his hands on a kalashnikov, which he sees as a great weapon that would help his fight no end. Instead he ends up with an old BAR, a WW2-era assault style rifle. I also didn't hear you talk about the massive difference in how Leland/Mclane got his wounded feet. It was a planned thing from Gruber in the book, in which he has made his men smash all the lighting in the stairways, letting the broken light tubes fall into the stairs, plunging the stairwell into darkness. Leland then walks into the stairwell, wondering why the lights are out and immediately stepping into the glass and starts straight away to berate himself for literally walking into such a simple trap. And it all happens because Gruber had noticed that Joe had left shoes and socks in the room before escaping. There was also a slightly different reason for the "fists with your toes" thing that Joe does after a flight. This not being something a guy on the plane tells him, but rather something he had found soothing back when he was a pilot years before.
@muz1117 жыл бұрын
1. In the book, Leland doesn't leap off the building to escape an explosion, more to avoid the terrorists that have came hunting for him as they shoot the helicopters out the sky. 2. Robinson doesn't jump in front of Leland at the end, Al Powell shoves him in front of Karl's firing line to save Lelands life. Also, it's not actually noted that Leland survives, with the last line suggesting he actually dies.
@guyincognito25127 жыл бұрын
I like the darker tone of the book better. It being John's daughter and she dies. Karl guns downs a bunch of people and the captain jumps in front to save John.
@ericrhodes51747 жыл бұрын
Robinson doesn't jump in front of Leland, Powell carelessly throws him in front of Leland which results in his death. The book is pretty mediocre. Avoid it.
@MsWatismyname7 жыл бұрын
The book doesn't have Alan Rickman.. And he is the best.
@georgeguja99966 жыл бұрын
Happy 30th anniversary for the movie
@sammylane218 жыл бұрын
So is THE DETECTIVE a prequel to DIE HARD???
@Preeve7 жыл бұрын
Sammy Lane Not anymore. Since Sinatra declined to appear in the film, Die Hard (before it was called Die Hard) was stripped of all references to The Detective. The Detective more or less has nothing to do with Die Hard, but many things to do with the original book.
@jagannathbarman67128 жыл бұрын
Why is McLane holding an AK?(in the cover)
@Firefox-hw1eg8 жыл бұрын
DIE HARD IS THE BEST CHRISTMAS MOVIE EVER AND I WILL FIGHT THOSE WHO SAY OTHERWISE!
@Thydeepestfear8 жыл бұрын
Firefox444 sleepy cast? Lol
@sharebear4218 жыл бұрын
Thydeepestfear what...?
@Vanessinha91Pucca8 жыл бұрын
Home alone was great too
@malikhansen958 жыл бұрын
No Iron Man 3 is the best Christmas movie ever.
@williamblackfyre48668 жыл бұрын
Firefox444 hateful eight is a better Christmas movie
@tomaszskowronski14067 жыл бұрын
one difference too obvious to mention but i'll do it anyway- Leeland doesnt use the now iconic Beretta 92. Obviously, as it wasnt made yet. His weapon of choice is Browning Hi-Power.
@Cellwinn8 жыл бұрын
Please do Starship Troopers - What's the Difference?
@tennisdude522788 жыл бұрын
Do Lord of the Rings
@92JazzQueen6 жыл бұрын
Overall, this movie is way better than the book. And we are all glad for it. I also think it would have been interesting if The Arnold took this role up. On the other hand, it was supposed to be a deconstruction of the usual typical 80's movie, and Bruce Willis on the other hand at the time was the odd choice to play an action hero.
@KenMasters.5 жыл бұрын
If they stayed faithful to John McClane's old age like how he was in the novel, they would've gotten Clint Eastwood for that role! Eastwood himself also owned the rights to the novel.
@KiamatDusk8 жыл бұрын
Ellis did NOT give Holly the watch, it was a gift from the company for her work.
@sperrin6 жыл бұрын
True but its pretty clear that Ellis tries to rub the expensive watch in John's face. Plus who's idea was it to give Holly a watch? Could very well have been Ellis as its heavily hinted that he's trying to get her into bed.
@davrulesdawurld8 жыл бұрын
Last Christmas my mom asked me to go out and get her and her boyfriend a Christmas movie from a movie store but it was closed, so I gave them a VCR and VHS copies of Die Hard and Lethal Weapon and said "here's some good Christmas movies" They watched Die Hard
@baroncalamityplus8 жыл бұрын
I saw The Detective and read both books as well as seen Die Hard and I had no idea that Thorp wrote the second book with Frank Sinatra in mind. The action pieces would have not worked for a man of Frank's age and health in 1979. His last film in 1980, The First Deadly sin, was an amazing performance but it was very difficult for him and retired shortly after. While Frank was a huge star, he never was an action hero.
@krustomer8 жыл бұрын
I put you guys in my Columbia application, so this video is probably what the admissions officers will see. Heck yeah
@krustomer8 жыл бұрын
(if they bother to look it up)
@ultrauniqueRRRfan2166 жыл бұрын
This is the rare exception to the belief that the book is better than the movie. In the case of Die Hard vrs Nothing Lasts Forever, Die Hard is a clear, definite winner!
@jordanpiatt44358 жыл бұрын
You miss two difference, one was that it took two days in the book, but not in the movie, plus the beginning of the book was at the airport,mean while in the movie was in the airplane.
@kyotoandsunchips85858 жыл бұрын
Do The Lord of the Rings trilogy next? Thank you
@keldaris86258 жыл бұрын
There is really about six changes that mattered: 1, The barrow downs 2. Elves at helms deep 3.Faramir's portrayal 4.Battle of the Pelennor Fields 5.The Scouring of the Shire 6. Everything Arwen does
@jasonblalock44298 жыл бұрын
+keldaris Maybe in terms of the plot itself, but there are several significant character differences too. Aragorn is much more complicated in the movies, starting unsure of himself (and something of a self-loathing human) whereas in the book he's pretty much always Mr. I-Am-Awesome-And-Will-Be-King the whole way through. Or, Sam was considerably dumber in the book - but still faithful - whereas Merry & Pippin were considerably smarter. Not to mention the omission of Denethor's Palantir from the movies, which I consider to be one of the only major mistakes Jackson made in terms of trims and edits. Or, for that matter, the whole business with Sam's temptation by the Ring was also cut pretty much entirely along with a lot of his trials rescuing Frodo from Minas Morgul.
@jurisprudens8 жыл бұрын
What about the fact that in the book Gollum slipped on a rock and fell into the lava pit by himself, as opposed to Frodo murdering him in the movie? This is very out-of-character for Frodo, I would say...
@smithgdwg8 жыл бұрын
Well you could say that Frodo didn't have any intention to murder Gollum at that point. He was just trying to get the ring back.
@pcdesign007 жыл бұрын
you forgot about Leland throwing the money out the window
@JoeMacStevens3 жыл бұрын
I like the darker ending of the book. I bet Hollywood will try to remake Die Hard and use the book ending.
@Insaneian8 жыл бұрын
Yes. YES! FINALLY! THANK YOU SO MUCH! I've only been asking for this since WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE started! Thank you! Next Christmas...Die Hard 2?
@luisgonzalez67218 жыл бұрын
should do one of Dexter, True Blood, Lord of the Rings, Parker & Alex Cross.
@WalterLiddy7 жыл бұрын
Wrong. The watch was not a gift from Ellis - it was from the company, part of her promotion. It symbolizes her ambition for upward mobility. This is the same motive that drives Gruber - a man hopelessly determined to become one of the upper-crust. She releases the watch, letting go of her unrealistic ambitions, while he clings to them and falls to his death.
@reecerife78395 жыл бұрын
This was based on a book? I'm mildly surprised.
@lewatoaofair25227 жыл бұрын
Child and Junta are pronounced "Chee-lay" and "hoon-tuh" respectively.
@brigadier-tc85656 жыл бұрын
You know, I read the book not that long ago, and it is brilliant! It is definitely on par with Die Hard PS: When I read it, I seem to remember Al Powell pushing Robinson in front of Leland, making it more sinister than a brave sacrifice
@lelanddyer94617 жыл бұрын
I want you to know that my name is rare. It isn't named often. Every time you say it, my ear perks up. It is coincidentally unsettling for me. Carry on.
@mubiusford86938 жыл бұрын
Nosferatu? that's a load of classic there ;)
@joshuaschulz38978 жыл бұрын
Watched Die Hard again this year. Here's the thing, the moment in the Bathroom where Mclane tells Powell to find his wife and say he's sorry, is what elevates this movie beyond standard action fare by giving the protagonist (antagonist... I'm not having this argument again!) an emotional arc as well as a structural one. Is there a similar scene in the book? If so, what is it about? Seems like Leland is pissed at his daughter from the beginning and would never change. Please let me know. Merry Christmas and Yip-ee-kay-aye.
@marbre13185 жыл бұрын
7:05 I read that part and it was too dark, even for audiences, that girl (young) was one of them who shot down the choppers, she went down the stairs with an Ak47 and acting she was going to surrender, Leland at the time is angered after seeing his daughter dragged out the window shot her in the head just like that... It's pretty dark, honestly if this version was made it's gonna be one of the most saddest movie ever
@GrantDaily8 жыл бұрын
Please do The Fox and the Hound!
@CripTikStorm6 жыл бұрын
One of the rare cases where I prefer the movie over the book.
@lilicorrea85158 жыл бұрын
The day after I watched Die Hard for the first time, you guys post this! what a coincidence!
@kyradelemarre46918 жыл бұрын
could you please do a what's the difference on Coraline??
@texasranger95998 жыл бұрын
With the new Blade Runner teaser do "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?"
@VampiresCrypt6 жыл бұрын
Come out to the coast, we'll get together, have a few laughs...
@GenXGeek136 жыл бұрын
Robinson doesn't jump in front of John to save him, though. Powell pushes Robinson in front of Leland (McClane) in order to save his life. Robinson was less of a comical tool than he was in the film. Instead, he's a genuine a-hole. Also, in the book, Leland (McClane) flirts with a stewardess on his flight in. He ends up talking to her during the siege via cb, during an emotional low point. The film nods at this when McClane and a flight attendant lock eyes and smile as he deboards.
@ChannelNotFound-do7wk8 жыл бұрын
Do The Shawshank Redemption-What's the difference
@fluminox132 жыл бұрын
I was truly suprised when I saw this video on my startpage, even when I watched the movie at least 3 times
@AnonEyeMouse7 жыл бұрын
Wait... estranged wife? Not in Die Hard... She is working away from home, and there is tension over the arrangement, but the two are still married and not separated.
@sperrin6 жыл бұрын
I see you don't know what the word "estranged" means...
@Clay36138 жыл бұрын
Just like The Running Man, the movie improves on the book.
@w0bbl3r6 жыл бұрын
How can you say nobody knows it's a book? It says right at the start it was based on a novel, and even names the author. It's a bloody good book as well. Better than the movie in fact, though not by much.
@Gurra88 Жыл бұрын
They're either idiots or only saw it once but missed the very beginning
@Speedracer69968 жыл бұрын
Do lethal weapon next! It's also a Christmas movie
@ericrhodes51745 жыл бұрын
But it was never a book
@neolunaticus8 жыл бұрын
Holy crap, what timing! I just saw Die Hard a few nights ago!
@RandomRoss7 жыл бұрын
Yes I have had so many arguments on Die Hard being a Christmas movie and I think it is one.
@GoddessOfWhim20038 жыл бұрын
Die Hard is the first Christmas movie we watch every year on Black Friday or that Saturday. we have a hard time not quoting, but it's fun
@suspectvendetta51758 жыл бұрын
Book Gruber was a little handsy in that hostage scene.
@gabrielpresley66998 жыл бұрын
do one on 1984
@Calzaki8 жыл бұрын
forgot to mention that most of those extra characters and scenes not involving mcclain or the extra stuff with Gruber were all added in because Willis was still filming Moonlighting at the same time so they needed something to film while he wasn't available
@neoeyebeleave8 жыл бұрын
Please do "Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol" book vs movie! Happy Holidays!