Distributive Justice pt 1 - Rawls vs Egalitarianism

  Рет қаралды 7,622

Philosopher Games

Philosopher Games

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 11
@nafeesahmad2973
@nafeesahmad2973 7 ай бұрын
You have hit the nail right on the head....great
@Plus4Charisma
@Plus4Charisma 4 жыл бұрын
That meme at the beginning is legit.
@PhilosopherGames
@PhilosopherGames 4 жыл бұрын
Haha, thanks!
@surabhichavan7636
@surabhichavan7636 4 жыл бұрын
In that example about the 4 economic structures, I think A would be a better outcome actually. I mean I get that the lowest group gets the most money in C so C should be prioritized, but then C is also where the middle group and most advantaged are making much more than the least advantages. So even if objectively the least advantages are better off in C, they’re not actually gonna be happier in C because they see lots of other people earning much more than them, and that’s just gonna make them miserable, or at best, not very happy with their situation as much. In A they might be much happier, because they don’t see any other group making much more than them, so they don’t feel inferior in any way. That’s just my take. Thanks for making the video :)
@mpaterson
@mpaterson 3 жыл бұрын
That's an interesting point of view. I think that while the appeal of Economy A is in its egalitarian, equal value, it does not pair well with a market economy. Perfect equality in an economy leaves no room for incentive to grow. In Economy C, while the lower class still earns the least, it has a livable, satisfactory wage, with which it can contribute to the economy effectively (by consuming products), while also leaving room for those with enough money to purchase capital goods and land to improve the economy. A key characteristic of Rawls's approach is its accommodation for pluralism.
@88marome
@88marome Жыл бұрын
To me it's a question of why would anyone want more than anyone else? Why would you want more than what you need to survive and be healthy? It doesn't make sense to me. Everyone should have access to food, housing, medicine and mental health support.
@minenhlenokukhanya5416
@minenhlenokukhanya5416 3 жыл бұрын
Clearest explanation I've seen of these 2 concepts 👌🏼
@PhilosopherGames
@PhilosopherGames 3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@soniatchka
@soniatchka Жыл бұрын
Wonderfully explained, thank you so much !!😊
@HerrKakikonyv
@HerrKakikonyv 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for these videos!
@PhilosopherGames
@PhilosopherGames 4 жыл бұрын
No problem, I'm glad you like them!
Distributive Justice pt 2 - Libertarianism vs Socialism
14:08
Philosopher Games
Рет қаралды 3 М.
Man Mocks Wife's Exercise Routine, Faces Embarrassment at Work #shorts
00:32
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Поветкин заставил себя уважать!
01:00
МИНУС БАЛЛ
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Крутой фокус + секрет! #shorts
00:10
Роман Magic
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
Episode #137 ... John Rawls - A Theory of Justice
28:47
Philosophize This!
Рет қаралды 32 М.
Religious Pluralism vs Exclusivism - Philosophy of Religion
18:50
Philosopher Games
Рет қаралды 3,8 М.
The Veil Of Ignorance
1:37
BBC Radio 4
Рет қаралды 352 М.
Three Moral Theories | Normative Ethics
6:49
Philosopher Games
Рет қаралды 30 М.
Daniel Hausman - Luck Egalitarianism
10:10
Serious Science
Рет қаралды 15 М.
"I think, therefore I am" Explained | Descartes | Cogito Argument
4:08
Philosopher Games
Рет қаралды 46 М.
Anderson's "What is the Point of Equality?" (First Part)
35:46
Elliot Goodine
Рет қаралды 4,9 М.
What Is Justice?: Crash Course Philosophy #40
10:15
CrashCourse
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
What's the difference between morality and ethics?
4:05
Globethics
Рет қаралды 167 М.
Man Mocks Wife's Exercise Routine, Faces Embarrassment at Work #shorts
00:32
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН